Criminal Law Structural Outline

Published on December 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 29 | Comments: 0 | Views: 181
of 11
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

CRIMINAL LAW
SIXTH EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS


CHAPTER 1 THE PROVINCE AND LIMITS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW
o

o

o

1.01 THE DECISION TO CRIMINALIZE  Commonwealth v. Jones (880 S.W.2d 544)  Comments and Questions  D.P. v. State (705 So. 2)  Comments and Questions  Problem  State v. Mortimer (142 N.C. App. 321)  Comments and Questions  David A.J. Richards, The Concept of the Public Morality and the Criminal Law  Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558)  Comments and Questions 1.02 THE DECISION TO PUNISH  Regina v. Jones (115 Can. Crim. Cases 273)  Comments and Questions  Regina v. Dudley & Stephens (14 Q.B. 273)  Comments and Questions  Kant, The Metaphysical Elements of Justice pp. 100–01  United States v. Bergman (416 F. Supp. 496)  Comments  United States v. Jackson (835 F.2d 1195)  Comments and Questions  Posner, Optimal Sentence for White-Collar Criminals  Richards, Human Rights and the Moral Foundation of the Substantive Criminal Law  Bibliographical Note  Jones v. City of Los Angeles (444 F.3d 1118)  Comment 1.03 MAKING CONDUCT CRIMINAL  [A] The Sources of the Criminal Law  [1] Common Law  Perkins, The Common Law  State v. Palendrano (120 N.J. Super. 336)  Comments  Weishaupt v. Commonwealth (227 Va. 389)  Comment  [2] Statutes  United States v. Reid (206 F. Supp. 2)



Comments and Questions Problems  Morissette v. United States (342 U.S. 246)  Comments and Questions  Johnson v. State (602 So. 2)  Comments and Questions  Problem  People v. Turner (249 Ill. App. 3)  Comments and Questions [B] Constitutional Limitations  [1] Free Expression  People v. Barton (8 N.Y.3d 70)  Potts v. United States (919 A.2d 1127)  Comment and Questions  [2] Equal Protection  Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558)  [3] Due Process  Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352)  Comment  State v. Miranda (260 Conn. 93)
 



CHAPTER 2 THE ACT REQUIREMENT
o o

o

o

2.01 INTRODUCTION  Actus Reus: of Acts and Omissions 2.02 THE VOLUNTARY ACT  Kilbride v. Lake  Comments and Questions  State v. Hinkle (200 W. Va. 280)  Comments and Questions 2.03 ACT OF OMISSION  Commonwealth v. Pestinikas (421 Pa. Super. 371)  Comment  People v. Campbell (124 Mich. App. 333)  Questions 2.04 POSSESSION  People v. Valot (33 Mich. App. 49)  Comments and Questions  Commonwealth v. Buckley (354 Mass. 508)  Problems 3.01 INTRODUCTION  Bridgman, Determinism and Punishment  Model Penal Code  Commentary  [A] Purposefulness  State v. Smith (262 N.J. Super. 487)  Comment



CHAPTER 3 THE MENTAL STATE
o

o

o

o

People v. Hood (1 Cal. 3) United States v. Tobin (480 F.3d 53)  Problem  [B] Knowledge  Fabritz v. Traurig (583 F.2d 697)  Questions  United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp. (402 U.S. 558)  State v. Suddith (379 Md. 425)  United States v. Bailey (444 U.S. 394)  Comment  [C] Recklessness  Commonwealth v. Welansky (316 Mass. 383)  Comment  State v. Cushman (133 Vt. 121)  Commonwealth v. Huggins (575 Pa. 395)  Comment  Jones v. Commonwealth (636 S.E.2d 403)  [D] Negligence  People v. Howk (56 Cal. 2)  State v. Goff (297 Or. 635) 3.02 MISTAKE  Model Penal Code  Commentary  [A] Of Fact  United States v. Short (4 C.M.A. 437)  Problem  [B] Of Law  United States v. Mancuso (420 F.2d 556)  United States v. Clegg (846 F.2d 1221)  Commonwealth v. Twitchell (416 Mass. 114)  Ratzlaf v. United States (510 U.S. 135) 3.03 STRICT LIABILITY  Staples v. United States (511 U.S. 600)  State v. Miller (309 Or. 362)  Comments 3.04 VICARIOUS LIABILITY  Comment  Davis v. Peachtree City (251 Ga. 219)  State v. Zeta Chi Fraternity (142 N.H. 16)  Comments
 



