EDWARD SNOWDEN: RON PAUL MOLE

Published on January 2017 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 59 | Comments: 0 | Views: 792
of 17
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

SNOWDEN INFILTRATED CIA AND NSA ON BEHALF OF RON PAUL

Having a Nazi like Ron Paul as a Presidential candidate was deleterious to America. His constant efforts to make America more vulnerable to a terrorist attack by hamstringing the NSA, CIA and FBI have finally paid off when one of his Paulbots, who, despite lack of a formal education, was able to infiltrate the NSA and steal documents which he turned over to Glenn Greenwald, a gay Jewish traitor who was the in house attorney to The Church of the Creator, a Nazi organization, headed by Matt Hale. Greenwald smuggled coded messages out of prison for Hale and as a result had to give up practicing law. In order to get the credits necessary to obtain a high school diploma, Snowden attended a community college in Maryland, studying computing, but never completed the coursework. (He later obtained his GED.) In 2003 he enlisted in the US army and began a training program to join the Special Forces. Invoking the same principles that he now cites to justify his leaks, he said: "I wanted to fight in the Iraq war because I felt like I had an obligation as a human being to help free people from oppression". He recounted how his beliefs about the war's purpose were quickly dispelled. "Most of the people training us seemed pumped up about killing Arabs, not helping anyone," he said. What Snowden is saying here is that the war in Iraq was all about Americans killing Arabs. Who would Americans killing Arabs benefit? Israel. After he broke both his legs in a training accident, he was discharged. Snowden was too much of a geek to be in Special Forces. So he had it with the bloodthirsty American military.

After that, he got his first job in an NSA facility, working as a security guard for one of the agency's covert facilities at the University of Maryland. What is obvious to me but to few others is that Edward Snowden applied for the job as an NSA security guard with the intention of starting from the bottom and working his way up the intelligence community ladder. From there, he went to the CIA, where he worked on IT security. His understanding of the internet and his talent for computer programming enabled him to rise fairly quickly for someone who lacked even a high school diploma. By 2007, the CIA stationed him with diplomatic cover in Geneva, Switzerland. His responsibility for maintaining computer network security meant he had clearance to access a wide array of classified documents. That access, along with the almost three years he spent around CIA officers, led him to begin seriously questioning the rightness of what he saw. He described as formative an incident in which he claimed CIA operatives were attempting to recruit a Swiss banker to obtain secret banking information. Snowden said they achieved this by purposely getting the banker drunk and encouraging him to drive home in his car. When the banker was arrested for drunk driving, the undercover agent seeking to befriend him offered to help, and a bond was formed that led to successful recruitment. "Much of what I saw in Geneva really disillusioned me about how my government functions and what its impact is in the world," he says. "I realized that I was part of something that was doing far more harm than good." He said it was during his CIA stint in Geneva that he thought for the first time about exposing government secrets. But, at the time, he chose not to for two reasons. First, he said: "Most of the secrets the CIA has are about people, not machines and systems, so I didn't feel comfortable with disclosures that I thought could endanger anyone". Snowden told the Guardian that he supported a third-party candidate for president in 2008. He left the CIA in 2009 in order to take his first job working for a private contractor that assigned him to a functioning NSA facility, stationed on a military base in Japan. Over the next three years, he learned just how allconsuming the NSA's surveillance activities were, claiming "they are intent on making every conversation and every form of behavior in the world known to them". He described how he once viewed the internet as "the most important invention in all of human history". As an adolescent, he spent days at a time "speaking to people with all sorts of views that I would never have encountered on my own". He explored vulnerabilities every step of the way and was able to gain access to documents that should have been beyond his ability to access without showing a need. He claims that he has the names of everyone in the U.S. intelligence community. He did not do his at the behest of a foreign government such as China; he did it on behalf of Ron Paul. Paul had manipulated him into thinking that doing so was the right thing to do for ―libertarian‖ reasons and constitutional grounds. The brainwashing worked. This kid never even graduated High School so his education came from his hero, Ron Paul. But Ron Paul‘s motivation was to weaken the United States Government and its intelligence community so that another 9/11 type terrorist attack can take place and be blamed on America‘s support of Israel or deemed a ―false flag operation‖ by the Israelis. If the devastation is far reaching enough who knows what people might think? Ron Paul is a traitor whose loyalty is to Nazism. What kind of a former Congressman would praise someone guilty of treason and espionage against his own country? Paul:

