Con Fraud

Confidential Fraud

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
family.uk-human-rights solicitorsfromhell.co.uk justiceraped.org /4suckers.htm MensAid /beware.htm dadscare.htm /confraud.htm theyknow.htm /solfraud.htm contract.htm /4deceit.htm sheknows.htm /convicti.htm forward.htm chancellor.htm converts.htm dssfraud.ht

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS (*Link *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for the targeted family)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court. The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and letters to a Chief Inspector of Police, one to solicitors and another to the Lord Chancellor Spell ORGANISED CRIMES (read the letter to the police in September 2006)
* I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES *Link thereafter to the Prime Minister's reference to the issue of Organised Crime in June 2005]

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (1 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS: Announcement- July 2002 1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as maintenance engineers of the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self-appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm - /4deceit.htm - /corruptcourts.htm - /convicti.htm - /chaldep1.htm /ukmm.htm & other organised groups who only aim to help themselves & serve the Fraudsters Club as in this page we cover, either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) accomplished mischief makers and recruits to CIUKU Enterprises. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their OBLIGATIONS in law provide, namely: - REPORT CRIMES & CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. [*Link to relevant law & provisions] KEY confraud.htm Page Changes 8 Oct. 2006
This Page is DEDICATED

Confidential Fraud

*Page Created October 1999* (page dedicated to the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM & the FnF)

Page Revised: February 23, 2009 : Introduced links to page from the page where we challenge & expose one Maurice Kellett, a self-promoting alleged expert on the parts of 'The Brotherhood', the contributions of Freemasons in 'building the society' he has been bolstering for over 10 years that we know of. Site re-construction for better navigation and inclusion of additional material.

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the re-construction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED by the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join others and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS

NOTE: The message below succinctly qualifies and clarifies the fact that citizens in the United Kingdom, and more than likely in other European countries and allegedly civilised West Influenced Pseudodemocracies, meet the cost of the rampant fraud covered in this page/file, through taxes AND THEY ARE KEPT IN THE DARK BY THE GOVERNMENTS THEY ELECT, to manage (on their behalf) *their country's affairs*. There exists an even darker side to the concept and the 'plans for the serfs in all pseudodemocracies'; victims of the legal circles and public servants (including the judiciary) entertain the invitation we point to below and themselves, thereafter, join the organisers of it all in and for 'the plundering of the family silver'. (*F3) In effect the arrangements in place, 'the condition' we point to below, amount to blackmail and it leads to conscious acquiescence of blunt frauds through the courts. Compensation paid to persons who succumb to the blackmail stipulation that we cover in this page constitutes also acceptance of fraudulently created demands on the budget, by the legal circles and judges who actively engage in the type of activities, such as we cover in another page. In that instance (as with other cases that we were made / are aware of) THE ACTIVITIES AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS : the defaults, omissions and contempt for the evidence and the law leading to the compensation paid to the victims merely because judicial chair occupants freely indulge in contempt of the law and the rights assured through it. OUR attempts (on several occasions) to publish the facts stated below, in the newsgroups, benefited from the attention of the moderators who used their guillotine & scissors. Arrogant violations in contempt of our rights to publish and act, as we do, in the public interest and as international law provides. Others, who frequent the newsgroups, also obstructed and interfered with the aforesaid rights; they do so either as the stooges of the offenders or as their partners in the deception and the constructive fraud industry we cover in this page/file. Below the REASON behind the propagation and perpetuation of fraud and corruption in and through our legal system. Most probably the same scenarios apply in other signatory countries of the European Convention on Human Rights. RECOGNISE THE FOUNDATION STONE, upon which rests the silence* of 'the real shysters' from within the United Kingdom.
[*Link from here to a House of Lords precedent case when their Lordships addressed the issue of conspiracy and what silence amounts to in

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (2 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

matters of deception & FRAUD]. Consider therfore the REAL reasons why:q q q q

Read first in this page the statement in respect of the case as submitted to the court and how / what we were prepared for, in order to establish one's and for all the elements and the evil forces at work. [*Link) Read the Statement of facts & Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of Live Beat Dads UK (*Link to www.lbduk.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded under par. 5.a & 5.b in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of dildo/ partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets through the courts, as targeted by the operators of the Divorce Industry, a division of CIUKU Enterprises! THE ABOVE IS DEDICATED TO ALLEGED LEADERS OF VICTIMS of Family Courts. To all others who FAILED to co-operate & WILFULLY INTERFERED IN ORDER TO OBSTRUCT & MAINTAIN the system of operations, which includes their parts as MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS (see below). We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the

q q q

'alleged victims of the system' engage, behind the scenes, in many an act of 'hypocrisy and sycophancy', they relish in 'evil-mongering' behind the scenes and, in private, they promote and assert 'many a foul word about the treatment they were/are subjected to, to new victims they meet and target!!! And CONVENIENTLY the poor dears DO NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS, while seeking to entice others in new-found areas of deceitful and fraudulent activities (*Link) through which (activities) the perpetuation of that which they set out to raise complaints about in the first instance, including lodging their complaints to the ECoHR.

The all important and crucial word, in the part we publish below, happens to be: *** "confidential" *** In other words:
q q q q q q

"YOU MUST NOT DISCLOSE THIS" ! [*Link from here to a House of Lords ruling on 'conspiracy', secret agreements] "YOU MUST KEEP QUIET ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT" !! [*Link from here to ] "The taxed contributors to the funds we are using - THE SUCKERS, must not get to know of this facility" !!! "Remember we have just BOUGHT YOUR SILENCE" !!!! "*** WELCOME TO THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB !!! ***" !!!!! "Remember, THE SYSTEM, IS SUPPORTED BY THE MEDIA. [*Link to promotion of falsehoods & sold to the system stooges]

Friends get to know of the fact that Article 38 - provides:
q q q

q

"1. If the court declares the application admissible, it shall: (a) pursue the examination of the case, ........... (b) place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the basis of RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS as defined in the Convention and the protocols thereto. 2. PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED UNDER PARAGRAPH 1.b SHALL BE 'confidential'."

>>> We underlined, above, the words 'respect for human rights' for the simple reason that the craft-y who 'allegedly' were concerning themselves with such elements COULD NOT CARE LESS about the rights of the citizens who are called upon to meet, through taxes, the constructive frauds on Mr and Mrs Average for the maintenance of public servants who entertain the corrupt and fraudsters who operate in our courts freely and as the police endorse and promote through defaults and omissions. <<< (*F5)
In a nutshell

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (3 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in law. Link to exclusive USE OF SUCH MATERIAL for VERY SUCCINCT CHALLENGES that caused abusers of the courts facilities to abandon their plans for a targeted victim - family.

q

q

q

YOU, friends, pay for THE FAT SALARIES of those who are RETAINED, ON YOUR BEHALF, and meant to protect you from crime and criminals. THEY, your servants, indulge in criminal activities with persons who operate from within the circles they, your servants, arose to occupation of judicial chairs. YOU, friends, then fork out for the silence of their new 'silent partners in the sharing of the budget funds, earmarked for the 'best legal system in the world, part of the CIUKU Enterprises, in the hands of the best organised STINGRAY OPERATORS.

ALL care of those who hold the all important positions of:
q q q q q q q q q

Victims of the family courts can refer to the cases we point to, above and they can invite us as witnesses to any court proceedings IF THEY FIRST STATE THEIR OWN CASE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN thereby indicating their own approval & participation in the declared AIMS of our founder as other victims adopted.
Interesting Press Release! It was published months late in the local press. The release months AFTER submissions to the Treasury, to the Prime Minister and press barons.

Minister for the police - Home Secretary 'Minister' for Judicial & Court Services - Lord Chancellor AND The Attorney General, The Director of Public Prosecutions, The Crown Prosecution Service, The Serious Fraud Office The Public Auditors The *fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose in our pages

NOT FORGETTING of course:
q q

The Condescending MEDIA BARONS AND THEIR STOOGES = reporters/editors

[*Link to FOOTNOTE where we cover very important cases that establish duplicity of purpose and if not organised crimes against humanity simply the element of free for all by split personalities who know not the rudiments and basic principles of law].

q

Access the case STATED at the European Court of Human Rights and recognise the scenario. We have publishing particulars and an important challenge arising out of the evidence 'the stooge of a victim' provided us with the solicitors and the courts she was working with while of opinion that they could all go on fooling us as they fool all others. The affidavit used by the fraudsters and other applicable evidence in the case did lead to our submissions to the Treasury in February 2002. Three properties were being converted to legal costs through theatrical productions over a few years; in one instance a FORGERY was used and plenty of False Instruments that were lacking accountability (by the authors / creators) used for the conversion / theft of the properties. ALL THE WHILE THE ALLEGED VICTIM part and parcel of the activities and as an ass, abusing our time wilfully negating on her agreement with us. She was simply using our assistance and facilities only for the reward under the table; one whose aims were to work as just another maintenance engineer of the arrangements in place, like those who sent along and guide the LIPS crowd/mob. Testing our resolve and patience, using our facilities for her and their fraudulent activities, her evil objectives. [*Link
to the page we released in 2004. There we publish the evidence against her and those she had been and was working with as a lover of the practices and as a committed 'fraudsters club recruit, like her mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob].

