Georgia State Legislator Claims Anthony Tricoli Was Scapegoat for University System's Inefficiencies

Published on June 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 34 | Comments: 0 | Views: 418
of 16
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Tricoli is the USG's Scapegoat

Comments

Content

State legislator claims Tricoli was
scapegoat
Posted: December 4, 2012 at 4:18 pm
Updated: December 13, 2012 at 11:09 am
By David Schick
State Rep. Karla Drenner thinks that more blame for GPC‟s budget deficit should be placed with the
University System of Georgia than with former President Anthony Tricoli.
Drenner recently stated in a CrossRoadsNews article that she believed Tricoli wasn‟t at fault and that he
was just a scapegoat for the USG.
“How can a president with a long series of successes be abruptly dismissed before any investigation?”
wrote Drenner in response to follow up questions the Collegian submitted via email.
In the response, Drenner analyzes and questions the USG‟s Special Audit of GPC‟s budget deficit.
“I also started to wonder about the USG involvement and learned that they meet annually with the
college‟s leadership teams to review the college‟s budget actions of the precious year and discuss their
future budget proposal,” wrote Drenner. “If they were meeting annually, how could the Chancellors office
not know?”
Drenner stated that if they didn‟t know, they should have known. Drenner stated that the changes to USG
budget oversight procedures, which were adopted on June 5 according to an email by Chancellor Hank
Huckaby, are an indication of the USG‟s culpability.
“Clearly, the financial oversight processes and procedures which were in place at the System Office were
inadequate,” wrote Drenner.
“While ultimately it is the college president‟s responsibility to manage the organization, again I would
offer with the adoption of these changes does it not communicate the recognition of the lack of
appropriate processes and procedures by the University System that added to this problem?”

According to USG‟s Special Audit, “email discussions among GPC‟s financial staff starting in Jan 2012 that
reference the declines in the auxiliary fund balances”were not shared outside GPC‟s Office of Financial
and Administrative Affairs until “several months afterwards.”
Drenner noted that the Tricoli was specifically excluded from these communications.
“I am particularly concerned that the USG‟s special audit report failed to communicate that „system level‟
leaders had been involved in these e-mail discussions which excluded the president,” wrote Drenner.
In her last point, Drenner makes reference to the special audit‟s claim that all of GPC‟s budget
presentations were “incomplete and inaccurate.”
Drenner wrote:
Again, I ask myself, if the president was receiving ‘incomplete’ and ‘inaccurate’ budget presentations
from the second person in authority at the college and the top financial administrator with 40 years of
experience, the CBO, why was the president removed? Only too recently the Board at the University of
Virginia removed the President of the UVA. The president after the investigation was restored to her
leadership position. Consider the recent events at Emory when upper level administrators purposefully
misled the public for years regarding its successes. An investigation was done, and when it concluded
that the Emory’s president did not know, the president was retained, and the individuals responsible
not.
Drenner concluded that she understood how difficult it could be to reverse the decision of removing
Tricoli, but the evidence from the special audit “suggests thoughtful reconsideration.”
The Collegian emailed Chancellor Huckaby requesting a response to Drenner‟s statements.
As of press time, there has been no response.
Representative Drenner’s Comments:
In the court of law the presumption of innocence is the principle that one is considered innocent until
proven guilty. It stands to reason that the prosecution or in this instance that the University System of
Georgia has to collect and present compelling evidence to support the allegation of “fiscal
mismanagement” that subsequently supported the termination of GPC‟S President. Of course, I
realize that Georgia is right to work State and the legal metaphor that I use is not applicable. But the
larger question for me in this situation is how can someone be removed, not rehired, terminated or
any of the above without first obtaining the facts??? Effective June 30th the GPC‟s President‟s contract
was not renewed and the USG formal audit was not released until 11 weeks later on September 17th,
2012.
Below are my responses to your questions:

1) Why do you believe Anthony Tricoli wasn't at fault for the Georgia Perimeter College
budget deficit?
Several statements made in the final audit report suggest the problem was not solely at the
presidential level. Other departments suggested to be involved were the Human Resource and Budget
Offices. “A significant inaccuracy regarding personal services was budgeting of fringe
benefits. GPC understated the fringe benefits that corresponded with each employee
on the payroll. This understatement has been estimated at $6.7 million. Understating
fringe benefits allowed other budget areas to be overstated. When funds were spent
against the overstated areas, deficit spending occurred.”(page 14)
Does this mean the college‟s Office of Human Resources made mistakes in assigning employees to the
appropriate departments? From what I understand, both the Human Resources Department
reported to the same vice president as did the Budget Office. Thus, the problems regarding the
budget are centralized in this one area under this one vice president (CBO).
Presidents in all organizations are ultimately responsible for the organizations in which they have
been charged to run but, presidents must rely upon their staff to provide them with accurate
information, so the best decisions can be made in a timely fashion. On this point, the special audit
reported the following: “It is clear from our review that GPC‟s CBO did not provide GPC‟s
President with timely and reliable financial information for the President‟s use in
managing the institution.”(page 3)
The special audit report indicates the following about the role the college‟s budget manager played in
the college‟s budget problems: “Meanwhile, the former budget director stated that he knew
of no one who was looking at the overall budget. It seems apparent that he should
have had the responsibility for doing so since his job description included
responsibility for budget planning, development and monitoring in accordance with
institutional and system requirements. He indicated he had conversations with the
former CBO and the former AVP to notify them they were overspending, but no
actions were ever taken to curtail the spending. (We did not find documented evidence
to support the existence of the conversations referenced by the former budget

director.)”(page 19-20)
When the former budget manager was questioned by an attorney about his role in this situation, he
responded by sending a signed Affidavit. This Affidavit was noted in the special audit review: “He
[budget manager] also stated in an affidavit signed for former President Tricoli that
he did not believe there were any budget deficits and that he never brought concerns
about budget deficits to the attention of the former President.”(page 20).
Again, I began to wonder how the President did not know about this budget issue.
The special audit answered my question in this way: “The former Budget Director‟s job
description states that he is responsible for “budget planning, development and
monitoring in accordance with institutional and System requirements. As noted
throughout this report, fundamental budget duties were not performed. Budget
reporting was inaccurate, budgets were not correctly loaded into the financial
system, numerous individuals could override the flawed budgets that were loaded in
the system, and budget development essentially ignored actual financial experience.
In short, essentially every primary duty of the Budget Director was left
unfulfilled.”(page 5 ) This finding alone suggested to me a system flaw.
I began to think about the annual budget reports and the creation of those reports what role did they
play in the budget problem at GPC. The Special Audit stated, “We found three such
presentations for FY 10, 11, and 12 and noted that presentations were not
representative of GPC‟s financial condition.” (page 19) So, from this information I now knew
that the budget information received by the college president was inaccurate.
At this point, I also started to wonder about the USG involvement and learned that they meet
annually with the college‟s leadership teams to review the college‟s budget actions of the previous year
and discuss their future budget proposal.
So, if they were meeting annually, how could the Chancellors office not know?? Well, either they knew
or they should have known? If they did know then how come from 2010-2012 the systems office did
not discuss the looming financial concerns with GPC and make adjustments back in 2010? I could
find no evidence in the final report that there was a discussion from the Interim President and the

current GPC President? Why?

2) Do you have any evidence that the University System used Tricoli as a scapegoat?
The USG Chancellor shortly after the departure of the President of GPC, adopted changes to the
processes and procedures within his office and other USG departments to strengthen budget
oversight in the future, suggesting that perhaps GPC may not have experienced the financial crises
which resulted. Clearly, the financial oversight processes and procedures which were in place at the
System Office were inadequate. They were so insufficient that they prevented the USG from providing
appropriate review and guidance of the budgets for the institutions in the System, including GPC. In
a June 5, 2012 letter to the University System Presidents, Chancellor Huckaby said the following:
“Effective oversight of fiscal operations is a shared responsibility among our presidents, our
chief business officers, and the University System Office.” “In an effort to strengthen our
fiscal operations, the System Office will be implementing enhanced review of each
institution‟s financials. Accordingly, I am implementing the following procedures. These
procedures will be formalized shortly; however, please implement these at your respective
institutions as follows:”
The communication follows with great detail about how each of these areas listed below will be
carried out in the future: 1) Budget Hearings; 2) Quarterly Financial Reports; 3) External Audits; 4)
Use of Reserves; and 5) Institution Visits.
While ultimately it is the college president‟s responsibility to manage the organization, again I would
offer with the adoption of these changes does it not communicate the recognition of the lack of
appropriate processes and procedures by the University System that added to this problem?

