Note 1: Click CTRL+j on your keyboard before using this spreadsheet in EXCEL97.
Note 2: Due to different monitor, EXCEL, and fonts capabilities on different computers, the text on some of the
sheets may be truncated. It may be necessary to unprotect the sheet and resize some of the columns.
Note 3: This spreadsheet needs to be copied to the hard drive to be used. It cannot be run off a floppy drive.
Note 4: Figures accompanying the text are scanned into the spreadsheet. For clarity of these figures it may be
useful to print these pages and use the printed figures.
I.
Input Sheet - General Information
l
II.
The general information section requests information about the agency. This
information is not required for the analysis, but the information entered here
may be displayed on the "Results" sheet.
Input Sheet - Design Information
l
l
l
l
l
All design inputs are required except sensitivity analysis.
No default values are used.
Information can be retrieved from the "Saved Data" sheet using the "Retrieve Data"
button. The existing data can be replaced or saved as a new set using the
"Save Data" button.
Clicking on the "Retrieve Data" button opens the "Saved Data" sheet. Select the
appropriate row to be retrieved and click on the "Export" button.
If the retrieval is successful, the data are retreived. Changes can be made and saved
as a new data set using a different value for the search ID. The data can also
be overwritten using the same search ID. The search value can be text, numbers, or a
combination of the two that uniquely identifies the data (example: Project Numbers).
This feature can also be used to save a default set of values.
Using the "Clear All" ID to retrieve the "Clear All" data set clears all the data in
the spreadsheet.
Design information such as initial and terminal serviceability, concrete properties, base
properties, and reliability and standard deviation can be input in the appropriate cells.
Table 14 provides help for estimating base property values.
Climatic properties such as wind, temperature, and precipitation, which are required for
positive temperature differential calculation, can be estimated using the table of climatic
properties for major cities provided in table 15.
A pavement type can be selected by clicking the option buttons provided. For JPCP and
JRCP, the joint spacing needs to be entered in ft in the space provided. This
automatically calculates the effective joint spacing to be used in design.
Edge support can also be selected using the option buttons provided. This
automatically calculates the edge support factor to be used in design.
A first run MUST be performed using design inputs for all variables and using an
estimated effective subgrade k-value. This determines an approximate slab thickness
for the inputs provided. The user can then navigate to the seasonal k-value calculation
sheet (and, if necessary, the "Fill/Rigid Layer" sheet) to calculate the k-value adjusted for
the effects of season and presence of fill section or rigid layer beneath the pavement.
(The approximate slab thickness obtained from the first run is used in calculating the damage
during different seasons of the year.)
Approximately 3 to 4 iterations will be required (i.e., after a first run with a trial k-value,
a trial thickness is obtained). The "Calculate seasonal k-value" button can then be used to
calculate a seasonally adjusted k-value. This is exported back to the "Input Form" sheet.
The slab thickness is calculated again using the new k-value. This changes the seasonal
adjusted k-value and the procedure need to be repeated again. This is done till the
change in thickness does not change the seasonally adjusted k-value.
Detailed information on k-value is provided in the "k-Value Information" Sheet.
Page 1
l
l
l
l
l
l
III.
A traffic calculation should be performed before the first run. This will result in
a more appropriate slab thickness for the seasonal k-value computation.
After all the design information has been entered, clicking on the "Calculate" button
displays the design thickness at the bottom of the Input Form.
The above calculation is performed in the "Calculation Sheet" sheet. The "Calculation Sheet"
also provides the design traffic for slab thicknesses varying from 7 in to 15 inches, in increments
of 0.5 in. The next row is not locked, to enable the user to change any variable and
observe its effects on the design traffic. The last row is locked and represents the thickness
for the traffic and other inputs provided by the user in the Input Form.
Sensitivity analysis can also be performed from the Input Form. A desired thickness
can be input, or the calculated thickness for the input design variable can be imported.
The sensitivity analysis produces a graph on a sheet labeled "Sensitivity (Other)."
The sensitivity for thickness vs. traffic is created automatically on the
"Sensitivity (Thickness)" sheet.
The actual data for the sensitivity analysis is contained in a sheet called "Sensitivity Sheet;"
this sheet is hidden.
The Input Form also contains a link to the "Faulting Check" sheet for JRCP and
JPCP. For CRCP, the "Faulting Check" sheet and the "Corner Break Check" sheet
remain hidden.
Red dots or flags at the top right corners of cells indicate that a note is attached to that cell.
This note can be read by moving the mouse over that cell.
NOTE: This spreadsheet was created in Excel95. Due to compatibility problems with Excel97,
the larger notes are partially cut off (because Excel97 displays notes with fixed sizes as default).
To see the entire note, a macro is written in this spreadsheet to change the size of notes
that are bigger than the comment box (The notes in Excel97 are now called comments).
However, the user must run this macro by pressing "ctrl+j" each time the spreadsheet is
opened in Excel97. This command does not affect spreadsheets in Excel95.
Certain cells are locked to prevent accidental erasure. Cells can only be locked when the
sheet is also protected, so some sheets are protected. To unprotect a sheet, go to Tools
on the menu, select Protection and select Unprotect Sheet. This creates the potential
for accidental erasure, so it is useful to keep the sheet protected. To reprotect the
sheet, select Tools, Protection, Protect Sheet and select OK without entering a password.
The workbook should not be protected because some of the Excel basic programs (macros)
need the workbook to be unprotected to be executed.
For the same reason, the "Sensitivity Sheet" (which is hidden) and the "Saved Data"
sheet should not be protected. Hidden sheets can be viewed by using Format, Sheet, Unhide,
or Edit, Sheet, Unhide from the menu.
Faulting Check Sheet
l
l
l
l
For jointed pavements, the Input Form links to the "Faulting Check" sheet. All cells
need to be input in this sheet. The cells that do not need to be input are hidden using
the outlining ("+") at the left of the sheet. To observe the values at this location, the sheet has
to be unprotected and the "+" clicked.
Each time a cell value is changed, the "Calculate" button needs to be clicked to calculate
faulting, which is displayed at the bottom of the sheet. This is then compared with the criteria
set at the bottom of the sheet to "PASS" or "FAIL" the design.
The criteria can be changed by changing the values in the criteria table.
The doweled and nondoweled sheets are designed independent of each other to provide
the user control over the individual design. For example, the user may decide to provide
edgedrains for the nondoweled design, which will change the drainage coefficient, C d.