Now, consider those you knew and know of, WHO ACCUSE Mr and Mrs Average as shysters, because Mr and Mrs Average do not take up arms to challenge the maladministrators/operators of the legal, system in our country! In the meantime the 'shyster', name calling advocates', know full well that no one bothers to inform Mr and Mrs Average, of that which the advocates and the media barons shove under the carpets and or in the family closet. In the meantime some of the shyster name-calling 'gurus' [*Link to a page where we cover some aspects and a minor part of our experiences with one such guru'] having joined the fraudsters' club, we cover above, busy obstructing others from exercising their rights in law, to INFORM & EDUCATE the uninformed and kept in the dark 'serfs', the taxpayers. The most fundamental of rights such 'gurus' obstruct and object to, just the EXPOSURES AND THE EVIDENCE WE ARE (AND THEY SHOULD BE) PUBLISHING FOR THE WORLD TO NOTE and recognise the unacceptable activities of the criminals who are in

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (4 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

control of our legal system, the courts and the police. [*Link from here to an explicit extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight, 'The
Brotherhood'].

You read, above, the explicit and succinct provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore why there exist among those who
q q q q q q q q q q q q

visit the newsgroups, blow their trumpets about 'the system', proclaim their disaffection and 'disgust at the practices' in the courts, in order to attract / phish new victims to whom they assert personal knowledge and experiences, YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to inform and prove to Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!! YET they fail to challenge & expose abusers of judicial chair occupation and the courts facilities, as we do. In the meantime, and for over 12 YEARS, the leaders / managers of the LIPS crowd/mob ignoring provisions of The Criminals Justice Act 1988, we pointed them to, as soon as they contacted Andrew, when they got to know of 'The CAMILA Project'. [*Link
from here to the page where we publish the relevant Sections of the Act that clarifies : the commission of the crime irrelevant if through an ACT OR AN OMISSION].

WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?
Read the article from the North London weekly Post (Link) and consider that persons who run around promoting the abuse of the courts' facilities are just promoting the criminal activities when they default at the same time to challenge the obvious, in the public domain. When they promote also the defaults and omissions by and from other public servants AND OFFER to assist any victim it is a sure sign that the promoter / volunteer is but an endorser of the wrongs and criminal activities. In the circumstances failing to challenge and expose the wrongs IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN leads to 'conscious accessories and abettors to new criminal activities especially because they offer to assist any other to benefit from the arrangements covered above.

And the victims(!) who just default to act as law abiding citizens, aim for WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE that one such person was more interested in persuading a victim, who was publishing the facts of life on the Internet, to membership of the remove the evidence. The culprit acted deviously and promoted falsehoods about a mate of his; none other than Johan, the telephone call instigator fraudsters' club, we cover and the Rt. Hon. Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob Norman Scarth. The latter, had joined the fraudsters club and he later persuaded the publishing in this page. Joining in the victim to remove the evidence from the Internet. At the same time he deceived(?) and caused(!) the victim, who benefited from much, to interfere in our scams, as seasoned and work. Another, victim, was also caused to join in the scam orchestrated by the 2 LIPS protagonists in deception. OF SUCH PERSONS His Lordship was tutored recruits for more of speaking when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999, about his baby, the Legal Services Commission the wolf the same with new victims (Legal Aid Pack) re-packaged as the Legal Services Commission. in the scripts prepared for them. The enterprising who are in control of Law We urge all conscientious citizens, who have suffered damages, at and through the courts, because of the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, Enforcement in our to consider their rights and to act as the law provides. Access the page for information on how to challenge, expose and claim back rights denied & country as contemptuous obstructed as part of a group who has seen light. [*Link from here to page with information] of the law as the criminals they were / are retained to Go To: http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/attempts.htm & read the APPEAL (specifically the last order sought on appeal) because it caused deal with. Do access the the Lord Chancellor and the Government to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997. Such FACTS & REALITIES while the persons who contacted Andrew, Divorce Lawyer Admits as leaders and managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, were just looking forward to AND WORKING FOR MORE OF THE SAME, using others Fraud page/file. Then for the conscious and intended double constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we point to, expose and cover exclusively in this page. consider that the victim in file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (5 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

that case indulged in many a deception and theatre. More facts and evidence are to be published in our pages. It was but a typical example of the scenarios enacted by such persons through the courts, care of the TRIAD in control of it all. Through the exclusive exchanges with another who had other plans for the system which they allegedly were all out to expose and raise the red flags for, both as far removed from the exposures as the earth from the centre of the universe. Neither one was all out for that which they were asserting and alleging in private. Both after the scenario covered in this page. Seasoned mimics and creators of theatrical scripts. Below, a typical example of HOW SOLICITORS WORK with one another and use clients in order to engineer constructive frauds on the budget through the scheme & arrangements in place which we cover in this page. Their audacity knows no bounds. One solicitor to another "Oh, no, we do not want an offer from you for the damages you caused to our client. We expect of the taxpayers to make good the damages AND OUR CLIENT AGREES WITH US. He decided to join 'the fraudsters club'

If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide. Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who act in contempt of the law. Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights, yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such provisions. They fail to protect you as the law and their duties provide. Through their defaults and blunt omissions, in the exercise of their public duties, they actually torment and torture you, the victims of crime. Precisely as they did in the Stephen Lawrence shameful fiasco. Their failures to prosecute the playmates of the local authority, the scoundrels who steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds, through false instruments is but a typical example of 'which parties they serve in an alleged democracy, one that is sold to the world (through self promotion) as one that allegedly rests and is founded on 'Law & Order'. READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which you do, does not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". © A.Y, 1972-1975 'The Years of Discovery'.
q q

q

q

CAN the parties who fall within the above category, ever, really justify and or explain their conscious part in the constructive frauds industry? CAN 'the real shysters' STATE IF, before electing to join 'the fraudsters club' THEY CONSIDERED THE ABOVE SIMPLE FOUNDATION FOR ALL LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS, as defined by the founder of *human-rights* the Non Governmental Organisation? 'One Begins With Logic' : Heraclitus' principle as interpreted by Andrew when a teenager, and ever since the basis of all that touched his life. (In Greek: sounds like "N R He In Oh Law-was") We publish in the left margin/window the names of allegedly concerned citizens. The majority, if not all, have been serving the system as is as 'Subliminal Indoctrination Agents' for 'the system as is' and the subconscious promotion of 'the powers of the abductors and rapists of Justice'. We explain: 'They bombard the victims they target (inclusive of postings in the News Groups) in order to draw their readers' attention to 'their views'. The opinions' they promote, relentlessly, simply act as indirect 'conclusive proof' that there is nothing 'the serfs' can do. The proof lays in the obvious messages that are derived from their repetitious promotions of: "Do not do as I did and do, because they -the criminals who ARE in control in pseudo-democracies- will do to you, what they did to me'. The best and classic example being none other than the puke production machine, James Todd of 'VOMIT' repute.

Official records: Addenda in the right lower corner of the box the list. In cover it all NOTE: Friendly settlement followed by removal of the petition fromqualify, ha, the meantime letters to the fraudsters-club-recruits alleging case did not ha!

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (6 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

for the usual operations through the courts. We can all (the legal circles) point him to our victims, just as we pointed Mr. Hussein, the one who initiated him - Mr Johan M R Foenander - to our system of operations.