3) If Tricoli wasn't at fault, do you know of any specific person(s) that was in a position
to prevent the budget deficit?
The special audit acknowledges the following: “We also noted the existence of email
discussions among staff within GPC‟s Office of Financial and Administrative Affairs
starting in January 2012 that reference declines in auxiliary fund balances and the

use of auxiliary reserves for non-auxiliary expenditures over the past several fiscal
years. There was no evidence that these emails were shared outside of the Office of
Financial and Administrative Affairs until several months afterwards.” (page 1) While
this information is disturbing, I am particularly concerned that the USG‟s special audit report failed to
communicate that “system level” leaders had been involved in these e-mail discussions which
excluded the college president.

4) Do you have any other knowledge regarding Georgia Perimeter College's budget
deficit or the removal of Tricoli? (Beyond what has already been published in the press
or the special audit review)
During my tenure in the Georgia State Legislature thousands of my constituents have been and/or are
currently connected to GPC, and there‟s an overall dissatisfaction with what has happened at the
college as a result of the Chancellor‟s and BOR‟s decisions. We all have the same question: how can a
president with a long series of successes be abruptly dismissed before any investigation?

5) What do you think are the necessary steps to ensure this doesn't happen to another
University System school?
Allow me to first share that I am saddened that so many college employees were harmed as a result of
this situation. This problem appears to have occurred because of a lack of communication as well as a
lack of a strong oversight guidelines at the University System level, as evidenced by new and more
comprehensive System Budget Oversight Process.
As I conclude my responses, I want to share one last point made by those who conducted and
prepared the special audit report: “GPC‟s former fiscal leadership team relied on
inaccurate, internally generated spreadsheets that did not correspond to the General
Ledger. Specifically, it appears that members of GPC‟s cabinet, to include the former
President, and both the President‟s Council and the Strategic Budget Committee, were
provided incomplete and inaccurate budget presentations made by the CBO and the
Budget Director at various group meetings.”(page 6)

Again, I ask myself, if the president was receiving “incomplete” and “inaccurate” budget presentations
from the second person in authority at the college and the top financial administrator with 40 years of
experience, the CBO, why was the president removed?
Only too recently the Board at the University of Virginia removed the President of the UVA. The
president after the investigation was restored to her leadership position. Consider the recent events at
Emory when upper level administrators purposefully misled the public for years regarding its
successes. An investigation was done, and when it concluded that the Emory‟s president did not
know, the president was retained, and the individuals responsible not. I understand how difficult it
can be for a decision to be reversed. As is evidenced by the internal findings of the USG‟s Special
Audit and the implementation of an extensive new budget review process by the USG suggests
thoughtful reconsideration.

UPDATE (12/13/12): Representative Drenner‟s full comments were made available at the time this
story was posted in the link entitled “Drenner in response.” However, you can read them by clicking the
previous link or by clicking here.

1.
PRESIDENT TRICOLI NEEDED NOW MORE THAN EVERReply
January 2, 2013 at 2:22 pm

Have you ever worked at a place where everything was going so well, then one person leaves and
everything seemes to change for the worse overnight? Well if you had worked at GPC pre and then
post Dr. Tricoli, you would know exactly what I‟m talking about.
The faculty member with 25+ years of experience who posted comments before me hit the nail on
the head. This person is my campus colleague, however we are in different departments. Over the
Holiday Break he showed me the budget reports he mentioned in his posting, and what I‟m now
left wondering is why Dr. Tricoli was removed from his position at all. It is clear from reading
these budget reports he was lied to by the very people he should have been able to trust the most.
I agree with previous posters, the loss of Dr. Tricoli was a horrible injustice, but not just to Dr.
Tricoli. It was/is a horrible injustice to the entire college community we know as GPC. His loss is
one which appears we will not shake for a very long time, if at all. This man (Dr. Tricoli) is not
only a cutting edge president, he is the one who breathed life back into our college after a decage
of neglict and nothingness. The students admired him for his open and accessible style, as did

many of us faculty members. I admire Dr. Tricoli because he was a man of his word from the day
he started at GPC 6 years ago.
As a 19 year faculty member at GPC, I am very sad the Regents made this very hasty decision
based upon receipt of just a very small portion of the information – incorrect information at that!
And while the rest of the story has only recenty been told, I fear we‟re still not likely to experience
the type of change the USG leaders should have already made.
Legislative Representative Drenner said it best, it is difficult for the Chancelor to admit he was
wrong. But the truth now is known, Tricoli did nothing wrong, and the USG should do the right
thing and bring him back. I ask the Chancellor and Board to drop their egos and do the right
thing.
My colleagues and I want to thank Representative Drenner for uncovering this injustice. Its‟ too
bad she can‟t force the System and Board to do the right thing for GPC. Because of the ego‟s on
the Board and at the System Office, we will all suffer for a very very long time.

