America Betrayed Allen Dulles 2003

Published on May 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 26 | Comments: 0 | Views: 220
of 164
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

AMERICA BETRAYED
...BUSH, BIN LADEN, 9-11...
...AIDs, ANTHRAX, IRAQ...
R. Joseph, Ph.D.

1

America Betrayed

AMERICA BETRAYED
...BUSH, BIN LADEN, 9-11...
...AIDs, ANTHRAX, IRAQ...

Copyright ©2003 R. Joseph
All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this
book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including
photocopying, or utilized in any information storage and retrieval
system without permission of the copyright owner.

Joseph, R.
America Betrayed, R. Joseph — 1st ed.
Includes Extensive Footnotes & References
ISBN 0971644578

1. Terrorism 2. 9-11 3. Osama bin Laden 4. George Bush
5. Hitler 6. Nazi 7. Saudi Arabia 8. Taliban 9. Iraq

University Press
UniversityPressCalifornia.com
San Jose, California

2

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

-4-

CIA-NAZIS: TERROR & MURDER
INCORPORATED
Corporate Terrorism, Guatemala, Chile,
Cuba, Watergate and the
KennedyAssassination
Throughout the 1930’s and early 1940s, Prescott Bush, the
Harrimans, Rockefellers, and their associates, had been in business with Nazis and the terrorist brotherhood, the SS (1,2). With
the assistance of the Dulles brothers, who were playing pivotal
roles in and out of the White House, the Brotherhood of Death
began expanding its cancerous tentacles into the heart of the United
States government (1,2). With the help of friends in high places,
including Dulles and hundreds of Nazis in the new CIA, Bush and
friends were not only able to completely cover up their treacherous
crimes, but would use the government of the United States as a
tool for committing new ones.
Within just a few years after the end of World War II, Hitler’s
SS, would be transformed into an American version of the Gestapo: the CIA. Like Hitler’s Gestapo, the CIA would be used as an
instrument for murder and terror, and the assassination of men who
threatened the political, business, and financial interests of Dulles,
Bush, and the Wall Street elite.
THE NAZIFICATION OF THE CIA & REPUBLICAN
PARTY
“After the Nazis’ 1943 defeat at Stalingrad,” write Loftus
and Aarons (1), “various Nazi businessmen realized they were on
the losing side and made plans to evacuate their wealth. The Peron
government in Argentina was receiving the Nazi flight capital with
open arms, and Dulles helped it hide the money.”
“The Guinness Book of Records lists the missing Reichsbank
treasure” estimated at $2.5 billion dollars “as the greatest unsolved
101

America Betrayed

bank robbery in history. Where did it go?”
“According to our source,” write Loftus and Aarons (1), the
bulk of the treasure was simply shipped a very short distance across
Austria and through the Brenner Pass into Italy. Dulles’ contacts
were waiting.”
“Our sources claim that Dulles and his colleagues exerted a
great deal of influence to ensure that Western investments in Nazi
Germany were not seized by the Allies as reparations for the Jews.
After all, much of ‘Hitler’s Gold’ had originally belonged to the
bankers in London and New York. The captured Nazi loot went
underground.”
At the end of WWII, some of that money, with the direct
assistance of Dulles, may have been laundered through BushHarriman-Rockefeller banks. Dulles was in an excellent position
to help his friends and cover up his tracks, because with Roosevelt
dead, any effective opposition to him had also died. Dulles and his
brother began consolidating their forces in the new Truman administration, volunteering their services, spreading their tentacles,
covering up their crimes, and buying power (3).
Loftus and Aarons (1) go on to say, “Dulles and some of his
friends volunteered for postwar service with the government not
out of patriotism but of necessity. They had to be in positions of
power to suppress the evidence of their own dealings with the Nazis.” Through the influence of the Dulles brothers, investigations
into their traitorous acts, and those of the Harriman-BushRockefeller clique, were quashed. Ongoing investigations were also
taken away “from the Treasury and turned over to the State Department. There Dulles’ friends shredded the index to the interlocking corporations and blocked further investigations” (1).
“Dulles had this goal in mind: Not a single American businessman was ever going to be convicted of treason for helping the
Nazis. None ever was, despite the evidence. According to one of
our sources in the intelligence community, the U.S. Army Counter
Intelligence Corps (CIC) had two large ‘Civilian Internment Centers’ in Occupied Germany, code named ‘Ashcan’ and ‘Dustbin.’
The CIC had identified and captured a large number of U.S. citizens who had stayed in Germany and aided the Third Reich all
through World War II. The evidence of their treason was overwhelm102

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

ing. The captured German records were horribly incriminating.”
So, they were destroyed.
With the destruction of these and other records, Bush,
Harriman, Rockefeller, as well as the Dulles brothers were almost
in the clear. “Almost” would not be good enough. The cover up
continued.
“Justice Department attorney, O. John Rogge, dared to make
a speech about Nazi collaborators in the United States.” He “was
quickly fired. However, the attorney who buried the treason cases
was later promoted to special assistant attorney general” (1).
A number of Americans who had been in business with or
agents of Bush, Dulles, Harriman, Rockefeller, and the Nazis, were
unable to cover their tracks, and had been imprisoned at the conclusion of the war, even though they were American citizens. It
was important that they be cleared and never brought to justice,
otherwise they would likely testify against Bush and gang.
“Victor Wohreheide, the young Justice Department attorney
responsible for preparing the treason trials, suddenly ordered the
prisoners’ release. All of the Nazi collaborators were allowed to
return to the United States and reclaim their citizenship” and their
money (1). Once released, and with charges dropped, there would
be little threat of these Nazi criminals ever testifying against Bush,
Dulles, Harriman, Rockefeller, and the others.
It was not just Nazi businessmen, but Nazi businesses that
were spared.
“Despite direct orders from President Truman and General
Eisenhower, IG Farben, the citadel of the Nazi industrialists, was
never dismantled” (1). Instead, companies such as Bayer, which
comprised a major part of the IG Farben cartel, were allowed to
continue doing business, with Bush, Harriman, Dulles, and
Rockefeller getting a piece of the action.
Even worse, just as the U.S. congress had decided to give
away oil pipelines, refineries, and petroleum-related industries and
properties to the Rockefeller led oil-cartels, and to use American
tax dollars to fund new refineries and pipelines in the Middle East
(see chapter 3), “Dulles’ clients demanded, and received, Allied
compensation for bomb damage to their factories in Germany” (1).
“Only a few of the top Nazis were executed. Most of the rest
103

America Betrayed

were released from prison within a few years. Others would go
virtually unpunished. No one ever investigated the Nazi sympathizers in Western intelligence who had made it all possible.”
“The bottom line is that the Nazi businessmen survived the
war with their fortunes intact and rebuilt their industrial empires to
become the richest men in the world.” Indeed, some became
“multibillionaires” even though they “had been prominent members of Hitler’s inner circle” (1,2).
Dulles’ clients got away with it. President Roosevelt’s dream
of putting the Nazis’ moneymen on trial died with him” (1,2).
Dulles and his clients had won.
However, insofar as the Dulles-Bush-Harriman-Rockefeller
clique were concerned, this was just a single battle. The great prize
would be to seize power in the United States and to use the government to serve their own ends. Like Hitler, they intended to do it
“legally.”
Knowledge is power. Secrecy insures that knowledge and
power are controlled by those controlling the secrets. If crimes remain secret, there is no punishment, just rewards.
Espionage and spying are a means of gaining access to the
secrets of others. Knowledge is power.
It was the job of Allen Dulles to bury the secrets which would
implicate his patrons and business partners, as well as himself, in
treasonable and criminal acts. However, Dulles, with a long history in spying and espionage, wanted more than to just bury secrets. Dulles wanted to build a spy agency (4), that like Himmler’s
Gestapo, would be above the law, and thus beyond any possibility
of penalty for crimes such as terror, theft, slavery or murder.
Even before the end of World War II, Dulles, who would
soon become the first director of the CIA, had begun recruiting his
dream team of super-spymasters from the “Brotherhood of Death,”
that is, from Himmler’s dreaded SS, the Gestapo (5). Dulles would
create an American version of the Gestapo: the CIA. The CIA would
become his personal instrument of power.

DULLES’ NAZIS
From 1927 to 1941, the Dulles brothers worked as lawyers
and international finance specialists for Sullivan & Cromwell, a
104

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Wall Street law firm in New York. Allen Dulles performed work
for Bush, Harriman, and Rockefeller in setting up business relationships with the Nazis and with top Nazi industrialists. Dulles
played a pivotal role in promoting U.S.-Nazi corporate relations
(6).
Dulles was also legal counsel for Standard Oil and the Nazi’s
IG Farben, which had partnered with the Rockefellers and owned
considerable Standard oil stock. His brother John Dulles (who
later became Secretary of State) was an IG Farben board member
(6).
Dulles was originally recruited by OSS intelligence chief
Colonel William J. Donovan, in 1941, and was posted to Berne,
Switzerland. Dulles was picked because of his great expertise on
Germany which he acquired through his law firm and by working
as an agent for Bush, Harriman, and Rockefeller (6).
From October 1942 to May 1945, he gathered intelligence
information on Nazi Germany, especially as it pertained to commerce and industry. Much of this information was also passed on
to his business associates, i.e. Bush and gang (1,2,6).
The Nazis considered Dulles to be “the most influential White
House man in Europe” and Dulles had numerous meetings with
top ranking members of the SS (4,6,7). In January of 1943, Dulles,
acting as a representative of the United States, began negotiating
with top Nazis. Dulles was urging that Hitler be deposed and replaced by SS chief Himmler (7).
Himmler was a mass murderer, responsible for the deaths of
at least ten million men, women, and children, in the Nazi death
camps and elsewhere (7,8). However, Himmler was still a business
man and a member of the “Brotherhood of Death” (8), as were
Bush, Harriman, Rockefeller, and other Dulles’ associates (9).
Dulles and gang thought Himmler would make a fine leader.
All were in agreement with the Dulles plan, including
Himmler, and presumably, the White House (7). “The stumbling
block was the question of how the SS could get rid of Hitler” (7).
Himmler wished to make Hitler an “honorary president.”
The entire plan of replacing Hitler, however, went awry, when,
according to Dulles (4), Hitler became aware of the plan due to
“some Allied agency neither American or British.”
105

America Betrayed

Himmler panicked.
Dulles then began negotiating with Obergruppenfuhrer Karl
Wolff (4), Himmler’s “senior aid” and the “Head of his Personal
Staff.” Wolff “knew all the murkiest secrets of SS headquarters.”
This too came to naught, perhaps because Hitler learned of
the meetings with Dulles. Curiously, Hitler seemed to know Dulles
personally, and thus did not object to these meetings. In April, 1945,
for example, Hitler summoned Wolff and asked him about Dulles
(7,8). Wolf replied: “I am happy to report to you, my Fuhrer, that
I have succeeded in opening doors through Mr. Dulles.” After further discussion, Hitler relied: “Go back to Italy. Keep up your relationship with Dulles and the Americans.”
By this late stage of the game, it was clear that Germany had
lost the War. It was also clear that it would be impossible to install
Himmler as the leader of Germany, though, that hope was actually
kept alive until the final weeks of the war.
Dulles and the Bush gang had lots of Nazi “friends” including hundreds of men who wore the dreaded SS death head. Many
of these were Nazi businessmen—men who, in the name of profits, enslaved, starved, and worked to death, millions of men and
women.
When the war ended, Dulles acted to insure that Nazi businessmen would escape punishment with their fortunes intact. He
also helped thousands of high ranking SS officers to escape.
Dulles was not acting out of kindness. He wanted to put these
men to work as spies who would murder and kill in the name of the
good ‘ol USA. Even before the war ended, Dulles had begun recruiting Gestapo agents, that is, members of the German Order of
Skull and Bones, the Brotherhood of Death, into what would become the American version of the Gestapo, the CIA (5,6).
As recently revealed by the CIA (5) and as documented by
Christopher Simpson, in his extensively researched book, Blowback
(10), “hundreds of convicted Nazi war criminals” were “smuggled
out of Germany to avoid prosecution at the war crimes trials at
Nuremberg.” They were “recruited by, and were put on the payroll
of several U.S. government agencies, including the Army CIC, the
OSS, and the Office of Policy Coordination within the State Department.”
106

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Dulles was well rewarded for his work on behalf of his Nazi
friends and American business partners. He became the first director of the CIA.
Once the war ended, thousands of SS men, murderers, torturers, killers of women, children and babies, were recruited by
Dulles, including, as admitted by the CIA on April 29, 2001 (11),
Klaus Barbie, the infamous “Butcher of Lyon.” Barbie was eventually convicted of crimes against humanity by a French court.
SS Nazi Major General Walter Dornberger was yet another
“butcher” recruited by Dulles. Dornberger had been sentenced to
death by hanging for war crimes. With the help of Dulles he escaped his fate, and was welcomed with open arms into what would
become the CIA (5).
As revealed by the National Archives, as admitted by the CIA,
and as reported by BBC and UPI (5), the CIA employed high ranking Nazis, including Nazi General Reinhard Gehlen who placed
his Nazi spy ring at the disposal of Dulles following the close of
WWII. Gehlen’s Nazi CIA spy ring, became known as “the Gehlen
Organization and received millions of dollars in funding from the
U.S. until 1956” (11).
Gehlen was Hitler’s senior intelligence officer on the Eastern Front during the war and was responsible for the torture and
murder of millions of Soviet prisoners of war. However, instead of
being brought to justice, Gehlen’s network of SS and Gestapo Nazi
agents, were secretly released from prisoner of war camps by U.S.
intelligence officers at the urgings of Allen Dulles.
According to T. H. Tetens author of “The New Germany and
the Old Nazis, “Gehlen “immediately asked for an interview with
the commanding officer “ and offered the United States “his intelligence staff, spy apparatus, and the priceless files for future service.”
Dulles made personal arrangements for Gehlen to be sent to
Washington where his offer was accepted. “The Pentagon-Gehlen
agreement,” states Tetens (12), “in practice guaranteed the continuation of the all-important Abwehr division of the German General Staff. Hundreds of German army and SS officers were quietly
released from internment camps and joined Gehlen’s headquarters
in the Spessart Mountains in central Germany. When the staff had
107

America Betrayed

grown to three thousand men, the Bureau Gehlen opened a closely
guarded twenty-five-acre compound near Pullach, south of Munich,
operating under the innocent name of the South German Industrial
Development Organization.”
“In the early fifties it was estimated that the organization
employed up to 4,000 intelligence specialists in Germany, mainly
former army and SS officers, and more than 4,000 V-men (undercover agents). Gehlen’s spy network stretched from Korea to Cairo,
from Siberia to Santiago de Chile. Within a few years the Gehlen
apparatus had grown by leaps and bounds” (12).
As summed up by Tetens (12), “the short period of 1950-51
must be marked as the time when Hitler’s old officers, SS leaders,
and [Nazi] party functionaries returned to power and influence.”
A US Justice Department spokesman, Eli Rosenbaum, said
“the files demonstrated that the real winners of the war were Nazi
war criminals.”
Allen Dulles, in his book “The Secret Surrender,” justifies
his use of Gestapo agents, by making a distinction between “good”
and “bad” Nazis. Standartenfuehrer Eugen Dollmann, Himmler’s
representative in Rome, was a “good” Nazi, as was SS
Obergruppenfuehrer Karl Wolff.
In November, 1938, this “good” Nazi, Karl Wolff played a
major role in the atrocities of “Kristallnacht” (the night of broken
glass), during which 20,000 German Jews were attacked, beaten
up, their homes and business burnt, and then sent to concentration
camps where they were tortured, starved, and murdered.
After the conquest of Poland, Wolf sent a letter to Himmler
which read as follows: “For your letter of July 28th, 1942, I thank
you—also in the name of the Reichsfuehrer SS—sincerely. With
particular joy I noted your assurance that for two weeks now a
train has been carrying, every day, 5000 members of the Chosen
People to Treblinka, so that we are now in a position to carry through
this ‘population movement.’ With best regards and Heil Hitler!”
Thus, in the mind of Dulles and his CIA, there are “good”
sadists and mass murderers such as Wolff and even SS chief,
Himmler, and those that are bad sadists and murderers, i.e. communists and labor leaders.
The CIA, thus, became a Nazi refuge and would soon be108

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

come an instrument of Nazi-like terror. The CIA, like the Gestapo,
would employ espionage, propaganda, terror, chemical and biological warfare, including the purposeful infection and murder of
innocent American and foreign citizens, to obtain its objectives
(13, see also chapter 8). And, like the Gestapo, the CIA would be,
as it still is, above the law, and its agents would be encouraged to
break the law and to commit crimes against humanity.
“Hitherto acceptable norms of human conduct do not apply.
If the United States is to survive, long-standing American concepts
of ‘fair play’ must be reconsidered. We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert,
sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated, and more effective methods than those used against us. It
may become necessary that the American people be made acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.” —General James Doolittle, report to President
Eisenhower, 1954.
“The CS is the only part of the IC [intelligence community],
indeed of the government, where hundreds of employees on a daily
basis are directed to break extremely serious laws in countries
around the world. A safe estimate is that several hundred times
every day (easily 100,000 times a year) DO officers engage in highly
illegal activities that not only risk political embarrassment to the
US but also endanger the freedom if not lives of the participating
foreign nationals and, more than occasionally, of the clandestine
officer himself.” —Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,
House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1996.
“Over the past fifty years, it is now documented, these Americanized fugitive Nazi war criminals have been involved in, and in
many cases in charge of U.S. government covert operations — international weapons smuggling, drug cartels, Central American
death squads, right wing anti-communist dictatorships, LSD mind
control experiments — the Republican National Committee’s Ethnic Heritage Councils, and the Presidential campaigns of Richard
Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George Bush” (12).
Hitler’s dream and his SS essentially became the CIA.
Indeed, the Dulles, Bush, Harriman, Rockefeller clique, like
Hitler before them, would employ Nazi-CIA terrorists not just for
109