ALL law abiding citizens who object to being treated as serfs of the Middle Ages or as slaves of earlier times, all family persons who have been struggling to raise their off-spring, all creative and aspiring peoples everywhere, are invited to read very carefully the content of this page and access also the Readers & researchers are challenge to the European Court of Human Rights* [*Link from here to the challenges & NOTE THE LAW requested to access the pointed to the European Court of Human Rights] after reading the entire content of this page. pages where we expose
named lovers and promoters / users of the arrangements in place for more of the same. This link takes visitors to such a scenario, a letter in the left margin. Read the evidence in the form of a letter from one solicitor to another and note the implied arrogance of the solicitor. DO NOTE THE FAIR COMMENT warranted and DO NOT OVERLOOK THE SIMPLE FACT that 'the victim' in that instance was contacted by another fraudster who was sent along by solicitors in order to initiate that moron to the system of operations as covered in this page. the circumstances. Victims, researchers are invited to contact the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides for additional information. The addenda in the right hand lower corner covers the elements this page relates to. [NOTE:
Readers should consider the above before accepting promotions by alleged victims whose cases allegedly were thrown out by the ECrtHR]
q

The challenge was called for after the Court, through its UK section staff and officers wrote to inform a victim of the organised RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE COURTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, that the three judges, who looked at the case (after the rapporteur passed the case file on) determined that not all avenues had been exhausted in the United Kingdom, the case could not be accepted. [*Link to the process in respect of the admissibility and who / how determines note singular]

q

q

q

Let the above realities be a lesson to non-legal Members of Parliament and to other charlatans whose plans are to cash in / use the system as is just like the fraudsters club recruits we name in our pages.

q

The petitioner was also informed, by the court, that the submitted documents / file would be destroyed in a year's time, HENCE THE CHALLENGES to the Court . The petitioner had been informed that the pleadings were presented to the court in a way that after the door had been opened (court received the petition) the usual smoke-screen could not be applied. AFTER the challenge was received and the documents were rushed back to the 'victim'(!), the petitioner was asked to issue a Power of Attorney to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order that the case could be progressed accordingly, at national level & within Europe. The petitioner 'honoured her agreement with Mr A. Yiannides', the founder of human-rights by delivering up to him all of her documents, and left the United Kingdom without ever bothering to issue the warranted and agreed upon Power of Attorney, which Mr Yiannides needed in order to proceed as HE HAD PLANNED at the time when he was settling the pleadings which he personally delivered to the European Court of Human Rights by travelling all the way to Strasbourg, by coach.
(No prizes for guessing why)

q

Above what one convert to and lover of the blunt fraud on the taxpayers engaged in. Below just another dreamer who engaged in many theatrical productions, simply for the creation of false instruments with the attached legal costs charges. The obvious hinted at to the fraud of an alleged victim challenger. Intriguing she too, conveniently DID NOT proceed with the exposures she agreed to engage in with assistance in order to

q

A STATEMENT by Mr. Andrew Yiannides will be released in due course because the promotion and propositions by the English Section at the European Court were more than out of order when one considers THE PLEADINGS AS DELIVERED TO & LODGED AT THE COURT, WITH THE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. Readers / researchers and or any person who takes an interest in the matters we cover in this page & specifically any media baron or conscientious reporter who wishes to assist with promotion and exposure of the realities covered in this page should read the copyright notice at the bottom of all pages at this web-site and contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides / the webmaster. (Read below the provisions
and practice under Article 28 before the UK was caused to introduce the Bill of Rights after a Local Authority was challenged for its parts in arrogant fraud on targeted citizens because of its liabilities / duties to assist in the creation of the melting pot as determined and commanded by non-elected 'dictators' of the most obnoxious and evil kind - followers of the pre-determined plans for the sons of men -humans- of planet earth).

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (7 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

attend to her OBLIGATIONS to society, the taxpayers as provided for under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights [*Link
to the relevant provisions under Art. 6]

FOOTNOTE SPECIAL relative to the above material and evidence
Readers & researchers are pointed to the fact that the United Kingdom, at the conclusion of World War 2 hostilities, had to borrow funds from the USA banking leeches in order to rebuild and restructure the country and society. Loans with USA government support; the usual guarantees to the leeches from and by 'the representatives of the serfs' in all pseudo democracies; governments (agents of the citizens), committing the serfs to meet the cost of all interest charges and the capital (borrowed funds) through taxes. In the instance at hand the funds were called for and warranted in order for the government of the day to proceed with its plans for these islands and its inhabitants. WE SIMPLY POINT OUT THAT THE LOAN WAS NOT PAID OFF UNTIL 2007, some 62 years later. THE SERFS ARE REMINDED REGULARLY (by the media and the opposition of the respective political coloration representatives of the day) THAT THE STATE / COUNTRY IS RUN & MANAGED ON EXTENSIVE BORROWINGS granted by the leeches..... and WE HAVE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS RELISHING & WORKING FOR THE PLUNDERING OF TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGH THE ORGANISED RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES WE POINT TO IN THIS PAGE. We publish and point - in other pages- to additional evidence applicable to the blunt and arrogant criminal activities such persons engage in as 'the dancing partners of the abusers of the courts facilities' >>> a typical example the letter from one solicitor to another in the left margin / window linked to from here [*L1]. The very solicitor, years earlier, engaged with another solicitor in attempts to convert rents owing to a landlord care of organised fraud instigated through abuse of public office by staff and officers (in charge of the organised disorganisation in full swing at Haringey Council, a Local Authority / Local Government, in North London) linked to from here [*L2].

Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on 'the taxpaying serfs' ?
Daily Mail, Saturday, May 24, 2003 - the John Palmer: Timeshare scam
*Link from here to the page where we state the parts of the dreamer who was acting in tandem with the legal circles. She also failed to report a blunt PERJURY, on affidavit, by the solicitor who was representing, on S.I.F instructions, the solicitors the dreamer instigated proceedings against.

Legal blunder ? Error ?

Goldfinger' to keep £33m in legal blunder
By Alexandra Buller ONE of Britain's most notorious criminals will be allowed to pocket more than £33 million from his timeshare scams because of an error by judges. John `Goldfinger' Palmer was jailed for eight years in 2001 for tricking thousands of holidaymakers out of their life savings. He was ordered to pay back the haul but appealed and was allowed to keep the money after the judge's confiscation order was overturned by the Appeal Court last July. Yesterday Lord Woolf, Britain's most senior judge, ruled that this decision was wrong and that the appeal judges had `misunderstood and misapplied the law'. But Palmer can still keep the fortune he made from the Tenerife timeshare scam because the original decision to quash the confiscation order cannot legally be overturned.

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (8 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on the taxpayers?

Last night Norman Brennan, a serving police officer and director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: `Who has got any faith left in the British criminal justice system? `Who said crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer. `A lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives lost their life savings and at the end of the day his sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway. `Now Palmer is sticking two finger up to all of us and the courts are allowing him to do it.'(*Link to other arrogant
fraudsters that we wrote of in late 1999, who were sticking their two fingers up to the taxpayers who pay taxes to maintain criminals in judicial chairs and contemptuous of the law 'Law Enforcing Agents').

Access the article in HTML (Links to & from) in the main window, read it all, also the FOUR comparative cases that we point to in the FOOTNOTE. CONSIDER then the parts of the Fraudsters Club Recruits we expose and covered in this page. In the final analysis one MUST CONSIDER the self created roles of the judiciary to act as the Protectors Of CRIMINALS (*Link to proof).

BELOW two explicit articles both of which mainline news AFTER we reported to the government the activities in which a victim(?) of the legal circles and the abusers of judicial chair occupation, WAS OBSERVED & NOTED TO HAVE BEEN PLAYING THE FIELD FOR THE RAMPANT CORRUPTION AS COVERED IN THIS PAGE. (*Link to the page

Palmer, 53, was ordered to pay back £33,243,812 after being convicted at the Old Bailey of conspiracy to defraud thousands of victims - mainly elderly people. But this order was overturned by the Appeal Court on the basis that there had been crucial flaws in the procedure followed. Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday said the case had been 'wrongly decided' and Palmer was not entitled to the money. But the crook will still be able to keep it because the appeal judges last November blocked an attempt by the Director of Public Prosecutions to take the case to the House of Lords - the only court with power to quash the ruling. The decision in Palmer's case sparked panic in prosecution circles and Lord Woolf said there had been `at least ten' test cases on the issue. He ruled that Palmer's case had been wrongly decided, during a hearing of another confiscation case involving VAT fraud before a specially constituted five-judge Appeal Court. Lord Woolf said: `This Court considers that the law was misunderstood and misapplied in Palmer.' He said it was `not a course to be taken lightly' for a court to rule that a `series of cases' had been decided wrongly, but said he hoped that this would `put an end to the string of appeals' against confiscation orders sparked by the Palmer case. (*F4) Palmer earned notoriety and the nickname `Goldfinger' after being acquitted of handling gold from the Brink's-Mat robbery at Heathrow in 1983. After his acquittal he moved to Tenerife and set up the time-share business with his lover Christine Ketley, of Brentwood, Essex, who was also convicted of conspiracy to defraud. His victims in the timeshare fraud handed over more than £30 million, but never received their share of a holiday home in the sun. Palmer's wealth was estimated at around £270 million last year by the Sunday Times Rich List, making him one of Britain's wealthiest men. He is a close friend of Kenneth Noye and is believed to have flown him to the safety of the Spanish coast by helicopter after Noye stabbed Stephen Cameron to death on the M25 in 1996.
[email protected] © Associated Newspapers Ltd.