While making a one-on-one comparison between the faulting check for the doweled and
nondoweled designs, the user needs to ensure that all values are comparable.
Corner break checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements. This sheet
Page 2
can be accessed by clicking on the "Corner Break Check" button.
Page 3
Table 14. Modulus of elasticity and coefficient of friction for various base types.
Notes:
Base Type or
Interface Treatment
Modulus of
Elasticity
(psi)
Peak Friction Coefficient
low
mean
high
Fine-grained soil
3,000 - 40,000
0.5
1.3
2.0
Sand
10,000 - 25,000
0.5
0.8
1.0
Aggregate
15,000 - 45,000
0.7
1.4
2.0
Polyethylene sheeting
NA
0.5
0.6
1.0
Lime-stabilized clay
20,000 - 70,000
3.0
NA
5.3
Cement-treated gravel
(500 + CS) * 1000
8.0
34
63
Asphalt-treated gravel
300,000 - 600,000
3.7
5.8
10
Lean concrete without
curing compound
(500 + CS) * 1000
Lean concrete with single
or double wax curing
compound
(500 + CS) * 1000
> 36
3.5
CS = compressive strength, psi
Low, mean, and high measured peak coefficients of friction summarized from various references
are shown above.
Page 4
4.5
Fine-Grained Subgrade
Edge
Drains
No
Yes
Notes:
Coarse-Grained Subgrade
Precip.
Level
Nonpermeable
Base
Permeable
Base
Nonpermeable
Base
Permeable
Base
Wet
0.70-0.90
0.85-0.95
0.75-0.95
0.90-1.00
Dry
0.90-1.10
0.95-1.10
0.90-1.15
1.00-1.15
Wet
0.75-0.95
1.00-1.10
0.90-1.10
1.05-1.15
Dry
0.95-1.15
1.10-1.20
1.10-1.20
1.15-1.20
1.
Fine subgrade
= A-1 through A-3 classes;
Coarse subgrade = A-4 through A-8 classes.
2. Permeable Base = k = 1000 ft/day (305 m/day) or uniformity coefficient (Cu) 6.
3. Wet climate
= Precipitation > 25 in/year (635 mm/year);
Dry climate
= Precipitation 25 in/year (635 mm/year).
4.
Select midpoint of range and use other drainage features (adequacy of cross slopes, depth of
ditches, presence of daylighting, relative drainability of base course, bathtub design, etc.) to adjust upward
or downward.
Page 5
ALABAMA
Birmingham
Mobile
Montgomery
ALASKA
Anchorage
Fairbanks
King Salmon
ARIZONA
Flagstaff
Phoenix
Tucson
ARKANSAS
Little Rock
CALIFORNIA
Bakersfield
Fresno
Los Angeles
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
Santa Barbara
COLORADO
Colorado Spring
Denver
CONNECTICUT
Hartford
DC
Washington
DELAWARE
Wilmington
FLORIDA
Jacksonville
Miami
Orlando
Tallahassee
Tampa
West Palm Beac
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Augusta
Macon
62.2
67.5
67.5
52.2
64.6
49.2
35.3
25.9
32.8
15.2
10.4
19.3
45.4
71.2
68.0
20.9
7.1
11.1
61.9
49.2
65.6
62.5
62.6
60.6
63.8
56.6
58.9
5.7
10.5
12.1
17.1
9.3
19.7
16.2
48.9
50.3
15.4
15.3
49.8
44.4
57.5
39.0
54.0
41.4
68.0
75.6
72.4
67.2
72.0
74.6
52.8
57.6
47.8
64.6
46.7
59.7
61.2
63.2
64.7
48.6
43.1
44.9
KANSAS
7.2 Topeka
54.1
9.0 Wichita
56.4
6.7 KENTUCKY
Lexington
54.9
6.9 Louisville
56.2
5.5 LOUISIANA
10.8 Baton Rouge
67.5
Lake Charles
68.0
7.1 New Orleans
68.2
6.3 Shreveport
65.4
8.2 MAINE
Caribou
38.9
7.9 Portland
45.0
MARYLAND
6.4 Baltimore
55.1
6.4 MASSACHUSETTS
7.5 Boston
51.5
8.1 Worcester
46.8
6.9 MICHIGAN
10.5 Detroit
48.6
6.1 Flint
46.8
Grand Rapids
47.5
10.1 MINNESOTA
8.8 Duluth
38.2
Minneapolis
44.7
9.2 MISSISSIPPI
Jackson
64.6
9.3 MISSOURI
Kansas City
56.3
9.2 MONTANA
Great Falls
44.7
8.1 NEBRASKA
9.2 Omaha
49.5
8.6 NEVADA
6.4 Las Vegas
66.3
8.5 Reno
49.4
9.4 NEW JERSEY
Atlantic City
53.1
9.1 NEW MEXICO
6.5 Albuquerque
56.2
7.7 NEW YORK
28.6
40.1
10.1
12.3
45.7
43.6
7.1
8.3
55.8
53.0
59.7
43.8
7.7
8.6
8.2
8.5
36.6
43.8
11.2
8.7
41.8
9.2
43.8
47.6
12.4
12.4
4.0
29.2
34.4
10.2
10.6
9.7
29.7
26.4
11.2
10.6
52.8
7.4
35.2
10.7
15.2
12.8
29.9
10.6
4.2
7.5
9.2
6.5
41.9
10.1
8.1
9.0
Page 6
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma City 59.9
Tulsa
60.3
OREGON
Medford
53.6
Portland
53.0
Salem
52.0
PENNSYLVANIA
Harrisburg
53.0
Philadelphia
54.3
Pittsburgh
50.3
RHODE ISLAND
Providence
50.3
SOUTH CAROLINA
Charleston
64.8
Columbia
63.3
SOUTH DAKOTA
Huron
44.7
Rapid City
46.7
TENNESSEE
Chattanooga
59.4
Knoxville
58.9
Memphis
61.8
Nashville
59.2
TEXAS
Amarillo
57.2
Brownsville
73.6
Corpus Christi
72.1
Dallas
66.0
El Paso
63.4
Galveston
69.6
Houston
68.3
Lubbock
59.9
Midland
63.5
San Antonio
68.7
Waco
67.0
Wichita Falls
63.5
UTAH
Salt Lake City
51.7
VERMONT
Burlington
44.1
VIRGINIA
Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph
Mean Annual Precipitation, in
Location
Mean Annual Temperature, °F
Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph
Mean Annual Precipitation, in
Location
Mean Annual Temperature, °F
Mean Annual Wind Speed, mph
Mean Annual Precipitation, in
Location
Mean Annual Temperature, °F
Table 15. Mean annual temperature, precipitation, and wind speed for selected U.S. cities.