2.
Tricoli Received Inaccurate DataReply
December 21, 2012 at 2:36 pm

The headlines from an article printed in The Champion News indicates Dr. Tricoli received
inaccurate data. He received this inaccurate data from the Budget Manager AND the Executive
Vice President.
It is unimaginable that both of these men couldn‟t get the budget right! What the world were they
doing five days a week?
As a veteran of 25+ years on the faculty at GPC, and as a member of the Strategic Planning Budget
Committee, I am appauled that those two budget guys lied to us and to the college president. Who
could have known they were not trustworthy? Their presentations and data were always made to
appear accurate. Their answers to our questions we now understand were all lies. These indiviuals
destroyed so much at GPC. It is inconceivable to me that their actions were not unlawful.
By removing the president of the college, and not the budget leaders until much later, the actions
of the University System are are not only questionable but highly suspect that something much
larger was at stake.
I have gone back through all of my Strategic Planning Budget Committee notes, and I have copied
and shared the PowerPoint information with several of you, and we have all said the same thing.
Tricoli was definitely misled and lied to. We were all misled by the Chief Budget Officer of the
college. We were all given false information every time this committee met.
So many people lost their jobs, and we lost an outstanding college president. I have worked
through three permanent presidents and two interim presidents here at GPC, and frankly none of
them hold a candle when comparing their work to the work Dr. Tricoli produced. I am frankly
disgusted that he was not brought back after the USG‟s audit findings were released. I have

communicated my disgust with my elected officials, and I hope they too will take the same action
that Representative Drenner took.
I appreciate Representative Drenner for her willingness to answer tough questions on the record,
and for telling us about the weaknesses she discovered with the USG‟s oversight budget review
process.
I, along with many others, believe President Tricoli was silenced so the weaknesses of the
University System would not be shown the light of day. Now that Representative Drenner has
brought the USG‟s weaknesses out into the open, perhaps the BOR will do the right thing and
bring Tricoli back to GPC.
Thank you Representative Karla Drenner.

3.
Tricoli Should be PresidentReply
December 18, 2012 at 1:09 pm

The BOR and USG Chancellor should reconsider their actions. Tricoli was a very responsible
leader. The USG Audit Report concludes the EVP and the Budget Manager lied to him. He should
get his job back.

4.
Kudos for Rep. DrennerReply
December 14, 2012 at 12:35 pm

Hats off to Representative Drenner for her efforts to “do what is right.” Replace the name “Tricoli”
with Jones or Smith; it doesn‟t matter who it is; if this happened to anyone, it is unfair. I am glad
that we have at least one representative in Georgia who will stand up and do what‟s right. And I‟m
glad that David Schick and The Collegian are reporting.

5.
Good Guy Tricoli, Bad Guy USGReply
December 13, 2012 at 3:03 pm

First, thank you representative drenner. You have a lot of guts taking on the university system.
And by everyting you said, you are already 20 miles ahead of them. As a student, I can say you did
your homework.
Wheren is the justice in all of this? The system screwed up not the president. So why wasn‟t the
chancellor removed? What was the board thinking? Was the board thinking at all? Apparently

not! The system knew about the budget overun and did‟t tell the college president.
Hello…..anybody home? Why did the system auditors exclude the facts from being included in
their report? That must be illegal. Can we do something about this?

6.
Students Against the Rush to JudgementReply
December 13, 2012 at 2:47 pm

As a student leader at GPC, I am sickened by what happened to our college and our college
president. Dr. T is one of my mentors. He is a man to whom I look for guidance and direction. On
several occasions he met with us student leaders while sitting around the fireplace in his home.
He talked about this very issue “Rush to Judgement.” He told us to gather all of the facts before
making a decision, and certainly before speaking out. It seems to me, the Chancellor and Board
could have benefited from sitting is his living room around the fireplace.
We, the student leaders at GPC support Dr. T. Thank you Rep Drenner for helping students and
for teaching us its OK to stand up to bullies.