The Fourth Amendment is clear; we should be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, and all warrants must have probable cause. Today the government operates largely in secret, while seeking to know everything about our private lives – without probable cause and without a warrant. The government does not need to know more about what we are doing. We need to know more about what the government is doing. We should be thankful for individuals like Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald who see injustice being carried out by their own government and speak out, despite the risk. They have done a great service to the American people by exposing the truth about what our government is doing in secret. The constitutionalist Ron Paul cherry-picked and omitted the treason clause: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open court. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), called the NSA PRISM program, "an all-out assault on the Constitution." Isn‘t what Snowden did a violation of the constitution? If you take Paul‘s belief to its logical end in a Paul Presidency leaking documents would be legal and all of America‘s secrets exposed to its enemies. Any disgruntled employee or ex-employee could leak documents and claim to be a whistle-blower rather than a criminal. Chaos would ensue. But isn‘t this what Ron Paul wants, chaos like that in the Weimer Republic giving the Nazis a chance to blame it on the Jews and seize power? THE SNOWDEN / PAUL OVERT CONNECTION

The first donation from the traitor Snowden to the Paul campaign came from an address in Columbia, Md., in March 2012, while the second came from Waipahu, Hawaii, two months later. The first contribution describes the donor as an employee of Dell, a company Snowden has done contract work for in recent years. Snowden is from Maryland, and most recently for Booz

Allen Hamilton in Hawaii. In addition, Snowden believes the Boston Bombing was a criminal act, not an act of terrorism: "We have to decide why terrorism is a new threat. There has always been terrorism. Boston was a criminal act. It was not about surveillance but good, old-fashioned police work. The police are very good at what they do." Ron Paul: ―While the media crowed that the apprehension of the suspects was a triumph of the new surveillance state – and, predictably, many talking heads and Members of Congress called for even more government cameras pointed at the rest of us – the fact is none of this caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gave the suspect a chance to make a getaway.‖ LIKE HITLER RON PAUL PLAYS ON IRRATIONAL FEAR "I'm worried about somebody in our government might kill him with a cruise missile or a drone missile. I mean, we live in a bad time where American citizens don't even have rights and that they can be killed, but the gentlemen is trying to tell the truth about what's going on. He's not defecting, there are no signs of that happening. It‘s a shame that we are in an age where people who tell the truth about what the government is doing gets into trouble. No, I don't think for a minute that he's a traitor.‖ What are the odds of Obama ordering a drone strike on Edward Snowden? Is it in the realm of possibility or is Ron Paul tapping the vast reservoir of ignorance in America as Hitler did in Germany. Snowden is giving the Chinese classified documents. In a interview with a Government controlled Chinese newspaper he revealed the the US National Security Agency‘s controversial Prism program extends to people and institutions in Hong Kong and mainland China. Snowden said that according to unverified documents seen by the South China Post, the NSA had been hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009. None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese military systems, he said. One of the targets in the SAR, according to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking activity by the NSA against mainland targets. Snowden believed there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally, with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland. ―We hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically – that give us access to the communications of hundreds of thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,‖ he said.1 According to Senator Lindsey Graham the biggest threat to U.S. intelligence these days is young men like Snowden and Private Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking a trove of national security documents published by Wikileaks. ―I think that there‘s a group of people, younger people who are not fighting the war, who are libertarians mostly, who feel like the government is the problem,‖ Graham said, ―that those who are trained to defend us are a bigger threat than those who are trying to attack us. If somebody finally goes to jail for destroying our national security and weakening our national defenses, maybe the next 29-year-old who thinks

1. http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1259508/edward-snowden-us-government-has-beenhacking-hong-kong-and-china

that they‘re going to be some cult figure will think twice. If we can run [Snowden] down, it‘s imperative that we catch him. I don‘t care where he goes, I don‘t care what we need to do, we need to bring this guy to justice for deterrence sake.‖ Senator Graham wondered whether young "libertarian" types could be trusted to serve in classified positions when they proved that they weren't keen on the strategy. Graham was asked if Snowden's donations to Ron Paul were the sort of warning signs vetters should have looked out for. "No, no," said Graham. "I think people that give donations to Ron Paul are exercising their right to participate in the political process. Ron Paul isn't a threat to America. His policies are." This is another reason why Ron Paul is the most dangerous Nazi in America in or out of office. He inspired a traitor to weaken our defense against terrorism. PRISM was successfully used to stop a harmful attack on American citizens. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) said the NSA surveillance successfully stopped a terrorist attack ―within the last few years.‖ PRISM stopped a terror attack on the NYC subway. Najibullah Zazi was captured by the Feds when an Al Qaeda email was traced back to his computer, thanks to the massive data mining the NSA is doing.