8.9 Norfolk
12.1 Richmond
12.1 Roanoke
9.7 WASHINGTON
9.7 Olympia
Seattle
7.5 Spokane
7.5 WEST VIRGINIA
7.8 Charleston
8.8 Huntington
WISCONSIN
10.3 Green Bay
12.4 Madison
Milwaukee
9.8 WYOMING
10.7 Casper
8.7 Cheyenne
10.1
10.0
59.5
57.7
56.1
45.2
44.1
39.2
10.6
7.6
8.2
49.6
52.7
47.2
51.0
38.8
16.7
6.7
9.0
8.8
54.8
55.2
42.4
40.7
6.4
6.5
43.6
45.2
46.1
28.0
30.8
30.9
10.1
9.8
11.6
45.2
45.7
11.4
13.3
13.0
12.9
Source: National Climatic Data Center, 1986
Page 7
Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide
Reference: LTPP DATA ANALYSIS - Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete
Pavement Performance Prediction
I. General
Agency: INCO
Street Address:
City: SOROAKO
State:
Project Number: 35391
PCC Properties
28-day Mean Modulus of Rupture, (S'c)':
Elastic Modulus of Slab, Ec:
Poisson's Ratio for Concrete, m:
26.2
ft
JRCP
Effective Joint Spacing:
314.964 in
Edge Support
1,000,000 psi
9.8 in
1.4
90.0
0.30
Conventional 12-ft wide traffic lane
●
Conventional 12-ft wide traffic lane + tied PCC
2-ft widened slab w/conventional 12-ft traffic lane
Reliability and Standard Deviation
Reliability Level (R):
Overall Standard Deviation, S0:
JRCP
CRCP
725 psi
3,500,000 psi
0.15
Base Properties
Elastic Modulus of Base, Eb:
Design Thickness of Base, Hb:
Slab-Base Friction Factor, f:
Joint Spacing:
%
Edge Support Factor:
0.94
Sensitivity Analysis
Climatic Properties
Mean Annual Wind Speed, WIND:
Mean Annual Air Temperature, TEMP:
Mean Annual Precipitation, PRECIP:
45.0
86.0
25.4
mph
o
F
in
Subgrade k-Value
Slab Thickness used for
Sensitivity Analysis:
15.40 in
Modulus of Rupture
Elastic Modulus (Slab)
Elastic Modulus (Base)
Base Thickness
k-Value
Joint Spacing
200 psi/in
Design ESALs
11.3 million
Calculated Slab Thickness for Above Inputs:
Reliability
15.40 in
●
Standard Deviation
Rigid Pavement Design - Based on AASHTO Supplemental Guide
Reference: LTPP DATA ANALYSIS - Phase I: Validation of Guidelines for k-Value Selection and Concrete
Pavement Performance Prediction
Slab Thickness Design
Pavement Type
18-kip ESALs Over Initial Performance Period (million)
Initial Serviceability
Terminal Serviceability
28-day Mean PCC Modulus of Rupture
Elastic Modulus of Slab
Elastic Modulus of Base
Base Thickness
Mean Effective k-Value
Reliability Level
Overall Standard Deviation
Mean Annual Air Temperature
Mean Annual Precipitation
86
25.4
o
Maximum Positive Temperature Differential
28.53
million
psi
psi
psi
in.
psi/in
%
Temperature Differential
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Period
Description
Subgrade k-Value, psi
F
in
o
F
Seasonally Adjusted Modulus of Subgrade Reaction
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Adjusted for Rigid Layer
and Fill Section
165
psi/in
0
psi/in
20
64
1
100%
100%
years
Traffic
Performance Period
Two-Way ADT
Number of Lanes in Design Direction
Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane
Percent Trucks in Design Direction
Vehicle Class Percent of
ADT
1
Modulus of
Rupture = 725 psi
Elastic Modulus of
Concrete =
3,500,000 psi
Elastic Modulus of
Base = 1,000,000
psi
Base Thickness =
9.843 in
14.00
Design Traffic, MESALs
12.00
10.00
k-Value of
subgrade = 200
psi/in
Joint Spacing =
8.00
26.247 ft
6.00
Reliability = 90 %
4.00
Standard
Deviation = 0.2 to
0.6
Slab Thickness =
15.4 in
2.00
0.00
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
Standard Deviation
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
Sensitivity Analysis (Thickness)
Design Traffic, MESALs
10.00
1.00
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
0.10
Slab Thickness, in
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
Faulting
DOWELED PAVEMENT
Dowel Diameter:
Kd:
Es:
NONDOWELED PAVEMENT
1.26 in
1,500,000 psi/in
29,000,000 psi
###
###
###
Base/Slab Frictional Restraint
Stabilized Base
●
Aggregate Base or LCB w/ bond breaker
ALPHA:
TRANGE:
e:
D:
P:
T:
0.000006 /oF
86.0
0.00015
15.40
9,000
0.45
Days90:
F
strain
in
lbf
Base Type
●
###
o
D:
17 days
15.40 in
#
###
###
###
###
Base Type
Stabilized Base
Stabilized Base
Unstabilized Base
FI:
CESAL:
Age:
Cd:
●
Unstabilized Base
91 oF-days
11.25 million
20.0 years
0.90
Faulting (doweled)
FI:
CESAL:
Age:
Cd:
Faulting (nondoweled)
in
Faulting Check -
in
Faulting Check -
Recommended critical mean joint faulting levels for design (Table 28)
Joint Spacing
< 25 ft
> 25 ft
91 oF-days #
11.25 million
###
20.0 years
D
0.90
###
###
###
ND
###
Critical Mean Joint Faulting
0.06 in
0.13 in
###
###
Note: Joint load position stress checks need to be performed only for nondoweled pavements
Only two numbers need to be entered in this sheet:
Temperature gradient
Tensile stress at top of slab
Step 1:
Total Negative Temperature Differential
Slab Thickness:
15.40 in
Total Negative Temperature Differential:
9.1 oF
Construction Curling and Moisture Gradient Temperature Differential
F/in
Enter temperature gradient:
o
(enter positive value from below)
For temperature gradient use:
Wet Climate:
0 to 2 oF/in
(Annual Precipitation >= 30 in or
Thornthwaite Moisture Index > 0)
Dry Climate:
1 to 3 oF/in
(Annual Precipitation < 30 in or
Thornthwaite Moisture Index < 0)
9.1
Total Effective Negative Temp. Differential:
F
o
Step 2:
Use one or more of the following charts to estimate the tensile stress at top of slab.