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (9 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

where we cover the activities & publish evidence that establishes the victim's parts in the constructive frauds & Link to an affidavit covering the billions paid out annually as rewards in many instances to persons who play the field in tandem with the legal circles).

Arrogantly ORGANISED FRAUD on the taxpayers [*Link]
q

q

Convention & Protocols to it, a list of States & Dates of Recognition of The Rights Of Citizens As INDIVIDUALS TO SUBMIT PERSONAL PETITIONS TO THE ECHR

q

On the left image of the cover of the 1996 edition of the Convention as posted to petitioners by the Commission. On the right image from page 8 where Article 28 made clear the Commission's practice. All had been and was in conformity with the universal declaration and COMMITMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE THAT JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE. [Read below] The principle simply shoved under the carpets, the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes we contacted over the years (as of 1972), have been shoving their heads in the sand and acting as accessories and abettors by suppressing the realities born of the Constructive frauds through abuse of public office as we cover also in the Housing Benefit organised fraud, by staff and officers of Local Authorities. Worse, alleged victims who knew and know of the blunt confidential plundering of budget funds as covered in this page, contemptuously suppressing their own knowledge of the abused facility AS LOVERS & USERS OF IT ALL whose priorities shifted from, "Challenge the abusers of the courts' facilities, to active participants and promoters / users of the system as is'.

The provision and the practice under Article 28 very clearly stated in 1996. The fundamental principle as practised at and by the Commission MAKING IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE TAXPAYERS WERE DULY INFORMED OF PETITION & RESULTS

Article 28
1. In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to it:
q

Access the realities as to how and when the press release, below, by the government.

q

a. it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake together with the representatives of the parties an examination of the petition and, if need be, an investigation, for the effective conduct of which the States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities, after an exchange of views with the Commission. b. it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for human rights as defined in this Convention.

2. If the Commission succeeds in effecting a friendly settlement, it shall draw up a report which shall be sent to the States concerned, to the Committee of Ministers and to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe for publication. This report shall be confined to a brief statement of the facts and of the solution reached.

Access also the proof we publish relevant to the fact that politicians in allegedly civilised states agreed to suppress the criminal in intent abuse of the legal system and the courts FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE SERFS & THE TAXPAYERS IN

ABOVE PROOF THAT OUR SERVANTS AGREED & ARE PARTY TO SUPPRESSION OF THE FACTS relative to the 'organised frauds on the taxpayers' care also of the many stooges and lovers of the system such as 'the fraudsters club recruits we point to in this page' and the persons named in the list at the bottom of most pages at this web-site. READERS, RESEARCHERS and sucker-victims (accosted and being used by fraudsters-club-recruits / encouraged to go for the carrot at the end of the line like asses) consider the cost to the generations to come..... to be taxed FOR THE INTEREST & CAPITAL REPAYMENT OF SUCH ARROGANT CONCEPTS & CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE ANNUAL BUDGETS dear reader

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (10 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

GENERAL, as we point to in this exclusive page, while the media barons and the INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES THEY RETAIN AND MAINTAIN CARRY ON ACTING AS BLIND DEAF AND MONKEYS AS THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE INDULGE. We point above to a press release by the government. A front page article published in 'The Independent' some months AFTER we reported, to the government our observations in respect of the part of yet 'another LIPS fraudster. She consciously engaged in the DOUBLE FRAUD exclusively EXPOSED by us in this page (*Link to the proof). Through the courts, constructive Frauds on 'the budget', on 'the serfs', on 'the taxpayers'. She had given us more than enough grounds to raise the alarm and to REPORT THE CRIMES AS INTENDED BY HER AND THOSE SHE WAS WORKING WITH. Defaults aplenty and PREMEDITATED ACTIVITIES.

BELOW EVIDENCE RELEASED BY THE GOVERNMENT after we reported the fraudster and lover of the system as is, Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, for her blunt parts in the constructive frauds through the courts AND HER EVIL ABUSE OF OUR TIME while promoting false undertakings and alleged intentions TO EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS SHE WAS WORKING WITH for the implementation of the 'intended and worked-for' rewards for MORONS OF HER MENTALITY TO MR & MRS AVERAGE, the taxpayers.

TAXES for mistakes & errors, BUT TAXES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS?
Do read this entire page and consider the arrangements by the controllers / creators of such facilities. Consider then the £12.3 billion covered in the article on the left. Press releases to soften the blow OR to prepare the citizens for the skeletons in the family closet? Read the article and then read the explicit affidavit we publish in this page. It was called for because of abuse of the courts' facilities in the promotion of Housing Benefit thefts & conversions. READ and consider the scenarios we cover in this page. Access the explicit page covering the fact that £12.3 billion in one an alleged victim, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden, who was introduced to *human-rights* had been involved in year, including the type many a theatrical production. The person was simply promoting, through crocodile tears, her devastation of rewards to stooges & at the hands of the legal circles. However, through many a default and omission the alleged victim was charlatans we point to seen to be party to the scams until, eventually, her true colours shone through. We simply reported the and expose in this and scam to the Treasury and we have since begun to publish the evidence that establishes her parts in the other pages. constructive frauds we cover in this and other pages. (*F2)

Institutionalised & Organised FRAUDS, as recognised 34 years earlier [*Link to FORGERY in High Court case]

The article on the left relates to Organised FRAUDS through the institutions created and maintained by the European Union. Even the person who was appointed to investigate the criminal activities was pressured to keep it all under wraps and then transferred to another project.
[*Link to EU Law on Fraud]

[*Link

to the element of blackmail, that victims of the abused court facilities are subjected to; also to convert-lovers of the rampant fraud who accost & USE other victims, and keep the taxpayers in the dark]

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (11 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
BELOW THE HEADLINES COVER WRONGDOING AND TAXES FOR COMPENSATION ARISING OUT OF UNACCEPTABLE PRACTICES BY PERSONS IN PUBLIC OFFICE, THE POLICE.

The above realities, were reported by the media consequential to our reports to The Treasury, to The Home Office & to The Prime Minister. The reports and submissions were called for after a typical fraudsters club recruit was caught at it and exposed as a participating play-mate in the constructive frauds on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts facilities. [*Link to the page where we published our explicit
submissions to government, *Link to the page where we published evidence of PERJURY BY A SOLICITOR which the alleged victim of the constructive frauds through the courts shoved in the dark corners of her corrupted mind. *Link to the page where we published evidence when an abuser of judicial chair occupation arrogantly asserted (indirectly) WE (the legal circles) have finished with you, in the United Kingdom, just get on with it and seek your reward from the European Court of Human Rights..... hence THE EVIL PERSON'S FAILURES TO MAKE PUBLIC THE FACTS OF LIFE and the activities she was party to and a willing playmate in & for]

The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna Carta, in England. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights freedoms and obligations, as clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).
q q

WE EXPECT OF THE PERSONS WHO CONSIDER IT THEIR DUTY TO PUBLICISE HOW TAXES ARE USED FOR COMPENSATION TO THE VICTIMS, TO SIMILARLY INFORM THE TAXPAYERS OF THE FACTS AND REALITIES WE PUBLISH IN THIS EXCLUSIVE PAGE. THE TEXT OF THE ARTICLE WAS OCR'd THIS IMAGE ALSO IN THE PAGE YOURTAX WITH THE OCR'd ARTICLE FOR LINKS TO ^ FROM OTHER PAGES AND WEB-SITES, WHERE THE PRACTICES OF AND BY PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE REPORTED / EXPOSED. (*Link to new page) KEY to Page & Site - List LOCAL COUNCIL FRAUDS Page CHANGES - List RIGHTS In Legal Terms FRAUD : Definitions CRIME PAYS - confirmed FRAUDSTERS CLUB - List Public Agents To ACCOUNT The ISSUES - Introduction. LETTERS TO - Link to List LETTERS FROM - Link to List Other SITES EXPOSING - List 1. This Page 2. Site-Pages Intro. - List 3. Other Sites- Introducing

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q

q q q

1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness. 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly therefrom. 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law. 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe. 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions, and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents. 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby. Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance. 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied. 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the person of the accused must be severely repressed by law. 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by law. 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write, and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law. 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted. 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally on all citizens in proportion to their means. 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration. 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration. 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all. 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.

Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note, above, the obvious: Society,

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (12 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
4. Quotes - A-Z Index 5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods 6. Personalities - Quotes 7. Press Media - Hypocrites 8. Institutionalised FRAUD 9. Local Authorities Fraud 10. 12.3 Billion Compensation & An Affidavit Years Ahead 11. Public Servants Instigate Fraud - Rampant Corruption 12. Relying On Local Courts 13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL 14. Police & False Information Compensation Industry List WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons 1. EU Public Sector FRAUD 2. TAXES for Compensation 3. Lawyers Appalling Service 4. Page link to MEDIA Page 5. AWARDS to INSIDERS <> Page CHANGES - List Added articles - scans EU Public Sector FRAUD TAXES for Compensation Lawyers Appalling Service Page link to MEDIA Page <> The Issues Compensation Industry - List 1. Fraud - Affidavit & PROOF 2. Criminals Interfere in N/G 3. The Real Shysters. 4. Hypocrisy - Sycophancy 5. Complain, Yet Do Nothing 6. Enticing Others In Deceit 7. Relish In Evil-Mongering 8. Many A Foul Word 9. Article 38 Provision 10. Defaults & Omissions 11. Offenders Ignore Law 12. Police/Judges Ignore Law 13. Stephen Lawrence. 14. Name Calling Advocates 15. The Real Silent Shysters 16. Lawyers Milking System 17. Money Under The Table 18. Billions in compensation 19. Fraud For Compensation

CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER ADMINISTRATION. The *human-rights* DECLARATION challenge, was born of the above principles and the most fundamental principle of and for unadulterated 'Justice', the principle of "JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE"as clarified by the European Court of Human Rights. NOTE:
q

q

q

q

q

q

The affidavit below was settled and lodged at court when CHALLENGING the rampant free for all (*1) in the thefts, the misappropriation and the organised constructive frauds instigated by the staff and officers of Local Authorities (*2). Visitors, readers and researchers should note that the staff and officers at the local county court simply indulged as promoters and accessories of the criminal activities (*3). Obstructing 'Justice' and denying / violating the rights (*4) of targeted citizens, the main thrust of the 'enterprising' (*5). And the police (*6), beneficiaries in the Housing Benefit Scams, also breaching their public duties and acting in contempt of the law, through blunt defaults and omissions (*7). The affidavit (as published below) was sent to certain 'victims' whose activities and defaults indicated they were only interested in joining the fraudsters club (*1), as opposed to 'reporting and exposing apropos' (*2) the criminals who were and are in control of the Law Enforcement Agencies that successive governments have maintained in the United Kingdom, at the expense of the citizens (*3). Promoting and ignoring the arrogance (*1) of the police who fail to prosecute criminals, as we cover in our pages, was and remains the central and pivotal argument and script 'the new recruits' of 'the fraudsters club' relentlessly recite. All produce, interestingly, unchallenged communications which 'instruments' only a few follow up (*2) through and at the offending beehives (*3). Contempt for the law and all evidence (*1), for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises is but the cornerstone of the society the corrupt and corrupters have been creating for centuries. The clearly pleaded BILLIONS by way of compensation under the counter, as provided for and clarified above, should cause the maligned hypocrites and sycophants to land on terra firma. Their main pre-occupation had been and was to obstruct the truth from being told and the realities from being exposed to the world. Their only aim: "To join the fraudsters' club and 'To use the system of operations', as we cover in our explicit 'two LIPS talking' page, for personal gain, through fraud endorsed and acquiesced. Consider that since we reported to the TREASURY the blunt arrogance and rampant fraudulent activities as entered into by the legal circles in January 2002, and thereafter much has been released to the press by way of 'activities and propositions as well as acknowledgement of 'white collar fraud'. Activities as entertained by 'public servants' who purportedly are 'serving justice' are nothing but constructive frauds on the budget - TAX PAYERS as we cover in this file/page. Access the report (*1) and the words we link you to (*2). Then recognise why the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved to the Treasury after our succinct submissions there and to the Prime Minister following the events covered in the exclusive page/file we link you to (*3).
Sworn by: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This is the FIRST Affidavit filed on behalf of THE DEFENDANTS by the Deponent on................. In the Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Case No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

GENERAL FORM OF AFFIDAVIT PLAINTIFF Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx DEFENDANTS: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (13 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
Page Quotes 1. Torment And Torture 2. Publish In Public Interest 3. Perpetuation of Fraud 4. Corrupted Legal System 5. The Foundation Stone 6. The Fraudsters Club 7. Crucial Word:'Confidential' 8. Must Not Disclose This 9. Your Servants Indulge 10. Stingray Operators 11.Accuse Mr&Mrs Average 12. Exercise Your Rights 13. Expose The Offenders 14. Parliament Provided 4U 15. Citizen Is Duty Bound 16. All Care Of Those Who 17. Blow Their Trumpets 18. Disgust At Practices 19. Partners In Deception 20. 'Crime Pays' (say police) 21. The REAL SHYSTERS .. Definitions 1. deceit & deception 2. duplicity 3. impostor 4. pretender 5. racket 6. sham

I Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, of XXxxxxxxxx XXXX in the Xxxxxxxx Borough of Xxxxxxx, legal author and lecturer of law MAKE OATH and say as follows:1. I was born in Xxxxxxxx in the village of Xxxxxxxxx in the district of Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on XX Xxxx 1936 and have resided in the United Kingdom as and of 5/11/1979 and as a citizen of the United Kingdom as of 19/7/1997. 2. In my early years I served as a shepherd (looking after the family herd) followed by studies at a hieratical seminary; and following military studies I served as a commissioned officer in the Xxxxxxxxx National Army. 3. As of 1960 I have been a practising lawyer and have been serving as a reporter; I have published books and works on legal matters, dissertations, treatises, reports, and have submitted opinions on legal matters. 4. I served with the United Nations Organisation (1979) the European Common Market, at the European Council, as the attorneyat-law of the "Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the United Nations", a Non Governmental Organisation the legal status and persona of which has been recognised by the European Commission (Strasbourg) as of XXxx Xxxxxx 1986. 5. As of Xxx Xxxxx 1984 I am the President and legal adviser of the aforementioned N.G.O and as of XXxx Xxxxxxx 1995 I am a member of the Union of Lawyers of London (membership number XXXX). 6. Following written submissions by The CAMILA Project on Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 and on XXxx Xxxxxxxxxx 1997, the administrative council of the XXXXXXXX (N.G.O - paragraph 4 above) through its directive 1-126 instructed me to submit legal opinion in the matter of an Order/determination by District Judge Xxxxxxx sitting in private in the case XXXXXXXXXX on XXxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 issued on the day while neither party to the action was present and or took part in the proceedings; I submit hereto below my opinions and findings. 7. Upon reference to International Treaties and Conventions, case-law, precedent cases on International Justice, etc. I determined that the above stated decision/ruling/Order of District Judge Xxxxx is null and void, unenforceable, false and or a forgery, unprecedented, and a by-product of "XXXXXXX" practices within the Judicial Services/System maintained by the United Kingdom and that it constitutes an insult in the annals of Justice, to the integrity of Justice, the intelligence of the citizens and that it makes mockery of the United Kingdom Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Union and the Council of Europe all of which legislated and ratified Treaties and International Agreements, and because:(1) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" that was ratified by the United Kingdom at the United Nations in 1966, (New York). (2) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the Universal Declaration of the United Nations which were adopted on 10/12/1948 by the U.N.O following the establishment of the United Nations on 26th June 1945 in San Francisco. (3) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Treaty of Rome as was entered into on 25th March 1957 by the participating nations of the European Economic Community, and subsequently were endorsed by the United Kingdom.

