BC Attorney General Michael de Jong Reg. Mail July 13 2009

Published on May 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 120 | Comments: 0 | Views: 441
of 151
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

July 13 2009 Michael de Jong Attorney General ± British Columbia Ministry of Attorney General British Columbia PO Box 9044 STN Prov Govt Victoria, BC [email protected]

You only have your miserable life to lose

Re: Dawson Creek Dolores Smith Court File # 28306-2-C RCMP File # nu08-2963 CDF1 File # 1 Honourable Mike de Jong
Mike de Jong was re-elected as MLA for the new riding of Abbotsford West on May 12, 2009. He was first elected to the Legislative Assembly in a 1994 by-election to represent the electoral district of Matsqui. He was re-elected in 1996 and again in 2001 to the new riding of Abbotsford-Mount Lehman, where he was again re-elected in 2005. Minister de Jong previously served as Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation since Aug. 15, 2006. He has also served as Government House Leader. Minister de Jong has previously served as Minister of Labour and Citizens¶ Services and Minister of Forests. Prior to that, he was deputy house leader for the Official Opposition and served as a critic for a variety of portfolios. Before his election, Minister de Jong practiced as a lawyer in his Abbotsford firm. He holds a bachelor of arts degree from Carleton University in Ottawa and a law degree from the University of Alberta.

Honourable Mike de Jong
Ministry of Attorney General

Dear Michael de Jong

1

For the record I e-mailed Wally Oppal and others on the GLIST http://www.scribd.com/doc/15678663/GLIST-Single-Row May 8 2009 now published as http://www.scribd.com/doc/15092821/The-People-Make-aStand-in-Dawson-Creek-May-11-2009 to inform of the serious problems in Dawson Creek These documents accompany the present 150 published on my Scribd http://www.scribd.com/my_docs that irrefutably prove government organized crime This is well documented by the Charter Democracy Force www.charterdemocracyforce.ca that clearly shows corruption and conspiracy expands world wide. On the morning of May 11 2009 I e-mailed him to inform of the injustice going down in Dawson Creek requesting he forward an attached letter to Legal Aid Lawyer Keith Jones who was provided by the Legal Aid system to defend Dolores Smith not aid in the RCMP cover-up of the murders of her friends Natasha Dostal and Clayton Desjarlais http://www.scribd.com/doc/15278656/Utmost-Importance-May-12-2009 On May 26 2009 I informed Harper requesting him to deal with the issues consistent with the Constitution, however not expecting him to do so as it is impossible without exposing himself and the entire government organized crime. http://www.scribd.com/doc/15874797/CDF-Asks-Harper-ASSHOLE-or-STUPID-ASSRegistered-Mail The www.charterdemocracyforce.CC web site provides links indicating very serious problems in Canada indicative of the deliberate incompetence of the legal system. There are reports that British Columbia is becoming the equivalent to Swiss banks laundering drug money into real estate How could these things happen under a competent legal system? How can the people of Dawson Creek be under siege by the Hells Angels and RCMP covering up murders with the drug trade in full swing? Relative document http://www.scribd.com/doc/16769615/Government-Organized-Crime-TakeDown-by-LegalMeans The government participates in racism http://www.scribd.com/doc/16689884/We-Are-the-People-We-Are-CDF1CA

Attention BC Attorney General Michael de Jong There are serious injustices going down in Dawson Creek just symptoms of the realities that exist under the leadership of the government organized crime that is not permitted to exist under the Constitution: Document and obviously would not exist if the Constitution: Establishment was competent responsible and irreproachable with exemplary fortitude and conviction demanded of them financed to administer and enforce the laws to that reality. 2

There is no lack of evidence as every move they make is and must be consistent to the conspiracy for its continued success that made it so easy to document and publish on my www.charterdemocracyforce.ca web sites with commentary to explain the significance of the evidence to the people who are brainwashed from birth to adapt to the reality that is. It is only when one begins to wonder why reality is how it is instead of that which would be conducive to humanism do we begin to realize that they who profess to be ³Learned and Honourable´ are no brighter than a toad and yet they make out like bandits. With further observation we see they simply are bandits of a higher intelligence, smart enough to know better and cannot possibly convince us that they are ignorant of what they do, not at all what Jesus suggested when their ilk nailed him to a cross. Given the tendency to BULLSHIT and the fact the bible wasn¶t written until approximately 265 years later by the nefarious bent ancestry of them who killed him for daring to intervene upon the luxurious lifestyle of the scum of the earth who had every opportunity to benefit humankind but chose to be a cancer upon society. No different today as reality attests and the Charter Democracy Force has simply extracted some excerpts from it to demonstrate their façade as humans while being precisely indifferent to humanism bent on satiating their insatiable lust for wealth and power. I have made much commentary on the evil aspirations of such people and well documented their indifference to the Constitution even though they before them enacted it but obviously for fraudulent purpose and when the people come to realize just what they have been up to there will be a call for heads to role, guaranteed « because I of sane mind see no other viable alternative to ensure that such evil never pops its ugly head again upon a guaranteed moral society of equally protected and benefitted individual¶s that demands consistent due punishment in support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights that simply is humanism. http://www.scribd.com/my_docs It is due the realities of humankind that the mind can lead a person anywhere that there simply must be ground rules and they have been published as the Constitution Act, 1982 founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law. It is the simplicity and sanity of it relative to humankind that we can identify people of your ilk as ASSHOLES given the trust and wherewithal provided you to administer and enforce it and given your education you simply cannot bow out of the due punishment soon to befall you consistent with the Constitution in support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. It is due your position with the legal system that I inform you of the many serious issues of inconsistencies with the Constitution and the irrefutable evidence of government organized crime that has now been provided to the appropriate authorities by registered mail that they can not duck the issues with their trained charlatan ways of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration any longer once thoroughly documented.

3

In other ways the success you all enjoyed due your adeptness to the persuasion once documented must collapse and God damn it « it most certainly will. However, should you demonstrate due diligence to the Constitution and every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit immediately upon coherence to the serious issues of the irrefutable evidence you will be deemed to be the sane competent responsible and irreproachable person demanded of the Constitution: Document to make ³The Sprit of the Law´ real. You will without hesitation call for an immediate PUBLIC INQUIRY into the injustice of the trial of Dolores Smith up on trumped up charges by the RCMP that incurred since the RCMP covered up the murders of her friends Natasha Dostal and Clayton Desjarlais. Dolores and Barb Dostal can provide you witnesses to the murders and prove Harper is linked to the drug trade and the Hells Angels. The towns people cower in fear, an absurdity with so much money spent to protect every individual as guaranteed and you must immediately publish that new evidence has come to your attention of the deaths of Natasha and Clayton and a full scale investigation is warranted along with a PUBLIC INQUIRY due the serious issues now presented in support of Dolores Smith. Failure to act appropriately consistent with your responsibility as ³guardian of the public interest´ will most certainly find you up on the most serious charges consistent with the trust placed upon you by the people. The game is over and denial will kick you in the ass in the most serious way. I remind you in the legal system there can be no political interference and you are simply put on the spot due your position as chief legal advisor and I humongously advise that you advise yourself to do the right thing consistent with the Constitution and avoid the certain consequences of refusal. You have only you to protect your ass and you can be assured we are coming for it. This document is published as ³BC Attorney General Michael de Jong Reg. Mail July 13. 09´ Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force Cc GLIST

Find attached registered mail receipt.

4

So Michael de Jong By registered mail you have been informed of that which you are well aware of and prevents you from suggesting to anyone that you were not aware of the government organization crime that could not happen without your cooperation and anyone else of illegitimate authority with the government organized crime, being too obvious to them involved in the system. Soon we will know the validity and sincerity of Governor General Michael Jean purported to be the ³Commander-in Chief´ of the Canadian Forces. Soon we will know what the Canadian Forces stand for. Are they mercenaries? Are they in on the conspiracy? Are they people just like us that have been fooled by the illegitimate political, legal profession, corporate world amalgamated conspiracy against the people and society as a whole. They are thieves obstructing the people of their ultimate potential and thrive off the symptoms thereby justifying their need. Would we have needs without them?

5

We know the Church won¶t help http://www.scribd.com/doc/14139073/Archbishop-Apr-10-09 Make Poverty History will not help http://www.scribd.com/doc/14135236/Make-Poverty-History

We know the people on this site will not help
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition

Anymore help from these people and we will all be dead

6

The Constitution: Document abrogates the illegitimate Establishment

No cuss when you eradicate the ornery cusses http://search.conduit.com/ResultsExt.aspx?ctid=CT2306581&SearchSource=2&q=Mulro ney http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force Mulroney confiscated RCMP from the people 2000 Zack the RCMP Commissioner at the time was reported to be no ³Patsy´ he was aware of the organized crime taking over the government and now he is gone The fact is the government have always been organized crime as history and cyber space will attest The people of the Upper Tier obviously cooperate in their best interests that includes the charities, churches, do-gooders like Transparency International and Democracy Watch who all make a comfortable living watching with the legal profession major players having structured the system to advance their personal interests who have infested the political, legal and corporate world and of course invested and provide themselves all the tax breaks « government handouts and well aware of what directions the governments are headed long before the public they are able to manipulate their personal portfolios and markets as they did to the present financial crisis with the banks in on it and they simply put the money in numbered accounts as they put the people in debt to cover their asses. Their illegitimate laws inconsistent with the Constitution in Canada which they do not give a damn about or the people because they simply are crooks charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration. Mulroney of the Mulroney/Schreiber scandal is just an example and is a sitting target for the people to come to their senses and demand his head « that will get the heads rolling as we have Harper¶s ass trapped in Dawson Creek where come September when Dolores Smith goes to court to be falsely sentenced whatever move he makes will cause his collapse along with entire government organized crime. www.cdf1.ca Since all governments and legal profession are in on it along with the media corporate monopolies such as the convicted Conrad Black they would have us believe this is all legal and difficult to punish the Prime Ministers for political reasons however the Minister of Justice and Attorney General is required to administer and enforce the Constitution without interference from anyone especially they of the political and corporate world because it is prerequisite that he be unbiased and certainly nobody has the right to obstruct justice. However the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ states that although he or his agents, Crown Attorney¶s can advise the police ultimately it is up to the police to make the charges then he can obstruct justice from there as it his decision whether or not to proceed and in which manner. 7

This is inconsistent with Common Sense and the Constitution and therefore of no force or effect. The R&R of the Attorney General is humongously infested with inconsistencies and deliberate illegitimacies with the rule of law and suggests that other departments that he advises has other interests than being of exemplary consistent with every individuals equal guaranteed Charter rights. The evidence clearly shows they never intended to protect every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights « as the Law Society propagates criminals « charlatans of deception. Prevarication, manipulation and orchestration where the Constitution: Document itself is the only authority they have to administer laws and enforce and their entire modus operandi is 180 degrees adverse to the Constitution being irrefutable evidence against them and they subject to due punishment which of course they believe their shit doesn¶t stink because who is their to bring them to trial and if you did they would get off like Martin, Chretien and Mulroney after billions of tax money is sucked into their coffers.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

They are humongous bull-shitters as they have to be to maintain their success and keep out of jail being no challenge with the people of the Upper Tier cooperating being why they are the Upper Tier and the people of the Lower Tier simply do not have a God damn clue of what is going on. They never have and yet they will sing O¶ Canada and all the other hype of loyalty as they even enlist in the Armed Forces to fight for these scums of the earth killing people in other countries who attempt to stand up against their ilk « the same type that killed Jesus. The people are brainwashed from birth and the insanity goes on until they take the time to understand what the hell is going on. The people of the Lower Tier are being ransacked in every which way possible by the people of the Upper Tier being how they got their and maintain their comfortable lifestyle while humongous starvation and poverty persists. People always have to wait to hear the bull-shit on the news to have an inkling of what is going on but they will never hear the truth as to root of the problem even though it is extraordinarily obvious. The people are so pathetically passive and therefore ignorant in these matters and disorganized that allows them to do it believing we have all these agencies looking after the issues that makes it so simple for the crooks minding the store to run off with it. How obvious when they investigate themselves « but who else is going to do it with the people¶s heads in the sand wondering where all the money goes.

8

There is plenty of evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web sites to collapse the conspiracy in Canada thus beginning the end of the ³Struggle of Humankind´ for their success is dependent on deceiving the people and obstructing the truth from getting to them. Agencies like the Ontario Ombudsman are set up and promoted to be independent of the government and they claim they cannot intervene « but the Attorney General administers their mandates and advises them all and thus they have limited authority not at all what the government publish them to be. The Law Society of Upper Canada, which the Attorney General has precedence and also advises all government departments, agencies and police, propagate persons to hold every position of authority throughout the legal system and have admitted that they are of the absurd belief that their members are not required to give a damn about every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant when it is against their members. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273017/law-society-february-10-2007 They even demonstrated that belief in dealing with their member that I complained about. http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition September 3 3008 The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition (See pages 97 & 98) On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP for refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy which they immediately submitted to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate themselves who happens to be a major player in the conspiracy as I knew but had to have the evidence even though they believe it is irrelevant because they are of the foolish arrogant belief that I will not get it to the people. RCMP Superintendant Robert Davis demonstrates the Law Society ideology that evidence is irrelevant when it is against them while clearly demonstrating their skills of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration after RMP Staff SGT R.B MacAdam studied the evidence for 8 months, being delayed for a couple of weeks or so as he informed me that he got a promotion and went on holiday, The Final Report informs that RCMP Inspector Verheule who had refused to investigate was now retired as the RCMP Superintendent clearly states he ignored the hundreds of pages of evidence of government organized crime to slip through the back door on a diversionary tactic which was completely false in itself to find the RCMP innocent of refusing to investigate the obvious government organized crime. They do not have to be very smart when the entire system is designed to protect them with the media on their side as they have demonstrated by admitting they refused to look at the evidence while finding them selves innocent of refusing to investigate the evidence of government organized crime The Chair of the Reviews Commission Paul Kennedy agreed with the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition as I knew he would and now they are all wrapped up and packaged for the people to have their heads. 9

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9838279/Stockwell-Day-November-3-and-5-2007

Parliament Prime Minister Stephen Harper Minister of Justice «. advises all Ministers Robert Nicholson Formerly Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety My MPP Peter Van Loan Formerly Stockwell Day Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP Reviews Chair Paul Kennedy

RCMP Minister of Public Safety My MPP Peter Van Loan Formerly Stockwell Day Deputy Minister/ Commissioner William Elliot

We

are

Innocent

Innocent of what? That is the question

10

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless use"

thanks to ideological abuse

and general over-

publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Their ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´
Defines ³that most elusive-rule of law-well established legal principle, but hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole

Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles 1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles: 1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve. 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

11

British Columbia history professor Jonathan Swainger writes Edmund Morgan¶s compelling book ³Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America´ opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the the acceptance of a number of fictions. In a democracy, for example, it is necessary for the population to ³believe that the people have a voice or«that the representatives of the people are the people.´

Edmund Morgan¶s The Mafia Hand Book That would require the people to have minds dwarfed by toads

Their scam is over though a fine long run it was, but now to the hanging
³Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself´ ³Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness´ http://www.scribd.com/doc/9858330/Know-the-Law Why wouldn¶t they say they are innocent? Why wouldn¶t they say they cannot be punished? Why have we believed them? Because in their illegitimate system they always find themselves innocent because they set the vital evidence aside and direct us through a maze of excrement that we are forced to eat and simply do not need to dig deep or have the desire for we attempt to keep our heads above it while they rob us blind and some to death. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

12

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Due punishment with exemplary attentiveness to deterrence is the only viable means to protect every individual as guaranteed and there can be no discrimination as to protection or punishment and section 32, (1) makes it clear that the government ASSHOLES are subject to the ultimate punishment. Then Common Sense will prevail and justice will be had by all

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of

no force or effect.
Mulroney, Martin, Chretien, all brought before the courts and all exempted from prosecution because the political and illegitimate legal system is set up that way allowing Lobbyists is fundamental to their scheme with the legal profession infesting the entire system and the corporate world where it obvious where their interests lay as they must put on the façade that they are for the people, democracy, the Constitution and the people¶s guaranteed Charter rights, but there is not a shred of evidence that they are what they would have the people believe. They are unequivocally crooks and they have now been put to the ultimate test which they are in fact trapped as we watch their scheme in action at Dawson Creek in September. Everyone has precisely the same evidence with no room for them to apply their charlatan ways of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration of their illegitimates laws packed with loopholes, ambiguity and deliberate inconsistencies with the Constitution all designed to protect the conspiracy from the people. The money that is wasted putting on their façade is astronomical and the evidence on the www.charterdemocracyforce.ca demonstrates the difficulty to bring them before the people so the reported charges against the Prime Ministers are microscopic as to the numbers that would be reported if we had a legitimate system, but then that statement is absurd in itself because if we had a legitimate system with all opportunities removed they simply wouldn¶t have the opportunity to ransack the people. It is absolutely horrific how much money they steal from the taxpayers for the legal profession to put on their façade of pursuing justice on behalf of the society guaranteed by the Constitution Charter where their simply is not a hint of that society anywhere as it is the Law Society that predominates their unscrupulous ideology absolutely 180 degrees adverse to that which they proclaim to the people with the Constitution: Document the supreme law of Canada ³Exhibit A´ and absolutely everything they do in defiance of the law thereby being the obvious criminal element that must be brought before the people¶s court scrutinized by the people. 13

It simply is not about finding evidence against them as all of reality attests. The onus is on them to produce a shred of evidence to suggest that they are anything other than organized crime designed to ransack society to the benefit of the membership and friends of the Law Society while their system is designed to protect them all at the expense of society to the people¶ humongous detriment. They are simply a personal interest group (PIG) as are we all inherently bias however it it incumbent upon them financed by all the PIG to be particularly unbiased in support of the Charter undoubtedly a most onerous and formidable challenge whereas they have simply taken the opportunities provided them in trust to vigorously advance the interests of their PIG. The Constitution either states or implies the legal system must be structured with competent responsible irreproachable personnel of exemplary fortitude and conviction to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit that demands a persistent consistency to the eradication of amoral inclination nipping it in the bud prior to it advancing to the criminal persuasion when most costly and difficult to deal with. That would direct the lucrative business away from the organized crime of the Law Society where the most urgent issues are to eradicate poverty that their ideology and thievery causes as hopelessness and despair is natural as is the progressive nature to amoral inclination on to criminal persuasion that leaves humongous victims in their wake including the taxpayer that funds the Social assistance programs and Legal Aid system where they continuously expand their industry to societies lament. In other words society¶s woes increase as does the Law Societies elation making them a cancer upon society as reality attests. Now if they were the competent responsible irreproachable persons with fortitude and conviction to the Constitution consistent with every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights they would have addressed the multitude of inconsistencies of their modus operandi well documented by the Charter Democracy Force attentive to the eradication of every inconsistency whereas I provided Prime Minister Stephen Harper the evidence prior to his becoming Prime Minister and prodigiously after. He proved they were incompetent irresponsible and reproachable with fortitude and conviction to it as they must to maintain and retain the conspiracy secure by introducing the Accountability Act, 2006 that in itself is an admittance of their incompetent irresponsible system not consistent with the Constitution. The Accountability Act, 2006 is documented irrefutable evidence of their charlatan ways of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration to suggest to the people that they never had to be competent responsible and irreproachable with exemplary fortitude and conviction to the Constitution and every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. How can you guarantee anything without due diligence to a responsible plan to the certainty? 14

So even when they go through the façade they demonstrate their unwillingness to be responsible as they always have, hyping up how responsible they are publicly and falsely representing what new Commissions are being set up for seriously limiting their mandates obviously inconsistent with the Constitution and incapable of backing the people¶s guarantee clearly demonstrating their unwillingness to put a modus operandi in place capable of their prerequisite responsibility to the Constitution and the people. They are frauds at the very least and society¶s PUBLIC ENEMY # 1 clearly documented by themselves. Then Democracy Watch that keeps a good eye on them simply looks for donations to satiate their comfortable lifestyle appearing to aggressively go after them as if they could persuade them to not be conspirators or at least appear to be more honest that simply is precisely what they have always attempted to do to deceive the people to have them believe they are trying hard to put a competent system in place and yet they have been provided the wherewithal to do it and it is demanded of them. They have the evidence to bring them to trial for punishment yet they would rather brag about it for donations. The only viable means of present knowledge to protect every individual as guaranteed is to apply due diligence to punishment attentive to deterrence of persons who will not comply with the law for they are the obvious detriment to the people¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefit. We all know Al Capone was guilty of much more than tax evasion but at least he was taken out by the charge. We all know Brian Mulroney is guilty of much more than tax evasion and that was only brought to light because Schreiber was facing charges of fraud in Germany that caused him to initiate these actions against Mulroney. He obvious fact is Mulroney¶s influence with the government as a lawyer that is well infested and invested into the corporate world and Schreiber a Lobbyists both of ulterior purpose in defiance of the Constitution and the Charter and yet when Democracy Watch challenged the legitimacy of Lobbyist they over ruled by the deliberate illegitimate system structured by the illegitimate legal profession and of course they cannot address these issues when dealing with Mulroney being the obvious proof that they have always intended to conspire with the corporate world for luxurious benefit to them all to the humongous detriment of every individual contrary to their guarantee that ultimately is to the humungous detriment of society as a whole except for the abrogated Law Society that propagates deviates that are of the ideology that they are not required to give a damn about every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and evidence against their members and evidence is irrelative when it is against their members as they not only stated but demonstrated. That is the ideology of the entire system which I have provided the irrefutable proof published on the www.charterdemocracyforce.ca web site and affiliates referenced thereon.

15

Obviously 180 degrees adverse to their legitimate mandate which of course they will inanely deny with a great dose of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration. It is precisely due their illegitimate system with the cooperation of the corporate conglomerates of the media that I have not been able to bring the evidence forward to the people and the system is designed contrary to my Charter right to access the courts.
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.