America Betrayed

spying and murder, but as instruments to be used for gaining incredible wealth, as well as political power, and as yet another
means of gaining control over the United States government.
THE BIRTH OF THE CIA
The CIA was the afterbirth of a marriage between Hitler’s
SS, and the OSS (6,10,12). In 1944, William J. Donovan, the creator of the OSS, and his assistant, Allen Dulles, presented a draft
proposal for the creation of a super-spy agency, “which will procure intelligence both by overt and covert methods and will at the
same time provide intelligence guidance, determine national intelligence objectives, and correlate the intelligence material collected
by all government agencies.”
Three years later, in 1947, President Harry S. Truman, agreed
to the formation of a centralized intelligence agency, with Dulles
acting as a director (14). In 1949, the Central Intelligence Agency
Act (15) was passed, thus creating a spy agency which would be
modeled after the SS, and which would be above the law, and could
carry out its activities in secret and independent of congressional
scrutiny. The act also exempted the CIA from having to disclose its
“organization, functions, officials, titles, salaries, or numbers of
personnel employed.”
Dulles immediately began recruiting Nazi terrorists and SS
torturers to fill the ranks, and to teach SS methods to new CIA
recruits (6,10,12). Almost overnight, the CIA became a criminal
enterprise, devoted to protecting the business interests of the Wall
Street elite, including those directed or controlled by Bush,
Harriman, Rockefeller, and the Dulles brothers. Anyone and everyone challenging or threatening the ability of these men and their
associates to make money and to rape and exploit third world countries, became dangers to “national security.” Opponents would be
eliminated, their governments or organizations toppled, and indigenous populations, including workers, murdered or terrorized into
submission—tactics identical to those employed by Hitler’s SS—
the Brotherhood of Death (7).
THE SECRET WARS OF THE CIA
“”I worked in the CIA for 13 years” explained John Stockwell,
110

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

in a speech given on October 10, 1987. In 1978, Stockwell, the
highest-ranking CIA official ever to leave the agency and go public, was awarded the Medal of Merit before he resigned.
“I sat on a subcommittee of the NSC [National Security Council] so I was like a chief of staff, with the GS-18s, Henry Kissinger,
Bill Colby (the CIA director), making the important decisions. My
job was to put it all together and make it happen and run it” (16).
“I was conditioned by my training, my marine corps training, and my background, to believe in everything they were saying
about the cold war, and I took the job with great enthusiasm....
only to discover...that nothing we were doing in fact defended U.S.
national security interests.”
“The CIA, the state department, works with the death squads.
They don’t meet the death squads on the streets where they’re actually chopping up people or laying them down on the street and
running trucks over their heads. The CIA people meet the police
chiefs, and the people who run the death squads, and they do liaise
with them, they meet them beside the swimming pool of the villas.
And it’s a sophisticated, civilized kind of relationship. And they
talk about their children, who are going to school at UCLA or
Harvard. They don’t talk about the horrors of what’s being done.”
“I went to Nicaragua a total of 7 times. This was a major
covert action. It gave me a chance, after running operations from
Washington, to go to a country that was under attack, to talk to the
leadership, to talk to the people, to look and see what happens when
you give white phosphorous or grenades or bombs to people, and
they go inside a country... It gave me a chance to talk to the people,
who have been shot, or hit, or blown up.... We’re talking about 10
to 20 thousand covert actions.”
“The Indonesian covert action of 1965, not only eliminated
the Indonesian communist party, it also eliminated the entire segment of the population that tended to support the communist party
- the ethnic Chinese, Indonesian Chinese. The CIA’s report put the
number of dead at 800,000 killed. Ralph McGehee,” who helped
run that operation, “said that this was a model operation that should
be copied everywhere in the world.”
“That’s the sentiment in Washington. If you’re killing 1 to 3
million communists, that’s great. The problem, though, is that these
111

America Betrayed

people killed by our national security activities are not communists. They’re not Communists, they’re not Communist KGB. In
the field we used to play chess with the KGB officers, and have
drinks with them. It was like professional football players - we
would knock heads on Sunday, maybe in an operation, and then
Tuesday you’re at a banquet together drinking toasts and talking.
The people that are dying are people of the third world. That’s the
common denominator. People that have the misfortune of being
born in the Metumba mountains of the Congo, in the jungles of
Southeast Asia, in the hills of Nicaragua. Far more Catholics than
communists, far more Buddhists than communists. Most of them
couldn’t give you an intelligent definition of communism, or of
capitalism.”
“The CIA creates police units that become death squads with
the leaders on the CIA’s payroll, trained by the CIA. We had the
‘public safety program’ going throughout Central and Latin America
for 26 years, in which we taught them to break up subversion by
interrogating people. Interrogation, including torture. Dan Metrione,
the famous exponent of these things, was the master of the business, how to apply the right amount of pain, at just the right times,
in order to get the response you want from the individual. They
developed a wire. They gave them crank generators, with ‘U.S.
AID’ written on the side, so the victims would know where these
things came from.”
“Now how do you teach torture? Dan Metrione: ‘I can teach
you about torture, but sooner or later you’ll have to get involved.
You’ll have to lay on your hands and try it yourselves.’”
“To teach torture, sometimes they would grab beggars from
off the streets. All they could do was lie there and scream. And
when they would collapse, they would bring in doctors and shoot
them up with vitamin B and rest them up for the next class. And
when they would die, they would mutilate the bodies and throw
them out on the streets, to terrify the population so they would be
afraid of the police and the government. And this is what the CIA
was teaching them to do.”
“To destabilize Nicaragua, beginning in 1981, we began
funding Somoza’s ex-national guardsmen, calling them the contras
(the counter-revolutionaries). We created this force, it did not exist
112

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

until we allocated money. We’ve-7armed them, put uniforms on their
backs, boots on their feet, given them camps in Honduras to live
in, medical supplies, doctors, training, leadership, and then sent
them in to de-stabilize Nicaragua. Under our direction they systematically blew up granaries, saw mills, bridges, government offices, schools, health centers. They ambushed trucks so the produce couldn’t get to market. They raided farms and villages... they
assassinated religious workers, teachers, health workers, elected
officials, government administrators. They use terror, a technique
to traumatize the society so that it can’t function.
“They’d go into villages, haul out families, and with the children forced to watch they’d castrate the father, peel the skin off his
face, put a grenade in his mouth and pull the pin. With the children
forced to watch they’d gang-rape the mother, and slash her breasts
off. And sometimes for variety, they make the parents watch while
they do these things to the children. Its been documented that 13,000
people were killed this way in Nicaragua, mostly women and children. These are the activities done by these contras. The contras
are the people Reagan and Bush call ‘freedom fighters’” (16).
THE NAZI-REPUBLICAN WING OF THE PARTY
Like Hitler’s Gestapo (7,8), the mission of the CIA had a
definite political purpose which was to put into power those sympathetic to the interests of the Wall Street elite and who supported
the fascist ideology of the Brotherhood. However, it was not just
third world countries which would be subverted, but the government of the United States.
As explained by Loftus and Aarons (1) “Dulles had been recruiting Nazis under the cover of the State Department’s Office of
Policy Coordination. Eastern European émigré networks that had
worked first for the SS, then the British, and finally Dulles” were
also recruited and put on the payroll of the State Dept., even though
they were Nazis working for the CIA.
“The CIA did not know it, but Dulles was bringing them to
the United States less for intelligence purposes than for political
advantage. The Nazis’ job quickly became to get out the vote for
the Republicans.”
“According to several of our sources among the ‘old spies,’
113

America Betrayed

Richard Nixon’s political career began in 1945, when he was the
navy officer temporarily assigned to review . . . captured Nazi documents” (1). The documents revealed the Nazi record of Karl Blessing, “former Reichsbank officer and then head of the Nazi oil cartel, Kontinentale Ol A.G. ‘Konti’ was in partnership with Dulles’
principal Nazi client, IG Farben. Dulles” with Nixon’s help “lost
Blessings Nazi party records and personally vouched for Blessing
as an anti-Nazi in order to protect continued control of German oil
interests in the Middle East. Blessing’s Konti was the Nazi link to
Ibn Saud [King of Saudi Arabia] and ARAMCO [the ArabianAmerican Oil Company]. If Blessing went down, he could have
taken a lot of people with him, including Allen Dulles,” and the
Bush, Harriman, Rockefeller gang.
Naturally, the Dulles, Bush, Harriman, Rockefeller clique
were eager to reward Nixon for his help, and together, they “arranged financing for Nixon’s first congressional campaign. Nixon,
they believed, would be yet another useful tool in the toolbox they
were constructing in Congress. Some of these tools, i.e. Thomas
Dewey, they hoped to place in the White House. Nixon won, but
Dewey lost the election.
Not surprisingly, Richard Nixon gives a different explanation as to how his relationship with the Bush gang first developed.
In his biography (17), Nixon claims that he saw an advertisement,
in a Los Angeles newspaper, that had been placed there, in 1946,
by the Orange County Republican Party and a wealthy group of
businessmen led by Prescott Bush. Bush and friends, Nixon claims,
wanted a young candidate to run for Congress against the liberal
democratic incumbent. Nixon says he responded to the ad, and
they basically hired him to run for congress, which he did, thus
becoming a congressional mouthpiece for the Bush gang.
Nixon, acting as the pro-business, anti-communist mouthpiece of the Dulles-Bush-Harriman-Rockefeller clan, was so effective in this capacity, that he became Eisenhower’s running mate,
in 1952—despite Eisenhower’s dislike of the man.
“In preparation for the 1952 Eisenhower-Nixon campaign,
the Republicans formed an Ethnic Division, which, to put it bluntly,
recruited the ‘displaced Fascists’ who arrived in the United States
after World War II. Like similar migrant organizations in several
114

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Western countries, the Ethnic Division attracted a significant number of Central and Eastern European Nazis, who had been recruited
by the SS as political and police leaders during the Holocaust” (1).
The Nazis worked not only for the Eisenhower-Nixon ticket,
but to put Prescott Bush in the Senate. It was during this same time
period, during the early days of the attempted Nazification of the
Republican party, that Prescott’s son, George H. W. Bush, became
actively involved with Republican politics. It was possibly also
around this same period, that G.H.W. Bush began working in the
CIA.
It was the dream of Dulles and gang, to elevate their man
Nixon, to the White House. In 1960, Nixon ran against Kennedy.
Although the Nazi wing of the party was put at Nixon’s disposal,
he lost. Nixon didn’t blame his loss on the Nazis. Far from it. Instead, and at the urgings of Dulles and gang, he intended to make
full use of his Nazi friends the next time he ran for president.
“In 1968 Nixon promised that if he won the presidential election, he would create a permanent ethnic council within the Republican party” (1). The word “ethnic” was code for “Nazi.” In
the early 1960s, if not before, George H.W. Bush also began playing an active role in the creation of these ethnic councils. Thus he
willingly carried out Nixon’s promise after the 1972 election, while
he served as chairman of the Republican National Committee (1,19).
One of the men Bush helped to recruit was Laszlo Pasztor,
who became the Chairman of Nixon’s Republican Heritage Groups
council. During World War II Pasztor served as a government official representing Nazi Hungary in Germany. Other émigré slots
were also filled by the members of various Nazi collaborationist
organizations (1,12,18,19).
As documented in a 1988 study by Russ Bellant of Political Research Associates, virtually all of the Fascist organizations
of World War II were welcomed into the Republican party during
the Nixon administration—and George W. Bush, as chairman of
the party, played a major role. Emanuel Jasiuk was representative
of the character of the Republican ethnic leaders that Bush and
Nixon were after. Emanuel Jasiuk, was a notorious mass murderer
who was recruited by the Nazis when they invaded what is today
called the independent nation of Belarus (which during WWII was
115

America Betrayed

part of the Soviet Union).
In addition to being Nazi fascists and haters of democracy,
what all these George H.W. Bush recruits had in common was that
they had fought against the United States, during World War II.
While George Bush did his duty bringing Nazis into positions of power in the republican party, Nixon, after he became President, was surrounding “himself with what was known as the Berlin
Wall, a long succession of advisors with Germanic names: We recall at the top of his ‘German General Staff’ as it was also known,
there was Haldeman, Erlichman, Krogh, Kliendienst, Kissinger (the
Rockefellers’ emissary) and many others” (19).
As described by Groden and Livingstone (19), “Some of these
men would watch the great Nazi propaganda films in the basement
of the White House until all hours of the night, and drink, in fact,
get drunk with their power, with blind ambition, as one of them
wrote.”
As detailed by Loftus and Aarons (1), “According to several
of our sources in the intelligence community who were in a position to know, the secret rosters of the Republican party’s Nationalities Council read like a Who’s Who of Fascist fugitives. The
Republican’s Nazi connection is the darkest secret of the Republican leadership.”
NIXON NAZIS ASSASSINATE SALVADORE ALLENDE
“An Allende victory would represent a definite psychological set-back to the US and a definite psychological advantage for
the Marxist idea.” — CIA study, 9/7/70.
Chile had long been ruled by a U.S.-backed Nazi-like military dictatorship which served as a lackey for the Wall Street elite
(20).
In 1969, during Nixon’s second year in office, a coalition of
socialists, communists, and most of the social-democratic parties
of Chile, banded together to create the “Popular Unity.”
lar Unity offered a comprehensive program that was designed to
reorganize the national economy and to provide improved health
care, education, nutrition to the people of Chile. Salvador Allende
Gossens, a physician with a distinguished record of government
service, was chosen to be the Popular Unity’s presidential candi116

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

date (21).
In a speech, Allende laid out one of his “dangerous” proposals that so aggrieved Nixon and his Nazis: “Today in Chile there
are over 600,000 children mentally retarded because they were not
adequately nourished during the first eight months of their lives,
because they did not receive the necessary proteins.” To correct
the problem, Allende announced his intention to develop a free
milk-distribution program.
Wall Street, the CIA, and it’s cadre of Nazis in the Republican party and Nixon White House, became alarmed. As detailed
in the previous chapter, it was Nazi policy under Hitler, to keep
conquered peoples, and all “subhumans” uneducated, and to prevent them from gaining access to health care.
CIA agents and U.S. dollars began streaming into the country (22,23) to fight Allende. Jorge Alessandri, the former dictator
of Chile was one of the beneficiaries of CIA help and U.S. dollars.
In the days before the election, when it became clear Allende would
win, he issued a warning: “I don’t think that [Allende] will achieve
his objective because the organized public forces and Carabineros
(military police) of Chile will not allow the criminal doctrines to
win. Moved by patriotism, they will save us at the cost of sacrificing the liberty that we all enjoy” (23). In other words, the military
will overthrow Allende and his supporters, and a blood bath will
ensue.
Allende, realizing the dangers posed by the military, promised that if elected, he would only gradually implement his educational and health care programs and would not call for any changes
in Chile’s military (21,23).
General Rene Schneider Chereau, Commander in Chief of
the Chilean Army was satisfied: “The Armed Forces cannot stop
the changes. Allende has given us his assurance that he will stay
within the Constitution and laws.” The military thus stayed neutral. Despite the CIA’s attempt to interfere with the election, Allende
won by a huge plurality.
Wall Street and the Nixon administration went into shock
(20,21,22). Nixon began referring to Allende as “that bastard...
We’re going to get that bastard...”
As summed up by one Chilean newspaper (24): “This elec117

America Betrayed

tion must have been a shock to foreign investors in Chile, mainly
for the mining companies owned by the Americans...Allende is
ready to install a revolutionary government to end the dominion of
foreign capital.”
Nixon and his Nazis knew better. They decided to kill
Allende.
“I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go
communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people.” —
Henry Kissinger, National Security Adviser to Nixon.
“Save Chile! … not concerned with risks involved …
$10,000,000 available, more if necessary.” — handwritten notes of
CIA Director Richard Helms, 9/15/1973.
“It is firm and continuing policy that Allende be overthrown
by a coup. It would be much preferable to have this transpire prior
to 24 October but efforts in this regard will continue vigorously
beyond this date. We are to continue to generate maximum pressure toward this end utilizing every appropriate resource. It is imperative that these actions be implemented clandestinely and securely so that the United States government and American hand be
well hidden. . . . Please review all your present and possibly new
activities to include propaganda, black operations, surfacing of intelligence or disinformation, personal contacts, or anything else
your imagination can conjure which will permit you to press forward toward our objective.” —Cable from CIA headquarters to
Henry Heckscher, CIA station chief in Santiago, Chile, 10/16/1973.
The CIA realized, however, that if it was to regain control of
the country, not just Allende and his supporters, but the General
Rene Schneider Chereau would also have to be removed. General
Chereau had promised to obey the constitution and to uphold democracy. A military coup would be impossible with General
Chereau at the helm.
On October 26, General Rene Schneider Chereau was dead.
He had been attacked and shot by 10 men. According to Chilean
intelligence sources, U.S. President Richard Nixon had given “orders to prevent the socialists’ rise to power, hoping to prevent the
creation of another Soviet ally in the Western Hemisphere” (25).
That is, the Nixon administration ordered the assassination of General Chereau. Allende would be next.
118

