How to file a T1
Content
ForcedtoFile
PROPER WAY TO FILE A Canada Revenue Agency T1 Personal 'RETURN OF INCOME' When You Have A Demand To File By CRA, Or You Wish To Pay Your 'Fair Share', But No More - Which Should Be $0.00 Specific Filing Method for IRS 1040 at bottom of page. ©DetaxCanada ®
Last Edited March 27, 2011 Links fixed 'Contract of Servitude' concept no longer taught here. 'It's PROPERTY RIGHT'. Income Tax is the 'harvesting' of the fruits of the labour of 'owned slaves'.
Before we proceed on how to file a T1 'return of income', [or, IRS 1040], I would suggest that you download and study the Name Game Blog. In it, you will find that you have been entrapped into the income tax scam by Government's devious misuse, and maluse of the Unalienable Property Right. And, those who are teaching you that income tax is a contract issue, and that there are remedies through contract and commercial law, and through the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), are deceiving you BIG TIME. Slave? How did the Government make you a slave? Download and Read the The Name Game [in RTF format]. We need some details on what the process is all about. I have repeated many points, so that you will be reading this valuable information more than once - then, just maybe, some will stick in your 'gray matter'. Lord Blackstone, in his Commentaries of the late 1600's extended the great deception that all free will men and women are one and the same http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
as 'natural persons' by his definitions of 'natural' and 'artificial' persons, a scam which had begun in earnest in England around about 1300 AD. Yes, a 'natural person' is an appellation applied to a living man or woman, however, the status of that man or woman is that of a 'fiction' plantation slave status, and for purposes of fraud. All 'persons' are 'legal fictions'. Artificial persons are ships, or make-believe ships 'at sea' - bodies corporate or politic. A 'natural person' is a slave status imposed upon a human body, thus supposedly making the fiction a natural thing - but it is still a fiction make-believe. It is imposed upon you by a deceptive 'legal identity' created by the Crown in right of your birth Province, or by your birth State in the USA. You can recognize this 'legal identity' by the fact that your 'family name' or 'surname' is the primary name, and your given names, or the initials of those names, is for reference only. This is the name you find on your birth certificate. By using this name as your own name, you are entrapped into the legal make-believe world by the assumption that you and the legal identity are 'one and the same'. This scam is not by contract, but by your supposed violation of the Crown's or State's property right. One of the maxims of law out of the property right is 'accessio cedit principali' - an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal. The principal is the 'legal identity name', intellectual property claimed as being owned by the Crown or State. By your, as an adult man (male or female), supposedly voluntary use of that name, you are attaching yourself as an accessory to Crown or State property. That makes you property of the Crown or State, and, an adult man who is property is a SLAVE. Your parents gave their 'plantation slave' [birth certificate] names when completing the form for your Provincial, or for your State registry of live birth. The Crown in right of the Province, or the State, then http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
'assumed' custody of that 'child of slaves' under the Child Custody Act [or similarly named act] as any slave owner claims the child of owned slaves. The parents become only 'foster parents' to the child. The birth certificate is a 'chattel bond', or more correctly, a 'warehouse receipt', a trade name, and a number [SIN# or SSN#] imposed upon the 'registered' child slave - a physical immature human body. However, upon that child reaching the age of majority [usually age 21], that claim by government ceases, as a new scheme to entrap you into servitude must be made with the free will mind now recognized within that former child's body and brain. The 'captain, [your mature free will mind], of your 'earthen vessel', [your physical body], comes on board with a claim of right and assumes command. So, by deception and fraud, the servitude status is then assumed to exist by government by having you accept that you are 'one and the same' as the birth certificate name. As a mature free will man or woman, you are one 'without name and number'. No official public record shows that you have 'accepted' any name, and you have no labels on your body. The name on the Statement of Birth is that of the 'child' you were before you were recognized by society as having a free will mind. The Birth Certificate name is that of a 'legal identity', fiction name created and owned by the Province or State of your birth. Neither of these is your 'real name'. You ONLY have 'commonly known as' names for the remainder of your adult life. You DO NOT have 'also known as' names. That term refers to alternate names for the legal identity name. The Point: The Birth certificate name, however spelled, or in whatever case letters, is a name which belongs to the Crown or State, and imposes a 'plantation slave name or status' upon its user. The Statement of Birth name, however spelled, is the name of a 'child held in custody as a future slave'. So, using either name 'as your own name' will get you into trouble if http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
you use it in any government related forms, correspondence or forum. After age of majority, whatever name you use must indicate that it is only a 'commonly known as' and/or 'appelation' term/sound to which you will usually respond. Dad, Mom, Grandpa, Grandma, Hey You, Hey Dude, Woof or Meow work for most people. The primary remedy, relative to any Government forms or documents, is in the signature, and if more is needed, a claim of necessity in usage of the Crown or State owned name. By using 'for' or 'per' prior to signing any document, you alter the meaning of the signature to show that the party with the pen is not the party named or referred to in the document. And, if you find yourself in a court situation, you will need to file a claim that you only use the legal identity name under private necessity so as to curtail any assumptions that you are voluntarily attached to it. And, discovery can be requested to have the court show proof that you are one and the same as, or attached to the Crown or State property, and if they consider you of slave status, (which they do), then a demand for the authority, means and date that the Crown or State declared you to be of slave status. A secondary way that the Crown reinforces its claim upon you is by a contract of servitude - a feudal contract. This contract can be actual, as in joining the military; or, by assumpsit, where you obey a statute which only applies to a legal identity-fiction/person, and especially when you acknowledge the birth certificate name in a court hearing as being one and the same as yourself. However, this is not the method used to entrap you into being liable for the income tax. The 'real' you (while a child) were considered to be 'physical property', and thus had 'given' or baptismal names, and your 'family' name is for reference only. But, it must also be kept in mind that there is no record of your having accepted those 'given names', nor could you have as a child. To anyone else, they are only 'a commonly called names' or pseudonym nicknames, but,they are not your name. You have 'no name or number'. No adult man (male or female) has a name. You are a mind http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
functioning within a human physical body. A mind is a function and not a thing, and thus cannot be named, seen, photographed, DNA'd, fingerprinted, retina identified, nor any other physical means of being identified. There is no proof that any registered names are your names. Remember, we see no 'family' name for Jesus (Yehsuah) in the Bible. As with the custom of the time, He would have been referred to as Yehsuah ben (son of) Joseph, or Yehsuah of Nazareth. The European people have usually adopted 'a son of', a trade name, or a place name which eventually became a family name. The Historical Research Center, England It was not until the middle ages that surnames were first introduced to distinguish between people bearing the same personal name or Christian names. With the growth in documentation necessitated by the expanding administrations of medieval rulers who were eager to replenish their exchequers by improving their tax collection system, such surnames became essential. The reasoning behind this was that the Pope of Rome claimed ownership and authority over all mankind on planet Earth. In 1302, Pope Boniface VIII (c. 1235 - 1303) issued the papal bull Unum Sanctum, wherein the Pope says: "Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff." Other Papal Bulls of that time period proclaim that the Pope has supreme and final authority in all matters, both civic and spiritual. [GOOGLE "Papal Bull 1455" and "Papal Bull 1493"] However, the Pope could not commandeer the fruits of a man's labour, that being a product of a man's mind, as our Creator endowed us with a free will mind. And, you need to understand that this was the Pope, Boniface VIII, who conspired with Edward I, King of England to defraud and deprive the English people of their Anglo-Saxon Common Law. Thus, with the Pope claiming ownership of everything under, on and above the ground and the sea, the people had nothing to use to pay the http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Pope the demanded 'tribute' - taxes/bribe' demanded by the Pope as Pontifex Maximus of the Holy Roman Empire. So, a scheme had to be developed to extract the labour, or the fruits of the labour of a free will man. This scheme finally developed into the legal fiction name, and slave status it imposed upon the associated man. What does this all mean? And, please note: Replace the demonstration names shown herein with those names associated with yourself. First, for you to give or say your name in a court proceeding constitutes 'hearsay', which is 'a fraud upon the court'. A judge may choose to not complain about the fraud; however, you have eliminated your credibility in that court proceeding, and the judge then may disregard any evidence you may present. The only credible name you can give to the court is 'I AM'. Second, if you give your family name as being part of your name, you have admitted that you, and the 'legal identity' are one and the same, and that you are responsible for any debts and statutory obligations of the 'legal identity'. When asked to identify yourself in court, you say: "I do not consent to be identified by any name, and specifically not (strawman name). I am here to speak for and as primary creditor of the debtor and fiction called (strawman/birth certificate name)." Further instructions on court procedures are available by e-mail request. Third, the Crown (or State in the USA) created and owns the 'legal identity'. As such it is liable for all debts arising from any statutory obligations imposed upon 'persons' - and all statutes are only applicable to 'persons' - legal fictions, men in servitude to a corporate entity, and 'legal identities'. Your response: "You have invoiced the wrong party. Please send your invoice to the person who created and is liable for the legal identity, (strawman/BC name), which, I believe is the Crown in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