Now having got by that obstacle with Dolores Smith phoning me for help May 5 2009 against these mental giants of superfluous benefit to society precisely adverse we have now entered our evidence into their illegitimate system which of course they still cannot afford to let it get out to the people or their conspiracy will simply collapse. Of course the people will have to be watching«focussed and coherent to the issues as we watch the irrefutable proof that will be forthcoming at Dawson Creek in September when Dolores goes to court for sentencing on the trumped up charges by the RCMP that had covered up the murders of her friends Natasha Dostal and Clayton Desjarlais as accidents. Dolores was assigned a lawyer by Legal Aid who refused to introduce evidence in her support in continuance of the fix by the RCMP who I have already irrefutably proven that they subscribe to the Law Society adverse to the Constitution ideology that doesn¶t give a damn about the people¶s Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant when it is against their members and obviously they who they represent. The RCMP is a federal institution linked to Parliament, the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Minister of Public Safety my MP Peter Van Loan, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson who advises them all including Peter Van Loan who is responsible to the people and Parliament for the actions of the RCMP headed by Deputy Minister RCMP Commissioner William Elliot. They all refuse to be responsible to the people and the media cooperate with them because they are corporate conglomerates, monopolies under the likes of Conrad Black who has demonstrated his true nature. It was the nefarious bent former Prime Minister Mulroney that stole the RCMP from the people by making the RCMP Commissioner position a Deputy Minister and then Harper who assigned William Elliot to the position after being well groomed to their conspiracy and a complete outsider of the RCMP. Now they felt it is all systems go to a delightful ransacking of the people that has permitted their part in the world wide financial crisis a success of ransacking society beyond their wildest imaginations. So anyway their days are numbered as we advance upon September and the sentencing of Dolores Smith as they will collapse in their own arena under their own performance in the Dawson Creek court where they have all the advantages except for truth and the Constitution 16

and their responsibility to demonstrate due diligence of their modus operandi in support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Their responsibility to that endeavour is to duly punish persons who have reasonable evidence provided against them that suggests that they are not in compliance with the Constitution and thus not of the status of the presumption of innocence that is mandatory of every individual since the 1982 enactment of the Constitution. Invariably it is mandatory to collect and present all pertinent evidence to the courts and it is mandatory for the courts to allow it to be entered as public record with the sole object to determine the truth and where non compliance with ³The Spirit of the Law´ is concluded every effort must be made to remove any and all deficiencies in the system that are inconsistent with the Constitution and due punishment with exemplary attentiveness to deterrence being the only viable means of present knowledge to protect the people prior to being victimized and thus eradicate the flourishing propagates of the nefarious bent Law Society . This is well covered in the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ though there is no mention of the Charter and innumerable inconsistencies with the Constitution it clearly shows an overwhelming influence in the illegitimate legal system. The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid. In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet Every individual must be consistently in compliance with the Constitution therefore conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. How can his policy advice have a distinction and maintain harmony with his constitutional responsibilities as ³guardian of the public interest´ The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest". As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties. How can he consistently protect every individual as guaranteed when they define the rule of law illegitimately suggesting they are incompetent to understand the simplicity of it for deliberate ulterior purpose? Well established most certainly but quite clear. It just gets complicated when they must appear to be legitimate while unequivocally adverse. 17

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use" publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the judiciary. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights. The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) above). This is obviously an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation. The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

18

The concept of the rule of law is clear sane and understood, and clear why the administering and enforcing of the Constitution by the illegitimate nefarious bent is incomprehensible. An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available. On behalf of the people consistent with and in support of the Constitution and every individual¶s guaranteed CHARTER rights we have provided the British Columbia Attorney Michael de Jong, the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Public Safety Minister my MP Peter Van Loan, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General Robert Nicholson and the Deputy Minister RCMP Commissioner William Elliot the irrefutable evidence that holds the entire system in disrepute that seriously compromises Dolores Smith right to a fair trial. Dolores has an abundance of evidence against the RCMP as do we that they have covered up a long with the Murders of Natasha Dostal and Clayton Desjarlais and have gone on to harass, injure, kidnap and file false charges against Dolores Smith in continuance of their attempt to cover up them up. The Legal Aid lawyer assigned to Dolores has refused to enter evidence on her behalf obviously subscribing to the absurd illegitimate ideology of the Law Society that obviously is adverse to the responsibilities of the Attorney Generals as defined in the ³R & R of the AG´. With the major players having been undeniably informed it is their responsibility in the public interest to ensure the evidence is presented at court in September when Dolores goes to court and must be dealt with in appropriate manner. Of course that is beyond their capacity to do so as clearly documented they are absolutely devoid of the traits required of government and legal personnel and it would be disastrous to their conspiracy to openly present the evidence in court and deal with it appropriately that could only collapse the conspiracy. To not do so will be disastrous to their conspiracy and will collapse their conspiracy. To all of a sudden determine that Dolores is innocent and write her an apology and close the case prior to Dolores¶ court sentencing in September to prevent the evidence from getting to the people it could only cause the collapse of the conspiracy because ultimately the issues remain to be dealt with and they would only be demonstrating their charlatan ways of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration that has permitted the persistent success of their conspiracy. If Brian Mulroney does not go down for the count « obviously tax evasion the minor of his complicity with organized crime of the amalgamated political, legal profession and corporate world the entire legal and political system will collapse. 19

Invariably there is not one thing that they can do to avoid their collapse if the people are focussed on the issues. It is every person¶s responsibility that has been provided the evidence to make certain the people are focussed on the pertinent issues and are coherent to the evidence. This document will be sent to everyone on the GLIST and published on my Scribd site and referenced on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and will be sent to millions of people world wide through batch services. Truth is the only thing that can prevent the chaos that evolves due its absence. The truth will get to the people and due punishment will immediately commence consistent with the Constitution with exemplary attentiveness to deterrence in support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits prior to being victimized. It is they who structured the system with the RCMP linked to them instead of being an independent agency whereas it is unequivocally absurd to claim they are competent and responsible to the Constitution and every individual¶s Charter rights to have the accused investigate them selves. The challenge now is not to determine their irrefutably obvious guilt, but their appropriate punishment with due regard to deterrence. They have been requested to act appropriately consistent with the Constitution that is perquisite of them but due their obvious conspiracy and their vested interest to cover their asses they will deliver their ultimate performance as the curtain goes down on them there will be no encore

Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General
The Attorney General has a unique role to play as a Minister. One part of the Attorney General's role is that of a Cabinet Minister. In this capacity the Minister is responsible for representing the interests and perspectives of the Ministry at Cabinet, while simultaneously representing the interests and perspectives of Cabinet and consequently the Government to the Ministry and the Ministry's communities of interest. The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member. The role has been referred to as "judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest". Much has been written on the subject of ministerial responsibilities and the unique role of the Attorney General. There are various components of the Attorney General's role. The Attorney General has unique responsibilities to the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government. While there are different emphases and nuances attached to these there is a general theme throughout all the various aspects of the Attorney General's responsibilities that the office has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister. The statutory responsibilities of the office are found in section 5 of the Ministry of the Attorney General Act. Section 5 states: 20

The Attorney General, (a) is the Law Officer of the Executive Council; (b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law; (c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario; (d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature; (e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government; (f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government measures of a legislative nature; (g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all matters of law connected with such ministries and agency; (h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature; (i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices; (j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant Governor in Council. " What follows is an overview of the various components of the Attorney General's roles and responsibilities, primarily as outlined in the Act. Chief Law Officer of the Executive Council (s. 5(a)) The role of chief law officer might be referred to as the Attorney General's overall responsibility as the independent legal advisor to the Cabinet - and some have even suggested that the role possibly extends to the Legislature as well. The importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and well established in common law, statutes and tradition. As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties. The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid. In providing such advice it is important to keep in mind the distinction between the Attorney General's policy advice and preference and the legal advice being presented to Cabinet. The Attorney General's legal advice or constitutional advice should not be lightly disregarded. The Attorney General's policy advice has the same weight as that of other ministers. Criminal prosecutions (s.5(d)) One of the most publicly scrutinized aspects of the Attorney General's role is the responsibility for criminal prosecutions encompassed in section 5 (d) and s. 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. Section 92 gives the provinces authority to legislate in matters related to the administration of criminal justice and thereby gives the provincial Attorney General authority to prosecute offences under the Criminal Code. 21

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police, the ultimate decision whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid the decision as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney. It is now an accepted and important constitutional principle that the Attorney General must carry out the Minister's criminal prosecution responsibilities independent of Cabinet and of any partisan political pressures. The Attorney General's responsibility for individual criminal prosecutions must be undertaken - and seen to be undertaken - on strictly objective and legal criteria, free of any political considerations. Whether to initiate or stay a criminal proceeding is not an issue of government policy. This responsibility has been characterized as a matter of the Attorney General acting as the Queen's Attorney - not as a Minister of the government of the day. This is not to suggest that decisions regarding criminal prosecutions are made in a complete vacuum. A wide range of policy considerations may be weighed in executing this responsibility, and the Attorney General may choose to consult the Cabinet on some of these considerations. However any decisions relating to the conduct of individual prosecutions must be the Attorney General's alone and independent of the traditional Cabinet decision making process. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, these decisions are made by the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys. An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's - responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest - which includes not only the community as a whole and the victim, but also the accused. The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available. The responsibility is to present the case fairly - not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law, even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public. One of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in understanding the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function. Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case. Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed. Legislative Responsibilities (s. 5(e) and (f)) The Attorney General has broad responsibilities associated with Government legislation. These responsibilities have been described as twofold. One is to oversee that all legislative enactments are in accordance with principles of natural justice and civil rights (see also s. 5(b) 22

above). This is obviously an important and broad area of responsibility. The second aspect of this responsibility is to advise on the constitutionality and legality of legislation. The Attorney General's legislative responsibilities are played out in a variety roles. The Office of Legislative Counsel reports to the Attorney General. Legislative Counsel plays a key role in ensuring the legal integrity of Government legislation. Although the Legislative Counsel's reporting relationship to the Attorney General does allow the Attorney General to provide guidance and set standards, individual pieces of legislation are drafted on instructions from client ministries and are not within the sole control of Legislative Counsel or the Attorney General. It should also be noted that Legislative Counsel also has a direct responsibility to the Legislature as the Office also drafts all private member's bills. The Attorney General has a further role to play as part of whatever Cabinet Committee is formed to review legislation and regulations. Here the Minister has an opportunity to comment on the technical issues related to legislation and regulations prior to Cabinet consideration. The Attorney General's role on legislative matters is as an adviser to the Cabinet. Although unlikely, Cabinet could, in theory, receive the Attorney General's legal opinion on legislation and choose to disregard it. The Attorney General's role is not independent of Cabinet decision making as in the area of criminal prosecutions. As was noted earlier, the Attorney General must make careful distinctions about the legal opinions and policy or political preferences being offered about legislation. Civil Litigation (s.5(h) and (d)) In addition to the specific responsibilities to conduct civil litigation on behalf of the Government and its agencies (s. 5(h)), the Attorney General has broader litigation responsibilities flowing from the historical powers of the Attorney General referred to in s. 5(d) of the Act. These powers are based on the Crown's parens patriae (parental) authority. The Attorney General's authority, therefore, is not only to conduct litigation in cases directly affecting the government or its agencies but also to litigate cases where there is a clear matter of public interest or public rights at stake. This has been characterized as a constitutional responsibility to ensure that the public interest is well and independently represented. It may involve interventions in private litigation or Charter challenges to legislation, even if the arguments conclude that the legislation does contravene constitutionally protected rights. Responsibility for Court Administration (s. 5(c)) A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the judiciary. Given the fundamental importance of the independence of the judiciary, the responsibility for courts administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for the principles of judicial independence must be exercised in this area. As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.

23

Prime Minister Stephen Harper

We found
Tracking Number RW352224381CA Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here.

Track Status
Product Type: Lettermail Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/05/28

11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing

PRIVY MAIL

Track History
Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/05/28 11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing Item successfully delivered Out for delivery

PRIVY MAIL

09:18 OTTAWA 08:08 OTTAWA

2009/05/26 20:51 KESWICK Item accepted at the Post Office

Receipt for the following document http://www.scribd.com/doc/15841808/CDF-Asks-Harper-ASSHOLE-or-STUPID-ASSRegistered-Mail

24

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson

We found
Tracking Number RW430567250CA Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here.

Track Status
Product Type: Lettermail Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06

11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing

S HENDRICKS

Track History
Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06 11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing Item successfully delivered Out for delivery

S HENDRICKS

08:41 OTTAWA 07:49 OTTAWA

2009/06/30 20:16 KESWICK Item accepted at the Post Office

Receipt for following document http://www.scribd.com/doc/16987127/Check-Mate http://www.scribd.com/doc/16769615/Government-Organized-Crime-TakeDown-by-LegalMeans

25

Deputy Minister RCMP Commissioner William Elliot

We found
Tracking Number RW430567056CA Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here.

Track Status
Product Type: Lettermail Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06

08:27

OTTAWA

Item successfully delivered

Track History
Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06 08:27 OTTAWA 08:27

Item successfully delivered Signature image recorded for Online viewing Out for delivery RCMP MAIL

07:49 OTTAWA

2009/07/03 16:13 KESWICK Item accepted at the Post Office

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17062727/Red-Coats-or-Camouflage-to-the-Rescue-or-Slaughter

26

Governor General Michaelle Jean ³Commander-in-Chief´ Canadian Forces

We found
Tracking Number RW430567042CA Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here.

Track Status
Product Type: Registered Mail Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06

11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing

B BENAMMAR

Track History
Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/06 11:59

Signature image recorded for Online viewing Item successfully delivered Out for delivery

B BENAMMAR

07:21 OTTAWA 05:46 OTTAWA

2009/07/03 16:12 KESWICK Item accepted at the Post Office

27

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14146637/Conflict-Interest-Ethics-Apr-11-09 Track

You were looking for:
Tracking Number: RW357718579CA Track Another

We found:
Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here. Product Type: Lettermail
Date of Event Time of Event Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/04/16

09:38

OTTAWA, ON Item successfully delivered

2009/04/16

09:38

Signature image recorded for Online viewing

M MERENGRE

2009/04/16

04:35

OTTAWA, ON Out for delivery

2009/04/11

10:39

KESWICK, ON Item accepted at the Post Office

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14146637/Conflict-Interest-Ethics-Apr-11-09

28

Registered mail to Minister of Public Safety Peter Van Loan

We found
Tracking Number RW430566991CA Please note that this is the most up-to-date information available in our system. Our telephone agents have access to the same information presented here.

Track Status
Product Type: Lettermail Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/10

09:50

OTTAWA

Item successfully delivered

Track History
Date Time Location Description Retail Location Signatory Name

2009/07/10 09:50 OTTAWA 09:50

Item successfully delivered Signature image recorded for Online viewing Out for delivery Out for delivery N BUTEAU

06:36 OTTAWA 2009/07/09 08:02 OTTAWA

2009/07/07 11:52 KESWICK Item accepted at the Post Office

Receipt for following document http://www.scribd.com/doc/17239175/Certified-Government-Conspiracy-Check-Mate http://www.scribd.com/doc/17162470/Certifying-the-Minister-of-Public-Safety-Peter-VanLoan

29

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Government-Of-Canada-742833.html
Government of Canada

Jun 15, 2007 14:15 ET

Federal Independent Investigator Releases Report on RCMP Pension and Insurance Plans

OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - June 15, 2007) - The independent investigator appointed by the federal government to examine matters related to the RCMP pension and insurance plans released his final report today and called for an immediate and comprehensive review of the governance structure and culture of the RCMP. He does not rule out the need for amendments to the RCMP Act. David Brown Q.C., former chairman of the Ontario Securities Commission, was asked to report to the Minister of Public Safety and the President of the Treasury Board nine weeks ago on key questions related to RCMP management responses to revelations about improprieties in the administration of the RCMP pension and insurance plans. This report is the seventh "investigation" into matters surrounding the RCMP pension and insurance funds. Prior to this report, RCMP management conducted an internal audit of the pension plan in 2003, ordered a criminal investigation in 2004, conducted internal investigations and an internal audit in 2005, followed by a report by the Auditor General of Canada and subsequent hearings by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts. Mr. Brown sought to clarify conflicting information presented during the six previous investigations into this matter. Working with forensic investigators from KPMG, more than 400,000 documents and emails were collected from RCMP servers and personal computers, revealing 3,500 emails of relevance - many of which had not before been reviewed. More than 35,000 pages of documents were reviewed and 25 witnesses interviewed before Mr. Brown began to write his findings. A Breach of Trust "What happened in the administration of the RCMP pension and insurance plans constituted a fundamental breach of trust between the RCMP and its current and retired members," says Mr. Brown. "I found myself forced beyond these events to comment on a broader breach of trust between RCMP management and its members." 30

Corporate Governance and Cultural Changes Urgently Needed at RCMP Mr. Brown recommends an urgent review and changes to the RCMP's culture, structure and governance. This should be conducted through a Task Force that will report back to the Minister of Public Safety by December 14, 2007. The Task Force should be comprised of members of the RCMP and senior public servants, as well as outside experts in relevant areas such as policing and governance. "The current paramilitary, chain-of-command management structure at the RCMP works for a small police force but not a $3 billion enterprise. I am confident in saying that this is not a governance model that investors in a $3 billion business would ever accept." Commissioner Zaccardelli's Impact on RCMP Culture Mr. Brown acknowledges that current governance problems at the RCMP are institutional and long-standing, however points to recent leadership deficiencies of former RCMP Commissioner Zaccardelli as exacerbating the problems around the pension and insurance matters and overall culture of the RCMP. "The issue with Commissioner Zaccardelli was not just his autocratic leadership style, but the way in which he articulated it. He expressed himself in passionate (some say intemperate) ways, with little regard or apparent respect for those with whom he was dealing." "In an already fractured culture, senior management was projecting an attitude of disinterest and callousness in respect of an issue of legitimate concern to every single member - past and present - of the Force: their pensions. In the process, the Commissioner lost his troops." Vindication of Whistleblowers Mr. Brown vindicates the individuals who brought improprieties to light and admonishes former senior members of the RCMP for their poor reaction to the revelations. "It is clear that several individuals who were instrumental in reporting and reviewing mismanagement were treated very unfairly by RCMP management and Commissioner Zaccardelli. To the extent that they were treated in accordance with 'RCMP practices', I believe those practices were used as a weapon in a war of personalities and as a cover to achieve the desired result of removing the whistleblowers."

31

"Each of the whistleblowers experienced career damage over the period in question while those responsible for the mismanagement were allowed soft landings. The individuals who brought these concerns forward should receive notations of commendation in their file, be recognized in a very public way for their contribution and the RCMP should put their careers back on track without penalty." OPP Review Required of 2004 Criminal Investigation Mr. Brown found that the criminal investigation requested by the RCMP in 2004 was not conducted independently. Mr. Brown stresses that it is impossible to determine whether or not the investigation materially suffered from this lack of independence and has recommended the Ontario Provincial Police immediately review the investigation to determine whether the findings are sound or whether a new investigation is required. Public Inquiry not Required - Time for Action

BULLSHIT!!!

Mr. Brown recommends against a full-blown public inquiry, saying that all relevant facts are now known and there is no reason - for an eighth time to revisit the processes or issues that have been discussed as part of the investigations. "At the conclusion of my work, I am able to report that there was no person with whom we wished to meet who declined to meet with us. Nor has any person declined to answer any question or to produce any document. Because of the extraordinary level of cooperation my office enjoyed from the RCMP under the command of Commissioner Busson, I had extensive access to all emails and documents. I can't conceive that access would have been greater had I been a commissioner under the Public Inquiries Act. Nor do I have any reason to believe that there is relevant information we have not received." Mr. Brown's appointment and authority as the Independent Investigator into Matters Relating to RCMP Pension and Insurance Plans under the Public Service Employment Act expires at midnight on June 15, 2007. BACKGROUNDER Federal Independent Investigator Releases Report on RCMP Pension and Insurance Plans MEDIA NOTE: The following is a summary of the questions posed to the Independent Investigator and his findings. Information presented in this media backgrounder is for the sole purpose of providing media with a quick 32

reference guide and is not intended to comprehensively cover all the details and subtleties of the report's findings. Obviously the issues involved are complex and detailed - as is the process and argumentation for many of the findings in the full report. Question 1: Was the RCMP's assessment of allegations of mismanagement of the RCMP pension and insurance plans conducted in an appropriate and timely manner? - Brown found the 2003 internal audit was both appropriate and timely (page 18) - Brown found the 2004 criminal investigation was not independent and not timely. It was impossible to determine whether the criminal investigation was ultimately 'appropriate' given the lack of independence; therefore, Brown has recommended an immediate Ontario Provincial Police review of the investigation. (pages 19-22) -. Brown found that it was an "error in judgment Brown found that the internal investigations concluded there had been wrongdoing on the part of senior officers; however, the RCMP was precluded from taking disciplinary action because their own limitation period had expired t" to have allowed this to happen. (pages 22-23) Question 2: Were the members and employees involved in the reporting or reviewing of mismanagement treated fairly and in accordance with RCMP procedures and practices? - Brown found that several individuals who were instrumental in reporting and reviewing mismanagement of the pension and insurance plans were treated very unfairly and recommends public recognition of their important contributions: - Ms. Revine originally uncovered information that lead to the series of investigations. At no point since 2003 have her conclusions been in doubt. The RCMP removed her from her position and caused her a tremendous amount of stress - ultimately affecting her health. Brown recommends that his findings be given significant weight in her current mediation with the RCMP and that she be publicly recognized for her important contribution. (pages 25-27) - Chief Superintendent Macaulay brought Ms. Revine's findings to Commissioner Zaccardelli and was immediately - and unacceptably punished by being transferred out of Headquarters. Even after the transfer, Macaulay continued to push for transparency and resolution of the issues identified. Macaulay has since been transferred back to 33

Headquarters. Brown recommends that a formal notation of commendation be attached to Macaulay's file and that the RCMP should publicly recognize his contributions - including by ensuring that he continues to enjoy the career he deserves. (page 27) - Staff Sergeant Frizzell worked on the criminal investigation under the difficult circumstances of having no independence from the RCMP to do his job. This included the RCMP ordering him to cease his investigation. Brown recommends that a formal notation of commendation be attached to Frizzell's file and that the RCMP publicly recognize his contribution. (pages 28-29) - Brown also recommends that the RCMP publicly recognize the contributions of Staff Sergeant Lewis (retired) and Staff Sergeant Walker. (page 29) Question 3: Did management respond appropriately and in a timely manner to mistakes or inappropriate conduct by members and employees? - Brown found that management's response was neither appropriate nor timely: - The RCMP did not rectify the issue of returning monies to the pension and insurance plans on a timely basis (page 17) - Although the RCMP did remove individuals responsible for the administration of the plans from their positions, the manner in which this was done left a perception of inaction and soft landing (page 32) - RCMP management has done little to remediate the cultural and governance problems that allowed these events to take place (pages 39-46) - The RCMP did an exceptionally poor job of communicating with those involved in uncovering the improprieties - which in part led to an escalation of concerns by these individuals (page 33) Question 4: Did management respond to findings of mismanagement or non-compliance in a timely and effective manner? - Brown found that while the RCMP dealt with individuals who were responsible for the mismanagement, nothing was done to change the culture or governance that allowed those individuals the authority to make the errors in the first place. Further, nothing was done vis-a-vis public servants after the removal of Mr. Ewanovich and Mr. 34

Crupi. (pages 35-36) Request for Recommendation #1: Provide a recommendation as to whether or not a more public inquiry with additional powers and authorities is necessary to address any outstanding questions. - Brown concludes a public inquiry with additional powers and authorities would not reveal any additional or new information. Brown received an "extraordinary level of cooperation" from the Commissioner of the RCMP and was given access to any and all emails, documents and witnesses he wished to review or see. (pages 37-38) - Brown notes that his report is the seventh "investigation" into this matter: 2003 internal audit, 2004 criminal investigation, 2005 internal investigation and internal audit, 2006 Auditor General Report and extensive review by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee. (page 37) - Brown finds that all relevant facts have been uncovered throughout the seven 'investigations' and it is now time for immediate action to correct fundamental governance and cultural problems at the RCMP. (page 47-48) Request for Recommendation #2: Provide a recommendation as to whether a review is needed with respect to the overall management of the RCMP. - Brown recommends an urgent and immediate Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change for the RCMP that will develop an appropriate governance structure and culture for the $3 billion organization. This recommendation is based, in part, on: - Brown found the current "paramilitary" chain-of-command governance model at the RCMP does not fit with a $3 billion organization. (page 40) - Brown found the RCMP's Code of Conduct is counter to a solid workplace disclosure policy and contains no protection for a whistleblower, and in fact can be used as a weapon in a war of personalities. (page 46) - Brown found that former Commissioner Zaccardelli's "autocratic" leadership style set a "tone at the top" that encouraged similar management styles among his management team. This was fundamentally damaging to the culture of the RCMP. (pages 41-42) - Brown found that Mr. Paul Gauvin, Deputy Commissioner of Corporate Management and Comptrollership, has accepted no responsibility for 35

the issues identified. (pages 42-43) - Brown found that although whistleblower protection was in place, it was never adequately operationalized and did not protect the individuals who came forward. (pages 43-44)

36

http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/rcmp-grc/rcmp-tfr-en.asp

          

Skip to content | Skip to institutional links Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca
Common menu bar l inks

Home > Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP
Institutional l inks

Task Force Terms of Reference Membership More information
Pro active Disclosu re

Proactive disclosure

Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP
On July 16, 2007, the Honourable Stockwell Day, Minister of Public Safety, announced the creation of a new five-member Task Force to provide advice on strengthening the accountability and governance of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). The Task Force will be chaired by David Brown, Q.C., Counsel with the firm Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, and former head of the Ontario Securities Commission. Other members include Linda Black, Richard Drouin, Norman Inkster, and Larry Murray. The mandate of the Task Force is to examine governance and cultural change in the RCMP. This was a key recommendation made by Mr. Brown, in his report as independent investigator into matters relating to RCMP pension and insurance plans, which was made public on June 15, 2007. The Task Force will provide recommendations that address issues identified in the independent investigator's report, including RCMP management structure, accountability and oversight, as well as clarifying workplace disclosure and disciplinary policies. The Task Force released their report of December 14, 2007.  Introduction: Rebuilding the Trust ± Report of the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP  Full Report: Rebuilding the Trust ± Report of the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP (PDF 834KB)  Sweeping Changes Recommended in Report on Governance and Culture Change in the RCMP (News Release, December 14, 2007)  Speaking notes by David Brown for the December 14, 2007 press conference The Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP commissioned reports from notable academics regarding topics central to its mandate. Several of these reports have been made available below in both English and French.  Background paper prepared for the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the RCMP (PDF 102KB) 37

by: Gilles Paquet Report to the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Examination of Internal Management Structures of Police Forces (PDF 123KB)  by: Police Executive Research Forum  RCMP Ombudsman Model (PDF 84KB)  by: Stewart Hyson, University of New Brunswick  Rethinking Police Governance, Culture & Management (PDF 413KB)  by: Christopher Murphy and Paul McKenna, Dalhousie University  Strengthening Governance at the RCMP (PDF 130KB)  by: Tim Plumptre, Institute On Governance  Report to the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Examination of External Oversight Bodies of Police Forces (PDF 173KB)  by: Police Executive Research Forum Date Modified: 2008-03-13
 

Top of Page Important Notices

38

View larger image

David Brown, chair of the Task Force on Governance and Cultural Change in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Ottawa Friday, Dec. 14, 2007. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

RCMP Commissioner William Elliot speaks to the media on Friday, Dec. 14, 2007.