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

The CIA now had control over Chile’s military. Chilean General Pinochet, would become one of the leaders of the military coup,
and then, following the overthrow of Allende, Pinochet would become Chile’s new US-backed dictator.
On September 11, 1973, US Navy ships, which had gathered
off the coast of Chile, went on high alert offshore. Over 30 jet
fighters and support planes began to appear along the borders.
The signal was given: Sections of the Chilean navy seized
the port city of Valparaíso, west of Santiago. Allende called his
Minister of Defense, Orlando Letelier, and asked him to investigate. Letelier was immediately arrested. Allende began calling his
generals. “No one is answering,” he remarked. “I think that this
time all of them are involved.”
Soon the Presidential palace was surrounded by tanks. Jets
soared overhead. Snipers had taken up their positions.
The attack began. Tank cannons boomed. Jets fired missiles.
And then Chilean soldiers attacked and swarmed into the Palace.
A little after 12 noon, Salvador Allende was dead. He had
been shot in the head (26).
It was not enough to kill Allende. Wall Street, the CIA, and
the Nixon Nazis were determined to terrorize the Chilean population into helpless submission and to destroy his supporters root
and branch.
NIXON NAZIS TERRORIZE & MURDER THE PEOPLE
OF CHILE: 9/11-1973
The CIA had learned their art from the masters of terror:
Hitler’s SS. In order to subdue and enslave a population, it must be
subjected to unrelenting terror. The Nixon White House, the
Rockefeller-Bush Wall Street clique, and the CIA, were determined
to crush and destroy the people of Chile and to eliminate any member of the intellectual or professional class who even harbored a
socialist thought (26).
Based on lists provided by the CIA, students, teachers, doctors, nurses, and of course, members of the Popular Unity party,
were the first to be “disappeared;” i.e. rounded up, hideously tortured, and killed. Then the working class and the peasants were
targeted. Those who had dared to elect Allende would be tortured,
119

America Betrayed

murdered, and severely punished (26,27).
The following eye-witness accounts are taken from Robinson
Rojas Sandford’s book, The Murder of Allende and the End of the
Chilean Way of Socialism (26):
“During the first weeks of October, I had to cross Bulnes
bridge to get over the Mapocho very early every morning. The first
time I could not believe my eyes. It couldn’t be true. From a distance I could see lots of people gathered along the bridge’s railing
and the riverbanks. They were looking at the half-floating corpses,
four men’s bodies. I still remember, one was wearing a red shirt.
Farther off, there was a fifth body which had been dragged ashore.”
“This scene went on every day, and not just at this bridge.
You could see them at Pedro de Valdivia bridge too. Dozens of
women would station themselves at the bridges every day, in hopes
of seeing the body of a husband or son who had disappeared after
being picked up by the soldiers.”
“One day I saw nine corpses, all with bare chests, hands tied
behind their backs. The bodies were perforated by bullet holes.
And with them was the body of a girl, apparently fifteen or sixteen
years old.”
“Some peasants traveling over the Las Tejuelas bridge, which
crosses the Ñuble River about a mile and a half from Chillán, noted
that, as usual, the water level was beginning to drop with the end of
the rainy season. Along with this phenomenon, they noticed another one, new and horrifying: the appearance of dozens of headless cadavers with their arms tied behind their backs. Some of the
bodies were half decayed. When the peasants notified the military
police post at the city gates, they were told curtly: ‘You saw nothing. If you say anything, we will arrest you and cut your throats,
just like those corpses.’”
“Those bodies were the leftovers from the ‘extermination’
operation in Ñuble Province, resembling the “leftovers” in any other
province in Chile after September 11—human debris left by bayonets, machine guns, and torture devices of the Chilean Air Force,
Navy, and Army.”
“Shortly before this incident at the Las Tejuelas bridge, the
Arauco Fishing Association, which produces canned seafood in
the port of Talcahuano, had to halt work for several days. The fish
120

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

they were receiving were full of bits of human flesh from bodies
the Chilean Navy had tossed into the ocean after they came out of
the naval base’s torture chambers.”
“Chilean Air Force troops deposited the body of a seventeen-year-old boy, an MIR party member, in a town south of
Santiago. Part of the boy’s abdomen had been subjected to vivisection. Both his legs were broken, and also his left arm. His entire
body was covered with holes made by cigarette burns. He had also
been castrated. “
“Children were not spared. On September 18 a military patrol went to pick up José Soto, a maker of wrought iron furniture,
in his sixties, president of the supply and price control junta in his
district, Quinta Normal. Soto wasn’t home. His fourteen-year old
son was alone in the house. The military patrol seized the boy.
Afterward they threw the boy’s bullet-riddled body on Soto’s doorstep - ‘so the sonofabitch won’t be a faggot and will turn himself
in,’ the soldiers shouted to his neighbors.”
“Other common forms of torture practiced by the Army’s
SIM and military police intelligence officers were to extinguish
cigarettes in the victim’s anus and to apply electric current to the
ears, anus, and testicles.”
“During September and part of October, in the Santiago communities around the industrial areas, the soldiers would leave bodies in the streets. When their relatives came to pick them up, they
were arrested. The bodies generally had fingernails pulled out, or
legs broken, or testicles smashed. Several had their eyes burnt out,
apparently with cigarette butts.”
The torture and the murders continued for years. Anyone
could be a target, even citizens of other countries including the
United States and Britain (28).
William Beausire was a citizen of Britain. “He was apolitical. He had committed no crime. In November 1974, William was
on his way to England from Santiago when he was abducted in
Buenos Aires by agents of DINA, General Pinochet’s intelligence
service. He was taken to their notorious Villa Grimaldi torture centre in Santiago. Over the next seven months William was systematically tortured by the Chilean secret police. We know from witnesses that William had electrodes attached to his genitals. We know
121

America Betrayed

that he had sticks forced into his rectum. We know he was suspended from a wall, hanging by his arms. We don’t know what
happened to William. He was last seen in July 2nd 1975, being
escorted by DINA agents from a torture centre in Santiago. He is
now missing, presumed dead.”
William Beausire was just one of the thousands of those tortured and killed because of the likes of Wall Street, Nixon, the
CIA, and Rockefeller-clone, Henry Kissinger. Kissinger, who never
met a mass murderer he didn’t like—that is, so long as the murderer wasn’t a communist—was pleased as punch by the atrocities
that were committed.
“In the United States, as you know, we are sympathetic with
what you are trying to do here. I think that the previous government was headed toward Communism. We wish your government
well.” —Henry Kissinger, speaking to Chilean military dictator,
Pinochet, 6/8/76.
Prior to joining the Nixon Nazis, Kissinger had served as a
top aid to Rockefeller, and played a major role in covering up the
tracks of his boss, while in Germany immediately following the
war.
Other interesting characters that served in the Nixon White
House, included, Donald Rumsfeld who would later hire his old
buddy, Dick Cheney to be his deputy. Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney
not only served during the 9/11/1993 tragedy orchestrated by the
Nixon White House, but the 9/11/2001 tragedy that occurred during the Bush jr. presidency, Like Mr. Bush, Cheney attended Yale.
And of course there is George H.W. Bush. In 1973, he was
the chairman of the Republican party, and a member of the CIA,
during the Nixon administration. What role he played in the mass
murder and torture of Chilean men, women, and children, can only
be guessed at.
Almost 30 years after the 9/11 tragedy in Chile, Cheney and
Rumsfeld would again be part of a Republican administration during another 9/11 tragedy, this one headed by the son of George
H.W. Bush.
WATERGATE & BUSH
The Nixon Presidency ended with his resignation, after a
122

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

failed cover up of petty crimes, a burglary, committed by men associated with or employed by the CIA (29).
Nixon was not brought down by the second rate burglary
known as “Watergate,” but by the subsequent cover up and the fear
of what might also be exposed if Congress voted for impeachment.
There were numerous cover-ups in place, one of which may well
have served the purpose of covering up the role of Bush and friends
in a number of sordid and illegal plots including the financing of
the CIA-”plumbers” unit who committed the Watergate burglary
(30).
Five men had been arrested in the early morning hours of
June 17, 1972, while committing a burglary at Democratic headquarters, at the Watergate hotel. In addition to their burglary gear,
they carried nearly $3,000 in hundred dollar bills, all in sequence.
Four of the men were from Florida—Bush country. Three were
Cuban-Americans.
When burglar James W. McCord was asked his occupation
by the judge, he replied he had recently retired from government
service, from the “CIA.” He was not alone. The four men from
Miami all had CIA connections, and had been involved in “antiCastro” activities (31). James W. McCord, however, also had worked
as an FBI agent, and as the former chief of physical security for the
CIA. At the time of the burglary he was a lieutenant colonel in the
Air Force Reserve and employed full time as the security coordinator for Nixon’s Committee for the Re-election of the President.
The loyalty of McCord and the others was not to Nixon per
se, but to the Anglo-American financier elite and to the notion that
communism must be extinguished wherever it may rear its head.
Some of these individuals were directly associated with CIA bureaus which in turn have been linked to George Bush, such as the
Office of Security- Security Research Staff (30).
It was Henry Kissinger—Rockefeller’s man in the Nixon
White House— who demanded the creation of “The Plumbers.”
Kissinger insisted that something had to be done to stop leaks to
the press (29). Kissinger got his wish following the “Pentagon Papers” affair of 1971.
The Plumbers were funded through a mechanism that appears to have been set up by George Bush. Funds were provided by
123

America Betrayed

a fellow oil man and Bush business partner, Bill Liedtke, the president and CEO of Pennzoil. This was first discovered by the U.S.
House of Representatives Banking and Currency Committee,
chaired by Texas Democrat Wright Patman.
The first hint that big money might be behind the Plumbers,
was the large amount of cash found in the pockets of the Watergate
burglars. Cold, hard cash, is the most common means used by Wall
Street, CIA spooks, and organized crime, when financing murders
or other crimes.
However, this time, the Wall Street elites and big oil not only
paid cash, they used checks. $100,000 was found in the Miami
bank account of Watergate burglar Bernard Barker (31). Baker had
been a CIA operative since the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba—
which was yet another link to George H.W. Bush.
The $100,000 was traced to Texas CREEP (Committee to
ReElect the President) chairman William Liedtke, longtime business partner of George H.W. Bush.
When this discovery was made by Patman’s committee, an
all out effort was made by the Nixon White House to stop any
investigation which might lead from Liedtke to Bush and thus from
Bush to Barker and to the Bay of Pigs.... which in turn, as we shall
see, could lead to questions about the assassination of John F.
Kennedy. Indeed, CREEP had set aside hundreds of thousands of
dollars to subvert the electoral process and to eliminate any and all
democrats who might pose a threat to the election of Richard Nixon
(31).
As would be the case following the cover up of the events
leading up to the tragedy of 9/11/2001, the FBI took the lead in
mishandling the Watergate “investigation.” For example, “the government inexplicably failed to execute search warrants for the homes
of the five arrested burglars... Persons in critical positions who might
know details of the bugging operation, particularly secretaries,”
were not interviewed (31). Others were questioned with their lawyers present and then, they were not asked the right questions (31).
Likewise, “prosecutors had not persued other crimes—no matter
how obvious” (31). In addition, those being investigated, and their
associates were receiving copies of FBI reports.
Acting FBI director, Gray, later admitted that he had “con124

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

tained the investigation judiciously” to the point of criminal negligence (31). Gray even destroyed documents taken from the White
House safe of one of the Watergate burglars. Almost 30 years later,
another FBI director, Mr. Mueller, would be accused of similar
crimes in an attempt to cover up FBI, CIA, and Bush administration complicity in the 9/11/2001 attacks.
Who led the effort to sabotage the Watergate investigation?
Nixon and his henchmen. Who else? We can only guess. However,
what we do know is that the sabotage involved threatening and
blackmailing six Democratic members of the House Banking and
Currency Committee.
As later admitted by Nixon operative Maurice Stans: “There
were indirect approaches to Democratic [committee] members. An
all-out campaign was conducted to see that the investigation was
killed off, as it successfully was.”
Kentucky Democratic Congressman William Curlin, Jr., revealed in 1973 that “certain members of the committee were reminded of various past political indiscretions, or of relatives who
might suffer as a result of [a] pro-subpoena vote.”
Despite its charter, the CIA as well as the FBI regularly spies
on members of congress, the judiciary and their staffs. Evidence
of adultery, pedophilia, drug use, and so on, are stored and filed
away, to be used in cases of necessity—at which time the files may
be used to persuade a congressman or senator to vote a certain
way. And if they don’t, the information may then be leaked to the
press.
Members of Patman’s committee were apparently shown such
files, and they voted on Oct. 3, 1972, against continuing chairman
Patman’s investigation into who had funded the Plumbers.
It was also revealed, in a tape Nixon made of his White house
conversations, that Nixon had instructed Haldeman to stop an FBI
inquiry into who had provided the funds to the “plumbers” unit.
Haldeman was told to use the excuse that the investigation would
endanger CIA operations (29).
Indeed, it was a similar excuse which led to the destruction
of files taken from the White House safe of Howard Hunt. Acting
FBI director “Gray was told that the files were ‘political dynamite’
and should ‘never see the light of day’” (31). Indeed, as detailed
125

America Betrayed

by Bernstein and Woodward (31): “the covert activities” the Nixon
White House was seeking to cover up, “involve the whole U.S.
intelligence community...The cover up was mainly to protect the
covert operations. The president, himself, has been blackmailed.”
The involvement of the FBI in the coverup and other improprieties and illegalities eventually became public. In consequence,
acting FBI director, L. Patrick Gray was forced to resigned.
The exact role of the CIA in the Watergate coverup is still
not known. However, it is known that the CIA also sought to put a
halt to these investigations as so many former agents were involved.
However, the concern was not with Watergate. There were yet other,
even more serious crimes which had been covered up and which
might now come to light, including those related to an international incident known as the “Bay of Pigs” and the assassination of
President John F. Kennedy.
MURDER INCORPORATED: ASSASSINATIONS & THE
CIA
In 1951, Dulles was appointed Deputy Director of the nascent Central Intelligence Agency, and in 1953 he was appointed
CIA Director by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. In that capacity,
Allen Dulles orchestrated a number of remarkable covert intelligence operations such as the overthrow of Iranian nationalist leader
Mohammed Mossagdeh in 1953.
Upon coming to power, Prime Minister Dr. Mohammed
Mossadeq had the audacity to defy the British-led oil cartel which
was pumping Iranian oil out of the ground but paying almost no
royalties (32). In 1951 Mossadeq authorized nationalization of
the Iranian National Oil company.
The Rockefeller-led oil-brotherhood retaliated by refusing
to purchase Iranian oil, whereas crippling sanctions were imposed
by Britain and the U.S. sending Iran spiraling into financial chaos.
Rockefeller, however, had no interest in forcing the return of oil
concessions to Britain. Rather, his intention was to grab Iran’s oil
fields for himself (32). The hated “Shah” of Iran—who had been
forced from power and was eager to return—agreed to the deal.
Mossadeq, however, would have to be overthrown.
Dulles organized a campaign of terror and destabilization, in
126

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

order to overthrow Mossadeq and bring the “Shah” to power in his
place. Contrary to plan, the people of Iran rose up in rebellion and
the “Shah” was forced to flee the country.
Dulles and Rockefeller (and Rockefeller’s top aid, Kissinger)
were not about to give up. The People of Iran, would be severely
punished.
The CIA called upon the Iranian military, and a CIA-trained
security force, SAVAK, and provided $10-million dollars in funds,
as well as training, logistics, weapons, and supervision, and unleashed a brutal civil war in the country. Mossadeq was deposed,
the Shah was returned to power, and the CIA-trained special police, SAVAK terrorized the population to maintain order (32,33).
After the coup, Iranian National Oil was de-nationalized, with U.S.
oil companies getting the lion’s share, rights to 40% of all output.
Dulles and the Rockefeller oil-men on Wall Street had won.
In 1976, Amnesty International concluded that the Shah of Iran
had the worst human rights record on the planet, and that the number and variety of torture techniques the CIA had taught SAVAK
were “beyond belief.”
*******
The next major target of the Dulles clique, was Guatemalan
leader, Guilermo Arbenz.
GUATEMALA & UNITED FRUIT
Dulles and his brother, John, were linked financially to the
United Fruit Company. As detailed by Shlesinger and Kinzer (34)
“Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and his brother CIA Director Allen Dulles had a personal interest in protecting United Fruit’s
businesses. Both had investments in firms with heavy investments
in United Fruit. In addition, the American ambassador at the UN
was a stockholder of United Fruit and President Eisenhower’s personal secretary [Ann Whitman] was the wife of United Fruit’s public
relations director.” Allen Dulles also served on the board of directors, and his old law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, had represented
UFC.
The United Fruit Company (UFC) virtually owned Guatemala. UFC paid no taxes, it dictated the laws, workers were basi127

America Betrayed

cally slaves earning the lowest wages in the world. If anyone complained or tried to organize a union they were branded “communists” and dealt with harshly (34,35).
The United Fruit Company (UFC) not only owned most of
the land, but it had kept 85% of it out of production (35). The vast
majority of the people of Guatemala were not allowed to own or
till the land, and by law, were not even considered “citizens” of the
state which was ruled by a brutal, U.S. backed military dictator
Jorge Ubico (25,26). As the Dulles brothers had their poisonous
tentacles wrapped tightly around the throat of the U.S. government,
the U.S. government backed these policies 100%.
Unfortunately for the Wall Street elite, conditions in Guatemala began to change in 1944 with the overthrow of the military
dictatorship and the election of Guatemala’s first president, Juan
Arevalo who challenged UFC’s rule. The people of Guatemala were
given citizenship, schools and hospitals were built... and back in
Washington, plans to overthrow the new government were being
mapped out (34,35). There were over two dozen failed attempts to
overthrow Arevalo and crippling sanctions were passed by the U.S.
congress.
In 1950 Jacobo Arbenz became president, winning 63% of
the vote. He promised to extend the reforms of Arevalo, and to
break the grip held on the country by UFC. He also pledged to
develop government based industries to provide higher paying jobs
to the people and to make the country less dependent on imported
goods from America. When he also began expropriating unused
farmland and distributing it to the people, CIA director, Dulles,
and other officials connected to UFC and Wall Street, began a public relations campaign to paint the new leader of Guatemala as a
communist and a threat to the security of the free world. The New
York Times, and other major newspapers began echoing these
claims, warning of the dangers posed to the U.S., and the world, by
the “communist leader” of Guatemala.
Eisenhower was finally persuaded to authorize the training
of terrorists and saboteurs who were then unleashed upon Guatemala from neighboring countries (34). The CIA-led coup was also
supported by massive air strikes.
CIA operative, E. Howard Hunt (34) freely admitted in an
interview with CNN that in leading the overthrow that “what we
128