Note that the charts show the variation of tensile stress with negative temperature differential
for slab thicknesses ranging from 7 to 13 in. These are plotted for a base course thickness
of 6 in. The six charts represent three k-values (100, 250 and 500 psi/in) and two values for the
elastic modulus of the base (25,000 psi and 1,000,000 psi). Use judgment to
extrapolate the value of the tensile stress at the top of the slab from these charts.
Enter Tensile Stress at Top of Slab:
psi
(use charts below)
Step 3:
Compare the above tensile stress with the maximum tensile stress at the bottom of the slab for
which the slab is designed. For the given inputs and the above thickness, this value is
232
psi
The slab is designed for a tensile stress of
232 psi.
If the tensile stress at the top of the slab (obtained from the charts below and entered above) is
less than the design stress, the design is acceptable. If the check fails, new inputs have to be provided.
Corner Break Check:
NOTE: The k-value used in this design procedure is not a composite k, as in the original AASHTO
design procedure. The k-value to be input in the "Input Form" and in the "Seasonal k-Value" sheet
is the actual subgrade soil modulus of subgrade reaction.
The k-value input required for this design method is determined using the following steps:
Step 1. Select a subgrade soil k-value for each season, using any of the three following methods:
(a) Correlations with soil type and other soil properties or tests.
(b) Deflection testing and backcalculation (recommended).
(c) Plate bearing tests.
Detailed information for Step 1 is included below.
Step 2. The "Seasonal k-Value" Sheet can then be used to determine a seasonally adjusted
effective k-value.
Step 3. This seasonally adjusted effective k-value can then be adjusted for the effects of
a shallow rigid layer, if present, or an embankment above the natural subgrade using the
"Fill/Rigid Adjustment" sheet.
Method A -- Correlations. Guidelines are presented for selecting an appropriate k-value based
on soil classification, moisture level, density, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), or Dynamic Cone
Penetrometer (DCP) data. These correlation methods are anticipated to be used routinely for
design. The k-values obtained from soil type or tests correlation methods may need to be
adjusted for embankment above the subgrade or a shallow rigid layer beneath the subgrade.
The k-values and correlations for cohesive soils (A-4 through A-7): The bearing capacity of
cohesive soils is strongly influenced by their degree of saturation (S r, percent), which is a function
3
of water content (w, percent), dry density (g, lb/ft ), and specific gravity (Gs):
Recommended k-values for each fine-grained soil type as a function of degree of saturation are
shown in Figure 40. Each line represents the middle of a range of reasonable values for k. For
any given soil type and degree of saturation, the range of values is about + 40 psi/in [11 kPa/mm].
A reasonable lower limit for k at 100 percent saturation is considered to be 25 psi/in [7 kPa/mm ].
Thus, for example, an A-6 soil might be expected to exhibit k-values between about 180 and 260
psi/in [49 and 70 kPa/mm] at 50 percent saturation, and k-values between about 25 and 85 psi/in
[7 and 23 kPa/mm] at 100 percent saturation.
Two different types of materials can be classified as A-4: predominantly silty materials (at least 75
percent passing the #200 sieve, possibly organic), and mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel (up to 64
percent retained on #200 sieve). The former may have a density between about 90 and 105 lb/ft
3
3
[1442 and 1682 kg/m ], and a CBR between about 4 and 8. The latter may have a density
3
3
between about 100 and 125 lb/ft [1602 and 2002 kg/m ], and a CBR between about 5 and 15.
The line labeled A-4 in Figure B-4 is more representative of the former group. If the material in
question is A-4, but possesses the properties of the stronger subset of materials in the A-4 class,
a higher k-value at any given degree of saturation (for example, along the line labeled A-7-6 in
Figure 40) is appropriate.
Recommended k-value ranges for fine-grained soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and
CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.
The k -values and correlations for cohesionless soils (A-1 and A-3): The bearing capacity of
cohesionless materials is fairly insensitive to moisture variation and is predominantly a function of
their void ratio and overall stress state. Recommended k-value ranges for cohesionless soils,
along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in Table 11.
Figure 40. The k-value versus degree of saturation for cohesive soils
Table 11. Recommended k-value ranges for various soil types.
AASHTO
Class
Description
Unified
Class
Dry
Density
3
(lb/ft )
CBR
(perce
nt)
k Value
(psi/in)
Coarse-grained Soils:
A-1-a, well graded
gravel
GW, GP
A-1-a, poorly graded
125 - 140
60 - 80
300 - 450
120 - 130
35 - 60
300 - 400
A-1-b
coarse sand
SW
110 - 130
20 - 40
200 - 400
A-3
fine sand
SP
105 - 120
15 - 25
150 - 300
A-2 Soils (granular materials with high fines):
A-2-4, gravelly
silty gravel
A-2-5, gravelly
silty sandy gravel
A-2-4, sandy
silty sand
A-2-5, sandy
silty gravelly sand
A-2-6, gravelly
clayey gravel
A-2-7, gravelly
clayey sandy gravel
A-2-6, sandy
clayey sand
A-2-7, sandy
clayey gravelly
sand
GM
130 - 145
40 - 80
300 - 500
SM
120 - 135
20 - 40
300 - 400
GC
120 - 140
20 - 40
200 - 450
SC
105 - 130
10 - 20
150 - 350
90 - 105
4-8
25 - 165 *
100 - 125
5 - 15
40 - 220 *
Fine-grained Soils:
A-4
silt
ML, OL
silt/sand/
gravel mixture
A-5
poorly graded
silt
MH
80 - 100
4-8
25 - 190 *
A-6
plastic clay
CL
100 - 125
5 - 15
25 - 255 *
A-7-5
moderately plastic
elastic clay
CL, OL
90 - 125
4 - 15
25 - 215 *
A-7-6
highly plastic
elastic clay
CH, OH
80 - 110
3-5
40 - 220 *
* k-value of fine-grained soil is highly dependent on degree of saturation. See Figure 40.
