Its Time to Demand IMPEACHMENT of Obama

-

-

BUT-------

----

Yes, you are right, it is time for ACCOUNTABILITY, it is time for REAL CHANGE, it is time that WE THE PEOPLE start clean the house and get some of that HOPE & PROTECTION for MAINSTREET back, and what you have been doing to Americans has CONSEQUANCES and it start with ========== YOU! -------that’s

== HOPE &

=

Following:

Its a letter that was sent to the FBI Director requesting that President Obama be investigated for numerous high crimes and misdemeanors-You Decide:

-

-

-

-

-

-

http://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/directormullerfbifinal-document4.pdf

=====================

Basic letter with the criminal charges against Obama Basic letter with the criminal charges with Signatures of American citizens for IMPEACHMENT of Obama. Receipt – Eric Holder receiving the complaint from American citizens Receipt – Glenn Fine AGJPresentments =

http://scannedretina.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/fbi-complaint-letter/

===================== Following is Receipt – Eric Holder:

======================================================

=====================================================
Posted on July 27, 2010

25 Reasons to Impeach Obama
By Fred Dardick, Impeach Obama Contributor

Last week Rep. Michelle Bachmann was asked what Republicans had in mind should they retake the House of Representatives this November, she replied “I think that all we should do is issue subpoenas and have one hearing after another and expose all the nonsense that is going on.” Considering the sheer volume of illegal and impeachable offences committed by Obama and his cohorts over the past couple of years, the House will be very busy indeed.

Putting aside Obama’s inept leadership, weakening of our national defenses and transparent attempt to socialize our great nation, there are a number of more practical crimes that once investigated could lead to Obama’s impeachment and perhaps even his well deserved imprisonment.

25 Obama Crimes the House Should Investigate in 2011
Convicted felon and Chicago real estate developer Tony Rezko’s purchase of land adjacent to Obama’s house in Hyde Park, IL. In 2006, Rezko sold a 10 foot strip of his property to Obama for $104,500, rendering the remainder of Rezko’s $625,000 investment too small to be developed and, for all intensive purposes, worthless. 2. The provision of the Obama campaign donor lists to ACORN in 2007 and 2008, more complete lists than the ones he provided to the FEC. ACORN used the lists to illegally raise money for Obama’s election from donors who had already maxed out their legally allowable contributions. 3. Widespread voter fraud including voter intimidation, ballot stuffing, falsified documents, and threats of violence against Hillary Clinton supporters committed by the Obama campaign and ACORN during the 2008 Democrat primary election. For more information see my CFP article How Obama Used an Army of Thugs to Steal the 2008 Democratic Party Nomination. 4. Obama’s refusal to release his long form birth certificate which would show conclusively that he is a dual citizen and therefore not constitutionally eligible to serve as President. Obama’s college records, which have also not been released, would also contain information regarding his dual citizenship status. 5. Protecting union interests over those of GM and Chrysler bond holders during bankruptcy proceedings, forcing investors to accept millions of dollars in losses in direct violation of bankruptcy laws, money to which they were legally entitled. 6. Preferential treatment given to minority and women owned car dealerships by Obama administration officials as part of the auto industry bailout program and the forced closing of a disproportionate number of rural dealerships located in areas that did not vote for Obama.
1.

Unsubstantiated firing of Corporation for National and Community Service Inspector General Gerald Walpin for exposing Sacramento Mayor and Obama supporter Kevin Johnson’s misuse of an $850,000 AmeriCorps grant. 8. Purchase of Congressional support for the passage of Obama’s healthcare bill including the “Cornhusker Kickback”, “Louisiana Purchase” and having the Department of Interior increase water allocations to the Central Valley of California to secure the votes of Democrat Reps. Dennis Cardoza and Jim Costa. 9. Lying to the American people by promising they could keep their healthcare coverage if they wanted to, when in reality tens of millions will be forced out of their current plans. 10. Attempted bribery of Rep. Joe Sestak with job offers to get him to drop out of the Senate primary race against Sen. Arlen Specter. 11. Directing the EPA to unilaterally set carbon emission standards, thus bypassing Congress which opposes Obama’s energy reform bill. For more information see my CFP article Forget Cap and Trade: EPA Regulation of CO2 Emissions Will Begin in 10 Months. 12. The Obama administration’s statement that a panel of experts had agreed with their plan for a 6 month Gulf Coast drilling moratorium, when in actuality none of them had supported the measure. 13. Bullying BP to set up a $20 billion slush fund to compensate Gulf Coast businesses and residents affected by the oil spill, to be administered by an Obama political appointee without any judicial or congressional oversight. 14. Implementing a third oil-drilling moratorium after the first two were thrown out of court, creating a de facto Gulf Coast offshore drilling ban in opposition to two judge’s rulings. 15. Establishment of a commission to investigate the Gulf Coast oil spill that contains not one oil industry expert and whose transparent purpose is to push a partisan political agenda rather than investigate the cause of the disaster. 16. Obama’s policy of intentionally not securing our nation’s borders, in opposition to Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution which calls for the President to protect states from foreign invasion, in an attempt to blackmail Republican support for comprehensive immigration reform. In essence,
7.

Obama is holding border states and residents politically hostage during a time they are being overrun by a narco-paramilitary invasion. 17. Department of Justice illegal race based policies regarding voter fraud as exposed by former Justice attorney J. Christian Adams. This includes the dropping of voter intimidation charges against 2 Black Panthers brandishing weapons in front of a voting location in Philadelphia and the stated intention by political appointees to ignore voter crimes committed by African Americans, Latinos and other minorities. 18. Department of Justice purposefully allowing some states to continue their disenfranchisement of military personnel serving overseas in direct opposition to the 2009 Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act, which was established in response to the more than 17,000 military votes that were not counted in the 2008 election because ballots had arrived after the deadline. 19. Recess appointment of Donald Berwick as head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services without even a token attempt to put him through the Congressional nomination process, signaling that Congress’s constitutional obligation to vet presidential appointees means nothing to Obama. The same can be said of the 30+ Obama administration czars. 20. Spending $23 million of taxpayer money through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to support a constitutional referendum in Kenya in spite of the Siljander Amendment, which makes it illegal for the U.S. to lobby for abortion in other countries. The Kenyan referendum was partially written by Planned Parenthood and is designed to legalize abortion in that nation. 21. The participation of the Obama administration in the firing of Sherry Sherrod from the USDA without due process because of publicized out of context remarks she made at a NAACP meeting in March 2010. 22. The White House sham investigation of BP’s involvement in the release of the mass murdering Lockerbie bomber from prison. The Obama administration not only knew beforehand of the Scottish government’s plan to set Abdel Baset al-Megrahi free on “compassionate” grounds, they even sent a letter to Scottish authorities stating their preference for his remaining in Scotland over his transfer to a Libyan prison.

23. The canceling of 77 properly filed oil field development contracts approved by the Bush administration by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, preventing the extraction of up to 3 trillion gallons of oil buried under Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and North Dakota, more than enough to end our dependence on foreign oil and supply the U.S. with its energy needs for hundreds of years at current consumption rates. 24. Investigations by the Department of Homeland Security to determine the political affiliation of people making Freedom of Information Act requests and the subsequent delay and even altogether ignoring of requests made by Republican affiliated individuals. 25. The hardest to prosecute in court, but worst crime of all that Obama has perpetrated against the American people is the economic tyranny that his socialist policies have wrecked upon our nation. While Obama has been living the life of a king, including frequent 5 star vacations, dozens of concerts at the White House and endless rounds of golf, all paid for by taxpayer money—the increased transportation and security costs alone are in the millions of dollars—he has called for the rest of us to endure economic sacrifice. The annual trillion dollar deficits and borrowing of 41 cents of every dollar of government spending by Obama is leading to unsustainable and potentially catastrophic debt. Something to Look Forward to These 25 crimes are just what I’ve been able to dig up over the past couple of weeks. No doubt there are many more that I have missed or still as yet undiscovered. While any one may be sufficient to impeach Obama, taken as a whole it demonstrates that Obama has little to no regard for the

rule of law.
I look forward to a Republican controlled House of Representatives uncovering Obama’s corrupt dealings and exposing this man as unworthy of the office of President Fred Dardick is the owner and operator of a medical staffing company based in Chicago. Prior to the business world, he worked as a biological researcher at various highly regarded universities in the United States.

http://floydreports.com/25-reasons-to-impeach-obama/

==================================================================================

KUHNER: President’s socialist takeover must be stopped
By Jeffrey T. Kuhner The Washington Times 5:58 p.m., Thursday, July 22, 2010

President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.

He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that
dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela‘s leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It’s time for him to go.

He has abused his office and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. His health care overhaul was rammed
through Congress. It was - and remains - opposed by a majority of the people. It could only be passed through bribery and political intimidation. The Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Kickback, the $5 billion Medicaid set-aside for Florida Sen. Bill Nelson - taxpayer money

was used as a virtual slush fund to buy swing votes. Moreover, the law is blatantly unconstitutional: The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a good or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power. Yet Obamacare’s most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children. This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens. Traditionalists - evangelicals, Catholics, Baptists, Muslims, Orthodox Jews - have been made complicit in an abomination that goes against their deepest religious values. As the law is implemented (as in Pennsylvania) the consequences of the abortion provisions will become increasingly apparent. The result will be a cultural civil war. Pro-lifers will become deeply alienated from society; among many, a secession of the heart is taking place. Mr. Obama is

waging a frontal assault on property

rights. The BP oil spill is a case in point. BP clearly is responsible for
the spill and its massive economic and environmental damage to the Gulf. There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia‘s Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda. Billions will be dispensed arbitrarily in compensation to oil-spill victims - much of it to Democratic constituents. This is cronyism and creeping authoritarianism.

Mr. Obama‘s

multicultural socialism seeks to eradicate traditional America. He has created a command-and-control
health care system. He has essentially nationalized the big banks, the financial sector, the automakers and the student loan industry. He next wants to pass “cap-and-trade,” which would bring industry and manufacturing under the heel of big government. The state is intervening in every aspect of American life - beyond its constitutionally delegated bounds. Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper. To provide the shock troops for his socialist takeover, Mr. Obama calls

for “comprehensive immigration reform” - granting amnesty to 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens. This would forge a permanent Democratic electoral majority. It would sound the death knell for our national sovereignty.
Amnesty rewards lawlessness and criminal behavior; it signifies the surrender of our porous southern border to a massive illegal invasion. It means the death of American nationhood. We will no longer be a country, but the colony of a global socialist empire.

Rather than defending our homeland, Mr. Obama‘s Justice Department has sued Arizona for its immigration law. He is siding with criminals against his fellow Americans.
His actions desecrate his constitutional oath to protect U.S. citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. He is thus encouraging more illegal immigration as Washington refuses to protect our borders. Mr. Obama‘s decision on this case is treasonous.

As president, he is supposed to respect the rule of law. Instead, his administration has dropped charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. This was done even though their menacing behavior
was caught on tape: men in military garb brandishing clubs and threatening whites at a polling site. A Justice Department lawyer intimately involved in the case, J. Christian Adams, resigned in protest. Mr. Adams says that under Mr. Obama, there is a new policy: Cases involving black defendants and white victims - no matter how much they cry for justice - are not to be prosecuted. This is more than institutionalized racism. It is an abrogation of civil rights laws. The Justice Department‘s behavior is illegal. It poses a direct threat to the integrity of our democracy and the sanctity of our electoral process.

Corruption in the administration is rampant.
Washington no longer has a government; rather, it has a gangster regime. The Chicago way has become the Washington way. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is a political hit man. He is an amoral, ruthless operator. It was Mr. Emanuel who reached out to Rep. Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania Democrat, offering a high-ranking job in the hopes of persuading Mr. Sestak to pull out of the primary against Sen. Arlen Specter. It was Mr. Emanuel who offered another government position to Andrew Romanoff to do the same in the Colorado Democratic Senate primary. And it was Mr. Emanuel - as the trial of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has revealed - who acted as the go-between to try to have Valerie Jarrett parachuted into Mr. Obama‘s former Senate seat. The only question was: What did Mr. Blagojevich want in exchange?

This is not simply sleazy

Chicago machine politics. It is the systematic breaking of the law - bribery, attempt to interfere (and manipulate) elections using taxpayerfunded jobs, influence peddling and abuse of power.
The common misperception on the right is that Mr. Obama is another Jimmy Carter: an incompetent liberal whose presidency is being reduced to rubble under the onslaught of repeated failures. The very opposite, however, is true. He is the most consequential

president in our lifetime, transforming America into something our Founding Fathers would find not only unrecognizable, but repugnant. Like all radical revolutionaries, he is consumed by the pursuit of power attaining it, wielding it and maximizing it. Mr. Obama‘s
fledgling thug state must be stopped. If Republicans win back Congress in November, they should - and likely will - launch formal investigations into this criminal, scandal-ridden administration. Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has promised as much. Mr. Obama has betrayed the American

people. Impeachment is the only answer. This usurper must fall.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/22/the-case-forimpeachment-142967590/
.

Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington think tank. He is the host of “The Kuhner Show” on WTNT 570-AM (www.talk570.com) from 5 to 7 p.m.”

==================================================================================

Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions,

There Would Be

Calls for Impeachment
Friday, 25 Feb 2011 02:53 PM By Jim Meyers and Ashley Martella

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV Friday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said President Barack Obama’s decision not to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage law eventually could lead to a constitutional crisis, as he

has directly violated his constitutional duties by arbitrarily suspending a law.

Gingrich even suggested that, if a “President Sarah Palin” had taken a similar action, there would have been immediate calls for her impeachment. Asked directly whether Obama could be subject to articles of impeachment, Gingrich said, “I think that’s something you get to much later. But I think clearly it is a dereliction of duty. Clearly it’s a violation of his constitutional oath. Clearly it is not something that can be allowed to stand." (A Gingrich spokesman stressed after the interview that we are not currently in a constitutional crisis, nor was Gingrich calling for the direct impeachment of the president. His statements were meant to illustrate the hypocrisy of the left and the mainstream media.) Obama Attorney General Eric Holder said on Wednesday that the administration will not defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the courts, which has banned recognition of same-sex marriage for 15 years. President Clinton signed the act into law in 1996. Obama’s decision to forego a legal defense of the law has caused a firestorm of anger from conservative groups. Gingrich slammed Obama for his decision, telling Newsmax that he

is

not a “one-person Supreme Court” and his decision sets a “very dangerous precedent” that must not be allowed to stand.
Story continues below the MUST WATCH video @
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Gingrich-Obama-Constitutional-

Crisis/2011/02/25/id/387455

“Imagine that Governor Palin had become president. Imagine that she had announced that Roe versus Wade in her view was unconstitutional and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had decided it should be changed. The news media would have gone crazy. The New York Times would have demanded her impeachment. “First of all, he campaigned in favor of [the law]. He is breaking his word to the American people,” Gingrich says. “Second, he

swore an oath on the Bible to become president that he would uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the United States. He is not a one-person Supreme Court. The idea that we now have the rule of Obama instead of the rule of law should frighten everybody. “The fact that the left likes the policy is allowing them to ignore the fact that this is a very unconstitutional act,” Gingrich said.
Gingrich said it is absolutely critical for Obama to comply with Congress and the constitutional process.

“I believe the House Republicans next week should pass a resolution instructing the president to enforce the law and to obey his own constitutional oath, and they should say if he fails to do so that they will zero out [defund] the office of attorney general and take other steps as necessary until the president agrees to do his job. “His job is to enforce the rule of law and for us to start replacing the rule of law with the rule of Obama is a very dangerous precedent."
Gingrich adds:

“I don’t think these guys set out to create a constitutional crisis. I think they set out to pay off their allies in the gay community and to do something that they thought was clever. I think they didn’t understand the implication that having a president personally suspend a law is clearly unconstitutional.”
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Gingrich-Obama-Constitutional-Crisis/2011/02/25/id/387455

===========

The Speaker of the House who initiated the last impeachment of a Democratic president has warned Barack Obama of the possibility of a

repeat. Newt Gingrich told NewsMax.com that Obama’s refusal to fight legal challenges against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — which was also passed while Gingrich was Speaker — created a “very dangerous precedent.” He invoked a comparison: ““Imagine that Governor Palin had become president. Imagine that she had announced that Roe v. Wade in her view was unconstitutional, and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had decided it should be changed. The news media would have gone crazy. The New York Times would have demanded her impeachment.” Gingrich warned Obama “swore an oath on the Bible to become president that he would uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the United States. He is not a one-person Supreme Court.” He added that

implementing ObamaCare after it had been declared unconstitutional presented additional cause for concern. He called on Congress to defund ObamaCare in its budget — and, if the president violates the law, “then you’d have a real crisis.” His comments in response to questions about
impeachment make clear that, although he is not yet ready to ask for proceedings to begin, he sees that as the outcome if Obama continues on his current lawless trajectory. Gingrich is at least the third person to call for impeachment over DOMA. Yesterday, Matthew Vadum added this dereliction was “a new” reason to impeach Obama. Not all who believe this is “an impeachable offense” oppose homosexuality. Gingrich is the highest-ranking politician to warn the president of the possibility of impeachment. As they ask in the cell phone commercial, “Can you hear us now?”

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-gingrich-warns-obamaabout-impeachment/
==================================================================================

The Big List of reasons to impeach is updated
after the Obama Sept. 9, 2009 address to Congress
Posted in September 10th, 2009 by Scott in Politics

The big list of 32 causes for impeaching President Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro).

The history of the current President of the United States of America, Barack Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these United States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. 1. He has violated his oath to defend the US Constitution by exercising powers forbidden by the Constitution. 2. He has used public money to purchase private companies. 3. He has illegally tried to use public money to create publicly owned companies. 4. He has embezzled public money allocated by Congress for rescuing distressed private financial institutions, and used it to purchase automobile manufacturing companies. 5. He has given our public money to finance foreign automobile companies. 6. He has given our public money to a foreign state to finance their staterun oil company while refusing to allow us to develop our own oil resources. 7. He has violated the principle of balance of powers by usurping Congress’ role of law maker. 8. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. 9. He has ignored the laws protecting us from the insolvency of financial institutions. 10. He has demanded and implemented Tax-and-Spend laws that inevitably lead to economic collapse.

11. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court based not on ability to interpret the Constitution, but on radical ideology and color of skin. 12. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Czars to harass our people and eat out their substance. 13. He has violated the balance of powers by appointing Czars with far reaching powers who are accountable to no one but himself. 14. He has as a matter of patronage stolen private industries from shareholders and given them to workers’ unions. 15. He has substantially benefitted his political financial supporters by giving public money to foreign industries. 16. He has arranged very large unscrupulous deals with private companies to exchange public money for his political advertising. 17. He has attempted to create a public industry, a health insurance company, that would compete with existing and similar private industries in open defiance of the consent of the people, and the letter and intent of the Constitution. 18. He has attempted to annul free of speech by setting up an illegal reporting system for recording the names of dissenters and by publicly attacking private citizens who oppose him. 19. He has counted illegal aliens as citizens to skew his standing with Congress. 20. He has illegally fired Inspectors General who found wrong-doing with his political crones. 21. He has attempted to insert himself into even the most personal life experience, our end of life care. 22. He has attempted to refuse to pay for medical treatment for wounded soldiers. 23. He has refused his assent to Laws of Congress, exercising false powers of veto that are contrary and insubordinate to the Constitution.

24. He has contradicted and violated the rule of law regarding bankruptcy after forcing the failure of one of our largest automakers. 25. He has appointed a Secretary of State who is ineligible for office. 26. He has attempted to force all citizens into mandatory servitude to the government. 27. He has wasted our precious time and resources on his pet projects, while neglecting to attend to critical issues of the general welfare. 28. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our lands, the merciless Islamo-fascist terrorists whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. 29. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 30. He has combined with Communist, Socialists and Fascists to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our American character, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation. 31. He has, in collusion with an insolent and irresponsible Congress, imposed Taxes against our consent not only on us, but also on our beloved children and our grandchildren denying them any representation. 32. He has nullified parts of our Constitution, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally our Form of Government. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms. Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated insults and injuries. A President whose character

is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant is unfit to be the Chief Executive of a free people. NOTES: 1. He has violated his oath to defend the US Constitution by exercising powers forbidden by the Constitution.
Barack Obama seems to have a disdain for the US Constitution. Curiously he used to teach the Constitution. The then Senator Obama said of his time as a professor at the University of Chicago: “I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution.” It’s nice to know he respects the Constitution. It’s too bad he does not preserve, protect and defend the Constitution also. [1] [2][3][4][5][6][8][11][12][14] [15][16][18][20][21][22][24][25][28] [29] [31][37][38][39][40][43][44]

2. He has used public money to purchase private companies.
Obama’s administration purchased General Motors. The Constitution forbids the government from buying and running private industries.[2][38][40]

3. He has illegally tried to use public money to create publicly owned companies.
Obama’s government tried to create a health insurance company. The Constitution forbids the government from doing this.[3]

4. He has embezzled public money allocated by Congress for rescuing distressed private financial institutions, and used it to purchase automobile manufacturing companies.
The public tax money Obama used for the General Motors purchase was designated by law for the support of distressed financial companies. It was not to be used for anything else. Obama took Congresses money and spent it on a car company against the law of Congress.[4]

5. He has given our public money to finance foreign automobile companies.
The so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program redistributed the public tax money and gave it to car dealers. The overwhelming majority of the automobiles purchased were of foreign make. Much of the money for those automobiles wound up lining the pockets of foreign automobile manufacturers.[5]

6. He has given our public money to a foreign state to finance their state-run oil company while refusing to allow us to develop our own oil resources.
Obama financed a Brazilian oil company using public tax money to search for foreign oil in Brazil. The company, Brazil-owned Petrobras, was a wealthy state run company, perfectly capable of doing the search itself. This was effectively a gift of US tax money to the investors in the company and its owner. At the same time we have plenty of oil in the US to search for and produce, especially in Alaska, and yet Obama denies us the right to develop our own oil resources.[6][7]

7. He has violated the principle of balance of powers by usurping Congress’ role of law maker.
Even the more radical leftists in Congress complained about his power grab. According to the complaints of the leftist politicians Obama is usurping the power of lawmaker from Congress through his czars.[8]

8. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
Obama’s financial plans for the recovery are based on communist, socialist and fascist ideas with no history of success, and every history of failure. While forcing these pre-doomed plans onto the economy, he would not execute economic practices that are know to work. He pursued tax-and-spend economic

policies, while refusing supply-side, tax cut based plans. This has extended the suffering caused by the recession. He tried to help the issues in banking without having a clear plan.[9][23]

9. He has ignored the laws protecting us from the insolvency of financial institutions.
According to bankruptcy law, specifically the Prompt Corrective Action law, failed banks are supposed to close and go into receivership to the government. Obama ignored the law. Instead he propped up failing banks artificially using public tax money and nationalized them. The law exists for a reason. It protects the banking system from collapse.[51][52]

10. He has demanded and implemented Tax-and-Spend laws that inevitably lead to economic collapse.
Obama claimed promised to not raise taxes as President. He raised taxes by turning them into debt to be paid later. He is also trying to raise taxes by driving up the costs of energy which especially hurts the poor. [10]

11. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court based not on ability to interpret the Constitution, but on radical ideology and color of skin.
Obama’s choice for Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor was certainly based on her latino heritage. She also has a history of

radicalism that makes it clear that her legal judgment is heavily slanted. [11][24][25]

12. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Czars to harass our people and eat out their substance.
Other Presidents have had czars, or the equivalent. Obama has created more of them than any other President. His czars are more radical and on the political fringe than those of any other President in history. Through them his is overriding the role of Congress as lawmaker.[13][26]

13. He has violated the balance of powers by appointing Czars with far reaching powers who are accountable to no one but himself.
The President’s cabinet needs to be approved by Congress. The Founders set things up this way for a reason. Obama’s czars form a shadow cabinet. Sometimes the czars have as much power as the cabinet members. The czars sometimes create laws which is a responsibility of Congress.[12][22]

14. He has as a matter of patronage stolen private industries from shareholders and given them to workers’ unions.
After Obama took over GM and Chrysler, he gave a large ownership of the companies to the Auto Workers unions. These

unions were big supporters of his during the Presidential election.[14]

15. He has substantially benefitted his political financial supporters by giving public money to foreign industries.
George Soros is a huge supporter of Obama and his causes. Just days before Obama gave billions of public tax money to Brazilowned Petrobras, Soros made a big financial move that earned him millions from Obama’s gift.[32][33]

16. He has arranged very large unscrupulous deals with private companies to exchange public money for his political advertising.
Obama arranged large potential deals with pharmacy companies. Those same companies gave large amounts of money to Obama for his presidential campaign. They have the ability to give more large amounts in the next election.[34][35]

17. He has attempted to create a public industry, a health insurance company, that would compete with existing and similar private industries in open defiance of the consent of the people, and the letter and intent of the Constitution.

This cause for impeachment, of course, is the imfamous H.R.3200 unconstitutional and very unpopular socialized medicine bill. The overwhelming majority of the US population doesn’t want it, yet he still insists on forcing it on us.[15][28][29][41][42]

18. He has attempted to annul free of speech by setting up an illegal reporting system for recording the names of dissenters and by publicly attacking private citizens who oppose him.
He set up a reporting system for people to email “tattle tales” about possibly incorrect or misleading information about H.R.3200 to his office. This would create a dampening effect on the people’s First Amendment right to discuss legislation. He also has openly and publicly attacked private citizens from his office. He is presently attempting to financially punish the forms of media, namely talk radio, which are most critical of him, effectively charging those media companies an unconscienable tax, one equal to their earnings, to stay in business. He intends to use those taxes to pay for equivalents to those forms of media that he controls.[16][21][37][39]

19. He has counted illegal aliens as citizens to skew his standing with Congress.
Obama is intending in the 2010 census to count all people in the US without questioning their citizenship status. This brings the US one step further in losing our national identity. This false

counting of the people gives those districts with large numbers of illegal aliens greater representation in the House of Representatives. This is effectively turning the government over to a foreign power to some degree. This is an act of treason.[44]

20. He has illegally fired Inspectors General who found wrong-doing with his political croneys.
Obama fired nspector General Walpin in an illegal manner after Walpin discovered legal improprieties committed by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, one of Obama’s political supporters. Obama did not give a reason for his firing. In a like manner, he fired Inspector General David Hoffman after Hoffman found wrongdoings with a nephew of Chicago’s infamous Mayor Daley, who is a longtime political associate of Obama’s.[17][30]

21. He has attempted to insert himself into even the most personal life experience, our end of life care.
Part of Obama’s unconstitutional H.R.3200 contains a provision for government evaluation and counseling for end of life care and potentially provides a paid service that affects the income of the counselor, benefiting them if the patient dies. This is horribly immoral.[31]

22. He has attempted to refuse to pay for medical treatment for wounded soldiers.

In an unbelievably disgraceful act, Obama tried to talk the Veterans Administration into having US soldiers pay for their medical treatment for wounds received in combat using their own medical insurance.[36]

23. He has refused his assent to Laws of Congress, exercising false powers of veto that are contrary and insubordinate to the Constitution.
Congress passed a bill directing how money from the International Monetary Fund should be spend. Obama effectively vetoed sections of the bill, saying that they interfered with his ability to conduct foreign relations. According the Constitution Obama does not have the right to conduct foreign relations, except as provided by Congress. He invented a nonexistent right to a line item veto, and then justified it with a nonexistent right to conduct foreign relations which were themselves contrary to the requirements of Congress.[18]

24. He has contradicted and violated the rule of law regarding bankruptcy after forcing the failure of one of our largest automakers.
According to bankruptcy law, secured creditors get paid by the bankrupt organization before unsecured creditors. When Chrysler went into bankruptcy Obama gave the United Auto Workers $0.50 on the dollar for their unsecured debt, while

giving the shareholders only $0.25 on the dollar for their secured debt. This is in complete contradiction to bankruptcy law.[19]

25. He has appointed a Secretary of State who is ineligible for office.
Obama appointed President Clinton’s wife, Hillary Clinton, to Secretary of State even though she is clearly illegal according to the Constitution. No Senator who votes for an increase in salary for a Cabinet office, such as Secretary of State, can be eligible for that office for a given period of time. Obama decided to ignore the Constitution, and appointed Clinton anyway.[54]

26. He has attempted to force all citizens into mandatory servitude to the government.
Obama originally planned to force every US citizen to do some kind of social work for the government for a minimum number of hours per year. Then he tried to make this applicable to only minors, which would also violate the child labor laws. [20][43]

27. He has wasted our precious time and resources on his pet projects, while neglecting to attend to critical issues of the general welfare.
On September 9, 2009 he addressed a joint session of Congress with a speech on HR 3200, trying to push socialized medicine onto the public. His greatest focus is on getting this project implemented. At the same time we are in the greatest economic

crisis since the Great Depression. He is neglecting the economy while attending to this pet socialized medicine project.

28. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our lands, the merciless Islamo-fascist terrorists whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
Obama promised to close the prisons for terrorists in Guantamo Bay in Cuba. To close this he will have to bring the prisoners to the US. He has also been actively involved with US radicals as a “community organizer” where he taught, preached and encouraged social disruption that favored radical socialists, communists and other alien ideologies.[48][49][50][53]

29. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
Obama has supported large complex bills that were produced for review only hours before Congress had the opportunity to vote on them. The members of Congress had no time to review the bills. The citizens did not have the opportunity to review and discuss them. The Constitution requires that the public be able to review and discuss legislation. Obama is required by his duty under his oath to veto all such bills.[45][46][47]

30. He has combined with Communist, Socialists and Fascists to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our American character, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.
Most notably, the Communists, Socialists and Fascists are Obama czars. He has a long history of associating and supporting such individuals.

31. He has, in collusion with an insolent and irresponsible Congress, imposed Taxes against our consent not only on us, but also on our beloved children and our grandchildren denying them any representation.
Obama executed H.R.1, misnamed the “Stimulus Bill,” under the pretense that this bill would help fix the recession, when in reality it appears it had more to do with political payolla for support for his candidacy for President. The debt incurred by this bill and other similar bill will take generations to pay off. Future generations had no say in these imposed taxes, so this is a classic example of the crime of taxation without representation.

32. He has nullified parts of our Constitution, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally our Form of Government.

All of the above prove this.
[1] Hawkins, A.W.R. “Eleven States Declare Sovereignty Over Obama’s Action.” 23 February 2009. HumanEvents.com: Headquarters of the Conservative Underground. 19 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30807>. [2] “Obama’s GM Plan Looks Like a Raw Deal: Congress, not a secret task force, should decide the company’s fate.” 29 May 2009. The Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 19 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124355327992064463.html>. [3] Bader, Hans. “Legal Experts and Civil Rights Commission Attack Obama Health-Care Plan As Unconstitutional.” 18 August 2009. OpenMarket.org: Free Markets & Limited Government. 19 August 2009 <http://www.openmarket.org/2009/08/18/legal-experts-andcivil-rights-commission-attack-obama-health-care-plan-as-unconstitutional/>. [4] Lucas, Fred. “Indiana Challenges Constitutionality of TARP Money for Auto Bailout.” 4 June 2009. CNSNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=49096>. [5] Manning, Stephen. “Clunkers rebates benefit Asian automakers’ sales.” 14 August 2009. TheSunNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.thesunnews.com/business/story/1022999.html?storylink=mirelated>. [6] Palin, Sarah. “Your Tax Dollars Hard at Work: First Cars, Now Foreign Oil.” 19 August 2009. Facebook: Palin, Sarah. 19 August 2009 <http://www.facebook.com/note.php? note_id=119471438434>. [7] “Obama Underwrites Offshore Drilling: Too bad it’s not in US waters.” 18 August 2009. The Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 19 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574346610120524166.html>. [8] Bresnahan, John. “Byrd: Obama in power grab.” 25 February 2009. Politico. 19 August 2009 <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19303.html>. [9] Ferrara, Peter. “Obama Is Delaying the Economic Recovery.” 22 July 2009. The American Spectator. 19 August 2009 <http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/22/obama-isdelaying-the-economic>. [10] “Morning Bell: The Obama Tax and Spend Economy is Here.” 2 March 2009. The Heritage Foundation. 19 August 2009 <http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-theobama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/> [11] “Judicial Watch: Judge Sonia Sotomayor and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.” 17 June 2009. Judicial Watch. 19 August 2009 <http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2009/SotomayorPRLDEFreport.pdf> [12] Klukowski, Ken. “Senior Democrat Says Obama’s Czars Unconstitutional.” 15 June 2009. Townhall.com. 19 August 2009 <http://townhall.com/Columnists/KenKlukowski/2009/06/15/senior_democrat_says_obamas_ czars_unconstitutional?page=full&comments=true>.

[13] “Q&A: Regarding these czars that President Barack Obama has been appointing, who pays their salary, who determines how much they make and are tax dollars involved at all?” 6 August 2009. Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 19 August 2009 <http://www.ajc.com/news/qaregarding-these-czars-that-president-barack-obama-94867.html> [14] “GM and Chrysler now part of Mayor Obama’s patronage farm.” 28 April 2009. Extreme Wisdom. 19 August 2009 <http://www.extremewisdom.com/?p=1949>. [15] Sage, Bobbie Marie. “How The Critics Feel About Obama’s Plans to Reform Health Care: Is The Government Unfair Competition?” About.com. 19 August 2009 <http://personalinsure.about.com/od/health/a/aa042809a.htm>. [16] “Cornyn accuses White House of compiling ‘enemies list’.” 6 August 2009. The Dallas Morning News. 19 August 2009 <http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/state/stories/DNcornynflag_06nat.ART.State.Edition1.4bb4d44.html> [17] Bodnar, Jacob. “Obama’s Illegal Firing of Inspector General Walpin.” 17 June 2009. The Spartan Review. 19 August 2009 <http://thespartanreview.com/?p=340>. [18] Eddlem, Thomas R. “Congress Rebukes Obama on Dictatorial Claim.” 11 July 2009. New American. 19 August 2009 <http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/congress/1402>. [19] Barone, Michael. “White House puts UAW ahead of property rights.” 6 May 2009. The Washington Examiner. 19 August 2009 <http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/White-House-puts-UAW-ahead-of-propertyrights-44415057.html>. [20] Watson, Paul Joseph. “Obama Website Scrubs Mandatory Community Service Call.” 10 November 2008. Alex Jone’s Prison Planet. 19 August 2009 <http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-website-scrubs-mandatory-community-servicecall.html>. [21] “Records maintained on individuals.” Title 5. U.S. Code 552a. 19 August 2009 <http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000552—a000-.html>. [22] Albert, Richard. “Czars run counter to Barack Obama’s promises.” 20 July 2009. Politico. 19 August 2009 <http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25129.html>. [23] Hall, Kevin G. “Obama’s econ failure: Still no plan to fix the banks.” 12 March 2009. McClatchy. 19 August 2009 <http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/63871.html>. [24] Shapiro, Ilya. “Sotomayor Doesn’t Deserve a Supreme Court Seat.” 22 July 2009. The Cato Institute. 19 August 2009 <http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/07/22/sotomayor-doesntdeserve-a-supreme-court-seat/>. [25] Marx, Gary, and Long, Wendy E. “Sotomayor Nomination: Wrap-Up and Going Forward.” 6 August 2009. Obama’s Front Runners. 19 August 2009 <http://www.obamasfrontrunners.com/>.

[26] Braithwaite, Neil. “Beware the Czar’s of Obama!” 12 June 2009. Chron Watch. 19 August 2009 <http://www.chronwatch-america.com/articles/5057/1/Beware-the-Czars-ofObama/Page1.html>. [27] Mangru, Dan. “Does Anyone Care About the GM Shareholder?” 2 June 2009. MoneyNews.com. 19 August 2009 <http://moneynews.newsmax.com/dan_mangru/general_motors/2009/06/02/220550.html>. [28] “How The Critics Feel About Obama’s Plans to Reform Health Care.” 25 July 2009.Insurance Guide. 19 August 2009 <http://insurance.hirby.com/how-the-critics-feelabout-obamas-plans-to-reform-health-care/>. [29] McCollister, Rolfe. “Obama’s health plan creates monopoly.” 27 July 2009.Business Report.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.businessreport.com/news/2009/jul/27/obamashealth-plan-creates-monopoly/>. [30] Kass, John. “Obama’s political play should shock no one.” 21 June 2009.Chicago Tribue. 19 August 2009 <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-21jun21,0,1177440.column>. [31] Palin, Sarah. “Statement on the Current Health Care Debate.” 7 August 2009. Facebook: Palin, Sarah. 19 August 2009 <http://www.facebook.com/note.php? note_id=113851103434>. [32] “OBAMA BACKS OFF-SHORE DRILLING IN BRAZIL! U.S. TO LOAN $2 BILLION TO FINANCE EXPLORATION OF THE HUGE OFFSHORE DISCOVERY IN BRAZIL’S TUPI OIL FIELD UPDATE: A SOROS CONNECTION?” 19 August 2009.RightVoices.com. 19 August 2009 <http://rightvoices.com/2009/08/19/obama-backs-off-shore-drilling-in-brazilu-s-to-loan-2-billion-to-finance-exploration-of-the-huge-offshore-discovery-in-brazil’s-tupioil-field-update-a-soros-connection/>. [33] Blount, Jeb and Weiss, Miles. “Soros Hedge Fund Bought Petrobras Stake Worth $811 Million.” 15 August 2009.Bloomberg.com. 19 August 2009 <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aFHPjfeUvtl8>. [34] Grimm, Ryan. “Internal Memo Confirms Big Giveaways In White House Deal With Big Pharma.” 13 August 2009.Huffington Post. 19 August 2009 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/13/internal-memo-confirms-bi_n_258285.html>. [35] Kirkpatrick, David D. “Drug Industry to Run Ads Favoring White House Plan.” 8 August 2009.New York Times. 19 August 2009 <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/health/policy/09lobby.html? _r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss>. [36] “Change You Can Believe In – Obama’s Crimes Against Veterans.” 19 March 2009. Judging Truth. 19 August 2009. <http://www.judgingtruth.com/2009/03/change-you-canbelieve-in-obamas-crimes-against-veterans/>. [37] “President Barack Obama Crimes! Attacking America’s Private Citizens.” devils-bestfriend.com. 19 August 2009 http://www.devils-best-friend.com/President-Barack-ObamaCrimes-Against-Americans.html>.

[38] Jeffrey, Terence P. “The Illegal, Unconstitutional Bush-Obama Auto Bailout.” 1 April 2009.HumanEvents.com. 20 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php? id=31301>. [39] “ACLJ Calls on President Obama to Repudiate White House Comments Calling on Americans to “Flag” and Report “Fishy” Comments Opposing Health Care Plan.” 6 August 2009.Business Wire. 20 August 2009 <http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/? ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090806005755&newsLang=en>. [40] Lucas, Fred. “36 Congressmen Ask Obama to Return Authority Over Auto Bailout to Congress–But White House Says Its Not Over-Reaching Its Power.” 29 May 2009.CNSNews.com. 20 August 2009 <http://www.cnsnews.com/public/Content/article.aspx? RsrcID=48791>. [41] Rosenbloom, Frank S., M.D. “The Failed Promises of Government Funded Health Care.” 7 July 2009.American Thinker. 21 August 2009 <http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/the_failed_promises_of_governm.html>. [42] “Why an Obamacare “Public Plan” should be an easy target.” 24 June 2009.Patterico’s Pontification. 21 August 2009 <http://patterico.com/2009/06/24/why-an-obamacare-“publicplan”-should-be-an-easy-target/>. [43] “America Serves.” change.gov: The office of the President Elect. 22 August 2009 <http://change.gov/americaserves/>. [44] Baker, John S. and Stonecipher, Elliott. “Our Unconstitutional Census.” 9 August 2009.Wall Street Journal: Opinion Journal. 21 August 2009 <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204908604574332950796281832.html>. [45] “Democrat’s Midnight “Stimulus” Power Play.” 11 February 2009.House Republican Leader John Boehner. 22 August 2009 <http://republicanleader.house.gov/blog/?p=435e>. [46] Klein, Philip. “Stimulus Bill Becomes Available ‘Round About Midnight.” 13 February 2009.The American Spectator. 22 August 2009 <http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/13/stimulus-bill-becomes-availabl>. [47] Hair, Connie. “Republicans Shut Out of Stimulus Conference Negotiations.” 11 February 2009.HumanEvents.com. 22 August 2009 <http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30667>. [48] Lewis, James. “Barack Obama and Alinsky’s Rules for Psychopaths.” 25 September 2008.American Thinker. 22 August 2009 <http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_alinskys_rule.html>. [49] “Camp Alinsky Obama.” 4 October 2008.The Real Barack Obama. 22 August 2009 <http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/10/04/camp-alinsky-obama/>. [50] Rowley, James. “Obama’s Plan to Close Guantanamo Forces Decision About Inmates .” 3 December 2008.Bloomber.com. 22 August 2009 <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? pid=20601086&sid=azraH32qUfn0>.

[51] “Camp Alinsky Obama.” 5 April 2009.PBS. 23 August 2009 <http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2009/04/william_k_black_on_the_prompt.html>. [52] Black, William K. “Why Is Geithner Continuing Paulson’s Policy of Violating the Law?” 23 February 2009.The Huffington Post. 23 August 2009 <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/why-is-geithnercontinuin_b_169234.html>. [53] Foon, Rhee. “Cheney rejoins battle over interrogations” 25 August 2009.Boston.com. 25 August 2009 <http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/08/cheney_rejoins.html>. [54] “Rodearmel v. Clinton.”Judicial Watch. 5 September 2009 <http://www.judicialwatch.org/rodearmel-v-clinton>.

http://www.amorian.org/2009/09/10/the-big-list-of-reasons-to-impeach-isupdated-after-the-obama-sept-9-2009-address-to-congress/

==================================================================================

Rep. Trent Franks, who represents Arizona’s 2nd Congressional district, is chairman of the Constitution subcommittee Supports IMPEACHMENT of Obama.

A Congressman is On Board: Impeach Obama Over DOMA
Posted on March 3, 2011 by Ben Johnson

Must Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch? feature=player_embedded&v=_yCN93ZNJEM
A sitting Congressman has endorsed the call to impeach President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder. Rep. Trent Franks, R-AZ, told Scott Keyes of ThinkProgress.org he would “absolutely” support impeachment if enough fellow Congressmen would support him. The left-wing blog posted an interview it filmed of the four-term Congressman at the Tea Party Patriots Policy Summit in Phoenix, in which Franks called for holding Obama and Holder accountable for violating the rule of law. Keyes asked if Franks would consider defunding the Department of Justice over its refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Franks called withholding funds from the department “probably the strongest leverage that we have.” When Keyes asked if Franks personally supported the measure, he responded, “Absolutely. I would support that in a moment. This Department of Justice has proven itself to be so committed to the ideology of Barack Obama that perhaps he should change the name.” The left-wing blogger then returned to DOMA and raised the subject of impeachment: Keyes: I know Newt Gingrich has came out [sic.] and said if they don’t reverse course here, we ought to be talking about possibly impeaching

either Attorney General Holder or even President Obama to try to get them to reverse course. Do you think that is something you would support? Frank: If it could gain the collective support, absolutely. I called for Eric Holder to repudiate the policy to try terrorists within our civil courts, or resign. So it just seems like that they have an uncanny ability to get it wrong on almost all fronts. Franks is the first sitting Congressman to raise the specter of impeachment while in office. However, while successfully campaigning to regain his old House seat last fall, Michigan Republican Tim Walberg said the GOP must be willing to confront Obama “up to and including impeachment.” Franks joins former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, American Family Radio Network talk show host Bryan Fischer, ACORN expert Matthew Vadum, and others who find the president’s selective defense or enforcement of marriage law to rise to the level of impeachment. Several other prominent figures, including former Congressman and presidential hopeful Tom Tancredo, have called for impeachment on other grounds. Franks, who represents Arizona’s second Congressional district, is chairman of the Constitution subcommittee and an outspoken critic of Obama’s weak immigration policies. Is Soros Scared of Impeachment? ThinkProgress intended this as a hit piece to demonstrate how radical the Republican Congress has become. This venue is significant. ThinkProgress describes itself as “a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.” The Center for American Progress (CAP) received significant start-up money from George Soros. Time magazine

called CAP “Obama’s idea factory.” In addition to being the current employer of Van Jones, CAP is the chief power in D.C. calling for Obama to rule purely through executive powers. CAP staffer Sarah Rosen Wartell compiled a report for the Center last fall entitled “The Power of the President: Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change.” The paper called on Barack Obama to ignore the will of the people, bypass Congress, and implement a left-wing agenda. (This author first revealed Obama’s decision to rule by executive order last October 8 in his article, “Obama Considering Rule by Executive Order in 2011.”) The fact that George Soros’ bloggers are responding to the impeach Obama campaign means something: the big boys have taken notice. For the first time since he was sworn in, the power behind the throne knows Obama’s presidency is imperiled by the illegal policies and Constitutional violations they urged him to impose. The new Republican Congress has the power of oversight, and its leaders have every right to rein in this administration’s selective, politically (and often racially) discriminatory enforcement of the law. The key in Franks’ statement is the condition: “If

it could gain the collective support.” Every politician must know the American people not only support but demand this lawless administration be held accountable for its misdeeds through the Constitutional means our Founding Fathers left at the people’s disposal. They will never act unless they are pushed. Stand with us as we pressure Congress to do the right thing”.

Click here to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign.
http://floydreports.com/a-congressman-is-on-board-impeach-obama-over-doma/? utm_source=Floyd+Reports&utm_campaign=a16d9f7b6fFR_03_03_20113_3_2011&utm_medium=email

======================================================

Prominent Blog Puts Impeachment on the Table
Posted on February 23, 2011 by Ben Johnson

A well-trafficked right-leaning blog has raised the possibility of impeaching Barack Obama. Pajamas Media, one of the most prominent political blogs followed by Republican voters, raised the possibility on its blog, The PJ Tattler. In an entry posted today entitled “Democrats Gone Wild, Subverting Our Democracy,” contributor Bryan Preston writes: In the space of a few days, Democrats in Wisconsin and Indiana fled their state capitals rather than allow the democratic process to work. Now, President Obama is declaring a federal law unconstitutional rather than respect the fact that the democratic process has already worked.

The Constitution is not silent on President Obama’s actions. Article II, Section I spells out the presidential oath of office: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Barack H. Obama took that oath — twice — on January 20, 2009. Article II, Section III is clear on the president’s relationship to US law. [The president] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed There’s nothing in there about the president faithfully executing only the laws with which he agrees. It says nothing about the president or his attorney general being vested with the power of judicial review. That power belongs to the courts. This president and his party have gone over the cliff into lawlessness. At this point, I wouldn’t put impeachment off the table for discussion. The president is intentionally stoking a constitutional crisis, while his party fosters anarchy in the states. These acts cannot stand. Preston’s grounds largely echo those made by Floyd Brown‘s Impeach Obama Campaign and expounded on this website. The constitutional implications of the president’s stoking of the uprisings in Wisconsin and Indiana, which featured their Democratic legislators’ exodus from their respective states, gives even liberal writers pause. More troubling is Barack Obama’s selective, often race-based enforcement of the law and his dedication to side-stepping the usual means of legislation to implement his agenda. As conservatives, Republicans, and independents of all persuasions are beginning to discover, this administration is, in the words of Rush Limbaugh, “increasingly lawless.”

Preston’s writing of impeachment signals its growing mainstream acceptance. Preston is the former producer of the Laura Ingraham Show and the former Communications Director of the Texas Republican Party. Pajamas Media is no extreme right-wing publication. Although J. Christian Adams exposed the Justice Department’s corruption in the Black Panther case, the blog’s political line is in many respects not-at-all conservative. Its “Chicago editor,” Rick Moran, raked Glenn Beck and others over the coals for their alleged “paranoia.” The conservatives’ offense? Citing the Cloward-Piven Strategy, believing Obama follows Saul Alinsky (whose tactics he studied, then taught as a community organizer), and holding “the wrongheaded belief that one’s political opponent harbors evil intent toward the nation.” Pajamas Media CEO Roger Simon called Andrew Breitbart’s party to welcome GOProud to CPAC 2011 Breitbart’s “proudest hour,” because it “will open up a whole new constituency for the GOP.” GOProud supports open homosexuality in the military, a policy that a Military Times poll found would cause 24 percent of enlisted men to leave the military or consider leaving. A frequent contributor, the very confused Ruben Navarrette Jr., insists Obama is “playing Hispanics on immigration”; Arizona Governor Jan Brewer is exploiting violence to sign a “vindictive, illconceived, and hypocritical” immigration law that “all but requires” racial profiling; enforcing our borders is an “inanity”; Lou Dobbs is a hypocrite; and the GOP will (he hopes) push for amnesty for illegal immigrants. It is more Ken Mehlman than Glenn Beck or Joseph Farah. Calls for impeachment have intensified in recent months from all sides of the political spectrum. Radio talk show host Tammy Bruce called for impeachment in four separate tweets, which she posted on her Twitter

feed on February 1st. She argued the president’s role in bringing the Muslim Brotherhood to power in Egypt merited an inquiry. Last November, Arizona state senator Russell Pearce, the author of the state’s illegal immigration enforcement law, listed Obama’s decision to outsource his legal war against Arizona to foreign nations as “impeachable.” Richard Nixon’s former head of the Office of Economic Opportunity and three-time presidential candidate Howard Phillips concurred. A month earlier, Michigan Congressman Tim Walberg told his constituents Republicans must confront Obama “up to and including impeachment.” These amplify the words of writers and ordinary citizens from all across the country, both on the Right and the Left. Although stopping short of calling for impeachment, Andrew McCarthy of National Review joined our call to investigate Eric Holder’s racist Justice Department. Other prominent conservatives have discovered various Obama outrages from this website/author. Fox News/Fox Business anchor Neil Cavuto ran two segments about Barack Obama’s report to the UN Human Rights Council called card check unionization a fundamental human right, and that the stimulus bill paid for microchips to monitor trash bins in Dayton, Ohio. (For a list of the top stories we broke in 2010, click here.) This is simply more evidence: If you want to know where the conservative movement is going tomorrow, read this website today. Please support our work and help us spread our message by forwarding our articles to your friends.

Click here to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign.

http://floydreports.com/prominent-blog-puts-impeachment-on-the-table/

======================================================

Conservative ACORN Expert Endorses Impeachment
Posted on February 25, 2011 by Ben Johnson

Just days after a writer for the prominent blog Pajamas Media wrote that he “wouldn’t put impeachment off the table,” another highly exposed conservative has called for Barack Obama’s impeachment. Matthew Vadum of the Capital Research Center wrote on his Twitter account Thursday, “So many reasons to impeach Obama,

now he gives us a new one: DOMA. Like it or not it is the law of the land.” Vadum linked to an article at The American
Spectator written by Ben Stein entitled, “A Major Constitutional Coup Going on Here,” which discusses Barack Obama’s decision not to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). In

presidential history, such a dereliction rare.

of duty has been exceedingly

Vadum writes for a number of conservative publications, including TAS, and is an acknowledged expert on ACORN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=cKyGx_prgKc&feature=player_embedded
Vadum is the second nationally known conservative to call for the president’s impeachment via Twitter. Radio talk show host Tammy Bruce called for Obama’s impeachment in four separate tweets, which she posted on her Twitter feed on February 1. Others have taken a more conventional approach. Arizona legislator Russell Pearce and Constitution Party founder Howard Phillips have said the president’s actions are “impeachable” in public venues. Vadum is correct that there are many grounds for the president’s impeachment and removal from office under the U.S. Constitution. Tammy Bruce cited the president’s role in bringing the Muslim

Brotherhood to power in Egypt, while Pearce and Phillips made reference to the president’s refusal to enforce immigration policy. Obama’s refusal to defend DOMA continues a string of selective enforcement of the law. The DOMA abdication came two years after offering legal arguments so weak and contradictory they were widely regarded as sabotage. Then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan essentially threw the case, as the administration did its “defense” of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. The damage done, Congress must now decide whether to do the president’s constitutional duty and offer the most robust legal rationale possible. Or perhaps it will be up to President Joe Biden.
Click here to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign.

====================================================

Arizona Legislator Calls Obama’s Actions “Impeachable”
Posted on November 30, 2010 by Guest Writer

The campaign to impeach Barack Obama has a distinguished new advocate: Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, who authored Arizona’s immigration law S.B. 1070. During a speech on November 19, Pearce told an audience: Think about it. This is the first time in the history of the United States that a sitting president has sided with a foreign government to sue the citizens of its country. For defending our laws? For defending and protecting the citizens of the state of Arizona? It’s outrageous, and it’s impeachable.

Senator Pearce was referring to the Obama administration’s decision to invite 11 Central and South American nations to join the federal government’s lawsuit against Arizona. This outsourcing ignores the president’s numerous lawsuits against the state, as well as motions against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for “racial profiling,” on the grounds he arrested too many Hispanics near our open border with Mexico. The lawsuit was perhaps the least offensive or forceful measure the president has taken against the will of his own citizens. The Obama administration hauled Arizona before the UN Human Rights Council after it passed Pearce’s bill. After Governor Jan Brewer learned about Obama’s outrage from this reporter, she sent a letter demanding Hillary Clinton strike the reference from the UNHRC report. Hillary refused. In September, a UN committee issued a thinly veiled denunciation of Arizonans as “xenophobes and racists.” Then Obama allowed human rights violators to humiliate the United States in the Geneva forum while appointing milquetoast globalists like “transnationalist” Harold Koh to “defend” America. His efforts to enlist foreign nations and the UN to overturn state policies with which he disagrees is indeed unconstitutional, and one of many grounds for impeachment. This author is pleased to have perhaps the best state senator in the United States voicing such truths, especially to those who are hostile to them. http://floydreports.com/arizona-legislator-calls-obamas-actionsimpeachable/

==================================================================================

Talk Show Host:

Obama Could be

Impeached over Egypt

Posted on February 2, 2011 by Ben Johnson

A nationally syndicated radio talk show host has called for Barack Obama to be impeached if he is secretly pushing Egypt to become an Islamist country ruled by the Muslim Brotherhood. Tammy Bruce called for Rep. Darrell Issa to investigate whether the Obama administration is helping the radical Islamic fundamentalist organization rise to power after the departure of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Media reports indicate a member of the Obama administration has met with the Muslim Brotherhood, and the United

States may have supported a plan to take down Mubarak since at least 2008. “If it is found that Obama secretly facilitated or *encouraged* an Islamist takeover of Egypt, an ally, he should be impeached,” Bruce wrote. Her call came in the form of four separate tweets, which she posted on her Twitter feed this afternoon:
•

•

•

•

“If it is found that Obama secretly facilitated or *encouraged* an Islamist takeover of Egypt, an ally, he should be impeached.” “Impeachment? We have a President in up to his elbows in an Islamist takeover of Egypt while he ignores a Fed Judge order to void ObamaCare” “The House impeaches–if there are grounds it should be done. @DarrellIssa needs to *immediately* determine Obama’s involvement w Egypt” “@DocBruceP It’s more than *losing* Egypt, if Obama *facilitated* the overthrow of an ally in favor of our *enemy* that’s impeachment”

A Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt could have widespread and devastating effects throughout the Middle East and around the world. A leading member of the Brotherhood, Muhammad Ghannem, reportedly told the Iranian television channel Al-Alam that Egyptians should prepare for war with Israel. He added activists should close down the

Suez Canal, which carries eight percent of the world’s seaborne trade. The investment bank Barclays Capital has estimated closing Suez would remove 2-3 million barrels of oil daily. Gas prices have already crept up with news of the unrest, but they are nowhere near what they could be following a third Suez crisis. Two previous Suez closings threw the world into turmoil in the 1956-57 and 1967. If the president is involved in promoting this agenda in any way, Congress may deem this an impeachable offense. In response to Tammy Bruce’s tweets, the George Soros-funded Media Matters quickly labeled her a “Right-Wing Radio Host.” Anyone familiar with Tammy knows how ridiculous this characterization is. Bruce describes herself as “a gay, pro-choice, gun owning, pro-death penalty, Tea Party Independent Conservative.” She was the youngestever president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) and served on its national board of directors. A registered Democrat until 2008, she currently chairs the Advisory Committee of GOProud. Needless to say, she is anything but a party-line ideologue.
Her radio show, “The Tammy Bruce Show,” airs on weekdays from 2-4 p.m. EST.

http://floydreports.com/talk-show-host-obama-could-be-impeached-over-egypt/

=================================================================================

IMPEACH OBAMA! STOP WASTING YOUR TIME

By: Devvy October 26, 2010 © 2010 - NewsWithViews.com

"It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime." ~Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason From the moment Obama/Soetoro was sworn into office, Americans galvanized into Impeach Obama Now! factions.