right of (birth Province), or State of (your birth State). A quote from the now defunct BBCOA webpage explains why the government must use legal fictions attached to men and women, and address all legislation to 'persons': "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person (corporation), an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other 'persons'. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible - mankind in their natural state." The above quote was in relation to two court cases in the USA: I cannot vouch for the following quotes, as I have not researched them; however, since all legislation, at all levels of government, both in the USA and Canada, are specifically directed at 'persons, and not to 'free will men and women, they ring true. If they could have been directed at, or applicable to the latter, then, due to the requirements of statutes to be clear and easily understood, they would be written so as to include free will men and women. The term 'person' is not a 'short-cut' for reference to free will men and women. "That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 May Term 1796. "governments are bodies politic" - Penhallow vs. Doane's Administrators 3 U.S. 54, 113 (1795). Lord Blackstone stated that 'artificial persons' are 'bodies corporate' or 'bodies politic'. Ergo: 'bodies politic' are corporations - make-believe ships. Therefore, the only *thing* required to file a 'return of income' is 'all persons resident in Canada' - found in Section 2 (required to pay an http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
income tax) and Section 150 (required to file a return of income -T1) of the Income Tax act of Canada. And in the US Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 USC, one finds that in Section 6012. "Doesn't this mean ME?", you ask. Our Creator God didn't create 'legal entities', otherwise known as 'persons'. Similar quotes can be found in Title 26 USC - the IRS CODE. (Sub-title A Section 2 and 7700-definitions] So, following this reasoning, the 'legal identity/natural person/strawman' identified by your physical body, (thus, associated with your body for the fraudulent purposes of extorting your labour or the fruits of your labour), has, as its only source of income, the fee you choose to pay it for its services as your 'agent in commerce' in dealing in the counterfeit Canadian or Federal Reserve currency, and/or as 'trustee in trust' of your assets. There is NO 'other income' associated with the strawman. In official records, or court transcripts, that 'person' name must be in all cap letters, [the 'all caps' spelling designating the slave as chattel pledged as a debtor in bankruptcy. The 'all caps' spelling does not create the strawman legal name - it is the conversion of the family name to sur, or primary name.] Although, in the past, and occasionally now, it appears as the 'nom de guerre' (war name) format, with one's family name first. However, even if correspondence comes to you in proper noun format from a government agency, it is still in reference only to the 'person' (sometimes referred to as 'strawman') name, which judges attempt to associate with your physical body. Your silence to their addressing you as 'Mister (family name) is usually sufficient for them to make the association/assumption that your body is the 'legal identity' entity they have on their court papers Remember, when you use the expression 'I am', you refer to your mind, which exists within your body, your earth vessel. The 'strawman' does not apply to your mind, nor affect your mind, except where the government may control your body to the detriment of your mind. The 'person' - strawman - legal name - [usually spelled in 'all caps', but not http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
necessarily so], attached to your body by the Crown can be thought of as a piece of sewer pipe through which you must reach to either receive, pay out, bank or invest Canadian dollars (or US FRNs). In this so called bankrupt country with non-backed script debt money [counterfeit money - actually a form of Middle Ages 'ship's script', as we live under corporate rule, and corporations are 'make-believe ships at sea], the present status of Canada and Canadian money [and also of the USA] since the 1930s, a free will man or woman cannot carry on commerce or deal in script money within this bankrupt corporation. Therefore, you need to deal in commerce through an agent, which is the all caps strawman-person. Just check the name on your credit or bank cards, or government issued cards It is this 'strawman-person' who receives wages as corporate 'income'. As a free will man, your wages are not taxable. And by the Royal Edict (1870) of Queen Victoria, a man's wages cannot be 'attached' = garnisheed. This was/is called 'The Wages Attachment Abolition Act, 1870'. So, what one does is to make a claim of right upon assets in one's strawman's name and create, (in your own mind, if you wish - a third party has no right to see it) a simple contract of agency between yourself, the free will man and the strawman-person the Crown has attached to your body. [Royal Edict: Legislation originated by the Queen, not Parliament] You will be paying a fee for the strawman's agency services[as proof of a contract of agency]; but, that fee per year needs be less than the individual minimum exemption - has been around $9,000.00 for the last while in Canada. There may be other exemptions, such as spousal, dependents and age. What you collected through the agent-strawman minus the agent's fee is your tax free wages or exchange of property. That amount goes into a business expense form as 'other' business expense (deductions) from the agent's gross income. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
According to law dictionaries and style manuals, an all caps name is either an acronym, ie: RCMP; or, by internal use in a corporation [body politic] as indicating a "legal fiction" designated as being a 'debtor'. A man in the military is of a "servant status" by contract, and is NOT a free will man. However, in the latter instance, the man's name is usually 'last name, first and second name' - a 'nom de guerre'. Apparently, even that name format is now being written in all caps. More recent speculation has it that the all caps spelling of the legal identity name signifies a slave pledged as chattel in bankruptcy by the debtor slave master/owner. In any case, it is irrelevant to us in this filing method. The relevant point is the inclusion of the family name as being the paramount name, and the given names as reference names. Since the government is a legal fiction, it, and any corporation (legal fiction) it creates, cannot recognize you, the free will man, and so must deal with [make contract with] you through a legal fiction entity. And, because the government [the Crown in right of Canada, or of a Province, or by the State] created this fiction version of your given and inherited name, it claims it as intellectual property, and bestows the status of plantation slave on any human who ignorantly accepts the name as being one and the same as himself/herself. A point of interest for Canadians:- If the Crown in right of a Province creates the legal fiction supposedly attached to a baby's body by a false birth certificate name, and the creator owns its creation; and then the Crown in right of Canada attaches a number [Social Insurance Number] to that legal fiction - legal identity, indicating that the Federal Crown is co-owner of that legal fiction, would Section 125 of the BNA Act and the 1982 Confederation Act be applicable? That section says: "No lands or PROPERTY belonging to Canada or any Province shall be liable to taxation." The birth certificate, the name on the birth certificate, and the legal identity which that name represents are the PROPERTY of the Crown.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
I often hear from people wishing to 'claim their strawman'. One cannot 'claim' another's property, unless there you have a proven debt against the owner of the property you claim. Since the legal identity name and the associated Social Insurance Number (SIN# or SSN#) belongs to the Crown or State, you cannot claim it. Since the Crown (or State) created the 'strawman' and claims ownership, the Crown (or State) is responsible for all debts imposed by the Crown (or State) upon the 'strawman'. Because you are in possession of the all caps name 'strawman', which acts as your agent in commerce, you use it as necessary to convert your labour and skills into what currently passes for Canadian (or USA) money so that you can obtain the necessities and conveniences of life. You, the free will man do the work or labour for the corporate body [employer] but the pay goes to your "strawman". Your "strawman" also is your agent for banking. Check your credit or bank card to see what name is there. Regarding anything to do with holding your assets, the strawman is your 'trustee in trust'. So, you see, the "strawman" receives the "gross income", which is your wages or other remuneration for your work, services or investments. That 'gross income' is subject to revision by exemptions,expenses and deductions. Since you choose to pay the strawman the sum of $3,500.00 for a fee for services (use of the strawman name), that is the 'net' and 'taxable' income of the person/strawman - as all else collected belongs to you under equity claim, and you are NOT a 'taxpayer'. You, the free will man received nothing as "income" - You get 'exchange value'. So now, CRA demands that THOMAS ROBERT JONES file a "return of income" USA instructions further down the page. Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "person resident in Canada", and the Income Tax Act of Canada says "every person (natural or artificial) resident in Canada must file a return of income" (Section http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
150). CRA may use a proper spelling of the strawman's name in their dunning correspondence; however, for formal demands and for court summons, they must use the all caps spelling of the strawman name. All caps just designates a fictional entity as a 'debtor'. Your status: Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is your "agent in commerce", you, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family are the 'scribe' for the legal fiction/entity, THOMAS ROBERT JONES. Now, getting to the T1 return. THOMAS ROBERT JONES is the "taxpayer', and that name and legal address goes in the proper box at the top of the form - street address and postal code. The S.I.N. number belongs to THOMAS ROBERT JONES, the legal identity, not to the free will human commonly called Thomas Robert of the Jones family, so, put that number in the appropriate box. Further instructions on the 'how to's' below.
