of 8

Criminal Law Revision Notes

Published on 2 weeks ago | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 0 | Comments: 0
188 views

Comments

Content

Criminal Law Revision Notes Elements of Criminal Law Reading J. Herring Criminal Law (Palgrave Law (Palgrave 8th edition) pp. 1-23. A. Ashworth, “s the !ri"inal #aw a #ost !a$se%& (2''') 11 LQR 22 LQR 22  *opi+s  *opi+s

 *he st$d o the +ri"inal law is the st$d o liailit. liailit.



t is not ao$t whether a person +an e +harged with a +ri"e, or what senten+e he "a a+e i +onvi+ted, $t rather it deals with whether a person is inno+ent or g$ilt o an o/en+e (i.e. whether or not he +an e +onvi+ted).



 *hin0 ao$t the +ri"inal law in ter"s o what has to e proved in order to +onvi+t a person o a +ri"e, not ao$t how it +an e proved.



 o$r  o$r depth o $nderstanding o the +ri"inal law will also e enhan+ed i o$ are ale to identi how the law is reor"ed,  Parlia"ent, the +o$rts, and as a res$lt o an $ropean in$en+e.



Introduction to Criminal Law Purpose of Criminal Law – •

Prote+t individ$als and propert ro" 4har"5



Preserve order in so+iet



P$nish those who deserve p$nish"ent ( deterren+e 6 7$sties senten+ing whi+h are harsher that wo$ld e deserved si"pl on the gravit o the o/en+e in order to prote+t so+iet and red$+e +ri"e  deterring other ro" engaging in the sa"e a+tivities.) ( n+apa+itation 6 to re"ove people ro" so+iet where the pose a ris0 o re o/ending or danger) dange r) (Rehailitation to ret$rn people a+0 to so+iet in a reor"ed state o "ind 6 "odern da repla+ed with prison ed$+ation and training s+he"es and

treat"ent progra""es) ( Retri$tion Retri$tion 6 gravit o the +ri"e is proportional to the har" +a$sed)

Moral values? !an e arg$ed that is it not or +ri"inal to interere in the private lives o +iti9ens $nless it is ne+essar ne+ essar to tr to i"pose +ertain standards o ehavio$r. ehavio$r. *he :olenden +o""ittee (1;<) elt that intervention i ntervention in private lives sho$ld onl e 6

- to preserve p$li+ de+en+, - to prote+t the +iti9en ro" what is o/ensive or in7$rio$s -  *o  *o provide s$=+ient saeg$ards against e>ploitation e>ploitation and +orr$ption o others, parti+$larl those who are v$lnerale. #ord ?evlin in the nor+e"ent o "orals (1;) disagreed. He elt el t that there are a+ts 4so gross and o$trageo$s that the "$st e prevents at an +ost5. !ases +oni+ting the law in this area 6 :hen it +o"es to +ases dealing with this iss$e the +o$rts are not alwas +onsistent when approa+hing this thi s area o the law. law. n @rown 1;;3 *he 1;;3 *he H $pheld +onvi+tions or assa$lt +a$sing a+t$al odil har" and "ali+io$s wo$nding or a+ts done in private  a gro$p o +onsenting ad$lt sado"aso+hists. :ilson 1;; *he 1;; *he !A B$ashed a +onvi+tion o assa$lt +a$sing a+t$al odil har" where a h$sand randed his initials into i nto his wie $tto+0s at her reB$est.

Denition of a crime  A crime is conduct forbidden by the state and which punishment has been attached because the conduct is regarded by the state as being criminal

 *his denition +overs all +ri"es in the CD. *he #aw in the CD however is li0el to +hange where there is a +hange when there is a +hange in val$es o the gov and so+iet. so+iet. .g. -

-  *he +ri"inal law a"end"ent A+t 1;8 +ri"inalised +onsens$al ho"ose>$al a+ts etween ad$lts in private. -  *he se>$al o/en+es A+t 1;< de+ri"inalised s$+h ehavio$r etween those aged 21 and over -  *he +ri"inal 7$sti+e and p$li+ order a+t 1;;E de+ri"inalised s$+h ehavio$r or those aged 18 and over. over. - n 2''' gov $sed parlia"ent a+ts to red$+e the age o +onsent to 1 or ho"ose>$al.  Judicial Law main! Fo"e +ond$+t is +ri"inalised not  the state $t  7$dges e.g Fhaw v ?PP 1;2 6 where an o/en+e o +onspira+ to +orr$pt p$li+ "orals was +reated. *he +reation o the o/en+e was +onr"ed in Dn$ller (P$lishing, Printing and Pro"otions) Pro"otions) #td v ?PP 1;<3. Another e>a"ple is the o/en+e o o$traging p$li+ inde+en+ Gison 1;;1. Also "arital rape in R v R 1;;1