However, there is a problem here because two wrongs don't make a right, which is why I have not supported any petitions calling for impeachment. Despite the continued protestations by Obama/Soetoro supporters and professional liars in the dominant media, there is no question the usurper camped out in the White House was never eligible to run for president of these united States of America. All the huffing, puffing, vile name calling and protesting does not and cannot alter the legal fact that Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship. It is his father's citizenship status at the time Obama/Soetoro was born that clearly makes him ineligible to be president. We're all aware of the 40 or so lawsuits filed to expose Obama/Soetoro's perfidy and the decisions rendered by cowardly federal judges using the cop out - "standing" - as their justification in tossing the lawsuits. We're all aware that even though tens of thousands of Americans demanded the electoral college not certify the vote for the impostor on the ballot, they also proved to be gutless cowards or political hacks who value party loyalty over the U.S. Constitution. The final stop on the way to certifying an ineligible candidate was the U.S. Congress who sat on their cowardly backsides, January 9, 2009, knowing full well there were millions of Americans questioning the legitimacy of Obama/Soetoro's eligibility. Yet, not a single member of Congress (and that includes Ron Paul) stood up on the floor and objected. There is an orderly procedure that could have been triggered had one member of the Outlaw Congress stood up.[1] Instead, they all stood down and here we are today with a constitutional crisis that is not going away.

As Obama/Soetoro clearly was never eligible to run for the presidency, once he "took" office, he legally became a usurper. That action is defined as: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right: The pretender tried to usurp the throne. Now, we either believe in the supreme law of the land or we pursue an alternative path that sets a horrible legal precedent. What do I mean by that? You cannot impeach a usurper. To do so (even if the House were to file charges) would be to give legitimacy to Obama/Soetoro holding the office of president. That already happened once in our history with Chester Arthur. We cannot allow it to happen again no matter how frustrated and enraged we are about the actions of that empty suit sullying the people's house. To give legitimacy to his presidency would cement all the bills he signed into law as if they were valid under the U.S. Constitution. We also have to look at reality. Nutty Nancy Pelosi made it quite clear when the Democrats took control of the Outlaw Congress there would be no impeachment against George Bush, Jr. He was worth far more political currency to the morally and ethically bankrupt Democratic Party than removing him. The Republican Party is expected to gain more than enough seats in the house in the upcoming election. Congressman Darrell Issa [R-CA] has made it clear there will be no impeachment proceeding: Issa: 'Not a chance' of Obama impeachment under GOP House October 22, 2010

"If Republicans take control of the House, there is "not a chance at this point" that they will try to impeach President Obama, a top Republican lawmaker said this week. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who would helm the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if the GOP wins on Election Day, said that his party will not try to bring impeachment charges simply because it disagrees with the president....Look, disagreeing with the president — the president using his authority, maybe even misusing it — that's not what impeachment's for," he added. "Do we have disagreements? Yes. Do we want to see that the president strictly adheres to process? Yes." I'm not going to rehash all the unconstitutional bills Obama/Soetoro has signed since he was unlawfully sworn into office. One should remember the only way a bill gets to a president's desk is from the Outlaw Congress. That's where the treachery begins. Having said that, without question, the entire nation is shuddering under the weight of Obama/Soetoro's communitarian beliefs and actions. Everyday is a new attack on freedom and liberty spear headed by the usurper. As I have said for quite some time, I firmly believe there is no way Obama/Soetoro will run in 2012. Certainly, continuing to raise the specter of another Obama/Soetoro term is good for ratings on Hannity, O'Reilly and conservative talk radio. It's also a good theme for dangerous, vile individuals like Newt Gingrich to raise money for their political organizations.

However, Obama/Soetoro's handlers (the shadow government) got away with fraud the first time around, they know it won't happen a second time. There's no way Obama/Soetoro can get ballot qualified in 2012 in a single state. Nancy Pelosi and others pulled off fraud with their candidate declarations to the 50 states of the Union in 2008, but they won't get away with it a second time. Pelosi and her gang of coconspirators should also be indicted by a federal grand jury. Don't think it can't happen. There are many very smart, dedicated individuals working to see all who participated in putting Obama/Soetoro on states ballots are brought to justice. How this will all play out, I don't know. Obama/Soetoro has admitted to cocaine use; Larry Sinclair has accused him of being a user as late as 1999. Wayne Madsen recently penned a piece outlining how there is a crisis underway in the White House:

Wayne Madsen: White House in Crisis
Section 4 of the 25th Amendment likely to be invoked;

Obama being shipped out!
"Washington has not witnessed so much top level White House intrigue since October 20, 1973, when a Saturday night saw President Nixon fire the Watergate independent counsel, the U.S. attorney general, and the deputy attorney general in the “Saturday Night Massacre.” Just ten days earlier, Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned after being charged with accepting bribes while governor of Maryland.

"In the case of President Obama, the senior firings are not happening during a single night but the recent involuntary sudden departures of the White House chief of staff and national security adviser, along with what WMR can confirm from multiple sources is a president who is suffering from Nixonian levels of paranoia, depression, and schizophrenia, has some top-level administration officials considering the first-ever invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment — the involuntary removal of the president from office. The White House meltdown has the Washington political circuit buzzing under the surface. "Unlike Watergate and the Iran-contra scandal, however, the corporate media is refusing to report on the breakdown of the Obama administration and the internecine political warfare within the Executive Office of the President." Madsen is a serious investigative journalist with excellent sources. The usurper has had the citizenship issue hanging over his head since mid-2007. He and Militant Michelle have been partying in their White House digs like there's no tomorrow. Whenever there's some heat, Obama/Soetoro hops on his favorite toy, Air Force One, and either goes on another vacation, visiting foreign countries or is out campaigning for his party. Anything to duck sitting around looking incompetent. I believe the fake First Couple know they are a one trick fraud and are living it up while they have the American taxpayers' open checkbook at their disposal. Many pundits continue to remark how detached Obama/Soetoro seems and not really "into" the task of being president. I believe this reflects knowing he won't be

around for a second term. He does what he's told and while living it up in style. Should the usurper remain in office, there is no way he will get the nod at the Democratic National Convention. Take money to the bank on that. It won't happen. There's no way to salvage that shipwreck. Obama/Soetoro's handlers might try to keep him in office as long as possible - if to do nothing more than checkmate any legislation coming out of the "new" Congress in January 2011. You see, if the usurper's handlers throw him under the bus early, next in line is Joseph Biden, who I believe is in the early stages of dementia. Not a good choice for the global cabal running Washington, DC. But, let's put that aside for the moment. Is there any possibility that Obama/Soetoro can still be removed from office? Yes. There is still one case, Kerchner v Obama, which I have followed from the beginning. The wind has shifted direction since Leo Donofrio's first case was discussed at the Supreme Court level in December 2008. Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Kerchner, et al, is a real warrior and has fought for his clients in the aforementioned case. It has now gone to the next step: "Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed 30 Sep 2010 and docketed 04 Oct 2010 with the U.S. Supreme Court - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 18 & 11 Oct 2010 issues, page 5. U.S. Supreme Court Docket Number: 10-446. Response from defendants due to the U.S. Supreme Court by 3 Nov 2010."

Let me shift gears for a moment. There's an old saying: Timing in life is everything. HalfPastHuman is a web site that deals in predictive linguistics. Cliff has been pinpointing Nov 8 - 12 as a tipping point for events which could (I stress could) turn this country upside down. I've followed George Ure, Cliff, Bob Chapman and Gerald Celente for a long time. Quite frankly, it's scary how accurate their predictions are in real time. Let's look a few dates here to see what has my attention: Nov 2 -- National elections Nov 3 --- Federal Reserve Chairman, Helicopter Ben Bernanke, is expected to announce a new round of printing tons of worthless fiat currency which will, on cue, make the situation worse as far as the economy is concerned. Nov 4 -- Usurper, Obama/Soetoro leaves for India and other exotic locations. The original departure date was Nov 7, 2010. He is scheduled to return on Nov. 14th. An unusually long trip outside the U.S. for a president. Regardless of any "official" explanation as to why his departure date was moved up, I find it suspicious - as well as the length of time he is to be out of country. Nov 11 - 12 -- Next meeting of the G-20 group. Those geniuses are going to try to figure out how to reverse decades of unrestrained, irresponsible fiscal policies. Too late. This year elections may not be decided by five minutes after the polls close. We know electronic ballot fraud as well as scanners and human fraud will play a huge factor, again. I

am hopeful that candidates who allegedly lose -- either by a landslide or close margin - will challenge the vote. Having the outcome of some races (especially the senate) drag on for weeks or even months will have more negative impact for our country. Recall the circus over the 2008 election between incumbent Norm Coleman [R-MN] and a vulgar, completely unqualified candidate, Al Franken. That recount lasted 238 days - roughly seven months. It could happen in less than ten days in a half dozen senate races. Fair election results must trump expediency -- even if it means a joke like Franken gets into office. There's that Seventeenth Amendment argument again..... So.... The banking cartel is on the ropes with their money racket teetering on the brink, and with Foreclosure Gate now in full exposure, the problem is compounded by a factor of a few billion. The usurper is beating it out of the country three days earlier than originally scheduled and is staying out of the country for a lengthy time. One of the most important elections in our history is nine days away. The international banking boys are going to meet in an effort to see which end of the Titanic they should stand on before half the world goes down in economic flames. All these events clustered in a short period of time; Nov 2 12th. Just some food for thought.

Going back to the original theme of this column, besides impeachment, is there any other way to remove Obama/Soetoro? Yes, and it could have and should have been done more than a year ago. But, the requirements to qualify for under a Quo Warranto are stringent. Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon, both brilliant attorneys who have been involved in citizenship cases in the past, now represent roughly 82 Chrysler dealers in bankruptcy proceedings. The history is on Leo's web site. It does require some reading time if you haven't been able to keep up with it all. Leo and Stephen's first obligation to their clients is the bankruptcy lawsuit, but that does not rule out a Quo Warranto which could happen before 2012. [2] The Quo Warranto statute was specifically written to remove a usurper from office and that without question is Barack Hussein Obama. I know time is an issue for everyone as our beloved republic is under attack 24/7 by those who wish to destroy these united States of America. If you desire to fully understand the entire history behind natural born citizen, the Fourteenth Amendment as it relates to the usurper and quo warranto, I put it all together in one master file here. If you can't read it all at one time, book mark the link and get back to it because it is critical in understanding the fraud perpetrated by Obama/Soetoro and his coconspirators. Does this mean Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro should get away with his crimes even if he stays until the 2012 election? Absolutely not. He has always known, as well as others, that he was ineligible to run for the presidency because of his dual citizenship. In my mind, there is no question the

usurper is guilty under 18 U.S.C. §1343: wire fraud. Obama/Soetoro knowingly solicited campaign funds electronically (TV, radio, Internet) knowing full well his citizenship status made him ineligible. More than $600 million bux poured in and despite enough paper evidence to warrant a full investigation by the FEC regarding foreign contributions, they refuse. However, before the statute of limitations runs, the Department of Justice could indict Obama/Soetoro, and if convicted, he would spend decades in prison where he belongs. I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday and I'm not naive. At some point, all these holes in the dam will burst and the long arm of the law will go after Obama, just the same as justice should be done in bringing Bush to trial over his lying regarding the illegal invasion of Iraq; which is not a dead issue and that's all I can say about it at this time. Why are so many talented, decent Americans continuing the Herculean efforts to bring Bush and Obama/Soetoro to justice in a court of law? Because it is the right thing to do for our country. Every time we the people allow lawbreakers (like Marxist duo, Bill and Hillary) to get away with their crimes, the further our country slips into the muck of a banana republic. We cannot and must not allow that to happen. As badly as we all want the usurper removed from the White House, it will not happen via impeachment. That comes out of the mouth of a powerful Republican who will, barring some disaster or major vote fraud, return to Washington in January. We cannot allow our rage and frustration to set

another horrible legal precedent: you cannot impeach someone who has never legally held office. Usurper means that individual never occupied the office. We must stick to the correct legal remedy. Right now we need to concentrate our efforts on winning the major fights underway, i.e., getting ALL of the unconstitutional ObamaCare repealed; some provisions are also in the stimulus bill that was signed into law and those must also be repealed and stopped. I would also like to stress how critically important it is to boot out all state reps and state senators who refuse to uphold the U.S. Constitution, who have destroyed their state economies with their foolish legislation and their refusal to take the necessary steps to secure your state from financial disaster; see link below. Get prepared because the worst is about to slam this nation. The elections on November 2, 2010, will not bring some magic bullet relief. It's a long, hard road ahead.
Footnotes:
1- In the Shadow of Nemisis 2- Former Chrysler dealers fight back using the Quo Warranto Index of documents in package delivered to: Richard Durbin, Chief US Attorney for the North-Western, District of TX for Criminal Matters by Devvy on February 27, 2009, Austin, Texas

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd488.htm
===========

White House In Crisis-Posted on Before It’s News-By Wayne Madsen-On October
29, 2010:

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/216/574/Wayne_Madsen:_White_House_ in_Crisis.html
=================================================================================

'White House seeks to remove Obama'
Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:55AM

A US analyst says some officials in the White House and the administration are considering legal action to remove Barack Obama from presidency.
Watch video of interview @ http://www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html

"Right now, there is discussion in Washington and within the government of using the 25th amendment to the US Constitution to remove Obama from office,"
Edward Spannaus from Executive Intelligence Review said in an interview with Press TV on Friday. The amendment allows for removing the president if he/she has incapacity either physically or mentally.

"In this case, Obama is mentally incapable of fulfilling the office of president," Spannaus went on to say.
Referring to Obama's plummeting popularity, mostly due to the recent

economic collapse in the US, Spannaus said, "There

is no way that his presidency could be salvaged at this point and it does not really make any difference who wins the congressional elections." "He was not qualified to be the president in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British," Spannaus added.
A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more than half of American voters would not support the incumbent US president's reelection. A recent survey from Gallup has revealed that more

than half of American voters would not support the re-election of President Barack Obama.
ASH/HRF/MGH

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/147724.html
==================================================================================

'Obama unlikely to last his first term'
Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:46AM

A US analyst says US President Barack Obama is unlikely to end his first term as there are serious efforts by American officials to remove him due to his incompetence. Watch video of interview @

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/148446.html

"It is very doubtful at this time that he will last his first term," Edward Spannaus of Executive Intelligence Review said in an
interview with Press TV on Wednesday.

"There are people who are upset within the administration and the Democratic party who are seriously considering how to remove Obama from presidency," Spannaus added.

Many of them put out all their calls for removing Obama under the amendment 25th of the US Constitution.
The amendment allows for the removal of the US president if he is incapacitated either physically or mentally. Spannaus also opined that

people in the military are upset because Obama "is not attentive" to what is going on. "We have troops killing and being killed and he is not interested in dealing with it," he further explained.
Elsewhere in his remarks, Spannaus said

people inside the White House say, "Once he got into the White House he is very unhappy having to govern ... he is very

frustrated, he is very depressed, some reports say he is on medications and he cannot concentrate or focus, which is a mental problem." "It is the question of what he is going to do now in this term, the question of the second term is out of the question," he concluded.
According to a new Harris Interactive survey released on Tuesday, just over one-third or 37 percent of respondents have positive opinion about Obama, while about

67 percent of Americans disapprove Obama's performance on jobs and economy.
A recent opinion poll conducted by Gallup had previously revealed that

more than half of American voters would not support the re-election of Obama.
ASH/MB/HRF

‘Obama unlikely to last his first term’-Posted on Press TV-On October 27, 2010: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/148446.html
==================================================================================

Impeachment Fever!
• •

By Simon Dumenco (Email) Published Oct 24, 2010

GOPers expecting to take the House are already calling for numerous Whitewater-esque investigations into the Obama administration. Meanwhile, according to Public Policy Polling,

35 percent of Republicans would like to see President Obama impeached based solely on “his actions so far.” Which
actions, exactly? Well, there’s always something.

1. Sestakgate!
The White House offered Representative Joe Sestak a government gig to get him out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary. The most rabid proponents of digging into the affair: Sean Hannity (“An impeachable offense”), Glenn Beck (“An impeachable offense, a felony”), Dick Morris (“It’s Valerie Plame, only ten times bigger”).

2. Rezkogate!
Senate-era Obama fund-raiser Tony Rezko, a Chicago real-estate developer and convicted felon, was a recurring bête noire in the 2008 presidential campaign. The president hasn’t been accused of serious wrongdoing in the matter, but who knows what excuse for prosecution politically motived investigators will find? Monica Lewinsky turned up in a case that started with Arkansas real-estate deals.

3. Bordergate!
“Mr. Obama is a more serious threat to America than Al Qaeda,” because his failure to secure the southern border of the U.S. “constitutes an impeachable offense against the Constitution,” said former Colorado congressman Tom Tancredo.

4. Birthgate!
“The president hasn’t resolved [the birth-certificate issue] yet … The

fact of the matter is that he has an awful lot of power to keep from showing certain things unless the courts will stand up to him. Or unless Congress, in majority, will stand up—up to and including impeachment,” said Michigan congressional candidate Tim Walberg at a recent campaign appearance.

5. Health-Care Reformgate!
From a mailer sent out by the National Campaign for an Impeachment Inquiry, a project of the Conservative Caucus: “ObamaCare requires the states to pay for much of the program … [This] amounts to ‘commandeering’ the state legislatures for Federal purposes, which the Supreme Court has already ruled as unconstitutional  … ObamaCare will ultimately destroy freedom in America.”
http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/topic/69132/
=================================================================================

Video: Probable Cause to Impeach Obama-Posted on ExposeObama.comOn December 19, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/12/19/video-of-the-day-probablecause-to-impeach-obama/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=8f02243abaEO_12_19_201012_19_2010&utm_medium=email
================================================================================

Left-Wing Blog:

Should We Support Obama’s Impeachment?

Posted on November 23, 2010 by Ben Johnson

With Barack Obama’s crimes against liberty becoming increasingly brazen, calls for his impeachment have intensified. Although it is still rare to find support for impeachment on the Left, that trend may be changing. An entry at the far-Left blog Firedoglake.com openly questions whether “progressives” would be better off if impeachment hearings begin. The FDL entry asks:

Maybe we should help the Republicans impeach Obama?

Hang with me on this for a few minutes. Let me try to explain. I’m trying to think outside the box. I think everyone knows that Obama will be impeached in the House. I see some heads shaking, but trust me on this. There will be a vote to impeach Obama in the House. Floyd and Mary Beth Brown have reported on the likelihood that the new Congress will consider impeachment. Read their column here. The FDL entry notes, “Dems in the House fully expect

[impeachment] from the Republicans.” It continues:
“Impeach Obama for WHAT?” you ask. Hey, Dems are not running the show, so it doesn’t matter what impeachment is supposedly based on. I got a flyer from [T]he Conservative Caucus on pushing Congress on impeachment hearings and an eventual vote… You can read this author’s previous story about the 17-page impeachment package some 5,000 activists nationwide have received from the National Campaign for an Impeachment Inquiry, an undertaking of The Conservative Caucus (TCC) chaired by Howard Phillips. You can read the full text of the flyer here. The FDL entry says the flyer is proof “the energy and drive for Obama’s impeachment is certainly there on the Right” — and suggests that same passion should take root on the Left: OK. If all of the above is true, how does this help progressives? There is no way that impeachment gets past the Senate…But what if the Dems in the Senate decided to let Obama sweat during an impeachment trial? Could progressive in Congress ring concessions out of Obama for their votes during his impeachment trial? Would Obama renege on any

concessions to progressives during the heat of an impeachment trial? Could the possibility of an impeachment trial force Obama to change? In a novel approach, the blog suggests impeaching Obama as a form of left-wing blackmail: I bring all this up because I am frustrated as all of you are with Obama, and I am looking for any tool that will alter his behavior. The only thing that seems to do the trick with Obama is power…Maybe letting Obama’s enemies give him a near death experience might force Obama to capitulate to progressives? This entry is another in the explosion of media talk about, or calls for, impeaching Barack Hussein Obama. The interesting aspect of this call for impeachment from the Left is its innovative reasoning. It shows a growing chorus of Americans favor impeaching Barack Obama, albeit for conflicting reasons. As I have noted on this website, Democrats interested in maintaining their political viability have many reasons to want to be free of ObamAlbatross. The Huffington Post has noted 2012 could be worse for Democrats than 2010 if an unpopular president heads the ticket. A recent Associated Press-Knowledge Networks poll found that 47 percent of Democrats and 29 percent of 2008 Obama supporters “said

Obama should be challenged for the 2012 nomination” — a move that would virtually guarantee his defeat. Democratic
insiders have begun a whisper campaign that Obama is becoming unhinged under the pressure of the office. And a Washington Post op-ed by two Democratic pollsters advising Obama not to run in 2012 touched off far more speculation than it should have for a politically healthy incumbent.

Although two years is a political eternity, Obama’s popularity seems likely to decline rather than rise. His closest insiders have noted he will not triangulate as Bill Clinton did. George Soros is threatening to dry up all money to Obama if he does not maintain a far-Left agenda. And the

president is thankful for the left-wing cover to implement his extremist ideology through executive orders, regulations, federal fiats, and decrees.
This entry lends additional credence to this author’s contention that if Republicans muster the courage to impeach Obama, “a few Democrats might secretly support them, as well.” Left-Wing Blog: Should We Support Obama’s Impeachment?-Posted on Floyd
Reports-By Ben Johnson-On November 23, 2010:

http://floydreports.com/left-wing-blog-should-we-support-obamasimpeachment/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=cf6ec0e14eEO_11_23_201011_23_2010&utm_medium=email

==================================================================================

-

The New Congress Will Consider Impeachment
Posted on September 17, 2010 by Floyd Brown

The new Congress elected in November will surprise everyone. They will

seriously consider impeaching Barack Obama. Growing under the radar of the mainstream media is a movement that is gathering momentum.

More than one million citizens have signed petitions calling on the U.S. Congress to impeach Barack

Hussein Obama. Some of the soon-to-be-elected members of Congress are amongst those who have signed up, and they are not about to be cowered by establishment
Republicans scared silly of the issue. Ultimately, it comes down to a commonly shared belief amongst Tea Party activists that Barack Obama is systematically trying to hurt America. Obama, the argument goes, is not an incompetent boob in over his head. Nor is he is not some well-meaning community organizer who has seen his plans go astray. Barack Obama is a dishonest, manipulative liar who actually is pursuing an agenda that he hopes will take America off the international leadership stage. He wants America to fail so that the vision of internationalist socialists can be realized. America is hated by the elite intellectuals of the world because we have been the single biggest roadblock to their plans to establish a one world governing system with them in charge. Americans has consistently rejected socialism. Whether it is Hillarycare or Obamacare, Americans are speaking with a loud, clear voice against socialism. The Left hates America because of our belief in God, our belief in rugged individualism, our belief in private property, and our belief in the right to keep and bear arms. It is only through impeachment that the new Congress can send Barack Obama a clear and unambiguous message that he does not have carte blanche to run roughshod over America.

Impeachment is the political tool given by the Founders to correct abuse by a president. Impeachment is often misunderstood because of confusion about what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense. Former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English common law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. “High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior. Here’s a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution: “High crimes and misdemeanors” entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other “great and dangerous offenses” might not be covered… so Mason then proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a “misdemeanor” meant “mis-demeanor,” or bad behavior.

In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a criminal act, as some would lead you to believe. Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which are gross incompetence, gross negligence, outright distasteful, or in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show “malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.” And for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting president be a political act. The Founding Fathers deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment. The Obama administration qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history. Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this. Click here to sign the petition to impeach Obama now. Our nation depends on it. http://floydreports.com/the-new-congress-will-consider-impeachment/

=================================================================================

Impeachment is in the Mail
Posted on October 15, 2010 by Ben Johnson

Conservatives have long been waiting for impeachment to come to Capitol Hill. Soon, it will come to their mailboxes. Constitutional conservatives around the country will soon receive a 17page package from the National Campaign for an Impeachment Inquiry, an undertaking of The Conservative Caucus (TCC). The conservative watchdog organization bills the mailing a “national ballot of 5,000,000 registered voters” on “Whether Congress Should Launch An Impeachment Inquiry Into President Barack Hussein Obama’s Assault On Our Constitution.” It will include a survey and “Special Report” asking recipients to note whether they agree with each reason the report offers. The left-wing Talking Points Memo announced the letter on its website today.

Founded in 1974, TCC is chaired by Howard Phillips. Phillips initiated impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton in 1994 – a full four years before Congressional Republicans got around to it. Now, he is turning his sights on Barack Obama. The ballot begins: The purpose of this survey of 5,000,000 registered voters is to show profreedom, pro-Constitutional members of Congress that there is broad public support for the new Congress to conduct a full Inquiry into whether President Barack Hussein Obama has kept his oath of office to faithfully “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.” If this inquiry concludes that he has not, Impeachment proceedings would then begin. Those who receive the survey will get to answer, point blank: “Do you think the new Congress should immediately launch an Impeachment Inquiry into whether or not President Obama has faithfully protected and defended the Constitution of the United States, as required by his oath of office?” The package reviews the Obama administration’s shameless and pervasive violation of the U.S. Constitution and its desire to remake our form of government. Rahm Emanuel vowed never to “let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things you couldn’t do before.” The report continues, “Now we know what Rahm Emanuel meant by that statement. He meant that the Obama Administration planned to use the economic recession to permanently and fundamentally transform America.”