Before we proceed, you must remember the following points: 1. You, the free will man or woman, are the 'principal', and the source of exchange for money. Because you do the work, you have an equity claim on valuable assets which are collected, held and spent under the strawman name. 2. The 'birth certificate name', your 'strawman', is your 'agent' in commerce. A quick check of the name on your credit, debit, and government issued cards will prove this fact to you. The 'all caps' apparently means a legal identity/ strawman pledged as chattel in national bankruptcy. The 'strawman' is the birth certificate name. 3. All money you get for the exchange of your labour and/or skills, interest on investments, bank interest, etc. is collected and banked by your 'strawman' as 'income'. That is the business of your 'agent http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
in commerce' and 'trustee in trust', your 'strawman'. Dealing with government for services such as passport, health care, and pensions is all in the name of the strawman. 4. You, the principal, must complete the T1 General 'Return of Income' form as part of your obligations of the 'contract of agency' with the strawman. As a 'ghost', it is incapable of doing anything physical or mental. Also, this help prevent harassment by Crown agents who see your physical body as being 'one and the same' as the strawman. 5. You will also need to complete a 'Statement of business activities' (T2125) - first 2 pages only. This is a 'profit and loss statement' for the strawman's business of agency. 6. No need for a Provincial tax schedule. Federal Tax Schedule 1 has the basic exemption and the calculation for 'tax owing' (which should be $0.00) and where you calculate any withheld money you demand be returned to you. Recent year T1s require the Schedule 1 to be completed and attached. 7. It is very important that you complete the signature block at the bottom of the T1 or IRS 1040, and, in the way I direct. When you filed 'AS' the strawman (the slave) in the past, the tax collectors didn't much care if the forms were filed with a signature, or not - as long as there was the identifying name and number. In this method of filing, you are filing 'FOR' the slave/strawman, and you need to show that in the signature box. Note: You are not filing for yourself - you are filing for a 'strawman', a brainless fictional entity, your 'agent' - just as you would file for a working mentally retarded adult son. In the 'Statement of business activities' [T2125] blank which asks for 'main product or service', I would suggest: 'Agent in commerce'. The 'strawman' performs no work or service, and has no skills, mind or physical body to do anything else http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
but legal agent. As a 'ghost', the strawman has NO expenses other than the money to be paid over to the principal - you, which would represent 'deductions', not expenses. THOMAS ROBERT JONES is in contract with you, the free will man or woman, to collect and turn over your wages, or, more correctly, the asset value, to you, the one who exchanged your "skill and/or labour" for wages. Where is the contract? It can be a verbal and certainly private contract. Has CRA or a judge the right to see evidence of this contract? No! Third party interference in a private contract is forbidden by law, since contracts come under the unalienable right of property. Your contract must have a "consideration", so, you would allow THOMAS ROBERT JONES a sum of money for services rendered. NOTE 1: Don't use the © copyright symbol after the strawman's 'all caps', or the proper noun spelled name. It is not a good idea to do so. NOTE 2. CRA may attempt to throw you a curve by disputing some of your completed forms. For instance, the T2125 is a prescribed form for 'profit and loss', and the strawman has no expenses other than what is paid to the principal. Therefore, should you receive such a notice from CRA, I suggest you promptly inform CRA that you do not accept the contract offered in their letter dated (?), and that the T1 and T2125 of (date of filing) on behalf of THOMAS ROBERT JONES stands as filed. Signed: I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family for THOMAS ROBERT JONES. There may be a few wording changes in the 2009 version of the T2125, but that shouldn't require a lot of thought to figure it out. NOTE 2. For those of you who use this filing method, and then find that you are losing sleep over whether CRA accepted the T1 return, you can, after a reasonable length of time, request a Statement of Account from CRA. You would give your all caps name and Social Insurance number.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
The Filing Method for the Canadian 'Canada Revenue Agency' T1 and T2125 The IRS 1040 and Business Profit and Loss Statement are practically identical - 1040 instructions below.
Before you begin, you need to learn this RULE: "RTFDT!" Standing for: READ THE FREAKING DIRECTIONS TWICE! The forms used for instruction are 2007 or later forms. Earlier year forms may be a bit different. But, the instructins here should not be too far off any form changes. Obtain the T1 Package (T1 = 4 pages and Schedule 1 = 2 pages) and form T2125 from a CRA office or download from the internet. (Linked below). It is in PDF format. IRS forms would be obtained from an IRS office or from their website (also linked below). To Complete the Business Expense Form first (T2125) . Fill in the Name and Address block using your all caps name, as on your Birth Certificate. Then the street address and postal or Zip code. Fill in the SIN# or SSN#, [That is not your Number, it belongs to the strawman]. Business name is the same as your all caps spelled name. If you have a proprietorship, in the 'business name line: (example) JOHN DOE AKA: JOHN'S CLEANING SERVICE. Nearby is a space for the type of business activity: Print - 'Agent in commerce'. Any request for business name or birth date refers to your strawman. Fill in if you wish. I have prepared a file with pre-printed responses, (linked below) however you can do your own in small font size, and cut and paste with school glue or use label paper. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Next comes 'Gross Income'. Since CRA may attempt to use GST shenanigans, I am now recommending that you paste the following notice over the Gross Income box (line 101 thru 143), Use a small font size. Copy and paste to your word processor. Change font to an 8 or 10. Replace 'John Doe' with your name, and other changes to fit you. Print 2 copies for each year filing. Then, cut out the text and glue one on the T1 and one on the T2125. This NOTICE goes on page 2 of the T1 form and page 2 of the T2125 form pasted on the Gross Income box or area. Notice: The free will living man commonly called John Henry of the Doe family, the undisclosed principal, is not subject to government legislation, is not a 'fiction/person', and thus, is not a 'taxpayer. The free will living man is not attached as an accessory to Crown property, and he or she only uses the Crown owned legal identity name under private necessity as his/her agent in commerce and trustee in trust to sustain and maintain his/her life. Therefore, any remuneration for mental or physical labour, or from risk, for the free will man commonly called John Henry of the Doe family and collected, and/or held in trust in any form of asset value by JOHN DOE, the agent in commerce and trustee in trust for that principal and beneficiary, is under claim of right in equity by the undisclosd principal and beneficiary, and is contractual exchange of property, and, as such, is not income for JOHN DOE. If a T4 is enclosed, it is for reference to the withheld wages belonging to and collected for the undisclosed principal by the agent, and is otherwise in error in referring to JOHN DOE as an employee, or having an employee status http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
with an employer or any other contracting party. JOHN DOE receives, as agent in commerce under private contract of agency with the principal, an annual fee of $3,500.00 for services. (In using this notice to paste to page 2 of the T2125, add this:) "T2125 form used, as no CRA form available for specific use by an agent collecting or holding money or other property for an undisclosed principal that is not income of/for the agent."
Notes on above notice: Wherever 'employee' is found on the T4 (USA W-2) slip, cross it out and print in'agent'. Initial all changes, as you would a change on a cheque. Now, continuing with the Gross or total income section: Disregard the sub-gross income lines and only use the total line. In the total box, you would print: $3,500.00 Note: The reason for choosing $3,500 is that it puts you below the Canada Pension basis, and thus prevents assessment for CPP payment. Then follow down under total gross income until you come to the line 'Other Expenses' [line on T2125] and print on the line provided: "All remuneration collected by the agent belongs to the principal". In the box where a number usually goes on this line, print: "All Collected Remuneration Minus Net income" Continue into the Net Income calculation area and on the Total Net Income box, print: $3,500.00 [That is the sum you have agreed by contract with your strawman as being its fee.] The IRS number may need be a bit less, to be below the basic exemption. Use the same number in the Net Income and Net Income after adjustments boxes. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
The T2124 is four pages, but you only need the first two. Next, complete the T1 (four pages). You complete the identification box using the all caps spelled name, then the address and SIN#. Remember the name and the number are NOT yours. They belong to the fiction 'legal identity/natural person'. You are completing the returns FOR this entity. It is the 'entity' which has a 'legal marriage', and the birthday is that of the entity, not yours, (although they are usually the same). Next comes the 'Total Income' calculations. Do the same as you did for the T2125 form. Use only line 150, and repeat at the top of page two. Also, it is a good idea to put a short dash in boxes on the forms that you do not use. Then drop down to the line that says "OTHER DEDUCTIONS" in the Net Income section. [DO NOT use the line 'other employee expenses' ]. In that line, you put the same info as you did in the line 'other expenses' on the T2125 form. Net Income can be anything from $1.00 to the amount of the Basic Exemption, which for 2005 is $8,648.00. I suggest an easy number like $3,500.00. This is the 'Agent in Commerce' fee for the year's duty. The amount is by 'private contract of agency', which is not subject to scrutiny by a third party, such as CRA or a judge. Next comes Taxable Income. Go to the Total box and print: $3,500.00 Now, leaving the T1 for a bit, move over to Schedule 1 (2 pages). Taxable income goes on the top line (Suggested: $3.500.00) Drop down to 'basic exemption' and repeat the number they provide in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
the number box. (Get this from Schedule 1) Move on down that section to where it says 'Add lines 300 to 326, and put the basic exemption number in the numbers box. Repeat that number in 'Total federal non-refundable tax credits' numbers box. Over to page 4. Enter '$0.00' in line 12 (429) Repeat the '$0.00' on line 19 (420) Back to the T1 page 4. Enter '$0.00' on line 420 (at the top of page) and again on line 435. If you have had taxes withheld, use the next section to claim it back. You would attach or include with the T1 form the T4 slips (USA W-2) that you received from your employer; however you need to cross out the word 'employee' wherever found on the T4, and print in nearby the word 'agent', and then initial each change. The reason for attaching the T4 slips is to show proof of withholding of your wages that you demand returned to yourself. CRA has used that 'employee' description of your strawman as a basis for amending the T1 income, and adding the income to the 'taxable income'. [* See note below, should this happen to you.] Therefore, print across the T4 form: "For Reference To Withheld Wages Only". Finally, either put in $0.00 tax owing (485), or your claimed refund (484). Then, you go to the signature box and either scratch it out with a few diagonal lines through it and make a new signature box above. You can also put a 1 in. by 3 ½ inch label over the existing signature box. Then, you sign it as the example below, and date it.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "strawman" without a brain, and facilities to write, the T1 form is autographed thusly: Only that shown as the 'all caps' 'legal identity/strawman' name, (and it doesn't have to be in all caps), need be hand written - just as you would sign a cheque. However, make sure you put the whole phrase in the signature block. To explain: The sequence is you, the free will man, being the 'scribe' for the 'legal identity' which is agent for Her Majesty, the principal, owner and guarantor of the legal identity name you find on the birth certificate, where the family name has been converted to a 'surname' meaning: 'primary name', and thus a fiction. I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family, for THOMAS ROBERT JONES, for Her Majesty in Right of Canada. I don't recommend using the (:) punctuation for your name. The method is correct; however, it seems to be conveniently ignored by government stooges. ALSO, do not use 'known as'. USE 'commonly called'. Keep a copy of your returns. The best way to go is to 'keep it simple'. No other expenses need be shown, as a ghost [your legal identity/strawman] has very little need of housing, office expenses or transportation.
