of 3

Blackburn v Attorney-General

Published on January 2017 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 18 | Comments: 0
210 views

Comments

Content


Organización Territorial Blackburn v Attorney-General 1
Blackburn v Attorney-General
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS: In this case Mr. Blackburn - as he has done beore - has
sho!n eternal "i#ilance in su$$ort o the la!. This ti%e he is concerned about the a$$lication
o Her Ma&est'(s )o"ern%ent to &oin the *o%%on Market and to si#n the Treat' o Ro%e. He
brin#s t!o actions a#ainst the Attorne'-)eneral+ in !hich he seeks declarations to the eect
that+ b' si#nin# the Treat' o Ro%e+ Her Ma&est'(s )o"ern%ent !ill surrender in $art the
so"erei#nt' o The *ro!n in ,arlia%ent and !ill surrender it or e"er. He sa's that in so doin#
the )o"ern%ent !ill be actin# in breach o the la!. The Attorne'-)eneral has a$$lied to strike
out the State%ents o *lai% on the #round that the' disclose no reasonable cause o action.
The Master and the -ud#e ha"e struck the% out. Mr. Blackburn+ !ith our lea"e+ a$$eals to this
*ourt. He thinks it is i%$ortant to clear the air.
Much o !hat Mr. Blackburn sa's is .uite correct. It does a$$ear that i this countr' should #o
into the *o%%on Market and si#n the Treat' o Ro%e+ it %eans that !e !ill ha"e taken a ste$
!hich is irre"ersible. The so"erei#nt' o these islands !ill thenceor!ard be li%ited. It !ill not
be ours alone but !ill be shared !ith others. Mr. Blackburn reerred us to a decision b' the
*ourt o *o%%on Market *osta ". E./.E.L. 01234 *o%%on Market La! Re$orts+ 4567 in
Februar'+ 1234+ in !hich the Euro$ean *ourt in its &ud#%ent said that:
8.....the %e%ber states+ albeit !ithin li%ited s$heres+ ha"e restricted their so"erei#n ri#hts and
created a bod' o la! a$$licable both to their nationals and to the%sel"es8.
Mr. Blackburn $oints out that %an' re#ulations %ade b' the Euro$ean Econo%ic *o%%unit'
!ill beco%e auto%aticall' bindin# on the $eo$le o this countr': and that all the *ourts o this
countr'+ includin# the House o Lords+ !ill ha"e to ollo! the decisions o the Euro$ean *ourt
in certain deined res$ects+ such as the construction o the Treat'.
I !ill assu%e that Mr. Blackburn is ri#ht in !hat he sa's on those %atters. /e"ertheless+ I do
not think these *ourts can entertain these actions. /e#otiations are still in $ro#ress or us to
&oin the *o%%on Market. /o a#ree%ent has been reached.
/o Treat' has been si#ned. E"en i a treat' is si#ned+ it is ele%entar' that these *ourts take
no notice o treaties as such. 9e take no notice o treaties until the' are e%bodied in la!s
enacted b' ,arlia%ent+ and then onl' to the e:tent that ,arlia%ent tells us. That !as settled in
a case about a treat' bet!een the ;ueen o En#land and the E%$eror o *hina. It is
Rusto%&ee ". The ;ueen 01<=3 5 ;.B.>. 327. Lord *olerid#e+ the then *hie -ustice said at
$a#e =4:
8She8 - that is The ;ueen - 8acted throu#hout the %akin# o the treat' and in relation to each
and e"er' o its sti$ulations in her so"erei#n character+ and b' her o!n inherent authorit'? and+
as in %akin# the treat'+ so in $eror%in# the treat'+ she is be'ond the control o %unici$al la!+
and her acts are not to be e:a%ined in her o!n *ourts8.
Mr. Blackburn ackno!led#ed the #eneral $rinci$le+ but he ur#ed that this $ro$osed treat' is in
a cate#or' b' itsel+ in that it di%inishes the so"erei#nt' o ,arlia%ent o"er the $eo$le o this
countr'. I cannot acce$t the distinction. The #eneral $rinci$le a$$lies to this treat' as to an'
UK
Organización Territorial Blackburn v Attorney-General 2
other. The treat'-%akin# $o!er o this countr' rests not in the *ourts+ but in the *ro!n? that is+
Her Ma&est' actin# u$on the ad"ice o her Ministers. 9hen Her Ministers ne#otiate and si#n a
treat'+ e"en a treat' o such $ara%ount i%$ortance as this $ro$osed one+ the' act on behal o
the countr' as a !hole. The' e:ercise the $rero#ati"e o *ro!n. Their action in so doin#
cannot be challen#ed or .uestioned in these *ourts.
Mr. Blackburn takes a second $oint. He sa's that+ i ,arlia%ent should i%$le%ent the Treat' b'
$assin# an Act o ,arlia%ent or this $ur$ose+ it !ill seek to do the i%$ossible. It !ill seek to
bind its successors. Accordin# to the Treat'+ once it is si#ned+ !e are co%%itted to it
irre"ocabl'. Once in the *o%%on Market+ !e cannot !ithdra! ro% it. /o ,arlia%ent can
co%%it us+ sa's Mr. Blackburn+ to that e:tent. He $ra's in aid the $rinci$le that no ,arlia%ent
can bind its successors+ and that an' ,arlia%ent can re"erse an' $re"ious enact%ent. He
reers to !hat ,roessor Maitland said about the Act o @nion bet!een En#land and Scotland.
,roessor Maitland in his *onstitutional Histor' o En#land said at $a#e AA5:
89e ha"e no irre$ealable la!s? all la!s %a' be re$ealed b' the ordinar' le#islature+ e"en the