The nationalization of the health care industry is the most significant step taken to that end in a generation. Phillips shows that the bill is unconstitutional on several grounds, beginning with the mandate that Americans purchase health care insurance. He quotes a judgment the Congressional Budget Office made about HillaryCare in 1994: “A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of Federal action.” Then he quotes Judge Andrew Napolitano, who found the act unconstitutional because it commandeers the state legislatures, forcing them to pay for ObamaCare and regulate their internal state markets. The fraudulent accounting employed in ObamaCare and its establishment of 159 new government agencies – none authorized by the U.S. Constitution – give readers a panoply of reasons to reject the bill’s legality. Both the executive and the legislative branches share responsibility for passing government-run health care – a bill that a strict constructionist court would strike down. However, the president alone bears responsibility for enforcing the law, something Phillips proves Obama willingly fails to do. In a section entitled “Obama Refuses to Enforce Laws He Does Not Like,” Phillips specifically mentions the president’s unilateral decision to waive accountability for labor unions. The law requires organized labor to itemize its expenditures and report conflicts of interest, but Obama – who is deeply indebted to Big Labor – has excused its fat cat leaders from doing so. This section alone could fill a book. President Obama similarly fails to apply voter intimidation laws against the New Black Panther Party, federal deportation laws against illegal immigrants (including his Kenyan aunt), federal guidelines about mailing ballots to military voters to a number of states, requirements to purge the dead from the voting rolls nationally, and the U.S. Constitution to virtually any bill he has

ever signed, endorsed, or proposed. Officials in his home state even look the other way when the first lady, Michelle Obama, openly violates state campaign laws by flagrantly electioneering inside a polling place. A number of other reasons are given – although at 17 pages, the list seems merely the tip of an iceberg. These include President Obama’s plan to “seize more than 10 million acres of oil and natural gas-rich land in the Western United States by placing it under the ‘protection’ of the Department of the Interior.” (Phillips speculates this may be “the first step in an Obama plan to build a massive government-owned and operated oil and natural gas company.” Perhaps, but this author would have a hard time seeing Obama drill anywhere.) The survey asks recipients if they agree or disagree with each aspect of the report in detail. Obama’s view that the U.S. Constitution “represents the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.” He has institutionalized his constitutional philosophy in the activist justices he has nominated for the Supreme Court. This reference is the key strength of the TCC report. The Constitution is the charter of our national government, and it empowers the Congress to impeach any president who refuses to abide by its limitations. Any president who steps outside its well-defined boundaries is a legitimate target for impeachment. No statutory criminal violations are necessary; if the president violates the Constitution, the Constitution enables the people, through their elected officials, to remove him from office. No one makes this point better than Phillips, a three-time presidential candidate for the Constitution Party (formerly the U.S. Taxpayers Party). Phillips resigned the Nixon administration after Nixon promised to shut down the Office of Economic Opportunity, which Phillips headed. Long before others discovered the free-flowing spigot of federal

largesse into left-wing groups like ACORN and La Raza, Phillips was fighting the good fight to end this – and all – unconstitutional spending. He has testified not only against the nomination of Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court, but also David Souter – and the nation would have been better off had the Senate listened either time. Today, he continues his educational and political efforts. Additionally, his television program Conservative Roundtable is available in 32 states and on by demand on YouTube. Phillips writes that this mailing will be the first of one million “Voter Education Letters per month to explain why an Impeachment Inquiry is needed and showing voters how to pressure their elected representatives in Congress to launch an immediate Impeachment Inquiry.” The reason, he explains, is clear: politicians need to feel the fire. He acknowledges “even a conservative Congressional majority will be reluctant to begin impeachment proceedings without overwhelming public support. That’s why we must begin now to educate voters and build public pressure on Congress to begin Impeachment proceedings.” That’s what Floyd Brown has said for years. That’s why he launched the website ImpeachObamaCampaign.com. Some did – and some still do – deride the notion of impeaching a commander-in-chief who is manifestly hostile to the constitution of the United States. In the opening months of Obama’s presidency – believing they had seen a political realignment against traditional conservatism – they counseled conservatives to shut up and be grateful the president had appointed “moderates”…like Hillary Clinton. Others, like Howard Phillips and Floyd Brown, were not so blind, unscrupulous, or opportunistic.

In the intervening 22 months, Barack Obama’s criminality and disregard for the American form of government have become undeniable to virtually everyone. Together, a growing chorus of conservatives, Tea Party patriots, and constitutionalists are calling for someone to finally face the consequences of violating the charter our Founding Fathers sacrificed so much to give to us and our posterity. Our campaign is succeeding. Rep. Darrell Issa plans a flurry of investigations in the new Congress. Even Jonathan Chait of The New Republic agrees; the Republican Party will eventually impeach Barack Obama. Conservatives, constitutionalists, and patriots – it is up to us to keep the pressure on. Watch your mail for the National Campaign for an Impeachment Inquiry. If you cannot wait to receive TCC’s survey in the mail, sign the Impeach Obama Petition. Better yet, do both. America’s permanent “transformation” may hang in the balance.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2010/10/obamaimpeachment-mailer.php?page=1
http://floydreports.com/impeachment-is-in-the-mail/
================================================================================

Media Explode with Talk of

Impeachment
Posted on November 5, 2010 by Ben Johnson

Suddenly, as if they realize the president’s crimes against liberty have become too well known, the media have exploded with reports of Obama’s impending impeachment. The Daily Caller has a piece stating, “Liberals Worry GOP Will Attempt to Impeach Obama.” The Christian Science Monitor asks, “Will Republicans Now Impeach Obama? (Is That a Serious Question?)” Last month, Jonathan Chait of The New Republic has written, “If Republicans win and maintain control of the House of Representatives, they are going to impeach President Obama.” On Thursday, Politico’s Josh Gerstein sent the White House a message in an article entitled, “Memo to Obama: Lawyer Up.” (The Washington Times responded with the editorial: “Memo to Obama: Don’t Lawyer Up”; George Soros’ boys at Media Matters objected only to the Times.) The Wall Street Journal piled on with a blog entry advising, “Lawyer Up, Mr. President, Here Come the Subpoenas.” The Hill newspaper reports that the GOP is likely to tell the Obama administration not to shred any documents, which it will subpoena next year. The undisputed leader of the conservative movement, Rush Limbaugh, is cheering the development. On his radio program on Friday, Rush said, “Subpoena power – that’s where Republicans have a goldmine.” International evangelist and WorldNetDaily commentator Hal Lindsey dedicated the headlines on Thursday to whether Obama would be impeached. Liberals are predictably apoplectic over the possibility. MSNBC’s Ed Schultz, who has spent his envious life imitating Rush or savaging him, warned, “House Republicans… might go so far as to try to impeach President Obama.” Earlier this week, Sgt. Schultz demanded the

incoming Republican leadership foreswear any attempt at impeachment: Four years ago, in the midst of an avalanche of criticism of the Bush administration, Nancy Pelosi took impeachment off the table. I want to ask Mr. Boehner tonight, are you going to take impeachment off the table? Or are we going to go down this road of divide, are we going to go down this road of investigations? After facing criticism, Schultz said he got he first learned of the possibility from longtime Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-SC, who warned the Republican Congress would investigate Barack Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility. The media are busy reassuring themselves that, not only will Barack Obama not be impeached, but he will coast to re-election in 2012. Journalists inform their readers that political scientists agree impeachment is not coming. The oft-quoted Larry Sabato called the idea “ridiculous,” adding it “would backfire badly, just as it did in 1998.” John Hart, professor of communication at Hawaii Pacific University, derided such talk as a “kind of flight of fancy.” Some Republicans, too, have sought to ingratiate themselves with the media and the liberals (but then I repeat myself). House Minority Leader John Boehner has told The Daily Caller, “We have no plans to [impeach] the president.” Rep. Darrell Issa, while signaling he will press forward with the investigations he has already launched, has stated there is “not a chance at this point” he would impeach the president. Issa has gone far enough to say, “My job is to make the president a success.”

But not everyone is on the same page. Congressman Lamar Smith will hold one of the chief investigative chairmanships in the House, made no effort to reassure jittery journalists in his home state of Texas: One thing that Democrats openly expressed their concern about is the ability of Republicans like Smith, chairmen of key House committees, to use the Majority’s subpoena power to compel testimony on a whole host of issues. Smith says their concerns were justified. Rep. Lamar Smith, the next chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, told 1200 WOAI: “There are going to be a number of investigations or oversight committee actions, trying to get to the facts,” he promised. On the contrary, Smith said, he is going to hold the administration accountable. “Right now, because of the one party

monopoly, the administration has been able to dodge any kind of supervision, any kind of oversight committee action, and they refuse to testify, and that is no longer acceptable,” he said.
Smith wrote in an e-mail to Politico: “Oversight is not a game of cat and mouse between Congress and the White House as the media often paints it. Oversight is the legitimate and necessary work of Congress to improve the operation and function of the executive branch and ensure that federal agencies are operating in the best interests of the American people.” The media have observed Smith is from southern Texas and may investigate the Obama administration over a host of issues, including its dismissal of the Black Panther voter intimidation case and its refusal to

secure the border. Smith’s comments seemed to allude to this: “I am committed to working with the Justice Department to ensure that our laws are equally enforced, criminals are prosecuted, and American communities are kept safe.” Politico added that Ron Paul may press forward with a series of investigations as chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy. Smith’s words, or a guilty conscience, seem to have gotten the best of House Democrats. They have responded by calling on the Republican Party to unimpeach President Clinton. Rep. Chaka Fattah, D-PA, says he will introduce a resolution on November 15, the first day of the lame duck session, to “disavow” the Clinton impeachment. This, he says, will help the parties “enter a period in which bipartisanship will be a major priority for the Congress.” Given the increasing number of Democrats who want Obama removed from their party’s leadership, impeachment might secretly be a bipartisan desire. Of course, the Democrats are unlikely to remove Obama from his post, as much as they understand he is an arrogant, electoral albatross. Despite his evident guilt, they circled the wagons around Bill Clinton. But Barack Obama is not Bill Clinton; his crimes are more flagrant and fundamental. And although he remains personally popular with some segments of society, his numbers are slipping by the day. Impeachment was a political loser against Bill Clinton, because he was popular; it may be a winner against Obama, because he is increasingly seen as a pariah. With all this concern about impeachment sounding on the Left, it begs the question: Do they know something?

http://floydreports.com/media-explode-with-talk-of-impeachment/

================================================================================ Posted on July 26, 2010 by Guest Writer

laws-not-lies
by Michael Oberndorf, Floyd Reports Contributor

As support for impeaching Barak Hussein Obama grows, there is a great deal of discussion of the grounds that can be cited for impeachment. One offense that should be highlighted early on is his unceasing lying to the American people. As it relates to him as “president”, it began during his campaign, when he was out to get people to vote for him. He had no problem contradicting himself, if he thought the particular group he was speaking to at the moment wanted to hear something different than what he had told a different group the other day. This happened with such regularity – and the “mainstream media”, more accurately called the Democrat Propaganda Ministry, never called him on these flip-flop lies – that to list them would fill a book. However, he lied about a number of fundamental policy stances that have, and/or will cause severe damage to our free, democratic republican form of government, our economy, and our national security. One of his big lies was that His Administration would be totally transparent. Nothing could have been further from the truth. No posting bills for five days before they are voted on, no press conferences where he is directly questioned – even by the lapdogs in the Propaganda Ministry, no serious ethics investigations, just photo ops and a torrent of self-aggrandizing speeches, full of more lies. Massive bills, thousands of pages long, have been whipped through congress, often voted on in the dead of night, containing so much, that even the Democrats don’t know what’s in them. Another huge lie was that taxes would never be raised on the middle class. Aside from the fact that he and his unindicted co-conspirators in the Democrat Party, and their running-dog Republican allies, have just about destroyed the middle class, we are about to experience tax increases on a scale the world has never seen before. Not only will the Bush tax cuts be allowed to die, there are oppressive new taxes in just

about every major “reform” bill these fascists have rammed through Congress. The latest from Obama’s “dept commission” suggests they will recommend tax hikes that could reach over $26 trillion – that’s $26,000,000,000,000.00. And I ga-ron-tee, Obama will approve them. With so many big lies to choose from, it is difficult to single out one as the Biggest. However, I think my vote has to go to the one he told when he put his hand on the Bible (by the way, he only calls it the Bible, but he always says, “Holy Qoran”) and swore, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” The Moron in Chief had difficulty repeating this simple sentence correctly, apparently because he had no intention of honoring it. Article II, Section 3 of said constitution says, and I indeed have the temerity to quote it, “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…” Which brings us to illegal immigration, Arizona, sanctuary cities, and the New Black Panther Party. What part of “illegal” do the Usurper and his fellow criminals in the “Justice” Department not understand? What part of “illegal” do the Democrats running sanctuary cities not understand? Eric Holder, Obama’s alterego/Step’n’fetchit running the DoJ, is attacking Arizona for enforcing the federal laws that the Federal Government won’t, is not attacking sanctuary cities for not enforcing federal laws, and refuses to prosecute a pair of racist New Black Panther Party thugs for voter intimidation, because the thugs are black, and the voters they threatened were white. “…he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…”? If this ain’t a middle finger in the face of the Constitution and the American people, I don’t know what is.

There’s lots more: turning the oil spill from problem to unmitigated disaster for political purposes by blocking recovery efforts; the bribery in the Sestak and Romanoff job offers; Interior Secretary Salazar’s blatant act of fraud with the drilling expert’s signatures; Labor Secretary Solis’ blatant solicitation of criminal acts form people already guilty of criminal acts; he lied about his relationship with impeached and indicted Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich; he lied about his relationship with Chicago mobster, Tony Rezko; he lied about his relationship with unrepentant Marxist terrorist, Bill Ayers, etcetera, etcetera, ad nauseam. And a growing number of people believe he lied about being a natural born American citizen, a basic qualification for being president in the first place. If there ever was someone holding a political office who needed impeaching, it‘s this guy, and here is how YOU can help make it happen. Get into the High Noon Impeach Obama movement .

http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=Abqbsp0AgBw&feature=player_embedded
It’s easy and free and YOU are your own leader. Just get a few of your friends and neighbors, get a permit from your city hall, or whatever, make some signs, and go stand on a street corner at a busy intersection in your town for maximum one hour, at noon, every Saturday. We’ve been doing this in western North Carolina for a month, now, and the positive reaction from people has been incredible. Come November, when right-thinking people are running Congress again, they will know what their first order of business needs to be.
Michael Oberndorf, M.A., RPA is an archaeologist by profession, and a rabble rouser by choice…er…um…a political activist for conservative issues. He currently lurks about in western North Carolina, much to the annoyance of the liberals trying to infest the area.

http://floydreports.com/laws-not-lies/

================================================================================

More Citizens Demand: Impeach Obama
Posted on January 28, 2011 by Ben Johnson

As more Americans face the dire state of our union and the heavy toll the Obama administration has required of us all, an ever-growing number are calling for Barack Obama’s impeachment. This week alone, three separate calls for impeachment surfaced – significantly, among Democrats – at least one of them at one of the largest ongoing public rallies in U.S. history: the March for Life.

On Monday, thousands gathered in the nation’s capital to protest the taking of innocent life. One of the members of this diverse, pro-life group, Democrats for Life, met for breakfast before joining the larger group. Michael Sean Winter, who attended the Democratic meeting, recounted the scene on the National Catholic Reporter website, “Two people carry a large poster of President Obama, defaced to look like Hitler, and the slogan ‘Impeach Obama.’” Such opposition from within a Democratic event begs the question whether Democrats even want Obama to run in 2012. The same posters, with the same message, appeared this Wednesday in Mount Dora, Florida. The Orlando Sentinel reports: The group has gathered on the sidewalk in front of the Post Office on Donnelly Street for several days, passing out literature. However, today, code enforcement officials told the group they could not post signs or posters on city light poles. The group, which opposes recent federal healthcare legislation and bailouts of the banking industry, is encouraging the public to “Impeach Obama.” The Sentinel does not mention the group’s affiliation. Its opposition to ObamaCare indicate it is not composed of doctrinaire liberals. Not all calls are from the Right. The left-wing blog Firedoglake features a diary entry posted Tuesday entitled, “The Constitutional Case for the Impeachment of Barack Obama.” The author accuses Obama of covering up U.S. violations of the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which the Senate ratified in 1990. The left-wing writer states Obama has destroyed videotape and photographic evidence that may prove

inhumane treatment of terrorists in U.S. custody. “This goes far beyond mere failure to investigate torture – it is, in fact, a willful act to protect torturers,” the argument continues. “By repeatedly violating the United Nations Convention Against Torture, President Obama has violated the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. He is in direct violation of his oath of office. Therefore it is the Constitutional obligation of each and every member of the House of Representatives (per their own oaths of office) to begin impeachment proceedings.”

Click here to sign the petition to impeach Barack Obama. Learn more about ongoing efforts to impeach Obama.
http://floydreports.com/more-citizens-demand-impeach-obama/
=================================================================================

The Constitutional Case for the Impeachment of Barack Obama
By: Quasit Tuesday January 25, 2011 8:36 pm

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” – US
Constitution, Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight (1)

President Barack Obama stands in repeated and flagrant violation of his Presidential oath of office. Specifically, he has violated the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2):

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” (2) (emphasis added)
The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment was signed by President Ronald Reagan on April 18, 1988. It was ratified by the United States Senate on October 27, 1990 (4). Although there is a mechanism in the Convention

to allow signatories to denounce and thereby withdraw from the convention (Part I, Article 31), the United States has not done so. Part I, Article 12 of the Convention clearly states that

“Each State Party shall ensure that its competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation, wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed in any territory under its jurisdiction.”
Rather than investigating allegations of torture, however, the Obama

Administration has done little to hide its deliberate attempts to hinder such investigations. Photographic evidence has been destroyed. (5) Videotaped evidence has been willfully destroyed despite judicial injunctions forbidding that destruction; although
the destruction took place before President Obama assumed office, he has refused to authorize a meaningful investigation of that destruction and prosecution of the offenders. (6) Recent revelations from Wikileaks have shown that the

Obama Administration even colluded with Republican Senator Mel Martinez of Florida to intimidate the judiciary of Spain in order to suppress their investigation of alleged US acts of torture (7). This goes far beyond mere failure to investigate
torture – it is, in fact, a willful act to protect torturers. There have also been many additional allegations of torture, including most recently the mistreatment of detainee Bradley Manning.

By repeatedly violating the United Nations Convention Against Torture,

President Obama has violated the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. He is in direct violation of his oath of office. Therefore it is the Constitutional obligation of each
and every member of the House of Representatives (per their own oaths of office) to begin impeachment proceedings. That they have not and will not does not remove their legal and moral responsibility to do so. By refusing to take action, the House

has declared itself and the Presidency above the law. A tacit conspiracy, intentional or not, between the legislative and executive branches, and between the Democratic and Republican Parties, has cemented into place the foundations of a tyranny far more absolute and brutal than that of
King George III. The state of the union is dire, if not terminal. ————————————– 1) Presidential Oath of Office – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_office_of_the_President_of_the_U nited_States 2) Supremacy Clause – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause 3) United Nations Convention Against Torture – http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm 4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_and_the_United_States 5) http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/05/binyam-mohamedguantanamo-evidence-photographs 6) http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/17/washington/17intel.html 7) WikiLeaks: How U.S. tried to stop Spain’s torture probe –

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/12/25/105786/wikileaks-how-us-triedto-stop.html 45 Comments

http://my.firedoglake.com/quasit/2011/01/25/the-constitutional-case-forthe-impeachment-of-barack-obama/
==================================================================================

GOP sweep revives talk of

impeachment
Left-leaning pundit warns House will investigate Obama's birthplace
Posted: November 03, 2010 12:44 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

Talk of impeachment has been revived as the GOP moves into the majority in the U.S. House, with a left-leaning commentator warning that the House even could investigate Barack Obama's birthplace. It's not the first time impeachment has been raised as a possibility, but this time the warning comes from Ed Schultz of MSNBC, who appeared outraged at the possibility to GOP would be in leadership in the House. His comments:

"This is, as I've said all along on this program, about power and not governing," Schultz said. "House Republicans are promising what, subpoenas? They may even be launching an investigation into the president's birthplace. It'll be a rebirth of the birthers.
"They might go so far as to try to impeach President Obama," he said. WND reported when other commentators suggested that impeachment may not be all that bad. Jonathan Chait at The New Republic predicted that the House would impeach Obama with a majority in the House, but he wouldn't be removed from office because that would demand 67 votes in the Senate. "Hear me now and believe me later: If Republicans win and maintain control of the House of Representatives, they are going to impeach President Obama. They won't do it right away. And they won't succeed in removing Obama. (You need 67 Senate votes.) But if Obama wins a second term, the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office," Chait wrote. His prediction stirred an immediate furor among nay-sayers, even though Chait is far from the first to broach the subject. Read all about the grounds for impeachment. In the public forum section of Chait's column, "Ironyroad" wrote, "They'll buy themselves a race war. People aren't going to take it lying down, because they'll know it's because Obama's skin tone isn't to their taste, not because of high crimes and misdemeanors."

In his explanation of why he believes an impeachment could be forthcoming, Chait says the reason itself actually won't matter. "Wait, you say. What will they impeach him over? You can always find something. Mini-scandals break out regularly in Washington. Last spring, the political press erupted in a frenzy over the news that the White House had floated a potential job to prospective Senate candidate Joe Sestak. On a scale of one to 100, with one representing presidential jaywalking and 100 representing Watergate, the Sestak job offer probably rated about a 1.5. Yet it was enough that GOP Representative Darrell Issa called the incident an impeachable offense," Chait wrote. "As it happens, should Republicans win control of the House, Issa would bring his hair-trigger finger to the chairmanship of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The Sestak pseudo-scandal disappeared because there was no process to drive the story forward. Had Issa been running the Oversight Committee, it would have been the subject of hearings and subpoenas," he explained. WND reported earlier when Maj. Gen. Jerry Curry, who served in Vietnam and commanded the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground during his long military career, suggested Congress should simply hand Obama an ultimatum. "Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House," he said. "They should serve notice on him and say, 'Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You're under a cloud of suspicion. We can't continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.'"

He was answering questions on Stan Solomon's "Talk to Solomon" show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=fO8n4Pij158&feature=player_embedded
Further, retired U.S. Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a noted military leader who now is a presence on the Internet with his Stand Up For America and Veterans Defenders websites, earlier told WND he believes Obama should resign. Vallely, who served in Vietnam and retired in 1991 from the U.S. Army as deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said, "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (aka President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution." "We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government," he has warned. "'We the People' have had enough. Enough is enough. The Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress are now on a progressive-socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. 'We the People' cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen's interests above self-interest by resigning immediately," he said. Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation.

"I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said. WND also reported that former congressman and GOP presidential candidate Tom Tancredo said for current members of the House and Senate to uphold their oath to defend the United States against enemies "foreign and domestic," they need to file impeachment charges against Obama. Tancredo wrote in an opinion piece in the Washington Times that Obama's "refusal to live up to his own oath of office – which includes the duty to defend the United States against foreign invasion – requires senators and representatives to live up to their oaths. Members of Congress must defend our nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Today, that means bringing impeachment charges against Mr. Obama." At the same time, Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute, wrote, "President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached." Kuhner continued, "He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological

lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go." Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a WND column, discussed the ImpeachObamaCampaign.com they launched. And at the Taking American Back 2010 conference in Miami in September, Floyd Brown expanded on the idea. Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism, said, "The Obama presidency is a disease. … Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it's Obama's hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now. "Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray," Brown added. "He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he's doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he's taking us. "Barack Obama is a very dangerous man," said Brown. "Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup." WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah, who has editorialized that Obama has moved far beyond his constitutional authority in many of his actions, has questioned what would be wrong with impeachment. "It's about time Republicans in Congress start thinking about the Constitution and returning the rule of law to America," he wrote recently. "We're at a crossroads, and there is no margin for error.

"This isn't just about policy disagreements. It's about the biggest and most egregious abuse of power in American history. If you think I'm exaggerating, tell me how. It's time to step up to the plate. Americans are not sending Republicans to Congress this year in record numbers because they want a counterbalance to Obama in Washington. They are sending them there to change the direction of the country – radically."
Read more: GOP

sweep revives talk of impeachment http://www.wnd.com/? pageId=223553#ixzz1F090mF00
GOP sweep revives talk of impeachment: ‘Left-leaning pundit warns Housewill investigate Obama’s birthplace’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On November 3, 2010:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=223553
=================================================================================

'It's time to impeach Obama for high crimes against U.S.'
President blasted as a Christianity-hating tyrant 'working that anvil right now forging our chains'
Posted: September 16, 2010 6:50 pm Eastern

By Joe Kovacs
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

MIAMI –

An urgent plea to impeach a "Christianity-hating" President Obama for alleged "high crimes and misdemeanors" was issued today at the start of WND's "Taking America Back Conference" in South Florida.

The call was announced by Floyd Brown, president of the Western Center for Journalism, who asserted in strong terms the commander in chief is deliberately trying to destroy the principles on which the U.S. was founded.

"The Obama presidency is a disease," said Brown. "Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it's Obama's hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now." "Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray," Brown added. "He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he's doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he's taking us." A political innovator, writer and speaker, Brown is now running an online campaign to impeach the president. "Barack Obama is a very dangerous man," said Brown. "Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup." Read all about the grounds for impeachment. "For the international socialist movement of which Barack Obama is a card-carrying member," he added, "the U.S. must be brought to its knees, and I guarantee you that Barack Hussein Obama is doing everything he can to bring the country to its knees. He wants to bring it to its knees." Brown warned that a counterculture has risen up, dividing America. "They don't have the same respect for you as an individual and personal property, and these traditional ideas in the Constitution. That's why they're at war with the Constitution. Everything our forefathers fought

and died for to them is just trash to be thrown out on Monday morning." Brown responded to a common question about what specifically the president has done that rises to the level of impeachment by recalling President Gerald Ford in the 1970s, who indicated an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at any given moment in history. The U.S. Constitution states a president can be impeached for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Brown said the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" essentially means "bad behavior." He went through a list of what he considered bad behavior, saying Obama has "nationalized the banks. He nationalized GM and Chrysler. He's attacked the 2nd Amendment. He's taken over health care. He wants cap and trade legislation, so he literally taxes the air that you breathe. We breathe out CO2. He appointed czars to control your life without congressional oversight. He apologizes for us abroad. I find it personally offensive that he would apologize for this great land." Brown said the president has committed actual crimes, including offering jobs in exchange for political favors; firing Inspector General Gerald Walpin who was investigating Obama friend Kevin Johnson for allegedly misusing funds; and is now actively trying to bankrupt America, adding more to the national deficit in nine months than in the first 200 years of U.S. history. He noted the Congressional Budget Office has warned that unless Obama can control his appetite for deficit spending, accumulated debt

could spark a U.S. fiscal crisis similar to recent ones in Greece and Ireland. Brown then turned to matters of faith, and blasted Obama's contention that he's a Christian. "Obama hates Christianity," Brown declared. "He is a Muslim. Others will say he's just a godless atheist. The bottom line is that this man hates Christianity." He said at Georgetown University, Obama forced the school to cover the name of Jesus on the podium, and he paraphrased the president's comments suggesting the U.S. was no longer a Christian nation, but could now be considered a Muslim nation. "Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers," Obama stated. "He said it!" exclaimed Brown. "Have you read about it in the New York Times, the Washington Post, or the Wall Street Journal? There is a conspiracy of silence in the mainstream media to cover up this man's hatred of Christianity." He quoted American leaders of the past, including President Andrew Jackson, who called the Bible "the rock upon which our republic rests," and Patrick Henry, who said, "It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains." "Obama is that tyrant and he's working that anvil right now of forging our chains," said Brown.

Brown admitted that there would have to be a change in the leadership of Congress in the upcoming November elections to make impeachment a reality, but said the issue was pressing. "Do we wait until he's totally ripped our country apart?" Brown asked. He closed by invoking President Ronald Reagan, who was noted for saying, "If not us, then who? If not now, when?" The "Taking America Back Conference" is a three-day event taking place at the Doral Resort in Miami, and includes dozens of speakers including U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., former presidential candidates Alan Keyes and Tom Tancredo, and authors Jerome Corsi, Aaron Klein and David Kupelian. Other speakers include scientist and Bible teacher Chuck Missler; talkshow host Rusty Humphries, Michael Farris of Home School Legal Defense Association; Robert Knight and Jerry Newcombe of Coral Ridge Ministries; William Murray of the Religious Freedom Coalition and son of notorious atheist Madeline Murray O'Hair; RC Sproul, Jr., author of "Biblical Economics"; "Saturday Night Live" alum Victoria Jackson, author-columnist Erik Rush and author Judith Reisman.
Read more: 'It's time to impeach Obama for high crimes against U.S.' http://www.wnd.com/? pageId=204149#ixzz1F0Bjawo1

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204149

===============================================================================

Heroes Demand Impeachment of ObamaHitler
by Ken Layne by Ken Layne 2:04 am August 14, 2010

“Barack” sounds kind of German, doesn’t it? We mean, if you’ve never heard German before … and Obama is just like Hitler in every way, if by “every way” you mean “a little Hitler mustache has been painted on his upper lip.” But what are these people campaigning for, on the roadside of America?