* NOTE 1: Some people have been getting a letter back from CRA stating that they are not accepting the T1 as filed and then include a huge assessment. If you receive any assessment, invoice, fine or statement of account from Government, - please be aware, such documents DO NOT constitute BILLs. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
If you should be one of a few people upon whom the CRA chooses to pull this scam of amending or rejecting your T1 as filed, send an e-mail request to me for the proper answer to CRA on this matter. This proper answer includes asking for a proper bill. If they do send you such a "Bill", [which they likely will not do] , just write on the Bill the phrase "Consumer Purchase" and sign it with your cheque signing signature, and send it to the billing party. The Bill is settled! Apparently, the French version of this Act directs one to put "consumer purchase" on the back of the bill, so be safe and do it on front and back. This, according to Section 57(1) and Section 190 of the Bills Of Exchange Act Canada Presumption of value 57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party thereto for value.
Further information on the topic? Download Explaining Bills Of Sale, in RTF format. NOTE 2: DO NOT file a T1013 - Authorizing a Representative. Do not be suckered by CRA into filing a T1013 form - 'Authorizing a Representative'. The reason: The Income Tax Act of Canada defines 'person', [which you are not] as a 'legal representative' of a 'person/fiction'. You are NOT a 'legal representative' of your 'strawman'. You merely perform as a 'scribe' for the 'strawman'. Income Tax Act of Canada Section 248: "person", or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes any corporation, [clipped for brevity] or 'other legal representatives of such a person', [clipped for brevity];
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
CRA Forms: T1 Packages T2125
Extra info on filing IRS 1040. I have heard that there have been a few incidents of the IRS using the threat of your being charged with filing a frivolous return as a scare tactic against using this method. If you get such a threat, responds with: "This taxpayer wishes to comply with all rules and laws arising out of the IRC. Please inform me as to what is frivolous, unlawful or illegal in the return of income filed for (strawman name) for the tax year (year)." Sign with 'for (strawman written signature)'. I am sure this is a bluff scare tactic, and this response would mitigate their filing charges, as you have offered to settle the dispute. The IRS has not yet posted anything relative to this method of filing on their frivolous arguments webpage. There have been no reports of anyone ever having been charged using this method. Re: Reported 2010 requirement to report gun ownership and pay a tax on each owned gun. [This year's filing will be the 2009 filing. This may have been an internet hoax.] Since there is no requirement (yet) to 'register' guns, except certain types, in the USA, there are no guns shown to be 'owned' or 'possessed' by a legal name. Thus, a 'legal name', and not the adult man (m or f) with whom it is associated as 'agent in commerce' and 'trustee in trust', has no record of 'gun ownership or possession'. So, in filing for your 'strawman/legal name entity' you, as a free will adult man, would NOT report any guns that are in your possession. Since you are not a http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
'person' nor 'taxpayer', what you own is none of their business and is not 'taxable' nor 'mandatorily reportable'. For USA reference: Title 26 USC IRC, Subtitle F, CHAPTER 61, Subchapter A, PART II, Subpart B, Section 6012 is entitled: "Persons required to make returns of income" (a) General rule. Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall be made by the following: (1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount, except that a return shall not be required of an individual— As you can see, in the IRC, an "individual" is a "person", and a "person" is an adult human who has ignorantly accepted to be 'identified', such as one finds on a birth certificate, as being one and the same as him or her self. This false name carries with its use and acceptance, the status of "slave owned by the State". [A recent USA failure to file case was lost because the defendant did not know this fact.] You complete the identification box using the all caps spelled name, then the address and SSN#. Remember the name and the number are NOT yours. They belong to the fiction 'legal identity/natural person'. You are completing the returns FOR this entity. It is the 'entity' which has a 'legal marriage', and the birthday is that of the entity, not yours, (although they are usually the same). I suggest putting short strokes or dashes in boxes into which you put no numbers or data. This info is based upon 2005 1040, but more recent 1040 forms should differ very little. Quote marks are just for emphasis. Do not use on the forms. Filing status: I suggest single or filing separately, if married. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Exemptions: Yourself Income: Line 12: "Gross income minus Total income Modify the above notice for the Canadian T1 form shown above to fit your numbers and change 'Crown' to 'State'. The Canadian T-4 = US W-2 form. Paste it on the 'Gross or Total Income' area of the 1040 return. If filing for previous years, use a smaller 'adjusted gross income' number, as the basic exemption was a bit less than $5,000. Income: Line 22 only: "$5,000.00" Adjusted Gross Income: Line 37 & 38: "5,000.00" Tax and Credits: Line 40 [basic exemption]: "$5,000.00" Tax and Credits: Line 57 & 63: "0" Refund: Attach W-2s, change any reference to "employee" it "agent" and initial the change, and enter the total withheld. Line 71 & 75: $0.00 Use a sticky label to cover the signature box, and sign as directed in the T1 instructions above. Now, on to Schedule C (form 1040), Profit and Loss From Business The Proprietor and business name are the same - your birth certificate name in all caps. Principal business is: "Agent in Commerce" The 'person' has an address, a place on the deck of the make-believe ship, so you enter your usual address. The SSN# belongs to the State owned birth certificate name, not to you; so, you enter that. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Remember, as an adult human, you are 'without name or number'. You just have a 'commonly known as' name. The names registered with the State are those of a 'slave child', or of a legal fiction/legal identity name [birth certificate name] owned as intellectual property by your State of birth, or State of entry. Income: Line 7: "Unknown, IRS choose a number" Expenses: Line 27 & 28: "Gross income minus $5,000.00" Last is Other Expenses: Printed on the line in the box: "Paid to Principal as agent". Then, in the numbers box, and again on line 48: "Gross Income minus $5,000.00" Now, back to 1040 If you have a refund, claim it. Then, you go to the signature box and either scratch it out with a few diagonal lines through it and make a new signature box above. You can also put a 1 in. by 3 ½ inch label over the existing signature box. Then, you sign it as the example below, and date it. Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "strawman" without a brain, and facilities to write, the 1040 form is autographed thusly: [Write the whole thing, and you can use red ink if you desire] I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family, for THOMAS ROBERT JONES, for the State of (birth State). Please note: Although 'other legal representative' is not included in the definition of 'person in Section 7700 of the IRC, as it is in the official Canadian definition of 'person', it is highly recommended that you do not, in any wise, indicate that you are a 'representative for', 'agent for' nor 'an also known as' of the 'strawman/legal identity'. You are only in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
the capacity of 'scribe' for the 'strawman'. In turn, your strawman/legal identity is an agent for your birth State; and, since the strawman name is the property of the birth State (or State of entry), the State is principal and guarantor of any debts imposed upon its property. Keep a copy of your returns. It is preferable to 'keep it simple'. No other expenses need be shown, as a ghost [your legal identity/strawman] has very little need of housing, office expenses or transportation. For people who are 'employees' in the USA, and the employer insists on a W-4 (withholding form) be filed with 'payroll', you no longer have a tax liability if you use this filing method. I am not sure if this option is still available, but one could put up to 99 dependents on the W-4 to stop all withholding (as of 1983) if you anticipated enough deductions to not have a tax liability in excess of those deductions. If you attach the W-2 slips to the 1040 to prove that wages were withheld, and you request a refund, make sure that you cross out the term 'employee' on the W-2, and print in nearby, the word 'agent', and initial each change. and Print across the W-2 form: "For Reference To Withheld Wages Only" IRS Forms: 1040 Schedule C
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Power of Attorney no longer recommended as a desirable document.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Some definitions of 'person', and thus a 'taxpayer' add 'and other legal representatives' in defining the term 'persons', in the legal sense of the use of the term. A POA would constitute a 'legal representative'.