RON PAUL’S HOME INDOCTRINATION CURRICULUM
In April 2013 when Ron Paul announced a new online curriculum for home-school-ers, he named Gary North as director of curriculum development. North, 71, is not a professional educator. He is a leading theorist of Christian Reconstructionism, a Christian Identity spinoff movement that denounces democracy, thinks some forms of slavery are OK and wants to impose a draconian version of biblical law that prescribes the death penalty for gays, adulterers, blasphemers, witches and incorrigible children, among others. In a 2003 column, Paul wrote, ―The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers.‖2 North‘s theocracy has all the markings of a Nazi-like regime; however Paul tries to obscure this by attacking one facet of Nazi education: A common feature of authoritarian regimes is the criminalization of alternatives to governmentcontrolled education. Dictators recognize the danger that free thought poses to their rule, and few things promote the thinking of ―unapproved‖ thoughts like an education cont rolled by parents instead of the state. That is why the National Socialist (Nazi) government of Germany outlawed homeschooling in 1938. Since Ron Paul is supplying the curriculum for home education it is going to be him controlling the education rather than the State and those ―unapproved thoughts‖ or ―politically incorrect‖ thoughts such as those in found his newsletters would be used to inculcate children.

2. https://www.au.org/church-state/june-2013-church-state/featured/ron-pauls-appalling-pal

THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBING
Here Ron Paul intimates that the Federal Government staged this event as a practice drill for martial law.

Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston by Ron Paul
Forced lockdown of a city. Militarized police riding tanks in the streets. Door-to-door armed searches without warrant. Families thrown out of their homes at gunpoint to be searched without probable cause. Businesses forced to close. Transport shut down. These were not the scenes from a military coup in a far off banana republic, but rather the scenes just over a week ago in Boston as the United States got a taste of martial law. This was not martial law. There was no curfew. Most people were happy to go through what they had to go through in order to avoid becoming a victim of Islamist terror. The ostensible reason for the military-style takeover of parts of Boston was that the accused perpetrator of a horrific crime was on the loose. Note the use of the word ―ostensible.‖ Represented or appearing as such; ostensive: His ostensible purpose was charity, but his real goal was popularity. A terrorist on the loose was not the real reason for the lockdown. What was the real reason? The Boston bombing provided the opportunity for the government to turn what should have been a police investigation into a military-style occupation of an American city. This unprecedented move should frighten us as much or more than the attack itself. So three people dying, numerous other‘s crippled for life, many deafened, hundreds seriously injured is less frightening than a comprehensive police dragnet for the perpetrators. What has been sadly forgotten in all the celebration of the capture of one suspect and the killing of his older brother is that the police state tactics in Boston did absolutely nothing to catch them. An outright lie. Everyone was on alert and when someone saw that the covering on their boat had been disturbed they called police. While the media crowed that the apprehension of the suspects was a triumph of the new surveillance state – and, predictably, many talking heads and Members of Congress called for even more government cameras pointed at the rest of us – the fact is none of this caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gave the suspect a chance to make a getaway. The police were able to accurately identify the terrorist by piecing together numerous videos. This is another outright lie but what do you expect from a crypto-Nazi? The ―shelter in place‖ command imposed by the governor of Massachusetts was lifted before the suspect was caught. Only after this police state move was ended did the owner of the boat go outside to check on his property, and in so doing discover the suspect.