Wonkette operative “F. A.” sent the photo and this terrifying description of the street action in Mills, Massachusetts: I live in a really small town. This is so bizarre. I have no idea who the candidate they are supporting is. Will send the other photo of the side of the car. They also have signs on the front that say “pull over” and “stop Obama”. People are stopping and are pissed! A local HS teacher went off on them. You know who else used to get pissed? That’s right, Hitler. Also, Obama turned the White House into a mosque last night so Islamic Terrorists could continue building a gym in the same neighborhood as the huge abandoned pit in the Earth called, by some bloggers, “Ground Zero.” [Business Week] http://wonkette.com/417435/heroes-demand-impeachment-of-obama-hitler

======================================================

Documented: Grounds for

impeachment

'This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless ... '
Posted: August 23, 2010 9:04 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

Lying, bribing, subverting election laws, payoffs, aiding the nation's enemies, seeking the abrogation of the U.S. Constitution – which of these does not fall under the "high crimes

and misdemeanors" required in the nation's founding documents for the removal of a sitting president, asks a new special report. "The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America" by Steven Baldwin covers all of these issues and more in making its arguments. "This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless the people exercise their precious remaining liberties and stand and demand that their elected representatives impeach this president before further mortal damage is inflicted upon America," the report concludes. The author explains that the Founding Fathers enshrined the impeachment clause into the United States Constitution because they feared that a president intent on subverting the very principles upon which the American experiment was built would someday rise to power. Get the details, in "The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America"

"Despite all the checks and balances and obstacles they put in place, the Founders knew a determined cabal could still gain control of all three branches of government and wield this consolidation of power to dismantle our cherished constitutional principles, and eradicate the freedoms that generations of Americans sacrificed their lives to preserve," he writes.

"Make no mistake: That day is now upon us."

In "The Case for Impeachment," Baldwin, a senior research fellow at the Western Journalism Center, says the issue of impeachment "is no longer a laughing matter."

"With the economy continuing to implode, the coming collapse of the dollar, high unemployment rates, the government takeover of entire industries, the administration's weak and naive response to the worldwide jihadist threat, and the ongoing frontal assault on our Judeo-Christian heritage, the impeachment option is one that can no longer be ignored," he finds.
Impeachment, after all, is based on "high

crimes and

misdemeanors," an "old English common law phrase which, in the 1600s, meant negligence, abuse of power, and abuse of trust," the report says. "Not only has the Obama administration promoted dangerous and unsustainable policies, but it has also engaged in corrupt and illegal activities such as bribery, a crime the Founders specifically cited as an impeachable offense. Moreover, this report details numerous instances of Obama lying to the

American people, a pattern which clearly indicates a character defect that in itself endangers America. Given this, we believe impeachment is necessary for the future survival of America," says the report. Among the factors Americans should consider:
•

Obama's violations of federal campaign and ethics laws, including the offers from his administration to Democratic U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, who reported he was offered a high-ranking government job to drop his opposition in the Pennsylvania Senate primary to sitting Sen. Arlen Specter. Obama's effort "to persuade the [Illinois] governor to fill the vacated Senate seat with his longtime adviser Valerie Jarrett." Suggestions from Obama's own Federal Election Commission documentation that he got at least $33.8 million for his campaign from disallowed foreign contributions, including 520 contributions from interests in Iran as well as $30,000 from the Hamascontrolled Gaza area. Obama's administration decision to drop a case that prosecutors already had won against "black nationalist

•

•

•

thugs" who were seen on video apparently intimidating voters during the 2008 election.
•

Obama fired an inspector general, Gerald Walpin, after he exposed corruption linked to one of Obama's buddies, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson. The president's system of rewarding supporters has come under question. The report confirms more than 70 individuals who raised $50,000 or more for Obama "have been rewarded with ambassadorships or high ranking jobs."

•

The report documents how Obama's actions even may have endangered Americans by "treating the war on terrorism as a criminal matter and downplaying the war on terrorism."

"This attitude has manifested itself in a number of ways: Obama's casual attitude may have encouraged domestic terrorist attacks, such as the November 5, 2009, Ft. Hood shooting by Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan that left thirteen American military personnel dead."

His Department of Homeland Security also has "described veterans and other law-abiding Americans [as] 'rightwing extremists," the report says.
Further, the report explains how the U.S.

State Department gave a grant to the Al-Quds television network, owned by the terrorist group Hamas, and invited them to the U.S. to produce a propaganda film.
Samantha Power, who once referred to the U.S. presence in Iraq as an "occupation" even as she favored sending troops to Israel to forcibly impose a Palestinian state, was appointed by Obama to the National Security Council, the report says. And the report reveals how rapper Jay-Z and Beyonce were photographed sitting around the "Situation Room" – the confidential White House location filled with top secret communications equipment that allows the tracking of terror threats worldwide. Access to the room normally requires a high security clearance level.

"Many of Obama's actions, if they do not flat-out violate the Constitution, certainly undermine the spirit and intent of the Constitution as envisioned by our Founding Fathers," the report explains.

And his fiscal policies "are causing unprecedented damage to America's financial health and to our reputation abroad."
The president even has changed history to remove Christian references, the report explains.

"In his 2010 Easter greeting message, Obama quoted from a sermon given by a military pastor on Iwo Jima in 1945. However, he removed passages dealing with Christian doctrine – like Christ's resurrection – in order to make the quote appealing to all religions, even though Easter is NOT a multicultural event; it's a Christian event. Obama altered a great historical quote in order to serve his multicultural worldview. Apparently he is embarrassed by America’s Christian heritage."
The report also has extensive sections on Democrats' new health-care law and what it means, as well as immigration.

"President Barack Obama has proven to be incompetent, reckless, deceitful, and naive when it comes to making economic decisions and protecting America’s security interests. His history

of corruption, power-grabbing, and misleading the American people have created a pattern we believe jeopardizes America," the report says.
"This report reveals a pattern that demonstrates Obama is constantly engaging in actions that reflect a hard-left ideology antithetical to America's founding principles. … Obama is clearly dismissive of America’s constitutional principles and obviously dislikes the role America plays in the world. He dislikes our Judeo-Christian heritage and detests America's historical allies.

"Less than halfway through his first term, Obama has done more damage to America than any previous president in history. Some of the damage can be repaired; some can't. Some of his policies will haunt generations to come," the report says. "It's time for the American people to rise up and demand Congress impeach him."
Read more: Documented: Grounds for impeachment http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=194785#ixzz1F0DkNmb6

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=194785

=================================================================================

Ex-congressman: President a 'threat,'

t Presiden Obama bowing to Japan's emperor

must be

impeached

'We have man in White House who brazenly disregards his oath of office'
A former congressman and GOP presidential candidate says, for current members of the House and Senate to uphold their oath of office that includes the defense of the United States against enemies "foreign

and domestic," they need to be filing impeachment charges against Barack Obama. Former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., joined what has become a growing surge of those recommending the ultimate solution for a president they believe not only has disagreeable policies, but is participating in actions that damage the nation. Tancredo wrote in a opinion piece in the Washington Times that "Mr. Obama's refusal to live up to his own oath of office – which includes the duty to defend the United States against foreign invasion – requires senators and representatives to live up to their oaths. Members of Congress must defend our nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Today, that means bringing impeachment charges against Mr. Obama." The ultimate guide to Obama's radical agenda – and how to stop it! Tancredo is not the first to raise the idea of impeachment against Obama, who has implemented legislation and policies effectively nationalizing financial institutions, automobile companies, health care and many other previously private interests. In fact, he was not even the only person on this particular day. Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute, wrote at the same time, "President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached." Kuhner continued, "He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of

checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go." Tancredo's arguments aren't complicated. During his brief presidential run in 2008 he focused on the border-security issue of the United States, and he still is concerned that the failure to secure the U.S. boundary – especially with Mexico – will lead to tragic consequences at the hands of border-crossing terrorists. Tancredo appeared on Fox News today to defend his position from skeptics, saying Obama's responsibility is to protect and defend the Constitution and the United States, not "fundamentally transform" them. "Our president is an enemy of our Constitution, and, as such, he is a danger to our safety, our security and our personal freedoms," Tancredo warns, affirming his belief that Obama is more dangerous for the United States than al-Qaida. "He is more dangerous simply because he is inside," he said. "Few people took him seriously about fundamentally transforming America. That is what he is all about. That is what he has set about doing. He is a committed ideologue. When you have someone like that in the White House, it is a scary proposition."

Obama bowing to Saudi Arabian leader

He cited the president's lack of action to adequately secure the border with Mexico.

"He's putting his country in danger," Tancredo said.
"The country the Founders put together, that's what's in jeopardy." "Barack Obama is one of the most powerful presidents this nation has seen in generations. He is powerful because he is supported by large majorities in Congress, but, more importantly, because he does not feel constrained by the rule of law. Whether he is putting up the weakest possible defense of the Defense of Marriage Act despite the Justice Department's legal obligation to support existing law; disenfranchising Chrysler and GM bondholders in order to transfer billions of investor

dollars to his supporters in the United Auto Workers; or implementing yet a third offshore oil-drilling moratorium even after two federal courts have thrown out two previous moratoriums, President Obama is determined to see things done his way regardless of obstacles," Tancredo wrote in his op-ed. "To Mr. Obama, the rule of law is a mere inconvenience to be ignored, overcome or 'transcended' through international agreements or 'norms.'" Tancredo wrote that the "dedicated

Marxist who lives in the White House" holds power over budgets, the judiciary, national defense and health care. As such, "his regime and his program are not just about changing public policy in the conventional sense. When one considers the combination of his stop-at-nothing attitude, his contempt for limited government, his appointment of judges who want to create law rather than interpret it – all of these make this president today's single greatest threat to the great experiment in freedom that is our republic. "Yes, Mr. Obama is a more serious threat to America than al-Qaida. We know that Osama bin

Laden and followers want to kill us, but at least they are an outside force against whom we can offer our best defense. But when a dedicated enemy of the Constitution is working from the inside, we face a far more dangerous threat. Mr. Obama can accomplish with the stroke of his pen what bin Laden cannot accomplish with bombs and insurgents."
Tancredo, who served five terms representing Colorado and now is chairman of the Rocky Mountain Foundation, was joined by Kuhner, who accused Obama of abusing his office and violating his oath. Kuhner cited Obama's demand that all Americans buy health insurance.

"The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a good or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power," he wrote. "Yet Obamacare's most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children.

This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens."
He further cited Obama's actions regarding the BP oil spill.

"There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia's Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda."
He also wrote about the takeovers in the auto and financial industries, and the New Black Panther case.

"Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper," he said. "As president, he is supposed to respect the rule of law. Instead, his administration has dropped charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. This was done even though their menacing behavior was caught on tape: men

in military garb brandishing clubs and threatening whites at a polling site."
Tancredo nearly two months ago broached the subject of impeachment, suggesting an "impeachment file."

"I believe there is a growing body of evidence of impeachable offenses sufficient to warrant a formal impeachment resolution in the House, followed by a trial in the Senate," he wrote at the time.
And the suggestion even has come from onlookers at a presidential appearance. CNN has documented when Obama made a surprise visit to a crowd on a shuttle bus, one onlooker shouted, "When are you going to quit? When are you going to be impeached?" The issue even has appeared among online gamers, when Microsoft told an Xbox user the signon name "Impeach Obama" was not allowed because, "If you were President Obama, how would you feel if someone wanted to impeach you?" Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a column on WND, discussed the ImpeachObamaCampaign.com that they launched. They reported that many, instead of examining the evidence, attacked the messengers.

"We expected these attacks," they reported. But they said the unresolved issues include:

•

"Obama repeatedly lies to the American people when he says we can keep our private insurance, knowing full well that his legislation will inevitably drive private insurers out of business. "Gerald Walpin, inspector general of the Corporation for National and Community Service, investigated Kevin Johnson, a big buddy of the president, for misuse of funds from an AmeriCorps grant. Obama did not like Walpin's investigation and findings, whereupon he vindictively fired Walpin to cover for his friend, Johnson. A subsequent investigation vindicated Walpin's judgment in the matter. "Barack Obama oversaw the effective takeover by government of banks, the largest insurance company (AIG), General Motors and Chrysler – the bulk of the U.S. auto industry – thus stripping bondholders, shareholders and others of their personal property. "Barack Obama is actively pursuing cap-and-trade legislation. Instead of taxing the very air we breathe, it will instead, in a manner of speaking, tax the air we exhale, giving the government unprecedented control over the economy and American businesses. Those taxed businesses will then pass the fees onto the American people. "Spending American citizens' money, Barack Hussein Obama is running up our debt at an alarming rate. In just the nine months since Obama assumed office, our national debt has gone up by over a trillion dollars. To put that figure in perspective, it took George W. Bush eight years to add $4.8 trillion to the national debt. "And, to add insult to injury, Obama is printing money like it's going out of style. The effect will be hyperinflation, a crippling of

•

•

•

•

•

our economy and, quite possibly, personal hardship on a scale that has not been experienced since the Great Depression.
•

"Barack Hussein Obama appointed countless "czars" to oversee everything from the closing of Guantanamo to the food we eat. These czars don't have to be approved by the Senate. The czars have unprecedented power and report only to Obama. Members of both parties are disturbed by these extra-constitutional excrescences. Sen. Robert Byrd said: "The accumulation of power by White House staff can threaten the constitutional system of checks and balances." Rep. Jack Kingston called the czars a "parallel government." "And finally, Obama consistently refuses to approve the release of his actual birth certificate, college transcripts and his medical records. Is he trying to hide something that will threaten his presidency?"

•

Retired U.S. Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a noted military leader who now is a presence on the Internet with his Stand Up For America and Veterans Defenders websites, told WND he would like Obama to resign. Vallely, who served in Vietnam and retired in 1991 Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely from the U.S. Army as deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said, "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (aka President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution."

"We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government," he has warned.

"'We the People' have had enough. Enough is enough. The Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress are now on a progressivesocialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. 'We, the People' cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen's interests above selfinterest by resigning immediately," he said.
Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation. "I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said.

Posted: July 23, 2010 3:05 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh © 2011 WorldNetDaily

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=182929

==================================================================================

Call for Obama's resignation cites 'deceit, fraud, dishonesty' 'We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government'

*

A retired U.S. military leader who now is a presence on the Internet with his Stand Up For America and Veterans Defenders websites has

issued a call for President Obama's resignation and a new election to replace him.
The call comes from Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, who served in Vietnam and retired in 1991 from the U.S. Army as deputy commanding general for the Pacific.

"We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution," he said in remarks
delivered to a Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia City, Mont., last week and published today on the Stand Up America website. "And a call for a national petition for new elections to select the next president of the United States of America must be initiated," he continued. "We

can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government."
A number of retired military members have sought the removal of Obama from office. They mostly have tried to utilize the courts to challenge his eligibility based on claims he

fails to meet the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen." Few have asserted Obama

needs to walk away from the Oval Office for the best of the nation. "The Declaration of Independence states: 'To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their safety and happiness,'" Vallely said in his
remarks.

"We cannot permit the current leaders in the White House and halls of Congress to continue in their efforts to lead us down the road of progressive socialism and destruction of America. This is the current battle that we constitutionalists face, and we must be aggressive in our efforts," he said.
He pointed out that the oath of office for the president is basic, stating, "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of

the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."

"Sadly, we have seen them violate their oath. Fraud, lying, and corruption are rampant and some have engaged in treasonous activities, and they effectively thumb their noses at us and have sold you to the highest bidder," he said. "Lincoln issued this warning in his inaugural address, 'Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one. This is a most valuable and sacred right – a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world,'" Vallely said.

"Being a representative republic, not a democracy, 'rising up' means other than revolution by means of arms. The people must 'rise up' from the grass roots across this great country as we think of the greater good of this and future generations. We are limited in the peaceful transfer of power…

resignation, death, elections, and impeachment," he
said.

"'We the People' have had enough. Enough is enough. The Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. 'We, the People' cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen's interests above selfinterest by resigning immediately," he said.
Vallely graduated from West Point and was commissioned in the Army in 1961. He served 32 years before retiring, including in theaters in Europe and the Pacific Rim. He saw two tours of combat duty in Vietnam. He's of late been a military analyst for the Fox News Channel and a lecturer on counter-terrorism. From 1982 to 1986 he commanded the 351st Civil Affairs Command that included all special forces, psychological warfare and civil military units in the Western United States and Hawaii.

He told WND he is speaking as an American citizen who wants to see the nation restored to a role of world leadership peacefully.

Vallely said Obama's record is of failure at just about everything, from the massive buckets of cash handed out in his bailout programs to his instability on foreign policy and his "lack of resolve" on military issues.
He said while he doesn't call himself a "birther," even the issue of Obama's eligibility remains unresolved. "Certainly as a citizen I don't buy off on his eligibility," he said. But more significant than Obama's record, history, qualifications or even presidency is the nation's future, he said. "We cannot continue to self-destruct here." He said he's calling for the resignation of the president because that's what responsible citizens should be doing. Congress, certainly, is not going to take responsibility and get the job done, he said. "I want the people to stand up and take government back, peacefully," he told WND. On Vallely's website, forum participants were in lock-step: "As a Vietnam veteran and believer in the Constitution I am in full support of these observations and comments," said Ralph Kennedy. "It seems that even the military forces have been in decline along with the political culture in our country since Mr. Obama has been in place. … I

applaud the courage and the common sense exhibited by Mr. Vallely in his statement." Added Ronald Hei, "As a Vietnam veteran and retired military officer, I fully support Gen. Vallely's call for the resignation of Obama. Failing resignation, I call for the petition of the U.S. Congress (existing) for his impeachment for ALL of the transgressions listed above and some not listed." David J. Austin said, "Our government under the current president has demonstrated moral corruptness in nearly all aspects of its performance. Our country and flag have been disgraced by the actions of Obama. … I would like to see the new Congress, after the 2010 elections, demand his immediate resignation or begin impeachment proceedings." The topic of Vallely's work also was scheduled to be on the Patriots Heart Network online report tonight. Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation. "I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said. There's a new strategy to get answers to Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help. In his Spectator piece, which came only days before Vallely's remarks, Ferrera said, "What leads me to predict President Obama's early political demise are his numerous, enormous vulnerabilities to further adverse developments, threatening a geometrically accelerating downward spiral, for him politically, and for America substantively."

Ferrara cited Obama's controversies over the Rep. Joe Sestak scandal, his lack of management of the Gulf oil spill, more and more taxes for Americans, a "blind" energy policy and others. "The president himself has laid the foundation for his biggest political vulnerability of all," he said. "He won our votes and the election in 2008 with 'the firm pledge' not to raise taxes 'in any form' on anyone making less than $250,000 a year. Now he has already backed away from that pledge," he said. A voter backlash against Democrats expected in November will result in Democrats themselves having "limited tolerance for the above described political pressures and chaos," he said. "With the very survival of their party at stake, the Democrats will buckle and desert President Obama, joining the calls for his resignation. "At that point, with zero prospects for re-election, and unable to govern effectively, he will resign," Ferrara said. Other military officers have taken a more direct approach to challenging Obama's presidency. WND has reported the case of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, a career physician who has refused Army orders because of the lack of documentation for Obama's eligibility. Lakin invited his own court action in a video: Lakin was not the first officer to raise questions. Others have included Army doctor Capt. Connie Rhodes and Army reservist Maj. Stefan Cook.

The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." WND has covered a multitude of challenges and lawsuits over the issue. Some have alleged that he was not born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, or that the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the office. Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

"Where's The Birth Certificate?" billboard helps light up the night at the Mandalay Bay resort on the Las
Vegas Strip.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?" The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 500,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question. A new effort now asks those in authority regarding the nation's elections to demand the full proof. The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.
Read more: Call for Obama's resignation cites 'deceit, fraud, dishonesty' http://www.wnd.com/? pageId=164409<#ixzz1F0QBhtEC
Posted: June 08, 2010 By © 2011 WorldNetDaily

Bob Unruh

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=164409%3C

=================================================================================

Impeach Obama over the Gropergate
scandal
Published: Saturday, November 20, 2010, 7:25 PM
By Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger

Updated: Sunday, November 21, 2010, 1:19 AM

UPON FURTHER THOUGHT: At first I was being facetious when I put up the post below. But the more I think of it, the more I like the idea of impeaching Obama for Gropergate. After all, Bill Clinton was impeached because a government employee voluntarily had contact with his genitals.

Obama is ordering government employees to forcefully have contact with the genitals of private citizens. Which is worse? All I can say is Monica Lewinsky never touched anyone who didn't want to be touched. I'm not a big Obama-hater. If you read this blog, you know I rarely criticize him any more than any other Democrat. To me, he's no worse, no better. But if he supports this assault on a cancer survivor: Before starting the enhanced pat-down procedure, a security officer did tell him what they were going to do and how they were going to it, but Sawyer said it wasn’t until they asked him to remove his sweatshirt and saw his urostomy bag that they asked any questions about his medical condition. “One agent watched as the other used his flat hand to go slowly down my chest. I tried to warn him that he would hit the bag and break the seal on my bag, but he ignored me. Sure enough, the seal was broken and urine started dribbling down my shirt and my leg and into my pants.” The security officer finished the pat-down, tested the gloves for any trace of explosives and then, Sawyer said, “He told me I could go. They never apologized. They never offered to help. They acted like they hadn’t seen what happened. But I know they saw it because I had a wet mark.” Humiliated, upset and wet, Sawyer said he had to walk through the airport soaked in urine, board his plane and wait until after takeoff before he could clean up. “I am totally appalled by the fact that agents that are performing these pat-downs have so little concern for people with medical conditions,” said Sawyer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVKmMD_QuA&feature=player_embedded
Note: This poor guy's entire letter is here. ALSO: I've been warning conservatives that Senator Jim DeMint is a big-government liberal. Check this quote: Sen. Jim DeMint, a South Carolina Republican, acknowledged that "we're getting hundreds of calls" from constituents about the new security procedures, but he stopped short of criticizing them. "You're doing what you can to try to modify this in a way that seems reasonable to people and to keep them safe," he told the TSA chief. "You've got a very tough job, but I mostly just wanted to thank you for what you're doing." ALSO: Check the comments on Trotskyite Tyrrell's post on Townhall. He's not getting a lot of support in his effort to suck up to the beltway types. I suspect this neocon's effort to pretend he's a conservative has ended in failure. Below is the guy who could move into the Oval Office and not treat us like criminals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVKmMD_QuA&feature=player_embedded
http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2010/11/impeach_obama.html

==================================================================================

By COasis on February 23rd, 2011

Impeach Obama
In what I consider to be a stupidly bold move by a president who is already riddled with criticism over his inability to follow what would be considered the rule of law in this country, Pres. Obama today directed the Justice Department to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act, otherwise known as DOMA. He did so on the grounds that he feels the law is “unconstitutional”. This would be amazing were not for the fact that this asshole has spent much of his adult life taunting authority and legal precedent under the auspices of “civil disobedience”. It’s beyond my comprehension how a sitting president can direct the policies of a nation from on high, as

though he were on some kind of throne, with a scofflaw like attitude towards what is a perfectly legitimate legislative act. This is law. It was passed by a Congress and the Senate. It was signed by a president. A Democratic president. Bill Clinton. Even if it’s wrong, the recourse to fix it is through legislative or judicial action. Since the left and those that neither is coming anytime soon, our current White House resident has determined that it’s time for him to take action, all on his own. This kind activity, by this dumb ass, elected by a bunch of other dumb asses, reeks of the insolent attitude which is inherently found in the childish behavior of the dumb ass left. In other words, “we follow laws, unless we don’t like the laws, and then we fight the laws I breaking the laws, and call it civil disobedience”. We are nation of laws. The left has shown over and over that they do not care one whit for laws of this country when the laws don’t go their way. They think that marching people in public squares and circles in order try make a point, all the while breaking the law and contracts they signed, is fine. They also think that it is fine for president to be a scofflaw, or their elected officials to be scofflaws. Today on Fox news, Alan Colmes stated that he felt that the president’s demand that the Justice Department stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act was an exercise of “checks and balances”. Now, I find Alan Colmes to be a barely tolerable liberal idiot that occasionally makes reasonable arguments, but in this case he could not be more wrong. “Checks and balances” refers to a process which reflects on legislative, presidential, judicial actions which happen within a certain timeframe, or legislative process. To suggest that any president now or in the future can declare any law unconstitutional and therefore

stipulate that the Justice Department should stop defending or prosecuting on the basis of that law, is absolutely freaking preposterous. To suggest that the concept of “checks and balances” in a democratic three party system allows a ‘future’ president to declare a law unconstitutional is preposterous and idiotic. In other words, if you are the President, and you have sworn to uphold the laws of the United States, that is not your job to doubt, question, pontificate, or challenge any law that is currently active. Your job is to either enforce the law and try to change it, or just enforce the law and leave it as it is. In either case you need to enforce the law, first. What we’re talking about here with regards to Alan Combs point of view and the left liberal point of view is the rules really don’t matter. Laws don’t matter. Processes and accepted moral and ethical standards don’t matter. What matters is getting your own way. What matters is foot-stomping, fit throwing, all the while hiding your activities under the umbrella description of “civil disobedience”. Laws are laws. We are a nation of laws. The fact that we are a nation of laws makes us the country we are. I suggest we start implementing legal punitive processes against every entity in this country which will not abide by the law. That means the president, the Atty. Gen., the teachers in Wisconsin, the Democrat senators in Wisconsin, and any other elected official or appointed official which will not perform their duties as prescribed by law. Yes, I am saying impeach Barack Obama. He has officially come out asking for the Justice Department to stop enforcing a legitimately passed law, a law which was passed with checks and balances in place and exercised.

http://conservativeoasis.com/impeach-obama/

=================================================================================

Impeach Obama Today
If newspapers and other media were doing their job, this blog would not exist.
Friday, February 4, 2011

'Green' jobs are 'Tammany Hall style bossism,' pounding the hated American middle class-who will never know what hit it- into the gutter . 'Green' jobs are "the ultimate in Tammany Hall-style political bossism -- the political earmark that dwarfs all others.
•

The green jobs agenda is a political spoils and cronyism system operating in the open, justifying itself through

political correctness and overblown claims that it is dictated by global warming."... -----------2/3/2011, "'Green jobs,' cronyism and cannibalism," Huffington Post, Ernest Istook "Simply put, the green jobs agenda spends billions of taxpayer dollars to destroy existing jobs and replace them with jobs in politically-favored businesses, raising the costs of energy along the way. The politically-connected win. Existing job-holders and companies lose. Home electric bills go up. Power also costs more for companies,
•

making it more expensive to go into business or to stay in business.

It's cronyism that is building a political power structure based on false claims about clean green jobs.
• •

It's cannibalism because creating the green jobs requires killing off existing jobs.

As Bloomberg News reported, "Subsidizing renewable energy in the U.S. may destroy two jobs for every one created if Spain's experience with windmills and solar farms is any guide."

One Heritage Foundation study showed that proposed mandates for using "renewable energy" to generate electricity
•

would cost 1-million jobs.

Had last year's cap-and-trade bill been passed, we might have lost almost 2million jobs. That compares to claims by the renewal energy industry that 274,000 jobs would be created by their products.
•

We would lose 3 to 7 jobs or more for every one that we gain....

Obama wants us to pay for the privilege of destroying jobs. His State of the Union called for
•

"incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America."

