Ensuring Value for Premiums
Content
National Minimum Medical Loss Ratio Would Save Tens of Billions of Dollars For Businesses, Individuals
DECEMBER 2009
www.mainstreetalliance.org
2
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
National Minimum Medical Loss Ratio Would Save Tens of Billions of Dollars For Businesses, Individuals
Only 16 years agO, health insurance companies spent almost all of the premiums they collected to pay for actual health services. The leading insurers used 95 cents of every premium dollar on medical benefits, according to the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, a benchmark the industry referred to as a 95 percent “medical loss ratio.”1 That was in 1993, the year President Clinton proposed comprehensive health reform. Within 12 months the insurance industry had torpedoed the plan and reform was dead. experts correctly forecast it would be many years before Washington tackled the issue again. ever since, health insurance executives have pursued mergers, acquisitions and initial public offerings that have turned the for-profit health insurance industry into a juggernaut.2 Wall street investors cheered as private, for-profit companies grew at a feverish pace. CeOs spent lavishly on sales and advertising to win market share away from home-grown non-profits that traditionally had low marketing costs. In response, non-profits had to behave more like for-profits, stepping up spending on sales and marketing and intensifying efforts to exclude the sick.3,4 Many non-profits decided that if they couldn’t beat the for-profits, they should join them. Beginning in the mid-1990s, more than a dozen non-profit Blue Cross companies that dominated their state markets converted into for-profit companies and were eventually acquired to form the nation’s biggest investor-owned insurer, WellPoint Inc. last year, WellPoint reported about 35 million members, the most of any private plan.5
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
along the way, health insurers’ medical loss ratios plummeted even as medical costs and premiums grew faster than overall inflation. By 2007 investorowned health insurers had reduced spending on actual medical care to 81 percent of premiums collected, according to the analysis by PricewaterhouseCoopers, which often consults with the health insurance industry’s main trade group.6 The remaining 19 percent of premiums went to profits, marketing, executive salaries, administrative expenses, sales commissions, and the cost of weeding out sick people whose conditions might make them unprofitable to insure.7 although the PricewaterhouseCoopers study gives an average for major investor owned insurance companies, other studies have found that in the individual and small group markets smaller insurers routinely have medical loss ratios that are much lower. a recent study of these markets found many as low as 60 percent.8 By comparison, the public Medicare program has consistently had a benefit ratio greater than 97 percent since 1993.9 In an effort to restore balance to the health insurance industry and protect consumers, the senate bill should set a minimum medical loss ratio of 90 percent for health insurers.10 Health plans falling short of the minimum would be required to rebate the difference to their customers—a powerful incentive to meet the standard. This is a crucial policy that would rein in the skyrocketing health costs that have demolished jobs, left nearly 50 million people uninsured and burdened doctors and hospitals with the costs of caring for people without insurance.11
3
a new minimum medical loss ratio and requirements that health insurance plans conform to standardized benefits packages (with standardized enrollment and claims forms) would save significant sums and end industry practices that encourage the marketing of needlessly complicated plans, which enable insurers to game the system and sidestep legitimate medical costs. Over 10 years the amendment would reap hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for beleaguered employers as well
as families that buy insurance directly, according to andrew Kurz, former chief financial officer of Blue Cross Blue shield of Wisconsin. setting this benchmark for operating efficiency would function as a mini-stimulus package, redirecting tens of billions of dollars to individuals and small businesses and creating or saving jobs that would otherwise be casualties of rising health insurance costs.12
Raising Medical Loss Ratios Would Produce Huge Rebates for Businesses, Individuals13
Amount of Premium Dollars Spent on Medical Care Versus Insurance Costs Under Three Scenarios, 2008 (in billions of dollars)
$54.5 $130.8 $76.3
$94.6 $36.1
$686.6
$686.6
$686.6
81% MLR
90% MLR
95% MLR
amount available for rebates n Profits and administrative costs for private health insurance n Premiums spent on medical care