Task force says RCMP should be 'separate entity'
Updated Fri. Dec. 14 2007 9:05 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff A task force reviewing the RCMP released a report Friday calling for fundamental changes to the way the police force is managed. The report, released by Toronto lawyer David Brown, said the Mounties have become mired in bureaucracy and must have more authority over their own staff and budget. "The RCMP is not just another federal department -- nor should it be," Brown said at a press conference Friday. "Members of the RCMP have the authority to make life-and-death decisions every day -- they fight organized crime and infiltrate terrorist cells -- but they don't have the authority to make simple expenditures or hire a new person without hours of paperwork and process.'' The report outlines 40 suggestions and makes three major recommendations:
y y y

The RCMP become a separate entity, removed from the affairs of the government The creation of a civilian board to oversee the organization and administration of the RCMP The creation of a more powerful complaints watchdog with the authority to impose its decision on the police force

39

The findings came after five months of research, including conversations with more than 2,000 Mounties and consultations with academics and management experts. Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day launched the task force after a report Brown released in June criticized Mountie pension and insurance plans, and also made allegations of abuse of authority and internal harassment. Brown said the task force came to see a picture of a revered Canadian institution with members struggling to do their best under an inefficient and poorly structured organization. "With remarkable, but disturbing consistency, we heard of chronic shortages of people and equipment, of overwork and fatigue, of issues of wellness, health and even safety,'' Brown said. According to the recommendations, the management board will report to the Public Safety minister and be responsible for financial affairs and personnel procurement. A Commission for Complaints and Oversight of the RCMP would replace several existing bodies that Brown says lack the authority to compel change. Brown said a council should ensure the board of management and independent commission are in operation no later than the end of 2009. Commissioner William Elliott said he agreed with the report's finding that the RCMP needs better oversight and review, but would not comment on specific recommendations. "There is simply no other option, the RCMP must change. And we must change in significant, relevant and meaningful ways to address the problems described in the task force's report," Elliott said. "I have read enough to know that it's an important document that will serve as one of the key drivers of change as we go forward." Elliott said that major changes are already underway, including the restructuring of the highest levels of management. Changes in Taser use In a surprise move, the RCMP announced Friday that it would be changing its policies on the use of Tasers. The Mounties issued a news release saying they will be asking officers to limit the use of Tasers "to situations where a subject is displaying combative behaviors or is being actively resistant."

40

They added that a bulletin outlining the new policy has now been sent to all members and the changes will be incorporated in all future training for Tasers, also known as a conducted energy weapons (CEW). The changes don't go as far as recommendations made earlier this week by a public complaints commission. The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP recommended in a 53-page report that the Mounties restrict the use of Tasers to situations when an individual is being "combative" or posing a risk of "death or grievous bodily harm" to the officer, themselves or the general public. The Commission also wanted Tasers to be re-classified as an "impact weapon" instead of its current status of "intermediate" device, the same category as pepper spray. Friday's RCMP release made no mention of re-classification. But it did agree to a commission recommendation for stricter reporting of Taser incidents. The Mounties said they would enhance their Taser database to include more reporting and analysis of all "use of force" incidents, including those involving Tasers. The Commission made 10 recommendations Wednesday following the death of Polish immigrant Robert Dziekanski last October. Dziekanski died after being Tasered by police during a confrontation at the Vancouver International Airport. He was the 18th person in Canada to die after being hit by a Taser in recent years and his death sparked international criticism of the use of Tasers.

With a report from CTV's Graham Richardson Comments are now closed for this story James Excellent News! The Taser is not being reclassified, stricter reporting procedures will be in place, and the weapon has not been made equal in usage to the sidearm. Well done. Solid changes that make sense, instead of impossible-in-application ones.

41

Chas The lack of honesty and integrity of our police forces in Canada leads to injustice and more violence amongst our youth and gang members. I have witnessed, I am sad to say, the corrupt investigation process of the RCMP first hand in North Vancouver, BC. It is always a hard scrub with the blue shield to whitewash and cover up and wrong doing and bring our entire justice system in to disrepute thereby creating more violence and less respect for the law by our youth today!

Jason A great start for the RCMP to accept some of the recommendations for the taser usage... Now, with the new report, perhaps some in higher management or members looking for a promotion will actually try to do the right thing and do the job, not just get the promotions and then look for the other available one... The problem with the RCMP is too many members are only out for themselves and not for the good of the force. Let's wait and see!!!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9838279/Stockwell-Day-November-3-and-5-2007 Page 13 NO 2 Tier

42

http://www.dwatch.ca/Clean_Up_the_System.html

You can help clean up the Canadian federal Government Accountability System so that 420 federal politicians, 2,000 political staff, 3,000 political appointees, and 350,000 government employees will all be effectively required to act honestly, ethically, openly, representatively and to prevent waste of the $220 billion of public money they spend each year (NOTE: For details about how to help clean up the Ontario provincial government's accountability system, click here):
y

y

y y y

READ the Democracy Watch's Summary of the 90 Undemocratic and Accountability Loopholes in Canada's Federal Government and/or the following Democracy Watch Report Card: Federal Conservatives' So-Called "Federal Accountability Act" and Related Decisions Earn a "D" Grade For Only Partially Increasing Government Democracy and Accountability (December 12, 2008) WRITE letters to federal politicians using the general Good Government Action Alert, or for more details go to the Action Alerts on the following Democracy Watch good government campaign pages: o Citizen Association Campaign o Government Ethics Campaign o Honesty in Politics Campaign o Money in Politics Campaign o Open Government Campaign o Voter Rights Campaign DONATE: Donate online now to government accountability in Canada PRINT AND USE the Good Government sticker/door sign SEND the link to this webpage to everyone you know by copying the link and emailing it

Report Card on Federal Canadian Political Parties' 2008 Good Government Election Platforms NDP Green Party C+ C

43

Bloc Quebecois Conservative Party Liberal Party

DEF

You can help clean up the Canadian federal Corporate Responsibility System so that 155,000 corporations (including half of the largest 500 corporations in Canada) will all be effectively required to act honestly, ethically, openly, representatively and to prevent waste (NOTE: For details about how to help clean up the Ontario provincial corporate responsibility system, click here):
y

y

y y

READ the following Democracy Watch news release: Report Card on Corporate Responsibility Platforms Reveals Many Key Gaps in All Parties' Platforms . . . (January 19, 2006) WRITE letters to federal politicians using the general Corporate Responsibility Action Alert, or for more details go to the Action Alerts on the following Democracy Watch corporate responsibility campaign pages: o Bank Accountability Campaign o Citizen Association Campaign o Corporate Responsibility Campaign DONATE: Donate online now to corporate responsibility in Canada SEND the link to this webpage to everyone you know by copying the link and emailing it Report Card on the 2006 Federal Canadian Political Parties' Corporate Responsibility Election Platforms

44

Please donate online now to government accountability and corporate responsibility in Canada

How about a humongous donation to mental health?
Since 1982 they were responsible to put a legal system in place capable of protecting every individual as guaranteed as there cannot be limitations or expiry dates as to when issues had to be dealt with because it is them that waste the time. You have to be a pathetic fool to buy in to this crap. They either have a competent system in place or they are organized crime as all evidence attests with their adeptness to gloss over the issues and dissolve the link to the DOJ ± that demanded a Public Inquiry in the first place. Of course the RCMP should be independent of the government and so should the legal system and every God damned law they enact must be scrutinized to ensure not one individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits is compromised. The Law Society that propagates personnel for the legal system have been irrefutable proven they do not severely discipline their people unless they attempt to do the right thing. We are talking about people¶s lives here and they are talking about sloppy paint jobs failing to keep the conspiracy blanket from consistently peeling off. It is so bloody obvious that the lawyers have infested the political, legal and corporate world and heavily invested and the Mulroney/Schreiber deal is far greater than just the tax evasion for it about the bribery of Lobbyist that obvious are allowed to hang around for that express purpose and when Democracy Watch went after them for that they found that was okay. What can I say? « They are ASSHOLES!!! and of course none of them see anything wrong because they are all on the take. There is no evidence to suggest they have even attempted to structure a competent responsible irreproachable system capable of supporting every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and it is their responsibility to demonstrate due diligence every time a person is victimized and the evidence regarding my personal incident back in June 2005 clearly shows they protected the criminal not the victim and by their negligence incites criminals not deter them and that is the irrefutably proven ideology of the Law Society as they have more victims than they need to supplement their luxurious lifestyle ransacking the tax payer for protection money and they 45

refuse to protect the people of the Lower Tier using the word ³Threshold´ because they know how we frown on the term 2- Tier which their obviously is and they vehemently deny. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The evidence they state does not meet their threshold is absolutely irrefutable of the the persons guilt and they all refuse to explain the terminology associated with the word that is absolutely obvious. When they do not deal with the criminal element they simply flourish and so does the Law Society «the same as they do by ransacking society to provide them an expanding industry in the poverty sector that they ransack the people to fill up the Legal Aid kitty to defend the criminal element that naturally evolves from hopelessness and despair while they bastards world wide created the financial crisis the is putting many out of work while they are looking for a 50% raise from the Legal Aid kitty knowing that the majority of the Middle Class that finance the defence of the criminal element they create cannot afford to access the system themselves. I have presented the evidence and they tell me to get a lawyer if I think I can finance an offensive against them supported by the taxpayer that doesn¶t have a clue as to what is going on as they are too busy trying to keep their heads above water so they can see the alligators to fight them off because the government refuses to drain the swamp they deliberately create to keep them in business at a comfortable lifestyle while there are many who hold these scum of the earth in high esteem. There are people starving and they allow the corporate world to write off expense accounts as they dine in luxury and it simply is world wide therefore if the corporations aren¶t treated just as sweet as they like to be then they threaten to take their jobs elsewhere. We have to tell them to go to hell and don¶t buy their products. If people were not buying their products where would they be and as for the banks it is the people¶s money they use to inflate the prices. The banks must be owned by the people if we are to have a stable economy and stock manipulation has to seize. Of course the crooks will argue « and of course they are innocent as all the money disappears into Swiss banks and now apparently British Columbia. Where did Mulroney stash his money and where did it come from? He is a lawyer and plays major roles in several big corporations and in the states and he obviously has influence with the government decisions and no matter what they do the people get in the ass.

46

To even suggest that they need more laws to tighten up honesty in the governments and corporations is extraordinarily observe as ³The Spirit of the Law´ (Constitution) is ³The Spirit of the Golden Rule´ that is the epitome of simplicity and sanity that has forever blown in the wind within the grasp of quadriplegics easily seen by the blind well understood by us all at 5 prior to the first day of school. They simply shift their paper work to benefit the corporations and themselves and when they blow all the money they just come for more from the tax payer. When they public really up in arms they create agencies claiming they are independent of the government which is absolutely BULLSHIT and these agencies simply protect their conspiracy the same as the Law Society of Upper Canada who are behind it all irrefutably documented and it has now been submitted as evidence in support of Dolores Smith who is up on trumped up charges by the RCMP in Dawson Creek as they continue to attempt to cover up the murders of her 2 friends and another person was murdered who told Dolores they were murdered.. This evidence has been provided by registered mail to Parliament via Prime Minister Stephen Harper, DOJ ± Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson, Minister of Public Safety My MP Peter Van Loan, Deputy Minister RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and Governor General Michaelle Jean ³Commander-in-Chief´ of the Canadian Forces which assuredly is just a puppet position. They have all been provided the evidence for years and now have been informed of the murders in Dawson Creek since May 8 2009 and the town¶s people and witnesses fear for their lives with Hells Angels running loose with their drug trade where there are witnesses that Harper is involved. When I introduced the evidence May 11 2009 to British Columbia Attorney General Wally Oppal the morning Dolores went to court for sentencing her Legal Aid lawyer keith Jones was late for court presumably being informed by Wally Oppal when he arrived he immediately told Dolores not to say a word or he would quit and in fact made her sign a form that would not sat word threatening that she would not be assigned another lawyer. She has 2 other court cases yet to go to all trumped up over the same thing so she was afraid and signed the letter. When she was found guilty Dolores was quite upset when they Judge was about to pass sentence she told her lawyer Keith Jones she did not give a damn whether he quits and she was going to speak when he immediately spoke to the judge saying Dolores is too upset and they held sentencing to another day which Doleres informed last weel will be in September not mentioning the day, but also informed the other 2 charges against her were dropped as I understand it and have asked her to get a letter stating why. She was originally to go back for sentencing in June or July but now set back to September while they try to manipulate their way out of this because if the evidence is entered into evidence it is all over for them. If they refuse to allow evidence in her support as did Keith Jones who Dolres has now fired then it is all over for them. 47

It is quite possible they will just state they have further reviewed the evidence and drop the charge thereby locking the Charter Democracy Force evidence out of court where it needed to be to knock them off their asses. Should they do that it will be obvious but everything these scum of the earth do is obvious and yet they get away with it because that is what they do as unchecked government organized crime personified that exists world wide. In any case the people must rise to the occasion oth in Dawson Creek and jump all over the Mulroney/Screiber affair and revisit the Chretien and Martin crap that were just facades like the BULLSHIT that is costing the taxpayer¶s billions over Mulroney where they are all pulling big bucks from the people again while they put on the façade of looking seriously and deep into the issues as they all have a vested interest in keeping corporate bribery legal if you can believe their imbecilic thinking that works on the people to their luxurious benefit. It is absolutely outrageously incomprehensible yet the reality. When Mulroney or Stephen Harper goes down in September they whole conspiracy will collapse and the people will begin sueing their asses off for failure to demonstrate due diligence to protect the people as guaranteed and for demonstrating due diligence to protect themselves from the people with a humongous waste of our money. It is over and the money is coming back to the people and many who thought their shit doesn¶t stink will eat it for the rest of their lives and the end of the ³Struggle of innocent Humankind´ will have begun world wide nipping the Bilderberg New World Order scam before chaos sets in. That you can read about on the www.CDFWorldOrder.ca site and there is plenty on the www.charterdemocractforce.cc of the serious issues in Canada. There is also the matter of the OPP cooperating with an anti-aboriginal group that was to meet last week in Cayuga as I recall having not heard anything nor having an opportunity to look into it. These people are absolutely crazy frenzied by wealth and power and the easiness they can ransack the people and still have them respect them. There will be sanity and there will be severe punishment consistent with the Constitution. I mentioned many times the Accountability Act, 2006 was just a façade in an attempt to cover up the fact they that they never had a competent responsible irreproachable system in place consistent with the Constitution namely because they never intended to any more than they do when they create agencies when under pressure calling them independent to deceive the people while they use their money to finance them to put on the façade and protect themselves. No different than the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP or the Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics. 48

There can be no such thing by competent responsible and irreproachable persons prerequisite of the support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. It is absurd the matter even needs to be discussed. The legal profession and the government simply have used the trust and money taken from the people under false pretence and structured a crime syndicate with their entire overhead financed by the people to use the entire system to ransack the people and protect themselves while doing it and they have not a shred of evidence to suggest other wise. Even the reports they use the taxpayers money to support their tax grab to fill the Legal Aid coffers gently tells them they are not protecting every individual if they cannot all afford a lawyer. They are lawyer based dealing with the issues after the fact whereas emphasis has to be to protect the people before they become victims and that demands an all out attack on amoral inclination and the criminal element that would change the lawyer system drastically literally putting them out of work and many others that thrive on hopelessness and despair They are simply back-asswards ASSHOLES intent on a booming business for themselves absolutely indifferent to society as they see the working people as theirs to do whatever the hell they feel like to their humongous benefit. They do all their deals in the backroom and simply present it to the people the way they want to hear it and immorality runs wild. The people just become immune to their crap and it will not change until very serious punishment is dealt out and it begins at the top with the Prime Minister and former Prime Ministers. The hierarchy of the OPP are no different than the RCMP and in fact the hierarchy of all corporations and even the aboriginal are all the same due the environment the illegitimate legal systems create and allow. Evidence is everything the Law Society and propagates will hear from the people and due punishment is mandatory for their guaranteed protection prior to being victimized. They know the governments are crooks and should be only too pleased for this opportunity to finally deal with them.

Democracy Watch will inform for money but they will not tell the truth and pluck them them by the roots thus ending their own ransacking career as they cooperate with them for the luxurious business they created thriving off the symptoms as does charities and the Church as bottom feeders while giving the people a false sense of security.

49

Welcome to: www.goodgovernment.ca

The System is the Scandal!
and no one should be surprised that Canadian governments, politicians, government employees, corporations and big business executives act dishonestly, unethically, secretively, nonrepresentatively or wastefully --- the system encourages them to do so through weak rules, weak enforcement, and weak penalties. This is not at all to say that all, most or even many politicians, government employees or corporate executives are dishonest, unethical, secretive, nonrepresentative or wasteful -- but if any of these people act in these ways they will often not be caught, let alone penalized, because of loopholes in laws and rules and weak enforcement systems. Incredibly, the laws and enforcement of parking a car illegally are stronger than most government accountability and corporate responsibility laws and enforcement systems in Canada, and in some cases the penalties for parking illegally are higher than for government officials or corporate executives who act dishonestly, unethically, unrepresentatively, secretively or wastefully! For the past 140 years, since Canada became a nation, politicians and government officials have been playing a sort of shell game by sometimes strengthening laws, but then weakening enforcement, or strengthening enforcement at the same time as creating loopholes in laws, and in almost every case penalties have remained too weak to discourage violations. While governments and corporations do bad things for many reasons, often it is because they are operating in bad ways. Especially when governments operate in bad ways, they usually do not require corporations to act in good ways (because they make

Français

FOR MORE

50

INFORMATION, CONTACT: Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch Tel: (613) 241-5179 [email protected]

secret deals behind closed doors with corporate lobbyists). And unfortunately, the public always pays one way or another when governments or corporations act in bad ways. See set out on this page are Action Alerts about Democracy Watch's campaigns to increase government accountability and corporate responsibility in Canada -- to ensure governments, politicians and their staff and appointees, and government employees, and corporations and corporate executives, all pay a price for acting irresponsibly. Politicians, government officials, and big business executives are resisting changes to the system that would increase their accountability for wrongdoing. They just don't get it, so we have to give it to them until they do! Democracy Watch needs your support to clean up Canada's government accountability and corporate responsibility systems --- to strengthen the rules, the enforcement and the penalties for irresponsible activities by governments and corporations. You can help clean up the system to prevent future scandals! For general background on how the system is the scandal, read the following Democracy Watch article about the Many Changes Needed Before Canada Will Be a Democracy Finally, if you think Democracy Watch is exaggerating how much Canada's government accountability and corporate responsibility systems are the scandal, consider the following survey results and reports:
y

y

The Fall 2007 Ipsos Reid poll found that more than 70% of Canadians believe large companies have too much influence on the decisions of their government and they want a more aggressive crack down on the activities and influence of national and multinational corporations; The 2007 Global Integrity Report ranked Canada 8th overall out of 55 countries assessed, but 13th overall in the Government

51

y

y

y

Accountability category (worse than countries such as Latvia, Bulgaria, Romania, Malawi, Philippines, Peru, Pakistan and Colombia), and 15th overall in the Anti-Corruption and Rule of Law category (worse than countries such as Jordan, Bulgaria, Costa Rica, Romania, Latvia, Argentina, India, Vanuatu, Kenya and Ukraine); Democracy Watch's Summary of the 90 Undemocratic and Accountability Loopholes in Canada's Federal Government; Democracy Watch's Report Card on Corporate Responsibility Platforms Reveals Many Key Gaps in All Parties' Platforms . . . (January 19, 2006); The 2007 Transparency International poll found that almost two-thirds of Canadians believe that Canadian governments have not been effective at stopping government corruption, and almost one-half believe corruption is increasing.