CHAPTER 4 PARTIES TO CRIMES
o

o

4.01 THE OLD  Standefer v. United States (447 U.S. 10)  Questions and Comments 4.02 THE NEW











[A] The State of Mind  [1] The Proof Problem  State v. Gladstone (78 Wash. 2)  Questions and Comments  [2] Facilitation  Commonwealth v. Feinberg (433 Pa. 558)  Questions and Comments [B] What is Enough Aid?  [1] The Proof Problem  United States v. Garguilo (310 F.2d 249)  Questions and Comments  [2] Words Alone  United States v. Kelley (769 F.2d 215)  Questions and Comments [C] The Scope of Responsibility  People v. Poplar (20 Mich. App. 132)  Questions and Comments [D] No Criminal Responsibility  [1] Withdrawal  State v. Thomas (140 N.J. Super. 429)  Questions and Comments  [2] Exceptions  Regina v. Tyrell (17 Cox Crim. Cas. 716)  Questions and Comments [E] After the Fact Assistance  People v. Duty (269 Cal. App. 2)  Questions and Comments



CHAPTER 5 PRINCIPAL OFFENSES
o

5.01 THEFT OFFENSES  [A] Larceny  [1] Trespass  Topolewski v. State (130 Wis. 244)  Fletcher, The Metamorphosis of Larceny  Comment  Hufstetler v. State (37 Ala. App. 71)  Comments and Questions  [2] Taking  Thompson v. State (94 Ala. 535)  Comment  People v. Olivo (52 N.Y.2d 309)  People v. Rivera (141 Ill. 2)  Question  [3] Asportation  Caruso v. State (205 Tenn. 211)  Comments and Questions  People v. Lopez (31 Cal. 4)

o

o

Comments  [4] Personal Property  People v. Ashworth (220 A.D. 498)  Comments and Questions  Lund v. Commonwealth (217 Va. 688)  Comments and Questions  Regina v. Stewart (50 DLR. 4)  Comments and Questions  United States v. Farraj (142 F. Supp. 2)  Questions  [5] Of Another  State v. Cohen (196 Minn. 39)  Comments and Questions  The Disputed Claim  [6] Intent to Deprive Permanently  State v. Boisvert (236 A.2d 419)  Comment  Chadwell v. State (37 Ark. App. 9)  State v. Mcgraw (480 N.E.2d 552)  Comment and Question  People v. Tufunga (21 Cal. 4)  Comment  [B] False Pretenses  Brown v. Commonwealth (656 S.W.2d 727)  Question  Problems  State v. Clermont (9 Or. App. 141)  Comments and Questions  People v. Whight (36 Cal. App. 4)  [C] Federal Fraud  United States v. Siegel (717 F.2d 9)  Comments and Questions  Carpenter v. United States (484 U.S. 19)  Comments and Questions  Problem  [D] Embezzlement  Briggs v. State (3 Tenn. Crim. App. 471)  Comments  Batin v. State (118 Nev. 61)  Questions  Problem  State v. Lough (899 A.2d 468) 5.02 ROBBERY  State v. Sein (124 N.J. 209)  Comments 5.03 EXTORTION