4
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Impact of Minimum Medical Loss Ratio on Premiums
$817 billion 81 percent 90 percent about 50 percent $36.8 billion $368 billion $54.5 billion 95 percent 14 percentage points $94.6 billion based on enrollment-weighted average
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Private health insurance premiums, 200814
average medical loss ratio of investor owned private health insurance companies, 200715
Minimum medical loss ratio proposed in Senate amendment16
Share of private health insurance enrollment controlled by investor-owned companies, 200817
Money available under Senate amendment for rebate to members of investor-owned health plans, 2008
10-year savings to enrollees in investor-owned insurers from Senate amendment’s minimum medical loss ratio
Rough estimate of money available for rebate from all health insurers, assuming national medical loss ratio of 90 percent and enrollment-weighted average
average medical loss ratio for investor-owned insurers, 199318
Percentage difference between 1993 and 2007 medical loss ratios of investor-owned insurers
Dollar difference between 1993 and 2007 medical loss ratios of investor-owned insurers based on 2008 premium revenues
5
Endnotes
1 PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml. 2 Health Care for america now, “net Income of Major U.s. Health Insurers, 2000 – 2008 (in millions),” 2009. accessed at http:// healthcareforamericanow.org/page/-/documents for download/090728 net Income of Major Health Insurers 2000-2008 - Final-1.pdf. 3 government accountability Office, “Private Health Insurance: 2008 survey results on number and Market share ofCarriers in the small group Health Insurance Market,” Febuary 27, 2009. accessed at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09363r.pdf. 4 shaya Tayefe Mohajer, “state didn’t try to collect fine from Blue CrossHealth care enforcers admit they knew they’d be outgunned in court,” associated Press, July 4, 2008. accessed at http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/04/BUsB11JV3B.DTl. 5 Wellpoint, “10-K statement ending December 31, 2008,” 2009. accessed at http://ir.wellpoint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130104&p=irol-seCText&T eXT=aHr0cDovl2njym4uMTBrd2l6yXJklmnvbs94bWwvZmlsaW5nlnhtbD9yZXBvPXrlbmsmaXBhZ2U9nje1Mzc0MyZhdHrhy2g9T04mc1h CUkw9MQ%3d%3d. 6 7
The medical loss ratios are based on premium figures from fully insured covered lives.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml; Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line—and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/theinsurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html
8 9
Families Usa, “Medical loss ratios: evidence from the states” June 2008. accessed at http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/medical-loss-ratio.pdf. Center for Medicare and Medicaid services Congressional record. accessed at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r111:29:./temp/~r111UWhue5:e140480.
10 11
Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line -- and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/the-insurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html.
12
neeraj sood, neeraj, arkadipta ghosh, and José J. escarce (2009). “employer-sponsored Insurance, Health Care Cost growth, and the economic Performance of U.s. Industries” Health research services. Online: http://www.hsr.org/hsr/abstract.jsp?aid=594371976.
13 Figures in the chart are based on an 81% medical loss ratio for the largest investor owned insurers. Together the insurers cover more than 100 million people, or 50 percent of those insured by private insurers. The amount available for a rebate is calculated using 50 percent of the amount spent nationally on private insurance premiums. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, “national Health expenditure Projections 20082018.” accessed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/nationalHealthexpendData/downloads/proj2008.pdf. 14 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, “national Health expenditure Projections 2008-2018.” accessed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ nationalHealthexpendData/downloads/proj2008.pdf. 15
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml.
16 Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line -- and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/the-insurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html. 17 University’s John F. Kennedy school of government,”Health Care Delivery Covered lives – summary of Findings,” The Health Care Delivery Policy Program, 2008. accessed at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/hcdp/numbers/Covered lives summary.pdf. 18
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml.