52

To: Mary Dawson Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics [email protected] Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick, On L4P 2P8 [email protected] Hi Commissioner Mary Dawson Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch has requested that I drop you a message, something about ethics - Mulroney and Schreiber ±Conflict of Interest and on and on and then something about Rob and Stephen. You must get tired of reading all about this kind of stuff, eh? I know I do. In fact I have written you a few times about my concerns with the whole damn government. I identified it as a government conspiracy against the people with the Minister of Justice and Attorney General Robert Nicholson and the Prime Minister being the King pin, after all he appoints the Minister of Justice doesn¶t he? You realize my accusations are not just directed at the PM and the Minister of Justice because it is the whole damn bunch of you who are caught up in as it is a traditional thing which the Attorney General is responsible to uphold along with that most elusive concept - the rule of law- that hard to easily define well established legal principle that protects the individual and society as a whole. I told you how it was the responsibility of the Attorney General«..no no no««the Fiction of the Attorney General whose main purpose is to have the people believe they have a voice and the elected representatives actually care for the people as if they were one with them«..something like that. It¶s all on my web sites as you know. I gave the address when I wrote to have you charge the Law Society of Upper Canada with Conflict of Interest because they are quite adamant their members do not have to give a damn about the individual¶s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms. Damdest thing eh? In fact they don¶t give a damn about evidence or any of that kind of stuff, because it¶s all about money with them. No kidding!! You had a chance to view the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document didn¶t you? Sure they admit their member¶s only obligation is to vigorously advance their client¶s interests which sounds to me they will trample all over an individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights for money. No I µam not joshin you. I¶m thinking perhaps you didn¶t read it because that is exactly what this lawyer did to me and when I complained I was told they don¶t see anything wrong with it. You know what has happened don¶t you? The whole damn legal system got caught up in the fiction and actually thought they were fooling the people and I suppose they were a bit and it became a habit, It¶s just a natural thing to do to be traditionally unscrupulous and all with the Attorney General guarding that most elusive concept, hard to easily define, you know the one that was a well established legal principle only the professionals would be aware of . Right, kind of like shooting fish in a barrel. Well habits will get you into trouble like getting into drugs and stuff like that. So anyway, they all seemed to miss the 1982 enactment of the Constitution where the individuals guaranteed Charter Rights were slipped into the Law and they have just carried on their old traditional

53

ways and the Attorney General has guarded- the rule of law- as was his traditional responsibility and each Attorney General has done the same right to this very day, 25 years since the individual was guaranteed mercy from these bastards. Oh, I forgot to ask, are you a lawyer? It would be an awful waste of time if you were right? They are everywhere you know. In fact the whole damn government is infested with them. I¶ll bet the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day is one too. How¶s my complaint about him coming along? Oh dear, here I am wasting your time just reiterating everything over and over again when the RCMP are closing in anyway. You read about that on my web site didn¶t you.? Sure, the evidence I have gathered over the passed 2 ½ years irrefutably proves the conspiracy and when my mother and I dropped it off at the the RCMP station requesting Sgt. Steinbech to commence or cause to commence proceedings against the various government personnel he refused to do it stating this is just how it is? You know what I told him? Right, it is because it is how it is that I want them dealt with and the government restructured to be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual¶s guaranteed Charter Rights. Well he refused to take the documents so I wrote Inspector Verheule of the RCMP out in Milton and when he refused to respond I filed a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP and now the RCMP Commissioner is required to look into the evidence published on my web sites like I have requested you and many others who are referenced in my writings. I request once again you study the aforesaid evidence and commence or cause to commence proceedings against the government personnel within your jurisdiction which should include Stockwell Day, Robert Nicholson, the Prime Minister and others includes members of the Law Society of Upper Canada. Oh there¶s a whole lot more but you have got plenty to get you started. Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail (document) and give me a heads up on how things are progressing and I am sure William Elliot of the RCMP would appreciate it. What do you think about the new Commissioner anyway? Do you think he¶ll turn? How about the Commission for Public Complaints? Do you think the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP are in on the conspiracy like the Civilian Commission on Police Services and the Ontario Ombudsman and Louis Theoret of the Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime. Yeah, they¶re all in on it and as I say the irrefutable evidence is all on the web sites. I did mention Louis in my e-mail to you didn¶t I? Well if I didn¶t I want you to commence proceedings against him too. It¶s all explained in the documents on the web site and you have been provided the site addresses but should you have misplaced them you will find them in the ³Cover Check Mate December 8 2007.doc´ attached document and have a look at the other attachment ³Check Mate December 8 2007´ I don¶t have a whole lot of confidence in the RCMP with the way things went down with the Standing Committee on Public Accounts when they were looking into the RCMP pension fund thing.

54

You remember where the upper command was harassing staff, for attempting to look into the Pension fund fiasco and when the DOJ was linked to it the Standing committee was ordered to Sit. Some wanted a Public Inquiry and rightly so but the Conservatives shut that down. Harper a Conservative isn¶t he? Just recently I heard of other cover ups by Stephen and Rob««.Oh yes, that¶s where we came in right? The following by Duff Connacher has got that covered.

Well Duff I did as you requested and it was no bother at all. I thank you for the opportunity. Perhaps if you could direct some attention to the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot it may give him a little encouragement knowing we are all counting on him. It is his job you know to eradicate this persistent conspiracy having been provided the irrefutable evidence.

Frank gallagher
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Action Alert listserve Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ACTION Alert: Stop unethical Harper-Mulroney-Schreiber situations

PLEASE PASS THIS MESSAGE ON to everyone you know in Canada, and if you have any questions about this email, contact Democracy Watch by email at: <[email protected]> Dear Friend of Democracy, Your help is needed right now to stop Prime Minister Stephen Harper from trying to cover-up dishonest, unethical, secretive and wasteful activities, both in the past in former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's government, and in the current federal government. SEND IN YOUR OWN ETHICS COMPLAINT ABOUT PRIME MINISTER HARPER AND JUSTICE MINISTER NICHOLSON As you may have seen reported on CTV, CBC, and in newspapers across Canada last week, Democracy Watch has filed a complaint with the federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner because Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Justice Minister Robert Nicholson are making all the decisions about how the government handles the Mulroney-Schreiber situation, even though both Harper and Nicholson are in a conflict of interest as they have an interest in protecting themselves given their connections to Mulroney. SET OUT FURTHER BELOW is a sample letter for you to send by email or fax or mail to the federal Ethics Commissioner calling on her to order Harper and Nicholson to comply with the Conflict of Interest Act and stop making decisions to protect themselves and Mulroney. Please help stop this unethical situation, and help ensure that all future public inquiries will be fair and impartial. 55

********** AND PLEASE SEND A LETTER CALLING ON FEDERAL PARTY LEADERS TO CLEAN UP THE SYSTEM, FINALLY Did you know that, because of loopholes in federal laws (even after the passage of the socalled "Federal Accountability Act"), Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney could still be corporate lobbyists in secret today, and Schreiber could still give unlimited amounts of money in secret to all federal politicians after they left office, either as a donation or as payment for lobbying? Did you know that, because of more than 85 loopholes in the federal government's accountability system, it is legal: to be dishonest in politics; to make secret unlimited donations to all types of political candidates; for MPs, riding associations and political parties to have secret trust funds; to lobby in secret; to do secret polling with the public paying; for MPs switch parties; for the Prime Minister to appoint more than 2,000 law enforcement officers without any public review or hearings (including public inquiry commissioners), and; for federal politicians, their staff and senior government officials to be involved in policy-making processes in which they have a direct financial interest, and to become lobbyists soon after they leave office? Did you know that the Accountability Act doesn't even protect all federal government employees who blow the whistle on government wrongdoing (and doesn't protect any other whistleblowers at all)? With a federal election likely happening sometime in the next 6 months, now is a key time to push all federal parties to make strong pledges to close all the loopholes, and strengthen the enforcement and penalties, in the federal government's accountability system. Corporate lobbyists are pushing to weaken the accountability system, and politicians are reluctant to increase their own accountability, so the federal political party leaders need to hear from you or they won't do anything to ensure honest, ethical, open, representative and wastepreventing government. PLEASE GO TO the following Democracy Watch webpage and use the sample letter to send a letter to all federal political party leaders telling them to clean up the federal government's accountability system, finally:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/actsystem.htm

OR GO TO:
http://www.goodgovernment.ca

AND click on the "Good Government Action Alert" link. To see background information on more than 15 situations in the past 15 years of federal politics that have revealed the 85 loopholes in the federal government's accountability system, go to: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsNov1807.html ******** PLEASE ALSO DONATE NOW to help stop dishonest, unethical, secretive, unrepresentative and wasteful politics in Canada at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html Democracy Watch does not accept money from governments or large corporations -- without your ongoing support Democracy Watch will have to shut down its good government 56

campaigns (the only such campaigns in Canada) ******** HERE IS THE SAMPLE LETTER FOR YOU TO SEND TO THE FEDERAL ETHICS COMMISSIONER Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson Parliament of Canada P.O. Box 16, Centre Block 22nd Floor, 66 Slater St. Ottawa, Canada K1A 0A6 Fax: 613-995-7308 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Dawson, When Canadians face allegations about themselves or their associates, they don't get to decide the limits of the investigation, control witnesses, or choose their own judge. This is exactly what Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson have the opportunity, and powers, to do with regard to the Mulroney-Schreiber situation. Canadians don't get to make such decisions because they would be in a conflict of interest in doing so. On Friday, November 9, 2007, Mr. Harper showed that he recognized he and all federal Conservatives are in a similar conflict of interest with regard to the Mulroney-Schreiber situation when he admitted that "it's impossible, frankly, for the government to make an impartial judgement on how to proceed" in responding to the situation. Former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney has acted as an adviser to Prime Minister Harper, and both are named in an affidavit filed in court by Karlheinz Schreiber. Mr. Nicholson was appointed to Cabinet by Mr. Harper, and can be removed from Cabinet at any time for any reason by him. Both Mr. Harper and Mr. Nicholson were sent information packages by Mr. Schreiber several months ago. Mr. Harper has already made decisions in dealing with the Mulroney-Schreiber situations, and as far as we know Mr. Nicholson has been involved in making decisions concerning the extradition of Mr. Schreiber to Germany. Both Mr. Harper and Mr. Nicholson, along with all other Conservative Cabinet ministers, have the power under the federal Inquiries Act to set the terms of reference for an inquiry into the situation, and to choose the inquiry commissioner(s). The federal Conflict of Interest Act clearly prohibits Cabinet ministers from making, or taking part in, decisions in which they have a private interest, and private interests are not limited to financial matters. Mr. Harper and Mr. Nicholson have an interest in protecting their own reputations, as well as the reputation of Mr. Harper's adviser, Mr. Mulroney. All other Conservative Cabinet ministers, and their staff, and the senior government officials they have appointed (deputy ministers, assistant deputy ministers etc.), as well as Conservative MPs, share the private interest in protecting the reputation of Mr. Harper. As a result, none of these people should be making, or taking part in, decisions concerning the Mulroney-Schreiber situation. At the very least, to dilute their conflict of interest, they should be required to give the leaders of the opposition parties in the House of Commons the power of approval of their decisions, to ensure through this multi-partisan process that decisions are fair 57

and impartial. Please issue a ruling immediately to ensure that no federal Conservatives make, or take part in, any more decisions with regard to the Mulroney-Schreiber decision, or that, at the very least, they give the opposition party leaders the power of approval of their decisions. I look forward to hearing back from you. Your name, Your email and address

FOR MORE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT THIS SITUATION, GO TO the following Democracy Watch webpage:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsNov2607.html

*************** THANK YOU for sending your letters, and for your ongoing support of Democracy Watch's good government campaigns, Duff Conacher, Coordinator Democracy Watch P.O. Box 821, Stn. B Ottawa, Canada K1P 5P9 Tel: (613) 241-5179 Fax: (613) 241-4758 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.cleangovernment.ca Since 1993, cleaning up and making governments and corporations more responsible and accountable to you, and making Canada the world's leading democracy -- please donate now at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html Duff: Useless, worthless, ineffective, broken, no good Frank: Forthright, free, honest, guileless, open, blunt, truthful, candid Very interesting eh Duff? Every person is responsible to comply with the Constitution and obviously must be competent and irreproachable to do so for we finance the entire legal system to the certainty of our equal protection and benefits as guaranteed. Unequivocally the personnel of the legal system must not only be competent responsible and irreproachable but must with exemplary fortitude and conviction seek out all pertinent truths as to any individual¶s non compliance and when found guilty dispense due punishment attentive to deterrence being the only viable means to protect every person as guaranteed prior to becoming victimized when on that eventuality the nefarious bent propagates of the Law Society feast off the symptoms of their deliberate failure to do so which provides the 58

opportunity for bottom feeders such as you to look for donations while cooperating with the conspiracy as the people trust the Accountability Act, 2006 to be a legitimate action in the structuring of the legal system consistent with the Constitution that demands competent responsible irreproachable persons with exemplary fortitude and conviction to structure a system adept to the support of the Charter guarantee. Obviously you play a major role in the deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration of their illegitimate laws that are enacted to cover up one after another for the distinct purpose to ransack society and protect them selves every step of the way with you participating and profiting in the deliberate befuddlement. You are no different than any other bottom feeders such as charities and Church and should the government be legitimate you would all be out of careers being why you have all refused to help me expose the ingenious scam perpetrated by the hierarchy of the government organized crime.

Duff: Useless, worthless, ineffective, broken, no good

So we find that Duff who was born inherently useless to society as are we all, found a way to turn that into cash by subscribing to the ideology of the nefarious bent of the Law Society by putting on the two faced front One for the Money «. Two for the Show

When the people see the show they will demand their money back

.

59

December 23, 2007 Major James Simiana Manager National Defence Public Affairs Office ± Atlantic Halifax, NS In response to your e-mail of December 19 2007 attached the enemy of the people of Canada has taken over the government and you feel this is outside the focus of your office!!!. It¶s no surprise to me but the people will be interested to know I am sure. I suggest you refocus. Expand your thinking capabilities. No government authority is going to be granted authority by the conspirators to eradicate them from the people¶s government and you must be able to think. They don¶t wear uniforms so you have to be able to determine who the enemy is by other means. They are the ones who are ransacking the people You will find a copy of this on my web site along with the rest of the evidence. You have been advised of possible escalation of the issues relative to the well being of the Canadian people who pay your wages and buy your toys. It is my civil duty to advise you of the serious nature of the issues and it your duty to be cognizant of the facts before you get bullshit from the enemy and start firing on your own people. I am quite aware you people are of the belief you needn¶t keep up on politics but this is not politics, it is a conspiracy by the government personnel against the people as the evidence irrefutably shows. I have informed the other political parties with the documents published on my web site and their indifference to the well being of the moral majority has been documented and evidenced by their failure to respond implicating them in the conspiracy.

It is incomprehensible that the Armed Forces are not concerned about the people of Canada. Who is ³thee´ in Oh Canada. We stand on guard for thee? Believe it or not Canada is the people who elect and finance the representatives to run the government for us 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

60

You people are out messing with the politics of other countries by order of a tyrannical government which has infiltrated Canada because of your ignorance of what is going on at home. It is a shame you had to be informed of the government conspiracy that has occurred while you stand on guard for Canada but now you have been duly informed and documented. Refusal to review the evidence or failure to comprehend the government is a conspiracy will not be well received by the people and in fact it is quite frightening to realize we have been financing our armed forces to serve the despots for their personal gain. I adamantly request you review the evidence to be cognizant to the facts so when the government conspirators order you to fire on your families and friends you may have second thoughts. People with guns should be required to have a certain amount of intelligence.

See attachment ³How to Dismantle a Government Conspiracy´ Frank Gallagher PS I will continue to keep you apprised of what is going on under your noses and documenting and publishing the fact. You are accountable to the people and will have an opportunity to account for your irresponsible attitude and incompetence to protect the people from alien forces who do not respect our Constitution. If I were in a position of authority you would be stripped of your command and held to answer to the people for treasonable offences.
Schools out, they are not toys you have and it¶s time for the war games to stop.
The corruption and conspiracy is not limited to Canada for it runs rampant throughout the world to the humongous detriment of the moral majority who, believe it or not, really want peace. The government personnel are in it for their own personal gains who do not give a damn about the people except for what the people can do for them as you are well aware as you are fighting for them and their affluent friends financed by us.

Read the evidence and be informed. Perhaps you have not grasped the seriousness of the issues.
That is very scary

61

I am quite aware you could roll a tank over here or send a combat unit to take me out but it is time for you to focus on the enemy and if every other Armed Force of the world would do likewise we would finally have that elusive world peace. Don¶t worry about your pensions, the moral majority would be far better off if we retired all you people of the upper command before you finish us all off.

From: NDPAO Atlantic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Your recent emails Dear Mr. Gallagher; As the subjects of your recent flurry of emails are outside the focus of our office, this is to kindly request that you stop sending our office ± and any of our sister offices within the DND/CF across the country as well ± any further emails. We are not in a position to respond to what you have to say. Thank you. Major James Simiana Manager National Defence Public Affairs Office ± Atlantic Halifax, NS

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 17 décembre 2007 09:26 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Date Correction

62

December 17 2007 The RCMP Commissioner¶s Report is due sometime this week With Christmas due to arrive on schedule it would be nice if the report did too consistent with the law and God. It is Jesus¶ birthday after all and it would be a great gift for him as well as the moral majority.

http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition

63

Frank Gallagher December 13 2007 To: Canadian Bar Association [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Dear Canadian Bar Association

34 Riverglen Drive Keswick. On [email protected]

On November 13 2007 I sent the above e-mail addresses a copy of the document on pages 2-4 addressing issues, which I had hoped you would look into in some format. I wasn¶t specific but did request: ³I would appreciate however knowing if you see the necessity to address the issues in some manner.´ I was intentionally quite vague as to what I was requesting you to do, testing your integrity with the intention to see if you have any more concern for the individual¶s guaranteed Charter Rights than the Law Society of Upper Canada and by not hearing from any of you in a month I believe I can conclude with a definite no. (Now over a year and a half) The attachments referenced in the e-mail to you ³Mad me worry Why?´ and ³Mad Glad mostly Sad ..Why?´ which can be found on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/charterdemocracy-force/web/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms

where you will find a copy of this document should have caught your interest I thought if you actually respected the law and were concerned about the conduct of lawyers in Canada requesting and I quote: ³In any case I would like you to review the actions taken by the Law Society of Upper Canada against the particular lawyer referenced within the said file and take action where it is due in your professional opinions.´ I request now, that you respond as to what action you have taken in regards to the lawyer referenced in the document Law Society of Upper Canada which you can find in 2 parts at the top of my aforesaid web site. In case you are not aware I have given cause for the RCMP to investigate government corruption and conspiracy and they are studying the evidence I have provided them and published on the above web site and http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracyforce/web/law-society-of-lower-tier

64

The said Part 1 and Part 2 Law Society of Upper Canada document is self explanatory evidencing the fact that the Law Society of Upper Canada condones the actions of lawyer Gregory M. Mulligan and I presume at the time of this writing you do to. But to remove the presumption and make it fact I hereby request you study the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document for the purpose of removing his license to practice law in Ontario. That request is directed to which ever of you has jurisdiction in these matters but it should concern you all. Surely you must all be aware of the seriousness of the issues and I understand your reluctance to get involved.

However, for the record I request you all to respond stating whether or not you agree with the conclusions of the Law Society of Upper Canada regarding the actions of Gregory M. Mulligan and copy the Bar Association having jurisdiction. Your cooperation will be appreciated and a non response will be deemed as concurrence with the Law Society of Upper Canada implicating you in the conspiracy against the Canadian people. The Law Society of Upper Canada document Part 1 and Part 2 clearly demonstrates their members act in a manner adverse to the supreme law of the Country, the Constitution Act, 1982 adverse to the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and Freedoms for financial benefit whereas the Law Society of Upper Canada has either stated or implied their members do not give a damn about the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and their only obligation is to vigorously advance the interests of their clients in laymen terms meaning they will trample over any individual¶s guaranteed Charter tights for money, no questions asked. Evidence does not concern them and clearly stated within the Law Society of Upper Canada document. Should any of you have integrity this is your opportunity to prove it voluntarily and I suggest you keep these words of Confucius in mind for the people certainly will. Make no mistake the people will have these words in mind. There were no dates in this history, bur scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS, and MORALITY,«finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase; EAT PEOPLE. Given the vital role you and your members play in matters of the Constitution having been called to the Bar to practice law it is presumed you are coherent with the verbiage of the Charter and the spirit it is written where the supremacy of God is recognized by the supreme law of Canada where 65

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Obviously the Law Society of Upper Canada is an arrogant society of the opinion they are above the law and in fact are nothing but Organized Crime whose members are no different than hired goons akin to the mafia with only one exception where they need not apply force for they have duped the police into doing their bidding. Your days are numbered and I highly suggest you take this opportunity to get on side with the people who financed the system for the purpose of a moral society unless you can provide evidence to dispute it. I can not over emphasize the need for you Bar Association people to take action to demonstrate where you stand regarding the supreme law of Canada where immediate action is required to commence or cause to commence proceedings against your rogue member Gregory M. Mulligan or be deemed rogues yourself for such action by said member is incomprehensible and will not be tolerated. If you can not maintain or refuse to control your membership actions will be taken against you in accordance with the supreme law of Canada in the spirit of God. The RCMP are about to show the Canadian people that nobody is above the law especially those people in the legal profession who dare to make a mockery of the Constitution adverse to the Charter rights of the moral majority. I strongly advise you study the evidence on my web sites and act appropriately to bring about the restructuring of the legal system conducive to the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. Immediate acknowledgement upon receipt is inquired indicating your intentions to cooperate or not. Thank you

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher 66

PS I should hope you appreciate this heads up and appreciate the opportunity to prove where you stand in service of the Canadian people regarding these most serious issues.

.

67

November 13, 2007 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick,On L4P 2P8

68

Dear Canadian Bar Association Representatives I am just an ordinary citizen of Canada, perhaps a little less passive and a little more conviction towards the acquisition of justice as I have been on the trail 24/7 since June 30 2005 with it nowhere in site here in Ontario. I have looked under every rock and found nothing but snakes, venomous for sure and I was just wondering if they are spread throughout Canada. My main concern is to whether or not the Canadian individual is actually guaranteed Charter Rights as provided in The Constitution Act, 1982 or perhaps something you can rent when needed and can afford them or is there perhaps a way of purchasing them out right or can you only rent them if you have an excellent credit rating. If a crook cleans you out is your acquisition to justice negated for being so stupid or is it the governments fault for not getting the message to me that there are bad people running around the country? Well let me get to the point I have accomplished nothing in the line of justice here in Ontario and in fact the evidence I have collected along the way proves irrefutably it is impossible to achieve the justice as stated and implied in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for quite obvious reason which the Law Society of Upper Canada related to me in a completely different matter than the one I an providing you today. They are quite adamant their members do not give a damn about the individual¶s guaranteed Charter Rights which makes it quite difficult for me to discern how it would be possible for the individual to achieve justice consistent with the supreme law of Canada, with their members have infested the legal system.