These recommended k-value ranges apply to a homogeneous soil layer at least 10 ft [3 m] thick. If an
embankment layer less than 10 ft [3 m] thick exists over a softer subgrade, the k-value for the underlying
soil should be estimated from this table and adjusted for the type and thickness of embankment material
using Step 3. If a layer of bedrock exists within 10 ft [3 m] of the top of the soil, the k should be adjusted
3
3
using Step 3. 1 lb/ft =16.018 kg/m , 1 psi/in = 0.271 kPa/mm
The k-values and correlations for A-2 soils: Soils in the A-2 class are all granular materials
falling between A-1 and A-3. Although it is difficult to predict the behavior of such a wide variety of
materials, the available data indicate that in terms of bearing capacity, A-2 materials behave
similarly to cohesionless materials of comparable density. Recommended k-value ranges for A-2
soils, along with typical ranges of dry density and CBR for each soil type, are summarized in
Table 11.
Correlation of k-value to California Bearing Ratio: Figure 41 illustrates the approximate range
of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given CBR.
Correlation of k-values to penetration rate by Dynamic Cone Penetrometer: Figure 42
illustrates the range of k-values that might be expected for a soil with a given penetration rate
(inches per blow) measured with a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. This is a rapid hand-held testing
device that can be used to quickly test dozens of locations along an alignment. The DCP can also
penetrate AC surfaces and surface treatments to test the foundation below.
Assignment of k-values to seasons. Among the factors that should be considered in selecting
seasonal k-values are the seasonal movement of the water table, seasonal precipitation levels,
winter frost depths, number of freeze-thaw cycles, and the extent to which the subgrade will be
protected from frost by embankment material. A "frozen" k may not be appropriate for winter,
even in a cold climate, if the frost will not reach and remain in a substantial thickness of the
subgrade throughout the winter. If it is anticipated that a substantial depth (e.g., three feet or
more) of the subgrade will be frozen, a k-value of 500 psi/in [135 kPa/mm] would be an
appropriate "frozen" k.
The seasonal variation in degree of saturation is difficult to predict, but in locations where a water
table is constantly present at a depth of less than about 10 ft [3 m], it is reasonable to expect that
fine-grained subgrades will remain at least 70 to 90 percent saturated, and may be completely
saturated for substantial periods in the spring. County soil reports can provide data on the
position of the high-water table (i.e., the typical depth to the water table at the time of the year that
it is at its highest). Unfortunately, county soil reports do not provide data on the variation in depth
to the water table throughout the year.
Figure 41. Approximate relationship of k-value range to CBR.
Figure 42. Approximate relationship of k-value range to DCP penetration rate.
Method B — Deflection Testing and Backcalculation Methods. These methods are suitable
for determining k-value for design of overlays of existing pavements, for design of a reconstructed
pavement on existing alignments, or for design of similar pavements in the same general location
on the same type of subgrade. An agency may also use backcalculation methods to develop
correlations between nondestructive deflection testing results and subgrade types and properties.
Cut and fill sections are likely to yield different k-values. No embankment or rigid layer adjustment
is required for backcalculated k-values if these characteristics are similar for the pavement being
tested and the pavement being designed, but backcalculated dynamic k-values do need to be
reduced by a factor of two to estimate a static elastic k-value for use in design which is required in
this catalog.
An appropriate design subgrade elastic k-value for use as an input to this design method is
determined by the following steps:
1.
Measure deflections on an in-service concrete or composite (AC-overlaid PCC) pavement
with the same or similar subgrade as the pavement being designed.
2.
Compute the appropriate AREA of each deflection basin.
3.
Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the radius of relative stiffness, l.
4.
Compute an initial estimate (assuming an infinite slab size) of the subgrade k-value.
5.
Compute adjustment factors for the maximum deflection d0 and the initially estimated l to
account for the finite slab size.
6.
Adjust the initially estimated k-value to account for the finite slab size.
7.
Compute the mean backcalculated subgrade k-value for all of the deflection basins
considered.
8.
Compute the estimated mean static k-value for use in design for the specific season during
the testing.
9.
Determine the effective seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed
above.
These steps are described below, with the relevant equations for bare concrete and composite
(asphalt concrete over concrete slab) pavements given for each step.
Measure deflections. Measure slab deflection basins along the project at an interval sufficient to
adequately assess conditions. Intervals of 100 to 1000 ft [30 to 300 m] are typical. Measure
deflections with sensors located at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and
1524 mm] from the center of the load. Measure deflections in the outer wheel path. A heavy-load
deflection device (e.g., Falling Weight Deflectometer) and a load magnitude of 9,000 lbf [40 kN]
are recommended. ASTM D4694 and D4695 provide additional guidance on deflection testing.
Compute AREA. For a bare concrete pavement, compute the AREA 7 of each deflection basin
d8
AREA7 = 4 + 6
d 12
+ 5
d 18
+ 6
d 24
+ 9
d 36
+ 18
d 60
+ 12
adequately assess conditions. Intervals of 100 to 1000 ft [30 to 300 m] are typical. Measure
deflections with sensors located at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and
1524 mm] from the center of the load. Measure deflections in the outer wheel path. A heavy-load
deflection device (e.g., Falling Weight Deflectometer) and a load magnitude of 9,000 lbf [40 kN]
are recommended. ASTM D4694 and D4695 provide additional guidance on deflection testing.