Liar. He said he saw it from his window. ―Like all Watertown residents, Henneberry stayed in his Franklin Street home as the hunt for Tsarnaev paralyzed much of eastern Massachusetts on Friday. When he looked out the window at his boat at one point during the day, he noticed something was amiss. "I put pads between the shrink wrap, and it stopped the chaffing and two of those had fallen down to the ground. It was really windy, so I didn't think twice about it," he said.‖3 No, the suspect was not discovered by the paramilitary troops terrorizing the public. He was discovered by a private citizen, who then placed a call to the police. And he was identified not by government surveillance cameras, but by private citizens who willingly shared their photographs with the police. The troops were protecting the public, the terrorists were terrorizing the public. The police in this case was the FBI. Of course the Federal Government does not have cameras in Boston. As journalist Tim Carney wrote last week: ―Law enforcement in Boston used cameras to ID the bombing suspects, but not police cameras. Instead, authorities asked the public to submit all photos and videos of the finish-line area to the FBI, just in case any of them had relevant images. The surveillance videos the FBI posted online of the suspects came from private businesses that use surveillance to punish and deter crime on their property.‖ So the police cameras did not get a good shot of the suspects. Most are used for traffic control, not crime. The photos would have been worthless if not for the skill of the FBI, which Paul wants to abolish. Sadly, we have been conditioned to believe that the job of the government is to keep us safe, but in reality the job of the government is to protect our liberties. Once the government decides that its role is to keep us safe, whether economically or physically, they can only do so by taking away our liberties. That is what happened in Boston. Liberty is worthless if you are dead. Anyway Paul‘s idea of liberty is the freedom to kill Jews and segregate Blacks or send them back to Africa. He wants to see more terrorist attacks take place in America as he basically hates the U.S. which he believes is controlled by ZOG, the Zionist Occupational Government. He will never say this openly but this is his sick mindset. Three people were killed in Boston and that is tragic. But what of the fact that over 40 persons are killed in the United States each day, and sometimes ten persons can be killed in one city on any given weekend? These cities are not locked-down by paramilitary police riding in tanks and pointing automatic weapons at innocent citizens. Note how Paul fails to mention those who lost their legs, hearing and more. Over 200. BUT? BUT? He qualifies this tragedy He is the lowest scum on earth.

3

http://www.wcvb.com/news/local/metro/Watertown-boat-owner-David-Henneberry-tells-story-of-findingBoston-Marathon-suspect/-/11971628/19863572/-/mpx0qq/-/index.html#ixzz2RwvfTXlE

This is unprecedented and is very dangerous. We must educate ourselves and others about our precious civil liberties to ensure that we never accept demands that we give up our Constitution so that the government can pretend to protect us. Pretend to protect us? They rounded up the Islamist scum before they could set their bombs off in Times Square. Paul would have loved to see NYC attacked because of all the Jews there.

RON PAUL INSTITUTE

FACULTY
Ron Paul has cleverly chosen certain figures from academia, the media and the CIA who further his totalitarian political goal. These individuals are all pieces in a puzzle that when assembled displays a swastika.

John Laughland, a British writer who is a prominent defender of the late Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. Laughland has also defended Ukraine‘s Kremlin-backed president Viktor Yanukovich whose attempt to steal the 2004 election sparked that country‘s peaceful ―Orange Revolution‖. He lamented the fate of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Europe‘s last dictator. The common thread is totalitarianism and its intellectual justification as in Mein Kampf.

Oxford historian Mark Almond: A trustee of a sinister and deceptively named organization, the British Helsinki Human Rights Group (BHHRG), which trades on the good name of the international civil liberties monitoring organizations founded as a result of the 1975 Helsinki accords. The BHHRG was an early defender of Milosevic and Serbian behavior in the Balkans generally. The BHHRG hates gypsies just as the Nazis did.

Judge Andrew Napolitano, a former legal analyst for Fox News who has said that ―It‘s hard for me to believe that [7 World Trade Center] came down by itself‖ and that the 9/11 attacks ―couldn‘t possibly have been done the way the government told us.‖ Ron Paul is the new Hitler and he is the new Mussolini. The Nazi Willis Carto is a fan of Judge Andrew Napolitano and this appeared on his website. Focusing on FBI claims that since 9-11 it has foiled multiple alleged terrorist plots to kill Americans, Napolitano pointed out that while there were some 20 such incidents, three were interrupted by private citizens who observed suspicious activity. But the remaining 17 that were ―solved‖ by the feds all had a common and reprehensible thread: They were planned, plotted, controlled and carried out by the federal government itself. Not unlike the 1993 first attack on the World Trade Center, the FBI had agents or informants befriend young Muslim men by luring them into cooperation with encouragement about being ―like-minded‖ and anti-American. Then, of course, they were arrested before any damage could be done—followed by great hoopla the next day. Napolitano also tackled Israel‘s prime role in promoting a United States war against Iran, and this may have been the final straw for those signing his paycheck. The judge‘s final guest and source of information was Michael Scheuer, the former chief of the CIA‘s Osama bin Laden-watching unit. While Scheuer accepts the U.S. government claim that bin Laden was the architect of 9-11, a point many researchers reject, he is a courageous critic of Israel and its U.S. lobby and, as Napolitano‘s guest, pointed out that a war against Iran benefits Israel and Saudi Arabia but not the United States.