I am requesting you review the attachments and study the referenced evidence responding FFF. Should you find anything that seems not particularly right in your understanding of The Law take appropriate action to address the issues. You will read that I do not have confidence in the government personnel due their indifference to the issues I have addressed them where my analysis of the evidence proves irrefutably government personnel are engaged in a conspiracy against the Canadian people whereby the individual who is guaranteed Charter rights hasn¶t a hope in hell accessing them alone and hasn¶t a hope in hell organizing the people to stand together to assert their rights. Of course if I was gay I would have a membership to contend with. In any case I would like you to review the actions taken by the Law Society of Upper Canada against the particular lawyer referenced within the said file and take action where it is due in your professional opinions.

69

I am sending this to Canadian Bar Association Representatives across the country and I presume the significance of the serious nature of the issues will be readily apparent to you. I would appreciate very much if you each addressed the issues in an independent manner and studied the evidence as if you each were the individual looking for justice. In other words put yourself in my shoes using your intelligent heads to determine if you would be getting a fair shake under the law and if not set out a course of action as to how you would address it. I do not expect you to respond to me nor do I expect you to act on my behalf. I was hoping perchance once you have all completed addressing your analysis of the evidence and identified the or any inadequacies as per your individual departments perception of The Law, the Constitution that is accumulate them to one department and distribute the whole 15 to each department simultaneously for analysis for the purpose of restructuring a Legal System conducive to and consistent with the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights which believe it or not is a significant concern to them even if they are not aware. Surely there can be no doubt it is time for significant change to the Legal System and perhaps it will be more apparent if you should take on this endeavour independently and then together as suggested or in some manner more suitable to your intelligence obviously having a broader oversight than I could possibly have although I do have a particular view perchance you have not yet chanced upon and I highly suspect no more desire to than I. However having done so why not take advantage of putting your minds together to compare apples against apples or oranges against oranges as you prefer. Just a thought as they persistently pop up without a thought as to what to do with them. I would appreciate it if someone would forward this information on to Mr. Gary H. Pon up there in Nunavut because it just has become too costly to fax for me. It has also occurred to me he may be lonely up there and glad to here from us in the south. Perhaps he may suggest if we just all went ice fishing we would all keep out of trouble. Thank you

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher PS I would appreciate however knowing if you see the necessity to address the issues in some manner.

70

71

October 5 2008 Commissioner Conflict of Interest & Ethics Mary Elizabeth Dawson Re: Government Organized Crime Federal Accountability Act, 2006

Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick, on L4P 2P8 www.cdf.name Manager Charter Democracy Force

BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ploy Dear Commissioner Over the passed year I have sent you a preponderance of evidence requesting you investigate certain personnel for conflict of interest & ethics By your refusal to deal with these issues irrefutably proves the Accountability Act, 2006, which your office was created is a pressure diffusion and squelch chamber initiated by the office of the Minister of Justice and PMO. This is their Modus Operandi when pressure is put on them to abide by the Constitution consistent with every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights, which the Parliament of Canada enacted and passed on the responsibility to the provinces to administer and enforce, purportedly without retaining some form of compelling the provinces to do so. A letter from the DOJ dated January 22 2007 signed by Brisbois clearly states they have no authority over the provinces as they have autonomy. This is obviously not true or the RCMP would not have been investing my complaint filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP dated November 8 2007 against 2 RCMP refusing to investigate Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy in Ontario. If they had no jurisdiction why did they spend a year investigating the evidence when all they had to say was not our jurisdiction? .The Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day is responsible to Parliament and to the public for the RCMP and the RCMP Commissioner is a Deputy Minister of the federal government and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General advises them along with every other government department and agencies including all Ministers. The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 irrefutably proves the RCMP upper echelon are in on the conspiracy and there is further evidence published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-ofdisposition proving many more refuse to investigate the irrefutable evidence of government Organized Crime.

72

All the evidence I previously provided you is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.charterdemocracyforce.ca and affiliate sites referenced thereon. On the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site there is now irrefutable evidence the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and others of the RCMP are in on the Government Organized Crime along with the Minister of Justice and Attorney General and the Ontario Attorney General. The Attorney General of Ontario is responsible as ³guardian of the public interest´ to demonstrate due diligence consistent with Constitution conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and the evidence shows he never intended to and refuses to do so. I have requested the RCMP to charge him and they have refused to do so. The evidence is self explanatory and as there are many others yet to deal with I request you thoroughly study the evidence to coherency consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights for the purpose of charging the aforementioned and referred to RCMP for conflict of interest and ethics with the understanding further charges will be made. Urgency is of the essence and I expect a response acknowledging receipt of this document promptly ³ConflictInterestCompiledOctober52008´ which is published on the aforementioned RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site. Thank you Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force

73

74

August 24, 2007 Dear Gisèle Bellehumeur Please confirm that you have received copies of the following documents Letter to Toronto Sun Law Society of Upper Canada Rick Hennessey ORHT Dave Grech MMAH Hon. John Garretson Ombudsman Julia Munro Premier Dalton McGuinty Attorney General Michael Bryant OPP Randy Craig YRP Bruce Herridge OCCOPS Sheldon Prior Judy Phillips Title Date October 8 2006 February 10 2007 March 30 2007 # of pages 73 36 11 7 10 18 6 5 14 38 22 9 12 18 1 1 4 4 3 9 3 1 1 7 12

Lawyer File #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Robert McCreary Crown Attorney #13 Paul Culver Crown Attorney #13A Michael Thomson RCMP #14 Hon. John Garretsen Michael Bryant In the spirit as well as the letter Prime Minister Stephen Harper Prime Minister Stephen Harper Accountability Act«.Jesus takes Prime Minister Stephen Harper Constitution Act, 1867 Prime Minister Stephen Harper Dear Prime Minister Ministry of Community Safety Julia Munro

«

March 30 2007 April 1 2007 April 5 2007 April 5 2007 April 7 2007 June 20 2007 July 9 2007 July 15 2007 July 17 2007 July 19 2007 July 19 2007 August 15 2007 August 21 2007

It is imperative that you study the evidence provided in the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006 until you are coherent to the fact that Don Wilson did commit the crimes as I allege. I have a copy of the recording of the Tribunal hearing TNL-67103 where Don Wilson denies having ever seen or signed the May 6 2005 and April 13 2005 agreements which are addendums to my purchase agreement for shares in Bio Safe. You will note the signatures on these two agreements are quite similar but not the signature he normally uses as on my purchase agreement, Midge¶s share certificate and of course his fabricated dispute which he filed with the ORHT.

75

You will note that his first name ³Don´ appears to be the same on all the documents with a very large ³D´ but on the agreements which he had denied ever seeing or signing his last name is just a scribble and his true signature is quite legibly ³Wilson´ as per his dispute. In Lawyer File # 2 you will see Dave Grech¶s response to me dated September 6 2005 (pages 4 and 5) which is completely incoherent to the evidence which he bases his decision not to commence or cause to commence proceedings against Don Wilson. You can tell he is obviously confused but he refused to respond to my many attempts to make him aware of the facts. Thank you, Frank Gallagher

December 31 2007 Mary Elizabeth Dawson Commissioner Conflict of Interest and Ethics Re: Complaint against RCMP Commissioner William Elliot

76

77

While we rely on our alliances with private sector businesses the Canadian public expects us to ensure that public funds are spent efficiently in the public¶s best interest. RCMP ethical standards are based on 6 core values: Integrity, honesty, professionalism, compassion, respect and accountability. Common sense in judgment and values at the core of behavior and held accountable. public funds are spent efficiently in the public¶s best interest. Government corruption and conspiracy would be priority number one in this category. All the time and money wasted covering up the issues of obvious government conspiracy beginning with the ORHT and continuity throughout the government and York Regional Police and OPP Anti-Rackets is far from the public¶s best interest and in fact completely adverse being in the best interests of the conspirators and the fact the evidence irrefutably proves the government doesn¶t give a damn about the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights which is not only evidenced on my web site but the extreme difference in government wages and benefits compared to the private sector¶s is a major concern relative to the publics best interests especially since the private sector works harder and longer for less. Approximately 2 months ago there was a report on television revealing these statistics which are obvious anyway but I am quite sure that was taken off the air due to government interference. I scanned news after news for a couple days after but I could not find it. The government waste a lot of time and money covering up things and creating new Commissions for this and that purportedly to deal with the issues as they advertise them but when you attempt to use them they are without jurisdiction, authority, competency, responsibility, fortitude and conviction and absolutely none of the RCMP 6 core values: Integrity, honesty, professionalism, compassion, respect and accountability. I am not referring to the hired help of course but those people who are in responsible positions, who don¶t understand the meaning of the word relative to the people¶s best interests whereas the most important possession one has is his or her guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits before and under the law. My evidence was collected during normal course of existence where I had the unfortunate experience of necessity dealing with issues which needed the help of the government services only to find out their ineptness to do that which is required of them in a sane manner dealing with the immoral of society. They have proven to be quite competent in keeping me from the justice expected of a competent system which has guaranteed equality to every individual in protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law and have proven irrefutably the system is designed to rob the moral majority and cover each others back all done under the cover of darkness, cloak of secrecy which will not go unnoticed, when I get this evidence to the general public very soon in the New Year. Maintaining the trust the people have placed in you does not mean cover up everything so it does not get to the public which you clearly do not comprehend or I should say being in on the conspiracy you do most emphatically understand as the evidence shows and both of these two scenarios results in the same thing not in the best interest of the public.. 78

Conflict of Interest The evidence shows all you people of the government personnel I have provided the evidence to are in conflict of interest of the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights which the Federal Government granted by the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 which I have also provided to the Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics Mary Elizabeth Dawson who was appointed under the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 I find it incomprehensible that Mary does not consider Government Corruption and Conspiracy unethical and in Conflict of Interest relative to the law and the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. Once you get the gist of it all it is quite apparent that Government Corruption and Conspiracy is the norm and expected of their personnel and Mary¶s job is to diffuse the complaints. In fact the whole system is designed to wear complainers out and I would imagine the majority give up realizing they are seemingly impenetrable. The whole system begins to backfire under persistent determination to get the justice demanded by law as you are all aware as the evidence irrefutably shows. The evidence long ago warranted a PUBLIC INQUIRY but loyalty remained to themselves, their careers and above all their pensions, which demanded their loyalty to the conspiracy. They are all well educated and experienced and know full well the issues I have raised are very serious in nature being humongously detrimental to the people¶s best interests and their guaranteed Charter rights. I do not expect any one of you to be capable of handling the issues yourself but I do expect you to bring them forward to a PUBLIC INQUIRY which is the only viable approach due the circumstances. By not doing so and keeping it under wraps you are aiding and abetting the conspirators in direct defiance of the law detrimental to the individual of the moral majority and society as a whole for financial benefit. You all know full well that the evidence warrants looking into and you have consulted with others and get your final advice from the ring leaders of the conspiracy or their cohorts, which you feel relieves you of any liability or responsibility but who in their right mind would accept such absurdity being advised by the alleged conspirators. Oh I am sure you see that as sane in your world but out here in the real world it is absolutely insane and this is the world where you will be tried in and there will be significant punishment to introduce moral sanity to the government. Their has not been one iota of interest from any one of you to run with these most serious issues and you all know full well that the responsibility comes down to each and everyone of you in turn whereas you know everyone else has refused to accept their responsibility. Each one of you down the line of command had the power of authority of the law as your superiors failed to accept their responsibilities being inconsistent to the support of the guarantee vital to the well being and safety of the Canadian people being criminal denouncing their authority making each one of you in turn legitimately in command and therefore responsible and will be held accountable. Think hard because opportunity is running out. I am sure you know it. 79

ATTENTION Mary Elizabeth Dawson Commissioner of Conflict of Interest and Ethics If you have been attentive and coherent to the aforesaid and the documents I have been e-mailing your office to no avail I now draw your attention to RCMP Commissioner William Elliot. On November 8 2007 I filed a complaint with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP against two members of the RCMP for refusing to investigate government corruption and conspiracy, evidence published on my web sites which I have provided as it surfaced to the RCMP since January 2006. I highly suspect the decision not to investigate came from the upper command and quite probably Commissioner Elliot has been apprised of it. On the same day November 8 2007 the Commission mailed the complaint to the Commissioner and mailed me a copy along with a cover page. (Copy attached) I received acknowledgment of receipt from the RCMP Professional Standards Unit dated December 16 2007. This is done under the auspices of the RCMP Act and according to the November 8 2007 letter from the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP he is required to provide me with a status report every 30 days thereafter. That means I should have received his first status report on December 16 2007 and with today being December 31 2007 and not received it William Elliot is obvious in non compliance of the RCMP Act. I have no doubt William Elliot, Stockwell Day, Robert Nicholson and Prime Minister Stephen Harper have somewhat of a quandary on their hands. Harper, Nicholson and Day would be reluctant to let Elliot go ahead and investigate them for their significant roles in the conspiracy and Elliot knows where his bread comes from and with the evidence not being trivia, frivolous or vexatious and most convincing of the government corruption being published on my web site waiting for his response they do have a full plate to get out of this one. Oh, I have full confidence in them and they will orchestrate a plan which is their forte but every step of the way will be closely scrutinized wouldn¶t you think. I mean here we have it all front and centre for them to show us what they got implicating everyone involved along the way. Anyway I don¶t believe in giving immorality an over extended fair chance to recoup although I am keen on providing enough rope. It¶s now time to reel them in or at least put some reasonable pressure on them. This document of course will be published on my web site by the time you read this in an effort to alleviate me of some pressure and at least point the finger in case of any foreseeable occurrence. Yes the nature of this is very serious and I suggest you start dealing with it in the manner it deserves. 80

I would say this is a matter of the well being and public safety of an individual I have come to know. I reiterate RCMP Commissioner William Elliot is in non compliance with the RCMP Act rather minor in the whole scheme of things but it is a place to commence to blow the whole thing wide open wouldn¶t you think? I request you to investigate the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot for Conflict of Interest namely for not acting in the best interest of the people by performing his duty in a manner consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equality in protection and benefits in all matters before and under the law whereas he is responsible to investigate the complaint against the two members of the RCMP for refusing to investigate the government corruption and conspiracy and the only way to determine if they had a right to refuse the evidence as invalid is to study it and if he is competent, responsible and irreproachable as required to be able to support the guarantee of the Charter equally to every individual he must find the evidence is far beyond any reasonable doubt of the government corruption and conspiracy which he will have no legitimate reason to not find his RCMP members guilty as charged but then they have obviously acted upon the authority of upper command which could probably have been him which just goes round and round and out to Stockwell Day who is William Elliot¶s superior and the evidence clearly shows his efforts at diverting the issues and so on like that. You know very well what I mean and you know where it¶s all headed and this is your opportunity to just do your job and distance yourself from the conspirators. Once again I remind you of the absurdity to state you consulted with the alleged conspirators and were advised not to proceed. Each person is responsible for their own destiny which is readily understood but you people have a very special responsibility for the well being and safety of the people who finance you and upon acceptance of benefit for that purpose the contract is binding. Live up to it or live down to it. Ultimately we are back to your responsibility to yourself. Round and round where it stops everybody knows. Of course, with yourself. I have attached document ³Commission RCMP Complaints Dec. 27 2007´ published on my web site which contains the pertinent evidence. The November 8 letter from the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP and the November 16 2007 from the Professional Standards Unit. I have also attached document ³This column was published«««Sept 13 2000´ which is relevant. All the evidence on my web site is relevant as to the conspiracy and RCMP Commissioner William Elliot is aware and required to be coherent to it in addressing his complaint and it is relevant as to why he has not provided me the 30 day status report. I expect you June 6 2008 to deal with this matter FFF Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith in case you have forgotten.
To: Mary Elizabeth Dawson that this matter has nothing to do with your jurisdiction I will expect a full Should you be of the opinion Commissioner explanation as to why not and a copy of the letter you forward the matter to who will ultimately end up Conflict bag unless holding the of Interest that person notifies me as to whom they passed the buck to. Re: Charges of Conflict of Interest against

Do you see what I mean?

I remind you the games are over, it¶s been fun, schools out, grab a slice of reality. The Parliament of Canada A responsible person in you position would not just shrug off a conspiracy stating it has nothing to do with you, because you are informed and it is far more thanwww.cdf.name a moral responsibility. Prime Minister Stephen Harper
[email protected] Office my web address should You have of the Prime Minister you care to review the evidence and I highly recommend you show an M. Bredeson initiative to actually deal with that which is in the publics best interest and of course let us not forget your Executive Correspondence Officer own.

Federal Government and Personnel

Frank Gallagher

for the Prime Minister's Office

81 PS I have forwarded copy to Federal Ombudsman Victim of Crimes Re: Commissioner RCMP

Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada J. Brisebois Manager Ministerial Correspondence Unit Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson Former Minister of Justice Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day Dear Commissioner Mary Elizabeth Dawson I have provided you a series of e-mails requesting you investigate the Federal Government personnel listed above for Conflict of Interest I have both e-mailed evidence to you and provided you with the original web site address of the Charter Democracy Force http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force, the new web site address of the Charter Democracy Force www.cdf.name and the CDF Documents web site, where the irrefutable evidence is published and or referenced, but you have not yet informed me as to the status of your investigation. I request once again that you investigate the Federal Government personnel listed above for Conflict of Interest All of the accused have been provided the aforementioned evidence and the web site addresses As you are aware the RCMP Commissioner has been charged with the responsibility to study the evidence on the sites under the RCMP Act due me filing with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP on November 8 2007 for refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy. On April 21 2008 I was informed I would be receiving the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition within 30 days but due to circumstances RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam who had been assigned to the case informed me by Interim Report May 20 2008 that it would be delayed by a few days which I am still waiting for. This Final Letter of Disposition will be posted on the web sites and I will notify you when it comes providing the path to it. I expect it will decline an investigation because the evidence shows the RCMP Commissioner is involved with the conspiracy and I offer you that so you you don¶t use their decision to get you off the hook of investing the above personnel for Conflict of Interest

Evidence published or referenced on the following links
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force

http://groups.google.com/group/the-cdf-documents www.charterdemocracyforce.ca

The evidence shows the Government Office¶s were corrupted prior to the political Ministers being appointed and they have just carried on as per tradition.. There is a prodigious amount of evidence published on the various web sites to read which is all relevant but I draw your attention to the following. Constitution Act, 1982

82

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The major concern is the Federal Government has failed to demonstrate due diligence to the structuring of the legal system consistence with the Constitution conducive to the support of the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights but have convincingly demonstrated the system is designed for the profiteering of the members of the Law Societies where victims who became victims due to their negligence to put a competent system in place capable of supporting every individuals equal rights of protection and benefits before and under the law are further victimized by the members of the law societies who charge extravagant rates to support their luxurious lifestyles. This is contrary to the Charter being discriminatory in many ways. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The taxpayer pays for the defence of the majority of the criminal element who due their nature are not likely to pay their fair share of taxes and are often not very well off financially which is inherent to the system as they are entitled to lawyers provided by the government whereas the taxpayer generally has to pay for his or her own legal counsel. In such a system the wealthy have a humongous advantage over the not so well off and the big corporate conglomerates weighing everything in dollar and cents have many lawyers as they plan their modus operandi based on the likelihood of an individual challenging them in court being limited in funds and due the incompetence of the system weighted in the corporations favour generally are never challenged being too costly and just too damn much trouble to go through the legal system to be recompensed. This is a phenomenon not limited to corporations because it is just simply too much trouble to go after someone for a $50 bad cheque for example which encourages such illegal actions, which I have offered as evidence relative to the criminally fraudulent actions perpetrated against me. On pages 13 and 14 of Lawyer File # 11 published on the the CDF Documents web site

http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force/web/the-cdf-documents is a letter from Rod Bradbury of EcoSafe who I had asked if he was the Vice-President of BioSafe which the president sold me shares providing a prospectus shown on page 12 of Lawyer File # 11. He responded that he never was and he had written off around $1000 that he was still owed as a business experience. The significance of this is the criminal element are aware of this weakness in the system and they flourish creating a humongous number of victims who go unrecorded in the statistics compromising the individuals guaranteed rights of protection. Then when this same person commits fraud over $100,000 at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal part of the Ontario legal system, financed by the taxpayer to administer and enforce law consistent with the Constitution, witnessed and recorded by the judicator the ORHT refuse to file charges in this matter and another of filing false and misleading information an offense under section 206(2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997. This is absurd allowing such occurrences clearly demonstrating they have no interest in supporting the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of protection where punishment is the

83

first line of defence attentive to deterrence where justice is difficult to be recompensed if at all after becoming victimized. I reiterate the system is designed for the profit of the members of the Law Societies applying no deterrence allowing the immoral to flourish providing the lawyers a luxurious lifestyle attending to the symptoms rather than nipping criminal inclination in the bud. It is absolutely incomprehensible that when they have the criminal dead to rights committed right in the court they let him go where most often is the case it is difficult to catch them and they have committed many crimes before they are caught leaving many victims in their wake. As pathetic as they are it is absurd that they would go to so much trouble fighting me off trying to get the justice due me in accordance with the Constitution in support of the rights of protection of every individual provided by the Charter. Now if that is not bad enough they tampered with the recording removing pertinent evidence and on the second day of the hearing the judicator announced they would not be recording it. From there it just continues into absurdity more detailed in the Mad Glad mostly Sad«Why? document published on the same web site. The entire Ontario Government obstructed justice and aided and abetted the criminal. The evidence irrefutably proves the Ontario Government refuse to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights which is the responsibility of the Ontario Attorney General as stated in the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ as published on the Ontario web site. http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/ag/agrole.asp It clearly states he is the Guardian of the Public Interest and also the Guardian of the rule of law, which brings us to another serious matter. The very first line of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law The ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ defines it as that most elusive concept, a well established legal principle, hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole.. Obviously not competent to protect the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights but is conducive to the luxurious money making ploy of the members of the Law Societies. Notably there is no entry in the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ of the Charter convincingly suggesting they never intended to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights although they would never admit it but inadvertently have done so persistently throughout all the evidence published on the web. ************************************************************************

84

That brings us to the federal government where it is the responsibility of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada as the government chief legal advisor to advise all the government departments and agencies. This is stated in the DOJ letter dated January 22 2007 published on the Charter Democracy Force site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force on page 23 of the Government
Correspondence compiled September 1 2007 J. Brisebois goes on to state the Parliament of Canada is responsible for enacting federal law while administering those laws is a federal responsibility. So obviously it is the responsibility of the Ontario Attorney General to administer those laws which is confirmed in the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ So whose responsibility is it to see that the Attorney General lives up to his responsibilities? The aforementioned link to the Government Correspondence clearly shows the Premier Dalton McGuinty and my MPP Julia Munro do not consider it theirs. Ultimately it is the responsibility of the federal government who made the guarantee who purportedly never made any arrangements to assure the provinces supported it. This suggests once again they never intended to support the Charter guarantee to every individual. So either they are required to support the guarantee they made under common law or they have deliberately intended to misrepresent the fact that the people had guaranteed Charter rights while in fact they do not as they do not as they obviously do not enforce it. All the evidence shows they never intended to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and yet they are forever making comments on our Charter rights. What was the point of guaranteeing all the rights if they never intended to back them´ Well, does not matter because the Constitution is the supreme law of Canada and they are obliged to abide by it and enforce it. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. To be responsible the Attorney Generals must be competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the support of the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights which obviously they are not as irrefutably proven in the published documents. What they are though is unscrupulous deceptive prevaricators, which is consistently proven throughout the documents. They are members of the Law Society of Upper Canada who have adamantly stated or implied their members are not required to give a damn about the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights in the 2 Part Law Society of Upper Canada document. Now published as http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273017/law-society-february-10-2007

85

The Law Society also claim their members are not required to validate their clients charges against the alleged before commencing proceedings which caused me undue hardship and frustration illegally putting me in a position where I would require a lawyer to defend my position which of course I decided not to do given the possibility of receiving justice as the evidence shows is impossible where members of the Law Society hold every position of authority in the legal system and why the majority of people just write it off as a lost cause. Then the Society goes on to state they are not required to look at the supporting evidence of a complaint I filed against one of their members as obviously the decision is made he is innocent before the complaint is filed. This consistency is obvious throughout the prodigious number of documents published on the web sites.