Classication of o"ences !lassi+ation where a +ase will e tried-

- ndi+tale onl o/en+es, whi+h "$st e tried on indi+t"ent at the +rown +o$rt(I$rder, rape Iansla$ghter) -  *riale  *riale either wa o/en+es whi+h +an e tried either on indi+t"ent at the !rown +o$rt or at "agistrates +o$rt ( *het, $rglar  assa$lt o++asioning o++asioning a+t$al odil har") har") - F$""ar o/en+es whi+h +an onl e tried at the "agistrates +o$rt e.eg assa$lting a poli+e o=+er in the e>e+$tion o his d$t Cate!ories for police detention

Poli+e powers are +odied  the Poli+e and !ri"inal eviden+e A+t 1;8E. Poli+e powers to detain a s$spe+t who had een arrested depends on +ategor o o/en+es-

- F$""ar o/en+es - Poli+e +an onl detain an arrested person or "a>. 2Ehrs - ndi+tale o/en+es 6 *he s$spe+t +an onl e detain or 2E ho$rs, $t this +an e e>tended to 3hrs  an s$perintendent o=+er or aove. @$t poli+e +an appl to "agistrates to detain the s$spe+t or "a>. ; ho$rs i needed. -  *erroris"  *erroris" o/en+es 6 *he *he s$spe+t +an e detained or E8 hrs and this +an e e>tended to "a> 1E das i an appli+ation is "ade to the 7$dge. Classif#in! law $# its source #aw +o"es ro" vario$s so$r+es. *hese so$r+es are-

!o" !o""on "on #aw #aw (J$d (J$dge ge-" -"ad ade) e)

-

Ftat Ftat$t $tor or  (de (dened ned  an an a+t a+t o parl parlia ia"e "ent) nt)

-

Reg$la eg$lato tor r (Fet (Fet o$t o$t in deleg delegat ated ed legi legisl slat atio ion) n)

%#pe of &arm caused $# t&e crime  *here are vario$s +ategories as to the har" that is +a$sed when an o/en+e is +o""itted. *he "ain +ategories +atego ries are-

K/en /en+es +es aga again ins st a pers person on

-

K/en /en+es +es agai agains nstt pro propert pert 

-

K/en K/en+e +es s aga again inst st p$l p$li+ i+ orde orderr

Elements of a crime Lor all +ri"es, e>+ept +ri"es o stri+t liailit, there are two ele"ents that "$st e proved  the prose+$tion.

 *hese are -

A+t$s Re$s Iens Rea

 *hese ter"s ter"s +o"e ro" ro" a #atin "a>i" a+t$s non a+it re$" re$" nisi "ens sit rea whi+h "eans the a+t itsel does not +onstit$te g$ilt $nless done with a g$ilt "ind.  A+t$s re$s has a wider "eaning than an a+t as it +an +over o"issions or a state o a/airs. *he ter" a+t$s re$s has has een +riti+ised as "isleading. "isleading. #ord ?iplo+0 in Iiller (1;83) preerred preerred the ter" 4prohiited +ond$+t5. *he #aw !o""ission in the ?rat !ri"inal !ode (1;8;) $sed the ter" 4e>ternal ele"ent5 Iens rea translates as 4g$ilt "ind5 $t this is also "isleading. *he levels o 4g$ilt "ind5 var. *he #aw !o""ission in the ?rat !ri"inal !ode (1;8;) $sed the ter" 4a$lt ele"ent5.  *he a+t$s re$s re$s and "ens rea rea will e di/erent or di/erent +ri"es. +ri"es.  *he a+t$s re$s re$s and the "ens rea rea "$st e present present together, $t i there there is an ongoing a+t, then the e>isten+e o the ne+essar "ens rea at an point d$ring that a+t is s$=+ient ( Lagan v Ietropolitan Poli+e !o""issioner (1;;) ). *his also applies where there is a seB$en+e o events or a+ts (*hao Ieli (1;E) , #e @r$n (1;;1)). ven where the a+t$s re$s and "ens rea are present, the deendant "a e not g$ilt i he has a deen+e.

'urden of Proof   *he $rden is on on the prose+$tion prose+$tion to prove the +ase. +ase. *his "eans that that the "$st prove oth the reB$ired a+t$s re$s and the reB$ired "ens rea (:ool"ington v ?PP (1;3)). An a++$sed person is pres$"ed inno+ent $ntil proven g$ilt.  *he standard standard o proo is 4eond 4eond reasonale reasonale do$t5.  the deendant raises a deen+e then it is or the prose+$tion prose+$tion to negate that deen+e. n :ool"ington the deendant stated that the g$n had gone o/ a++identall, th$s raising the deen+e o a++ident. *he prose+$tion were oliged to disprove this i the deendant was to e o$nd g$ilt. Lor +ertain deen+es the $rden o proo is on the deendant. Lor e>a"ple, or the deen+e o insanit the deendant has to prove he was insane at the ti"e o the o/en+e. Pla+ing the $rden o proo on the deen+e "a rea+h Art (2) o the $ropean !onvention on H$"an Rights

Criminal law and &uman ri!&ts  *he H$"an Rights Rights A+t 1;;8 in+orporated in+orporated the $ropean $ropean !onvention on H$"an Rights into o$r law. All Arti+les have to e +onsidered in nglish law.  n +ri"inal law the "ost relevant rights $nder the +onvention are -

*he *he rig right ht to a ai airr tri trial al (A (Art rt (1) (1))) *he *he pres pres$" $"pt ptio ion n o inn inno+ o+en en+e +e (Ar (Artt (2) (2))) Mo p$n p$nis ish" h"en entt with witho$ o$tt law law (Art (Art <(1 <(1)) ))..