7.
KUDOS to Rep. Drenner!!Reply
December 13, 2012 at 2:35 pm

Representative Drenner, thanks so much for what you‟ve done to uncover the truth.
The campuses have been in a state of shock for months, not knowing what really happened. Your
comments to the Collegian Editor have confirmed what many of us have suspected all along. I
work on the Newton Campus, and I cannot tell you how badly we want Dr. T back at GPC. Please
do continue to expose these wrongs and bring back our president. Thank you Representative
Drenner!

8.
Thanks to Representative DrennerReply
December 13, 2012 at 9:50 am

Thanks to State Representative Drenner for the time and thought she placed into her
investigation. She has raised many questions that should concern anyone who believes “innocent
until proven guilty.”

9.

Karla DrennerReply
December 13, 2012 at 8:48 am

I don‟t normally read blogs nor have I ever responded to one. I was concerned that perhaps the
full extent of my comments were not included in the article and they were not. If the system
allows I have provided them below. I have no knowledge of the inner workings of the College and
did not weigh in on this issue lightly. I did so not because I like or don‟t like Dr. Tricoli, nor simply
to make a statement. I have had the priviledge of representing GPC Clarkston for 12 years and feel
like that I have a responsibility to say something about what happened.
After all, many of you are my consitutents and you deserve some sort of representation, even if
you agree or disagree with my assessment. Of course, it would have been easy to sit back and say
nothing, staying out of the fray and as long as I am a representative, I will listen and if necessary
will get involved.
Trust me when I say that I understand the fallout that ensues as a result of taking a stand. I hope
that all of you reading this will expect nothing less from your own Representative. I can be
reached at [email protected] or 678.232.1056 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 678.232.1056
end_of_the_skype_highlighting.
Representative Drenner‟s Comments

o
David SchickReply
December 13, 2012 at 10:43 am

Just for the record, I did include the “full extent” of your comments the moment I posted
this story. They were available via the second hyperlink in the article (“Drenner in
response”).
I did the same for your comment.

o
Rush to JudgementReply
December 13, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Representative Drenner, Thank you for your courage. Anyone reading this blog should
hope that if they are ever in a situation where people rush to judgement and they suffer
because of it that someone (like you) will stand up for them even if it may not be a
“popular” thing to do. I plan to contact my representative regarding this issue. Thanks for
your commitment to fairness.


Yes, this was a Rush to JudgementReply
December 13, 2012 at 3:10 pm

Representative Drenner has exposed the truth. Yes this certainly appears to have
been a rush to judgement. Can this decision be turned around?
Thanks for your good work Representative Drenner. I‟ll vote for you again!
Also, great job to the GPC Collegian Editor Schick. Great piece.

10.
Get your facts straightReply
December 11, 2012 at 1:03 pm

I have been a member of the GPC Faculty Association 282 for more than 20 years, and the
information you shared is incorrect and purposefully misleading, just like those comments from
“Observer”. Perhaps you two are one in the same?!
Last night, I pulled the org charts up from historical files I‟ve been collecting for many years, see
2006 when tricoli was hired GPC had 12 Associate VP‟s, when tricoli left in 2012 there were only 3
Associate VP‟s remaining. He also eliminated 5 Provost positions. Oh….you also forgot to mention
he added 100 new full-time faculty members to the college from 2009-2011. During our Faculty
Development Day in 2006, tricoli promised to reduce the number of assistant and associate vice
presidents. He kept his promise and then some. He did a great job as our college president, give
the man his due. He moved us out of the dark ages, to a college of national prominence.
He also saved “Observer‟s” job when the Lawrenceville Campus closed in 2007. Read the audit
report, the Budget Director and the EVP messed up the college budget and lied to tricoli and all of
us. I agree, tricoli was the fall guy.
Stop being a hater and acknowledge the facts, instead of making them up as you go along. Tricoli
did a great job at GPC.

11.
JQReply
December 11, 2012 at 12:41 pm

Response to Observer (RJ), I worked closely with Dr. Tricoli for more than half of his years at
GPC, and I can say with absolute certainty that your statements are untrue. Dr. Tricoli is a highly
ethical person and leader to the core of who he is. You obviously didn‟t know him at all.