6
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Data for Largest Health Insurers in Selected States, 2008*
Revenue from Premiums (in millions of dollars)** Medical Loss Ratio 83.0% 83.6% 83.6% 88.1% 82.0% 83.6% 84.0% 83.6% 87.4% 83.6% 82.0% 83.6% 85.1% 83.6% $9,687 $10,079 $47,736 $3,126 $10,563 $2,707 $8,873 87.9% 88.3% 83.6% 86.6% 84.0% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 1.9% 8.0% 6.4% 6.0% 6.4% 2.6% 6.4% 8.0% 6.4% 4.9% 6.4% 2.1% 1.7% 6.4% 3.4% 6.0% 90% 6.4% 90% 6.4% 90% 7.0% Senate Proposed Minimum MLR Percent Difference $1,071 $57,101 $57,101 $6,320 $73,608 $57,101 $2,115 $57,101 $9,880 $57,101 $73,608 $57,101 $12,590 $57,101 $11,020 $11,414 $57,101 $10,714 $47,736 $47,736 $60,359 $47,736 $8,640 $47,736 $1,777 $47,736 $60,359 $5,568 $47,736 $47,736 $889 Medical Costs (in millions of dollars) Total Available for Rebates to Members $75,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $120,000,000 $5,889,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $127,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $252,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $5,889,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $617,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $231 ,000,000 $194 ,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $106,000,000 $634,000,000
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
State
Insurer
arkansas
BCBS aR
Californiat
Wellpoint
Connecticutt
Wellpoint
Delawaret
CareFirst BCBS
Floridat
UnitedHealth
Indianat
WellPoint
Louisiana
BCBS La
Mainet
WellPoint
Michigan
BCBS MI
Missourit
WellPoint
Nevadat
UnitedHealth
New Hampshiret
WellPoint
North Carolina
BCBS NC
Ohiot
WellPoint
Pennsylvania
Highmark BlueCross Blue Shield
Pennsylvania
Independence BlueCross
Virginiat
WellPoint
Washingtont
Premera
West Virginiat
Coventry
7
* all work is based upon the best publicly available data on premium revenues and medical claims costs. **Data from National association of Insurance Commissioners and company filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ending Dec. 31, 2008. Premium figures are for fully insured covered lives. t The largest insurer in this state is a multi-state insurer. all figures include data from all states where the company operates.
8
Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Data for Largest Investor-Owned Multi-State Commercial Health Insurers, 2008*
Medical Loss Ratio Covered Lives (in thousands) Risk-Based $20,788 $60,359 $7,253 $47,736 $8,873 $23,714 $10,769 $179,492 83.1% 90% 6.9% 50,059 86.9% 90% 3.1% 2,864 84.5% 90% 5.5% 8,218 2,870 856 58,938 84.0% 90% 6.0% 2,910 1,718 83.6% 90% 6.4% 16,529 18,520 81.9% 90% 8.1% 3,583 8,096 11,679 35,049 4,628 11,088 3,720 108,997 82.0% 90% 8.0% 10,360 15,985 26,345 81.5% 90% 8.5% 5,595 10,893 16,488 Fee-Based Total $2,168,100,000 $5,888,600,000 $717,300,000 $3,654,500,000 $633,800,000 $1,543,500,000 $384,200,000 $14,990,000,000 Senate Proposed Minimum MLR Percent Difference Money Available for Rebate to Members
Revenue from Medical Costs Premiums (in (in millions of millions of dollars)* dollars)
aetna
$25,507
UnitedHealth Group $8,856 $57,101
$73,608
Cigna
Wellpoint
Coventry
$10,563
Humana
$28,064
Healthnet
$12,392
Total Premiums and Volume-Weighted average MLR
$216,091
* Total medical premiums from company SEC filings for the year ending Dec. 31, 2008. Premiums are for fully insured covered lives. ** Estimated value of rebates for fully insured enrollees. Does not include administrative-service-only customers.