To Download these filing instructions in 'RTF' format, click HERE. To Download IRS 1040 instructions (USA) in 'ZIP' format, click HERE. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS! E-MAIL
Top of page HOME
© DetaxCanada 2004 thru 2011
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
PROPER WAY TO FILE A Canada Revenue Agency T1 Personal 'RETURN OF INCOME' When You Have A Demand To File By CRA, Or You Wish To Pay Your 'Fair Share', But No More - Which Should Be $0.00 Specific Filing Method for IRS 1040 at bottom of page. ©DetaxCanada ®
Last Edited March 27, 2011 Links fixed 'Contract of Servitude' concept no longer taught here. 'It's PROPERTY RIGHT'. Income Tax is the 'harvesting' of the fruits of the labour of 'owned slaves'.
Before we proceed on how to file a T1 'return of income', [or, IRS 1040], I would suggest that you download and study the Name Game Blog. In it, you will find that you have been entrapped into the income tax scam by Government's devious misuse, and maluse of the Unalienable Property Right. And, those who are teaching you that income tax is a contract issue, and that there are remedies through contract and commercial law, and through the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), are deceiving you BIG TIME. Slave? How did the Government make you a slave? Download and Read the The Name Game [in RTF format]. We need some details on what the process is all about. I have repeated many points, so that you will be reading this valuable information more than once - then, just maybe, some will stick in your 'gray matter'. Lord Blackstone, in his Commentaries of the late 1600's extended the great deception that all free will men and women are one and the same http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
as 'natural persons' by his definitions of 'natural' and 'artificial' persons, a scam which had begun in earnest in England around about 1300 AD. Yes, a 'natural person' is an appellation applied to a living man or woman, however, the status of that man or woman is that of a 'fiction' plantation slave status, and for purposes of fraud. All 'persons' are 'legal fictions'. Artificial persons are ships, or make-believe ships 'at sea' - bodies corporate or politic. A 'natural person' is a slave status imposed upon a human body, thus supposedly making the fiction a natural thing - but it is still a fiction make-believe. It is imposed upon you by a deceptive 'legal identity' created by the Crown in right of your birth Province, or by your birth State in the USA. You can recognize this 'legal identity' by the fact that your 'family name' or 'surname' is the primary name, and your given names, or the initials of those names, is for reference only. This is the name you find on your birth certificate. By using this name as your own name, you are entrapped into the legal make-believe world by the assumption that you and the legal identity are 'one and the same'. This scam is not by contract, but by your supposed violation of the Crown's or State's property right. One of the maxims of law out of the property right is 'accessio cedit principali' - an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal. The principal is the 'legal identity name', intellectual property claimed as being owned by the Crown or State. By your, as an adult man (male or female), supposedly voluntary use of that name, you are attaching yourself as an accessory to Crown or State property. That makes you property of the Crown or State, and, an adult man who is property is a SLAVE. Your parents gave their 'plantation slave' [birth certificate] names when completing the form for your Provincial, or for your State registry of live birth. The Crown in right of the Province, or the State, then http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
'assumed' custody of that 'child of slaves' under the Child Custody Act [or similarly named act] as any slave owner claims the child of owned slaves. The parents become only 'foster parents' to the child. The birth certificate is a 'chattel bond', or more correctly, a 'warehouse receipt', a trade name, and a number [SIN# or SSN#] imposed upon the 'registered' child slave - a physical immature human body. However, upon that child reaching the age of majority [usually age 21], that claim by government ceases, as a new scheme to entrap you into servitude must be made with the free will mind now recognized within that former child's body and brain. The 'captain, [your mature free will mind], of your 'earthen vessel', [your physical body], comes on board with a claim of right and assumes command. So, by deception and fraud, the servitude status is then assumed to exist by government by having you accept that you are 'one and the same' as the birth certificate name. As a mature free will man or woman, you are one 'without name and number'. No official public record shows that you have 'accepted' any name, and you have no labels on your body. The name on the Statement of Birth is that of the 'child' you were before you were recognized by society as having a free will mind. The Birth Certificate name is that of a 'legal identity', fiction name created and owned by the Province or State of your birth. Neither of these is your 'real name'. You ONLY have 'commonly known as' names for the remainder of your adult life. You DO NOT have 'also known as' names. That term refers to alternate names for the legal identity name. The Point: The Birth certificate name, however spelled, or in whatever case letters, is a name which belongs to the Crown or State, and imposes a 'plantation slave name or status' upon its user. The Statement of Birth name, however spelled, is the name of a 'child held in custody as a future slave'. So, using either name 'as your own name' will get you into trouble if http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
you use it in any government related forms, correspondence or forum. After age of majority, whatever name you use must indicate that it is only a 'commonly known as' and/or 'appelation' term/sound to which you will usually respond. Dad, Mom, Grandpa, Grandma, Hey You, Hey Dude, Woof or Meow work for most people. The primary remedy, relative to any Government forms or documents, is in the signature, and if more is needed, a claim of necessity in usage of the Crown or State owned name. By using 'for' or 'per' prior to signing any document, you alter the meaning of the signature to show that the party with the pen is not the party named or referred to in the document. And, if you find yourself in a court situation, you will need to file a claim that you only use the legal identity name under private necessity so as to curtail any assumptions that you are voluntarily attached to it. And, discovery can be requested to have the court show proof that you are one and the same as, or attached to the Crown or State property, and if they consider you of slave status, (which they do), then a demand for the authority, means and date that the Crown or State declared you to be of slave status. A secondary way that the Crown reinforces its claim upon you is by a contract of servitude - a feudal contract. This contract can be actual, as in joining the military; or, by assumpsit, where you obey a statute which only applies to a legal identity-fiction/person, and especially when you acknowledge the birth certificate name in a court hearing as being one and the same as yourself. However, this is not the method used to entrap you into being liable for the income tax. The 'real' you (while a child) were considered to be 'physical property', and thus had 'given' or baptismal names, and your 'family' name is for reference only. But, it must also be kept in mind that there is no record of your having accepted those 'given names', nor could you have as a child. To anyone else, they are only 'a commonly called names' or pseudonym nicknames, but,they are not your name. You have 'no name or number'. No adult man (male or female) has a name. You are a mind http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
functioning within a human physical body. A mind is a function and not a thing, and thus cannot be named, seen, photographed, DNA'd, fingerprinted, retina identified, nor any other physical means of being identified. There is no proof that any registered names are your names. Remember, we see no 'family' name for Jesus (Yehsuah) in the Bible. As with the custom of the time, He would have been referred to as Yehsuah ben (son of) Joseph, or Yehsuah of Nazareth. The European people have usually adopted 'a son of', a trade name, or a place name which eventually became a family name. The Historical Research Center, England It was not until the middle ages that surnames were first introduced to distinguish between people bearing the same personal name or Christian names. With the growth in documentation necessitated by the expanding administrations of medieval rulers who were eager to replenish their exchequers by improving their tax collection system, such surnames became essential. The reasoning behind this was that the Pope of Rome claimed ownership and authority over all mankind on planet Earth. In 1302, Pope Boniface VIII (c. 1235 - 1303) issued the papal bull Unum Sanctum, wherein the Pope says: "Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff." Other Papal Bulls of that time period proclaim that the Pope has supreme and final authority in all matters, both civic and spiritual. [GOOGLE "Papal Bull 1455" and "Papal Bull 1493"] However, the Pope could not commandeer the fruits of a man's labour, that being a product of a man's mind, as our Creator endowed us with a free will mind. And, you need to understand that this was the Pope, Boniface VIII, who conspired with Edward I, King of England to defraud and deprive the English people of their Anglo-Saxon Common Law. Thus, with the Pope claiming ownership of everything under, on and above the ground and the sea, the people had nothing to use to pay the http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Pope the demanded 'tribute' - taxes/bribe' demanded by the Pope as Pontifex Maximus of the Holy Roman Empire. So, a scheme had to be developed to extract the labour, or the fruits of the labour of a free will man. This scheme finally developed into the legal fiction name, and slave status it imposed upon the associated man. What does this all mean? And, please note: Replace the demonstration names shown herein with those names associated with yourself. First, for you to give or say your name in a court proceeding constitutes 'hearsay', which is 'a fraud upon the court'. A judge may choose to not complain about the fraud; however, you have eliminated your credibility in that court proceeding, and the judge then may disregard any evidence you may present. The only credible name you can give to the court is 'I AM'. Second, if you give your family name as being part of your name, you have admitted that you, and the 'legal identity' are one and the same, and that you are responsible for any debts and statutory obligations of the 'legal identity'. When asked to identify yourself in court, you say: "I do not consent to be identified by any name, and specifically not (strawman name). I am here to speak for and as primary creditor of the debtor and fiction called (strawman/birth certificate name)." Further instructions on court procedures are available by e-mail request. Third, the Crown (or State in the USA) created and owns the 'legal identity'. As such it is liable for all debts arising from any statutory obligations imposed upon 'persons' - and all statutes are only applicable to 'persons' - legal fictions, men in servitude to a corporate entity, and 'legal identities'. Your response: "You have invoiced the wrong party. Please send your invoice to the person who created and is liable for the legal identity, (strawman/BC name), which, I believe is the Crown in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