Compute AREA. For a bare concrete pavement, compute the AREA 7 of each deflection basin
d8
d0
AREA7 = 4 + 6
d 12
d0
+ 5
d 18
d0
+ 6
d 24
d0
+ 9
d 36
d0
+ 18
d 60
d0
+ 12
using the following equation:
where d0 = deflection in center of loading plate, inches
di =
deflections at 0, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 60 in [0, 203, 305, 457, 610, 915, and 1524
mm] from plate center, inches
For a composite pavement, compute the AREA5 of each deflection basin using the following
d 18
AREA5 = 3 + 6
d 12
d 24
+ 9
d 12
d 36
+ 18
d 12
d 60
+ 12
d 12
[27]
equation:
Estimate l assuming an infinite slab size. The radius of relative stiffness for a bare
concrete pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be estimated using the following equation:
The radius of relative stiffness for a composite pavement (assuming an infinite slab) may be
48 AREA5
158.40
- 0.476
2.220
ln
est =
[29]
estimated using the following equation:
Estimate k assuming an infinite slab size. For a bare concrete pavement, compute an
k est =
P d *0
d 0 est
2
[30]
initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:
where k = backcalculated dynamic k-value, psi/in
P = load, lb
d0 = deflection measured at center of load plate, inch
lest
= estimated radius of relative stiffness, inches, from previous step
[26]
k est =
P d *0
d 0 est
2
initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:
where k = backcalculated dynamic k-value, psi/in
P = load, lb
d0 = deflection measured at center of load plate, inch
lest
*
0
d
= estimated radius of relative stiffness, inches, from previous step
= nondimensional coefficient of deflection at center of load plate:
-0.14707 e
*
d 0 = 0.1245 e
k est =
-0.0 75 65est
P d *12
d 12 est
[31]
[32]
2
For a composite pavement, compute an initial estimate of the k-value using the following equation:
d12 = deflection measured 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate, inch
lest
d
*
12
= estimated radius of relative stiffness, in, from previous step
= nondimensional coefficient of deflection 12 in [305 mm] from center of load plate:
-0.79432e
*
d 12 = 0.12188 e
-0 .0 7 0 7 4est
[33]
Compute adjustment factors for d0 and l for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and
composite pavements, the initial estimate of l is used to compute the following adjustment factors
AF d 0
= 1 - 1.15085 e-0.71878
AF = 1 - 0.89434 e
0 .8 01 5 1
L
est
1 .0 4 8 3 1
L
-0.61662
est
[34]
[35]
to d0 and l to account for the finite size of the slabs tested:
where, if the slab length is less than or equal to twice the slab width, L is the square root of the
product of the slab length and width, both in inches, or if the slab length is greater than twice the
if Ll 2 * L w , L = Ll L w
[36]
if Ll > 2 * L w , L = 2 * Ll
width, L is the product of the square root of two and the slab length in inches:
Adjust k for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and composite pavements, adjust the
product of the slab length and width, both in inches, or if the slab length is greater than twice the
if Ll 2 * L w , L = Ll L w
if Ll > 2 * L w , L = 2 * Ll
width, L is the product of the square root of two and the slab length in inches:
Adjust k for finite slab size. For both bare concrete and composite pavements, adjust the
k=
k est
AF AF d 0
2
[37]
initially estimated k-value using the following equation:
Compute mean dynamic k-value. Exclude from the calculation of the mean k-value any
unrealistic values (i.e., less than 50 psi/in [14 kPa/mm] or greater than 1500 psi/in [407 kPa/mm]),
as well as any individual values that appear to be significantly out of line with the rest of the
values.
Compute the estimated mean static k-value for design. Divide the mean dynamic k-value by
two to estimate the mean static k-value for design.
A blank worksheet for computation of k from deflection data and example computations of k from
deflection basins measured on two pavements, one bare concrete and the other composite, are
given in Table 12.
Seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values. The design k-value determined from
backcalculation as described above represents the k-value for the season in which the deflection
testing was conducted. An agency may wish to conduct deflection testing on selected projects in
different seasons of the year to assess the seasonal variation in backcalculated k-values for
different types of subgrades.
Table 12.
Table
Table12.
A2. Determination of design subgrade k-value from deflection measurements.
BARE CONCRETE PAVEMENT
Step
Equation
Calculated Value
Example
d0
______________
0.00418
d8
______________
0.00398
d12
______________
0.00384
d18
______________
0.00361
d24
______________
0.00336
d36
______________
0.00288
d60
______________
0.00205
AREA7
[26]
45.0
Initial estimate of l
[28]
40.79
Nondimensional d0*
[31]
0.1237
and initial estimate of k
[30]
160
Afd
0
[34]
0.867
AFl
[35]
0.934
Adjusted k
[37]
212
Mean dynamic k
Mean static k for design
212
106
COMPOSITE PAVEMENT
Step
Equation
Calculated Value
Example
d12
______________
0.00349
d18
______________
0.00332
d24
______________
0.00313
d36
______________
0.00273
d60
______________
0.00202
AREA5
[27]
37.8
Initial estimate of l
[29]
48.83
Nondimensional d12*
[33]
0.1189
and initial estimate of k
[32]
128
Afd
0
[34]
0.823
AFl
[35]
0.896
Adjusted k
[37]
195
Mean dynamic k
Mean static k for design
195
97
Method C -- Plate Bearing Test Methods. The subgrade or embankment elastic k-value may
be determined from either of two types of plate bearing tests: repetitive static plate loading
(AASHTO T221, ASTM D1195) or nonrepetitive static plate loading (AASHTO T222, ASTM
D1196). These test methods were developed for a variety of purposes, and do not provide explicit
guidance on the determination of the required k-value input to the design procedure described
here.
For the purpose of concrete pavement design, the recommended subgrade input parameter is
the static elastic k-value. This may be determined from either a repetitive or nonrepetitive test on
the prepared subgrade or on a prepared test embankment, provided that the embankment is at
least 10 ft [3 m] thick. Otherwise, the tests should be conducted on the subgrade, and the k-value
obtained should be adjusted to account for the thickness and density of the embankment, using
the nomograph provided in Step 3.
In a repetitive test, the elastic k-value is determined from the ratio of load to elastic
deformation (the recoverable portion of the total deformation measured). In a nonrepetitive test,
the load-deformation ratio at a deformation of 0.05 in [1.25 mm] is considered to represent the
elastic k-value, according to extensive research by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Note also that a 30-in-diameter [762-mm-diameter] plate should be used to determine the
elastic static k-value for use in design. Smaller diameter plates will yield substantially higher kvalues, which are not appropriate for use in this design procedure. An adequate number of tests
should be run to ensure coverage over the project length. The mean of the tests becomes the
static elastic k-value for the season of testing. This value is then used to determine the effective
seasonally adjusted elastic k-value considering the factors discussed above.