o o

o

Rendelman v. State (175 Md. App. 422)  Comments and Questions  State v. Greenspan (92 N.C. App. 563) 5.04 BURGLARY 5.05 SEX OFFENSES  [A] Rape  [1] Context  State in Interest of M.T.S. (129 N.J. 422)  Comments  [2] By Force  People v. Iniguez (7 Cal. 4)  Comments  Commonwealth v. Berkowitz (537 Pa. 143)  In the Interest of M.T.S. (29 N.J. 422)  Comments and Questions  People v. Thompson (72 N.Y.2d 410)  Comments and Questions  [3] By Coercion and Fraud  Commonwealth v. Caracciola (409 Mass. 648)  Comments and Questions  State v. Bolsinger (709 N.W.2d 560)  Comments and Questions  Problem  [4] Consent and Mistake  Commonwealth v. Lopez (433 Mass. 722)  Commonwealth v. Fischer (721 A.2d 1111)  Comments and Questions  [5] Post Penetration Rape  State v. Robinson (496 A.2d 1067)  State v. Bunyard (281 Kan. 392)  Comments  [B] Statutory Rape  Ledbetter v. State (184 Tenn. 396)  Comments  People v. Hernandez (61 Cal. 2)  Comments  Garrison v. Elo (156 F. Supp. 2)  [C] Prostitution  Commonwealth v. Dodge (287 Pa. Super. 148)  Comments and Questions  State v. Kittilstad (231 Wis. 2)  Problem 5.06 HOMICIDE  [A] The Killing of a Human Being  State v. Fierro (124 Ariz. 182)  Questions and Comments






Washington v. Glucksberg (521 U.S. 702) Vacco v. Quill (521 U.S. 793)  Questions and Comments  Keeler v. Superior Court (2 Cal. 3)  Questions and Comments [B] Murder  [1] Malice Aforethought  [a] Intent to Kill  State v. Myers (7 N.J. 465)  Notes and Questions  [b] Intent to Inflict Great Bodily Harm  State v. Thompson (578 So. 2)  Questions and Comments  People v. Geiger (10 Mich. App. 339)  Questions and Comments  [c] Abandoned and Malignant (or Depraved) Heart  People v. Knoller (41 Cal. 4)  Questions and Comments  State v. Hemphill (104 N.C. App. 431)  Questions and Comments  [2] Felony Murder  [a] Which Felonies  People v. Howard (34 Cal. 4)  Questions and Comments  Roary v. State (385 Md. 217)  Questions and Comments  [b] During the Commission of a Felony  People v. Johnson (5 Cal. App. 4)  Questions and Comments  State v. Maudlin (215 Kan. 956)  Questions and Comments  [c] The Extent of Responsibility  Jackson v. State (286 Md. 430)  Questions and Comments  [d] The Dissenting View  People v. Aaron (409 Mich. 672)  Questions and Comments  [3] The Degrees of Murder  Austin v. United States (127 U.S. App. D.C. 180)  Questions and Comments  [4] The Corpus Delicti  People v. Scott (176 Cal. App. 2)  Questions and Comments [C] Manslaughter  [1] Voluntary Manslaughter  People v. Bridgehouse (47 Cal. 2)
 



Questions and Comments  People v. Najera (138 Cal. App. 4)  Questions and Comments  State v. Faulkner (301 Md. 482)  Questions and Comments  [2] Involuntary Manslaughter  Commonwealth v. Welansky (316 Mass. 383)  Questions and Comments  Commonwealth v. Konz (498 Pa. 639)  Questions and Comments  People v. Nelson (309 N.Y. 231)  Questions and Comments [D] Causation  Commonwealth v. Root (403 Pa. 571)  Questions and Comments  Brackett v. Peters (11 F.3d 78)  Questions and Comments