right of (birth Province), or State of (your birth State). A quote from the now defunct BBCOA webpage explains why the government must use legal fictions attached to men and women, and address all legislation to 'persons': "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person (corporation), an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other 'persons'. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible - mankind in their natural state." The above quote was in relation to two court cases in the USA: I cannot vouch for the following quotes, as I have not researched them; however, since all legislation, at all levels of government, both in the USA and Canada, are specifically directed at 'persons, and not to 'free will men and women, they ring true. If they could have been directed at, or applicable to the latter, then, due to the requirements of statutes to be clear and easily understood, they would be written so as to include free will men and women. The term 'person' is not a 'short-cut' for reference to free will men and women. "That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 May Term 1796. "governments are bodies politic" - Penhallow vs. Doane's Administrators 3 U.S. 54, 113 (1795). Lord Blackstone stated that 'artificial persons' are 'bodies corporate' or 'bodies politic'. Ergo: 'bodies politic' are corporations - make-believe ships. Therefore, the only *thing* required to file a 'return of income' is 'all persons resident in Canada' - found in Section 2 (required to pay an http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
income tax) and Section 150 (required to file a return of income -T1) of the Income Tax act of Canada. And in the US Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 USC, one finds that in Section 6012. "Doesn't this mean ME?", you ask. Our Creator God didn't create 'legal entities', otherwise known as 'persons'. Similar quotes can be found in Title 26 USC - the IRS CODE. (Sub-title A Section 2 and 7700-definitions] So, following this reasoning, the 'legal identity/natural person/strawman' identified by your physical body, (thus, associated with your body for the fraudulent purposes of extorting your labour or the fruits of your labour), has, as its only source of income, the fee you choose to pay it for its services as your 'agent in commerce' in dealing in the counterfeit Canadian or Federal Reserve currency, and/or as 'trustee in trust' of your assets. There is NO 'other income' associated with the strawman. In official records, or court transcripts, that 'person' name must be in all cap letters, [the 'all caps' spelling designating the slave as chattel pledged as a debtor in bankruptcy. The 'all caps' spelling does not create the strawman legal name - it is the conversion of the family name to sur, or primary name.] Although, in the past, and occasionally now, it appears as the 'nom de guerre' (war name) format, with one's family name first. However, even if correspondence comes to you in proper noun format from a government agency, it is still in reference only to the 'person' (sometimes referred to as 'strawman') name, which judges attempt to associate with your physical body. Your silence to their addressing you as 'Mister (family name) is usually sufficient for them to make the association/assumption that your body is the 'legal identity' entity they have on their court papers Remember, when you use the expression 'I am', you refer to your mind, which exists within your body, your earth vessel. The 'strawman' does not apply to your mind, nor affect your mind, except where the government may control your body to the detriment of your mind. The 'person' - strawman - legal name - [usually spelled in 'all caps', but not http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
necessarily so], attached to your body by the Crown can be thought of as a piece of sewer pipe through which you must reach to either receive, pay out, bank or invest Canadian dollars (or US FRNs). In this so called bankrupt country with non-backed script debt money [counterfeit money - actually a form of Middle Ages 'ship's script', as we live under corporate rule, and corporations are 'make-believe ships at sea], the present status of Canada and Canadian money [and also of the USA] since the 1930s, a free will man or woman cannot carry on commerce or deal in script money within this bankrupt corporation. Therefore, you need to deal in commerce through an agent, which is the all caps strawman-person. Just check the name on your credit or bank cards, or government issued cards It is this 'strawman-person' who receives wages as corporate 'income'. As a free will man, your wages are not taxable. And by the Royal Edict (1870) of Queen Victoria, a man's wages cannot be 'attached' = garnisheed. This was/is called 'The Wages Attachment Abolition Act, 1870'. So, what one does is to make a claim of right upon assets in one's strawman's name and create, (in your own mind, if you wish - a third party has no right to see it) a simple contract of agency between yourself, the free will man and the strawman-person the Crown has attached to your body. [Royal Edict: Legislation originated by the Queen, not Parliament] You will be paying a fee for the strawman's agency services[as proof of a contract of agency]; but, that fee per year needs be less than the individual minimum exemption - has been around $9,000.00 for the last while in Canada. There may be other exemptions, such as spousal, dependents and age. What you collected through the agent-strawman minus the agent's fee is your tax free wages or exchange of property. That amount goes into a business expense form as 'other' business expense (deductions) from the agent's gross income. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
According to law dictionaries and style manuals, an all caps name is either an acronym, ie: RCMP; or, by internal use in a corporation [body politic] as indicating a "legal fiction" designated as being a 'debtor'. A man in the military is of a "servant status" by contract, and is NOT a free will man. However, in the latter instance, the man's name is usually 'last name, first and second name' - a 'nom de guerre'. Apparently, even that name format is now being written in all caps. More recent speculation has it that the all caps spelling of the legal identity name signifies a slave pledged as chattel in bankruptcy by the debtor slave master/owner. In any case, it is irrelevant to us in this filing method. The relevant point is the inclusion of the family name as being the paramount name, and the given names as reference names. Since the government is a legal fiction, it, and any corporation (legal fiction) it creates, cannot recognize you, the free will man, and so must deal with [make contract with] you through a legal fiction entity. And, because the government [the Crown in right of Canada, or of a Province, or by the State] created this fiction version of your given and inherited name, it claims it as intellectual property, and bestows the status of plantation slave on any human who ignorantly accepts the name as being one and the same as himself/herself. A point of interest for Canadians:- If the Crown in right of a Province creates the legal fiction supposedly attached to a baby's body by a false birth certificate name, and the creator owns its creation; and then the Crown in right of Canada attaches a number [Social Insurance Number] to that legal fiction - legal identity, indicating that the Federal Crown is co-owner of that legal fiction, would Section 125 of the BNA Act and the 1982 Confederation Act be applicable? That section says: "No lands or PROPERTY belonging to Canada or any Province shall be liable to taxation." The birth certificate, the name on the birth certificate, and the legal identity which that name represents are the PROPERTY of the Crown.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
I often hear from people wishing to 'claim their strawman'. One cannot 'claim' another's property, unless there you have a proven debt against the owner of the property you claim. Since the legal identity name and the associated Social Insurance Number (SIN# or SSN#) belongs to the Crown or State, you cannot claim it. Since the Crown (or State) created the 'strawman' and claims ownership, the Crown (or State) is responsible for all debts imposed by the Crown (or State) upon the 'strawman'. Because you are in possession of the all caps name 'strawman', which acts as your agent in commerce, you use it as necessary to convert your labour and skills into what currently passes for Canadian (or USA) money so that you can obtain the necessities and conveniences of life. You, the free will man do the work or labour for the corporate body [employer] but the pay goes to your "strawman". Your "strawman" also is your agent for banking. Check your credit or bank card to see what name is there. Regarding anything to do with holding your assets, the strawman is your 'trustee in trust'. So, you see, the "strawman" receives the "gross income", which is your wages or other remuneration for your work, services or investments. That 'gross income' is subject to revision by exemptions,expenses and deductions. Since you choose to pay the strawman the sum of $3,500.00 for a fee for services (use of the strawman name), that is the 'net' and 'taxable' income of the person/strawman - as all else collected belongs to you under equity claim, and you are NOT a 'taxpayer'. You, the free will man received nothing as "income" - You get 'exchange value'. So now, CRA demands that THOMAS ROBERT JONES file a "return of income" USA instructions further down the page. Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "person resident in Canada", and the Income Tax Act of Canada says "every person (natural or artificial) resident in Canada must file a return of income" (Section http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
150). CRA may use a proper spelling of the strawman's name in their dunning correspondence; however, for formal demands and for court summons, they must use the all caps spelling of the strawman name. All caps just designates a fictional entity as a 'debtor'. Your status: Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is your "agent in commerce", you, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family are the 'scribe' for the legal fiction/entity, THOMAS ROBERT JONES. Now, getting to the T1 return. THOMAS ROBERT JONES is the "taxpayer', and that name and legal address goes in the proper box at the top of the form - street address and postal code. The S.I.N. number belongs to THOMAS ROBERT JONES, the legal identity, not to the free will human commonly called Thomas Robert of the Jones family, so, put that number in the appropriate box. Further instructions on the 'how to's' below.