Season
Number of Months Subgrade k-Value,
psi/in
Total:
0
W18,
Relative Damage
millions
21.72
19.19
23.12
22.31
in the Season
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mean Damage:
W18:
Seasonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value (psi/in):
0
0
165
Adjustment for the Effects of Embankment and/or Shallow Rigid Layer:
The seasonally adjusted subgrade k-value is to be adjusted using the following nomograph if:
(a) fill material will be placed above the natural subgrade, and/or
(b) a rigid layer (e.g., bedrock or hardpan clay) is present at a depth of 10 ft or less beneath
the existing subgrade surface.
Note: The rigid layer adjustment should only be applied if the subgrade k was determined
on the basis of soil type or similar correlations. If the k-value was determined from
nondestructive deflection testing or from plate bearing tests, the effect of a rigid layer,
if present at a depth of less than 10 ft, is already represented in the k-value obtained.
Seasonally Adjusted Subgrade k-Value:
psi/in
If required, use the nomograph below to adjust the above subgrade k-value for fill and/or
rigid layer and enter the adjusted value here:
psi/in
Size image for better resolution.
Traffic Worksheet
Performance Period:
Two-Way Daily Traffic (ADT):
Number of Lanes in Design Direction:
Percent of All Trucks in Design Lane:
Percent Trucks in Design Direction:
Vehicle Percent of ADT Annual %
Class (Total = 100%)
Growth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Sum of % ADT:
(Should be 100)
100.0%
100.0
4.0%
20 years
64
1
100%
100%
###
###
###
Average Initial Annual % Accumulated
Truck Factor
Growth in
ESALs
(ESALs/truck) Truck Factor (millions)
16.257
0.0%
Calculated ESALs:
11.25
11.25
###
###
million
###
###
Saved Data
Select row to be exported and click the "Export" button.
ID
Clear
Example
INCO
County
BALDWIN
CLEBURNE
COOSA
CULLMAN
ELMORE
HOUSTON
JACKSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
LAUDERDALE
LEE
SUMTER
TUSCALOOSA
ANCHORAGE
ANCHORAGE
FAIRBANKS
MATANUSKA-SUSITNA
MARICOPA
MARICOPA
MARICOPA
MOHAVE
MOHAVE
MOHAVE
MOHAVE
PIMA
PIMA
SANTA CRUZ
SANTA CRUZ
YAVAPAI
YAVAPAI
ARKANSAS
ASHLEY
BENTON
CRAIGHEAD
CRAIGHEAD
JEFFERSON
LONOKE
PULASKI
PULASKI
PULASKI
SEBASTIAN
ST FRANCIS
WHITE
WHITE
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
Colorado
BUTTE
CALAVERAS
DEL NORTE
HUMBOLDT
HUMBOLDT
IMPERIAL
IMPERIAL
KERN
KINGS
LAKE
LOS ANGELES
NAPA
NEVADA
PLACER
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
RIVERSIDE
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN BERNARDINO
SAN DIEGO
SAN DIEGO
SAN DIEGO
SAN DIEGO
SAN JOAQUIN
SAN JOAQUIN
SAN JOAQUIN
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN MATEO
SANTA BARBARA
SHASTA
SISKIYOU
SISKIYOU
TUOLUMNE
YOLO
ADAMS
ADAMS
ARAPAHOE
BENT
BENT
DELTA
EL PASO
GARFIELD
GARFIELD
LARIMER
LOGAN
MESA
MOFFAT
PUEBLO
RIO BLANCO
WELD
HARTFORD
HARTFORD
NEW LONDON
TOLLAND
KENT
KENT
KENT
NEW CASTLE
SUSSEX
BAY
CLAY
DADE
DADE
DUVAL
GADSDEN
HERNANDO
HILLSBOROUGH
HILLSBOROUGH
JACKSON
LEE
MARTIN
NASSAU
OKALOOSA
OKALOOSA
ORANGE
PALM BEACH
PALM BEACH
POLK
POLK
POLK
ST LUCIE
ST LUCIE
VOLUSIA
VOLUSIA
VOLUSIA
VOLUSIA
VOLUSIA
BARTOW
BRYAN
CAMDEN
CAMDEN
CAMDEN
CANDLER
CRISP
DAWSON
EARLY
FRANKLIN
HALL
HARALSON
HOUSTON
OCONEE
PICKENS
SPALDING
TALIAFERRO
THOMAS
THOMAS
TREUTLEN
WALTON
WARREN
HAWAII
HAWAII
MAUI
MAUI
ADAMS
BANNOCK
BEAR LAKE
BONNER
CASSIA
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
JEROME
KOOTENAI
KOOTENAI
PAYETTE
POWER
CHAMPAIGN
CLINTON
CLINTON
CLINTON
HENRY
JEFFERSON
MC LEAN
MC LEAN
OGLE
PEORIA
PEORIA
ROCK ISLAND
ST CLAIR
STEPHENSON
STEPHENSON
WILLIAMSON
ALLEN
BENTON
DELAWARE
GRANT
HAMILTON
LA PORTE
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Indiana
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Iowa
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kansas
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Kentucky
Louisiana
Louisiana
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maine
Maryland
Maryland
LA PORTE
MARION
MARSHALL
POSEY
POSEY
SPENCER
SPENCER
TIPPECANOE
VANDERBURGH
CEDAR
CLINTON
FRANKLIN
HAMILTON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
LINN
SCOTT
WORTH
WRIGHT
DICKINSON
DICKINSON
FINNEY
FORD
FRANKLIN
JOHNSON
LINCOLN
MARSHALL
RENO
SHAWNEE
STAFFORD
WYANDOTTE
BARREN
BULLITT
CLAY
FAYETTE
FAYETTE
OWSLEY
PIKE
LIVINGSTON
RAPIDES
CUMBERLAND
CUMBERLAND
CUMBERLAND