CHAPTER 6 THE INCHOATE OFFENSES
o

o

6.01 SOLICITATION  Dickerson v. City of Richmond (2 Va. App. 473)  Questions and Comments  People v. Gordon (47 Cal. App. 3)  Questions and Comments  People v. Latsis (195 Colo. 411)  Questions and Comments  People v. Rubin (96 Cal. App. 3)  Questions and Comments 6.02 ATTEMPT  [A] The Mental State  State v. Casey (2003 UT 55, 82)  Comments and Questions  [B] The Act Requirement  Walters v. Maass (45 F.3d 1355)  Questions and Comments  People v. Mahboubian (74 N.Y.2d 174)  Questions and Comments  People v. Brown (75 Ill. App. 3)  Questions and Comments  [C] The Completed Offense  Lightfoot v. State (278 Md. 231)  Questions and Comments  [D] Abandonment  People v. Staples (6 Cal. App. 3)  Questions and Comments  [E] Impossibility  Commonwealth v. Henley (504 Pa. 408)

o

Questions and Comments  People v. Dlugash (51 A.D.2d 974)  People v. Dlugash (41 N.Y.2d 725)  Comments and Questions  United States v. Oviedo (525 F.2d 881)  Questions and Comments 6.03 CONSPIRACY  [A] The Mental State  People v. McChristian (18 Ill. App. 3)  Questions and Comments  United States v. Feola (420 U.S. 671)  Questions and Comments  United States v. Bruno (105 F.2d 921)  Questions and Comments  Note, Federal Treatment of Multiple Conspiracies  [B] The Agreement  Direct Sales Co. v. United States (319 U.S. 703)  Questions and Comments  State v. St. Christopher (305 Minn. 226)  Questions and Comments  [C] Object of the Agreement  Commonwealth v. Donoghue (250 Ky. 343)  Questions and Comments  [D] The Completed Offense  Albernaz v. United States (450 U.S. 333)  Questions and Comments  Pinkerton v. United States (328 U.S. 640)  Questions and Comments




CHAPTER 7 DEFENSES
o

7.01 PRIVILEGES TO DEFEND  [A] Self-Defense  People v. Goetz (68 N.Y.2d 96)  Questions and Comments  Bechtel v. State (1992 OK CR 55)  Questions and Comments  Comment  State v. Rupp (282 N.W.2d 125)  Questions and Comments  Commonwealth v. Shaffer (367 Mass. 508)  Questions and Comments  State v. Pride (567 S.W.2d 426)  Questions and Comments  People v. Cherry (307 N.Y. 308)  Questions and Comments  [B] Defense of Others  State v. Fair (45 N.J. 77)

o

o

o

o

Questions and Comments  [C] Defense of Property  People v. Ceballos (12 Cal. 3)  Questions and Comments  [D] Defense of Habitation  C. Carpenter, Of the Enemy Within, The Castle Doctrine, and SelfDefense  Questions and Comments  [E] Prevention of Crime  Tennessee v. Garner (471 U.S. 1)  Questions and Comments 7.02 DURESS AND NECESSITY  Problems  State v. Metcalf (60 Ohio App. 2)  Questions and Comments  United States v. Bailey (444 U.S. 394)  Questions and Comments  State v. Warshow (138 Vt. 22)  Questions and Comments 7.03 ENTRAPMENT  Sherman v. United States (356 U.S. 369)  Questions and Comments  United States v. Russell (411 U.S. 423)  Comments and Questions  Jacobson v. United States (503 U.S. 540)  Questions and Comments 7.04 INTOXICATION  Heideman v. United States (104 U.S. App. D.C. 128)  Questions and Comments  State v. Stasio (78 N.J. 467)  Questions and Comments 7.05 THE INSANITY DEFENSE  [A] The Formulations  M'Naghten's Case  Questions and Comments  Comment  State v. Johnson (121 R.I. 254)  Questions and Comments  United States v. Brawner (153 U.S. App. D.C. 1)  Questions and Comments  [B] Raising the Question  Frendak v. United States (408 A.2d 364)  Questions and Comments  [C] Diminished Capacity  State v. Joseph (214 W. Va. 525)  Questions and Comments




[D] Competency to Stand Trial  State v. Vannatta (506 N.W.2d 63)  Questions and Comments

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close