DeVry ENGL 147 All Discussion Questions - Graded

Published on January 2017 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 33 | Comments: 0 | Views: 386
of 4
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

DeVry ENGL 147 All Discussion Questions - Graded
IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below ,
Instant Download
http://www.hwspeed.com/DeVry-ENGL-147-All-Discussion-Questions-Graded4334039430.htm?categoryId=-1

If You Face

Any Problem E- Mail Us At [email protected]

WEEK 1

Exploring the Course Themes (graded)
The four course themes of education, technology, family, and health and wellness are topics that touch
each of our lives in some way. In this discussion, practice exploring the themes as a researcher would:
by creating problem statements.
How do you do this? Ask and then answer the question using a sub-topic (see below). Here’s an
example. “For whom is [school bullying] a problem?“ In your post, provide the question and then the
answer to the question. For example, “School bullying is a problem for victims of bullying
because. . . .” Complete the statement based on your experience and knowledge.

Topic Selection (graded)
To prepare for your topic selection and the research process, conduct an Internet search to find at least
two articles that have been posted in the last year on one of the "themes" topics (i.e., bullying). The
goal is to find articles that take clear positions on the topic. Share what you find and include the URL
links to the articles. After you’ve posted, assess a classmate’s links, indicating whether you’d like to
read or hear more about the topic and why.

WEEK 2

Argumentative Strategies (graded)
In research writing, what exactly do we mean by argument? Do we mean taking an extreme position
and standing our ground, whether or not the facts support our position? Or do we mean instead
convincing our audience by taking a reasonable stance on an issue and supporting our position with
appropriate evidence? Define and explain the difference using examples.

Internet Reliability (graded)
How reliable is the Internet as a source of information for your research? What are the ways you can
validate information that you find on the Internet? Why is this necessary? Use examples from the
Information Literacy module you reviewed this week.

This section lists options that can be used to view responses.

WEEK 3

Presenting Ideas (graded)
Persuasive presenters have several traits in common. Browse through TED talks
http://www.ted.com/talks or American Rhetoric Website at http://www.americanrhetoric.com/ to find
notable speakers who demonstrate strong communication traits. Compare and contrast the ways these
speakers meaningfully communicate ideas to their audiences. Include the URL link of the speaker you
choose to write about. In a short paragraph, respond to a classmate’s post, indicating whether you
agree or disagree with his or her choice, and why.

Preparing the Research Proposal (graded)
How important is it to be personally invested in an idea? Can you sell an idea that you have no stake
in? Why or why not? Using one of the resources from the Course Readings, provide an example of an
author who is communicating in a way that tells a reader that the author is credible and is a
trustworthy source.

WEEK 4

Annotated Bibliography Entries (graded)
In your textbook (pp. 325–326), you’ll find a model of an annotated bibliography. Review the model,
focusing on the components of the entry: (1) the reference citation, (2) the summary, and (3) the
assessment. Then draft one reference entry and two paragraphs from one of your sources. We’ll use
the rest of the week to peer review the entries to prepare you for this week’s assignment.

This section lists options that can be used to view responses.

Argumentative Strategies (graded)
In presenting an argument, should a writer strive to be the final authority or a reasonable voice on an
issue? Review Chapter 22 to understand the difference. Then, using your topic and one or more of your
sources, define and provide an example of an arguable claim as opposed to a personal judgment.

WEEK 5

Analyzing a Sample Argument (graded)
In the textbook, review the student essay on p. 199, “Allowing Guns on Campus Will Prevent Shootings,
Rape.” In an abbreviated format, the sample contains the elements that you will be including in your
Course Project. The controversial subject matter (the content) may engage you right away. This is a
sign that the writer is applying an argumentative strategy. Focus on the organization. What do you
notice about the way the topic is introduced? How will your draft be similar or different?

Organizational Patterns in Argument
(graded)
Let’s look at samples of research-based writing: “Nervous Nellies” on p. 328; “From Degrading to DeGrading” on p. 254; and “How Many Zombies Do You Know?” on p. 290.
Review each selection and include in your post responses to these questions. What do you notice
about how each is organized and presented? What kinds of appeals to the audience does each author
use? How are sources used in text?
Reading Strategy Note: Unlike summary and paraphrase, which require close reading, for this
discussion use the reading strategy of skimming. Carefully read the introductory paragraph, but then
move quickly, reading only the topic sentence of each paragraph. The goal is to compare and contrast
the differences in the presentation of the information in the document. Skim and review until you have
an impression you can share in the discussion.

WEEK 6

Rebuttals and Refutations (graded)
Anticipating readers’ objections is one way to determine what other sections to include and support in
your paper. Practice writing a rebuttal or a refutation by taking your thesis and considering the point of
view of someone who believes differently or even the opposite of the argument you are making. To do
this, review Chapter 10, pp. 449–452 and post a paragraph that summarizes an oppositional point of
view to your thesis and then refutes it. As peers, reply to one another explaining whether or not your
classmates are presenting the opposition objectively and whether the refutation is logical. Give one
another ideas or suggestions for points that may be left out or might need to be further developed.
The paragraph you draft here can be used in a section of your Second Draft this week.

Designing Your Course Project (graded)
While APA-style citation and format is required, you do have the flexibility in the design of your Course
Project to include a visual element. Review Chapter 17, pp. 382–387. How does the use of visual
elements enhance or detract from the presentation of research? Will you add graphs, charts, or images
to your draft? Why or why not?

WEEK 7

APA Workshop (graded)
Each academic area of study has a particular style for documenting the ideas of other scholars. The
standards of formatting document you’ve been using is from the American Psychological Association
(APA). This is the preferred style in the social sciences. As you’ve noticed, there is a strong emphasis
on the publication date. Why do you think there is such an emphasis on the date? As you work on
revising your Course Project, what questions do you have about how to incorporate standard APA
format and documentation guidelines into your essay? Are there any sources you are having a hard
time documenting? Any questions about your reference entries?

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close