As for the Whistleblower case, that is about the theft of a student‟s laptop by another student; and
Dr. Tricoli was not involved in that case at any level. Read the Report. The other case filed by this
same person is hocus pocus, that‟s why the BOR has moved for this case to be dismissed. Read the
past Collegian article on this topic.
Mr. Observer get your facts straight, and read the first email in this thread, you are tight roping
liable language.

o
ObserverReply
December 12, 2012 at 8:09 am

JQ, you have no idea what you are talking about and no knowledge of the facts.


Observe this.......ObserverReply
December 13, 2012 at 2:26 pm

Read the comments all around you Observer. It is you who knows neither truth,
nor facts. You cannot see the truth, for your head is in the clouds.


ObserverReply
December 14, 2012 at 8:29 am

Popular opinion as a measure of truthfulness and factuality? Yeah, you
go with that…


Get a life Observer
December 18, 2012 at 1:56 pm

Observer (aka: 6‟4″ frame – tall, light and stupid), you are a fools
fool. You wouldn‟t know fact from fiction. All of those years in
the WI and you still can‟t write…..or think. Not all of us ladies are
in the palm of your hand, you just think we are.


Observer
January 2, 2013 at 2:58 pm

In response to “Get a life…” Wrong. You have no idea who you
are talking to… guess again.

12.
Charter Member of the GPC 282Reply
December 10, 2012 at 5:01 pm

with respect to Rep Drenner
I lost my job due to rampant fiscal mismanagement. a great deal of which stemmed from the over
hiring and increase in upper middle management which when on during Tricoli‟s time at GPC.
regardless of the level, if any, of Tricoli‟s complicity, he WAS the man in charge and was tasked
with proper stewardship of the institution. in short, regardless if he did it or not, as the President
he was responsible

13.
Charter Member of the GPC 282Reply
December 10, 2012 at 4:52 pm

Rep Jenner is a fan of Dr. Tricoli, so her stance is not exactly a surprise.
Tricoli will never assume the Presidency here again. deal with it.

14.
ObserverReply
December 10, 2012 at 10:30 am

Dr. T certainly did some good things at GPC. Perhaps he had no role in the budget fiasco.
However, he was not without fault and acted unethically and unscrupulously on many occasions. I
suggest you look at the “Whistleblower” story and read the Plaintiff‟s Response at the bottom of
the article.

15.

ChristieReply
December 7, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Finally….the facts!
First, thank you to our legislator Karla Drenner for having the guts to say in public what we‟ve all
been saying behind our closed dorrs.
What the H – - – was Chancellor Huckaby thinking! He removed the college president before he
knew the facts. Dr. T should be brought back immediately (if he even wants the job).
I hope Representative Drenner will push this all the way to the end. There‟s no way the university
system should be able to get away with their sneaky, unprofessional and fact-bending behaviors.
And what about the head auditor guy at the USG, he kept all of us from knowing the truth too. He
said email communications were found, but he failed to tell us system staff were writing those
emails. This is shameful. The USG‟s actions are unscrupulous, they‟ve been lying to all of us for 8
months about Dr. T‟s involvement in the mess at GPC.
Dr. T was a great president, he saved many of our jobs, and he deserves our support. What a
shame the university system office has done this to such a wonderful man. I am just sick about all
of it. I have worked here for over 20 years, and I never expected something like this to happen at
GPC. Our president deserves his job back.
Thank you Representative Karla Drenner for all that you did to expose the facts. I hope you make
them pay for their unlawful acts.

16.
justusReply
December 7, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Representative Drenner is a highly ethical leader. I am so happy she conducted this research and
has shared her findings with us. Many of us believed Dr. Tricoli was the fall guy, and now we
know its true. Our college has not been the same since he left. I sincerely hope this means he will
be back in His office soon. We desparately need his leadership. Thank you Rep. Drenner for not
being afraid to communicate the truth!

17.
chapple chandlerReply
December 7, 2012 at 6:48 am

Many thanks to Rep. Drenner for looking into this.

18.

Tread CarefullyReply
December 5, 2012 at 1:51 pm

Comment to potential posters: Be aware before you post. States are allowing the identity of
bloggers to be revealed in lawsuits if individuals believe they have been libeled. Tread carefully.

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close