deceit / deception deception ? Could any citizen, who benefited from a very positive first meeting with any solicitor and then arranged for the transfer of his/her papers from another member of the Law Society, another solicitor who failed him/her, and then found himself /herself in the same stranglehold, consider how he/she was caused to transfer to the new solicitor as nothing else but the results of deception ? One only has to consider the tribulations of the divorce victim's case as stated in the appeal published in our

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (14 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

HomePages at: /corruptcourts.htm 'duplicity' 2purposes? Can any citizen whose legal representatives (acting as agents in court proceedings through their subcontracted and appointed by the agents, barristers, who then act as agents for the agents at court) indulging in private and undisclosed blunt arrangements with the opposition's agents, be anything else ? Especially when both sides, in any dispute, are securing 'pecuniary advantage over their respective clients through and with the blessings of judicial chair occupants as covered in the material facts and with the documented evidence being published at: law.society.complaints

(4) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Mastrich Treaty as was adopted on 7 February 1992 and amended on 16 July 1997 and has been in force as of 1 November 1993. (5) The Order specifically contravenes and violates articles X-XX of the European Convention of the Council of Europe that was adopted in Rome on 4 November 1950. (6) The aforementioned Universal / International Declarations, Conventions and Treaties have been endorsed, adopted and or ratified by the United Kingdom (as of 10/12/1948,14/1/1966, etc.) and prevail over all conflicting and or contravening United Kingdom Statutory Act, Law and or any Order arising out of the United Kingdom Constitution of 1764 (or of any other individual member of the U.N.O) such as article 103 of the U.N.O Charter (26/6/1945) article XXX, paragraph X of the European Economic Community and articles X, XX, XX, XX, XX of the above Treaty, X (X), specifically provide. (7) As of 14/1/1966 to-date the United Kingdom has been caused by the European Commission on Human Rights to accept that some 1200 violations lodged with the Commission were well founded and accepted by the United Kingdom without reference to the Court itself and or were determined by the Court of the Commission to have been proven; and the (uninformed) citizens of the United Kingdom, en masse, as revenue providers have had to make good damages and or to compensate the victims of British Judges in the sum of some f 4,500.000,000 because of similar practices and or orders such as the one appealed against by the Defendants in the action XXXXXXXXX which was referred to me, which Order in any event, (8) Is null and void because it was entered into in the absence of both parties; and because District Judge Xxxxx through silence endorses the Claim yet seeks to suppress the Counterclaim thereby provoking the Defendants and Justice itself; also because on the one hand the Judge declares neither party was in attendance yet on the other asserts that the matter before the court was an ex parte application, as if one party was present. (as a test to students of court practice ?). (9) and furthermore, even if the Counterclaim was deemed vague and or was rejected on grounds that Court Fees were not

pretender' pretender ? remitted, on its own the Order is null and void because the Judge failed to state the grounds upon which he quietly endorsed the Could any citizen who has Claim yet rejected the Counterclaim in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992. been accosted / approached by alleged victims of the system, (10) and finally the proceedings were null and void because the Defendants were not Summonsed before the Court; presumably seeking help and or forged proof of service was used (a criminal offence). offering assistance, subsequently seen to (11) District Judge Xxxxx specifically violated section X(X) of "The European Communities Act 1972" which specifically provides have been acting exactly that all of the aforementioned Treaties, Conventions and International accords as under paragraphs X(X) through to X(X) above as those the alleged victims complained about, specifically provide that the provisions referred to above and herein supersede and override all National Law and that Judges must and fail to do their duty, to discipline themselves and uphold the provisions of all Law and accords which successive United Kingdom Governments endorsed report to the authorities and ratified on behalf of the citizens whose rights the Judges are meant to protect against all, irrespective of position and without the crimes they were/are discrimination. victims of with the documented proof the victims brandish about to (12) District Judge Xxxxx ought to have been dismissed as of 1993 after 10 Summonses were issued by the XXXXXXX (N.G.O, persons they wish to paragraph 4 above) and especially after the police were called to arrest him because he refused to remove himself from the bench impress, while promoting (on substantive grounds, such as he was implicated in a matter over which he could not possibly preside and or act as an letters from the police (to independent and impartial person) namely in the case XXXXXXXXX following an invitation by my person for him to resign and others) and or from their remove himself from the bench. own MP's that indicate 'the criminal activities are file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (15 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

condoned by one and all', including 'the victims' who then fail to use their rights to join with others to expose, on the Internet, the rampant fraud and corruption, be anything else, especially when 'the victims' are seen to have joined the club as covered in this page? Access the explicit page /2lipstalk.htm where more than enough evidence will be published about persons who made contact with us only to behave as deceitfully and with plenty of duplicity of/in purpose as the exchanges between the 'two victim challengers aspiring to and or making a career out of the discoveries they made while in the nets of the licensed fraudsters'. 'racket' Could be the only word the citizens can use to describe the activities of the staff and officers of the Solicitors' Complaint Bureau and complain to its successor, the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (both of which were/are maintained by the Law Society and its members. Both run and managed by 'solicitors'). Could there be another more apt word ? Let us have your own opinions and submissions besides our definition that has long been accepted and endorsed by the majority of their victims: 'The pinnacle of the money laundering enterprises, run by the scavenging parasites'.

(13) District Judge Xxxxxx has been reported as a 'fascist', an agent provocateur of the Xxxxxxxxxxx and a complex and or hangup person who relies on another XX High Court Judges, reported Xxxxxxxxxxx (refer to 'The Independent' newspaper of XX/XX/XXXX) who act as such and not as true and unbiased Judicious persons while purportedly serving as such in a Judicial capacity in the United Kingdom. (14) The Defence, Counterclaim and in particular the Appeal submitted to the Court by the Defendants which has as yet to be set down by the staff of the Court (the public servants who systematically and habitually serve other purposes than their duties to the public at large) must be accepted and set down by the Court in consideration of the amount claimed under the Counterclaim without objections and or on any grounds even if the Court failed to invite the Defendants to meet and or submit additional Court Fees following the submission of the Defence and Counterclaim pleadings to the Court, even if any additional Court Fees were/are deemed payable because the Counterclaim is higher than the claim, which the Court ought to and must invite the Defendants to remit such Court Fees if deemed essential under the new rules of the Court which its clerical staff ought to have invited the Defendants to remit in the first instance. Sworn at ..................................................... in the county of ........................................ this .......... day of .........................1997 Before me .........…...................................... by...Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of ...Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx ........Xxxxxx XXX XXX Officer of the Court appointed by the Judge to take affidavits

COPIES OF THE ABOVE affidavit were transmitted by FAX to (a) Mr Norman Scarth, (b) Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins (c) Mr Maurice Kellett. Others, who were 'noted to be lovers of the system as is', were handed copies or were pointed to the presence of the above affidavit in the public domain (this web-site) at various times. The last two known to be the most vociferous of Freemason bashers & activists in spreading the gospel in respect of the powers that be. All three were & are benefiting from 'attraction' to their promotional capabilities and known to be lovers of the system as is CARE OF THE FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR FRAUD APLENTY and the corruption of morons who fall victim to the practices in the courts, also to their own short-sightedness when ignoring their obligations to the rest of society and the taxpayers in general. We point to the simple fact that anyone conceding to & accepting the invitation to keep quiet (hence the failures of one and all from within many an alleged group of challenging activists, such as the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM, the fnf, the ELC, the f4J, etc.) who nonetheless default / fail to publish in the public domain the facts of life IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM / THE COURTS). Such persons recklessly ignore the fact that they render themselves to be accessories and abettors to ACTS OF CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS. The first two, named above, were also known to be active in USING OTHER VICTIMS FOR MORE OF THE SAME : FOR THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE FOR KEEPING QUIET, for suppressing the true facts of life (in tandem with the media) in the legal system and the fraudulent use of the courts' facilities, as covered in this page and acknowledged by two politicians from a legal background. [*Link from here to evidence,
above, relevant to suppression of criminal activities]

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (16 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

*sham* (link) sham? Could any report and or purported attendance to the issues referred to the Law Society that then refers the citizens to the OSS the officers of which then assert 'having looked into (!) the matters raised' without any reference to the evidence submitted to the blind and deaf, at all material times, be anything but a sham ? Access the material at: /shame.htm where material will be published covering exchanges with the blind and deaf third rate actors the law society and its members rely upon to build their world.

THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB

fraud= impostor (noun), deceit, swindle, racket, sham, deception, duplicity, pretender, misrepresentation....