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

wanted to do was to have a terror campaign: to terrify Arbenz particularly, terrify his troops, much as the Germans terrified the population of Holland, Belgium and Poland at the onset of World War II
and just rendered everybody paralyzed.”
Arbenz was toppled on June 27, 1953, and a CIA-trained
army and police force took over the country. Repeating the pattern
employed in Iran, the CIA-backed army and police continued to
employ indiscriminate mass murder and terror to “keep order.”
Between 100,000 to 200,000 men, women, and children were tortured and murdered by CIA-trained thugs.
Dulles, and the Wall Street clique had won again. It was
almost impossible for them to lose as they now had the CIA and
the U.S. government to do their bidding. Any leader in any country who tried to throw off the Wall Street yoke, would be deemed a
“communist.” Sanctions would be imposed, and if possible, any
leader who sought to put his people first, would be overthrown and
killed. A Wall Street-friendly dictator and a Nazi-like SS police
state would be installed in their place (13).
THE BAY OF PIGS
Cuba, 90 miles off the coast of Florida, was just another police state, ruled by a fascist, Nazi-like dictator Fulgencio Batista.
Batista took his orders from mobsters and Wall Street (36,37).
Batista ruled Cuba with an iron fist, and was backed 100% by Wall
Street, organized crime, the CIA, and the United States government, who saw him as a “stabilizing force” at least insofar as Wall
and other criminal interests were concerned.
Havana was so overrun with American gangsters and Mafiosa,
that under Batista, Cuba became known as “the Latin Las Vegas.”
Indeed, under Batista, Havana became a playground for the Wall
Street elite, CIA, and U.S. government officials, as well as the offshore headquarters for gangsters such as Vito Genovese, Meyer
Lansky, Frank Costello, and Santo Trafficante.
As Batista received a hefty cut of the action, he was pleased
to keep the Cuban population suppressed, exploited, and under
control. Although rebellions periodically flared up, Batista and his
army had always been successful in ruthlessly and brutally quashing dissent (36,37).
129

America Betrayed

In 1958, Batista began to lose his grip over the country. Cuban peasants were rising up, and Castro’s rag-tag revolutionary
army were marching toward Havana (37). On New Year’s day,
1959, as the country spun out of his control, Batista, realizing that
he had also lost the support of the military, departed Cuba. A military junta took over (36). Castro continued his march and on the
8th of January he arrived in Havana and was greeted by hundreds
of thousands of Cubans.
On February 16th Castro became prime minister, then several months later resigned, when the new President of Cuba refused to enact land reform or to reduce rents and utility rates. On
July 26th, Castro again became Prime Minister. Standing beside
him was Che Guevara who summed up their plans for the future:
“We are now the hope of the unredeemed Americas. All eyes
– those of the great oppressors and those of the hopeful – are firmly
on us. In great measure the development of the popular movements
in Latin America depends on the future stance that we take, on our
capacity to resolve so many problems. And every step we take is
being observed by the ever-watchful eyes of the big creditor and
by the optimistic eyes of our brothers in Latin America... In Cuba
we are slaves to sugar cane, the umbilical cord that binds us to the
large northern market....We must diversify our agricultural production, stimulate industry...so that within a short time the infant Cuban industries can compete with the monstrous ones of the countries where capitalism has reached its highest level of
development...we shall struggle to the last drop of our rebel blood
to make this land a sovereign republic with the true attributes of a
nation that is happy, democratic, and fraternal with its brothers of
Latin America.”
Dulles and the Wall Street junta, had heard enough. Castro,
they decided, was a Communist, and his government would be
overthrown (39). A campaign of terror was unleashed, with both
sides committing atrocities (36,38,40).
That same year, 1959, Dulles’ CIA began to train Cuban exiles in a terrorist training camp in Guatemala. Dulles was planning
an invasion to overthrow Fidel Castro. Vice-President Richard
Nixon, who hoped to be elected President in Nov. 1960, was kept
informed of the plan (code named: JM/WAVE). It would be Nixon’s
130

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

job to implement the plan and take back Cuba, when, it was hoped,
he was elected President in November of 1960 (39).
Nixon lost the election to Kennedy. Nevertheless, in March
of 1961, Dulles received authorization for the operation by President Eisenhower who said, “Everyone must be prepared to swear
that he has not heard of it.” Apparently, President-elect Kennedy
was one of those who was initially kept out of the loop.
Part of the Bay of Pigs operation was also being run out of
South Florida (39,41).The Bay of Pigs operations know as “JM/
WAVE.... proliferated across [Florida] in preparation for the Bay
of Pigs invasion. A subculture of fronts, proprietaries, suppliers,
transfer agents, conduits, dummy corporations, blind drops, detective agencies, law firms, electronic firms, shopping centers, airlines, radio stations, the mob and the church and the banks: a false
and secret nervous system twitching to stimuli supplied by the cortex in Clandestine Services in Langley” (41).
Soon more and more people became aware that something
was up and that an invasion of Cuba might be imminent.
Not surprisingly, with so much activity, and so much attendant excitement, the press soon got wind of it, including the fact
that an army of Cuban exiles was being trained in Florida and Guatemala. Ten days before Kennedy was sworn in, the New York Times
announced: “U.S. Helps Train an Anti-Castro Force at Secret Guatemalan Base.” Presumably, this newspaper article was the first
detailed briefing Kennedy had yet received. Even after he was
was sworn in, he did not learn the rest of the details until the last
minute (39).
When John F. Kennedy came to office, the CIA was so powerful, that it was almost a state within a state, a power answerable
only to itself. It could do whatever it wanted, and it did, and was
able to resist even minimal supervision from the two previous administrations. Murder, terrorist attacks, the rigging of elections,
the incitement of rebellions, the instigation of coups, and plots to
kill foreign leaders, were all planned and carried out with little
input from outsiders, including two previous presidents of the
United States.
The CIA and the Wall Street Brotherhood assumed Kennedy
would also take a hands off approach, and would do what he was
131

America Betrayed

told, that he would bend to their wishes.
They were wrong.
Kennedy was concerned about international repercussions if
Cuba were attacked. Attacking another sovereign state without
provocation would be a violation of international law.
The CIA informed him that the Cuban people would rise up
and support the invaders and all Kennedy need to is supply 16
planes—which of course would reveal that America was behind
the attack. Kennedy decided against the plan and publicly repudiated any American involvement in any unprovoked military attack
on Cuba (39).
The CIA decided to go ahead with the plan.
On the morning of April 17, thirty minutes after the Cuban
exiles began their invasion, the phone at the president’s bedside
rang. Secretary of State Dean Rusk told Kennedy that the CIA
wanted to call in U.S. planes to cover the anti-Castro Cubans who
were running into unexpected difficulties. Although Kennedy had
been told that the grateful Cuban population would welcome the
invaders and overthrow Castro, instead they had risen up and were
massacring the CIA-trained “freedom fighters.”
Send in the air strikes, now, Kennedy was told. Everything
had already been arranged. All he need do is give the order and the
air strikes would begin (39).
Kennedy exploded. They had lied to him, had deceived him
from the very beginning, and now they were trying to force him to
declare war on Cuba and call in air-strikes.
He refused, and his decision left 1,500 exiles stranded on the
beaches of Cuba, in the Bay of Pigs (39). The CIA, top pentagon
officials, the Wall Street elite, and the Cuban exile community felt
betrayed. They were outraged. Kennedy, they decided, was a traitor. Kennedy was soft on communism. Kennedy deserved to die.
It was the “stab in the back” all over again (42).
CIA operative, E. Howard Hunt was still fuming about the
Bay of Pigs ten years later (43): “No event since the communization of China in 1949 has had such a profound effect on the United
States and its allies as the defeat of the US-trained Cuban invasion
brigade at the Bay of Pigs in April 1961. Out of that humiliation
grew the Berlin Wall, the missile crisis, guerrilla warfare through132

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

out Latin American and Africa, and our Dominican Republic intervention. Castro’s’ beachhead triumph opened a bottomless
Pandora’s box of difficulties that affected not only the United States,
but most of its allies in the Free World. These bloody and subversive events would not have taken place had Castro been toppled.
Instead of standing firm, our government pyramided crucially wrong
decisions and allowed Brigade 2506 to be destroyed. The Kennedy
administration yielded Castro all the excuse he needed to gain a
tighter grip on the island of Jose Marti, then moved shamefacedly
into the shadows and hoped the Cuban issue would simply melt
away.”
Kennedy, too felt betrayed. The CIA had lied to him. Deceived him. Made him look like a fool. Kennedy was so outraged
that he fired CIA director Allen Dulles, Dulles’ deputy Richard
Bissell, and deputy director Charles Cabell and numerous others.
Kennedy swore he was going to “smash the CIA into a thousand
pieces and scatter it to the winds.”
On June 28, 1961 Kennedy signed National Security Action
Memoranda 57, which (along with Memoranda 55,56) effectively
stripped responsibility for covert “paramilitary” operations from
the CIA, and put them under the control of the Defense Department and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. These memoranda sent shock
waves and stirred up outrage throughout the CIA—feelings which
reached the boiling point when rumors began to circulate that if
Kennedy won a second term, he would appoint his brother, Bobby
Kennedy to be head of the CIA.
Dulles had been deposed and now his private police force,
his creation, his personal instrument of terror, had been stripped
from his hands. Not only was Kennedy going to destroy it but he
he was going to hand the remains over to his brother.
It was Kennedy who would have to be destroyed.
Over the next two years, after he refused to engage in a nuclear
war with the Soviet Union over the Cuban missile crisis (44), and
when he continued to refused to expand the war in Viet Nam (45),
the desire to eliminate Kennedy reached fever pitch. Indeed, his
refusal to invade Vietnam may have been the last straw. Not only
were the “communists” threatening to take over the free world,
with each free state falling like dominos (46), but if the US failed
133

America Betrayed

to go to war the Wall Street elite would lose billions of dollars in
the sale of armaments.
Kennedy repeatedly refused to go to war.
Kennedy would have to die.
*******
In 1945, following the surrender of Japan to Allied forces,
Viet Nam’s nationalist leader, Ho Chi Minh established the Democratic Republic of Vietnam based on the idea of “National Libertion.”
In 1946, France declared Vietnam to be a “free state.” However, as it could only be “free” within the French Union. Ho Chi
Minh’s government rebelled (47).
In 1950, China and the Soviet Union pledged to provide support to Ho Chi Minh. The U.S. countered with 15 million dollars
in aid to the French. As part of the package, the U.S. also sent
military advisors (46,47).
But it was to no avail.
Over the course of the next four years, the Vietnamese repeatedly beat back the French. In 1954, at the “Battle of
Dienbienphu” they lay siege to the French garrison at Dienbienphu
and made it impossible for French supplies to arrive by air.
France was finally defeated by the Vietnam’s nationalists (47).
The Wall Street elite decided that it was time to take matters into
their own hands and pay these “communists” a lesson. That same
year, Eisenhower and the Dulles brothers advanced the “domino”
theory (46), and warned of a communist threat to the “free world”
of southeast Asia, and a threat that would soon spread to the United
States:
“You have a row of dominoes set up. You knock over the first
one, and what will happen to the last one is the certainty that it will
go over very quickly.”
The splitting of Vietnam into two states was finally proposed,
as a means of containing the communists (46,47). As part of the
“Agreement on the Cessation of Hostilities in Vietnam” a provisional demarcation line was drawn at the 17th parallel which was
to divide Vietnam until nationwide elections are held. The United
States, however, was opposed to democratic elections. The Dulles
134

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

clique were convinced that if such elections were held, Ho Chi
Minh would win in a landslide.
On October 23, 1954, President Eisenhower wrote a letter
to Ngo Dinh Diem, President of the Council of Ministers of [South]
Vietnam, offering significant military and financial aid: “The purpose of this offer is to assist the Government of Viet-Nam in developing and maintaining a strong, viable state, capable of resisting
attempted subversion or aggression through military means.”
Considerable military and financial assistance followed. But
it was not having the desired effect. Nationalist leader, Ho Chi
Minh, was becoming ever more popular and powerful. It was apparent that his nationalist forces in the north of Viet Nam, would
soon be powerful and popular enough to drive Diem and his Western backers, from the country. The Wall Street elite proposed to
lend South Viet Nam even larger sums of money, to buy military
equipment from firms controlled by the Wall Street elites (46,47,48).
There was only one catch: It would be U.S. taxpayers who would
supply the money, and if South Viet Nam fell or defaulted, it would
be U.S. taxpayers who would reimburse the bankers.
On April 4, 1959, President Eisenhower gave a speech at
Gettysburg College, in Pennsylvania, April 4, 1959:
“Viet-Nam is a country divided into two parts, like Korea
and Germany. The southern half, with its 12 million people, is free
but poor. It is an underdeveloped country; its economy is weak,
average individual income being less than $200 a year. The northern half has been turned over to communism. A line of demarcation running along the 17th parallel separates the two. To the north
of this line stand several Communist divisions. These facts pose to
south Viet-Nam two great tasks: self-defense and economic growth.”
“For Viet-Nam’s economic growth, the acquisition of capital
is vitally necessary. [A] way for Viet-Nam to get the necessary
capital is through private investments from the outside and through
governmental loans... And there is still the other of Viet-Nam’s
great problem—how to support the military forces it needs without crushing its economy.... military as well as economic help is
currently needed in Viet-Nam... We reach the inescapable conclusion that our own national interests demand some help from us in
sustaining in Viet-Nam the morale, the economic progress, and the
135

America Betrayed

military strength necessary to its continued existence in freedom.”
*******
1959 was a pivotal year. The Dulles Wall Street clique were
hoping that with the election of their man, Nixon, as the next president of the United States, that he would launch a full scale invasion
into Cuba followed by a huge military buildup in Viet Nam (46,47).
The election of Kennedy threatened those hopes.
As early as 1951, while serving as a congressman, Kennedy
presciently observed: “The Indo-Chinese states are puppet states,
French principalities with great resources but as typical examples
of empire and colonialism as can be fond anywhere. To check the
southern drive of Communism makes sense but not only through
reliance on the force of arms. The task is, rather, to build strong
native non-Communist sentiment within these areas and rely on
that as a spearhead of defense. To do this apart from and in defiance of innately nationalistic aims spells foredoomed failure.”
And again, after his election, Kennedy stated that: “we can’t
expect these countries to do every thing the way we want to do
them. They have their own interests, their own personalities, their
own tradition. We can’t make everyone want to go in our image. In
addition, we have ancient struggles between countries....We can’t
make the world over, but we can influence the world.”
Dulles and the Wall Street bankers and arms merchants
wanted war: War with Cuba, and a long protracted, costly war with
Viet Nam.
Kennedy, however, repeatedly refused to escalate the conflict. Although there are those who claim otherwise, such as Walter
Rostow, who headed Kennedy’s State Department Policy Planning
Council, others, such as his brother (45) who served as Attorney
General, and Roger Hilsman, Kennedy’s Assistant Secretary of State
for Far Eastern Affairs, and presidential aides Kenny O’Donnell
and Dave Powers—all maintain that he had no intention of expanding the war.
Kennedy’s refusal to expand the war was also the fear of the
Pentagon and CIA. As summed up by William E. Colby, former
director of the CIA: “President Kennedy was unalterably opposed
to sending U.S. combat troops to Vietnam.”
Thus, many of those in the Pentagon, the CIA, and on Wall
136

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Street, were unalterably opposed to Kennedy as he was viewed as
soft on communism and unwilling to give them the expensive war
they craved. Many wanted to kill him (50), and for good reason —
or so they thought.
First was the refusal to invade Cuba. Second, he fires Dulles.
Third, he threatens to eviscerate the CIA. Fourth he refused to go
to war with the Soviet Union over the Cuban missile crisis in October of 1962 (44) when the right wingers, the CIA, and Pentagon
were clamoring for nuclear war. Fifth, he refused to expand the
war in Vietnam. And then, finally, and perhaps the last straw, President John F. Kennedy and Premier Nikita Khrushchev signed the
first major arms control agreement, the “Partial Test Ban Treaty”
in 1963.
With the signing of the “Partial Test Ban Treaty” outrage
erupted among the Wall Street elite, the anti-communists, the Pentagon, the CIA, and on and on. The “Partial Test Ban Treaty” threatened to halt the nuclear arms race as it banned nuclear testing in
the atmosphere, the oceans and outer space. Moreover, the Treaty
contained a preambular promise to eventually end to all nuclear
test explosions.”
American needed these weapons, the right-wing screamed.
The Soviets could never be trusted. The signing of the treaty was a
betrayal. And besides, think of all the money the government would
spend if only Kennedy were willing to engage in an expensive arm’s
race.
Kennedy was now being openly described in some circles as
a traitor. Extreme right wing groups were clamoring for his head.
Posters with a bull’s eye across his face were printed. On November 22, 1963, Kennedy was killed.
WHO KILLED KENNEDY
“The CIA was behaving during those years like a rogue elephant rampaging out of control”—Senator Frank Church, Chairman of Select Committee on Intelligence, July 1975.
Theories and speculation abound as to who killed Kennedy
and why (50,51). In the discussion which follows, we will focus
primarily on well established facts, including those reported by the
Warren Commission (52).
137

