BHP - Enterprise Risk Management

Published on July 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 58 | Comments: 0 | Views: 836
of 35
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

#BHP

Risk Management Strategy Briefing
Charles W Goodyear
Chief Financial Officer

Rowen H Bainbridge
Vice President Market Risk Management
December 2000

Agenda
• Introduction • Strategy • Rationale • Strategy in practice • Communications

#BHP

Market Risk Management Strategy

#BHP

• Market Risk Strategy is consistent with BHP’s overall strategy • The outcome is simple, but its based on complex, quantitative analysis • Strategy works for BHP due to its low cost, diversified asset base • Tools become building blocks for decision-making beyond the market risk strategy

Agenda
• Introduction • Strategy • Rationale • Strategy in practice • Communications

#BHP

‘Portfolio Risk Management’
Market Risk Management Objective

#BHP

• To support the delivery of BHP’s financial targets, while protecting the Company’s future financial security and flexibility.

Market Risk Management Strategy
• To manage risk at the portfolio level through the natural diversification in the BHP Portfolio. • To only hedge when the residual risk in the portfolio may compromise the delivery of corporate objectives. • To a limited extent capture value when a market within the portfolio deviates significantly from long run expectations. • To communicate BHP's policy and resultant risk profile to stakeholders in a clear, precise and responsive manner.

‘Portfolio Risk Management’ Strategy
• Manage risk at the portfolio level

#BHP

Understand portfolio characteristics Link capital allocation to portfolio risk

• Manage risk to an acceptable level
Self insurance model Only hedge if you have to

• Limited strategic financial transactions
Markets under/over valued within agreed limits

• Raise bar on communications
Clear, precise and responsive

Agenda
• Introduction • Strategy • Rationale • Strategy in practice • Communications

#BHP

Elements of our rationale
• • • • • • • BHP has a diversified portfolio There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility Good communication is highly valued by investors Costs of hedging are high for BHP's key risks Only hedge if you have to Financial markets provide opportunities to improve returns

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio

#BHP

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

There is no value in reducing volatility
Total Shareholder Return vs. Volatility (last 4 years)
Source: Thompson FIR May 2000, BHP Team analysis

#BHP

50 Total Shareholder Return (%) 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 0 10 20 30 40 Volatility (%) 50 60
BHP
BHP's Peer Companies Hedger Non-hedger

Rationale

#BHP

• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility • Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility

Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility
Comparison of Premium Return to Premium Value
Source: Goldman Sachs ‘Essential Oils’

#BHP

1.2

Exxon Mobil
BPAmoco Chevron Texaco Royal Dutch Shell

Market Multiple

1.0 0.8 0.6
OMV Lasmo 0.4

TotalFinaElf

Norsk Hydro

CEPSA ENI Repsol YPF Enterprise

0.2

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

Economic Value Added

Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility

#BHP

1999 Actual Comparison of Premium Return to Premium Value
2.50 2.00 Market Multiple 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0.00% 2.00% Economic Value Added 4.00% 6.00%
BHP's Peer Companies Hedger Non-hedger

Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility
Source: BHP Team analysis

#BHP

1999 Actual Comparison of Premium Return to Premium Value
2.50 2.00 Market Multiple 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0.00% 2.00% Economic Value Added 4.00% 6.00%
Rio Tinto

BHP's Peer Companies Hedger
Enron Woodside

Non-hedger

Western Mining

Shell Freeport Copper Devon BHP Chevron Phelps Dodge Suncor Energy North Ltd Total Fina Nucor Corp Phillips Petroleum Unocal Corp Enterprise Oil Lasmo

Exxon

BP Amoco

Barrick Gold

USX-US Steel Group

Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility
Source: BHP Team analysis

#BHP

1999 Actual Comparison of Premium Return to Premium Value
2.50 2.00 Market Multiple 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -6.00% -4.00% -2.00% 0.00% 2.00% Economic Value Added 4.00% 6.00%
BHP's Peer Companies

Risk Management as Intellectual Capital

Strategy 1

Simplicity, clarity and low cost strategy

Strategy 2

Hedger Non-hedger

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

• Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility • Good communication is highly valued by investors

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

• Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility • Good communication is highly valued by investors • Costs of hedging are high for BHP’s key risks