Guess what? If it requires incentives, it isn't profitable! "When the President and Congress talk about green jobs, they are talking about ones created
•

via federal tax breaks, subsidies, or outright mandates,"

noted The Heritage Foundation's Ben Liebermann. The green jobs agenda is all about making a large group dependent on the politicians who provide them money and who in exchange receive campaign donations and other political support.

•

It is the ultimate in Tammany Hall-style political bossism -- the political earmark that dwarfs all others.

The green jobs agenda is a political spoils and cronyism system operating in the open, justifying itself through
•

political correctness and overblown claims that it is dictated by global warming.

POLITICO reported that the alternative energy sector only spent $2.4million on lobbying in 1998, but that grew to $30-million a year by 2009. The story noted, "The speed of expansion is eye-popping," and added, "Wind, solar, ethanol up and other alternative energy groups are also stepping up their political contributions to candidates -- almost all of them Democrats. Yes, the fossil fuel lobby spends about five times more than the alternative energy lobby, but fossil fuel produces over 20 times as much power -- about 70% of our national electricity
•

compared to about 3%.

How about claims that existing federal policies already advantage fossil fuels? A report from the federal Department of Energy shows that each megawatt of power produced by wind or solar power receives subsidies almost 100 times higher than for oil and natural gas, and
•

about 50 times higher than for coal.

Even The New York Times reported that wind-generated power costs 50% more than power generated from fossil fuel, and power from solar energy costs 2-3 times more than wind power.

Perhaps someday those who profit from subsidizing alternative energy will admit what they've done, just as Al Gore now admits his push for billions in ethanol subsidies was a mistake based on political gain-•

not even counting his monetary gain since leaving office.

As The Wall Street Journal said, "ethanol has become a purely political machine: It serves no purpose other than re-electing incumbents and transferring wealth to farm states and ethanol producers." But don't some business interests support the green agenda? Sadly, yes. They tend to be those who profit from these subsidies. Writing in Forbes, Jerry Bowyer noted,
•

"What is the difference between crony capitalism and socialism? Not much."

We did not win the space race by putting extra costs and burdens on ourselves to benefit a team of politicians and businesses that scratch each others' backs. Obama's call to action isn't based on Sputnik; it's based on apparatchik. We don't need that cronyism. Or to cannibalize existing jobs
•

so cronies can build more power for themselves."

via Tom Nelson

http://impeachobamatoday.blogspot.com/2011/02/green-jobs-are-tammany-hall-style.html

==================================================================================

A CALL TO IMPEACH OBAMA
September 7, 2010 By dana Reported in The Washington Times; Columnist,

Jeffrey T. Kuhner stated the following:

“President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. Mr. Obama should be impeached.”

Kuhner goes on to say that Obama, is slowly erecting a Socialist Dictatorship. He is putting America on a dangerous path and is

undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. He has abused his office and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. His health care overhaul could only get passed through bribery and political intimidation and, taxpayer money was used to buy swing votes. The law is blatantly unconstitutional. Obamacare federally funds abortion, violating the conscience rights of religious citizens, and will result in a cultural civil war. Obama is waging a frontal assault on property rights. The BP oil spill is a case in point. BP clearly is responsible for the spill and its massive economic and environmental damage to the Gulf. There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Obama has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda. Billions will be dispensed arbitrarily in compensation to oil-spill victims – much of it to Democratic constituents. This is cronyism and creeping authoritarianism.

Ob ama’s multicultural socialism has created a command-and-control

health care system. He has essentially nationalized the big banks, the financial sector, the automakers and the student loan industry. Next is “cap-and-trade,” which would bring industry and manufacturing under the heel of big government. The state is intervening in every aspect of American life – Under Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper. Obama calls for “comprehensive immigration reform” – granting amnesty to 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens. This would forge a permanent Democratic electoral majority. It would sound the death knell for our national sovereignty. It means the death of American nationhood. We will no longer be a country, but the colony of a global socialist empire. As it turns out, this is not the first impeachment article for the Washington Times. In July, former GOP Presidential candidate and Colorado gubernatorial candidate Tom Tancredo wrote an article for the paper. The problems regarding Presidential high crimes and misdemeanors go far beyond the White House. Basically, Congress follows Obama like little robots and upholds his disregard of our nation’s laws and its Constitution As long as the Socialist Democrats control Congress, impeachment will never happen. The only way impeachment can occur, is to have a massive Republican (conservatives, not RINOS) takeover of both the House and the Senate in November. Obama has violated his oath of office by his actions/inaction regarding federal enforcement of immigration law and his intention to punish the state of Arizona for passing a law that would enforce federal mandates.

A clear example of Congress as an accessory to the crimes is a littlereported covert act cap & trade. Many conservatives have long warned about actions such as these by Obama and Congress, but mainly with regard to the upcoming ‘lame duck session’ between November and January before the new Congress can be seated. Cap and trade was one of the bills the Left promised to pass before they left office. Now, however, it appears they have already done so, and that without debate or vote. Although it appears that 65 BILLION dollars have already been transfered to an entity that profits from ‘capping’ greenhouse gases in the Northeast, citizens still have a window of opportunity to stop it from being implemented across the country–IF they bombard Congress with protests over cap and trade.

Such legislation would add an extra $2400 to $5000 dollars in energy costs PER YEAR PER HOUSEHOLD in America, placing yet another financial burden on families who are still suffering from the worst economic decline since the Great Depression. These oppressive measures

are being forced on the American public by elected co-conspirators in the economic collapse, such as Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Patrick Leahy, Barbara Boxer, Chuck Schumer, and many others who gave their nod to the dubious government policy dating all the way back to the mid-1990s to essentially turn Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into welfare agencies, only underscores the corruption that is entrenched in Washington, in Congress, AND the White House.

I say Impeach and Imprison! Confiscate Obama’s money and assets as well as the money and assets of all his partners in crime, to include George Soros (the high Mucketymuck) and use their money to pay what we can on the National Debt. Have them incarcerated in Arizona with Sheriff Arpaio; then transport them to China to be prosecuted for

impersonating the president of the United States and Congress, and for obtaining a loan under false pretences.
http://franklincountypatriots.net/2010/09/07/another-call-to-impeach-obama-2/

==================================================================================

The Usurper

martes, 13 de octubre de 2009 31 REASONS TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (aka Barry Soetoro):

http://www.repubx.com/

31 REASONS TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (aka Barry Soetoro)
by DefendUSx October 11, 2009 From Blogsphere:

The history of the current President of the United States, Barack Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these United States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

1. He has violated his oath to defend the US Constitution by exercising powers forbidden by the Constitution. 2. He has used public money to purchase private companies. 3. He has illegally tried to use public money to create publicly owned companies. 4. He has embezzled public money allocated by Congress for rescuing distressed private financial institutions, and used it to purchase automobile manufacturing companies. 5. He has given our public money to finance foreign automobile companies. 6. He has given our public money to a foreign state to finance

their state-run oil company while refusing to allow us to develop our own oil resources. 7. He has violated the principle of balance of powers by usurping Congress’ role of law maker. 8. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. 9. He has ignored the laws protecting us from the insolvency of financial institutions. 10. He has demanded and implemented Tax-and-Spend laws that inevitably lead to economic collapse. 11. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court based not on ability to interpret the Constitution, but on radical ideology and color of skin. 12. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Czars to harass our people and eat out their substance. 13. He has violated the balance of powers by appointing Czars with far reaching powers who are accountable to no one but himself.

14. He has as a matter of patronage stolen private industries from shareholders and given them to workers’ unions. 15. He has substantially benefited his political financial supporters by giving public money to foreign industries. 16. He has arranged very large unscrupulous deals with private companies to exchange public money for his political advertising. 17. He has attempted to create a public industry, a health insurance company, that would compete with existing and similar private industries in open defiance of the consent of the people, and the letter and intent of the Constitution. 18. He has attempted to annul freedom of speech by setting up an illegal reporting system for recording the names of dissenters and by publicly attacking private citizens who oppose him. 19. He has counted illegal aliens as citizens to skew his standing with Congress. 20. He has illegally fired Inspectors General who found wrongdoing with his political crones. 21. He has attempted to insert himself into even the most personal life experience, our end of life care. 22. He has attempted to refuse to pay for medical treatment for

wounded soldiers. 23. He has refused his assent to Laws of Congress, exercising false powers of veto that are contrary and insubordinate to the Constitution. 24. He has contradicted and violated the rule of law regarding bankruptcy after forcing the failure of one of our largest automakers. 25. He has appointed a Secretary of State who is ineligible for office. 26. He has attempted to force all citizens into mandatory servitude to the government. 27. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our lands, the merciless Islamo-fascist terrorists whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. 28. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 29. He has combined with Communist, Socialists and Fascists to

subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our American character, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation. 30. He has, in collusion with an insolent and irresponsible Congress, imposed Taxes against our consent not only on us, but also on our beloved children and our grandchildren denying them any representation. 31. He has nullified parts of our Constitution, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally our Form of Government.
A President whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant is unfit to be the Chief Executive of a free people. For footnotes and additional information regarding the origin and validity of the 31 reasons listed above, visit one or both of the following links: http://www.amorian.org/2009/09/06/the-big-list-of-reasons-to-impeachbarack-obama/ http://www.amorian.org/the-big-list/ In addition, a lot of people are wondering what it would take to impeach Barack Obama. Here is a good summary about impeachment in general from the American Bar Association website, . http://www.abanet.org/publiced/impeach2.html

Consider the following as well:
1. H.R. 2454 is Barack Obama's "Carbon Cap-and-Trade Bill." This bill would eliminate millions of jobs in American. For example, it would eliminate 200,000 jobs just in the state of Texas. It would give the Federal Government significant control over the Energy Industry, and impose crushing costs on consumers and businesses coast to coast. It would further increase the size of the Federal Government and "is likely to be the biggest tax increase in American history." Plus, and this will blow your mind........ even the man who originated the "Cap-and-Trade" theory in the 1960's, Thomas Crocker, is adamantly opposed to the passage of H.R. 2454. Why? Because, as Thomas Crocker explains, it has no chance of working (i.e., improving the environment) unless every major industrial country on earth agrees to participate. If every country does not participate then Mr. Crocker says, "It's stupid and a complete waste of money and effort." Many countries, including China and Russia have refused to participate. Therefore, obviously, if any nation's President wants to go ahead and implement "Cap-and-Trade" anyway, without every other country committed to a worldwide treaty, then his intent is to knowingly harm his own nation or else, he's just stupid. I don't believe Barack Obama is stupid. I do believe he is a very misguided individual. You can decide for yourself whether or not Obama wants to pass "Cap-and-Trade" to intentionally harm America. The fact remains, "Cap-and-Trade" is so extremely risky and convoluted, that this bill alone may be enough to ruin the US economy for decades to come. The debate on this topic should be as simple as what Thomas Crocker said, "It's stupid."

2. H.R. 3200 is Barack Obama's government controlled health care hoax. It is not about health care. H.R. 3200 is a charade, a sham and nothing more than a political left-wing power grab. This bill will destroy health care in America and further rip apart one of the precious fabrics of this Nation. Why is it so hard for people to understand, "There is no such thing as magic?" Either, the taxpayers have to pay the bills or the Nation defaults on it's financial obligations. Today, every living person in the United States (of every age) would have to pay $349,136.00 to payoff our liabilities. So, let's do the math. How many of you and how many of your children have an extra $349,136.00 laying around to payoff your share of our liabilities? Otherwise, there are two ways to default on our Nation's financial obligations: (1) Refuse to pay and suffer the consequences imposed on us by other Nations around the world, or (2) Default by "devaluation of the US dollar." This means printing more and more money, until we intentionally devalue our own currency to the point where everyone loses; the people we owe money to lose, as well as our own citizens who are left holding currency which is worth next to nothing. In either default scenario everyone loses, except a very few "insiders in the know" who invest appropriately and get out of our currency far ahead of time. H.R. 3200 is ridiculously unaffordable! It's unaffordable, unless you significantly reduce the quality of health care, plus taxpayers pay hundreds of billions of dollars more in taxes for poor government administration, poor care, and also, for coverage for those who don't want health insurance, don't need health insurance or can't afford better health coverage. Including, 33 million illegal aliens, and many more illegal's to come.

Lastly, how are the American people going to respond when the Federal Government starts closing thousands of nursing homes across America because we simply can't afford to keep them open? And too, where are the millions of elderly people currently in those nursing homes going to go when their nursing homes are closed? 3. Senate Bill 560 and H.R. 1409 are Barack Obama's gift to labor unions. These two bills give away worker's rights and employer's rights to labor unions on a "Sliver Platter." The EFCA should be titled the "Employees Forked by Congress Act." Listen very carefully...... there are no citizens anywhere in America asking for this legislation! The only voice in America asking for this legislation is the special interest group know as labor unions (i.e., UAW, SEIU, etc.) Nothing is broken within the National Labor Relation Act and nothing needs to be fixed. Labor laws are already tipped far to unfairly in favor of labor unions. Even to the extent that today it is perfectly legal for unions to blatantly lie to workers during organizing. Maybe there was some justification for allowing unions to lie to workers in 1934, but in today's world it seems unconscionable that our US Government should somehow endorse lying. If the labor law playing field is adjusted at all it should be adjusted more in favor of truth, honesty, integrity and fair play, which is exactly the opposite of what these two bills propose. The supporters of this legislation should be ashamed for even being associated with something as devious and unethical as these two bills. S.B. 560 and H.R. 1409 are deceitful, unconstitutional and nothing more than an "under the table" trade between Barack Obama and Big Labor Unions.

These two bills add no value to anything, anywhere, except to increase the size of Labor Union's bank accounts; and unnecessarily increase the authority of the Federal Government. This legislation harms workers, harms businesses, harms the economy and harms America! At the same time, the legislation makes the Federal Government larger, more expensive and more wasteful. Too, it makes Labor Unions billions of dollars richer, much larger and much more powerful, without unions producing anything or adding value anywhere. This legislation will do the very same thing to the entire Nation that the UAW did to General Motors over the last 50 years. In 1999 General Motors stock was trading at $95.20 per share. On March 5, 2009, General Motors stock was trading at $1.97 per share. Two months ago GM was in bankruptcy. Today, thanks to more than $80,000,000,000 from the American taxpayer, GM is out of bankruptcy and offering totally insane incentives to try and make a go of it. This legislation is anti-employee, anti-business, anti-cooperation, antigrowth and rips at the heart of Freedom in America! At a time when our tax base in the United States should be a major concern for every single individual living in this country, S.B. 560 and H.R. 1409 will drive more jobs overseas and further rip apart one of the basic fabrics of this Nation....... the work place. 4. H.R. 45 is the "Blair Holt's Firearm Act of 2009." Barack Obama, Eric Holder, new Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor and many others in the Administration are aggressive proponents of substantially increased gun control. This has been proven around the world time and again, to be absolutely the wrong thing to do.

5. Senate Bill 773 is the "Cybersecurity Act of 2009." Don't think for one second that this Administration does not want to control the Internet, as well as every other aspect of your life. 6. The "Fairness Doctrine" is the Administrations avenue to shut down talk radio. The "Fairness Doctrine" was repealed by Congress in 1985, but a month does not pass that some Democrat or someone in the Administration doesn't talk about the need to re-institute the "Fairness Doctrine." The dishonestly named "Fairness Doctrine" is something which is horribly bad for America. 7. The US National Debt tonight is $11.9 trillion dollars. The US Unfunded Liability (i.e., Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc.) is $107.4 trillion dollars. The Federal Government intends to borrow an additional $1.5 trillion dollars in 2010. The interest payment alone on our National Debt last year exceeded $450 billion dollars. The United States is collapsing into bankruptcy faster than you can say, "Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin lives in the White House." 8. No one can see the end to the reckless over spending and excessive Government borrowing! Congress has long been out of control with regard to excessive spending. However, this Administration is now spending money four times faster than ever before, with no end in sight and no plan for recovery. The White House and many in Congress act as though: (1) Either, money is free, or (2) They've accepted that financial doomsday is coming soon and they're fine with that prospect.

Tags: OBAMA IMPEACH Publicado por Corazon7 @ 11:48

http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/2009/10/00351-31-reasons-to-impeachpresident-barack-hussein-obama-aka-barry-soetoro.html
==================================================================================

Obama has committed Treason!
July 9, 2010 by danriggsby Filed under Immigration, Impeachment, Obama, Treason

Treason!
Ok, It has happened. Barack Hussein Obama, 44th President of the United States has committed treason. How, you ask? Article III Section III of The Constitution of the United States of America defines treason as:

Section 3. Treason

against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Let’s break it down. Someone who crosses our border illegally with the intention of breaking our laws is a foreign invader, thus an enemy of this nation. Barack Obama has ordered the Justice Department to sue the State of Arizona to prevent it from apprehending foreign invaders. This would be “adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Once the lawsuit was filed, it was admitted to in open court. I believe that Barack Obama should be Impeached and charged with treason and that the only conclusion that the impeachment can draw is guilty and removal from office. http://www.riggsbyreport.com/2010/07/obama-has-committed-treason/

======================================================

Capitol Rush

Proud Supporter and Member of the Virginia Tea Party Coalition, The Tea Party Patriots, The Contract for America and The Fair Tax. God Bless America!
Wednesday, February 23, 2011

IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!

Let me be the first

to call for the impeachment of the

44th President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama on the grounds that he has failed in his constitutional responsibilities to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” On July 4,
1776, the Founders of this great union decided to separate themselves from the tyrannical rule of the King of Great Britain by declaring their independence and on that day in 1776 The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America was adopted. The Declaration of Independence went on to cite various facts that supported the Kings acts of tyranny “over these States” and it was the protection from such future acts that the Constitution of the United States was established. It was documented that the King of Great Britain “has excited domestic Insurrections among us.” Let me argue that Mr. Obama is guilty of similar acts of insurrections when he makes public speeches attacking the sitting Governor of the State Wisconsin for executing his elected duties; while showing favoritism and support for union workers who failed in their contractual obligations by staging unauthorized work stoppages and by disrupting the public domain; and it was Mr. Obama who supported these actions. The King was also called out for “erecting a Multitude of new Offices, and sending hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People.” Mr. Obama is guilty of the same offense by appointing 35 Administrative Czars without the advice and consent of congressional review and who are charged with enforcing Executive Orders issued by the President. This action by Mr. Obama is an attempt to rapidly accelerate power within the executive branch and bypass the constitutional system of

“checks and balances.” Like the King, the President “has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of Large Districts of People” such as his failure to introduce and pass comprehensive immigration laws and secure the border and protect the states against invasion and domestic violence. There is a war being conducted along the Mexican/Arizona border; U.S. citizens are being gunned down and our population is being invaded by undocumented workers and the President and his Justice Department sits idly by. His failure to act is in direct violation of ARTICLE II, Section 1 of the Constitution which states: “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States. In addition, the President is sworn by oath to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States;” and ARTICLE IV, Section 4 “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive against domestic Violence.” Mr. Obama’s most grievous act of tyranny is taking up sides with a foreign entity against the states and citizens of this country. Because of his failure to take aggressive action to enforce federal law 8 U.S.C. § 1304 of the U.S. Code the State of Arizona passed its own legislation SB 1070 which makes it a state misdemeanor crime for an alien to be in Arizona without carrying the required documents, bars state or local officials or agencies from restricting enforcement of federal immigration laws, and cracks down on those sheltering, hiring and transporting illegal aliens. Let me point out that these requirements were first established under federal law 8 U.S.C. § 1304 of the U.S. Code. Arizona’s SB 1070 merely allows the state to execute federal law.

In support of Arizona, several states have jointly filed a Proposed Brief of Amici Curiae. The States of Michigan, Florida, Alabama, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Virginia, along with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, filed their brief that "defends the States' authority to concurrently enforce federal immigration laws, especially in light of the selective and even lack of enforcement of those laws by the Obama administration. Under the current situation, the States have lost control over their borders and are left to guess at the reality of the law." In response, Mexico asked a federal court in Arizona to declare the state’s new immigration law unconstitutional, arguing that the country’s own interests and its citizens’ rights are at stake. And for the first time in America’s history a sitting President of the United States has directed his administration to enjoin with a foreign entity to take action against the people and the State of Arizona. Under his direction, the Obama Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona challenging Arizona's SB 1070 as usurping the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. By supporting the efforts of a foreign entity against his own country, Mr. Obama has failed to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. He has failed to uphold ARTICLE II, Section 1, ARTICLE IV, Section 4, and ARTICLE VI, 3 of the U. S. Constitution and his solemn oath of office. It is based on our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution and applicable law that I suggest that Barack Hussein Obama has failed in his executive duties as President of the United States; has betrayed his solemn oath of office; has failed to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States; has conspired with foreign interests

against the people and the states; and has demonstrated similar acts of tyranny shown by the King of Great Britain and, therefore, should be impeached, tried by the Senate of the United States and removed from office. http://capitolrush.blogspot.com/2011/02/impeach-obama-now.html
By K.J. Rush

==================================================================================

Obama Won’t Uphold Law – Time for

Impeachment!
What the heck is going on in this country? The first half-black allsocialist President just held a press conference to proudly announce he

will not uphold or defend the law! Hmmmm. Isn’t that part of the Oath of Office he took?
By Peter Andrew ConservativeAmerican.org

ConservativeAmerican.org

Which Barack Hosni Obama is this? The one who calls for civility and an end to politicians show in “crosshairs?” The one who could care less about civility or a Governor in the crosshairs when it is his union pals doing it? Who is this man?! Attorney General Eric “Let ‘em Go” Holder and Barack Hugo Obama proudly announced yesterday that they will not only NOT UPHOLD OR DEFEND the law of the land, they will ignore it and stop the effort to see

that it is upheld!! Of course, the issue is the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The President of the United States has decided that not only is he the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, but he also IS THE JUDICIAL BRANCH! Once again, he has simply taken power he does not have. No one challenges him. No one hauls the administration into court or jail. The incompetent and impotent media is silent. What gives the President the right to simply decide that a law, legally passed, is unconstitutional?! Here’s a hint: NOTHING!!! He does NOT HAVE THAT POWER! This is an obscene rejection of the oath he took as President. Obama must be held accountable. He must be impeached and put on trial in the Senate. Enough is enough.

http://conservativeamerican.org/dems-libs-socialists/dems-libs-socialistsobama/obama-wont-uphold-law-time-for-impeachment/

=================================================================================

MICHAEL SAVAGE – IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!! BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!! BEFORE AMERICA IS FINISHED!!-Posted on YouTube.com-By
imitator777-On February 04, 2009:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhJkOz3afFY&feature=related
==================================================================================

Leftist Reporter Predicts Impeachment Drive Success-Posted on
ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-On October 12, 2010:

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/leftist-reporter-predictsimpeachment-drive-success/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=596f2ba400EO_10_12_201010_12_2010&utm_medium=email
==================================================================================

Impeachable Offense: Govt Will Investigate
Obama’s IRS Records Snooping
Posted on October 6, 2010 by Ben Johnson

News has broken today that a federal agency will investigate another

impeachable offense. The U.S. Treasury Department will
launch an investigation into the Obama administration’s allegedly revealing his political opponents’ private tax information to the media.
In late August, an anonymous Obama official (now assumed to be Austan Goolsbee, one of the president’s economic advisors) revealed the tax structure of Koch Industries to the media, information its lawyer,

Mark Holden, said must have been gleaned from confidential IRS forms. The possibly illegal disclosure was part of the administration’s coordinated press offensive against Koch Industries, whose owners, David and Charles Koch, have funded a number of libertarian enterprises that vocally oppose the president’s free-spending agenda. Most notable among these is Americans for Prosperity (AFP), whose state chapters host rallies from coast to coast. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-IA, called for action two weeks ago. Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George said, “As the inspector general charged with ensuring, among other things, the fair implementation of our nation’s system of tax administration…I have ordered the commencement of a review into the matters alleged.” This adds more material to the snowballing avalanche of investigations into the Obama administration’s skirting of the law that could result in the president’s impeachment. The situation is less ideal than it sounds. The Obama administration is essentially investigating itself, and Democrats may be able to hide the details of the president’s wrongdoing George discovers. The Washington Times has added, “Still, Mr. George said that, since Republicans are in the minority, there are some constraints on what he’ll be able to share with the GOP after the review is completed.” Although the development is potentially explosive, the final report could end up providing cover for the administration against genuine examination. This has already happened with the administration’s report trying to excuse the Obama administration’s advocacy for Kenya’s new pro-abortion, pro-Sharia constitution. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) report indicated the Obama administration spent a total of $61.2 million pushing for adoption of the

new constitution. Rep. Chris Smith, R-NJ, has classified this as an impeachable offense revealing “obvious violations of U.S. law.” Yet the official USAID inquest parroted the Obama administration’s claims that it merely encouraged Kenyans to vote, not to vote yes. The evidence seems to suggest otherwise. Smith called the report a “whitewash.” “This is the most superficial report I’ve seen in my 30 years in Congress,” he said. When asked if the administration broke the law, Smith replied, “With this poorly researched, incomplete audit, we still don’t know.” If Republican take the majority in one or both houses of Congress in 2011, that could change. House Republicans, led by Rep. Darrell Issa of California, promise a host of investigations to match an even larger host of shady dealings by this administration – which assumed, with a large Democratic majority in Congress, it would face no accountability. The tax snooping will join likely investigations of the Justice Department’s racial discrimination during the Black Panther Party case. The FBI and the Labor Department have already questioned Andrew Stern, former head of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), for financial improprieties. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-SC, is warning fellow Democrats that a new Republican Congress will investigate Barack Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility. Lt. Col. Robert “Buzz” Patterson told NewsMax that Obama bundler Jodie Evans could (and should) be tried for treason. Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-WI, is considering keeping a House select committee open to investigate climategate. And Congressman Issa has pledged to investigate this and many other crimes in the new year.

There is a reason the Soros-funded Media Matters has attacked Floyd Brown’s call for impeachment. In at least one realm, liberals believe in preemptive war.