America Betrayed

What we know is that Kennedy had made a number of very
deadly enemies, including former CIA director Allen Dulles, whom
he had fired. We also know that despite his firing and his hatred for
Kennedy, Allen Dulles was appointed to the Warren Commission
which investigated Kennedy’s assassination.
And we know that General Charles Cabell, the CIA deputy
director fired by Kennedy after the Bay of Pigs, was now working
in the Pentagon. Charles Cabell’s brother, Earle Cabell, was mayor
of Dallas, the city in which Kennedy was shot.
Who else was in Dallas that morning?
Vice-President Johnson, former vice-President Nixon, FBI
director J. Edgar Hoover, Chase Manhattan bank president and future Warren Commission member John McCloy, and a George Bush
oil-business partner, George Brown (of Brown and Root). Indeed,
according to Madeleine Brown, Johnson’s mistress, these men attended a small party on the evening before the assassination, which
was hosted by Clint Murchison. According to Ms. Brown (53):
“The group . . . went behind closed doors. A short time later
Lyndon, anxious and red-faced, re-appeared. I knew how secretly
Lyndon operated. Therefore I said nothing.” When Johnson emerged
from the meeting, he squeezed “my hand so hard, it felt crushed
from the pressure, he spoke with a grating whisper, a quiet growl,
into my ear, not a love message, but one I’ll always remember:
“After tomorrow those g—d— Kennedys will never embarrass me
again - that’s no threat - that’s a promise.”
Perhaps Ms. Brown is mistaken. Perhaps Johnson never uttered such a prophetic message. However, that he disliked the
Kennedys and feared he would not be on the ticket for Kennedy’s
second term, is well known.
What we also know is that the Kennedy assassination was
carried out with military precision, by at least two marksmen who
were crack shots.
How do we know there were at least two marksmen?
As based on the testimony of witnesses who heard from seven
to eight shots, as based on Kennedy’s movements as he was shot,
and as based on the trajectories and the seven bullet holes in the
bodies of Kennedy and governor Connally.
This was also the opinion of Govenor Connally who said:
138

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

“there were either two or three people involved or more in this or
someone was shooting with an automatic rifle.”
Lee Harvey Oswald did not use or own an “automatic rifle.”
Oswald was not a marksman. According to expert testimony
presented in the Warren Commission report (52): Oswald was a
good shot, somewhat better than or equal to better than the average
let us say.’”
Kennedy —a moving target— was shot at least twice according to the Warren Report (52), and possibly four times in a
matter of seconds (50,51,54,55), i.e. in the throat and the head (52),
and in the back (50,51,54,55). According to several experts, the
head shot was actually two head shots which were almost simultaneous, one coming from the rear the other coming from the right
(55).
In addition, during that same time frame, Govenor Connally
was struck in the wrist, and in the thigh (52). And, there was a
third victim who was also wounded.
Thus, witnesses tell us that seven to eight shots were fired.
Seven bullet holes appeared in Kennedy and Connally, and a third
man was also injured. The Warren Commission believes that the
very first shot missed and was mistaken as a car backfiring (52).
Given that all these shots occurred in less than 7 seconds,
and as no automatic weapon, but only a rifle was found, it can be
concluded that there were at least two and more likely, three shooters. This latter supposition is consistent with the conclusions of
others, as well as the reports of witnesses, some of whom believed
shots were fired from the book Depository whereas many others
heard the shots coming from the Grassy Knoll. The Grassy Knoll,
which was to the right of Kennedy, and also offered the best location for an assassination. A third volley of shot may have come
from the Dallas County Records Building.
Even if we accept the Warren Commission report, is it likely
that a man who is an “average” shot would have been able to hit
Kennedy—a moving target— twice from a distance “of 177 to 266
feet” (52) with a rifle, and in less than 7 seconds? In fact, expert
marksmen, using the rifle allegedly used by Oswald, could not
duplicate the feat (50,51).
Nevertheless, according to the Warren Report (52) “the Com139

America Betrayed

mission has concluded that the shots which killed President
Kennedy and wounded Governor Connally were fired from the
sixth-floor window at the southeast corner of the Texas School Book
Depository Building. Two bullets probably caused all the wounds
suffered by President Kennedy and Governor Connally. Since the
preponderance of evidence indicates at least three shots were fired
the Commission concluded that one shot probably missed the
Presidential limousine and its occupants, and that the three shots
were fired in a time period ranging from approximately 4.8 to 7
seconds.
*******
On the morning of 11/22/1963, the Kennedy motorcade was
slowly winding its way down the streets of Dallas. Kennedy’s wife
sat beside him, and Governor John Connally and his wife, were
sitting up front in the limousine, behind the driver.
At 12:30, the motorcade arrived in Dealey Plaza and turned
right from Main to Houston Street. A few seconds later the motorcade took the 120 degrees turn into Elm Street passing the Schoolbook Depository Building where Leon Oswald allegedly lay in wait.
Just as the limousine neared the grassy knoll, a man stood up
and opened an umbrella, which he pumped in the air—as is apparent from watching the Zapruder film. It was at that moment, as the
limousine passed the Stemmons Freeway sign, that Kennedy
reached up and grabbed his throat. We know this, because it was
caught on film.
Abraham Zapruder was standing near the grassy knoll that
day filming the Kennedy motorcade. The film shows the entire assassination including the opened umbrella.
Mrs. Connally reports that she heard gunshots. She turned
and saw Kennedy putting his hands to his throat—and this is recorded in Zapruder Film Frame 225.
Mrs. Kennedy also heard the shots, which she thought might
be firecrackers. It was at this moment that she heard “terrible noises”
coming from her husband. It was gurgling sounds from the gunshot to his throat. She turned toward, and put her hands on him
when Kennedy was struck again. As detailed in Zapruder Film,
beginning with Frame 232, we see Kennedy, his hands still at his
140

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

throat, thrown forward as he is struck in the back. We also see John
Connally turning to his right, holding his Stetson in his right hand—
which means that Kennedy has been struck twice and Connally
has not been hit at all. In Zapruder Film 238, we see Connally
falling forward, as he is shot in the back. He cries out, “My god,
they’re going to kill us all.”
On the Zapruder film, we can see Ms. Kennedy, turned to
her right, facing and holding on to President Kennedy. In Zapruder
Film Frame 313, Kennedy is shot in the right temporal region of
his head and the rear portion of his skull splashes out onto the
trunk. Over a third of his brain was blown out of the back of his
skull.
We know that bullet entry wounds can be quite small. We
know that exit wounds are often quite large. We know that when a
bullet strikes an object, the object, such as a person’s head, will
move in the direction of the trajectory of the bullet. Thus we know,
based on photographic and physical evidence, that Kennedy received at least one shot from his right, which is the direction of the
grassy knoll.
Hence, based on the physical and visual (54) evidence, and
based on the Zapruder Film, Kennedy was first shot in the throat—
meaning that he was shot from the front, then in the back, and then
in the head from the right. As is also evident based on the Zapruder
film, Connally was shot in the back. However, Connally was also
shot in the wrist, and a bullet lodged in his thigh.
In addition to the seven bullet wounds in the bodies of these
two men, there was yet a eighth wound in yet another victim, James
Tague. Tague was standing near the Triple Underpass watching the
motorcade approach. When the shots rang out he was wounded by
a passing bullet.
In addition to the physical and visual evidence, a large crowd
of witnesses at Dealey plaza reported that shots were fired from
the Grassy Knoll (50,51,52). Some witnesses also stated that a whisp
of smoke was visible in the area of the Grassy Knoll. Some witnesses even claim to have seen men with rifles in downtown Dallas
before the shooting.
Photos taken from the opposite side of Elm street, shows the
grassy knoll and the heads of two men standing behind a fence,
141

America Betrayed

one of whom appears to be holding an object that some have interpreted to be a rifle (56).
There were also eyewitnesses who reported seeing cars roaming in the area behind the Grassy Knoll, some with out-of-state
license plates and extra radio antennas. Some claimed to have seen
men speaking into walkie-talkies (52).
Nevertheless, even if we were to dismiss the eye-witness
accounts, there remains the physical and visual evidence. Kennedy
was shot at least 3 separate times by 3 separate bullets. Connally
was struck by a fourth bullet. Two of the shots came from behind.
The throat shot appears to have come from the front. The head shot
came from the right.
Based on this and additional evidence, the Warren Commission in a report cosigned by the disgraced Dulles, concluded that
(52):
1. Lee Harvey Oswald was the only assassin and acted on his
own.
2. He shot from the 6th floor of the Schoolbook Depository
Building which was behind the President’s limousine at the time
of the assassination.
3. He used an Italian Mannlicher-Carchano rifle.
4. There was no conspiracy.
But what about the witnesses who claimed the shots came
from behind the grassy knoll?
Answer: They were mistaken.
What about the fact that Oswald was only an average shot?
Answer: He was lucky that day.
What about the fact that the shots came in such quick succession, that if there was a lone gunmen, he would have had to be
firing an automatic weapon?
Answer: Oswald was a lone assassin and he used a rifle.
What about the fact that foliage from the trees along the roadway would have blocked his view?
Answer: He shot through the foliage.
What about the seven bullet wounds, several of which had
different trajectories, and at least one if not two of which, came
from the right and not from the direction of the book depository
which was in the rear?
142

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Answer: A “magic bullet!”
According to the Warren Commission (52) a single bullet
caused the seven wounds of Kennedy and Connally. Conveniently,
this magic bullet (Commission Exhibit #399) was found in an almost pristine condition at Parkland Memorial hospital lying on a
stretcher. And the near perfect bullet had been fired from an Italian

143

America Betrayed

Again, however, we are told by the Warren Commission (52)
that Ruby acted alone, and that there was “no conspiracy.”
There was no conspiracy, according to the Warren Report.
Yet, according to the Dallas Morning Star, which on November 22,
1963, published details describing the route of Kennedy’s motorcade, Kennedy was supposed to go straight down Main Street. However, it did not go down Main street. Instead it turned onto Houston
and then Elm Street which not only offered the perfect street for a
triangulated assassinated attempt from three directions, but which
required Kennedy’s limousine to turn and slow almost to a crawl
as it neared the grassy knoll.
The Warren Commission claimed that the reason the route
was changed was that it is impossible to go from Main Street onto
Stemmons Freeway. Which is not true.
Numerous witnesses, including traffic patrolman Joe Smith
testified that nothing would have prevented the motorcade from
going directly down Main Street and on to the Stemmons Freeway
(52 p. 538).
Who was in a position to change the route?
The secret service?
The Dallas police?
The mayor of Dallas?
Coincidentally, the mayor of Dallas, on the day of the assassination, was Earle Cabell, the brother of the Charles Cabell, the
former deputy director of the CIA who, along with Dulles, had
been fired by Kennedy in 1961.
Another coincidence. Eighteen material witnesses died during the three-year period which followed the murder of President
Kennedy - six by gunfire, three in motor accidents, two by suicide,
one from a cut throat, one from a karate chop to the neck, three
from heart attacks and two from natural causes.
Yet another oddity. The man who pumped the umbrella was
never sought and never questioned by the Warren Commission.
Neither was the man who sat next to “umbrella man” even though
a photograph of both indicates that he appeared to be speaking into
a handheld radio with a long antenna.
And yet another oddity. The Zapruder film, was quickly
snapped-up by Life magazine for $250,000.00., and then locked
144

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

away so that there would be no public viewing. Instead, the magazine published a series of still photos, lifted from the Zapruder
film, showing Kennedy being shot. However, Life magazine published several of the photos in reverse order, thus making it falsely
look as if Kennedy had been shot in the head, from behind, with
his head lurching forward. Until the film was shown to Americans
in its entirety, in 1975, no one was the wiser.
Who owned Life magazine in 1963? Henry Luce, a close
personal friend of Allen Dulles, the Director of the CIA. Henry
Luce was an alumni of Skull and Bones (class of 1920).
Who purchased the Zapruder film for Life magazine? C.J.
Jackson, formerly a “psychological warfare” consultant to the CIA.
And then there is the evidence, presented in the Warren Report (52), which indicates Oswald was an average shot. According
to data provided by the “Records Branch, Personnel Department,
Headquarters US. Marine Corps” Oswald received a “sharpshooter
qualification as a ‘fairly good shot’ and a low marksman rating as a
‘rather poor shot.’”
As stated in the Warren Report (52): “Major Anderson concluded: ‘I would say that as compared to other Marines receiving
the same type of training, that Oswald was a good shot, somewhat
better than or equal to better than the average let us say.’”
The Warren Commission using a stationary target, “had expert riflemen fire the assassination weapon from a tower at three
silhouette targets at distances of 175, 240, and 265 feet. The assassination rifle [was] mounted with [a] telescopic sight. Three marksmen, rated as master by the National Rifle Association, each fired
two series of three shots. In the first series the firers required time
spans of 4.6, 6.75, and 8.25 seconds respectively [in order to get
off three shots]. The marksmen took as much time as they wanted
for the first target and all hit the target. For the first four attempts,
the firers missed the second shot by several inches.”
In another test, “the three FBI experts...fired three shots from
the weapon at 15 yards in 6, 7, and 9 seconds. At 15 yards each
man’s shots landed within the size of a dime. The shots fired by
Frazier at the range of 25 yards landed within an area of 2 inches
and 5 inches respectively. Frazier later fired four groups of three
shots at a distance of 100 yards in 5.9, 6.2, 5.6, and 6.5 seconds.
145

America Betrayed

Each series of three shots...were a few inches high and to the right
of the target.”
Thus, when experts were given “as much time as they wanted”
to shoot at a stationary target, all “missed the second shot by several inches.” Likewise, when their best expert, Frazier, fired the
weapon in three separate tests, and at a motionless target, he missed
all three times.
And let us be clear. Shooting at a still target is much easier
than a moving target, and Kennedy’s vehicle and his body were in
motion. And, Oswald did not have “as much time as they wanted.”
Nevertheless, although their own experts repeatedly failed
in these tests under stress free conditions and using a still target,
the Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald, whose
shooting skills were “better than or equal to better than the average” was the lone assassin, and that there was “no conspiracy.”
No conspiracy?
The Warren Report itself appears to be a conspiracy of incompetence. The Warren Report is an 26 volume, 888 page morass
of often irrelevant questions and incomplete answers with witnesses
often being cut off before they can reply to questions. A number of
witnesses were told they need not answer as investigators had questioned them in another setting—that is, off the record. The report is
also padded with hundreds of pages of insignificant and irrelevant
testimony and exhibits, such as pictures of Oswald’s pubic hairs
and Jack Ruby’s mother’s dental charts. The 26 volumes were not
arranged in any logical manner and there is no index. However,
whereas often irrelevant witnesses are questioned at length, many
of those who were at the scene were never questioned at all. Moreover, many who were questioned complained later that their testimony was altered, or that they were pressured and intimidated by
investigators who made it clear that they did not believe the witness.
Who served on the Warren Commission?
The leader of the pack was Allen Dulles, former director of
the CIA. A curious choice. Dulles had been fired by Kennedy because Kennedy believed Dulles was untrustworthy and a liar. What
kind of man was Allen Dulles? He was a man who had been in
business with Nazis, who sought to have SS chief and mass mur146

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

derer Heinrich Himmler take the place of Hitler, and who had recruited Nazi mass murderers for his CIA and into the Republican
party (1,2,5,6,10,11,12,18). Whereas his Nazi partners tortured and
killed millions, Dulles and his CIA were directly responsible for
the mass murder and torture of 100s of thousands of men, women,
and children (13,35). Dulles was a killer. He had a Nazi-mentality.
Second in command: John McCloy, chairman of Chase Manhattan bank (59)—a bank owned by the Rockefellers, and a bank
that was used as a Nazi front and which laundered Nazi funds, and
which stole tens of millions of dollars from Jews who were being
murdered and worked to death in the concentration camps being
run by Rockefeller business partner, IG Farben (1,2,60,61,62). Indeed, Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan bank (like the Bush-Harriman
gang) continued its relationship with the Nazis even after Pearl
Harbor, and after the Nazis declared war on the U.S. It was because of Chase/Rockefeller collusion with the Nazis that law suits
were filed by victims of its business practices (60,61). Chase and
other Nazi-banks were forced to pay millions of dollars in compensation to those it stole from and who were murdered and whose
property was seized by its Nazi business partners.
Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and a former
Dulles-Rockefeller protégé, was basically third in command. At
the urgings of Dulles and Rockefeller, Earl Warren had been chosen to serve as the 1948 Republican vice-presidential candidate on
the ticket headed by Thomas Dewey. They ran against Truman,
accusing him and the Democrats of being communist sympathizers. They lost.
Having Dulles and McCloy head the Warren Commission is
tantamount to having “murder incorporated” investigate itself.
Dulles had the motive and certainly the means to kill Kennedy (63)
as did his CIA lieutenants (64). Let us also recall that McCloy
attended a private meeting the night before, which was attended by
Nixon, Hoover, and Johnson, at the end of which comments were
made to the effect that Kennedy would be no more (53).
Other commissioners included, Democratic Senator Russell,
Republican Senator Cooper, Republican congressman Gerald Ford,
and Democratic congressman Hale Boggs.
And then there is yet another Yale Skull and Bones connec147