Eric Margolis who says that ―conclusive proof still lacks‖ connecting Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks and has speculated that the events could have been ―a plot by America‘s far right or by Israel or a giant cover-up.‖ Eric Margolis is the son of Henry Margolis, a Jewish Am erican industrialist, and Nexhmie Zaimi, an Albanian Muslim journalist. Margolis supports the Islamic Caucasian Emirate that perpetrated the Boston Massacre. Margolis is a supporter of terrorism and has been singled out by Al Qaeda as some who can be trusted. He characterizes Hamas and Islamic Jihad as ―Palestinian resistance groups‖ whose sole objective is to resist Israeli occupation, not menace America. This despite the fact that Margolis is undoubtedly well aware that the stated goal of both Hamas and Islamic Jihad is the total destruction of Israel and its replacement with a radical Muslim theocracy. Under this genocidal scenario, Israeli Jews would be slaughtered and their survivors forced to live under the brutal rule of their new Islamist overlords.

Southwestern Law School professor Butler Shaffer, in an article for Rockwell‘s site titled, ―9/11 Was a Conspiracy,‖ asks, ―In light of the lies, forgeries, cover -ups, and other deceptions leading to a ‗war‘ in Iraq, how can any intellectually honest person categorically deny the possibility of the involvement of American political interests in 9/11?‖ The current practice of accusing the Iranian government of warlike intentions in order to rationalize one's own desires to attack that country is one example. Shaffer blames Israel and America for 9/11, not the Islamists. ―Our wartime suffering is causally connected with the suffering we inflict upon others. If we are to understand the nature of our blood-stained world, we must abandon our self-righteous definitions of ―good‖ and ―evil‖ and see our problems in terms of their interconnectedness. Only fools will accept the ―they hate us for our freedom and our values‖ rationale for this war. The reality is that others hate us for the wrongs our government has inflicted upon them; and we hate those who retaliate against us for such wrongs.

Walter Block, an neo-Confederate Jewish professor of economics and fellow at the Mises Institute. He is the mentally ill Jew who has replaced Murray Rothbard as the Jew the cryptoNazis keep around for laughs. Block is nuts and his writing makes little sense. Here he defends the rights of the Muslims to threaten the artists who did caricatures of Mohammad. However, there is a plethora of other instances where this is not at all true. For example, suppose some cartoons were published that did not depict Muhammad in an unflattering light, but, rather, blacks with big lips shuffling along or tap dancing, Jews with long noses looking avaricious and holding bags of money, or hordes of Orientals with a "yellow menace" caption. If anything is clear, it is that in most western nations such caricatures would be deemed "hate speech" and their authors clapped into prison forthwith. The same applies to the use of such words as "nigger," "kike," "spic," "chink," "wop," "greaser," "cunt," when used in an attempt to denigrate certain favored groups of people. ("Honky" would not likely result in the same fate.) And what of holocaust denial? In many "progressive" nations denying this historical event, or making fun of it, is a violation of law. David Irving now languishes in an Austrian prison for engaging in his free speech rights on this topic. An Islamic group in Holland posted a cartoon of Hitler and Ann Frank in bed with each other; but for the present conflagration, this would have likely resulted in a jail sentence for them. An argument has been made by Kathleen Parker that there is a dis-analogy here. She says: "… the Nazis … were officially sanctioned enforcers of immoral social orders that used caricature to further degrade and dehumanize beleaguered minorities they ultimately murdered. There is no equivalence between organized murder on behalf of a malignant social system and a-half-dozen nerdy artists, speaking only for themselves, lampooning a fanatical religious sect…" But David Irving is not a Nazi. He murdered no one. He merely engaged in press freedom, or free speech. The same applies to those who use the racial and sexual expletives mentioned above. Yes, great evil was perpetrated by those who used this denigrating language, and by those who sported Nazi regalia. The Nazis murdered millions (the Communists murdered tens of millions; when Prince Harry donned the swastika he was roundly condemned; had he treated the hammer and sickle in a similar manner, it would have passed unremarked, but that is another story). But it is still a logical fallacy to claim that all who adopt their regalia, mannerisms, goose-stepping, etc., are equally guilty; even that they are guilty of any crime at all. In my own opinion, just as in the case of prostitution, pornography, addictive drugs, these are not nice things; but from the libertarian perspective they are victimless crimes and should not be punished by law, or through extra-legal sanctions: rioting.