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Medical Benefit Ratios of Private Insurers, Public Medicare Plan, 1993–2007
Percentage of federal Medicare benefit outlays spent on medical care compared with percentage of premium revenue spent on medical care by investor-owned private insurance companies
100%
96
95% ▼
Medicare
97.9%
94 92 90 88 86 84 82 80
Investor-Owned Insurers
81%* ▼
’93 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07
*Estimated Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute, U.S. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
▼
9
97.7% 98 ▼
DECEMBER 2009
www.mainstreetalliance.org
2
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
National Minimum Medical Loss Ratio Would Save Tens of Billions of Dollars For Businesses, Individuals
Only 16 years agO, health insurance companies spent almost all of the premiums they collected to pay for actual health services. The leading insurers used 95 cents of every premium dollar on medical benefits, according to the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, a benchmark the industry referred to as a 95 percent “medical loss ratio.”1 That was in 1993, the year President Clinton proposed comprehensive health reform. Within 12 months the insurance industry had torpedoed the plan and reform was dead. experts correctly forecast it would be many years before Washington tackled the issue again. ever since, health insurance executives have pursued mergers, acquisitions and initial public offerings that have turned the for-profit health insurance industry into a juggernaut.2 Wall street investors cheered as private, for-profit companies grew at a feverish pace. CeOs spent lavishly on sales and advertising to win market share away from home-grown non-profits that traditionally had low marketing costs. In response, non-profits had to behave more like for-profits, stepping up spending on sales and marketing and intensifying efforts to exclude the sick.3,4 Many non-profits decided that if they couldn’t beat the for-profits, they should join them. Beginning in the mid-1990s, more than a dozen non-profit Blue Cross companies that dominated their state markets converted into for-profit companies and were eventually acquired to form the nation’s biggest investor-owned insurer, WellPoint Inc. last year, WellPoint reported about 35 million members, the most of any private plan.5
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
along the way, health insurers’ medical loss ratios plummeted even as medical costs and premiums grew faster than overall inflation. By 2007 investorowned health insurers had reduced spending on actual medical care to 81 percent of premiums collected, according to the analysis by PricewaterhouseCoopers, which often consults with the health insurance industry’s main trade group.6 The remaining 19 percent of premiums went to profits, marketing, executive salaries, administrative expenses, sales commissions, and the cost of weeding out sick people whose conditions might make them unprofitable to insure.7 although the PricewaterhouseCoopers study gives an average for major investor owned insurance companies, other studies have found that in the individual and small group markets smaller insurers routinely have medical loss ratios that are much lower. a recent study of these markets found many as low as 60 percent.8 By comparison, the public Medicare program has consistently had a benefit ratio greater than 97 percent since 1993.9 In an effort to restore balance to the health insurance industry and protect consumers, the senate bill should set a minimum medical loss ratio of 90 percent for health insurers.10 Health plans falling short of the minimum would be required to rebate the difference to their customers—a powerful incentive to meet the standard. This is a crucial policy that would rein in the skyrocketing health costs that have demolished jobs, left nearly 50 million people uninsured and burdened doctors and hospitals with the costs of caring for people without insurance.11
3
a new minimum medical loss ratio and requirements that health insurance plans conform to standardized benefits packages (with standardized enrollment and claims forms) would save significant sums and end industry practices that encourage the marketing of needlessly complicated plans, which enable insurers to game the system and sidestep legitimate medical costs. Over 10 years the amendment would reap hundreds of billions of dollars in savings for beleaguered employers as well
as families that buy insurance directly, according to andrew Kurz, former chief financial officer of Blue Cross Blue shield of Wisconsin. setting this benchmark for operating efficiency would function as a mini-stimulus package, redirecting tens of billions of dollars to individuals and small businesses and creating or saving jobs that would otherwise be casualties of rising health insurance costs.12
Raising Medical Loss Ratios Would Produce Huge Rebates for Businesses, Individuals13
Amount of Premium Dollars Spent on Medical Care Versus Insurance Costs Under Three Scenarios, 2008 (in billions of dollars)
$54.5 $130.8 $76.3
$94.6 $36.1
$686.6
$686.6
$686.6
81% MLR