There is much more to say about the Ontario Government but that is not in your jurisdiction but it is available for you to read to see what happens when the federal government refuses to back the guarantee they made to every Canadian individual.

The Accountability Act, 2006
Where common sense prevails a guarantee or law not enforced is not guaranteed or law if the persons responsible are not held accountable and made responsible. Obviously the provisions to every individual as guaranteed by the Charter require competent responsible irreproachable government personnel with fortitude and conviction to the endeavour and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is required to be responsible for federal constitutional matters and the Ontario Attorney General is responsible fro the province of Ontario constitutional matters clearly stated in the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ and the aforementioned letter from the DOJ dated January 22 2007.

So why would we need the Accountability Act, 2006 enacted by Prime Minister Stephen Harper with the aid of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada?
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Vic Toews were both provided the evidence prior to the enactment of the Accountability Act and could have had some influence as to why it was enacted. There are at least two ways of reasoning why it was enacted. 1) An attempt to cover up the incompetent irresponsible reproachable DOJ, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada who advises all the government departments and agencies and responsible for ineptness of the federal legal system to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. 2) They never intended to back the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights Either one would be difficult to explain to the people. The book by British Columbia history professor Jonathan Swainger makes reference to a book by Edmund Morgan who asserts the success of any form of government is dependent on their ability to deceive the people and in a democracy it is necessary for the people to believe they have a voice and the representatives are the people for the people.. http://books.google.com/books?id=eRHTr2TCBMwC&pg=PA19&dq=roles+and+responsibilities+of+the +attorney+general+canada&sig=hi6yCnnxTgLu6Qjx9yJS2U80xG4#PPA19,M1

86

It also mentions something about not being caught or the government would collapse, no different than any syndicated organized crime where it is forever necessary to deceive the people for continued success. Their can be no doubt this is a premeditated government internal problem that an individual could not possible taken on by oneself which of course is the reason for its success and yet invariably they tell me with tongue in cheek that I should get a lawyer and I could argue it out until I went bankrupt or the government did.

So do we have guaranteed Charter rights or not? Yes and no The Constitution: Document is the supreme law of Canada signed by the authorities in power at the time even though they were obviously unscrupulous as the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ attests as it defines that most elusive concept ±the rule of law- a well established legal principle, hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole.
The people are guaranteed their Charter rights no matter what they intended because it is hardly likely they are going to come forward and say it was all just a big joke, so yes we are legitimately guaranteed Charter rights. But no, at present we do not have guaranteed Charter rights by the governments¶ refusal to support them. They got a lot of splainin to do and a PUBLIC INQUIRY is the only viable option.. The rule of law is not competent to support a democratic form of government let alone a charter democracy and they knew it when they entered it into the Charter being at the least criminally fraudulent.

Democracy
Social equality, equality, egalitarianism

Egalitarianism
Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Justice
Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
It is the incompetence of the rule of law that deprives society of justice, the tax payers an exorbitant amount to fund the system and the great rip offs by the lawyers who are provided free to the criminal element who can not afford one which in itself is not constitutional with the innocent tax payer having to provide for his or her own lawyer who get into inane long debates due the incompetence of the system which severely compromises the individuals guaranteed Charter rights and equal benefits. A fairly recent study within the past year showed government personnel were far better paid with much better benefits than the people in the private sector who not only contributed to their benefits, but can not afford to provide them for themselves.

87

Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day proved his involvement in the conspiracy very well where a copy of his e-mail to me is enclosed in the Stockwell Day November 3 2007 document.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9838279/Stockwell-Day-November-3-and-5-2007
He demonstrated how they deal with serious issues when the DOJ is linked to a crime as in the RCMP Pension fund scandal. When evidence linked the DOJ to the pension fund scandal and a Public Inquiry was warranted Stockwell intervened stating it would just waste a lot of taxpayers¶ money and a Task Force was the way to go. When the Task Force Report came in there was no mention of the DOJ. Imagine that!!!! What can you expect of professionally trained charlatans of deception and prevarication, which is prominent throughout the evidence? You have been provided a prodigious amount of evidence which irrefutably proves the government is organized crime personified of corruption and conspiracy against the individual¶s of the Lower Tier which in itself is not constitutional. Do your job and make things right. Public Inquiry demanded. Frank Gallagher PS Please acknowledge immediately your intention to review the evidence or not. One more thing. See page 9 Yesterday I was watching CPAC which provides a great example of the incompetence and injustice of the government

88

June 5 2008 Today at about 9 AM I was watching a rerun of the May 27 2008 Committee on Aboriginal funding per child being significantly different from that which is allotted for the provinces children. The Auditor General could not comment as a matter of policy and the Senators did not have a clue as to how to deal with this most serious matter being indicative of that which the evidence irrefutably proves on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.charterdemocracyforce.ca This is clearly an issue of the incompetence of the government to support every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equality of protection and benefits where there is not a competent responsible irreproachable system of fortitude and conviction to the support of the provisions of the Charter guarantee to every individual. Obviously these people are of the Lower Tier as I and the majority of the populace and due the deliberate incompetence of the DOJ to structure a system consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of every individual these people have been deliberately neglected in so many ways to a disgraceful level of impoverishment giving them no alternative but to seek other avenues to escape the hopeless and despair in an effort to find a better way of life adding to the burden upon society and the safety and wellbeing of every individual is compromised as is the case where ever such atrocities are allowed to prevail. They turn to alcohol and drugs nourishing the drug trade and obviously the money has to come from some where of a nefarious nature, not only compromising the safety and wellbeing of the moral majority but increase the burden on taxpayers providing their defence and the necessity of funding the legal system to deal with them where the money would be well spent dealing with the situation head on at the root of the problem preventing the predictable saving victims from undo hardships rather than providing one more avenue for the members of the Law Society to feast off. This is a disgrace and just further evidence of the irresponsible government personnel who are deliberately made so feeling they are obliged to follow customs and policies set out by the federal government, where they are designed to obstruct the support of the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights where the support should be Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith to the support. This as well as the issues addressed on the www.charterdemocracyforce.ca site and others referenced thereon consistently prove the deliberate incompetence and refusal of the federal government to back the guarantee they made to every individual equally with the enactment of the Constitution in 1982 where every initiative is intent on covering up their conspiracy that they never intended to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights in the first place being immediately apparent in the first line of the Charter ³Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law´ Whereas the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ published on the Ontario web site defines: 89

That most elusive concept ± the rule of law- a well established legal principle, hard to easily define being the rule of law that protects the individual and society as a whole. The rule of law is obviously impossible to protect the people as guaranteed or as either stated or implied by the definition of the word democracy, which they adamantly proclaim to be the form of government they administer and enforce in Canada. A Public Inquiry is warranted on the aboriginal issues and those previously presented where a ³Final Letter of Disposition´ from the RCMP Commissioner is presently due as to the validity of the evidence and quite probably has been delayed as they attempt to orchestrate their way out as is their forte embedded in their M.O. Frank Gallagher

90

____________________________________________ From: Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner/Commissariat aux conflits d'intérêts et à l'éthique [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: June 4, 2008 8:23 AM To: Frank Gallagher Subject: Read: Efforts to understanding Your message [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; LeBlanc, Dominic député; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner/Commissariat aux conflits d'intérêts et à l'éthique; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Ambrose, Rona M.P.; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Atkins, Norman; Angus, David; Bernier, Maxime - Député; Baird, John - M.P.; [email protected]; [email protected]; Blackburn, Jean-Pierre - Député; Bacon, Lise; Biron, Michel; Baker, George; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Bellehumeur, Gisèle; [email protected]; Clement, Tony - M.P.; Cannon, Lawrence - Député; [email protected]; [email protected]; Poilievre, Pierre - M.P.; [email protected]; Ritz, Gerry M.P.; [email protected]; [email protected]; Rompkey, William; Ringuette, Pierrette; Russell, Marie; Rokosh, Gillian; Ratte, Lise; [email protected]; Skelton, Carol - M.P.; [email protected]; [email protected]; Strahl, Chuck - M.P.; Solberg, Monte - M.P.; Smith, David; Smith, Carol; Sibbeston, Nick; Spivak, Mira; St. Germain, Gerry; Stollery, Peter; Stratton, Terrance R.; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Sweet, David - M.P.; [email protected]; [email protected]; Toews, Vic - M.P.; Thompson, Greg - M.P.; Tardif, Claudette; Tkachuk, David; [email protected]; Verner, Josée - Députée; [email protected]; Van Loan, Peter - Riding 1; Van Loan, Peter - Assistant 1; [email protected]; [email protected]; Watt, Charlie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Williams, John - M.P.; Wrzesnewskyj, Borys - M.P.; Zimmer, Rod; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

91

[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Efforts to understanding Sent: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:41:47 -0400 was read on Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:22:52 -0400

No response to date July 13 2009

92

October 29 2008 I see you have been on the watch since 1993 making Canada one of the leading Democracies. We do not resemble a democracy at all within the definitions and in fact are a Capitalist Pigs Democracy«Oxymoron, as the evidence irrefutably attests on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and affiliate sites referenced thereon

Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine,
principle

Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination,
incomparability, dominance Democracy: Social equality, equality, egalitarianism.....Egalitarianism: Parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality

Justice: Fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even-handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
Your information in Law Suit #2 supports the fact that money talks with Lobbyist influencing the government¶s decisions as the rich continue to get richer and the poor continue to get poorer. Law Suit # 3: The Mulroney/Schreiber scandal is a good example of this type of thing that goes on all the time where seldom are they caught but even when they do they come out smelling like roses because the system is fixed to protect the members of the Law Societies and government as did the Ethics and Conflict of Interest Commissioner Mary Elizabeth Dawson which I will get back to. I am not up on the details how Mulroney managed to sue us innocent taxpayers for $2,000,000 but I understand he never claimed $300,000 from Schreiber on his taxes for 8 years until it appeared it was going to catch up to him. I think the figure later changed to $225,000 but what are you going to believe with all the corruption and orchestrating of the legal system to protect these criminals. If a person from the public sector was caught they would be up for tax evasion. That is how they got Al Capone I believe. The difference is desire to take the criminals out of action in the public sector but protect them in the government organized crime personified, and meanwhile it is taxpayers money they are using to do so. The ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ published on the Ontario web site today was obviously published prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution as there is no reference to the Charter. It does state the Attorney General is responsible for all constitutional matters, the legitimacy of laws enacted through the Cabinet and is responsible as ³guardian of the public interest´ and ³guardian of the rule of law´ He advises all the Ministers, government departments and so called independent agencies such as the Ombudsman but they publish on the Ombudsman web site they are there to deal with government improprieties but the Ombudsman document and lawyer File # 4 published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site tells a different story. Truly incompetent with limited authority and obviously protects the government and the Attorney General as he is their advisor. 93

I reiterate the entire government is set up that way as the 2 part Law society of Upper Canada document demonstrates where the Society adamantly admit, either stated or implied that their members are not required to give a damn about every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and their only obligation is to vigorously advance the interests of their clients. They go further to state that evidence is irrelevant when against one of their members and this is indicative throughout the entire government, well documented. The Ontario Attorney General administers the Law society Act and is a member but he is not accountable to them under disciplinary measures. He refused to deal with the Law Society on this matter and I suspect he advised them on those particular issues of the complaint I made against their member.

The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use" Note: principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, which means the Constitution and all laws must be consistent with it or they are of no force or effect as to their inconsistencies. The ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ refers to that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole. So we can see that they admit it is a long established legal principle but they find it an elusive concept and hard to easily define, which is absurd if the professionals cannot get a handle on it. The ambiguity is deliberately placed. At any time the Attorney General could have cleared that up but that would not be conducive to the luxurious lifestyle they have come to enjoy with long dragged out cases costing the taxpayer humongous amounts of money simply because they allow ambiguities to exist in the interpretations permitting them to go which ever direction they like with justice impossible whereas the lawyers fees cut into what the victim is entitled which gets into another kettle of fish dealing with insurance companies. There policies should be standardized with no small print where this absurdity only provides work for the members of the legal profession, which is how the entire system is designed for profit by the legal profession absolutely indifferent to the public interest and justice, which is not obtainable administered by the profession whose only concerns are for money, devoid of democratic principles. Immediately we can see they fit into the ideological abuse category with the rule of law meaningless under their administration.

94

I have presumed it is Parliament of Canada who authored and authorized the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ as a letter dated January 22 2007 from the DOJ responding to the evidence I provided them of the Ontario Attorney General¶s failure to put a modus operandi in place consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Brisbois I believe off hand was the fellow who signed it on behalf of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada informing me that Parliament enacts federal laws (Constitution) but it is the responsibility of the provinces to administer them. Of course that has been my complaint that the Ontario Attorney General refuses to support the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and this was publicly confirmed in the Saturday Toronto Star July 26 2008 where Attorney General Chris Bentley along with prominent judges stated that there is a serious problem with the legal system as the Middle Class cannot afford to access the system. Nothing has changed since the introduction of the Legal Aid Act in 1967 where the same problem was evident then being obviously not democratic and never attended to. The only thing democratic that I have observed is the right to vote, but of what use is that when all parties are not democratic? I have provided them all the evidence with no response. It is prudent to mention that I have been providing the Toronto Star, the office of the Ontario Attorney General, the DOJ, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada including a prodigious number of other prominent government personnel the irrefutable evidence that the governments were illegitimate and inconsistent with the Constitution, not conducive to the support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits since long before Stephen Harper was first elected into power as Prime Minister. The July 26 2008 Toronto Star item on Legal Aid demonstrates how the media and the government, Attorney General Chris Bentley befuddle the populous suggesting they have done nothing illegal, but they have just come to realize the Middle Class are not being protected and they are addressing the problem. Of course that will require more tax money as the lawyers will need a raise, and the people will remain unprotected. I suspect the evidence had a significant influence in Harper¶s enactment of the federal Accountability Act, 2006, which is just an attempt to cover up the deliberate refusal of the governments to apply due diligence to the support of every individual¶s Charter rights where the evidence shows their modus operandi is precisely adverse to their constitutional responsibilities allowing the criminal element to flourish and thus the business of they in the legal profession both private and public sector. So I have to wonder just what Democracy you are watching as it was Democracy in name only that has always catered to the affluent and influential who scratch each other¶s backs in an attempt to satiate their insatiable lust for wealth and power. With the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 Canada became officially a Charter Democracy requiring the government to restructure the legal system with competent responsible irreproachable government personnel with fortitude and conviction to exemplary support of every individual¶s guaranteed democratic Charter rights of equal protection and benefit but obviously they had no intention as the evidence is abundantly clear. These people are charlatans specifically trained in the art of deception and prevarication and the best make it to the top where I have no idea as to what pressured them into the inclusion of the guaranteed Charter rights into the Constitution, but the fact is they are there and the governments have been exposed for the unscrupulous persons they are of nefarious bent.

95

The Golden Rule for Society- Gold for Law Society web site http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-lawsociety- documents the province of Ontario involvement in the conspiracy The original RCMP Final Letter Of Disposition web site documents the federal government involvement http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition/web/original-front-page Of course all the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and affiliate sites is germane to the government conspiracy explaining how their conspiracy has been successful under the watchful eyes of the police, media and Democracy Watch. The crooks design the system conducive to their protection and financial wellbeing that cannot be beaten by playing their game which is illegitimate and 180 degrees adverse to democracy and the Constitution and any initiatives against them that puts enough pressure only causes them to create agencies, commissions, task forces«whatever that operate on the same ideology as the Law Society of Upper Canada as documented. CanLaw www.canlaw.com a national Lawyer referral service makes mention on their front page that the Law Societies can not be trusted as they are there to protect their members from the consumer, not the consumer from their members and I reiterate the entire system is the same. They have the same to say for the judges. Duff Conacher Once again I attempt to get you to address the true problem of government organized crime personified and use all your evidence to support the charges I have made on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition. The Accountability Act, 2006 was just a cover up of the DOJ, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada deliberate irresponsible government¶s refusal to support every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. The members of the Law Societies, legal professionals business thrives off the victims they deliberately refuse to support as guaranteed 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Then when a person becomes victim due their negligence they have the nerve to charge them excessive costs, extortion money if they care to pursue the matter in the courts. That is unconstitutional. 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. Their attentiveness to ransack society absolutely indifferent to the individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights has them charging for their guaranteed Charter rights and have gotten so carried away that the majority of the Middle Class who are burdened with the taxes to finance such a pathetic system cannot afford it yet finance the Legal Aid system and obviously the majority of the criminal elements defence where the members of the Law Societies extend to them rights they are not entitled to while refusing to support

96

the Charter rights of the moral majority who are presumed innocence without evidence against them to suggest otherwise. The ramifications of this ideology«idiotology allows the criminal element«the amoral to go free when the victims cannot access the system where they leave many victims in their wake before they are finally brought before the courts for punishment on a first offense. The only viable method of protecting every individual is to punish every criminal as soon as possible, nipping it in the bud before they gain experience, confidence and get set in their criminal ways. There idiotology allows them to flourish and eventually hit the big times that then catches the interest of lawyers into the big money. The entire illegitimate legal system is inconsistent with the Constitution and of no force or effect as to its inconsistencies. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. The evidence shows once again that you are dealing with the symptoms guaranteed to persist as the system is designed by the members of the Law Societies. Instead of using your evidence to perhaps close one door that will only open another to the humongous waste of taxpayers money as more police or whatever will never do the job until the Government personnel are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to do the job consistent with the Constitution in exemplary fashion of efficiency and cost effectiveness to the diligent support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights, use it along with all evidence you have to back the charges published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites attacking at the root of the major portion of societies problems. A Public Inquiry is the only viable means to finally clean up the government. It s a laugh to expect they will clean it up by a barrage of requests to do so that will only cause them to create more agencies or commissions and I reiterate that I have tested many of them since the enactment of the Accountability Act, including the Conflict of Interest initiative only to prove the Commissioner Mary Elizabeth Dawson is no different than any other puppet organization created to appear as if they are sincere but invariably are their to diffuse the pressure and ultimately protect the members of the Law Societies, the DOJ, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the Ontario Attorney General who advise them all in the first place causing the conflict and when complaints are filed against them the DOJ and Attorney Generals advise the Commissions«.whatever that they were in the right«all adverse to the Constitution but consistent with the conspiracy. I request you once again ponder the wisdom of playing their game or actually taking affirmative action to finally clean up the governments. The governments of other countries are all the same and once initiatives begin here in Canada they will pick up around the world. All consumer products are highly inflated due the taxes embedded in them because of the unscrupulous world wide. Persistent poverty, starvation and the struggle of humankind are inevitable until their attitudes are made to change. Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force

97

This document ³DemocracyWatchOctober292008´ is published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition under heading Democracy Watch

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Action Alert listserve Sent: October 28, 2008 2:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ACTION Alert: Please support 3 key government lawsuits, and goodgovernment campaigns

THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO EVERYONE WHO HAS DONATED IN THE PAST YEAR AT: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html PLEASE PASS THIS MESSAGE ON to everyone you know in Canada, and if you have any questions about this email, contact Democracy Watch by email at: <[email protected]> Dear Friend of Democracy, Your help is needed right now to support the campaigns to close the 90 loopholes in the federal government's accountability system, and also to support three key government ethics lawsuits to stop snap election calls by the Prime Minister and provincial premiers, to stop lobbyists from doing favours for politicians they are lobbying, and to stop politicians and government officials from controlling investigations of themselves and their friends when they face accusations of wrongdoing. PLEASE DONATE NOW to help Democracy Watch pay the more than $30,000 cost of the 3 key government accountability lawsuits it has filed challenging: - Prime Minister Harper for violating his own fixed election date law by calling the recent snap federal election; - the federal Registrar of Lobbyists for ruling that it is ethical for a lobbyist to raise more than $70,000 for a Cabinet minister at the same time the lobbyist is lobbying the minister's department, and; - the federal Ethics Commissioner for ruling that Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet have not been in a conflict of interest when dealing with the Brian Mulroney-Karlheinz Schreiber affair. PLEASE ALSO DONATE NOW AND/OR SEND A LETTER TO FEDERAL PARTY LEADERS to support Democracy Watch's good government campaigns. SEE DETAILS BELOW (including a link to a sample letter to send to federal political party leaders) and please donate now at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html Thank you in advance to all of you who donate and/or send a letter to federal political party leaders in support of Democracy Watch's lawsuits and good government campaigns (and thank you to everyone who has donated or sent a letter in the past year). Sincerely, Duff Conacher, Coordinator Democracy Watch http://www.cleangovernment.ca 98

********** LAWSUIT #1 - STOP UNFAIR SNAP ELECTION CALLS BY THE PRIME MINISTER AND PREMIERS The federal government and the B.C., Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador provincial governments have all passed laws fixing the date of elections, and preventing the Prime Minister or premiers from calling snap elections when it is best for their political party. Prime Minister Stephen Harper ignored the law when he called a snap federal election on September 7th. Democracy Watch believes the election call was illegal, and is challenging the Prime Minister in Federal Court. This is the only action in Canada that has a chance of holding Prime Minister Harper accountable for his unfair, illegal election call. Democracy Watch tried to have the case heard before election day, but the Federal Court ruled that there was not enough time to consider the important issues raised by the case, and so the case will be heard in court in about 6 to 8 months. You can see details about the court case at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsOct0308.html ********** LAWSUIT #2 - STOP LOBBYISTS FROM DOING FAVOURS FOR CABINET MINISTERS THEY ARE LOBBYING Democracy Watch is challenging the federal Registrar of Lobbyists Michael Nelson in court because he ruled that no ethics rules were broken when a lobbyist organized and held a fundraising event that raised $70,000 for a Cabinet minister at the same time the lobbyist was lobbying the minister's department. If Democracy Watch wins, lobbyists will finally be stopped from doing favours for Cabinet ministers they are lobbying. In an extraordinary ruling, a Federal Court of Appeal Justice ordered Democracy Watch to $10,000 in costs in advance just to have the case heard by the court! You can see details about the court case at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsAug1508.html ********** LAWSUIT #3 - STOP POLITICIANS AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM CONTROLLING INVESTIGATIONS OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR FRIENDS Democracy Watch is challenging the federal Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson in court because she ruled that Prime Minister Harper and his Cabinet ministers can control the investigation into their actions and the actions of former Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney (even though Mulroney was an advisor to Harper until last November). If Democracy Watch wins, federal politicians and government officials will finally be stopped from controlling investigations about their and their friends' actions. You can see details about the court case at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsMay2108.html ********** 99