FRANKLIN
LINCOLN
OXFORD
PENOBSCOT
SAGADAHOC
ANNE ARUNDEL
CALVERT
MARSHALL
MONTGOMERY
PANOLA
SCOTT
TISHOMINGO
TISHOMINGO
WARREN
WARREN
WASHINGTON
CARTER
CLAY
CLAY
COLE
COOPER
DAVIESS
DAVIESS
DAVIESS
DAVIESS
DUNKLIN
DUNKLIN
JASPER
LIVINGSTON
NEWTON
PULASKI
ST CHARLES
ST LOUIS
BIG HORN
GOLDEN VALLEY
JUDITH BASIN
SWEET GRASS
SWEET GRASS
YELLOWSTONE
BUFFALO
CEDAR
CHEYENNE
DAKOTA
DOUGLAS
FURNAS
HALL
HALL
LANCASTER
PHELPS
PIERCE
CLARK
ELKO
ELKO
ELKO
ELKO
MINERAL
WASHOE
New HampshirMERRIMACK
New Jersey
BURLINGTON
New Jersey
GLOUCESTER
New Jersey
GLOUCESTER
New Jersey
HUNTERDON
New Jersey
MERCER
New Jersey
PASSAIC
New Mexico CHAVES
New Mexico CIBOLA
New Mexico CIBOLA
New Mexico LEA
New Mexico LEA
New Mexico LINCOLN
New Mexico QUAY
New Mexico SAN JUAN
New Mexico SANTA FE
New Mexico SOCORRO
New York
ALLEGANY
New York
ONEIDA
New York
ONONDAGA
New York
OTSEGO
New York
ST LAWRENCE
North Carolina BUNCOMBE
North Carolina BUNCOMBE
North Carolina CHATHAM
North Carolina CHATHAM
North Carolina CLEVELAND
North Carolina COLUMBUS
North Carolina DAVIDSON
North Carolina DURHAM
North Carolina DURHAM
North Carolina FORSYTH
North Carolina GRANVILLE
North Carolina GUILFORD
North Carolina JACKSON
North Carolina JACKSON
North Carolina MACON
North Carolina MECKLENBURG
North Carolina MITCHELL
North Carolina NASH
North Carolina ROCKINGHAM
North Carolina STANLY
North Carolina SURRY
North Carolina WAKE
North Dakota CASS
North Dakota GRAND FORKS
North Dakota NELSON
North Dakota PIERCE
Ohio
BELMONT
Ohio
BROWN
CLINTON
FRANKLIN
GREENE
LORAIN
MAHONING
WOOD
BLAINE
COMANCHE
GRADY
GRADY
JACKSON
KAY
LE FLORE
MAJOR
MAJOR
MAYES
MAYES
OKLAHOMA
PITTSBURG
PONTOTOC
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
LANE
LANE
LINN
LINN
LINN
UMATILLA
UNION
UNION
WASCO
WASHINGTON
BEAVER
BEDFORD
BEDFORD
BERKS
BERKS
CAMBRIA
CENTRE
CLEARFIELD
CUMBERLAND
DELAWARE
ELK
JEFFERSON
LYCOMING
LYCOMING
MONTGOMERY
MONTGOMERY
Pennsylvania NORTHUMBERLAND
Pennsylvania SOMERSET
Pennsylvania TIOGA
Pennsylvania YORK
Rhode Island PROVIDENCE
South CarolinaCHARLESTON
South CarolinaDARLINGTON
South CarolinaFAIRFIELD
South CarolinaFLORENCE
South CarolinaGREENWOOD
South CarolinaLEXINGTON
South CarolinaOCONEE
South CarolinaRICHLAND
South CarolinaSPARTANBURG
South Dakota CODINGTON
South Dakota JACKSON
South Dakota JERAULD
South Dakota KINGSBURY
South Dakota LAWRENCE
South Dakota LAWRENCE
South Dakota MEADE
South Dakota MEADE
South Dakota MINNEHAHA
South Dakota PENNINGTON
South Dakota PERKINS
South Dakota ROBERTS
South Dakota YANKTON
Tennessee
ANDERSON
Tennessee
CANNON
Tennessee
CANNON
Tennessee
DE KALB
Tennessee
DYER
Tennessee
GIBSON
Tennessee
HAWKINS
Tennessee
MAURY
Tennessee
MC MINN
Tennessee
MC MINN
Tennessee
PUTNAM
Tennessee
RUTHERFORD
Tennessee
UNION
Texas
ANGELINA
Texas
ANGELINA
Texas
ATASCOSA
Texas
BELL
Texas
BEXAR
Texas
BEXAR
Texas
BRAZORIA
Texas
BURLESON
Texas
CAMERON
Texas
CARSON
CARSON
CARSON
CHAMBERS
CHAMBERS
CHEROKEE
COLORADO
COLORADO
COOKE
DALLAS
DALLAS
DEAF SMITH
DUVAL
EL PASO
ELLIS
ELLIS
FORT BEND
GALVESTON
GARZA
GONZALES
GRAY
GRIMES
GUADALUPE
HALE
HALL
HARRIS
HOPKINS
JASPER
JEFFERSON
JEFFERSON
KENEDY
LAMAR
LIBERTY
LIVE OAK
MEDINA
MEDINA
MIDLAND
MILLS
MONTAGUE
NACOGDOCHES
NAVARRO
NUECES
OCHILTREE
OLDHAM
PARMER
PARMER
POLK
RANDALL
REFUGIO
RUSK
RUSK
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Utah
Vermont
Vermont
Vermont
Vermont
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Virginia
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
RUSK
SHERMAN
SMITH
TARRANT
TARRANT
TARRANT
TARRANT
TARRANT
TARRANT
TERRY
TRAVIS
VAN ZANDT
WALKER
WHEELER
WILBARGER
WISE
WOOD
BOX ELDER
CARBON
DAVIS
GARFIELD
IRON
JUAB
SALT LAKE
SAN JUAN
SANPETE
SEVIER
SEVIER
SEVIER
ADDISON
CHITTENDEN
CHITTENDEN
GRAND ISLE
CARROLL
CHESAPEAKE CITY
FAUQUIER
FLOYD
HENRICO
HENRICO
NORFOLK CITY
PITTSYLVANIA
PRINCE GEORGE
RUSSELL
WISE
YORK
ADAMS
BENTON
BENTON
CHELAN
CLARK
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
Washington
West Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
Wyoming
CLARK
COLUMBIA
FRANKLIN
KING
KING
OKANOGAN
SNOHOMISH
SPOKANE
SPOKANE
WHATCOM
WHITMAN
WHITMAN
YAKIMA
BOONE
FAYETTE
HARRISON
KANAWHA
KANAWHA
BARRON
DANE
IOWA
IOWA
IOWA
MARQUETTE
PIERCE
SAWYER
SHEBOYGAN
SHEBOYGAN
SHEBOYGAN
WALWORTH
WAUSHARA
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
FREMONT
HOT SPRINGS
LARAMIE
LINCOLN
NATRONA
NATRONA
PARK
SHERIDAN
SWEETWATER
SWEETWATER
SWEETWATER
TETON