90% MLR
95% MLR
amount available for rebates n Profits and administrative costs for private health insurance n Premiums spent on medical care
4
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Impact of Minimum Medical Loss Ratio on Premiums
$817 billion 81 percent 90 percent about 50 percent $36.8 billion $368 billion $54.5 billion 95 percent 14 percentage points $94.6 billion based on enrollment-weighted average
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Private health insurance premiums, 200814
average medical loss ratio of investor owned private health insurance companies, 200715
Minimum medical loss ratio proposed in Senate amendment16
Share of private health insurance enrollment controlled by investor-owned companies, 200817
Money available under Senate amendment for rebate to members of investor-owned health plans, 2008
10-year savings to enrollees in investor-owned insurers from Senate amendment’s minimum medical loss ratio
Rough estimate of money available for rebate from all health insurers, assuming national medical loss ratio of 90 percent and enrollment-weighted average
average medical loss ratio for investor-owned insurers, 199318
Percentage difference between 1993 and 2007 medical loss ratios of investor-owned insurers
Dollar difference between 1993 and 2007 medical loss ratios of investor-owned insurers based on 2008 premium revenues
5
Endnotes
1 PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml. 2 Health Care for america now, “net Income of Major U.s. Health Insurers, 2000 – 2008 (in millions),” 2009. accessed at http:// healthcareforamericanow.org/page/-/documents for download/090728 net Income of Major Health Insurers 2000-2008 - Final-1.pdf. 3 government accountability Office, “Private Health Insurance: 2008 survey results on number and Market share ofCarriers in the small group Health Insurance Market,” Febuary 27, 2009. accessed at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09363r.pdf. 4 shaya Tayefe Mohajer, “state didn’t try to collect fine from Blue CrossHealth care enforcers admit they knew they’d be outgunned in court,” associated Press, July 4, 2008. accessed at http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/04/BUsB11JV3B.DTl. 5 Wellpoint, “10-K statement ending December 31, 2008,” 2009. accessed at http://ir.wellpoint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=130104&p=irol-seCText&T eXT=aHr0cDovl2njym4uMTBrd2l6yXJklmnvbs94bWwvZmlsaW5nlnhtbD9yZXBvPXrlbmsmaXBhZ2U9nje1Mzc0MyZhdHrhy2g9T04mc1h CUkw9MQ%3d%3d. 6 7
The medical loss ratios are based on premium figures from fully insured covered lives.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml; Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line—and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/theinsurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html
8 9
Families Usa, “Medical loss ratios: evidence from the states” June 2008. accessed at http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/medical-loss-ratio.pdf. Center for Medicare and Medicaid services Congressional record. accessed at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r111:29:./temp/~r111UWhue5:e140480.
10 11
Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line -- and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/the-insurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html.
12
neeraj sood, neeraj, arkadipta ghosh, and José J. escarce (2009). “employer-sponsored Insurance, Health Care Cost growth, and the economic Performance of U.s. Industries” Health research services. Online: http://www.hsr.org/hsr/abstract.jsp?aid=594371976.
13 Figures in the chart are based on an 81% medical loss ratio for the largest investor owned insurers. Together the insurers cover more than 100 million people, or 50 percent of those insured by private insurers. The amount available for a rebate is calculated using 50 percent of the amount spent nationally on private insurance premiums. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, “national Health expenditure Projections 20082018.” accessed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/nationalHealthexpendData/downloads/proj2008.pdf. 14 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services, “national Health expenditure Projections 2008-2018.” accessed at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ nationalHealthexpendData/downloads/proj2008.pdf. 15
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml.
16 Wendell Potter,”The Insurance Industry’s lethal Bottom line -- and sen. al Franken’s solution,” Huffington Post, December 6, 2009. accessed at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/the-insurance-industrys-l_b_382001.html. 17 University’s John F. Kennedy school of government,”Health Care Delivery Covered lives – summary of Findings,” The Health Care Delivery Policy Program, 2008. accessed at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/hcdp/numbers/Covered lives summary.pdf. 18
PricewaterhouseCoopers, “Beyond the sound bite: review of presidential candidates’ proposals for health reform,” 2008. accessed at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/popups/medical-loss-ratio.jhtml.
