of 2

Criminal Law Checklist

Published on 2 weeks ago | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 0 | Comments: 0
265 views

Comments

Content

MPC Requirements: Requirements: Attempt requires (p.1219) - same mens rea as actual crime purposely do something that is considered a “substantial step” towards completing crime & corroborates to criminal act (jury will weigh in on this) Defense: Abandonment (has to be voluntary; not because crime is too difficult so  gives up)

Murder requires  (p.1232): - must kill person with purpose, knowledge(practically certain) or extreme indifference of human life (permissive presumption ---presumed if  is in flight fli ght from enumerated crime of: rape; robbery; deviate sexual intercourse)  look at each mental state one by one Defenses: necessity (chose between lesser of 2 evils—can’t evils—can’t use if person was reckless from start); mitigation to manslaughter b/c of EED; self defense Manslaughter requires: - need to kill recklessly or under EED

Felony Murder( no actual statute): MPC takes restricted approach —specific enumerated felonies apply (rape; robbery; deviate sexual intercourse)— intercourse)—rebuttable presumption of extreme indifference(recklessnesss default rule) indifference(recklessnes o attempted murder- not included in enumerated felonies so no FM o an assault with a deadly weapon that leads to death will usually not be considered felony murder MPC doesn’t allow merger limitation b/c it only allows felony murder liablility in restricted times- the enumerated felonies Rape requires: male has actual sex with female (if no actual sex then it will be attempted rape) not the man’s wife force or threat of force o no mens rea so default is recklessness o if male has sex with another male— male—not rape Attempted rape requires (attempt pg.1219): same mens rea as rape but look at elements of attempt! Defense: impossibility (legal impossibility)— impossibility)—if married then it cannot legally be rape - mistake of fact defense of rape???

Accomplice liability: can have attempt accessory after the fact in MPC -

MPC only attaches liability to accomplice if crime is actually foreseen (actually contemplated by the perpetrator)— perpetrator)—not enough for it to be simple foreseeable

CAN YOU ANSWER THIS?

P (principle) commits a crime and A (accomplice) helps him in some way. If P completes the crime, but P has a defense (let’s say insanity), can A still be liable for the crime as an accomplice? --- This is what it said online but it doesn't really answer anything

It depends on the jurisdiction’s view of the source of accomplice liability. Common Law: accomplice liability derives from the principal’s liability (extended to those who assist); Modern Law: accomplice liability is personal to the accomplice (doesn’t depend on the principal’s liability

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close