Costs of hedging high for key risks
Source: BHP Team analysis

#BHP
Average
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Average

3,000 2,800 2,600 2,400 2,200 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 Cash

A Copper Example
3 month 15 month 27 month

LME Futures Contracts

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

• Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility • Good communication is highly valued by investors • Costs of hedging are high for BHP’s key risks • Only hedge if you have to

Only hedge if you have to

#BHP
Illustrative
Cashflow Call on Cash

$AUS MILLION

2001

2002

2003

2004

FINANCIAL YEAR

How Market Risk effects gearing
US Industrials
MEDIAN UPPER QUARTILE 51.4 Single ‘A’ Rating

#BHP
Prob. (Key ratio > 51.4%) Unhedged Current hedge 100% hedgeable <1% <1% <1%

39.2

30.3 LOWER QUARTILE

0.8 0.7 0.6

Probability

0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 80 60 40 20 0

Unhedged Current hedge 100% hedgeable

Gearing (percent) 2001
Source: BHP Team analysis

How Market Risk effects financial plans #BHP
Gearing distribution 2003
MEDIAN UPPER QUARTILE

Prob. (Key ratio > 51.4%) Unhedged 30.3 LOWER QUARTILE 100% Hedged After management action Possible Management Actions 15% 14% 1%

51.4

39.2

Single ‘A’ Rating

0.3

• Discretionary CAPEX • Acquisitions • Exploration • Funding requirements • Divided policy • Share buy-backs • Discretionary investments/distribution

Probability

0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 80 60 40 20 0

Unhedged After management action 100% hedgeable

Gearing (percent)
Source: BHP Team analysis

Rationale
• BHP has a diversified portfolio • There is no value in reducing volatility

#BHP

• Valuations reflect corporate strategy not earnings volatility • Good communication is highly valued by investors • Costs of hedging are high for BHP’s key risks • Only hedge if you have to • Financial markets provide opportunities to improve returns

Financial markets provide opportunities to improve returns

#BHP

10 Year Histogram of 15 Month Futures Contract
15 Month Contract as at 17/10/00 = $27.39 USD/bbl

Probability

Percentile > P99

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

More

15 Month Contract For Oil (USD/bbl)

Agenda
• Introduction • Strategy statement • Rationale • Strategy in practice • Communications

#BHP

Strategy in practice

#BHP

Strategy in practice
What is the potential range of risk?
P90 Riding the waves Agreed strategy Choppy waters

#BHP

P5 Rating Agency disaster case P1

Strategy in practice
Risk limits for the portfolio
• • • Cashflow at Risk limit; The risk that BHP gearing will exceed target gearing Ratio of Cashflow at Risk to projected Cashflow

#BHP

NOTE: Other risks are also included to keep total risk within an acceptable level

Risk limits for strategic financial transactions
• • Stop loss Value at Risk Annual, Monthly and Quarterly $25m

Strategy in practice
Responsibility Governance and Policy Setting Authority Board

#BHP

Strategy Setting

Policy Committee supported by Market Risk Management function CFO for strategic financial transactions All activities subject to Board approved limits and monitoring

Execution*

Treasury Petroleum

Summary
• Manage risk at the portfolio level

#BHP
Understand portfolio characteristics Link capital allocation to portfolio risk



Manage risk to an acceptable level
Self insurance model Only hedge if you have to



Limited Strategic financial transactions
Markets under/over valued within agreed limits



Raise bar on communications
Clear, precise and responsive

Agenda
• Introduction • Strategy statement • Rationale • Strategy in practice • Communications

#BHP

What we will communicate
Will be disclosed Portfolio Risk • Policies – Annual statement, or as major policy changes occur; • Exposure profile; and • Information on outstanding hedge book – Quarterly update. Will not be disclosed

#BHP

• CFaR limits; • Modelling assumptions; and • Detailed transactions and transaction counterparties.

For strategic financial transactions • Quarterly performance • Rationale behind strategies; and update; and • Stop Loss Limits. • Value at Risk (VaR) and VaR limit – Quarterly Update.

Market Risk Management Strategy

#BHP

• Market Risk Strategy is consistent with BHP’s overall strategy • The outcome is simple, but its based on complex, quantitative analysis • Strategy works for BHP due to its low cost, diversified asset base • Tools become building blocks for decision-making beyond the market risk strategy

QUESTIONS

#BHP

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close