6
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Data for Largest Health Insurers in Selected States, 2008*
Revenue from Premiums (in millions of dollars)** Medical Loss Ratio 83.0% 83.6% 83.6% 88.1% 82.0% 83.6% 84.0% 83.6% 87.4% 83.6% 82.0% 83.6% 85.1% 83.6% $9,687 $10,079 $47,736 $3,126 $10,563 $2,707 $8,873 87.9% 88.3% 83.6% 86.6% 84.0% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 1.9% 8.0% 6.4% 6.0% 6.4% 2.6% 6.4% 8.0% 6.4% 4.9% 6.4% 2.1% 1.7% 6.4% 3.4% 6.0% 90% 6.4% 90% 6.4% 90% 7.0% Senate Proposed Minimum MLR Percent Difference $1,071 $57,101 $57,101 $6,320 $73,608 $57,101 $2,115 $57,101 $9,880 $57,101 $73,608 $57,101 $12,590 $57,101 $11,020 $11,414 $57,101 $10,714 $47,736 $47,736 $60,359 $47,736 $8,640 $47,736 $1,777 $47,736 $60,359 $5,568 $47,736 $47,736 $889 Medical Costs (in millions of dollars) Total Available for Rebates to Members $75,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $120,000,000 $5,889,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $127,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $252,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $5,889,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $617,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $231 ,000,000 $194 ,000,000 $3,654,000,000 $106,000,000 $634,000,000
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
State
Insurer
arkansas
BCBS aR
Californiat
Wellpoint
Connecticutt
Wellpoint
Delawaret
CareFirst BCBS
Floridat
UnitedHealth
Indianat
WellPoint
Louisiana
BCBS La
Mainet
WellPoint
Michigan
BCBS MI
Missourit
WellPoint
Nevadat
UnitedHealth
New Hampshiret
WellPoint
North Carolina
BCBS NC
Ohiot
WellPoint
Pennsylvania
Highmark BlueCross Blue Shield
Pennsylvania
Independence BlueCross
Virginiat
WellPoint
Washingtont
Premera
West Virginiat
Coventry
7
* all work is based upon the best publicly available data on premium revenues and medical claims costs. **Data from National association of Insurance Commissioners and company filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ending Dec. 31, 2008. Premium figures are for fully insured covered lives. t The largest insurer in this state is a multi-state insurer. all figures include data from all states where the company operates.
8
Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Data for Largest Investor-Owned Multi-State Commercial Health Insurers, 2008*
Medical Loss Ratio Covered Lives (in thousands) Risk-Based $20,788 $60,359 $7,253 $47,736 $8,873 $23,714 $10,769 $179,492 83.1% 90% 6.9% 50,059 86.9% 90% 3.1% 2,864 84.5% 90% 5.5% 8,218 2,870 856 58,938 84.0% 90% 6.0% 2,910 1,718 83.6% 90% 6.4% 16,529 18,520 81.9% 90% 8.1% 3,583 8,096 11,679 35,049 4,628 11,088 3,720 108,997 82.0% 90% 8.0% 10,360 15,985 26,345 81.5% 90% 8.5% 5,595 10,893 16,488 Fee-Based Total $2,168,100,000 $5,888,600,000 $717,300,000 $3,654,500,000 $633,800,000 $1,543,500,000 $384,200,000 $14,990,000,000 Senate Proposed Minimum MLR Percent Difference Money Available for Rebate to Members
Revenue from Medical Costs Premiums (in (in millions of millions of dollars)* dollars)
aetna
$25,507
UnitedHealth Group $8,856 $57,101
$73,608
Cigna
Wellpoint
Coventry
$10,563
Humana
$28,064
Healthnet
$12,392
Total Premiums and Volume-Weighted average MLR
$216,091
* Total medical premiums from company SEC filings for the year ending Dec. 31, 2008. Premiums are for fully insured covered lives. ** Estimated value of rebates for fully insured enrollees. Does not include administrative-service-only customers.
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
Medical Benefit Ratios of Private Insurers, Public Medicare Plan, 1993–2007
Percentage of federal Medicare benefit outlays spent on medical care compared with percentage of premium revenue spent on medical care by investor-owned private insurance companies
100%
96
95% ▼
Medicare
97.9%
94 92 90 88 86 84 82 80
Investor-Owned Insurers
81%* ▼
’93 ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 ’07
*Estimated Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute, U.S. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services
MaIN STREET aLLIaNCE
▼
9
97.7% 98 ▼