Before we proceed, you must remember the following points: 1. You, the free will man or woman, are the 'principal', and the source of exchange for money. Because you do the work, you have an equity claim on valuable assets which are collected, held and spent under the strawman name. 2. The 'birth certificate name', your 'strawman', is your 'agent' in commerce. A quick check of the name on your credit, debit, and government issued cards will prove this fact to you. The 'all caps' apparently means a legal identity/ strawman pledged as chattel in national bankruptcy. The 'strawman' is the birth certificate name. 3. All money you get for the exchange of your labour and/or skills, interest on investments, bank interest, etc. is collected and banked by your 'strawman' as 'income'. That is the business of your 'agent http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
in commerce' and 'trustee in trust', your 'strawman'. Dealing with government for services such as passport, health care, and pensions is all in the name of the strawman. 4. You, the principal, must complete the T1 General 'Return of Income' form as part of your obligations of the 'contract of agency' with the strawman. As a 'ghost', it is incapable of doing anything physical or mental. Also, this help prevent harassment by Crown agents who see your physical body as being 'one and the same' as the strawman. 5. You will also need to complete a 'Statement of business activities' (T2125) - first 2 pages only. This is a 'profit and loss statement' for the strawman's business of agency. 6. No need for a Provincial tax schedule. Federal Tax Schedule 1 has the basic exemption and the calculation for 'tax owing' (which should be $0.00) and where you calculate any withheld money you demand be returned to you. Recent year T1s require the Schedule 1 to be completed and attached. 7. It is very important that you complete the signature block at the bottom of the T1 or IRS 1040, and, in the way I direct. When you filed 'AS' the strawman (the slave) in the past, the tax collectors didn't much care if the forms were filed with a signature, or not - as long as there was the identifying name and number. In this method of filing, you are filing 'FOR' the slave/strawman, and you need to show that in the signature box. Note: You are not filing for yourself - you are filing for a 'strawman', a brainless fictional entity, your 'agent' - just as you would file for a working mentally retarded adult son. In the 'Statement of business activities' [T2125] blank which asks for 'main product or service', I would suggest: 'Agent in commerce'. The 'strawman' performs no work or service, and has no skills, mind or physical body to do anything else http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
but legal agent. As a 'ghost', the strawman has NO expenses other than the money to be paid over to the principal - you, which would represent 'deductions', not expenses. THOMAS ROBERT JONES is in contract with you, the free will man or woman, to collect and turn over your wages, or, more correctly, the asset value, to you, the one who exchanged your "skill and/or labour" for wages. Where is the contract? It can be a verbal and certainly private contract. Has CRA or a judge the right to see evidence of this contract? No! Third party interference in a private contract is forbidden by law, since contracts come under the unalienable right of property. Your contract must have a "consideration", so, you would allow THOMAS ROBERT JONES a sum of money for services rendered. NOTE 1: Don't use the © copyright symbol after the strawman's 'all caps', or the proper noun spelled name. It is not a good idea to do so. NOTE 2. CRA may attempt to throw you a curve by disputing some of your completed forms. For instance, the T2125 is a prescribed form for 'profit and loss', and the strawman has no expenses other than what is paid to the principal. Therefore, should you receive such a notice from CRA, I suggest you promptly inform CRA that you do not accept the contract offered in their letter dated (?), and that the T1 and T2125 of (date of filing) on behalf of THOMAS ROBERT JONES stands as filed. Signed: I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family for THOMAS ROBERT JONES. There may be a few wording changes in the 2009 version of the T2125, but that shouldn't require a lot of thought to figure it out. NOTE 2. For those of you who use this filing method, and then find that you are losing sleep over whether CRA accepted the T1 return, you can, after a reasonable length of time, request a Statement of Account from CRA. You would give your all caps name and Social Insurance number.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
The Filing Method for the Canadian 'Canada Revenue Agency' T1 and T2125 The IRS 1040 and Business Profit and Loss Statement are practically identical - 1040 instructions below.
Before you begin, you need to learn this RULE: "RTFDT!" Standing for: READ THE FREAKING DIRECTIONS TWICE! The forms used for instruction are 2007 or later forms. Earlier year forms may be a bit different. But, the instructins here should not be too far off any form changes. Obtain the T1 Package (T1 = 4 pages and Schedule 1 = 2 pages) and form T2125 from a CRA office or download from the internet. (Linked below). It is in PDF format. IRS forms would be obtained from an IRS office or from their website (also linked below). To Complete the Business Expense Form first (T2125) . Fill in the Name and Address block using your all caps name, as on your Birth Certificate. Then the street address and postal or Zip code. Fill in the SIN# or SSN#, [That is not your Number, it belongs to the strawman]. Business name is the same as your all caps spelled name. If you have a proprietorship, in the 'business name line: (example) JOHN DOE AKA: JOHN'S CLEANING SERVICE. Nearby is a space for the type of business activity: Print - 'Agent in commerce'. Any request for business name or birth date refers to your strawman. Fill in if you wish. I have prepared a file with pre-printed responses, (linked below) however you can do your own in small font size, and cut and paste with school glue or use label paper. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Next comes 'Gross Income'. Since CRA may attempt to use GST shenanigans, I am now recommending that you paste the following notice over the Gross Income box (line 101 thru 143), Use a small font size. Copy and paste to your word processor. Change font to an 8 or 10. Replace 'John Doe' with your name, and other changes to fit you. Print 2 copies for each year filing. Then, cut out the text and glue one on the T1 and one on the T2125. This NOTICE goes on page 2 of the T1 form and page 2 of the T2125 form pasted on the Gross Income box or area. Notice: The free will living man commonly called John Henry of the Doe family, the undisclosed principal, is not subject to government legislation, is not a 'fiction/person', and thus, is not a 'taxpayer. The free will living man is not attached as an accessory to Crown property, and he or she only uses the Crown owned legal identity name under private necessity as his/her agent in commerce and trustee in trust to sustain and maintain his/her life. Therefore, any remuneration for mental or physical labour, or from risk, for the free will man commonly called John Henry of the Doe family and collected, and/or held in trust in any form of asset value by JOHN DOE, the agent in commerce and trustee in trust for that principal and beneficiary, is under claim of right in equity by the undisclosd principal and beneficiary, and is contractual exchange of property, and, as such, is not income for JOHN DOE. If a T4 is enclosed, it is for reference to the withheld wages belonging to and collected for the undisclosed principal by the agent, and is otherwise in error in referring to JOHN DOE as an employee, or having an employee status http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
with an employer or any other contracting party. JOHN DOE receives, as agent in commerce under private contract of agency with the principal, an annual fee of $3,500.00 for services. (In using this notice to paste to page 2 of the T2125, add this:) "T2125 form used, as no CRA form available for specific use by an agent collecting or holding money or other property for an undisclosed principal that is not income of/for the agent."
Notes on above notice: Wherever 'employee' is found on the T4 (USA W-2) slip, cross it out and print in'agent'. Initial all changes, as you would a change on a cheque. Now, continuing with the Gross or total income section: Disregard the sub-gross income lines and only use the total line. In the total box, you would print: $3,500.00 Note: The reason for choosing $3,500 is that it puts you below the Canada Pension basis, and thus prevents assessment for CPP payment. Then follow down under total gross income until you come to the line 'Other Expenses' [line on T2125] and print on the line provided: "All remuneration collected by the agent belongs to the principal". In the box where a number usually goes on this line, print: "All Collected Remuneration Minus Net income" Continue into the Net Income calculation area and on the Total Net Income box, print: $3,500.00 [That is the sum you have agreed by contract with your strawman as being its fee.] The IRS number may need be a bit less, to be below the basic exemption. Use the same number in the Net Income and Net Income after adjustments boxes. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
The T2124 is four pages, but you only need the first two. Next, complete the T1 (four pages). You complete the identification box using the all caps spelled name, then the address and SIN#. Remember the name and the number are NOT yours. They belong to the fiction 'legal identity/natural person'. You are completing the returns FOR this entity. It is the 'entity' which has a 'legal marriage', and the birthday is that of the entity, not yours, (although they are usually the same). Next comes the 'Total Income' calculations. Do the same as you did for the T2125 form. Use only line 150, and repeat at the top of page two. Also, it is a good idea to put a short dash in boxes on the forms that you do not use. Then drop down to the line that says "OTHER DEDUCTIONS" in the Net Income section. [DO NOT use the line 'other employee expenses' ]. In that line, you put the same info as you did in the line 'other expenses' on the T2125 form. Net Income can be anything from $1.00 to the amount of the Basic Exemption, which for 2005 is $8,648.00. I suggest an easy number like $3,500.00. This is the 'Agent in Commerce' fee for the year's duty. The amount is by 'private contract of agency', which is not subject to scrutiny by a third party, such as CRA or a judge. Next comes Taxable Income. Go to the Total box and print: $3,500.00 Now, leaving the T1 for a bit, move over to Schedule 1 (2 pages). Taxable income goes on the top line (Suggested: $3.500.00) Drop down to 'basic exemption' and repeat the number they provide in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
the number box. (Get this from Schedule 1) Move on down that section to where it says 'Add lines 300 to 326, and put the basic exemption number in the numbers box. Repeat that number in 'Total federal non-refundable tax credits' numbers box. Over to page 4. Enter '$0.00' in line 12 (429) Repeat the '$0.00' on line 19 (420) Back to the T1 page 4. Enter '$0.00' on line 420 (at the top of page) and again on line 435. If you have had taxes withheld, use the next section to claim it back. You would attach or include with the T1 form the T4 slips (USA W-2) that you received from your employer; however you need to cross out the word 'employee' wherever found on the T4, and print in nearby the word 'agent', and then initial each change. The reason for attaching the T4 slips is to show proof of withholding of your wages that you demand returned to yourself. CRA has used that 'employee' description of your strawman as a basis for amending the T1 income, and adding the income to the 'taxable income'. [* See note below, should this happen to you.] Therefore, print across the T4 form: "For Reference To Withheld Wages Only". Finally, either put in $0.00 tax owing (485), or your claimed refund (484). Then, you go to the signature box and either scratch it out with a few diagonal lines through it and make a new signature box above. You can also put a 1 in. by 3 ½ inch label over the existing signature box. Then, you sign it as the example below, and date it.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "strawman" without a brain, and facilities to write, the T1 form is autographed thusly: Only that shown as the 'all caps' 'legal identity/strawman' name, (and it doesn't have to be in all caps), need be hand written - just as you would sign a cheque. However, make sure you put the whole phrase in the signature block. To explain: The sequence is you, the free will man, being the 'scribe' for the 'legal identity' which is agent for Her Majesty, the principal, owner and guarantor of the legal identity name you find on the birth certificate, where the family name has been converted to a 'surname' meaning: 'primary name', and thus a fiction. I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family, for THOMAS ROBERT JONES, for Her Majesty in Right of Canada. I don't recommend using the (:) punctuation for your name. The method is correct; however, it seems to be conveniently ignored by government stooges. ALSO, do not use 'known as'. USE 'commonly called'. Keep a copy of your returns. The best way to go is to 'keep it simple'. No other expenses need be shown, as a ghost [your legal identity/strawman] has very little need of housing, office expenses or transportation.