Michael Scheuer, a former CIA intelligence officer, who blames Israel for Islamism. Block and Scheuer are covered in this book.

Leverett has challenged Western conventional wisdom on the Islamic Republic of Iran‘s foreign policy and internal politics, documented the historical record of previous Iranian cooperation with the United States, and presented the seminal argument in American foreign policy circles for a U.S.-Iranian ―grand bargain‖. His new book, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic (also co-authored with Hillary Mann Leverett), will be published in 2012. The Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism (YIISA) was founded in 2006. Its purpose was to provide a scholarly approach to the study of contemporary and historical antiSemitism. It was attached to Yale's Institution of Social and Policy Studies. It was fully funded from private contributions. Deputy Provost and Political Science Professor Frances Rosenbluth served on the faculty committee that reviewed YIISA's performance and concluded that the university should close the center. In recent years Rosenbluth appointed Iran-regime apologists Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett to serve as senior fellows at Yale's Jackson Institute for Global Affairs. Last September the Leveretts brought their students to New York to hold a seminar for them with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Unlike the YIISA conference, the move did not stimulate any significant controversy at the university.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Blasts 'Politicized' U.S. Intelligence on Syria, Raises Prospect of Obama Impeachment

Austrian economist Professor Robert Higgs in a recent talk narrates of how US president Franklin D. Roosevelt baited the Japanese into attacking the US that paved way for America‘s participation in World War II.

Who knows why Paul dug up this retread but she might still have some connection to the Intelligence Community. Ron Paul knows every facet of American society that exhibits Jew hating tendencies and he is determined to unite them.

PAUL DIVERTS WHAT IS LEFT OF HIS CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO DAUGHTER LORI PYEATT
On March 11, 2012, according to the Center For Public Integrity, the Committee to Re-Elect Ron Paul donated $150,000 to the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, a nonprofit group Paul himself founded in 1976, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission. Carol Paul, his wife, is the group's president, IRS documents show. By law, political campaign committees may contribute unlimited surplus funds to 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofits such as the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, and there's no prohibition on a former candidate directing those funds to his or her own charity. Although Ron‘s Paul‘s wife gets no salary his daughter, Lori Pyeatt gets 60K a year for doing nothing. Internal Revenue Code Section 4958. Taxes on excess benefit transactions: Disqualified Persons (4) Family members The members of an individual's family shall be determined under section 4946(d); except that such members also shall include the brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood) of the individual and their spouses.

GIVE RON PAUL A RAW MILK ENEMA
Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and in office or out of office he is a threat. He is not much of a doctor, and will never make any great advances in medicine as others, such as Louis Pasteur, have. But Ron Paul thinks he knows better than Pasteur. Despite scientific evidence that raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks in 2013 Paul tacitly recommended raw milk to his zombies. On May 11, 2011 Paul introduced H.R. 1830, a bill that would effectively overturn the federal prohibition on raw milk for human consumption in interstate commerce. Paul, who had introduced the same bill in the previous session of Congress remarked, ―Hard as it is to believe, the federal government is actually spending time and money prosecuting small businesses for the ―crime‖ of meeting their customer‘s demand for unpasteurized milk! Americans have the right to consume these products without having the federal government second-guess their judgment about what products best promote health.‖ According to an analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between 1993 and 2006 more than 1500 people in the United States became sick from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk. In addition, CDC reported that unpasteurized milk is 150 times more likely to cause food-borne illness and results in 13 times more hospitalizations than illnesses involving pasteurized dairy products. This is Paul‘s latest Nazi newsletter:

WHEN THEY CAME FOR THE RAW MILK DRINKERS…by Ron Paul
While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be disarmed: federal agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty. Too often Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and the federal bureaucracy. Of course Paul wants to disarm Federal Agents. He is a neo-Confederate who opposes a strong central government. And who decides if these laws are unjust, unconstitutional and a threat to liberty? The Courts? No Ron Paul does. He will decide if the laws are a threat to his version of liberty, ―liberty‖ to commit genocide. For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome‘s founder, 65-year old James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese to willing customers – in a state where raw milk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit! James Stewart jumped bail, having failed to show up for two court appearances. In one of cases, he was out on a $30,000 bail in Los Angeles County on charges of illegally selling raw milk. In the other, he was out of a $100,000 bail in Ventura County on charges of illegally raising funds for Sharon Palmer‘s Healthy Family Farms, according to an article in The Complete Patient. Stewart was into the notion of the ‗sovereign man,‘ which urges people to claim their ‗Common Law Inherent Rights‘ and defend themselves against ―all levels of abuse from Government and Statutes.‖ Sharon Palmer supplies Rawesome Foods with raw goat milk and other dairy products from what is known as a ‗herdshare.‘ Under a herdshare arrangement, the members don‘t consider themselves as buying the milk since they own the animals. Palmer has no license to sell raw milk in California, a state which does allow retail sales of raw milk but which also has very strict laws governing raw-milk production and sales. This is hardly the only case of federal agents using force against those who would dare meet consumer demand for raw milk. In 2011 armed agents of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raided the business of Pennsylvanian Amish farmer Dan Allgyer. Federal agents wasted a whole year and who knows how many millions of our tax dollars posing as customers in order to stop Allgyer from selling his raw milk to willing customers. On February 2, 2012 Federal District Court Judge Lawrence F. Stengel ordered a permanent injunction against dairy farmer Dan Allgyer prohibiting Allgyer from distributing raw milk and raw milk products across state lines; under Judge Stengel‘s order, the injunction was to be in place for a minimum of five years Stengel found that Allgyer sold raw milk to members of

Grassfed On The Hill, a food buyers club, at various distribution points in Maryland and the District of Columbia in violation of federal labeling laws (the milk containers Allgyer distributed were unlabeled) and the federal regulation prohibiting raw milk and raw milk products (other than raw cheese aged at least 60 days) in interstate commerce. As a result Allgyer closed down his operation. The use of force against individuals making choices not approved of by the political elite does not just stop with raw milk. The Natural News website has documented numerous accounts of federal persecution, including armed raids, of health food stores and alternative medical practitioners. The Nazi newspaper Spotlight, that supported Ron Paul ran stories like Peroxide for Improved Health by T. Valentine, an interview with Fr. Richard Willhelm, SPOTLIGHT, August, 1986. They advertisers were the purveyors of quack cures.

These type of police state tactics used against, among others, raw milk producers, and alternative health providers is justified by the paternalistic attitude common in Washington, D.C. A member of Congress actually once told me that, ―The people need these types of laws because they do not know what is good for them.‖ This mindset fuels the growth of the nanny state and inevitably leads to what C.S. Lewis said may be the worst from of tyranny ―…a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims.‖ All Americans, even if they do not believe it is a wise choice to drink raw milk should be concerned about the use of force to limit our choices. This is because there is no limiting principle to the idea that the government force is justified if used ―for our own good.‖ Today it is those who sell raw milk who are being victimized by government force, tomorrow it could be those who sell soda pop or Styrofoam cups. Therefore, all Americans should speak out against these injustices.

African Americans between the ages of 20 and 39 were shown to have the most fast food and supersized non-diet soda in their diet when compared with their Caucasian and Hispanic counterparts, as one-fifth of their calorie intake came from quick service restaurants. Just another part of Ron‘s Paul‘s ridden racist agenda.

Christopher Scott "Chris" Kyle (April 8, 1974 – February 2, 2013) was a Navy SEAL and the most lethal sniper in American military history, with 160 confirmed kills (out of 255 claimed kills). He was shot and killed in a rifle range on February 2, 2013, in Texas, while trying to help another vet get over PTSD. People were shocked at this tweet but I was not. I know Paul is a Nazi so for him Jews are the cause of all the misery in the world. Since Kyle shot the enemies of the Jews, Kyle became Paul‘s enemy. After he got heat for this remark he wrote, ―As a veteran, I certainly recognize that this weekend's violence and killing of Chris Kyle were a tragic and sad event. My condolences and prayers go out to Mr. Kyle‘s family. Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endless unintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christ preached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies.‖ But one week later he was back to his original position: ―The warning that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword" goes not only for individuals but for entire societies. It is a warning to all of us. A country or a society that lives with the violence of pre-emptive war in fact self-destructs.‖ If you have info on Ron Paul contact me at [email protected]

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close