conditions under !hich the En#lish and Scottish ,arlia%ents a#reed to %er#e the%sel"es in
the ,arlia%ent o )reat Britain8.
9e ha"e all been brou#ht u$ to belie"e that+ in le#al theor'+ one ,arlia%ent cannot bind
another and that no Act is irre"ersible. But le#al theor' does not al!a's %arch alon#side
$olitical realit'. Take the Statute o 9est%inster? 12A1+ !hich takes a!a' the $o!er o
,arlia%ent to le#islate or the >o%inions. *an an' one i%a#ine that ,arlia%ent could or !ould
re"erse that StatuteB Take the Acts !hich ha"e #ranted inde$endence to the >o%inions and
territories o"erseas. *an an'one i%a#ine that ,arlia%ent could or !ould re"erse those la!s
and take a!a' their inde$endenceB Most clearl' not. Freedo% once #i"en cannot be taken
a!a'. Le#al theor' %ust #i"e !a' to $ractical $olitics. It is as !ell to re%e%ber the re%ark o
Lord Sanke'+ Lord *hancellor+ in British *oal *or$oration ". The Cin# 0,.*. 12A6 A.*. 6DD7 at
$a#e 65D:
8The I%$erial ,arlia%ent could+ as %atter o abstract la!+ re$eal or disre#ard Section 4 o the
Statute o 9est%inster. But that is theor' and has no relation to realit'8.
9hat are the realities hereB I Her Ma&est'(s Ministers si#n this treat' and ,arlia%ent enacts
$ro"isions to i%$le%ent it+ I do not en"isa#e that ,arlia%ent !ould ater!ards #o back on it
and tr' to !ithdra! ro% it. But+ i ,arlia%ent should do so+ then I sa' !e !ill consider that
e"ent !hen it ha$$ens. 9e !ill then sa' !hether ,arlia%ent can la!ull' do it or not.
Both sides reerred us to the "aluable article b' ,roessor H.9.R. 9ade in the *a%brid#e La!
-ournal+ 1266+ at $a#e 123+ in !hich he said that 8so"erei#nt' is a $olitical act or !hich no
$urel' le#al authorit' can be constituted8. That is true. 9e %ust !ait to see !hat ha$$ens
beore !e $ronounce on so"erei#nt' in the *o%%on Market.
So+ !hilst in theor' Mr. Blackburn is .uite ri#ht in sa'in# that no ,arlia%ent can bind another+
and that an' ,arlia%ent can re"erse !hat a $re"ious ,arlia%ent has done+ ne"ertheless so ar
as this *ourt is concerned+ I think !e !ill !ait till that da' co%es. 9e !ill not $ronounce u$on
it toda'.
UK
Organización Territorial Blackburn v Attorney-General 3
A $oint !as raised as to !hether Mr. Blackburn has an' standin# to co%e beore the *ourt.
That is not a %atter u$on !hich !e need rule u$on toda'. He sa's that he eels "er' stron#l'
and that it is a %atter in !hich %an' $ersons in this countr' are concerned. I !ould not %'sel
rule hi% out on the #round that he has no standin#. But I do rule hi% out on the #round that
these *ourts !ill not i%$u#n the treat'-%akin# $o!er o Her Ma&est'+ and on the #round that
insoar as ,arlia%ent enacts le#islation+ !e !ill deal !ith that le#islation as and !hen it arises.
I think the state%ents o clai% disclose no cause o action+ and I !ould dis%iss the a$$eal.
LOR> [email protected]*E SALMO/: 9hilst I reco#nise the undoubted sincerit' o Mr. Blackburn(s
"ie!s+ I de$recate liti#ation the $ur$ose o !hich is to inluence $olitical decisions. Such
decisions ha"e nothin# to do !ith these *ourts. These *ourts are concerned onl' !ith the
eect o such decisions i and !hen the' ha"e been i%$le%ented b' le#islation. /or ha"e the
*ourts an' $o!er to interere !ith the treat'-%akin# $o!er o the So"erei#n. As to ,arlia%ent+
in the $resent state o the la!+ it can enact+ a%end and re$eal an' le#islation it $leases. The
sole $o!er o the *ourts is to decide and enorce !hat is the la! and not !hat it should be -
no!+ or in the uture.
I a#ree that this a$$eal should be dis%issed.
LOR> [email protected]*E STAM,: I a#ree that the a$$eal should be dis%issed? but I !ould e:$ress no
"ie! !hatsoe"er u$on the le#al i%$lications o this countr' beco%in# a $art' to the Treat' o
Ro%e. In the !a' Mr. Blackburn $ut it I think he conused the di"ision o the $o!ers o the
*ro!n+ ,arlia%ent and the *ourts. The *ro!n enters into treaties? ,arlia%ent enacts la!s?
and it is the dut' o this *ourt in $ro$er cases to inter$ret those la!s !hen %ade? but it is no
$art o this *ourt(s unction or dut' to %ake declarations in #eneral ter%s re#ardin# the $o!ers
o ,arlia%ent+ %ore $articularl' !here the circu%stances in !hich the *ourt is asked to
inter"ene are $urel' h'$othetical. /or ou#ht this *ourt at the suit o one o Her Ma&est'(s
sub&ects to %ake declarations re#ardin# the undoubted $rero#ati"e $o!er o the *ro!n to
enter into treaties.
Mr )OR>O/ SLE//: M' Lord+ there has been lea"e to a$$eal on each o these a$$eals+ and
these a$$eals !ill be dis%issedB
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS: Ees.
Mr )OR>O/ SLE9/: I ask that the a$$eals both be dis%issed !ith costs.
THE MASTER OF THE ROLLS: The a$$eals %ust be dis%issed !ith costs+ Mr. Blackburn.
Mr )OR>O/ SLE//: I a% %uch obli#ed+ %' Lord.
UK

Sponsor Documents


Recommended

No recommend documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close