Impeachable Offense: Govt Will Investigate Obama’s IRS Records Snooping-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 6, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2391&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=e64bc2e139EO_10_06_201010_6_2010&utm_medium=email
==================================================================================

Calls for

Impeachment

Grow

Calls for the impeachment of Barack Hussien Obama are growing around the country. Here is a link to a call for impeachment in the October 3rd edition of Floridatoday.com. If you see impeachment activities in your community please report them to us. Use the contact form. We are working to try and increase awareness of the thousands of spontaneous calls for impeachment from all corners of America. On Friday, more than 1,000 NASA employees were let go. A few months from now, more than 3,000 NASA employees will lose their jobs. After the shuttle program ends next year, the United States will have to rely on Russia for flights to the International Space Station. Not only will we rely on Russia, but we will have to pay them for this service. The United States is the greatest country in the world, yet we will become subservient to Russia. Why is President Obama making Americans second-class citizens? Why is he constantly preaching that the economy is stabilizing and jobs are

being created, but NASA is depleting its force, and with it, parts of Brevard County will become a ghost town. I know you cannot impeach a president for stupidity. If we could, Obama would be on his way back to Chicago. As far as I’m concerned, I would impeach Obama for being a traitor. During his campaign for the presidency, Obama said we needed change. Is sending our country down the tubes his idea of change? –John J Gaynor Calls for Impeachment Grow-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On October 5, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/10/05/calls-for-impeachment-grow/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=b5a567c988EO_10_05_201010_5_2010&utm_medium=email
==================================================================================

Obama Must be Impeached: He’s Incompetent

Impeachment Campaign Surpasses One Million Petition Signers
For Immediate Release: Contact: July 19, 2010 Floyd Brown (253) 238-8840

ImpeachObamaCampaign.com a project of the Policy Issues Institute is pleased to announce that more than one million Americans have signed their petition in support of the Impeachment of Barack Obama. Articles of Impeachment can only be passed by the US House of Representatives. However, right now, the House is controlled by a majority of Democrats and they are unlikely to change their minds about supporting Obama. But real change is coming, we believe a pro impeachment majority will be elected this November to the US House. While currently no sitting congressmen has supported our efforts, dozens of candidates have expressed support for our campaign. We have organized activists in each of the 50 states and currently they are questioning every candidate about their willingness to support impeachment. We are still collecting signatures on our petition and hope to have over two million by November. Currently over one million letters are arriving in mailboxes nationwide

in support of impeachment. The support of every patriotic American is requested to help us continue to get additional signatures. Also we encourage everyone to ask all candidates if they have read the case for Impeachment, or reviewed the online articles of Impeachment. We have collected over a million signatures, both through the website impeachobamacampaign.com and through direct mail. "Impeachment is a slow process. Immense public support is required to get the movement rolling. Congressmen need to hear from you, and then they will see the light", said Floyd Brown. Brown was one of the originators of the movement to impeach Bill Clinton and is organizing the current effort. Impeachment of Clinton only happened after years of hard work. We expect no less this time.
###

http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/07/19/impeachment-campaign-surpasses-one-millionpetition-signers/
=================================================================================

Impeachment past due

By Michael Oberndorf, RPA Monday, August 2, 2010

Impeachment of the current occupant of the White House is the fastest growing idea in America, today. Each passing day brings new and powerful voices of support. Americans have sat frustrated and helpless for nearly two years, watching the Usurper and his unindicted coconspirators in his administration and the Democrat Party, destroy the country and shred the Constitution, feeling powerless to do anything to stop it. The rising calls for impeachment, from every part of America, from people you’ve heard of and people you haven’t, are changing that. Floyd Brown has a website, that has become so popular that he is moving to a bigger server to handle the traffic. More importantly, his petition to impeach the Great Prevaricator has gone over the million signature mark. Think about it:

over a million Americans, taking a public stance, stating loud and clear that they want Obama impeached for his high crimes and

misdemeanors. Now. He has hard copy petitions, too, that you can
download and go out and collect signatures on, yourself. A handful of sitting and ex-politicians, too, have called for impeachment. They are citing Barack Hussein’s refusal to close, or even protect our borders, and his offer of jobs to two Democrat senate primary candidates, bribes to get them to step aside for party-chosen hacks. When even politicians can’t ignore the lawbreaking, you know it must be real – and serious. At the other end of the spectrum, you have individuals, not members of much of anything, taking matters into their own hands. Out here where I am, the part of the country that liberals, progressives, and other arrogant leftist elitists hold in utmost contempt, the home of racists, rednecks, inbred knuckle-draggers, all of whom own guns (that part is true!), we got tired of waiting for someone else to take action. We came up with a plan for what I think of as guerilla protesting: small groups (as few as two can do this) get a permit (or not, as they choose), make some signs, go out from noon to 1:00 PM on Saturday afternoon to a well-trafficked location in your (or a nearby) town, and show people what you think. We’ve had signs reading, “Impeach Obama, for the Good of the Nation”; “Hand Enough Yet? Impeach Obama!!!”; and “Laws, Not Lies! Impeach Obama!!!” In the last two, the “O” and “G” were hammer-and-sickles. Around a dozen of us, in about four or five hours, have carried the message to somewhere around a couple of thousand others. The point I am making here is that we need not sit idly by while the forces of evil steal our country from us. There are things we can do to let our fellow Americans know what is going on, and that they are neither alone, nor powerless. Obviously, impeachment is a difficult thing to

bring about, especially given present circumstances. And equally obviously, those calling for it are aware of this fact. However, the very act of calling for it – no, DEMANDING it! – carries a strong, unambiguous, unequivocal message to those in power, and those who would take on positions of power: the

American people will NOT tolerate a government that refuses to obey the law, and honor the Constitution. And perhaps most of all, we will NOT tolerate elected officials who will not listen to us. November is only three months away…

Michael Oberndorf, RPA

Michael Oberndorf, RPA Most recent columns The son of a German immigrant, I am an archaeologist by profession, with a BA from Metropolitan State College of Denver, and an MA from Leicester University, in England. I am also the Chairman of the Freedom21 Legislative Committee. Over the years, I have lived and worked all over the country, and traveled in Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, Europe, Australia, and Japan. I sincerely believe in the old saying, “America, love it or leave it.” Michael can be reached at: [email protected]

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26105
==================================================================================

Impeachment suggested to remove 'threats' to
America

'Make no mistake. We're now in the middle of a bloodless coup'

Posted: October 08, 2009

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

A political activist who was behind the famous Willie Horton advertisement that left Gov. Michael Dukakis' candidacy for president floundering and was among the first to sound the alarm on the need for Bill Clinton's impeachment says the United States is collapsing around its citizens right now, but there is a defense. "Make no mistake. We're now in the middle of a bloodless coup – the takeover of an entire nation by the hate-America crowd – a cold-blooded gang that despises America's prosperity, our standing in the world, our

trust in God and our generosity and goodness," says political activist Floyd Brown in a post on the new Impeach Obama Campaign website. His suggested defense is nothing more or less than a strike at the emperor, plans which are detailed on the website. "Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, he [Obama] believes that it's his mission to promote 'equality of outcome' over 'equality of opportunity' even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen," Brown said. "That worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today." Brown said that view also explains why Obama "has already gobbled-up major banks and why the government now controls more and more of our money – yours and mine. And if you wake up one day to discover you're broke, don't be surprised. Barack Hussein Obama is Bernie Madoff with the political power of the presidency at his disposal." "That dangerous worldview explains why his attorney general, Eric Holder, despises the 2nd Amendment. … And that dangerous worldview explains why Obama intends to take away your freedom to choose your own doctor … your own treatment," he said. Brown said there's only one solution to the problem he described as a "monomaniac." "Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: 'The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.'"

Brown told WND that first and foremost, "people need to believe that it's possible." He recalls the campaign to impeach Bill Clinton was begun back in the 1990s when Congress was controlled by the Democrat Party and there was virtually no obvious support for the concept. "But we were patient and we kept at it, and he was impeached," he said. "We believe he [Obama] is not qualified to be president, he should have never been allowed to be president, and [impeachment] is the best process for resolving this situation," he said. Brown said most people remember him for being behind the Horton ad, which highlighted the subsequent crimes of a felon released from prison under Dukakis' watch. He also was among the first to sound the alarm on the Clinton Whitewater scandal as well as the mysterious circumstances of the apparent suicide of White House Counsel Vince Foster. In a WorldNetDaily column, Floyd and Mary Beth Brown write that the idea already is mushrooming among conservatives, such as those in the discussions on the Expose Obama website where Floyd Brown is a moderator. "Radio personality Tammy Bruce may have captured these activists' beliefs about Obama best: 'Ultimately, it comes down to ... the fact that he seems to have, it seems to me, some malevolence toward this country, which is unabated,'" according to the Browns. They argue Obama already is guilty of the "high crimes and misdemeanors" for which the U.S. Constitution provides impeachment as a penalty.

"Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which include: gross incompetence, negligence, and distasteful behavior," they wrote. According to the Impeach Obama Campaign, Obama already has:
•

Lied to the American people when he said people could keep private insurance, knowing full well that his legislation would inevitably drive private insurers out of business. Vindictively fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin, who investigated Kevin Johnson, a buddy of the president, for misuse of funds from an AmeriCorps grant. Supervised the effective takeover by government of banks, the largest insurance company (AIG), and General Motors (GM) and Chrysler, the bulk of the U.S. auto industry, thus depriving bondholders, shareholders, and others of their property. Pursued cap-and-trade legislation. It would in a manner of speaking tax the very air people exhale and give the government unprecedented control over the economy and American businesses.

•

•

•

•

Added a trillion dollars to the national debt in just a handful of weeks. Appointed "Czars" to oversee everything from the closing of Guantanamo to the nation's food. And finally, Obama has consistently refused to approve the release of his actual birth certificate, college transcripts and his medical records.

•

•

Since impeachment proceedings are handled by no one but Congress, Brown writes that it is important now for people to realize the impact of their votes in 2010, because that will determine the makeup of Congress, and very probably whether any impeachment against Obama could proceed. Brown cited a key opinion from former President Gerald Ford, who while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was, "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." "Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this," Brown said. Brown cited his concerns over Obama's attitudes and behaviors, including:
•

When Obama said America is not a Christian nation.

•

When, in his book, Obama wrote of Muslims, "I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." When the White House insisted the name of Jesus be covered before Obama could speak at Georgetown University. When in 2009 Obama said, "You might say that America is a Muslim nation." When he treated the Queen of England with casual familiarity, but bowed to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, where Muslims won't permit Christian worship under penalty of death.

•

•

•

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time. Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at

the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born. Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums probably exceeding $1 million to avoid releasing an original long-form state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions. WND also has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=112098
==================================================================================

Another National Talk Show Host Calls Obama “Impeachable”
Posted on February 28, 2011 by Ben Johnson

The number of people acknowledging that Barack Obama’s lawless actions deserve impeachment has risen by one. Obama’s refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is “impeachable,” according to a nationally syndicated, widely quoted talk show host. Bryan Fischer is director of Issue Analysis for Government and Public Policy at American Family Association and host of “Focal Point,” which is heard on the 148 radio stations of the American Family Radio Network. Fischer wrote on the AFA’s website: Obama is violating his oath of office by refusing to defend DOMA. The Constitution he took a solemn and sacred oath to “preserve, protect and defend” requires him in Article II, Section 3 to “take Care that the Laws

be faithfully executed.” This refusal to do his sworn duty makes him derelict in his duty, and is both inexcusable and even impeachable. Fischer also dedicated a segment of his Thursday program to the DOMA decision. The Christian broadcaster’s influence is only growing. Newsweek magazine (which apparently still exists) paid Fischer a backhanded compliment in a tongue-in-cheek hit piece entitled, “How Bryan Fischer Became the Newest Media Darling.” It describes how Fischer’s straight talking common sense and Biblical conservatism have attracted a growing national audience — a fact that has caused the dinosaur media to frequently distort, mock, and ridicule Fischer’s message and audience. Fischer joins a growing list of center-Right (and occasionally far-Left) personalities who believe the president should be investigated, and perhaps impeached and removed from office. Radio talk show host Tammy Bruce called for Obama’s impeachment for bringing the Muslim Brotherhood closer to power in Egypt. (It would be difficult to think of two people further apart politically than Fischer and Bruce.) Another Bryan, Bryan Preston of Pajamas Media’s blog, put impeachment on the table the day before Fischer’s blog. Within the last two weeks alone Newt Gingrich, ACORN expert Matthew Vadum, and others have stated the president’s actions violate the rule of law, ignore legal precedent, and establish a “rule of men” presided over by Obama — and all have had the courage to say these actions could merit impeachment. Gingrich has since tried to distance himself from the implications of his words, saying, “Congress has every responsibility to demand President

Obama live up to his constitutional obligations, but impeachment is clearly not an appropriate action.” However, Gingrich called the president’s DOMA decision “a dereliction of duty and a violation of his constitutional oath,” which is itself impeachable. The author of Arizona’s immigration law, State Senator Russell Pearce, and former Constitution Party presidential candidate Howard Phillips have stated Obama’s refusal to carry out national immigration laws is impeachable. Phillips recently mailed out a 17-page questionnaire cum indictment of Barack Obama to five million registered voters, asking them if they supported impeaching Obama. It included a section entitled, “Obama Refuses to Enforce Laws He Does Not Like.” Before Congress will act, it must be assured the American people support an action as bold as impeachment. Signed petitions, public pressure, and the increasing number of significant personalities who support impeachment are important steps. Public backlash against this increasingly imperious president shows the growing storm of public disapproval into which Barack Obama is steering his administration. http://floydreports.com/another-national-talk-show-host-calls-obamaimpeachable/
==================================================================================

O'Reilly: Obama Could Face Impeachment If He Pardons Illegals
Saturday, 26 Jun 2010 12:54 PM By Chris Wessling

Fox News' Bill O'Reilly is warning that if President Barack Obama ever bypasses Congress and uses his pardon power to make millions of illegal aliens citizens, he could face serious calls for his impeachment. “If President Obama were to sign an executive order giving illegal aliens amnesty, his career would be over and an impeachment movement would explode,” O'Reilly said Friday night on his “Talking Points” segment during his top-rated Fox show.

At the same time, O'Reilly said he did not believe reports that the Obama administration would grant such a blanket amnesty. Fox News, however, reported this week: “The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com.” The Department of Homeland Security estimates that at least 10.8 million illegal immigrants are living in the United States. During his 2008 campaign, Obama promised pro-immigration and Hispanic groups that he would make an amnesty program a top priority. But such a plan has taken a back seat in favor of other Obama legislative initiatives, including healthcare and financial regulation reform. With congressional elections fast approaching, both the legislative calendar and the climate for new immigration legislation appears to offer immigration legislation a slim chance of passing this year. Republicans, led by Arizona Sen. John McCain, have been angered that Obama has done little to secure the U.S.-Mexico border, and have made that a prerequisite condition before any discussion of immigration reform can take place. Reports that the Obama administration is weighing ways to circumvent Congress have Republicans worried. On Monday, eight Republican senators sent the president a letter saying they are concerned that he will

grant unilateral amnesty to America's illegal immigrant population if his efforts to overhaul current U.S. policy fail in Congress. The letter called on Obama to abandon any attempt to "unilaterally extend either deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States. Such a move would further erode the American public's confidence in the federal government and its commitment to securing the borders and enforcing the laws already on the books." The eight senators who signed the letter were Charles Grassley of Iowa, Orrin Hatch of Utah, David Vitter of Louisiana, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, James Inhofe of Oklahoma and Thad Cochran of Mississippi. GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa told Fox News that the White House has solicited opinions from experts on possible avenues for granting "amnesty for a large number of people." A former Bush administration official also told Fox News that talks on the subject have been held by Obama officials who are "studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it." Republicans believe that Obama is anxious to grant citizenship to millions of illegals so he can add millions of new Democratic voters to the electoral rolls, ensuring his re-election in 2012 and tipping the national balance of power in favor of Democratic candidates for the foreseeable future. O’Reilly also criticized the Obama administration for its lax treatment of the illegal alien issue, noting that Obama had appointed Harold Hurrt

to be the liaison between the federal government and states over the increasingly contentious issue of illegal immigration. Hurrt is the former police chief of Houston and Phoenix, and O'Reilly says he is “outwardly sympathetic to illegal aliens. As [police] chief, he refused to enforce federal immigration law. Now Hurrt is a federal immigration official? Come on, that's insane.” Hurrt's appointment “proves that the president is extremely left on the immigration issue,” O'Reilly said. http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/barack-obama-impeachmentillegal/2010/06/26/id/363160?s=al&promo_code=A296-1
==================================================================================

Tea Partiers' mantra: 'Impeach Obama'
02:34 PM

One of many anti-Obama signs at Thursday's Tea Party rally in downtown Washington, just a few blocks from the White House. CAPTION By Kathy Kiely

"Tea Party" organizers at several events this morning urged activists to focus their attention on eliminating the Democratic majority in Congress this fall, but the focus of most of the anger at an outdoor rally in downtown Washington was definitely the man in the White House.

"He's a socialist," Terry Oldham, a plumber wearing an "Impeach Obama" t-shirt, said of the president. Kyong Ju, a native of South Korea who now lives in Washington, said that Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi "really make me angry." Ju did not look old enough to remember the following characters, but her sign said:

Once we had Ronald Reagan and Bob Hope and John Cash. Now we have Obama. No hope. No cash. Our photo shows you a sign we mentioned in our earlier post. It depicts the president as a vampire with bloody fangs poised over the neck of the Statue of Liberty. Underneath, the sign urged: Impeach Obama. The Tea Party activists will be holding another rally this evening at the Washington Monument. One of the featured speakers: Rep. Ron Paul, who, as we told you earlier this week, one poll showed running neck-andneck with Obama in a hypothetical 2012 presidential race.
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/04/tea-partiers-mantraimpeach-obama/1

==================================================================================

Is it time to whisper the word ‘

impeachment’?

By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, World Net Daily

The Impeach Obama Campaign is gaining steam

At the tea party in Washington, D.C., a popular sign read simply, "Impeach Obama." As a moderator of discussion on the blog www.exposeobama.com, Floyd has observed the discussion of impeachment is mushrooming amongst conservative activists.

Radio personality Tammy Bruce may have captured these activists’ beliefs about Obama best: "Uultimately, it comes down to … the fact that he seems to have, it seems to me, some malevolence toward this country, which is unabated." But has Barack Obama committed an impeachable offense? What exactly constitutes an impeachable offense? Former President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was "whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution reads:

"The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
Here’s a passage from C-Span.org that succinctly summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Constitution: "’High crimes and

misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other "great and dangerous offenses" might not be covered … so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase wellknown in English common law. In 18th-century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior."

In other words, "high crimes and misdemeanors" does not refer to a criminal act. Our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the president for actions which include: gross incompetence, negligence and distasteful behavior. For those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of "playing politics," the founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting president be a political act. As C-Span.org notes: "The Congress decides the definition [of impeachable offenses]: by majority vote in the House for impeachment, and by two-thirds vote in the Senate for conviction. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment." Impeachment is no more or less than the recall of an elected official who isn’t up to the job. Obama deserves recall much more than Gov. Gray Davis, and he was replaced by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in a special recall election Oct. 7, 2003, in California. America is a monument to the triumph of freedom. When Barack Obama thinks about freedom, he sees a world in which some people, due to personal initiative and good fortune, will do better than others. In that regard, he is right. But Barack Obama sees that as unfair. Where you see freedom, liberty and the opportunity for any American to be all that he or she can be, Obama sees greed and bigotry. Like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, he believes that it’s his mission to promote "equality of outcome"

over "equality of opportunity." This worldview makes Barack Hussein Obama a very dangerous man, and a threat to your personal liberty. Worldview explains why he has gobbled-up major banks and why the government now controls more and more of our money. And if you wake up one day to discover you’re broke, don’t be surprised. Barack Hussein Obama is Bernie Madoff with the political power of the presidency at his disposal. Worldview explains why Obama intends to take away your freedom to choose your own doctor and your own treatment. Wherever government controls health care, bureaucrats decide who gets treatments, transplants, dialysis and costly medication. The groundswell of calls for the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama is growing.
http://www.exposeobama.com/2009/10/09/is-it-time-to-whisper-the-wordimpeachment/

==================================================================================

Impeach the Marxist Muslim Ba***** & his Maoist Whores!
by sheikyermami on October 18, 2009

What? What’s that? the Obama is not a legitimate American?
Check this out, here

Impeach the Marxist Muslim POTUS!

“Can you hear us now?” asked protesters around the country this weekend, challenging the mainstream media to drop a perceived news bias and give fair coverage to the growing movement against Obama administration policies.

Grassroots organizers pulled together small groups of protesters in dozens of U.S. cities yesterday and today, including more than 100 who descended upon the offices of the Florida’s St. Petersburg Times this morning. “The press needs to be unbiased,” Joe Sekola, an organizer of a group called the North Pinellas 9.12 Project, told the Times. “You guys are (supposed to be) the watchdogs.” More from WND

Mao Fan Anita Dunn blames dead Republican for quoting Mao Dunn has no class whatsoever. First she makes that tacky speech saying Mao is one of her favorite political philosophers and then she blames a dead

Republican when she’s caught on video spouting this putrid Leftie mishmash. Gates of Vienna / Read further…

Maoist Van Jones already went under the bus…

Re verse the coup d’etat on the White House! Barack Obama’s Anti-Semitic Website

Spencer: As noted many times here, Barack Obama has never shown much respect for the freedom of speech, or any interest in protecting it — quite the contrary. However, he shows no interest in restricting genuine and vile hate speech on his own website. “Barack Obama’s Anti-Semitic Website,” by Pamela Geller at Big Government, October 17: During the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama’s website, Organizing for America – over which Obama has editorial control — played host to a series of vile anti-American, Jew-hating posts and pieces. It was overwhelming. There were numerous, heinous calls for Jewish genocide and incitement to hatred. And it is happening again, right now, on the official website of the man who is supposedly the leader of the free world. The site was and is closely policed. The site moderators remove material that they consider to be “disrespectful to our other users” and to “detract from a welcoming community where all people can engage in positive discourse.” What they find disrespectful can be interesting: once during the campaign a conservative blogger, Bill Levinson, posted a blog on Obama’s website consisting entirely of a series of quotations from Obama’s own book, Dreams of my Father. Obama’s team did not approve of their standard-bearer’s words, and so Levinson’s blog and account were deleted from the Obama site in just under 36 hours. That’s right, Barack Obama’s website banned Obama’s own words. But the most disgusting anti-semitic ravings remained on the site, along with blogs advocating anarchy and the overthrow of the United States Congress. [...] Continuing the lies and blood libels, the post claims: “Worse than the Nazis Israeli forces used to invade peaceful Palestinian towns, execute men, women and children in cold blood everywhere and anywhere they encounter them, dynamite their homes on top of their residents, and finally demolish the whole town making room for new Israeli colonies.” It charges that Israel pursued “a pre-meditated genocidal plan” against the Palestinian Arabs.

Suffice to say that this entry passed muster with Obama’s moderators and is clearly acceptable to Obama for America. Why hasn’t Obama stopped the terrible hate speech he was hosting on his site? This has been going on for well over a year. And it continues. He knows the anti-semites post these blood libels on his website. So why does he retain the platform as President of the United States? It’s evil. Why does he encourage it with his silence? Is Obama an anti-semite? By his fruits we shall know him, and so we know him. Read it all.

How Obama’s team looks to Mao for his message
Andrew Bolt Barack Obama’s communications boss names mass-murderer Mao as one of her two “favorite political philosophers”. Roger Kimball laughs at the excuses made for her since. So Obama, whose pastor was a hate-whitey race-baiter, not only has a far Left background himself, but has surrounded himself with aides who reflect his campus radical chic. For instance: Van Jones, the onetime Marxist whose controversial statements about Republicans and 9/11 have made him a distracting lightning rod as Barack Obama’s environmental jobs czar in recent days, resigned tonight… , Jones was forced to apologize when a video surfaced of his February remarks in Berkeley, of all places, using a reference to a lower anatomical orifice to describe Republicans. The next day Jones again had to apologize for having his signature on a petition to then N.Y. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer seeking an investigation

into the 9/11 attacks as possibly an inside job planned by then-Pres. George W. Bush to soften opposition to a war in Iraq. And: Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens…. These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology— informally known as the United States’ Science Czar.
http://sheikyermami.com/2009/10/18/impeach-the-marxist-muslim-bastard-hismarxist-whores/

==================================================================================

Administration’s inaction criminal and impeachable
September 25th, 2010 LAIGLESFORUM Posted

in Constitution, Immigration | 8 Comments »

Constitution: Obama guilty of treason, must be impeached
By Don Hank

I recently published a column on the gradual seizure of ranches in Arizona by Mexican cartels with the tacit consent of the current administration. I need to clarify that any person in a position such that he/she can be reasonably expected to be protecting US assets (US president, Homeland Security Chief, Border Patrol chief, etc) and who refuses to protect said assets is on a par with — but in fact is more culpable than — the actual perpetrators (in this case, the cartels, Mexican criminals and other invaders) of the harm to the assets. This means that these people are liable and must be brought to justice as soon as possible. Obama and his administration have made it clear that they not only will not meaningfully defend our borders and perform a modicum of their duties to protect American lives and assets (see the definition of security in the above-linked column). They have in fact clearly sided with the criminals, aiding and abetting them in harming a state and its citizens. Suing the state of AZ for protecting borders that can be expected to be

protected by the federal government and is their duty to protect under the Constitution, is nothing short of treachery. Here are the parts of the Constitution that are being directly violated – first an Article that applies indirectly, then an Article that applies directly: “Art. IV, Section 3: ….The Congress shall have the Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the US; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any claims of the US or of any particular State.” The Obama administration has “construed” the Constitution “so as to prejudice the claims of” a “particular State” (AZ). That is a flagrant violation of the Constitution. Further, and more directly: The administration has violated Section 4 of Art. IV, which clearly states: “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a Republican form of government and shall protect each of them against Invasion….” There is no wiggle room here for the Executive. Obama and the agencies subordinate to him, must protect the states against invasion and they are failing to do so, in flagrant violation of Constitutional Article IV. In fact, they are illegally suing AZ under color of law in an attempt to cover their tracks.

This passive refusal to protect a state and the pro-active frivolous and malicious lawsuit against AZ for attempting to defend itself amount to one of the grounds for impeachment explicitly enumerated under Article II, Section 4, because the inaction on the one hand and the active step on the other hand are quite simply treason. There can be no other word for it. It does not matter what the Supreme Court says. Each state has the right to decide whether the government has denied them aid. Regardless of this, it is time for the states to defend themselves against all blatant violations of their Constitutional rights, whether these violations be perpetrated by the Executive or a higher court, including the SC. When a higher court violates the Constitution, it is up to the people (on the state level first) to assert their rights and just say no — as Sheriff Joe Arpaio has done, BTW, in refusing to provide documents improperly requested by the feds. Arpaio is in his right under the 10th Amendment, which states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The Constitution does not grant to the federal government the right to interfere with law enforcement activities on the State level. Nor did AZ, according to this same Amendment, have to accept the intervention of the higher court to hamstring their immigration law. They chose to do so. It needs to be recognized, in this regard, that Jan Brewer is willing to defend AZ only in part, but not in whole. She is

behaving first as a politician and, as a distant second, as a defender of her State and its Constitutional rights. Her endorsement of John McCain is evidence that she is only willing to half-heartedly defend her people. The fact that the people chose McCain in the primary election is evidence that they are willing to allow the tail to wag the dog. They have not fully grasped the Tea Party principles and the significance of the Constitution. And there is one salient reason for this: Neither Brewer nor the people have actually read the Constitution she is sworn to uphold. The government is not about to protect us from invasion without a significant change, and that change starts with education on the grassroots level. No significant steps toward securing our nation will be taken until the Articles mentioned above are read and understood by a majority of the people. Administration’s inaction criminal and impeachable-Posted on Laigle’s ForumBy Don Hank-On September 25, 2010:

http://laiglesforum.com/administrations-inaction-criminal-andimpeachable/1821.htm

==================================================================================

Impeach Obama Rally in San Diego
Posted by admin on September 2, 2010

This movement won’t be suppressed. Rallies are appearing all over the country in support of Impeachment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=0qnYqYjp4n4&feature=player_embedded

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/impeach-obama-rally-in-san-diego/? utm_source=Floyd+Reports&utm_campaign=5a11e5c71bFR_09_02_20109_2_2010&utm_medium=email

=================================================================================

Texas Dems Want to IMPEACH Obama
By Hilary Hylton / Austin Sunday, Jun. 20, 2010

Kesha Rogers, winner of the U.S. Democratic Party primary election in Texas's 22nd congressional district

South Carolina's unexpected Democratic nominee for the US Senate, mystery man Alvin Greene, says he wants to play golf with Barack Obama. But in Texas, another surprise Democratic primary winner, congressional nominee Kesha Rogers, wants to impeach the President. So while South Carolina party officials are still unsure of what to do about Greene's success at the ballot box, Texas Democrats have no such reservations — they wasted little time in casting Rogers

into exile and offering no support or recognition of her campaign to win what once was Republican Majority Leader Tom DeLay's old seat. Rogers, 33, told TIME she is a "full time political activist" in the Lyndon LaRouche Youth Movement, a recruiting arm of the LaRouche political organization that is active on many college campuses. The LYM espouses LaRouche opposition to free trade and "globalism" (the UN, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund) and it also calls for a return to a humanist classical education, emphasizing the works of Plato and Leibnitz. On her professional looking campaign website, kesharogers.com, she touts the LaRouche political philosophy — a mix of support for the economic policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the impeachment of President Obama — and calls Obama a "London and Wall Street backed puppet" whose policies will destroy the Democratic Party. During the campaign, she was photographed carrying an oversized portrait of the President with a Hitler-style moustache penciled on his lip. (See TIME's photos: Crawford, Texas, circa 2009) Texas' 22nd district is a relatively conservative, primarily suburban area west and south of Houston that includes — thanks to DeLay's redistricting efforts — the NASA Johnson Space Center and surrounding aerospace industries, where residents have expressed concerns about cuts in manned space programs. Another major LaRouche-inspired plank in Rogers' platform is support for the colonization of Mars. "Help send me to Congress, and we can send our grandchildren to Mars!" was a Rogers' slogan during the campaign. Unlike South Carolina's Greene, Rogers ran a high profile campaign, staking out a corner on a major intersection in the district to appear almost daily with a large sign: "Save NASA. Impeach Obama." She garnered 7,467 votes, 53% of the vote, in a three way race that included a local information systems analyst Doug Blatt, who gained endorsements from local Democratic clubs and labor groups, and Freddie John Weider Jr., a preacher and onetime Libertarian candidate; Blatt came in second with 28% of the vote and Weider won 20%. "The people of the 22nd district voted for me," she said. "They recognized the party is not acting in the interests of the people."