AND PLEASE SEND A LETTER CALLING ON FEDERAL PARTY LEADERS TO CLEAN UP THE SYSTEM, FINALLY Did you know that, because of loopholes in federal laws (even after the passage of the socalled "Federal Accountability Act"), Karlheinz Schreiber and Brian Mulroney could still be corporate lobbyists in secret today, and Schreiber could still give unlimited amounts of money in secret to all federal politicians after they left office, either as a donation or as payment for lobbying? Did you know that, because of more than 90 loopholes in the federal government's accountability system, it is legal: - to be dishonest in politics; - to make secret unlimited donations to all types of political candidates; - for MPs, riding associations and political parties to have secret trust funds; - to lobby in secret; - to do secret polling with the public paying; - for MPs to switch parties in-between elections just to further their career ambitions; - for the Prime Minister to appoint more than 2,000 law enforcement officers without any public review or hearings (including public inquiry commissioners), and; - for federal politicians, their staff and senior government officials to be involved in policymaking processes in which they have a direct financial interest, and to become lobbyists soon after they leave office? Did you know that the Accountability Act doesn't even protect all federal government employees who blow the whistle on government wrongdoing (and doesn't protect any other whistleblowers at all)? With a new Parliament opening soon, and a minority government (which means the opposition parties can pass bills they introduce, even if the government doesn't support the bill) now is a key time to push all federal parties to make strong pledges to close all the loopholes, and strengthen the enforcement and penalties, in the federal government's accountability system. Powerful lobbyists are always pushing to weaken the accountability system, and politicians are reluctant to increase their own accountability, so the federal political party leaders need to hear from you or they won't do anything to ensure honest, ethical, open, representative and wastepreventing government. PLEASE GO TO the following Democracy Watch webpage and use the sample letter to send a letter to all federal political party leaders telling them to clean up the federal government's accountability system, finally:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/actsystem.htm

OR GO TO:
http://www.goodgovernment.ca

AND click on the "Good Government Action Alert" link. To see background information on 16 situations in the past 15 years of federal politics that have revealed the 90 loopholes in the federal government's accountability system, go to:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/RelsNov0707.html

********** PLEASE ALSO DONATE NOW to help stop dishonest, unethical, secretive, unrepresentative and wasteful politics in Canada at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html 100

Democracy Watch does not accept money from governments or large corporations -- without your ongoing support Democracy Watch will have to shut down its good government campaigns (the only such campaigns in Canada) ******* THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for sending your letters, and for your ongoing support of Democracy Watch's good government court cases and campaigns. Sincerely, Duff Conacher, Coordinator Democracy Watch P.O. Box 821, Stn. B Ottawa, Canada K1P 5P9 Tel: (613) 241-5179 Fax: (613) 241-4758 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.cleangovernment.ca Since 1993, cleaning up and making governments and corporations more responsible and accountable to you, and making Canada the world's leading democracy -- please donate now at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/support.html

101

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: September 25, 2008 3:15 PM To: 'REVIEWS' Subject: RE: Check: Correction

September 25 2008 Please make note of corrected date on page 4 of the Request Review of Complaint September 25 2008 document published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force Excerpt from page 4 follows False statements are underlined Paragraphs 1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007) 2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report 3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam¶s report and wishes to share with me the results. 4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the RCMP¶s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately. He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson¶s email address and I could continue to send evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007, (Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007) perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson¶s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or« consulted with his superiors.) Please acknowledge Frank Gallagher

102

From: REVIEWS [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: September 23, 2008 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Check

This is to acknowledge receipt of your Request for a Review. You will be receiving a letter shortly confirming your request. Thank you.

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP Reviews & Investigations Unit FAX #: 613-952-8045 TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637 E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: September 23, 2008 3:24 PM To: REVIEWS Subject: Check

September 23 2008 Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Canada Post: Bag Service 1722 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B3 Fax-613-952-8045 www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Re: File No. PC-2007-2317
Re: Request Review of my Complaint RCMP refuse to investigate Government corruption and conspiracy Dear Commission Representative

Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick, On. L4P 2P8 905-476-8959 [email protected] Manager Charter Democracy Force www.cdf.name

I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-952-8045, and www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca 103

I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some difficulties communicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137 Street, Suite 102, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for Review of my Complaint by both Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca. Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST

All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced on the ³RCMP Final Letter of Disposition´ http://groups.google.com/group/rcmpfinal-letter-of-disposition affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy Force All evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your Surrey, British Columbia Office. The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be in on the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained in document ³Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008´ published on the aforementioned web site of which this is the first page.
The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your office November 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinent evidence there informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALIST of the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracyforce The CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. . It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP office since January 18 2006 when he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of the Newmarket detachment dated November 15 2005. On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by members of the Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under the Canada Business Act. The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located in Newmarket and was being forwarded on to them for review. I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant Don Wilson president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1) having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under the Criminal Code and Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so. By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already tried several government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to no avail, so that is the reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to try my luck that way.

This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society «Gold for Law Society web site
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-lawsociety-

104

under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A ± C documents now available on the ³RCMP Final Letter of Disposition´ web site along with other pertinent evidence.
You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience in how the police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had been committed by my former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they would be dealt with by professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and follow procedures I was not aware of or experienced in. I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in the administration and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act. My opinion has never wavered.

Police Services Act
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15 PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles: 1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve. 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the personnel of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be incompetence and eventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by members of the Law Societies beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the web sites. The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated the evidence This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam investigated and states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence. Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend the need to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is he competent to command a police force consistent with 105

the Police Services Act I will just address the issues he stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented and filed with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he felt was thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he states in his interim report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the letter from the Professional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of studying the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy published on my web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton detachment via e-mail addressed to Sergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is incomprehensible that the final 2 page report dated September 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis only contained a little more than one page of relative text, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam was a veteran investigator. It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed me when confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator will gather all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the RCMP members(s) involved, and any witnesses. The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and the report by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying the evidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the RCMP present at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint. Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1 ¾ months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam¶s report is indeed the report he prepared. I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam¶s report to ensure no time is allowed for a fixed new replacement report. A copy of Superintendent Robert Davis¶s report is enclosed. It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.

Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008 False statements are underlined Paragraphs 1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007) 2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report 3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam¶s report and wishes to share with me the results. 106

4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint, the RCMP¶s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately. He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson¶s email address and I could continue to send evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we met on October 7 2007, Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007 perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson¶s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul acted on his own or« consulted with his superiors.) It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors. I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and when Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he had to be thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was. That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis¶s report is self- evident he is not. I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the Constitution conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits and it is each person¶s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed with particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed to prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.

Police Services Act
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15 PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles 1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles: 107

1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve. 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs. Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy. You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher. 5) Staff Sergeant MacAdam¶s investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North Detachment on October 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new complaint but rather to provide more documents with respect to the same complaint I had previously made to the Commercial Crime Section (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS would not be investigating this complaint and I was provided with the rationale for that decision being informed the Department of Justice had been consulted prior to responding to me. As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 15 2005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomson addressed in his report on January 18 2006.

From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and many government departments and agencies to deal with the issues which led to the Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he is the ³guardian of the public interest´ which he refuses to guard.
5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process to me. I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do not take evidence by e-mail. He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been sending via Sergeant Michael Thomson¶s e-mail address was being kept on file and he already had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the November 15 2005 evidence I gave to Inspector Peter Goulet. 5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reaching and that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate. He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites is not vague at all. He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutably proves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of 108

corruption and conspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was just acting on instructions. 5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on toexplain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the complaint. (Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the complaint) 6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to Sergeant Thomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to the issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the correspondence on the file. As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomson¶s actions and when I brought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and he has had plenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the people whose e-mail addresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site 7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initial complaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilson¶s company and the Ontario Rental Housing and Tenant¶s Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was most appropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no criminal investigation would be undertaken I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomson¶s January 18 2006 e-mail again. He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being particularly reiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks legitimately convincing. 8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomson wrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminal activity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating the allegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and had referred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was established as well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that they would not be conducting an investigation. I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3¶ stack of hard copy but it is irrelative. The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police force of jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been provided the same evidence. 9) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore he supports Inspector Verheul¶s directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation being provided.

109

There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheul¶s directives. Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the order not to investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with his superiors? That is yet to be determined!!

10) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the CPU at the Ottawa office Of course I wish to exercise my right!!! That is what this all about. Right? I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now ( bottom of his 2nd page). Before Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See his May 20 2008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety Services ³O´ Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health and Safety Services ³O´ Division As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the Law Societies holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give a damn about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is the Law Society of Upper Canada required to examine evidence provided in support of complaints against their members. See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site. CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will see published on the Charter Democracy Force web site. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829583/Can-Law-August-182008 All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-mailed to everyone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web site addresses they would be published on. ************************************************************************ It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated by the superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent they already caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me. You will find that information on the ³RCMP Final Letter of Disposition´ web site or referenced where you will find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more. The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the conspiracy. 110

Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the conspiracy or cooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others. I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the rest of it is published and the other pertinent evidence. Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] now [email protected] The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence, anything at all please do not hesitate to contact me. Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force PS You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand. Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media. You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I get a lawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court. The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to access the civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also been provided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they attempt to orchestrate themselves out of this one. Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when they are confronted but the jig is up. There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights. That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar with so it could be somewhat clumsy.

111

From : Sent : To : CC : Subject :

Michael Thomson <[email protected]> January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM <[email protected]> "Mona Eichmann" <[email protected]> BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.

Dear Mr. Gallagher: I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our Newmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Corporations Act,Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been taken by our office for review. A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been consulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act. Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific in the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure that requires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an Inspector. The Inspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the corporation's books and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part XIX.1 outlines the apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies, offences and punishment. Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order to allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as outlined in Section 21 (1-10) CBCA. It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines of civil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter and no investigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally convey this message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a fax machine. The information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information purposes only. If you have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer at the numbers listed below. Yours truly, M.J. Thomson, Sgt. NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support. Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section, Milton, Ontario (905) 876-9656 (905) 876-9757 (Fax) [email protected]

112

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: September 18, 2008 8:21 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: FW: Request Review of Complaint September 18, 2008 Andree Leduc I have not yet received acknowledgement of receipt of the e-mail I sent September 11 2008. Please respond as to what actions you have taken regarding these most serious issues. Thank you Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: September 11, 2008 3:19 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Request Review of Complaint

September 11 2008 Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police 7337 137 Street, Suite 102 Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 Fax 604-501-4095 [email protected] Attention Andree Leduc Enquiries and Complaints Analyst Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Re: File No. PC-2007-2317
Re: Request Review of Complaint Dear Andree Leduc I hope you will be more cooperative than when you last wrote in December 2007 and refused to respond to my several attempts to have you confirm that you will and make some effort to be competent when this inevitable day arrived to request a review of my complaint against the RCMP as I am not satisfied with their deliberate incompetence consistent with the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy. Given the evidence and particular circumstances it would ne naïve of me to believe anything other than you are under the thumb of the major players of the conspiracy but never the less I must go through the motions following the modus operandi of the government documenting every step of the way for both present and future use. Frank Gallagher Manager Charter Democracy Force

113

.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same in return and of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from you I have learned to settle for more evidence as if I didn¶t have enough already. From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you one way or another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailed on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.charterdemocracyforce.ca and affiliate sites although in reference to the evidence originally attached to the complaints you will find it on the original Charter Democracy Force site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad, Glad mostly Sad«.Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered even though they answer themselves. I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in the following pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.

I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at the discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own investigation in the public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both. Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate Thank you Frank Gallagher
September 11 2008

114

Confucius 551 BC ± 479 BC

Golden Rule ³Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself´
³There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY «finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE´

Jesus ³Do unto others as you would have them do unto you´

Jonathan Swainger University of British Columbia history professor Edmund Morgan¶s compelling book ³Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America´ opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a number of fictions. In democracies for example, it is necessary for the population to ³believe´ that the people have a voice or«that the representatives of the people are the people´

Frank 1942 AD ± 200_

Manager, Charter Democracy Force When truth of a CONSISTENCY to a thing is the ultimate quest, the thing is self-evident even though supported by only one statement is self sufficient, impervious to any number of CONSISTENCIES of truths that do not maintain a CONSISTENCY with the thing . When all is said and done and such inconsistency remains adverse to the CONSISTENCY of the thing deception and prevarication is self-evident.

When persons develop prevarication to perfection they invariably deceive themselves making them inane to any purpose vulnerable to sane purpose of humongous advantage to the Charter 115

Democracy Force maintaining CONSISTENCY to a thing fair and relevant to all of the moral society of the Constitution of the democracy of Canada where eradication of amoral inclination is its purpose.

116

The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proven true. One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.
CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth with irrelevant unfounded truths consistently reveals the truth whether they are truths or lies where Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception. When ones mandate is to meet with a person to pay them back $5 owed and finds them lying in the street in pain a competent report on the incident, no matter how thorough to mandated purpose should include mention of the victim, how he or she got there, and what initiatives were taken to secure their safety and wellbeing and was there any obvious hazards that could be removed to ensure no reoccurrence. Due diligence to a purpose when the safety and wellbeing of every individual is severely jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of an authority assigned responsibility and the report is self-evident

117

118

Priority

Police Services Act
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc

Declaration of principles 1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles: 1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve. 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as guaranteed by the Charter? Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all concerned When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who perceives the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

Considering every individual¶s safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those people assigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either stated or implied.

119

Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions of the Constitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction meaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon society should the CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained. The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly the Attorney General of Ontario is the ³guardian of the public interest´ as the ³Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General´ published on the Ontario web site attests. CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy. The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who became lucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had been victimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in. Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST document are published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individual¶s equal guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper Canada demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and pathetically incomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose. So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved naturally and already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to divulge the root of the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the beginning that the office of the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his responsibility. This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right? Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force irrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally as guaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect every individual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose that they have the people ³believe´ So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the truth that what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified. 120

The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their ³Final Letter of Disposition had to wade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no concern to them as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to ³The Spirit of the Law´ and the vital role evidence plays. Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the conspiracy and most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible irreproachable entity of fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to every individual¶s guaranteed equal Charter rights. Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not expected of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but to forget it and move on to retain their sanity. Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of no avail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never intend to address. Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to divert the issues to a mental instability. Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.

Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things. They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence and arrogance«and stuff like that. Simple fact is it will betray you. Do not believe? Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the moral majority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy. The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success is dependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE. As the economy gets worse nature will take its course has history attests and be assured we of the Charter Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention of the predictable unnecessary chaos.

121

One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peaceful initiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy imbeciles devoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason. It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongous advantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the World Trade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left unchecked. Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site and with phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are involved we can now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for making it so vividly clear. This document ³ReceivedSeptember102008´ will be published in its appropriate place on the ³RCMP Final Letter of Disposition´ web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-finalletter-of-disposition

I need not mention how severely disappointed we are but nothing we had not expected and certainly nothing we were not prepared for. We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity to demonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make a formal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as evidenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name which Robert Davis, Superintendent, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam that you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the web sites but have chosen to ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see if I would come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later the incompetence remains.. It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed to go down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just investing the complaint against the RCMP members. He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to come down. I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the evidence and of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted appropriately without looking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that evidence appears to be irrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney General who plays a major role advising all government departments and agencies. 122

I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered trivial, frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure. You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intended purpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if your veteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble. OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren¶t they? All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for that he gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander. There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not to understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence. Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to be successful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to the conspiracy permitting its persistent existence. You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence clearly shows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in the conspiracy. I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand the error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly understands and it is to that endeavour I am most attentive. I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of this information are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act on their behalf consistent with the Constitituion. Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people in legitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution. The inane dribble you offered as a competent responsible irreproachable response may well be what you believe but as always evidence begets the truth and you people simply must familiarize yourselves with the concept. You state Sergeant Steinbach told me what my complaint was too vague which is utter nonsense but I know after 10 months study of the evidence that is so overwhelming with nothing left to debate and out of hundreds of pages of evidence you had to at least fill one page with something and why not utter crap that comes so readily. Given the most serious nature of the issues it is incomprehensible to suggest every (i) should be dotted and (t) s crossed where if you were the competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and conviction to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights you would have laid out the red carpet and thanked me for all the investigative work I did to help you better 123

serve the public interest and Attorney General Chris Bentley ³guardian of the public interest´ should have been pleased if not for the fact he is the major player along with the DOJ. You mentioned I was provided with the rationale back in 2006, January as I recall and that was an entirely different matter when after the York Regional Police demonstrated their incompetence to deal with the issues as well as many other government personnel I thought I would try in addition to address the matter under the Corporations Act«.whatever they call it further demonstrating Don Wilson¶s character but Sergeant Thomson pulled one of your tricks emphasizing that he was addressing the issues that I had presented back in November 2005 I believe it was, maybe early December under the auspices of the Corporations Act «whatever but since then I have provided the RCMP a preponderance of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime if you care to stay to pertinent point, and it was delivered by email via the Michael Thomson e-mail address and Sergeant Roy Steinbach acknowledged they had the evidence on file including a disk recording of the Tribunal hearing. That is why he refused to accept the evidence I brought down because he stated they already had it. Everything I am stating now is just reiterating the prodigious amount of reiterations published on the web sites and all you have demonstrated is your incoherence to the evidence and your irresponsible attitude towards the necessity of a responsible investigation on behalf of the people. I have no further interest in addressing the crapola contained with your Final Letter of Disposition when the evidence published on the web sites bares the truth and your report bares the truth of the incompetent and irresponsible ineptness of the RCMP to protect the people as guaranteed by the Charter when you make every effort to avoid the truth that lies within the evidence you stumbled over looking for something to put in your one page letter of content. Well the evidence stands for itself, not debateable and yet fools rush in to give it a try. Gee, that segues me to the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP who were kind enough to explain their incompetence and were determined not to get any wiser, no matter how hard I tried. I informed them this day would come and if they had of started getting prepared back in December 2007 they would be competently prepared so now we get to see the results. Why would they want the public to know they are incompetent? Don¶t answer, we know don¶t we? They really are cooperative with the conspiracy but they were hired specifically for their incompetence. Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission. Frank Gallagher 124

Manager Charter Democracy Force PS I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious Final Letter of Disposition didn¶t I? I suppose the obvious does not require the formality. If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could determine the cause and help me out. OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises make a kind gesture. One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18 2007 has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public interest. Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must ran rampant throughout the force. We cannot have that can we?

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

http://www.scribd.com/doc/10771992/A-a-a-a-a-a-List http://www.scribd.com/doc/15678663/GLIST-Single-Row Prominent government personnel, Federation of Law Societies, Bar Associations, Armed Forces and media across Canada listed in the above documents have been provided the evidence over the passed 4 years and have been informed of the Charter Democracy Force web site www.charterdemocracyforce.ca and affiliate sites referenced thereon. Not one person has acted appropriately consistent with the Constitution conducive to the exemplary support of every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits attentive only to their personal interests yet financed by the Canadian populace to provides the necessities of a moral society fairly and requiring them to be unbiased competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. It due the inherent bias nature of humankind that the ³The Spirit of the Law´ that is ³The Spirit of the Golden Rule´ that is the epitome of simplicity and sanity that has forever blown in the wind within the grasp of quadriplegics easily seen by the blind well understood by us all at 5 prior to the first day of school that ³The Spirit of the Law´ must be stringently enforced requiring competent responsible irreproachable unbiased persons of fortitude and conviction in, of and with the ³The Spirit of the Law´ to administer and enforce all laws consistent with the Constitution attentive to removing all inconsistencies with the Constitution and all obstructions that stand in the way of the certainty of the Charter guarantee to every individual equally. The evidence that I have provided them clearly demonstrates that there is no legitimate understanding of humanism and the necessity to structure the system removing all opportunities for the trusted nefarious bent to take advantage of and the fact these most serious issues have not been attended to even though they have been clearly informed of the humongously serious issues is conclusive proof they are not the competent unbiased responsible irreproachable persons demanded of them either stated or implied, however they have demonstrated exemplary fortitude and conviction to appear to be the persons required making every effort to cover up the truth using the people¶s money to create agencies, Commissions, Ombudsman « whatever publicly announcing they are created for the people to file complaints of government personnel improprieties but clearly they are provided limited mandates to deal with the most serious issues of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy being their forte and precisely what they do with not a shred of evidence to suggest that they are anything but charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration of illegitimates laws and the minds of the people. They use the people¶s money to commission reports on their orchestration of filling the Legal Aid kitty attempting to have us believe that they care about every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights while their only interests are personal common to luxurious lifestyle to the people¶s humongous detriment leaving poverty in their wake that begets hopelessness and despair that begets the criminal element that begets them innumerable victims which they refuse to protect consistent with the Constitution and their guaranteed Charter right as in 134

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. Then when they become a victim they deny them their rights as in 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. All pertinent evidence is mandatory to determine the truth and yet the police are obstructed by warrant requirements by the nefarious bent propagates of the Law Society designed to protect themselves that ultimately protects the criminal element being necessary to expand their industry consistent to the progressive advancement of their insatiable lusts for wealth and power with every advancement more leverage to shoe horn us out of our shoes. Their admittance http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273017/law-society-february-10-2007

That their members are not required to give a damn about every individual¶s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelative when it is against their members and their demonstration to support their belief in dealing with their member I complained about is conclusive proof whereas every initiative perpetrated by these scum of the earth supports that to be true. www.canlaw.com http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829583/Can-Law-August-182008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829870/Star-Lawyer-Increase-Saturday-July-262008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All

The BLACK BOOK series certainly provides the irrefutable proof to finish them off http://www.scribd.com/doc/10772569/BLACK-BOOK-Series-Commentary http://www.scribd.com/doc/14570007/BLACK-BOOK-Series-Commentary http://www.scribd.com/doc/9641760/BLACK-BOOK-IOriginal-September-1-2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9272976/black-book http://www.scribd.com/doc/9654291/Black-Book-II-1-Preamble http://www.scribd.com/doc/13402834/Black-Book-II-1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9640180/Black-Book-II-2 http://www.scribd.com/doc/13405112/BLACK-BOOK-III http://www.scribd.com/doc/13406249/Black-Book-IV http://www.scribd.com/doc/13407554/Black-Book-V