America Betrayed

tion. Arlen Specter, who graduated from Yale Law School, served
as assistant counsel and investigator for the Warren Commission.
Specter is credited with coming up with the “magic bullet” theory.
Warren Commission investigator Specter was promised a
political career leading to a Senate seat by the money men, and
Specter was elected, first as a District Attorney (in a heavily democratic district) and then to the senate with their help. Specter became chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. As
a Republic Senator, he has been described by his Senate colleagues
as “a partisan hatchet man serving at the behest of the Senate Republican leadership” and “he has been criticized by some of his
Republican colleagues on the Judiciary Committee for being too
loose with the facts. They refuse to put their names on reports he
authored” (65). One of Specter’s attributes is the ability to dig up
or manufacture “dirt” which he uses to intimidate, destroy, or manipulate his enemies, and those of the Republican leadership
(65).
Boggs later complained that FBI director Hoover had ordered
his aides to compile secret dossiers on each member of the Warren
Commission so he would have adequate dirt in his files to apply
certain pressures if a need arose. Boggs also complained that “Gestapo tactics” were applied on Commissioners to accept the Dulles,
McCloy, Specter version of the evidence (66). Soon after making
these statements, Boggs was killed.
LEE HARVEY OSWALD & THE U2 SPY SHOOT DOWN
“While in the Air Force, I will be treated like any other enlisted man... Keeping the secret will be a part of my training —
learning to live my cover” -Phillip Agee described his experience
in becoming a CIA officer with a military cover.
Who was Lee Harvey Oswald?
Oswald had served in the Marines where he received training in the Russian language. While in the Marines in 1957 and
1958, Oswald was also stationed at Atsugi Air Base in Japan (52),
the home of the largest CIA station in the Pacific, and the home
base of the super-secret U2 spy plane. There he worked as a radar
operator (67).
After Oswald left the Marine Corps in September of 1959,
148

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

he traveled to the Soviet Union where he sought to renounce his
citizenship (52). Where he obtained the financing for his trip,
$1,500.00 (in 1959 dollars) is unknown, given his low salary as an
enlisted man.
On October 31, 1959, while living in the Soviet Union,
Oswald went to the American Embassy to renounce his U.S. citizenship. Mr. Richard E. Snyder, senior consular official at the
Embassy, testified that Oswald was bright, articulate, self-confident and seemed “to know what his mission was. He took charge,
in a sense, of the conversation right from the beginning” (52).
Oswald was given a rent-free apartment in Minsk, near where
an espionage training academy was located.
Why had Oswald gone to the Soviet Union?
In 1959, President Dwight Eisenhower took the first bold
step to end the cold war with the Soviet Union. He took these steps
despite vehement opposition from the Pentagon, his advisors, and
the Dulles clique (68). The Dulles brother, Allen, head of the CIA,
and John, Secretary of State, were calling for “united action” by
the Western and Asian Allies to oppose the communists. John
Dulles wanted more than “containment,” but “liberation” from
communism, in the form of “massive retaliation.”
In a speech given on January 12, 1954, Dulles called upon
the President to develop “a great capacity to retaliate instantly, by
means and at places of our own choosing,” including the indiscriminate use of atomic weapons for attacking Moscow.
Dulles was accused, however, of wishing to go to war not
because he was against communism, but to make his banking and
arm’s merchant friends on Wall Street fabulously wealthy (68).
Indeed, he was repeatedly accused in the early 1950s, of acting
less like a statesman and more “like a corporation lawyer serving
his clients.”
Dulles called his political philosophy, “brinkmanship,” that
is, a willingness to go the brink of war, and then over the brink, and
to massively retaliate, and destroy, with atomic bombs, all those
he deemed to be enemies of Wall Street and the United States.
Eisenhower’s golfing partner, Senator Prescott Bush, was
urging the same strategy.
President Eisenhower, however, wanted to end the cold war
149

America Betrayed

and the arm’s race with the Soviet Union (69). Contrary to Dulles
and Bush, Eisenhower wanted to reduce weapons production and
defense spending. Hence, in 1959, Eisenhower and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev agreed to meet in Paris, in May 1960, to
discuss a test ban and arms reductions treaty (69,70).
But then an international incident, made the meeting impossible to hold and destroyed all hopes of an arm’s reduction treaty—
much to the delight of hawks on both the Soviet and American
side.
Since 1956, Eisenhower had authorized the U2, an ultra-light,
high-flying spy plane, to conduct secret reconnaissance missions
over the Soviet Union (70). The reason he approved these missions
was that he did not believe the reports he was getting from Dulles
and the CIA, which claimed a Soviet military superiority.
Eisenhower hoped that the information obtained from these flights
would silence the war-mongers in his administration and on Wall
Street. The Soviets lacked the interceptor aircraft and missiles to
shoot down the U2, so Eisenhower was confident that he could
always deny their existence.
At the insistence of Allen Dulles and gang, Eisenhower reluctantly agreed to one last flight, just as the Paris summit approached. On May 1, 1960, U2 pilot Frances Gary Powers was
detected and then shot down as he crossed the Soviet Union (70).
A belligerent Khrushchev was enraged and canceled the summit.
There was jubilation on Wall Street and in the Dulles’ households.
Shortly thereafter, less than 18 months after his defection,
and 6 months after Gary Powers had been shot down, Oswald —
who had been stationed at Atsugi Air Base in Japan, the home of
the largest CIA station in the Pacific and the super-secret U2 spy
plane— opened negotiations with the U.S. Embassy in Moscow
(52). Amazingly, Oswald was not only granted permission to immediately return to the United States but he was allowed to bring
his new Russian wife, with the U.S. picking up the tab!
Why?
As detailed in the Warren Report (52) “Oswald’s mother, Mrs.
Marguerite Oswald, testified before the [Warren] Commission that
150

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

she believes her son went to Russia and returned as an undercover
agent for the U.S. Government. Mrs. Oswald mentioned the belief
that her son was an agent to a State Department representative whom
he visited in January 1961.”
“In 1962 Oswald had told Pauline Bates, a public stenographer in Fort Worth, Tex., that he had become a ‘secret agent’ of the
U.S. Government and that he was soon going back to Russia ‘or
Washington.’ Mrs. Bates...’thought that maybe he was going over
under the auspices of the State Department as a student or something.’”
“The Commission has also examined a report that, not long
before the assassination, Oswald may have received unaccounted
funds through money orders sent to him in Dallas. Five days after
the assassination, C. A. Hamblen, early night manager for the Western Union Telegraph Co. in Dallas, told his superior that about 2
weeks earlier he remembered Oswfco

151

America Betrayed

leans branch of the “organization called ‘Fair Play for Cuba,’ he
stated his desire that he should be accepted as a ‘friend’ of the
Cuban Revolution.” He insisted that he was entitled to the Cuban
visa because of his background, partisanship, and personal activities on behalf of the Cuban movement. He engaged in an angry
argument with the consul who finally told him that “as far as he
was concerned he would not give him a visa” and that “a person
like him [Oswald] in place of aiding the Cuban Revolution, was
doing it harm.”
According to the Warren Report (52): “Oswald’s activities
with regard to Cuba raise serious questions as to how much he
might have been motivated in the assassination by a desire to aid
the Castro regime.”
The Warren Commission “found no evidence that the extreme
views expressed toward President Kennedy by some right-wing
groups centered in Dallas or any other general atmosphere of hate
or right-wing extremism which may have existed in the city of
Dallas had any connection with Oswald’s actions on November
22, 1963.”
In 1992 the KGB released dossier #31451: the Oswald file.
Among the revelations: the KGB suspected that the American defector was a CIA operative.
*******
Oswald, before he was killed, claimed that he was a patsy,
that he had been set up (52).
But why?
To justify an attack on Cuba?
As detailed in a book by James Bamford “Body of Secrets,”
and as reported by David Ruppe, ABC News.com (5/1/2001), in
the months before Kennedy was gunned down the “U.S. Military
drafted plans to terrorize U.S. cities to provoke war with Cuba.”
The plans included the killing of innocent people and [to] commit
acts of terrorism in U.S. cities [in order] to create public support for
a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans
reportedly included assassination, hijacking planes, blowing up a
U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public
152

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

and the international community into supporting a war to oust
Cuba’s then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.”
The media was also to be manipulated. Top Generals are
quoted as saying “casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a
helpful wave of national indignation.”
The military and “the Joint Chiefs of Staff even proposed
using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first
attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with
Cuba.” The military argued that “the objective” in killing Glenn,
“is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists.”
According to ABC news, “The plans had the written approval
of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President
Kennedy’s defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962.”
If they were willing to kill John Glenn in order to provoke
war with Cuba, given their laundry list of gripes about Kennedy,
why not kill him instead?
Fidel Castro was alarmed by the links being made between
Oswald and Cuba. According to National Security Agency documents, Castro was terrified the U.S. would retaliate against Cuba
in the first hours after the assassination. He feared the assassination would give the U.S. a pretext for invading his country and
toppling his rule.
Many in the CIA, Pentagon, and on Wall Street were planning on exactly that.
Was Oswald a CIA agent? An “undercover agent?” Some
think so (71), including his mother (52).
It would be a neat trick, indeed, to train Oswald as a CIA
agent, use him to provide info resulting in the downing of Gary
Power’s U2 spy plane, and then bring him back, set him up for a
mission which he knows little about, put him in that book depository, have 3 expert CIA marksmen kill Kennedy, and then, have
Oswald, the communist defector and friend of Cuba, take the blame.
At least from the perspective of a “thought experiment”
Oswald would have been the perfect patsy and the perfect “patriot.” Oswald not only puts a stop to an arms control agreement
with the communist Soviet Union back in 1960, but in 1963, he
serves as a trigger that might ignite a war with Russia and Cuba.
153

America Betrayed

However, Cuba was not attacked. Instead, Lyndon Johnson,
upon becoming president, escalated the war in Vietnam.
The Wall Street elite, the war mongers, were delirious with
joy. Billions of dollars would be spent and were spent fighting the
Vietnam war. The war was a cash cow.
War has always been good for business.
The death of Kennedy had resulted in war.
Dulles and the Bush-Harriman-Rockefeller gang, had won
again.
HOWARD HUNT, ASSASSINATION & GEORGE BUSH
Eleven years later, George W. Bush was terrified. Nixon was
about to be impeached for the coverup of Watergate, and it had
been revealed that Nixon had tape-recorded his own White House
conversations. Among the incriminating remarks made on the White
House tapes, were comments about the “Texans,” the “Cubans”
and “the Bay of Pigs.”
According to Haldeman (72) Nixon’s chief of staff (31),
Nixon always used code words when talking about the 1963 murder of Kennedy, referring to the assassination as “the Bay of Pigs.”
In that same tape (31), Nixon also discussed Robert
Mosbacher, George Bush’s partner. The “Texans” were most likely
George Bush, Robert Mosbacher and Jim Baker. The “Cubans”
some suspect, is a reference to the men who assassinated Kennedy,
i.e. the “Bay of Pigs.”
Watergate burglar E. Howard Hunt, was a CIA-operative,
linked to the “Cubans,” the “Bay of Pigs,” the assassination of
Kennedy, and to George H.W. Bush. In fact, four other Watergate
burglars were also associated with the CIA and the anti-Castro
movement, including Mr. Martinez who was still on a CIA retainer
at the time of the burglary (31).
When Martinez was questioned by judge Sirica, Martinez
said, “When it comes to Cuba and when it comes to Communist
conspiracies involving the United States, I will do anything to protect this country against any Communist conspiracy” (31).
In 1961, George Bush (despite his denials) was a CIA-operative (73), and was linked to E. Howard Hunt (30), the “Cubans”
and the “Bay of Pigs” (30,73), and the assassination of President
154

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Kennedy (73).
As noted, acting FBI director Gray, destroyed the files taken
from the White House safe of Howard Hunt after he was warned
they were “political dynamite” and should “never see the light of
day.” Some of those files pertained directly to President Kennedy
(31).
When the Supreme Court ruled against Nixon, and he had
been ordered to turn over his secret White House tapes, George
Bush was so scared that others in the Nixon White House had wryly
remarked that Bush had “turned into assholes and shit himself to
death” (74).
George W. Bush had a lot of reasons to “shit” his pants.
For one, there was the problem involving Watergate burglar
E. Howard Hunt, the CIA operative who some believed played a
role in Kennedy’s assassination (75). Hunt was a member of the
White House “plumbers,” the secret team assembled to perform a
number of covert and illegal services for the Republicans (29).
Hunt’s phone number was found in the address book belonging to one of the Watergate burglars (31). It was this phone number
which enabled reporters and investigators to link the break-in to
President Nixon and his reelection campaign. Later it was discovered that Hunt and another former CIA operative, Gordon Liddy,
were at the scene and directing the burglary (31).
Hunt, after his arrest, was issuing a thinly veiled threat to
talk and spill his guts to Congressional investigators unless he received hush money (31). Hunt was immediately given $75,000.
As detailed by Bernstein and Woodward (31): “the covert
activities” the Nixon White House was seeking to cover up, “involve the whole U.S. intelligence community...The cover up was
mainly to protect the covert operations. The president, himself, has
been blackmailed.”
What would Hunt talk about that warranted an immediate
payoff?
Three years after Watergate, Hunt was accused in an article
published by the Liberty Lobby, a conservative, right wing organization, of being linked to the Kennedy assassination (75). Just as
Hunt had been at the Watergate directing the burglary, it was being
suggesting that Hunt was in Dallas on the day of the shooting.
155

America Betrayed

Hunt sued in Federal Court, and lost an appeal in 1985.
The forewoman of the jury said that she and the jury believed that the CIA had killed the president, and that Hunt had
played a role in the assassination.
Indeed, Hunt had been playing a role in the assassination
and overthrow of democratically elected leaders and presidents,
since the 1950s (35,76). After his first successful mission, against
the democratically elected president of Guatemala in 1953, Hunt
admitted that the real reason for the coup had little to do with communism, and that he had been fooled into serving the interests of
Wall Street and the Dulles clan. “I felt a little bit betrayed when I
learned that, because I thought, ‘Hey, you know, I’m working for
the United States of America, I’m not a hireling for United Fruit.’
But I went ahead with my assigned tasks in any case, and if United
Fruit benefited from it, that was part of the set game” (76).
One of Hunt’s next major missions was Cuba. “ I was yanked
back from [where I was stationed in] Montevideo...and told: ‘What
we’re doing is reassembling the ÔPB Success’ team’ — that is, the
Guatemala operational team — ‘to take care of Castro.’ My role
was very similar to what it had been in the Guatemalan project; I
was located down here in Miami, in Coconut Grove; I was equipped
with a safe house. And by that time, several hundred thousand Cuban
exiles had come over here and made their home here. President
Ydigoras Fuentes of Guatemala was good enough to give our Cuban exiles a training area in two training areas in his country...”
And then the “Bay of Pigs “fiasco, which left Hunt, the Cuban exiles, and the CIA fuming and enraged at Kennedy.
Notable in Hunt’s interview with CNN are his remarks regarding CIA “training areas” in South America.
Two formerly secret documents, “FBI, Operation Condor
Cable,” dated, 9/28/1975, and “FBI, Operation Condor Cable,” dated
9/28/1976, detail how U.S. intelligence agencies oversee and coordinate a network of Chilean, Argentinean and Paraguayan secret
police agencies which provide “special teams” trained by the CIA,
and which travel “anywhere in the world... to carry out assassinations,” including the assassination of political opponents in the
United States.
One of the teams of Cuban exiles that were to attack Cuba,
156

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

had receiving special training in South America. Many of these
individuals were then flown to south Florida where they waited for
the signal to attack.
Like E. Howard Hunt, many of these individuals came to the
conclusion that they had been betrayed by Kennedy.
One year after Hunt’s CNN interview (76) detailed above,
former CIA officer Victor Marchetti alleged in the August 14, 1978
edition of The Spotlight, a Washington newspaper, that “some of
the figures in the [Kennedy assassination] conspiracy” included
“Howard Hunt, Gerry Hemming, a long-time Cuba mercenary, and
Frank Sturgis, one of Hunt’s fellow Watergate burglars.” In that
same article, it was alleged that George Bush also played a role in
the Kennedy assassination and it was suggested that the link was
Hunt and the Cubans who had been trained for the failed Bay of
Pigs invasion of Cuba.
These allegations, of course came after Watergate and the
fall of Nixon. In 1974, at the height of the Watergate investigation,
George H.W. Bush was faced with the possibility that the entire
damn might break and that the avalanche of material that might be
uncovered could bury him alive.
Bush was so frightened, he “broke out into assholes and shit
himself to death.”
If Nixon was impeached, the investigation would follow the
money trail, the Bay of Pigs trail, the E. Howard Hunt trail, the
Kennedy trail, and it might lead to George H.W. Bush.
BUSH & THE BAY OF PIGS
In 1959 George W. Bush began running his Zapata oil company from a headquarters in Houston. He also spent a lot of time in
Louisiana and Florida, where Zapata was drilling off shore, for oil.
That same year, Dulles began preparing for the coming invasion of Cuba, and a major part of the operation was being run out
of Guatemala and South Florida—Bush country.
In a briefing to President Kennedy in the Cabinet Room on
March 29, 1961, Richard Bissell of the CIA, mentioned that the
CIA code name for the Bay of Pigs invasion was “Operation Zapata”
(77).
Seven landing craft and support ships were used in the Bay
157