[*Link from here to a page where we point to the

issue of 'recoverable proceeds of fraud' as determined by judiciary over the years when the judges served the law and the citizens an no other interests]

OVER the years we have been contacted by a number of shysters and fraudsters who fell / fall within the above category. As of 1997/8, in particular, a number have used contact with us simply to bring about pressures on the offenders, the abusers of trust, the abusers of public office and the abusers of the courts' facilities. They promoted, to us, 'assertions of intent to publish it all, facts and evidence, on the Internet. They were simply using the 'threat to publish it all, as the avenue through which to bring about settlement of their cases under the facility / provisions we expose and point to above. *Link from here to evidence establishing the fact that such a shyster, one Johan Michael Richard Foenander, had entered into negotiations with 'the authorities' for a settlement / reward under the table as covered in this page, before Mr Peter Hayward the organiser of the LIPS crowd / mob directed him to contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The letter from a solicitor who, to all intents and purposes was acting for Mr Foenander at the time, had written to another solicitor in order to turn down an offer from the other solicitor BECAUSE HIS CLIENT'S CASE WAS NEARING COMPLETION at the European Court of Human Rights : In other words the taxpayers' contributions -to the national budget- were to be used to reward his client for playing the field, as an accomplished (sucked-in) fraudsters-club-recruit. The principles of law violated through such 'provisions' are very clear. Only persons who lack any knowledge of law cannot see through the crystal clear implications as to the tax revenue targeted, stolen & misappropriated, because of blunt abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities'. We point all abusers of our time and goodwill, to the House of Lords Precedent case we released particulars of on 3rd March 2008. [*Link from here to the deliberations by their Lordships -as long ago as 1939-1940- when they covered issues of recklessness by solicitors and unsupervised
juniors; in the instance at all manner of deficient pleadings -such as a defence suspected to be false- and erratic submissions to the court were part of 'the constructive frauds on 'the serfs' who were represented by persons, licensed by the Law Society, to operate collectively as *The Cancerous Growth Industry* that Mr Andrew Yiannides first wrote of in 1970-72.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (17 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

Consider the facts published and to be published in these pages. Simply consider the evidence published and to be published as part of the *2lipstalk* page. You can then draw your own conclusions as to the only possible scenarios the evidence supports. Undisclosed secret arrangements by self-appointed 'gurus' in legal matters and court procedure, nonetheless end up lodging applications to the Strasbourg, after failing to challenge the abductors of Justice appropriately. We publish in this page a letter that Andrew settled for two victims of abuse of office. The abusers, none other but the police. The prosecution urged by the police to proceed against the targeted victims even though the Crown Prosecution Service told the police there was insufficient evidence for convictions on the issues the police were urging for a prosecution. The police and the CPS failed to make a case against the targeted citizens who then instituted proceedings against the police for damages. The damages claimed attached to the manner with which the police brought about the prosecution and arising out of the failed prosecution itself. To proceed with their case the victims of abuse of public office were obstructed with their rights at and in law. The letter below clarifies in a nutshell HOW public servants, who are retained on our behalf to serve the law and Justice engage in the usual tactics and practices for the promotion of the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry. Read the letter and recognise how the law is breached and how rights at and in law ARE violated by the servants of law and justice. Nothing could be simpler. Such persons running around asserting and alleging that their cases were not addressed by the European Court. That we are familiar with the provision we draw your attention to through these page, we simply state:- "Care of Article 38, all is suppressed; and the victims who, allegedly were let down by the courts in the United kingdom and the European Court on Human Rights, 'appear to be happy to let things be'! The very same persons brandish about letters from Members of Parliament and the police authorities. They even BLAME THE MEDIA for being wets and or for their downright indifference to 'their personal catastrophes'. The vast majority of victims simply lodge complaints founded and resting on 'unfair hearings'. In fact much more than that single element can be claimed. The two typical examples we cover in the Appeals published in our pages support most that we publish in this page:1. In the matter of the rampant Housing Benefit FRAUD through DOWNRIGHT THEFT and MISAPPROPRIATION of the housing benefit funds did not end as the offenders had set out to do. The crimes indulged into with the blessings of the police, who systematically fail to prosecute those who create, procure and promote FORGERIES for such crimes, did not culminate as the offenders set out to do. The crimes endorsed, acquiesced and promoted by the staff and officers of the 'relevant courts' (who issue and serve court orders without hearings, and even post them late, to persons who were/are party to the organised / institutionalised crime') did pay attention to the submissions filed at court and as delivered to the Lord Chancellor. Letters and documents to the Law Enforcement Agencies will now be published as we have secured more than enough evidence as to who responsible. Some of the principles were covered in the letter already published. We refer you to the content of the letter of 18 December 1998 to the Home Secretary. Consider the speed in which action was taken by the government, the councillor that ignored us for over four months and the local press that were ignoring it all for almost four years. We are to publish now an explicit letter to the Lord Chancellor covering another case. The letter covers earlier attempts, when reliance was placed on the same persons who were/are operating from within the same county court but seen to be offering their assistance and illicit services to another Local Authority. That case is partly covered in the affidavit published in *thefacts.htm* page. 2. The divorce proceedings victim, was the person who instigated the undisclosed, to Andrew, telephone exchanges. The content, published in the *2lipstalk.htm* file evinces the frame of mind in which the caller approached the person he called. In the meantime the operators of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds industry, after exposures we published in our pages, after gearing up for the conversion of one targeted property, and following APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES we shall be publishing, the owners were permitted to exercise their rights to sell the property. Two images below of a letter delivered in May 1999 to the Head of Exchequer at Haringey Council, North London. Attached to it THE LAW applicable to the issues the Council's OFFICERS had been aware of while they all carried on IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, naturally because of their reliance on the most offensive of facilities FOR the rampant fraud from within all public services. Below the two images an introduction to the 'The Daily Telegraph' main article that covered the very issue two years later. It came about after we reported the constructive frauds, through the courts to the government, as covered in our pages. (*Link to the page where we publish copies of faxes to the government)

EXPLICITletter to Haringey Council, staff & officers of which, were noted to have been acting in contempt of the law. All simply were relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation and the police to negate in the execution of their public duties and to similarly indulge in contempt of Parliament's laws. Protection of the citizens as Parliament's law and International treaties assure all, were simply relegated to the trash cans in the Republic of Haringey, as in many a state where pseudodemocracy is promoted as the if the genuine article.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (18 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
Page1 Page2

For further information on the activities of the staff of Haringey Council (as in other councils) readers & researchers should access the following pages: 1. natinscan 2. haringey 3. hbappeal. 4. benfraud 5. scamlocal 6. theyknow 7. free4all 8. thefacts 9. abuse For further information on criminal in intent activities, routine defaults and arrogantly reckless contempt for the law by the police (as a body corporate) retained and maintained by the Republic of Haringey, readers, researchers and concerned citizens should access the following pages: 1. crimesin 2. forgeries 3. Additional material inclusive of court proceedings (attempts to abuse the courts facilities) for and in connection with fraudulent demands, harassment and intimidation, visitors, readers and researchers should access also the page: http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Council/Enfield/workand.htm THERE read the letters to the Minister & to Local Authority staff / officers who were operating out of Haringey Council, also Hackney Council and, as the affidavit published in this page (*Link) establishes, as other alleged 'servants of the public' similarly indulged out
of Enfield Council.

FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link to the article we reproduce for obvious reasons]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury,
(c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal)

also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the
LIPS crowd / mob].