Kther !onvention rights relevant to +ri"inal law in+l$de -

*he righ rightt not to to e s$7e s$7e+te +ted d to inh$"a inh$"an n or degr degradin ading g treat treat"e "ent nt

-

(Art 3(1)) *he right right o o resp respe+t e+t or or a pers person5 on5s s priva private te lie lie (Ar (Artt 8) *hat, *hat, in the appli+ation appli+ation o the the !onvent !onvention ion rights rights and reedo" reedo"s, s, ther there e sho$ld e no dis+ri"ination on the gro$nds o se>, ra+e, +olo$r, religion or politi+al opinion (Art 1E).

%&e ri!&t to a fair trial  *his right is +ontained in Arti+le Arti+le (1). n G (2'') it was held that that the a+t that the o/en+e was one o stri+t liailit did not render the trial $nair. $nair. 'urden of proof Arti+le (2) states that 4verone +harged with a +ri"inal o/en+e shall e pres$"ed pres$"ed inno+ent $ntil proven g$ilt5. *his pla+es the $rden o proo on the prose+$tion. ?een+es whi+h pla+e the $rden o proving the deen+e in the deendant "a e in rea+h o this Arti+le.  However, the +o$rts have held that in so"e stat$tes the reverse $rden $rden o proo "a e interpreted as evidential onl (A-G Reeren+e (Mo E o 2''2) (2''E)). n addition, the Ho$se o #ords has held that a $ll reverse $rden $rden o proo "a e a++eptale i it is not $nair or disproportionate. (Fheldra0e (Fheldra0e v ?PP (2'')).

Mo p$nish"ent witho$t law  1. Arti+le <(1) states that 4Mo one shall e held g$ilt o an +ri"inal o/en+e on a++o$nt o an a+t or o"ission whi+h did not +onstit$te a +ri"inal o/en+e $nder national law or international law at the ti"e it was +o""itted5.

 2.  the o/en+e is one whi+h +onor"s to the $nda"ental o7e+tives o the !onvention, then it will not e in rea+h o this Arti+le !R ! R v CD (1;;) where the +onvi+tion o a h$sand or the rape o his wie was approved  the $ropean !o$rt o H$"an Rights.  3. n other +ases there have een +hallenges $nder Art < on the asis that the o/en+e is too $n+ertain or la+0s +larit, e.g gross negligen+e "ansla$ghter (R v Iisra R v Frivastava (2''E)) (see ;.E.2) and p$li+ n$isan+e (Goldstein (2'')).  *o  *o date no +hallenge on the asis o la+0 o +larit has een s$++ess$l. s$++ess$l. 1..E Kther h$"an rights  1. *here have een +hallenges to the +ri"inal law on the asis o other rights in the !onvention. 2. n Altha" (2'') the deendant +lai"ed that the re$sal to allow hi" the deen+e o ne+essit in respe+t o his $se o +annais or e>tre"e phsi+al pain was a rea+h o Art 3 whi+h provides that no one shall e s$7e+ted to 4inh$"an or degrading treat"ent5. *his +hallenge ailed. 3. Fi"ilarl, in N$ale (2'') the deendant arg$ed that the re$sal to allow hi" the deen+e o ne+essit in respe+t o his $se o +annais or e>tre"e phsi+al pain was a rea+h o Art 8. *his Arti+le gives a right to respe+t or a person5s private lie. *his +hallenge also ailed.  E. n G (2''8) a "inorit o the #aw #ords held that prose+$ting ?, aged 1, $nder s o the Fe>$al K/en+es A+t 2''3 (rape o a +hild) was disproportionate and a rea+h o Art 8 when the se>$al inter+o$rse was +onsens$al and ? +o$ld have een +harged $nder s13 o the A+t.  . n ?ehal (2'') it i t was held that ?5s right to reedo" o e>pression (Art 1') had een inringed when he was prose+$ted $nder sE o the P$li+ Krder A+t 1;8 or pla+ing a noti+e in a te"ple stating that the prea+her was a hpo+rite.

A+t$s Re$s  J. Herring Criminal Law (Palgrave (Palgrave 2'13) pp. 3;-8E. R v Woollin O1;;; A! 82 3 :#R 382 O1;;8 E All R 1'3 H# R v G (and Another) O2''; 1 A! ;2 O2''8 !ri" #R 818 O2''8 CDH# 3< A. Ashworth “*he F+ope o !ri"inal #iailit or K"issions& (1;8;) 1' #NR E2E  J. Herring Criminal Law !e"t# Cases and $aterials (K>ord, 2'1E) pp. ;1E, 12-1;.

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close