America Betrayed

of Pigs invasion. One was named “Houston” and another, “Barbara” (78)—which coincidentally is the name of Bush’s wife.
Houston, of course, was the headquarters of Bush’s Zapata oil company.
Coincidences, of course.
Bush was also working for the CIA at this time, and, as noted,
was spending a lot of time in south Florida.
According to Joseph McBride of The Nation (73),”a source
with close connections to the intelligence community confirms that
Bush started working for the agency in 1960 or 1961, using his oil
business as a cover for clandestine activities.”
We do not know with 100% certainty if Bush played a role in
the Bay of Pigs fiasco. However, we do know that E. Howard Hunt
was a Bay of Pigs veteran CIA operative. So too was Watergate
burglar, Frank Sturgis.
The official CIA name for the Bay of Pigs invasion, was
known as “JM/WAVE.” Even after the Bay of Pigs “JM/WAVE
became a continuing and extended Miami operation, the CIA’s largest in the continental United States” (41).
Many of those who had trained for the invasion, were trained
in South America in the same camps where “special teams” trained
by the CIA, are sent “anywhere in the world... to carry out assassinations,” including the assassination of political leaders (63).
Likewise, just as E. Howard Hunt was seething with rage
against Kennedy, so too were many in the Cuban exile community
who wanted revenge for the death of their friends, comrades, brothers, sons and fathers, on the beaches of Cuba. They all blamed
Kennedy and many wanted to kill him.
Their hatred was inflamed even further when, in 1962
Kennedy shut down a CIA program that was preparing for another
invasion (Operation Mongoose). The crack down on Cuban exiles
continued into 1963 with Kennedy shutting down their paramilitary training camps in Louisiana and Florida—both locations also
being states where Bush was doing business.
Many of these men were linked not just to the CIA, but to
George H.W. Bush. As pointed out by Georgie A. Geyer (81), “an
entire new Cuban cadre emerged from the Bay of Pigs. The names
Howard Hunt, Bernard Barker, Rolando Martinez, Felix Rodriguez
158

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

and Eugenio Martinez would, in the next quarter century, pop up,
often decisively, over and over again in the most dangerous American foreign policy crises. There were Cubans flying missions for
the CIA in the Congo and even for the Portuguese in Africa; Cubans were the burglars of Watergate; Cubans played key roles in
Nicaragua, in Irangate, in the American move into the Persian Gulf.”
Cubans everywhere, and all working for the CIA in operations linked to George Bush. And not just Cubans, but CIA operative, E. Howard Hunt who was linked to assassination of Kennedy,
and who, following his arrest as a Watergate burglar, was threatening to talk.
Hunt was implicated in the Kennedy assassination, Cubans
trained by the CIA were suspected of involvement, and so to was
George Bush.
Consider, for example, a secret FBI memo, written by FBI
director Hoover which had been accidentally released (79). In that
memo (dated 11/29/63) it is stated that “George Bush of the CIA”
was being kept informed about the Warren Commission investigation and the assassination of Kennedy as it pertained to the Cuban
exile community and any forthcoming attack on Cuba (79). The
substance of the letter, is that “George W. Bush of the CIA” was in
some way linked with the anti-Castro groups in Florida, which were
in turn linked to Hunt and the assassination of Kennedy.
Hunt was still seething about Kennedy and the debacle in
Cuba 10 years later, and both Hunt and Sturgis are alleged to have
been in Dallas on the day of Kennedy’s assassination.
As noted, Hunt was even accused of being involved in the
Kennedy assassination by a CIA agent, in an article that appeared
in a magazine published by Liberty Lobby. Hunt sued in Federal
Court for defamation and lost.
The CIA was so alarmed by these allegations that the “Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States” (the Rockefeller
Commission) sought to refute them in its 1975 report (80).
The Rockefellers and Bush family had been in business together for decades, and Bush was a CIA agent in 1960, and later
became director of the CIA—the same CIA whose agents were
implicated in the assassination of Kennedy, and the same CIA whose
director had been fired by Kennedy and who then sat on the War159

America Betrayed

ren Commission which served largely as a vehicle to cover up the
crime.
According to an article written by Joseph McBride and published in the July 1988 issue of The Nation, Bush was involved in
the Kennedy assassination. McBride’s source observed: “I know
[Bush] was involved in the Caribbean [Bay of Pigs] I know he was
involved in the suppression of things after the Kennedy assassination.”
*******
On March 8, 1974, as cries for Nixon’s impeachment grew
ever louder, George H.W. Bush, chairman of the Republican National Committee, began making frantic phone calls. He “was having trouble keeping the party professionals in line” (74). An impeachment vote was becoming a certainty, and who knows where
the investigation might lead.
“What in the world do we do now?” asked Bush. Bush was
panicking, threatening to pack up and run (74). Finally, Bush and
friends, including Republicans in congress, began suggesting that
Nixon should resign in order to put a stop to any impeachment
investigation.
Party loyalists, however, were outraged by the idea (74). Of
course, most did not realize that it was not just Nixon’s Presidency
which was at stake, but the reputations and lives of those whose
dirty secrets would be exposed if congress voted for impeachment.
What was not yet clear, however, was if there were enough
votes for impeachment. It all depended on what Nixon may or
may not have said on the tapes he secretly made of his own conversations in the White House.
And then the transcripts of the tapes were ordered released
after a protracted court fight. The Nixon team began making transcripts of the tapes, including one that sent Bush and others into
paroxysmals of fear.
Somebody asked John Dean, Nixon’s counsel, “Does Bush
know about the transcript yet?
“Yes.”
“Well, what did he do?”
“He broke out into assholes and shit himself to death” was
160

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

the reply (74).
What was on the tape?
The media referred to it as the “smoking gun.”
Nixon had taped himself, on June 23, 1972, discussing with
his Chief of Staff, H.R. Haldeman, how best to stop the FBI investigation into the CIA-Watergate burglary. They were worried the
investigation would expose their connection to “the Bay of Pigs
thing.”
According to Haldeman, in his book “The Ends of Power”,
Nixon always used code words when talking about the 1963 murder of Kennedy, referring to the assassination as “the Bay of Pigs.”
In that same tape, Nixon also discussed Robert Mosbacher,
George Bush’s partner. He also referred repeatedly to the “Cubans”
and the “Texans.” The “Texans” being George Bush, Jim Baker,
and Robert Mosbacher.
Yet another tape was even more incriminating. It contained
an 18-minute gap. Six court-appointed electronics experts said that
the gap was created after the tape had been erased and erased yet
again, five separate times.
An impeachment inquiry would certainly lead to a lot of questions, that Bush and friends would prefer not be asked.
Bush was almost dumb with fear.
It was clear Nixon would be impeached. Who knows what
might be revealed if the impeachment hearings became wide ranging and delved into other the crimes committed by the White House
and Nixon’s associates?
An investigation would result in the opening up of a flood
gates of crimes and treasonable acts committed by officials in the
CIA, FBI, and the Republican Party. Everything having to do
with the “Bay of Pigs,” the “Cubans” the “Texans” might come to
light.
No wonder Bush “broke out into assholes and shit himself to
death.”
Bush was terrified, almost dumb with fear. The situation was
deteriorating. A lot of people were in a panic. They simply could
not allow an impeachment investigation to proceed.
Either Nixon would have to die, or he would have to resign.
Frantic meetings were held. Emissaries were sent to consult
161

America Betrayed

with Nixon who was already being blackmailed (31). The horrible
consequences of an impeachment investigation were explained.
On August 9, 1974, Richard Nixon resigned.
He was then pardoned by his hand-picked successor, Gerald
Ford—former Warren Commissioner.
By pardoning Nixon, Ford insured that there would be no
investigation.
After Ford became president, Rockefeller was chosen to be
the new Vice-President. George Bush would become director of
the CIA.
As to E. Howard Hunt, he would spend 33 months in prison.
The cover-up was a success.
The Dulles-Bush-Rockefeller gang, had won again.

NOTES
1). John Loftus and Mark Aarons. “The Secret War Against The Jews”
St. Martins Press, New York, 1994;
2). Anthony Sutton, “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler,” Charles
Higham, “Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money
Plot 1933-1949,” Delacorte Press, 1983; Christopher Simpson, “The Splendid Blond Beast.”
3). The Dulles family believed themselves to be of royal blood, claiming they could “ trace its ancestry to Charlemagne” (New York Times 5/25/
1959 ). The Dulles family had also been intimately involved in American
politics since the 1800s, and were not just influential but rich. John Watson
Foster, the Dulles brother’s grandfather, became a brigadier general in the
Civil War, United States Minister to Mexico and Russia, Secretary of State
under President Benjamin Harrison, and amassed a huge fortune. The Dulles
brothers first sought access to the White House in 1940, supporting a Republican lawyer for the “mob,” Thomas E. Dewey, for President. Dewey
lost the nomination to Wendell L. Willkie in 1940 (who in turn lost to
Roosevelt). Dewey again sought the Presidency, with Dulles acting as his
chief advisor, but lost to Roosevelt in 1944 and then again in 1948, when he
lost to Truman. Dewey became governor of New York.
4). Allen Dulles, “From Hitler’s Doorstep: The Wartime Intelligence
Reports of Allen Dulles, 1942-1945,” Pennsylvania State Univ Press, 1996;
Allen Dulles, “The Secret Surrender.”
5). BBC News, 9/17/2001; UPI 9/20/2000; National Archives, 9/17/
162

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

2001; Charles Higham, “American Swastika: The Shocking Story of Nazi
Collaborators in Our Midst from 1933 to the Present Day,” Doubleday,
1985.
6). Burton Hersh, “The Old Boys: The American Elite and the Origins of the CIA,” Tree Farm Books, 2001.
7). Heinz Hohne. The Order of the Death’s Head.” Ballantine, New
York. 1967.
8). J. Toland. “Adolf Hitler,” Doubleday, New York, 1976; W. L.
Shirer. “The Rise & Fall of the Third Reich.” Fawcett World Library, New
York, 1960.
9). Anthony Sutton, “America’s Secret Establishment: An introduction to The Order of Skull & Bones” Liberty House, New York. 1986; Ron
Rosenbaum, “The Last Secrets of Skull and Bones,” Esquire Magazine,
September, 1977; Peggy Alder-Robohm, “Skull and Bones — Bush’s Boy’s
Club,” Covert Action Quarterly No. 33, 1990; John Schrag, “Skeleton in
His Closet,” Willamette Week, September 19-25, 1991; David W. Dunlap,
“Yale Society Resists Peeks Into Its Crypt,” New York Times, 11/4/88.
10). Christopher Simpson, “Blowback.”
11). National Archives, 9/17/2001; UPI 9/20/2000.
12). T. H. Tetens, “The New Germany and the Old Nazis.”
13). Audrey R. Kahin, George McT Kahin, “Subversion As Foreign
Policy: The Secret Eisenhower and Dulles Debacle in Indonesia;” University of Washington Press, 1997; Vitaly, Syrokomsky, “International Terrorism and the CIA: Documents, Eyewitness Reports, Facts,” Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1983; James A. Bill, “ The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations,” Yale University Press, 1988; R. Harris
Smith, “OSS: The Secret History of America’s First Central Intelligence
Agency,” University of California Press, 1972; Fletcher Prouty, “The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the U.S. and the World,”
Prentice Hall, 1973; Jonathan Kwitney, “The Crimes of Patriots: A True
Tale of Dope, Dirty Money & the CIA,” WW Norton, 1987; Rodney Stich,
“Defrauding America: A Pattern Of Related Scandals — Dirty Secrets Of
The CIA And Other Government Operations,” Diablo Western Press, 1993;
William Blum, “Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Intervention Since
WWII,” Common Courage Press, 1995; Report to the President by the
Commission on CIA Activities Within the United States, Washington, DC.
1975.
14). R. Harris Smith, “OSS: The Secret History of America’s First
Central Intelligence Agency,” University of California Press, 1972.
15). The Central Intelligence Agency Act, 1949. United States Congress.
16). John Stockwell, “The Secret Wars of the CIA.” Speech given on
163

America Betrayed

10/10/1987.
17). Richard Milhous Nixon, “The Memoirs of Richard Nixon,” Richard Nixon Library Editions, 1990.
18). Russell Bowen, “The Immaculate Deception;” Charles Higham,
“American Swastika: The Shocking Story of Nazi Collaborators in Our
Midst from 1933 to the Present Day,” Doubleday, 1985; T. H. Tetens, “The
New Germany and the Old Nazis;” Christopher Simpson, “Blowback;” Robert J. Groden & Harrison Edward Livingstone, “High Treason.”
19). Robert J. Groden & Harrison Edward Livingstone, “High Treason.”
20). James Petras & Morris Morley, “The United States and Chile:
Imperialism and the Overthrow of the Allende Government,” Monthly Review Press, 1975.
21). Regis Debray, “The Chilean Revolution: Conversations with
Allende,” Pantheon, 1972; Paul M. Sweezy, “Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Chile,” Monthly Review Press, 1974.
22). Tim Weiner, “How the CIA Took Aim at Allende,” New York
Times, 9/12/1998; Paul M. Sweezy, “Revolution and Counter-Revolution
in Chile,” Monthly Review Press, 1974.
23). Miguel Gonzalez Pino, et al., “Los mil dias de Allende II,,”
Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Pœblicos, 1997.
24). Gonzalez Pino, “Allende concita atenci—n de la prensa mundial,”
La Tarde, 9/7/1970.
25). “CIA plot against Allende: Operating guidance cable,” 10/16/
1970. “CIA, Operating Guidance Cable on Coup Plotting, October 16, 1970.”
In this cable, Thomas Karamessines, CIA deputy director, conveys
Kissinger’s orders to Henry Hecksher, CIA station chief in Santiago, and
includes the following statements: “It is firm and continuing policy that
Allende be overthrown by a coup.” The “operating guidance” is to hide the
“American hand.” The CIA is instructed to ignore any orders which are not
consistent with this guidance cable. “CIA, Memorandum of Conversation
of Meeting with Henry Kissinger, Thomas Karamessines, and Alexander
Haig, October 15, 1970.” This Memorandum includes a discussion of covert plans promoting a coup in Chile, and the overthrow of Allende, known
as “Track II.” Kissinger orders the CIA to “continue keeping the pressure
on every Allende weak spot in sight.”
26). Robinson Rojas Sandford, “The Murder of Allende and the End
of the Chilean Way of Socialism,” Harper & Row, 1976; Paul M. Sweezy,
“Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Chile,” Monthly Review Press, 1974.
27). Department of State, “Chilean Executions,” Memo, 11/16/1973;
Tim Weiner, “How the CIA Took Aim at Allende,” New York Times, 9/12/
1998; Thomas Hauser, Missing: The Execution of Charles Horman,” Simon
164

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

& Schuster, 1983; Thomas C. Wright & Rody Onate, eds., Flight from
Chile : Voices of Exile,” University of New Mexico Press, 1998; FBI Report to Chilean Military on Detainee, 6/6/1975.
28). Department of State, “Kubisch-Huerta Meeting: Request for
Specific Replies to Previous Questions on Horman and Teruggi Cases,” 2/
11/1974; “FBI Report to Chilean Military on Detainee,” 6/6/1975 - This
1975 document , sent by FBI attache Robert Scherrer to Chilean General
Ernesto Baeza, records U.S. collaboration with Chile’s security forces.
The CIA promises to provide surveillance of Chilean citizens and other
sympathizers inside the United States. This document also describes “Operation Condor.” Condor was actually a network of secret police agencies
in Argentina, Paraguay, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Chile, who were coordinated by the CIA for the purposes of tracking, capturing, torturing, and
killing dissidents, including those inside the United States, and including
the citizens of other countries. “FBI, Operation Condor Cable,” 9/28/1976
- This cable was written also written Robert Scherrer, the FBI’s attache in
Buenos Aires. This cable summarizes intelligence information and details
Operation Condor, the joint intelligence operation designed to “eliminate
Marxist terrorist activities in the area.” The cable goes on to provide information about “special teams” which travel “anywhere in the world... to
carry out assassination against terrorists or supporters of terrorist organizations.”
29). John Dean, “Blind Ambition: The White House Years,” Simon
& Schuster, 1976; Elizabeth Drew, “Washington Journal: The Events of
1973-1974,” Macmillan, 1984; Carl Bernstein & Bob Woodward, “All the
President’s Men,” Simon & Schuster, 1974; Theodore H. White, “Breach
of Faith: The Fall of Richard Nixon,” Atheneum-Reader’s Digest, 1975.
30). Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin, “George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography,” The Executive Intelligence Review.
31). Carl Bernstein & Bob Woodward, “All the President’s Men,”
Simon & Schuster, 1974.
32). James A. Bill, “The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations.” Yale University Press, 1988.
33). Rockefeller, and his clone, Henry Kissinger, also played a role
in the downfall of the Shah, in 1978 and the subsequent Iranian hostage
crises which resulted. The Shah was a hated, brutal, dictators, and it was the
job of his secret police, SAVAK, to keep the rabble terrorized and under
control. But it was precisely because of his despotic rule that the Iranian
people increasingly rebelled, and then welcomed the return of Iran’s spiritual leader, the Ayatollah Khomeni. As more and more riots broke out, the
Rockefeller and the Rockefeller owned, Chase Manhattan bank (which had
loaned the Shah incredible sums of money, pressured the CIA which pres165