* NOTE 1: Some people have been getting a letter back from CRA stating that they are not accepting the T1 as filed and then include a huge assessment. If you receive any assessment, invoice, fine or statement of account from Government, - please be aware, such documents DO NOT constitute BILLs. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
If you should be one of a few people upon whom the CRA chooses to pull this scam of amending or rejecting your T1 as filed, send an e-mail request to me for the proper answer to CRA on this matter. This proper answer includes asking for a proper bill. If they do send you such a "Bill", [which they likely will not do] , just write on the Bill the phrase "Consumer Purchase" and sign it with your cheque signing signature, and send it to the billing party. The Bill is settled! Apparently, the French version of this Act directs one to put "consumer purchase" on the back of the bill, so be safe and do it on front and back. This, according to Section 57(1) and Section 190 of the Bills Of Exchange Act Canada Presumption of value 57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party thereto for value.
Further information on the topic? Download Explaining Bills Of Sale, in RTF format. NOTE 2: DO NOT file a T1013 - Authorizing a Representative. Do not be suckered by CRA into filing a T1013 form - 'Authorizing a Representative'. The reason: The Income Tax Act of Canada defines 'person', [which you are not] as a 'legal representative' of a 'person/fiction'. You are NOT a 'legal representative' of your 'strawman'. You merely perform as a 'scribe' for the 'strawman'. Income Tax Act of Canada Section 248: "person", or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes any corporation, [clipped for brevity] or 'other legal representatives of such a person', [clipped for brevity];
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
CRA Forms: T1 Packages T2125
Extra info on filing IRS 1040. I have heard that there have been a few incidents of the IRS using the threat of your being charged with filing a frivolous return as a scare tactic against using this method. If you get such a threat, responds with: "This taxpayer wishes to comply with all rules and laws arising out of the IRC. Please inform me as to what is frivolous, unlawful or illegal in the return of income filed for (strawman name) for the tax year (year)." Sign with 'for (strawman written signature)'. I am sure this is a bluff scare tactic, and this response would mitigate their filing charges, as you have offered to settle the dispute. The IRS has not yet posted anything relative to this method of filing on their frivolous arguments webpage. There have been no reports of anyone ever having been charged using this method. Re: Reported 2010 requirement to report gun ownership and pay a tax on each owned gun. [This year's filing will be the 2009 filing. This may have been an internet hoax.] Since there is no requirement (yet) to 'register' guns, except certain types, in the USA, there are no guns shown to be 'owned' or 'possessed' by a legal name. Thus, a 'legal name', and not the adult man (m or f) with whom it is associated as 'agent in commerce' and 'trustee in trust', has no record of 'gun ownership or possession'. So, in filing for your 'strawman/legal name entity' you, as a free will adult man, would NOT report any guns that are in your possession. Since you are not a http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
'person' nor 'taxpayer', what you own is none of their business and is not 'taxable' nor 'mandatorily reportable'. For USA reference: Title 26 USC IRC, Subtitle F, CHAPTER 61, Subchapter A, PART II, Subpart B, Section 6012 is entitled: "Persons required to make returns of income" (a) General rule. Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall be made by the following: (1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount, except that a return shall not be required of an individual— As you can see, in the IRC, an "individual" is a "person", and a "person" is an adult human who has ignorantly accepted to be 'identified', such as one finds on a birth certificate, as being one and the same as him or her self. This false name carries with its use and acceptance, the status of "slave owned by the State". [A recent USA failure to file case was lost because the defendant did not know this fact.] You complete the identification box using the all caps spelled name, then the address and SSN#. Remember the name and the number are NOT yours. They belong to the fiction 'legal identity/natural person'. You are completing the returns FOR this entity. It is the 'entity' which has a 'legal marriage', and the birthday is that of the entity, not yours, (although they are usually the same). I suggest putting short strokes or dashes in boxes into which you put no numbers or data. This info is based upon 2005 1040, but more recent 1040 forms should differ very little. Quote marks are just for emphasis. Do not use on the forms. Filing status: I suggest single or filing separately, if married. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Exemptions: Yourself Income: Line 12: "Gross income minus Total income Modify the above notice for the Canadian T1 form shown above to fit your numbers and change 'Crown' to 'State'. The Canadian T-4 = US W-2 form. Paste it on the 'Gross or Total Income' area of the 1040 return. If filing for previous years, use a smaller 'adjusted gross income' number, as the basic exemption was a bit less than $5,000. Income: Line 22 only: "$5,000.00" Adjusted Gross Income: Line 37 & 38: "5,000.00" Tax and Credits: Line 40 [basic exemption]: "$5,000.00" Tax and Credits: Line 57 & 63: "0" Refund: Attach W-2s, change any reference to "employee" it "agent" and initial the change, and enter the total withheld. Line 71 & 75: $0.00 Use a sticky label to cover the signature box, and sign as directed in the T1 instructions above. Now, on to Schedule C (form 1040), Profit and Loss From Business The Proprietor and business name are the same - your birth certificate name in all caps. Principal business is: "Agent in Commerce" The 'person' has an address, a place on the deck of the make-believe ship, so you enter your usual address. The SSN# belongs to the State owned birth certificate name, not to you; so, you enter that. http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Remember, as an adult human, you are 'without name or number'. You just have a 'commonly known as' name. The names registered with the State are those of a 'slave child', or of a legal fiction/legal identity name [birth certificate name] owned as intellectual property by your State of birth, or State of entry. Income: Line 7: "Unknown, IRS choose a number" Expenses: Line 27 & 28: "Gross income minus $5,000.00" Last is Other Expenses: Printed on the line in the box: "Paid to Principal as agent". Then, in the numbers box, and again on line 48: "Gross Income minus $5,000.00" Now, back to 1040 If you have a refund, claim it. Then, you go to the signature box and either scratch it out with a few diagonal lines through it and make a new signature box above. You can also put a 1 in. by 3 ½ inch label over the existing signature box. Then, you sign it as the example below, and date it. Since THOMAS ROBERT JONES is a "strawman" without a brain, and facilities to write, the 1040 form is autographed thusly: [Write the whole thing, and you can use red ink if you desire] I, commonly called Thomas-Robert of the Jones family, for THOMAS ROBERT JONES, for the State of (birth State). Please note: Although 'other legal representative' is not included in the definition of 'person in Section 7700 of the IRC, as it is in the official Canadian definition of 'person', it is highly recommended that you do not, in any wise, indicate that you are a 'representative for', 'agent for' nor 'an also known as' of the 'strawman/legal identity'. You are only in http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
the capacity of 'scribe' for the 'strawman'. In turn, your strawman/legal identity is an agent for your birth State; and, since the strawman name is the property of the birth State (or State of entry), the State is principal and guarantor of any debts imposed upon its property. Keep a copy of your returns. It is preferable to 'keep it simple'. No other expenses need be shown, as a ghost [your legal identity/strawman] has very little need of housing, office expenses or transportation. For people who are 'employees' in the USA, and the employer insists on a W-4 (withholding form) be filed with 'payroll', you no longer have a tax liability if you use this filing method. I am not sure if this option is still available, but one could put up to 99 dependents on the W-4 to stop all withholding (as of 1983) if you anticipated enough deductions to not have a tax liability in excess of those deductions. If you attach the W-2 slips to the 1040 to prove that wages were withheld, and you request a refund, make sure that you cross out the term 'employee' on the W-2, and print in nearby, the word 'agent', and initial each change. and Print across the W-2 form: "For Reference To Withheld Wages Only" IRS Forms: 1040 Schedule C
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Power of Attorney no longer recommended as a desirable document.
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
ForcedtoFile
Some definitions of 'person', and thus a 'taxpayer' add 'and other legal representatives' in defining the term 'persons', in the legal sense of the use of the term. A POA would constitute a 'legal representative'.
To Download these filing instructions in 'RTF' format, click HERE. To Download IRS 1040 instructions (USA) in 'ZIP' format, click HERE. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS! E-MAIL
Top of page HOME
© DetaxCanada 2004 thru 2011
http://www.detaxcanada.org/filingT1.htm[2/20/2012 12:44:23 AM]