1. FOUR COMPARATIVE CASES, proof of ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES & the fraudulently misrepresented *independence of the judiciary* who are free to indulge as they determine to suit pre-arranged plans for 'the serfs' who pay taxes for the salaries of licensed by the state 'criminals'. The authorities and the media, between them, have ensured in an alleged democracy, one that ALLEGEDLY rests and is founded on law and order, that for ALMOST SIX DECADES NOW the citizens, THE 'SERFS' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK. Read about secret meetings (*Link) where self appointed gurus, in the use and distribution of resources, INCLUDE 'THE SERFS' WORK AND WEALTH CREATING CAPABILITIES IN THEIR CONVERSION OF ASSETS PLANS. CONVERTING IT ALL TO THEMSELVES & THEIR PARTNERS IN CRIME AS THEY GO ALONG, care of the fourth quote (*Link) in our HomePage, is their main pre-occupation. (Case ONE) The realistic conclusion you read of in our HomePage, over TEN YEARS BEFORE THE SEQUESTRATION of the assets of the National Union of Mineworkers through the official services and instruments at the disposal of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys (do look up the word 'jockey' in a decent Dictionary of the English language). Free to indulge as they please (or as appointed / directed / retained for) judicial chair occupants (*Link to definition) act as administrators of everybody's rights to their properties, INCLUDING RIGHTS IN AND AT LAW. (Case TWO) The very same administrators ('public servants' (?)) could not use the same facilities to recover the STOLEN (criminal offence) FUNDS from the MIRROR GROUP PENSION FUND (!). (Case THREE) The very same 'public servants' (?) could not use the same facilities to trace and recover the BILLIONS IMPORTED & MISAPPROPRIATED (distributed) through the POLY PECK plc FINANCIAL FIASCO. Obviously, WHEN TARGETING ASSETS anything and everything is possible; everybody knows 'the ropes to use'; but WHEN CRIME, by the institutions is at the root of it all, NOTHING EXISTS TO BRING ABOUT SIMILAR SUCCESSES. Precisely the same rules apply WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSETS THAT ARE TARGETED FOR CONVERSION OF THE 'SERFS' / 'SHITIZENS' PERSONAL ASSETS TO THE SELF-APPOINTED 'LORDS AND MASTERS' in charge of CIUKU Enterprises [*Link from here to definition]. As controllers of it all, through abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities, they act as they please. WE URGE YOU TO READ THE WORDS STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH, as reproduced in our pages [*Link from here to the page) and consider the role of the media in the cases we point to and briefly cover in this footnote. (c) Read also of the foundations and the corner stone upon which they, the criminals in control, have been building the societies of their own making for centuries / millennia. They are only acting in accordance with the teachings they follow [*Link from here], as taught by their 'God' and through the scheme and arrangements we cover AND EXPOSE IN THIS PAGE. Many the converts to their world of evil-mongering via dishonesty, deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty. (Case FOUR) We add, the creme de la creme, to the above. It was alleged and promoted by one and all (the media in the forefront) that as the front-man and controller of operations
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (19 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

(in the Poly Peck plc. fiasco) 'conveniently escaped to the unrecognised haven of the occupied Northern part of Cyprus', there was nothing the masters of ceremonies (on the world stage) could do. BUT, when the authorities in the United Kingdom were caused (by the brother/sister/family of murder victim Michael Menson) to INVESTIGATE & ACT PROPERLY in that instance, somehow they were able and succeeded in securing the co-operation of the unrecognised (?) stage managers in the occupied Northern part of Cyprus. SPEAK OF SPLIT PERSONALITIES & ORGANISED MASTER-CRAFTSMEN IN THE ART OF DECEPTION & FRAUD on the world stage! Between them, the first and second place holders for violations of human rights in Europe, they sure made a mess of things for any thinker to note. 2. From here *Link to a page where we expose Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden's parts and REAL OBJECTIVES (note plural) when she suppressed & did nothing about the Perjury by a solicitor she was working with for far too long. All the while, she was of opinion that by abusing the time and patience of Mr Andrew Yiannides (as the typical fraud of a 'human' that she was) she could carry on proclaiming her assertions about the criminal activities in and through the courts imposed on the serfs', care of her type of subliminal indoctrination inputs to the ploys created & used by the organisers of it all. HER CONVENIENT DEFAULTS & HER MOST DIRECT OF INVOLVEMENT and CREATION (by her) of the very activities she was engaging in, simply exposed her parts as just another stooge who was sent along (by the LIPS crowd mob and fraudsters) to engage in abuse of the trust she was gracefully afforded by Mr Andrew Yiannides. IN FACT HER PARTS WERE NOTED FROM THE ONSET, specifically when she indulged in the applications SHE ALONE INSTIGATED which one and all (of her associates & their affiliates) were of opinion could have been used to discredit Mr Andrew Yiannides. AS A FRAUDSTER WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE SCAMS & THE ORGANISED THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS the dreamers wrongly presumed that hers / their aims care of and the parts and the convenient defaults she engaged in, could not be recognised as blunt contributions (by her) for and towards the constructive frauds, leading to rewards for the participants through the abused courts facilities. All too obvious as of the activities, the defaults and HER FAILURES TO RAISE ANY ISSUE after the solicitor submitted the PERJURED AFFIDAVIT to court; the objective of one and all simply to generate ADDITIONAL COSTS ORDERS AGAINST THE ALLEGED VICTIM, as p[art of the money laundering facilities for the stolen taxpayers contributions through the usual fraudulent court proceedings = theatrics]. 3. *Link from here to a page where we publish a letter sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides by such a person. The link takes one directly to the letter and the challenges made of the dreamer who had been abusing the goodwill and patience for far too long; having stretched Andrew's tolerance to its limits over a span of well over 7 years. Abusing the time, testing the patience & tolerance limits of the one whose stance and presence never failed the self-proclaimed 'hero' was in the order of the day, as the wily Norman Scarth indulged for years. The 'hero' who (a) decided to join the club of fraudsters, (b) never to disclose his deceitful plans with others & his intentions to the person he looked to and relied upon for suport for years and (c) had been working in tandem with others ONLY TOWARDS THE PLUNDERING OF THE TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET was in the order of the day as the craft-y product of the abused courts facilities carried on, had been and weas engaging with others in the creation and execution of the scenarios we cover, point to and expos in this page. Readers, researchers and victims of the rampant fraud, through the courts imposed on the taxpeyers, are urged to read all of the letter we point to; all should note the challenges & the submissions to the fraud of a human (thinker) and all should access other material and evidence pointed to in the page or other pages. It is befals upon the WELL INFORMED to draw relevant conclusions and to consider the issue we point to in another page in consideration of an element and promotions the Freemasons also promote in connection with their 'contributions' through history to the development of modern pseudodemocracies and other states of government for the management & control of 'the serfs', the sons of men on planet earth. [*Link also from here to a page where we publish a transcript when the theatrical production for the day was but a run of the usual constructive frauds on the taxpayers. NOTE HOW & WHY A DISTRICT JUDGE WAS CHALLENGED TO STAND DOWN. Note also the give-away signs that exposed the true colours of the stars of the scenario / production in that instance. NOTE also the blunt discrimination by the DJ who DID NOT RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO A POLITE REQUEST but simply wished to carry on WITH THE INTENDED END PRODUCT FOR THE DAY. Carrying on as pre-arranged / organised by the criminals in control with the objectives for the day, was the only issue at hand as far as that District Judge was concerned; Justice had been dispensed with by the abusers of judicial chair occupants at the Employment Tribunals]. 4. Thinkers : 'humans who use grey matter' should consider "Why fail to refer to the Proceeds of Crime Act and implement Parliament's intentions, in the first instance, especially since the rogue businessman, had been found guilty of the crime of FRAUD? Why did Lord Woolf fail to refer to such provisions by Parliament and worse WHY DID THE REPORTER / EDITOR of the 'news-print / waffle' BESIDES IGNORING PARLIAMENT'S PROVISIONS, which we elect not to overlook? Also, what of the words of Victims of the abused court facilities -by licensed criminals- MUST ACCESS and consider the 'duty of any judge, in any civilised state -Democratic or not society- as qualified & clarified in the page all visitors, readers and researchers should link to from here, IF THEY CARE about the direction & paths, allegedly civilised states have been placed on by the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth. 5. Link from here to the most obvious of arrangements in place by the organisers xxx 6. xxx 7. xxx 8. xxx 9. xxx 10. xxx

Pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/2lipstalk.htm .org/blunket1.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/actors.htm .org/convicti.htm .org.actors2.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/contract.htm .org/beware.htm .org/courts.htm

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (20 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

.org/corruptcourts.htm
q

.org/evilones.htm

.org/govolso.htm

.org/len.htm

.org/media.htm

.org/solfraud.htm

q

q

q

q q

q

ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED. Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all. Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm. The author's statements, such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover of it all. Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).

ACCESS: http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site)
& http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org (A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' and 'no undue influence' by solicitor.)

To HomePage

To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites

List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed

Knowledge Class even audaciously proposes to solve the very social pathologies they themselves often contributed to creating. They continue to demand that we give them more money, more time, and even allow them to raise our taxes again and again to underwrite yet more utopian experiments in social engineering and statesponsored "virtue," in spite of the fact that the least productive people in our society are often those with whom our social engineers and their government programs, have had the most to do........."
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same. Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do. For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact: webmaster

*Link from here to extracts from 'Dancing Alone', the work of Frank Schaeffer: - "The

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (21 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]