America Betrayed

sured SAVAK to employ increasingly horrific measures which finally trigged
the Iranian revolution. The synthesis of this Hegelian dialectic was that
Rockefeller and Chase Manhattan Bank came out ahead of the game and
with more money that if the Shah had stayed in power. As detailed by James
Brill (23), after the revolution, private policy makers such as Kissinger and
Rockefeller managed one last scam. Chase Manhattan Bank appealed to
the U.S. government and the courts, claiming that the new Iranian government might withdraw their funds from the bank and repudiate the shah’s
loans. Rockefeller/Chase was demanding that it be awarded all Iranian
assets, which was far and beyond what was owed. The new Iranian government pledged to repay those loans. The new Iranian government, however,
also demanded the return of property and funds stolen by the Shah, and that
the Shah—who was in exile in another country, be returned to Iran. Kissinger
and Rockefeller figured they had nothing to lose and everything to gain if
they could provoke a crisis. They began lobbying Washington for the admission of the Shah into the U.S. and their wishes were granted. This resulted in the Iranian takeover of the U.S. embassy, the hostage crisis, the
freezing of Iranian assets, and a declaration of default by Chase which allowed Chase to seize Iranian assets to offset the loans. In the end, the Iranian-hostage the crisis clearly benefited the American banking community.”
34). Stephen Shlesinger & Stephen Kinzer, “Bitter Fruit: the Untold
Story of the American Coup in Guatemala,” Anchor Press, 1990.
35). Stacy May & Galo Plaza, “The United Fruit Company in Latin
America,” Washington, National Planning Association, 1957; Alejandra
Batres, “The Experience of the Guatemalan United Fruit Company Workers, 1944-1954: Why Did They Fail?” Texas Papers on Latin America, Paper No. 95-01, University of Texas at Austin, 1995; Paul Dosal, “Doing
Business with the Dictators : a Political History of United Fruit in Guatemala, 1899-1944,” SR Books, 1993; Thomas, McCann, “An American
Company: the Tragedy of United Fruit,” Crown, 1976. CIA operative, E.
Howard Hunt, who played a major role in the overthrow of Jacobo Arbenz
in Guatemala, later told that “I felt a little bit betrayed when I learned
that... the reason [for the overthrow] was because Thomas Corcoran, the
famous lobbyist working for the United Fruit Company, had persuaded
Eisenhower and some other high dignitaries to do something about it. I
thought, ‘Hey, you know, I’m working for the United States of America,
I’m not a hireling for United Fruit.’ “
36). Jay Mallin, “Fulgencio Batista: Ousted Cuban Dictator,” Story
House Corp, 1974; Marifeli Perez-Stable, “The Cuban Revolution: Origins, Course, and Legacy,” Oxford University Press, 1998.
37). Ernesto Che Guevara, “Episodes of the Cuban Revolutionary
166

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

War 1956-58,” Pathfinder Press, 1996. Julia E. Sweig, “Inside the Cuban
Revolution: Fidel Castro and the Urban Underground,” Harvard Univ Press,
2002.
38). Syrokomsky, Vitaly, “International Terrorism and the CIA: Documents, Eyewitness Reports, Facts,” Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1983.
39). Peter Kornbluh (Editor), “Bay of Pigs Declassified: The Secret
CIA Report on the Invasion of Cuba, National Security Archive Documents
Reader,” New Press, 1998; James G. Blight & Peter Kornbluh (Editors),
“Politics of Illusion: The Bay of Pigs Invasion Reexamined,” Lynne Rienner
Publishers, 1998.
40). Marifeli Perez-Stable, “The Cuban Revolution: Origins, Course,
and Legacy,” Oxford University Press, 1998.
41). Donald Freed, “Death in Washington,” Westport Press, 1980.
42. The “Stab in the Back” was a term used by Hitler and the Nazis to
explain Germany’s surrender in WWI. Hitler blamed communists and the
new democratic leadership which had assumed power in Germany.
43). E. Howard Hunt, “Give Us This Day,” New Rochelle: Arlington
House, 1973.
44). Graham T. Allison, Philip Zelikow, “Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis;” Michael R. Beschloss, The Crisis Years:
Kennedy and Khrushchev, 1960-63,” Edward Burlingame Books, 1991.
45). John Bartlow Martin, “Third Oral History Interview with Robert
F. Kennedy,” 4/30/64. John F. Kennedy Library; John M. Newman, “JFK
and Vietnam: Deception, Intrigue, And The Struggle For Power.”
46). Arnold, James R. “The First Domino: Eisenhower, the Military
and America’s Intervention in Vietnam,” Morrow, 1991.
47). Archimedes Patti, “Why Viet Nam? Prelude to America’s Albatross. Berkeley,” University of California Press, 1980; Surveillant, “A chronological account — from 1945 to 1962 — of the decisions that led to
America’s military commitment in Vietnam.”
48). Anderson, David L. “J. Lawton Collins, John Foster Dulles, and
the Eisenhower Administration’s Point of No Return in Vietnam.” Diplomatic History, 12, 127-147, 1988.
49). Gibbons, William C. “The U.S. Government and the Vietnam
War: Executive and Legislative Roles and Relationships,” Princeton University Press, 1986-1989.
50). Morrow, Robert D. “Betrayal,” Henry Regnery Company, 1976;
Warren Hinckle & William Turner, “Deadly Secrets: The CIA-Mafia War
Against Castro and the Assassination of J.F.K.” Thunder’s Mouth, 1992;
Robert Groden & Harrison Livingstone. “High Treason: The Assassination
of John F. Kennedy and the New Evidence of Conspiracy,” Berkley Books,
1989.
167

America Betrayed

51). Mark Lane, “Plausible Denial, “Thunder’s Mouth, 1991; Mark
North, “Act of Treason: The Role of J. Edgar Hoover in the Assassination
of President Kennedy,” Carroll & Graf, 1991; C. Robert Blakey & Richard
N. Billings, “The Plot to Kill the President,” Times Books, 1981; Robert
Sam Anson, “They’ve Killed The President!” Bantam, 1975.
52). “Report of the Warren Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy,” Bantam, 1964.
53). Madeleine Brown, “Texas In The Morning.”
54). Robert Grogen, “The Killing of a President: The Complete Photographic Record of the JFK Assassination, the Conspiracy, and the Coverup. New York: Viking Studio Books, 1994; Robert Grogen, The Search for
Lee Harvey Oswald: The Complete Photographic Record,” Penguin Studio, 1995.
55) Several independent experts, including Vincent Salandria, Professor Josiah Thompson and Ray Marcus, have argued that the “third” shot,
which struck Kennedy in the head, was actually two nearly simultaneous
shots, one coming from the right front (the grassy knoll) and the other from
the rear. In large part this argument is based on Vincent Salandria’s “Head
Movement Theory” (Esquire, 12/1966) i.e. that the sudden and different
movements of Kennedy’s head—which are apparent when a frame by frame
analysis of the Zapruder film of the assassination— are due to two almost
simultaneous bullets striking his head. Thus the third shot was really a third
and fourth shot. This explanation is also consistent with the large number
of witnesses who heard seven or eight shots. A close analysis of the Zapruder
film which captured the entire assassination, shows Kennedy reaching up
toward his throat, and then we see an explosion of red mushrooming from
the right which is then followed, almost immediately, by the explosion of
the back of Kennedy’s head as his skull and portions of his brain are splashed
onto the back of his limousine. We also see his head being thrown back—
which is consistent with Newton’s second law of motion—i.e. that an object struck by a projectile will be driven in the same direction as that of the
projectile. Likewise, it is clear from the Zapruder film that the bullet struck
the right temporal region of his head. It is also evident from autopsy photos
that the right temporal injury is rather small, whereas the left parietal injury
is massive. It would thus be expected that his left parietal skull and brain
would be ejected, as entry wounds are almost always smaller than exit
wounds which tends to blow outward. As the book depository was behind
Kennedy, it is thus rather apparent that a right frontal entry was not caused
by a bullet fired from behind.
56). Orville Nix, a UPI photographer, was standing opposite the
grassy knoll taking pictures. An analysis of the Nix film showed what looked
to be a car with a man standing on it holding what appeared to be a rifle that
168

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

appeared to be pointed in the direction of Kennedy’s car. Maurice Schonfeld,
Jack Fox, and Burt Reinhardt, all of U.P.I. also believe the photograph shows
a man pointing a rifle. UPI reporter, Jack Fox subsequently interviewed
several witnesses to the assassination. S. M. Holland, who was standing on
the overpass, told Fox there were four shots: “…the first came from the
book building and hit the President. The second came from the same place
and hit Governor John Connally….The third shot came from behind the
picket fence to the north of Elm Street. There was a puff of smoke under the
trees like someone had thrown out a Chinese firecracker and a report entirely different from the one which was fired from the book building.” Seven
other witnesses on the overpass also saw a puff of smoke rising. J. M. Smith,
a Dallas policeman, claimed to have “caught the smell of gunpowder” behind the wooden fence. Holland also claimed he ran toward the fence and
saw a station wagon with two muddy marks on the bumper “as if someone
had stood there to look over the fence.”
57). The “magic bullet,” according to the Warren Commission, entered Kennedy’s back, turned upward and exited his neck, then it struck
Connally in the back, turned right and struck Connally in the wrist, and
then turned left and entered Connally’s thigh, and then, it fell out on
Connally’s stretcher in the Dallas hospital where he had been taken. Others, such as Mark Lane, Vincent Salandria, Ray Marcus, Léo Sauvage,
Harold Weisberg, and Professors Richard H. Popkin and Josiah Thompson, propose a more logical explanation for the “magic bullet.” The bullet
was fired from Oswald’s rifle before the assassination and then it was left
on the Connally’s stretcher, where it was found later that day. Also, three
doctors, Finck, Humes, and Shaw testified that bullet fragments were found
in Connally’s wrist whereas the bullet found on the stretcher only had a
slight dent, as if it had been shot into something soft, like a pillow.
58). Theodore H. White’s The Making of the President, 1964. “On
the flight [back to Washington aboard Air Force One] the party learned that
there was no conspiracy; learned of the identity of Oswald and his arrest.”
Air Force landed in Washington at 4:58 p.m. Dallas time. According to
Dallas District Attorney Henry M. Wade he had received a number of telephone calls from the FBI, the State Department and White House, that
afternoon, and the calls continued into the evening.
59). John McCloy served as a Member of Committee on the National Security Organization from 1948 to 1949. Because of his extensive
business connections with Germany prior to and during the war (serving
Rockefeller-Nazi interests), he served, at the urgings of Rockefeller and the
Dulles brothers, as US Military Governor and High Commissioner for Germany from 1949 until 1952. In 1953 until 1960, he served as Chairman of
the Board, Chase National Bank and then, after it merged with another
169

America Betrayed

bank, the Chase Manhattan Bank. During the war, IG Farben owned 40%
of Chase stock, whereas Rockefeller owned much of the rest.
60. Newsweek 12/1/98. Daily News 12/21/98: “Chase National Bank
- the precursor of today’s Chase Manhattan Bank, helped the Nazis to plunder Jewish property in France during World War II. The New York-based
bank controlled by the Rockefeller family closed Jewish accounts even before the Germans ordered them to do so and did business with the Nazis
while they were sending Jews to the gas chambers. And while the U.S. was
at war with the Nazis, Chase also helped German banks do business with
their overseas branches. Chase Manhattan is now the largest bank company
in the U.S. with more than $300 billion in assets. Lawyers representing
Holocaust survivors” named “Chase Manhattan in their lawsuit” and “another big U.S. bank, J.P. Morgan. While many other U.S. businesses and
banks closed down their Paris operations after France fell to the Germans,
Chase National remained open and even thrived. The relationship between
Chase and the Nazis apparently was so cozy that Carlos Niedermann, the
Chase branch chief in Paris, wrote his supervisor in Manhattan that the
bank enjoyed ‘very special esteem’ with top German officials and ‘a rapid
expansion of deposits.’ Niedermann’s letter was written in May 1942 - five
months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and the U.S. also went to
war with Germany.”
61). Daily News, 12/24/98, “Chase Named In Holocaust-Asset Suit.
Two American banks were named in a class-action lawsuit yesterday that
accuses them of collaborating with the Nazis to deprive Jewish depositors
of their rightful assets. ‘They froze and blocked Jewish accounts during the
period of the Nazi occupation in France, depriving Jewish families of the
financial means to flee France,’ said attorney Kenneth McCallion, who filed
the suit against Chase Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan and seven French banks.
McCallion charges Chase’s Paris branch - with full backing of its New
York office - displayed “excessive zeal” in enforcing anti-Jewish laws and
was held in “very special esteem” by Vichy authorities. Court papers also
say Chase prospered under German occupation, nearly doubling its deposits between 1942 and 1944 from 27 million to more than 50 million French
francs. Chase officials said in a statement that it has been in settlement talks
with the World Jewish Congress for several weeks and that it was disappointed that an ‘unnecessary” lawsuit has been filed.”
62. NMT, IG. Farben case, Volumes VII and VIII, pp. 1304-1311;
“Elimination of German Resources, p. 1085.”
63). The CIA have a huge network of contract killers that can be
called upon from any country, and imported into any country, for the purposes of terrorism and murder, including the murder of politicians and presidents. For example, as revealed in a cable written FBI attache Robert
170

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

Scherrer, “FBI, Operation Condor Cable,” 9/28/1976, the CIA maintains a
joint intelligence operation involving a network of secret police agencies
and “special teams” which travel “anywhere in the world... to carry out
assassination against terrorists or supporters of terrorist organizations,” including individuals or organizations inside the United States.
64). CIA contract agent and electronics expert, Robert D. Morrow,
in his book, First Hand Knowledge—How I participated in the CIA-Mafia
Murder of President Kennedy, claims that in July of 1963, Tracy Barnes,
CIA head of Domestic Operations ordered him to procure “four Mannlicher
7.35 mm surplus rifles. I received a second phone call. It was del Valle
calling from, I assumed, Miami. He asked me to supply him with four transceivers which were not detectable by any communications equipment then
available on the market. I told him that I could provide him with sub-miniaturized units whose operation would be confined to a range of fifty or one
hundred kilohertz. To operate any sizable distance, the units would require
an antenna at least several feet in length. A wire taped to the user’s leg
would easily suffice for this purpose. Del Valle then requested that I deliver
the transceivers and the rifles to David Ferrie. Del Valle explained to me
that the rifles and communications equipment were for his Free Cuba Committee, and that Clay and Ferrie were assisting him in the operation. Then
he dropped the bomb. Del Valle exclaimed, “They had better be perfect,
compadre. They are for Texas! ...Kennedy is going to get it in Dallas!”
65). Jim Oliphant. Legal Times, 6/21/2000
66). Robert Groden & Harrison Livingstone. “High Treason: The
Assassination of John F. Kennedy and the New Evidence of Conspiracy,”
Berkley Books, 1989; Mark North, “Act of Treason: The Role of J. Edgar
Hoover in the Assassination of President Kennedy,” Carroll & Graf, 1991.
67). Edward Jay Epstein, “Legend: The Secret World of Lee Harvey
Oswald,” Hutchinson, 1978.
68). Richard H. Immerman, “John Foster Dulles: Piety, Pragmatism,
and Power in U.S. Foreign Policy,” Scholarly Resources, 1999; Richard H.
Immerman (Editor), “John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold
War,” Princeton University Press, 1992.
69). Tom Wicker & Arthur M. Schlesinger, “Dwight D. Eisenhower
1953-1961,” Times Books, 2000; Robert R. Bowie & Richard H. Immerman,
“Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy,” Oxford University Press, 2000.
70). Fred J. Cook, “The U-2 Incident, May, 1960: An American Spy
Plane Downed over Russia Intensifies the Cold War,” Franklin Watts, 1973.
71). John M. Newman, “Oswald and the CIA,” 1995.
72). Haldeman, “The Ends of Power”,
73). Joseph McBride, “‘George Bush,’ CIA Operative,” The Nation,
171

America Betrayed

July 16, 1988.
74). Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein, “The Final Days,” Avon Books.
75). Victor Marchetti, The Spotlight, Liberty Lobby, 8/14/1978.
76). CNN, “Howard Hunt: CIA Operative, Central America,” 9/1997
& 10/1997.
77). “Operation Zapata.” See page 89, Michael R. Beschloss, The
Crisis Years: Kennedy and Khrushchev, 1960-63,” Edward Burlingame
Books, 1991.
78). “Houston” and “Barbara” were the names of two of the ships
used in the Bay of Pigs. See pages 79-80, Quintin Pino Machado, “La Batalla
de Giron,” La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales, 1983; and see pages
98-99, “Schumacher, Operation Pluto,” and Peter Wyden, “Bay of Pigs,
The Untold Story,” Simon and Shuster, 1979.
79). “Date: November 29, 1963 To: Director Bureau of Intelligence
and Research Department of State From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
Subject: ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY NOVEMBER 22, 1963 Our Miami, Florida, Office on November 23, 1963
advised that the Office of Coordinator of Cuban Affairs in Miami advised
that the Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might
capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against
Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy might
herald a change in US policy, which is not true. Our sources and informants
familiar with Cuban matters in the Miami area advise that the general feeling in the anti-Castro Cuban community is one of stunned disbelief and,
even among those who did not entirely agree with the President’s policy
concerning Cuba, the feeling is that the President’s death represents a great
loss not only to the US but to all Latin America. These sources know of no
plans for unauthorized action against Cuba. An informant who has furnished reliable information in the past and who is close to a small proCastro group in Miami has advised that those individuals are afraid that the
assassination of the President may result in strong repressive measures being taken against them and, although pro-Castro in their feelings, regret the
assassination. The substance of the foregoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain
William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency on November 23,
1963, by Mr. W.T. Forsyth of this Bureau.”
80). “Report to the President by the Commission on CIA Activities
Within the United States,” Washington: US Government Printing Office,
1975, pp. 251-267.
81). Georgie Anne Geyer, “Guerrilla Prince,” Little, Brown, 1991.

172

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close