135

http://www.scribd.com/my_docs http://www.scribd.com/doc/14534884/Sun-Editor-October-8 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10099785/Sun-Editor-October-8-2006 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14536061/Dave-Grech-September-1-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9419495/mad-glad-mostly-sad http://www.scribd.com/doc/9424684/dave-grech-compiled-september1-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9666234/Lawyer-Files http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326450/lawyer-file-1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326633/lawyer-file-2 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326661/lawyer-file-3 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326671/lawyer-file-4 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326701/lawyer-fie-5 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326717/lawyer-fie-6 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326729/lawyer-fie-7 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326757/lawyer-file-8 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326780/lawyer-file-9 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326791/lawyer-file-10 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326839/lawyer-file-11 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326850/lawyer-file-12 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326855/lawyer-fie-13 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326859/lawyer-fie-13a http://www.scribd.com/doc/9326863/lawyer-file-14 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273037/ombudsman http://www.scribd.com/doc/13300854/OmbudsmanCompiled10308 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14542085/Ombudsman-Ponders-His-Ass-October-32008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273017/law-society-february-10-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829583/Can-Law-August-182008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9829870/Star-Lawyer-Increase-Saturday-July-262008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All http://www.scribd.com/doc/9452178/rcmp-original-commentary http://www.scribd.com/doc/9273051/rcmp-compiled-december-20-2008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9666338/Black-Book-Portfolio http://www.scribd.com/doc/9682944/the-BB http://www.scribd.com/doc/9688718/The-BB-is-Now-in-the-Lieutenant-Govenors-Court http://www.scribd.com/doc/9701350/The-BB-is-Now-in-the-Hands-of-GLIST-1309 http://www.scribd.com/doc/9838279/Stockwell-Day-November-3-and-5-2007 I tried to tell Stockwell that words are meaningless unless backed http://www.scribd.com/doc/9858330/Know-the-Law http://www.scribd.com/doc/9985542/The-Humongous-Little-Lie-of-the-DOJ-January-22-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/10163413/truth-about-the-liesb http://www.scribd.com/doc/10774941/Preamble-Federal-Correspondence-Recap-October-92007 136

http://www.scribd.com/doc/11366480/DOJ-January-222007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/11644706/Banned-CDF-February-4-2009

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13163481/The-Golden-Rule http://www.scribd.com/doc/13249997/Julian-Falconer-OPP-Julian-Fantino-March-13-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/13493504/BioSafe-Prospectus-Fraudulent http://www.scribd.com/doc/13496662/Commission-Public-Complaints-RCMP http://www.scribd.com/doc/13579097/Truth http://www.scribd.com/doc/13794902/The-Golden-Rule-is-the-Epitome-of-Simplicity-andSanity http://www.scribd.com/doc/13689081/Equality-the-Only-Road-to-Sanity http://www.scribd.com/doc/13801078/Continued-From-Sanity-First http://www.scribd.com/doc/13971852/CDF-April-4-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14001592/Reality-Significance-of-Golden-Rule http://www.scribd.com/doc/14023048/Sun-Joe-Warming-Ton http://www.scribd.com/doc/14086929/Conflict-Interest-Ethics-Apr-9-09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14123798/ConfIict-Interest-Compiled-October-52008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14132226/DW-Compiled-Conflict-of-Interest-April-10-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14135236/Make-Poverty-History http://www.scribd.com/doc/14139073/Archbishop-Apr-10-09 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14674114/Jim-Wilson-MPP-April-26-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/14858568/No-2Tier-brings-tears http://www.scribd.com/doc/15014872/Dawson-Creek-Dolores-Desperately-Needs-Our-Help http://www.scribd.com/doc/15092821/The-People-Make-a-Stand-in-Dawson-Creek-May-112009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/15095795/These-People-Know http://www.scribd.com/doc/15278656/Utmost-Importance-May-12-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/15417670/Smoking-Bum-Agjn-the-Wind-Farters http://www.scribd.com/doc/15477221/They-Thrive-on-Poverty-Fear-and-Befuddlement http://www.scribd.com/doc/15587061/Dear-Dolores-Prospective-CDF-Member-in-Training http://www.scribd.com/doc/15611164/Commission-RCMP-Complaints-Dec-27-2007 http://www.scribd.com/doc/15623724/Democracy-Now http://www.scribd.com/doc/15675931/Not-2-Tier-system-if-they-use-word-Threshold http://www.scribd.com/doc/15679033/This-Little-Piggy-Went-to-Market http://www.scribd.com/doc/15683218/Dry-Up-Chief-Rain-Storm http://www.scribd.com/doc/15751397/Help-Me-Help-You-and-Invariably-Me http://www.scribd.com/doc/15771251/Reality-is-That-Which-Persistently-Comes-AroundProviding-Us-This-Unique-Opportunity-to-Deal-With-It http://www.scribd.com/doc/15781687/May-24-2009-Just-May-Go-Down-in-History http://www.scribd.com/doc/17105375/Legal-Profession-Government-Organized-CrimeCOLLAPSE 137

Most recently published up to July 14 2009 - Most recent on top

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16901420/CheckMatecc

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17290090/JCURAP-Jesus-Confucius-United-Revelations-ActuatePower-September-1-2008 http://www.scribd.com/doc/17273042/ASSHOLE-Senator-Larry-Campbell-Shits-Himself http://www.scribd.com/doc/17246773/September-Government-Collapse http://www.scribd.com/doc/17239175/Certified-Government-Conspiracy-Check-Mate http://www.scribd.com/doc/17162470/Certifying-the-Minister-of-Public-Safety-Peter-VanLoan http://www.scribd.com/doc/17147585/Open-Democracy-Bullshit-July-6-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/17105375/Legal-Profession-Government-Organized-CrimeCOLLAPSE http://www.scribd.com/doc/17062727/Red-Coats-or-Camouflage-to-the-Rescue-or-Slaughter http://www.scribd.com/doc/17017985/Integrity-Yea-Right1 http://www.scribd.com/doc/17015664/Check-Mate-Canada-Charterdemocracyforcecc http://www.scribd.com/doc/16987127/Check-Mate http://www.scribd.com/doc/16901420/CheckMatecc http://www.scribd.com/doc/16846973/Check http://www.scribd.com/doc/16769615/Government-Organized-Crime-TakeDown-by-LegalMeans http://www.scribd.com/doc/16689884/We-Are-the-People-We-Are-CDF1CA http://www.scribd.com/doc/16647014/Is-the-Pen-Mightier-Than-the-Learned-Legitimate-Mind http://www.scribd.com/doc/16556462/Assholeism-to-Idealism http://www.scribd.com/doc/16542914/Acceptance-of-Reality-is-Illegal-Under-the-Constitution http://www.scribd.com/doc/16311488/How-Much-Shit-Would-an-ASSHOLE-Shit-if-We-thePeople-Were-Not-Twits http://www.scribd.com/doc/16264196/A-Major-Day-in-the-Anal-of-History http://www.scribd.com/doc/16240970/Sanity-is-the-Best-We-Can-Hope-for-But-Should-Dothe-Trick http://www.scribd.com/doc/16109663/His-ASSHOLE-Peter-Van-Loan-It-is-the-Principle-ofthe-Thing http://www.scribd.com/doc/16065858/Impatiently-We-Wait-for-Harper-to-Signal-the-Start-ofthe-End-of-the-Struggle-of-Humankind http://www.scribd.com/doc/16056407/Cdf1CA-Kick-Ass http://www.scribd.com/doc/16038580/The-3rd-Tier http://www.scribd.com/doc/15963797/This-Document-Dated-May-31-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/15929062/History-in-the-Making-a-Collectors-Item http://www.scribd.com/doc/15885148/123-and-4-Verbal-Assault-on-Asshole-Ism-Till-ThereAint-No-More http://www.scribd.com/doc/15883070/When-Sanity-is-Relevant-We-Sit-on-ASSHOLES http://www.scribd.com/doc/15874324/WE-Wrote-Them-a-Letter http://www.scribd.com/doc/15844777/Mulroney-Casually-Informs-No-Taxes-if-You-Do-NotSpend-Your-Money-Okay-I-Promise http://www.scribd.com/doc/15841808/CDF-Asks-Harper-ASSHOLE-or-STUPID-ASSRegistered-Mail 138

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15815252/How-Does-Anyone-Know-Anything http://www.scribd.com/doc/15781687/May-24-2009-Just-May-Go-Down-in-History http://www.scribd.com/doc/15771251/Reality-is-That-Which-Persistently-Comes-AroundProviding-Us-This-Unique-Opportunity-to-Deal-With-It http://www.scribd.com/doc/15751397/Help-Me-Help-You-and-Invariably-Me http://www.scribd.com/doc/15092821/The-People-Make-a-Stand-in-Dawson-Creek-May-112009 By far the document most read http://www.scribd.com/doc/13895689/Mongrel-1

139

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.

The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law.

The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
When fat pigs fly Against all laws There is nothing holding them up Be sure to stand clear before you tell them
A few excerpts from reality « Supporting Evidence from the Web Bilderberg http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/bilderberg-group/ http://www.bilderberg.org/2004.htm http://www.swordofpower.org/whatisthenewworldorder.html http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/091107_hillary_denies.html http://irish-nationalism.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-375.html http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/6299-4049 http://www.illuminati-news.com/bilderberg-secret-world-government.htm http://thehiddenevil.com/bb.asp http://www.propagandamatrix.com/watsonrptbilderberg1.html http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9270 http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=358df7bd-7a54-41e4-9366df1733597c30&k=96354 http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/BILDER.HTM http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&rlz=1W1ADRA_en&q=Ron+paul+and+involvement+wit h+Bilderberg+group.&btnG=Search&meta http://bilderbergbook.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=1 140

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-dTLZKN_UQ http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/133839584-unification-the-real-canadian-bilderbergagenda http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/harper_new_bilderberg_boy.html US Take Over of Canada « Then the World http://www.scribd.com/doc/4776520/US-Takeover-of-Canada http://stoplying.ca/articles/07/july/072007dananau.php http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/03/26/01439.html http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3243 http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/bush-seeks-take-over-of-canada-under-terrorpretext-says-council-of-canadians/ Corporate Take Over ± Who Knew? http://www.harperindex.ca/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=00154 http://www.flora.org/flora/archive/mai-info/confront.htm http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=968060&lang=eng_news&cate_img= 35.jpg&cate_rss=news_Business http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1032240255.html;jsessionid=B0A65009DCC6 A4C7CFE864B7AAB2F7EB.ehctc1 http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235930354-corporate-takeover-of-canada http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=271%3 Awar-and-globalization-the-truth-behind-september&catid=75%3A9-11truth&Itemid=89&lang=en http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=98

Rockefeller Satanic Blood Line http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_rockefeller_bloodline.htm http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1107696/david_rockefeller_speaks_about_population_control / http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6C24GpgQTQ Ron Paul http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZqeIH_PbVs&feature=related Alex Russo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CXG94slKcY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBvjkvmryI0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yO2Vfxa-Q8&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OG8ufziUok&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLf7IHe5ZgE&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM3H_xy9ccs&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjSflPY_zCg&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0Gxny-UNr4&feature=related 141

Fema http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x247 88 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&feature=channel_page Iran http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/cia-has-distributed-400-million-dollars-inside-iranto-evoke-a-revolution/ Amnesty International 2009 http://report2009.amnesty.org/en/ Open Air Prison Gaza Strip http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=political+prisoners+held+in+open+air+prison.&btnG= Google+Search&meta=&aq=f&oq Global Warming Doomsday-2012 http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2007/01/09/global-warming-doomsday-45-billion-deadby-2012/ War - Afghanistan http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/4802080/12815776 http://mitchieville.com/category/stephen-harper/ Truth http://thetyee.ca/cms/Books/2008/05/14/MelHurtig/ http://thetyee.ca/ Canadian Taxpayers Federation http://www.taxpayer.com/taxpayer/home1 Montreal Corruption Probe http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/06/16/montreal-mayor-corruption-policeinvestigation-construction.html Ignatieff http://www.stephentaylor.ca/2009/05/we-created-the-country-you-live-in-never-forget-it/ Martin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponsorship_scandal http://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/06/14/BeyondSponsorship/ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,176952,00.html Martin Okay but Chretien « They are structured to clear but appear Justice has been served http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/corruption-inquiry-clears-canadas-pm513574.html On the Take « Mulroney years 142

http://www.amazon.ca/Take-Crime-Corruption-Greed-Mulroney/dp/0770427081 http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=110 Harper selling our Silverware « Who are these people? ... People? http://myblahg.com/?p=3871 Accountability? Canadian Government Bull Shittery « When you are corrupt watcha gonna do? http://www.international.gc.ca/crime/corruption.aspx?lang=eng http://www.petitiononline.com/cc2006/petition.html Too much work to screen immigration notorious http://updates.canadafirst.net/2009/02/those-stripper-visas-eau-de-corruption.html http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2007/11/30/corruption-and-torture-continue-inafghanistan.html http://www.quran.ca/2008/01/12/prime-minister-canada-mohammed-al-mallees-osama-binladen/#comment-1412 http://montrealsimon.blogspot.com/2008/09/harper-prison-rapeand-angry-canadians.html http://www.mywebbercast.com/video/gallery/STEPHEN-HARPER-WANTED-FORTREASON-AND-WAR-CRIMES Two sides to story. .. but truth is military fight for money - governments not the people who provide the money http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2009/05/14/9461056-cp.html http://www.artsnews.ca/Archives/2004Q2/2004Q2Media.html Corruption Canada http://www.google.ca/search?q=corruption+in+canada&hl=en&start=10&sa=N http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYZZOunun00 http://www.odiousdebts.org/odiousdebts/index.cfm?DSP=content&ContentID=11106 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9E00E7DA143AE533A25753C3A9619C9460 9ED7CF http://www.businessethicscanada.ca/dialogue/news/x20080501c.html http://fairwhistleblower.ca/fair/key_messages.html http://www.canadaka.net/forums/canadian-politics-f17/corruption-in-canada-t3345.html http://jackdied.com/article/132 http://www.ccvf.net/index.cfm?viewID=47 http://oilsandstruth.org/topics/corruption http://www.icwt.us/index.php/2008/12/04/canada-dicatorship-socialist-state-or-police-stateyou-choose/ http://us.altermedia.info/news-of-interest-to-white-people/canada-bans-british-mp-foropposing-gaza-afghan-wars_4979.html

143

RCMP http://www.lufa.ca/news/news_item.asp?NewsID=6859 Police Corruption BC http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/senate/3853/ Dawson Creek man Murdered http://www.opinion250.com/blog/view/5211/3/police+ask+for+help+in+murder+investigation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkiBtCgwTYk http://www.topix.com/forum/ca/british-columbia/TLI9O3IDVICSNL94J Police Corruption Canada http://www.mapinc.org/newstcl/v04/n666/a06.html Police Killing http://www.justicepouranas.org/en_main.html Militarizing Police http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=276%3 Ano-police-state&catid=82%3Acampaigns&Itemid=86&lang=en http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=276%3 Ano-police-state&catid=82%3Acampaigns&Itemid=86&lang=en

Corruption in the media « Who Knew? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNcu_d5Frow http://k0rs0.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/why-is-%E2%80%98the-media%E2%80%99-lying-tous/ http://newsdaily.ca/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=5446 http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20050922/conrad_black_timeline_050 922/20050930/ CNN ± Compromising for news http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/CNNs_Iraqi_Cover-Up.asp

US and Canada Guilty Racism 144

http://www.humanrights-geneva.info/U-S-and-Canada-found-guilty-of,3348

Banks http://www.openleft.com/diary/12679/its-the-criminality-stupid-bill-moyerswilliam-black-onthe-wall-street-meltdown Missing Children http://kelowna.cioc.ca/record/KNA0749 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_8086.aspx http://innertemplelibrary.wordpress.com/category/passports/ http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/minors/minors_834.html http://www.pptc.gc.ca/cdn/16-.aspx http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070221/us_passports_070221?s_na me=&no_ads Judicial Watch http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=contact+judicial+watch+from+canada&btnG=Google+ Search&meta=&aq=f&oq

Feseral Jack http://www.examiner.com/x-1051-Independent-Examiner~y2009m3d13-The-United-States-ofCorruption-125-Billion-Scam

Obama http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=20147 http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2009/06/obamas-lies-about-holy-koran.html http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/05/documented-lie-50-obama-claimed-he-had.html http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/03/obamas-lies-pil.html http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/05/023642.php 911 Truth http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20090520143939920 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490 http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=271%3 Awar-and-globalization-the-truth-behind-september&catid=75%3A9-11truth&Itemid=89&lang=en Hells Angels http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,599507,00.html http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/museum/events.php?id=193 http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i5111 Bush/Clinton http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Bush+Clinton+talk+Afghanistan/1644777/story.html 145

FBI-Reporting Crimes http://www.fbi.gov/contactus.htm Gangs Increasing in Military« Why not? « They are gangs http://www.military.com/news/article/gangs-increasing-in-military-fbi-says.html http://www.scribd.com/doc/4097019/FBI-report-on-gangs-in-the-military Social Inequalities http://phil.uregina.ca/CRC/herald_demise.html http://phil.uregina.ca/CRC/herald_lying.html Hate speech http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=214592005713&ref=nf Cheney wants USA attacked? http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55D1SM20090614 Harper Recognizes Abuse to Aboriginals? http://www.northeastnews.ca/ http://auto_sol.tao.ca/node/3137 http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourview/2009/04/how_should_stephen_harper_cele.html Aboriginal http://www.thestar.com/specialsections/crime/article/460763 http://www2.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?k=23013&id=e2ecbd20-6ca4-49e48165-c458a225aa34 http://www.metisnation.ca/contact.html http://www.blogtalkradio.com/redtownradio Britain http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,3436787,00.html http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25361297-7583,00.html?from=public_rss http://deandonaldson.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/the-nazi-state-of-britain/ http://bnp.org.uk/resources/liars-buggers-and-thieves/conservative-party-criminals/ http://mostlywater.org/britains_shame_over_child_detainees http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/14/north-korea-un-nuclear-war

http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/singlenews.php?en=en&layout=mnn&newsnr=726 &backurl=/news/news3.php?lang=en&layout=mnn&sortorder=0&srcscript=/news/news3.php Aboriginal http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/singlenews.php?en=en&layout=mnn&newsnr=726 &backurl=/news/news3.php?lang=en&layout=mnn&sortorder=0&srcscript=/news/news3.php http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/singlenews.php?en=en&layout=mnn&newsnr=726 &backurl=/news/news3.php?lang=en&layout=mnn&sortorder=0&srcscript=/news/news3.php http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_sex_coverup/article_archive.htm 146

Us banks http://blacklistednews.com/news-4462-200-13-13--.html 911 http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/john-kerry-admits-building-7-wasdeliberately-demolished/ http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/bombshell-911-cover-up-unraveling/ Afghanistan Iraq http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=782 http://september11th.multiply.com/video/item/182 http://impeachforpeace.org/evidence/pages/war.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt-3lVD1dZg http://september11th.multiply.com/video/item/182 Harper http://anyonebutharper.ca/video/2008/09/bush-his-harper-mini-me/ http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF8&rlz=1T4ADRA_enCA333CA333&q=EXPOSE+HARPER http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article/235930502-stephen-harper-a-psychopath-in-power http://groups.google.com/group/ont.politics/browse_thread/thread/42c780a1dceec780?pli=1 http://www.vimeo.com/2413347 http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=THETRUTH+ABOUT+STEPHEN+HARPER&btnG= Google+Search&meta=&rlz=1W1ADRA_en&aq=f&oq Mulroney http://outoftheshadows.ca/2007/11/13/lying-brian-surfaces-again/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/www.stoplying.ca/ Hells Angels http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-qy-D-sQRY http://news.aol.ca/article/Berniers-Ex-Girlfriend-Linked-to-Hells-Angels/222333/ NWO http://www.policestateplanning.com/nwo_speech.htm http://www.illuminati-news.com/secret-societies-nwo.htm

147

Am I the only person being persistently attacked by the My Doom virus? What do you suppose they have in mind when they pretend to be acting on behalf of Rogers requesting personal information and password? How many companies profit from virus packages and do they send the viruses to create the industry. The legal professionals create their necessity to live to a luxurious lifestyle. Why is it the computer conglomerates or the network providers are not held responsible? Why do the people need to persistently suffer to the nefarious bent? Perhaps it is because the nefarious bent are running the show being precisely who the people believe are supposed to be eradicated from society. When the crooks are minding the store and design a system to investigate themselves their success is secure being why the Charter Democracy Force investigated them and why they make every effort to obstruct the truth from reaching the people. They are extremely bad people« They are ASSHOLES

148

From: Rogers Yahoo! Mail Virus Protection [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: July-14-09 2:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Alert: Virus Detected but not Cleaned - Attachment Removed [g ayoc] Your Rogers Yahoo! Mail Virus Protection detected the virus 'W32.Mydoom.M@mm' in the file '[email protected]', attached to the enclosed email message. We scanned the file using Norton AntiVirus but were unable to clean it. Therefore, we removed the content of the attachment from the message. Please contact the message sender if you want to receive the attachment. They must clean the file and resend it before we can deliver it to you safely. Rogers Yahoo! Mail successfully cleans most infected attachments, which protects you from viruses.

-----Original Message----From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rogers Customer Care Sent: July-15-09 6:25 AM Subject: !!! Rogers Account Updates !!! Request Authenticated !!! Reply Needed !!! Rogers Yahoo! hi-speed internet<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/logo.jpg> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/header1.jpg> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> Thank you for registering with Rogers Yahoo!<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/header2.jpg> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/header3.jpg> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> ROGERSŒ, HI-SPEED INTERNET

Dear Valued Member, Account Alert Dear Valued Member, Due to the congestion in our Rogers! servers,there would be removal of all unused Rogers! Accounts.You will have to confirm if your E-mail is still active by filling out your login info below after clicking the reply button, or your account will be suspended within 24 hours for security reasons. Your personal information:-

149

<https://secure.wlxrs.com/%7ELive.SiteContent.ID/%7E14.2.1230/%7E/%7E/%7E/Li veID16.gif> User name:...............................([email protected]) <https://secure.wlxrs.com/%7ELive.SiteContent.ID/%7E14.2.1230/%7E/%7E/%7E/Li veID16.gif> Password:................................. <https://secure.wlxrs.com/%7ELive.SiteContent.ID/%7E14.2.1230/%7E/%7E/%7E/Li veID16.gif> Date of Birth:............................. <https://secure.wlxrs.com/%7ELive.SiteContent.ID/%7E14.2.1230/%7E/%7E/%7E/Li Country :................................... veID16.gif>

<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> After updating your account information,your account will not be interrupted and will continue to work as normal.Thanks for your attention to this request. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Warning!!! Account owner that refuses to update his or her account before two weeks of receiving this warning will lose his or her account permanently.

Have you installed online security? Enjoy peace of mind online - free! Rogers Online Protection logo<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/verizon/090301/image_rop.jpg> Rogers Online Protection Keep your computer safeguarded at all times with an all-in-one security suite that includes Anti-Virus, Anti-Spyware, Firewall and Parental Controls. Installation is easy. Learn more <http://www.hispeed.rogers.com/bband/content/protect> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> <http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ccs/rogers/08121/spacer.gif> ŒRogers is a trademark of Rogers Communications Inc. used under license. ®Yahoo!, the Yahoo! logos, and other Yahoo! product and service names are the trademarks of Yahoo! Inc. used under license. Other brand names and logos are the property of their respective owners, used under license or with permission. Please do not reply to this message. This is a service e-mail related to the use of your Hi-Speed Internet. Please read the privacy polices <http://na.edit.client.yahoo.com/rogers/show_static?.form=privacy> of each of Rogers and Yahoo! to learn more about how Yahoo! and Rogers use your personal information, including the use of web beacons <http://info.yahoo.com/privacy/ca/yahoo/webbeacons> in HTML-based e-mail.

150

Yahoo! is located at 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. Rogers Cable Communications Inc. is located at 333 Bloor Street East. Toronto, Ontario M4W 1G9.

151

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close