"There wasn't a lot of money in the race," Anthony Gutierrez, deputy executive director of the Texas Democratic Party said. "We probably could have done a better job of educating the voters on what the candidates' positions were." All three candidates raised similar amounts, according to Federal Election Commission reports. Rogers raised $16,000, mostly from individual contributions, while Blatt received $2,600 from the Democratic Party and spent $12,650 of his own money. Unlike in South Carolina, the TDP can't really claim it was blindsided. Rogers' LaRouche connections and banner-waving activities were detailed in the local media and she ran for the state party chair in 2006. Gutierrez knows the 22nd well — he was the campaign manager for Nick Lampson, the last Democrat to successfully hold the seat following DeLay's midterm resignation. In 2008, the popular Lampson even outperformed Obama in the district, as Democrats poured major resources in an attempt to hold it, Gutierrez said. But Lampson still lost in a three way race to Congressman Pete Olsen, the Republican who currently holds the seat — 52% to 45%, with the Libertarian Weider pulling a little over 2% of the vote. Lampson did as well as any Democrat could hope to do in the district, given its configuration, Gutierrez said, and party resources this year were better spent in more winnable races. Democrats have their eye on state races this year, hoping former Mayor Bill White will oust Gov. Rick Perry and Democrats can retake the statehouse and control the redistricting process. Meanwhile, the state party has adopted a resolution denying any party support for Rogers, citing the alleged racist and discriminatory views of the LaRouche movement — allegations that Rogers, who is African-American, firmly rejects. District 22 has also been stricken from the party's official online list of congressional races. "No, I can't explain the result in CD 22," Houston progressive blogger Charles Kuffner wrote on his blog, Off the Kuff. "Stuff just happens sometimes, especially in races where not much attention is being paid." One theory, according to a Democratic Party insider, is Rogers benefitted from her name being in the top position on the Fort Bend County ballot, where African-American Democratic interest was high in two local races. But Rogers rejects that notion. "I went to senior citizens centers. I was knocking on doors

everywhere — everyone knew my positions, " she told TIME. "I don't think the Democratic Party leadership is getting it. The people continue to see more and more economic devastation and they don't see any real leadership." And for now, the party leadership will pretend that it can't see Rogers. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1998076,00.html

==================================================================================

Impeach the stonewalling Obama
Posted: June 01, 2010 1:00 am Eastern © 2011

I can think of many reasons to impeach Barack Obama.

Of course, this House of Representatives is never going to do that between now and January, when many of the members will be leaving office, most of them against their wishes. But it's actually time to start calling for impeachment. There are dozens of crimes and misdemeanors to consider, with the dozens of brazen extra-constitutional actions of this White House – from health care to auto-company takeovers to bank bailouts. And, of course, there is the ever-present controversy over his total failure even to prove his constitutional eligibility for office. But Obama's stonewalling over the allegations of Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., is the most Nixonian reason of all. Now the shoe is clearly on the other foot. Sign the petition demanding an investigation of allegations that Obama illegally attempted to bribe Rep. Sestak While Democrats were prepared to frog-march Richard Nixon out of the White House in the 1970s because of his refusal to allow an independent counsel to investigate Watergate, today's Democrats expect the American people to take the administration's word that Sestak, one of their own, is lying when he said he was offered a bribe to bow out of the U.S. Senate race against Sen. Arlen Specter. Late last week, the White House finally released its explanation of the job offer. The claim is that Rahm Emanuel sent Bill Clinton to meet with Sestak to offer an unpaid advisory position – not the "high-ranking position" Sestak had claimed.

It took the White House 10 weeks to come up with this highly unbelievable explanation that conflicts entirely with Sestak's own repeated claims. Sestak needs to be placed under oath by an impartial, independent investigator with subpoena power to see what he has to say about this. So does Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton – not that the latter has any respect for being under oath, as we know from previous experience. This explanation hardly passes the smell test of credibility. Rahm Emanuel is known as a sharp-as-nails political operative. What would make him think that Sestak would give up a chance to be a U.S. senator for an unpaid advisory job? It makes no sense. Remember what Sestak said back in February to start this controversy: that he was offered a "high-ranking federal job" to get out of the race. He has not deviated from that story in 10 weeks. Then, just two days before the first official explanation of the story, the White House met with Sestak's brother. One day before the first official explanation, Obama met with Clinton. And why did Sestak not tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the American people for the last 10 weeks? Now that everyone has had a chance to get their stories in synch, an independent investigation may be too late. The cover-up may be complete. That's why members of Congress, the media and the public have been clamoring for a special counsel to be named by Obama's hapless and highly partisan attorney general, Eric Holder.

It's not as if Obama's White House hasn't been accused of similar bribes in the past. Last September, the Denver Post reported that Obama's deputy chief of staff, Jim Messina, offered Colorado Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff a position in the administration if he canceled plans to run against Sen. Michael Bennet. Is it not plausible to assume the Obama White House might try bribery a second time, having gotten away with it the first time? There's a lot to investigate here. And, unlike Watergate, all of the alleged corruption involves Democrats. It involves a White House trying to control another supposedly independent branch of government using power and taxpayer funds illegitimately and illegally. You know what they said back during the Nixon scandals: The cover-up is worse than the crime. Yes, it's time to start talking about impeachment. Ultimately, that was the only thing that shook the truth out of the trees during Watergate.
Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate. He is the author or co-author of 13 books, including his latest, "The Tea Party Manifesto: A Vision for an American Rebirth," and his classic, "Taking America Back: A Radical Plan to Revive Freedom, Morality and Justice," now in its third edition and 14 printings. Farah is the former editor of the legendary Sacramento Union and other major-market daily newspapers.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php? fa=PAGE.view&pageId=160669

Is It Time to Impeach the Stonewalling Obama?
http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/is-it-time-to-impeach-thestonewalling-obama/

=================================================================================

June 21, 2010

Should Pres. Obama Resign Over Feb. 13?

By Kevin McCullough

While defending his own policies President Obama has routinely been rude and sarcastic to his predecessor, George W. Bush. Yet Obama appears to be making the resident of the previous White House look like a genius compared to his own serious missteps in office.

Case in point – Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's performance and the communication of priorities on the issue of oil rig safety in the Gulf of Mexico.

It seems incomprehensible that the president and other members of the administration still have jobs when it is now being reported that the federal government was apprised by BP on February 13 that the Deepwater Horizon oil rig was leaking oil and natural gas into the ocean floor.

In fact, according to documents in the administration's possession, BP was fighting large cracks at the base of the well for roughly ten days in early February.

Further it seems the administration was also informed about this development, six weeks before to the rig's fatal explosion when an engineer from the University of California, Berkeley, announced to the world a near miss of an explosion on the rig by stating, "They damn near blew up the rig."

It's also now being reported that BP was asking for the administration's help on this matter long before the deadly accident and the now gushing well of tar.

Which leads me to some questions for the president. If I were in front row of reporters in the White House briefing room, here’s what I’d like to know:

1. It appears, Mr. President, that you were informed by BP about problems on Deepwater Horizon on February 13 and the company wanted your help. What did you say?

2. Given this new revelation, Mr. President, how can you can sleep at night knowing that your inaction cost the lives of eleven men in Louisiana?

3. Did you inform the victims' families about these facts when you invited them to the White House for last month's photo op?

4. You've said, Mr. President, time and again, that the buck stops with you. Doesn’t that statement seem like something bordering on propaganda when you follow it up with what appears to be a false sense of outrage by telling Matt Lauer that you're looking for rear ends to kick?

5. Does the buck stop with you… or not?

6. Are you going to insist that Mr. Salazar step down from his post in disgrace and shame?

7. Will you hold another prime time television press conference and tell the entire truth to the American people? -- These would be the actions of a man who says that the buck "stops" with him.

8. I know when this news was breaking midday on Saturday about the latest BP developments that you and the Vice President were out on the golf course. Was it 39th or 40th time you've played a round in 18 months? (Just for a point of reference President Bush played golf 24 times in eight years.) Never mind, your priorities are for you to decide. At least until election night...

And now here's where I would not be able to stop myself from saying more...

It is one thing, Mr. President, to be forced to deal with unexpected circumstances and to have to deal with genuinely new problems. President Bush sure had to. He had to respond to an attack on our homeland that took the lives of 3,000 of our fellow citizens. But on his watch no other terrorist actions took lives of Americans on our soil, largely due to his steadfast leadership and willingness to accept no excuses on the matter.

But Mr. President, you seem to have very little leadership experience and it appears you have even less skill. Being a good dad and nice guy who sees the world as he wishes it to be is not exactly a resume of exacting leadership.

Your advisers have failed you and you have failed the American people on nearly everything we've asked of you.

Where you go from here is really your call, but you should consider two options if you genuinely love the country you work for and those of us you report to.

First, change your tactics. Second, appear to care. Attempt to engage and empower Americans who can and will go solve this mess.

Otherwise resign.

For the good of the nation, for your own children's future, change your patterns or change your path... but change!

You do remember that word don't you, Mr. President?
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of "'Baldwin/McCullough Radio" now heard on 213 stations and columnist based in New York. He blogs at www.muscleheadrevolution.comHis second book "The Kind Of MAN Every Man SHOULD Be is in stores now. And host of "The Kevin McCullough Show" weekdays 7a-9am EST on Sirius 161/XM 227.

http://nation.foxnews.com/obama-administration/2010/06/21/should-pres-obamaresign-over-feb-13
================================================================================== +=================================================================================

-

Enough is enough. We're calling for the Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama. And if you agree, you can join us right now. Right here and right now, you can add your voice to ours... and add your name to the Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama. Why are we calling for the Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama? Radio-personality Tammy Bruce may have said it best: "... ultimately, it comes down to... the fact that he seems to have, it seems to me, some malevolence toward this country, which is unabated." Oh... there are many reasons to call for the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama and there is more than just cause to call for his impeachment. But as Bruce said, Obama's "unabated malevolence toward this country, which is unabated" makes it all the more imperative that we take action now... without delay. How long must we wait... how long should we sit back and permit Barack Hussein Obama to rip apart the fabric of this country before we take action?

Are you terrified at Barack Obama’s campaign to change our country into a third-world nation? Are you willing to sit back and watch Obama bulldoze our great nation? Are you willing to let him construct a totalitarian regime... fascism, socialism, Obamaism... take your pick? If any of the above scenarios concern you... join us. At the very least, fire a shot across the bow... a shot that will be heard around the world... and send Barack Hussein Obama a clear and unmistakable message that he does not have carte blanche to ruin the United States of America. As the late former President Ronald Reagan once said, "If not us, then who; if not now, then when."

Can we actually impeach Barack Hussein Obama? Should we impeach Barack Hussein Obama?

To borrow a phrase from the "anointed-one," ... "yes we can." But before going on, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Obama's actions are grave enough to warrant impeachment. Former-President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was, “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” The key phrase here is "high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. "High crimes and misdemeanors" essentially means bad behavior. Here's a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly

and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Constitution: “’High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment - treason and bribery - were not enough. He worried that other "great and dangerous offenses" might not be covered... so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior." In other words, "high crimes and misdemeanors" does not refer to a criminal act (as some would lead you to believe) and our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were... well... simply put... egregious... grossly incompetent... grossly negligent... outright distasteful... or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show "malevolence toward this country, which is unabated." And make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of "playing politics," the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting President be a political act.

As C-Span.org notes: “The Congress decides the definition [of impeachable offenses]: by majority vote in the House for impeachment, and by 2/3 vote in the Senate for conviction. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment. Then Representative Gerald Ford put it into practical perspective in 1970, when he said an impeachable offense is ‘whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.’" The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history. Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this. It could be easily argued that we have a duty to

impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won't have the backbone to go it alone. That's where you come in. Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that Impeachment is the will of the American people and they ignore the will of the people at their own political peril. The question is not whether we should impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we impeach Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late?

A personal introduction is in order. My name is Floyd Brown. Most people know me as the man behind the infamous Willie Horton Ad that sunk the presidential aspirations of Governor Michael Dukakis, or for the pivotal work in support of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas. I was also among the first to sound the alarm on the Clinton Whitewater scandal as well as the mysterious circumstances surrounding the apparent suicide of

White House Counsel Vince Foster during the early Clinton years. And when it comes to the subject of impeachment, I've been down this road and trod this ground before. I was among the first, to rally for the impeachment of Bill Clinton back in the summer of 1994 when it was not a popular subject with the political elites (on both sides of the aisle) in Washington. It was a massive, difficult and historical undertaking. But the House of Representatives did eventually advance Articles of Impeachment against Bill Clinton and 45 and 50 United States Senators respectively voted to convict Bill Clinton on the two counts that were advanced in the Senate. That's nothing to sneeze at... nothing to be ashamed of... . And when it comes to the subject of the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama, I'll say this much... Barack Hussein Obama is no Bill Clinton. There's an old expression; you're known by the company you keep. However, I also believe that there is no truer

barometer of a person's character and effectiveness in battle than those who stand in opposition to that person and things they say about that person. And, to be quite blunt, liberals, for years now, have foamed at the mouth at the mention of my name. During the presidential election, CNN called me; "An old right-wing attack dog has returned with a new target: Barack Obama." George Stephanopoulos once called me "a slimy thug for hire." Not a true statement by any stretch of the imagination, but coming from Stephanopoulos, I consider it a compliment. My mother always used to say, "consider the source." Of course, the purpose of telling you all of this is not to blow my horn but rather to let you know that when it comes to this movement to impeach Barack Hussein Obama... we're deadly serious... we're dedicated... we're in it for the long haul... we're willing to do what it takes to get the job done... and we have the battle-scars to prove it.

Hussein Obama is one of the most dangerous men in the

And yes, I believe that Barack

world today and when it comes to his plans for
transforming the United States into his idea of a socialist utopia... you ain't seen nothing yet.

Removing Barack Hussein Obama is an imperative for this country.

Make no mistake. We’re now in the middle of a bloodless coup – the takeover of an entire nation by the hate-America crowd – a cold-blooded gang that despises American's prosperity, our standing in the world, our trust in God and our generosity and goodness. America is a monument to the triumph of freedom. When Barack Obama thinks about freedom, he sees a world in which some people, due to personal initiative and good fortune, will do better than others... live better than others. And in that regard, he is right. But Barack Obama sees that as unfair. Where you see freedom, liberty and the opportunity for any American to be all that he or she can be, Obama sees greed and bigotry.

And, like so many on the far-left before him, going all the way back to Karl Marx, he believes that it's his mission to promote "equality of outcome" over "equality of opportunity" even if Americans must learn to live in chains to make it happen (in fact, servitude to the iron will of government will be required).

Hussein Obama a very dangerous man and one of the greatest threats to your personal liberty today.
That dangerous worldview also explains why he has already gobbled-up major banks and why the government now controls more and more of our money – yours and mine. And if you wake up one day to discover you’re broke, don’t be surprised. Barack Hussein Obama is Bernie Madoff with the political power of the presidency at his disposal. That dangerous worldview explains the sudden and shocking erosion of your freedom to make a living, to run your own business, whether a Mom-and-Pop grocery store or General Motors. That dangerous worldview explains why his Attorney General, Eric Holder, despises the 2nd Amendment... why, if he had his way, he would take away our guns, leaving us defenseless against gangs and hoods – and,

That worldview makes Barack

more to the point, against Obama's own shock-troops from ACORN or SEIU. Remember, it was the healthy and rational fear of government that led to the inclusion of the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution of the United States. And that dangerous worldview explains why Obama intends to take away your freedom to choose your own doctor... your own treatment. Wherever government controls health care, bureaucrats decide who gets treatments... who gets transplants... who gets dialysis... who gets costly medication... and who needs to die for the common good. What can we do to stop this monomaniac... this American dictator? There’s only one answer. Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Here are just a handful of the high crimes and misdemeanors committed by Barack Hussein Obama.

He lied to the American people when he said we could keep our private insurance, knowing full well that his legislation would inevitably drive private insurers out of business. Gerald Walpin, Inspector General of the Corporation For National and Community Service investigated Kevin Johnson, a big buddy of the president, for misuse of funds from an AmeriCorps grant. Whereupon Obama vindictively fired Walpin to cover for Johnson. A subsequent investigation vindicated Walpin’s judgment in the matter. Barack Hussein Obama has overseen the effective takeover by government of banks, the largest insurance company (AIG), and General Motors (GM) and Chrysler... the bulk of the U.S. auto industry, thus depriving bondholders, shareholders, and others of their property. Barack Hussein Obama is actively pursuing cap-andtrade legislation. Instead of taxing the very air we breathe, it would instead, in a manner of speaking, tax the air we exhale and give the government unprecedented control over the economy and American businesses. Barack Hussein Obama is running up our debt at an alarming rate. In just 9 months since Obama assumed

office, our National Debt has gone up by over a trillion dollars. To put that figure in perspective, it took George W. Bush 8 years to add 4.8 trillion to the National Debt. And, to add insult to injury, we're printing money like it's going out of style. The effect will be hyper-inflation, a crippling of our economy and, quite possibly, personal hardship on a scale that has not been experienced since the Great Depression. Barack Hussein Obama has appointed countless “Czars” to oversee everything from the closing of Guantanamo to the food we eat. These Czars don’t have to be approved by the Senate. The Czars have unprecedented power and report only to Obama. Members of both parties are disturbed by these extraConstitutional excrescences. Senator Robert Byrd said: “The accumulation of power by White House staff can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances.” Congressman Jack Kingston called the Czars a “parallel government.” And finally, Obama has consistently refused to approve the release of his actual birth certificate, college transcripts and his medical records. And these matters only scratch the surface.

It's almost as if Obama is intentionally trying to destroy the country.

Barack Hussein Obama has said that America is not a Christian nation, on countless occasions, despite surveys that find a whopping majority say the contrary. In his book, The Audacity of Hope, he wrote of Muslims and Arabic immigrants: “… I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” When he spoke at Georgetown University, a Catholic institution, the White House insisted that the name of Jesus, be covered. Georgetown complied. In 2006, he said; "Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation." He went to Egypt and said, "You might say that America is a Muslim nation." Why go to such lengths to deny the Christian heritage of the United States? Surely Barack Hussein Obama knows that our personal liberties flow directly from our Christian heritage... that there is no surer way to destroy our republic than to deny that heritage.

President Thomas Jefferson: "God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?" President Andrew Jackson called the Bible; "the Rock upon which our republic rests.” President John Adams said; “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.” Patrick Henry said, “It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains.” George Washington, in his Farewell Address said; "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports." Alexis de Tocqueville, in Democracy in America, wrote extensively on the relationship between the Christian religion and liberty in American: "America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." It's enough to make one wonder... does Barack Hussein Obama realize that every stab he takes at the

Christian heritage of this great nation is a blow to the very foundation of our nation... a blow to freedom our personal liberty? Does he simply hate Christianity... does he hate the United States... or both?

Barack Hussein Obama simply hasn't denied the Christian heritage of this nation. He has used his presidency to bad-mouth America itself at every turn. He said, "America has been arrogant." thus giving our enemies and our allies every reason to believe that we are less resolved to defend ourselves and hence more vulnerable to attack. Following his inauguration, he ordered Gitmo closed, within a year, despite the fact that it was (and is) the best possible facility for detaining terrorists. His first presidential phone call was to Mahmoud Abbas, leader of the Fatah Party in the Palestine territory. According to press reports he told Abbas;

"This is my first phone call to a foreign leader and I'm making it only hours after I took office." His first one–on-one TV interview was not with NBC or ABC, but with Al Arabiya, where he said: “My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect.” He immediately issued an Executive Order halting military commissions which resulted in charges being dropped against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the animal accused of planning numerous terrorist attacks against Americans, including the USS Cole bombing in which 17 U.S. sailors died. While treating the Queen of England with casual familiarity, he obsequiously bowed from the waist to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, leader of a Muslim nation that won’t permit Christian worship within its borders... under penalty of death. Are Obama's denunciations of America, in words and deeds, simply faux-pas or do they show, as Tammy Bruce said, "malevolence toward this country, which is unabated." Does it really matter? Barack Hussein Obama's words and actions clearly

rise well beyond the level of "bad behavior" and our Founding Fathers left us a remedy for presidents guilty of bad behavior. The Obama presidency is the disease; Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution, is the cure. You can join us by using the sign-up button below to read and then add your name to the Articles of Impeachment we've drawn-up against Barack Hussein Obama. If, after reading the Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama, you agree that action must be taken now, all you have to do to join our growing network of patriotic Americans is add your name (which will remain on our secure form and be kept in the strictest confidence until the time is right) to the Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama. That's all there is to it. Be among the first to join this growing nationwide movement and help us spread the word far-and-wide. Together, we can take back our country

before it is too late.

Floyd Brown
ImpeachObamaCampaign.com is a project of the Policy Issues Institute. Contributions are not deductible for tax purposes. 30011 Ivy Glenn Dr., Suite 223 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

==================================================================================

Impeach Obama Now: Seen Around Town and Elsewhere
February 27, 2011 By RidesAPaleHorse

Impeach Obama Now: Land, Sea and Air Land, Sea and Air: More on “Impeach Obama Now!”

-

-

ALSO @ DBKP: Impeach Obama: An Idea Whose Time has Come

ALSO @ DBKP: Obama: A (IM)Peach of a Bumper Sticker

MORE: Impeach Obama Campaign

-

by RidesAPaleHorse images: RAPH

http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2011/02/impeach-obama-now-seen-aroundtown-and-elsewhere/
================================================================================== ==================================================================================

Morning Bell: The Obama Experts vs. the Rule of Law-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On October 4, 2010: How Obama Thinks-Posted on Forbes.com-By Dinesh D’Souza-On September 9, 2010: http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0927/politics-socialism-capitalismprivate-enterprises-obama-business-problem.html Newt Gingrich Calls Obama a Con Man-Posted on CBSNews.com-By Dan Farber-On September 12, 2010: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20016164-503544.html Obama’s NASA Pick Inks Space Deal with Saudis-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On October 4, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2334&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=12ac2c0b94EO_10_04_201010_4_2010&utm_medium=email Video of the Day: The Ugly Truth About Obama, Amnesty, and the SEIUPosted on ExposeObama.com-On September 23, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/09/23/video-of-the-day-the-uglytruth-about-obama-amnesty-and-the-seiu/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=a4941f62feEO_09_23_20109_23_2010&utm_medium=email FACT CHECK: White House health savings challenged-Posted on The Seattle Times-By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR-On September 13, 2010:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2012885073_a pushealthcostsfactcheck.html?syndication=rss The 15 Most Obvious Lies in President Obama’s Ohio Speech and 1 Damning Freudian Slip-Posted on Fmota News-On September 9, 2010: http://news.fmota.com/tag/freudian Govt to Investigate Obama’s Big Labor Bailout-Posted on Floyd ReportsBy Ben Johnson-On September 15, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2144&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=cc8077a572EO_09_15_20109_15_2010&utm_medium=email Is Obama a Tool of Wall Street and Unions?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 16, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2140&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=5ffa565a6fEO_09_16_20109_16_2010&utm_medium=email Soros’ latest gambit-Posted on American Thinker-By Ed Lasky-On September 11, 2010: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/09/soros_latest_gambit.html White House Seeks Confirmation of Judicial Nominees as Priority for Lame Duck Congress-Posted on CNSNews.com-By Fred Lucas-On October 01, 2010: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/76102

GOP Senate needed to block bad judges: ‘Obama resubmits five dangerous court nominees’-Posted on The Washington Times-On September 15, 2010: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/15/gop-senate-neededto-block-bad-judges/ Obama Recess Appointees Too Radical to be Confirmed by DemocratControlled Senate-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Floyd Brown-On September 30, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2289&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=48db68a5c3EO_09_30_20109_30_2010&utm_medium=email Supremely Slanted: ‘How the New York Times Pounds Conservatives and Coddles Liberals When Nominated for the Supreme Court’-Special Report published by Media Research Center-October 2010: http://mrc.org/specialreports/2010/SupremelySlanted/ExecSum.aspx An Avalanche of Obama Investigations Announced-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 28, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2264&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=04b912a303EO_09_28_20109_28_2010&utm_medium=email SEIU Fallout: FBI Investigates Prominent Labor Leader Andy SternPosted on The Blaze-By Jonathon M. Seidl-On September 28, 2010: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fbi-investigates-prominent-laborleader-andy-stern/

Key Dem: GOP to shut down government to probe eligibility: ‘Congressman warns Republican will investigate Obama’s birthplace’Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On September 27, 2010: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=208593 Hawaii Dems button-lipped on Obama eligibility status: ‘Doc missing statement candidate ‘qualified’ under U.S. Constitution’-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On September 25, 2010: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=207197 Video of the Day: Hawaii Democrats Refused to Certify Obama’s Eligibility-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On September 27, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/09/27/video-of-the-day-hawaiidemocrats-refused-to-certify-obamas-eligibility/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=8f8c012e0bEO_09_27_20109_27_2010&utm_medium=email More evidence emerges of rampant voter fraud in 2008-Posted on The Examiner-By Robert Moon-On September 25, 2010: http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/more-evidenceemerges-of-rampant-voter-fraud-2008?cid=examiner-email The Midterm Elections and the Communist Manifesto-Posted on Canada Free Press-By Joan Swirsky-On September 13, 2010: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/27604 Accelerating The March Toward One World Governance-Posted on Personal Liberty Digest-By Bob Livingston-On September 27, 2010:

http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/freedomconcerns/accelerating-the-march-toward-one-world-governance/? eiid=&rmid=2010_09_27_PLA&rrid=238497563 Administration’s inaction criminal and impeachable-Posted on Laigle’s Forum-By Don Hank-On September 25, 2010: http://laiglesforum.com/administrations-inaction-criminal-andimpeachable/1821.htm Obama Invokes ‘State Secrets’ Claim To Dismiss Lawsuit Against Targeting Of U.S. Citizen-Posted The Huffington Post-By PETE YOSTOn September 25, 2010: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/25/obama-statesecrets_n_739114.html Democrats, Not Colbert, Make a Mockery of the Border-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 24, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2233&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=03094e4fe4EO_09_24_20109_24_2010&utm_medium=email Video: Obama Ally Works w/Socialists for Global Tax-Posted on ExposeObama.com-On September 24, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/09/24/video-obama-ally-workswsocialists-for-global-tax/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=03094e4fe4EO_09_24_20109_24_2010&utm_medium=email Feds Plan to Control All Schools with Regulations-Posted on One News Now-By Bill Armstrong and Hank Brown-On September 29, 2010:

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Perspectives/Default.aspx?id=1188794 Obama: D.C. schools don’t suit daughters-Posted on The Washington Times-By Deborah Simmons, The Washington Times-On September 27, 2010: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/27/obama-dc-schoolsdont-suit-daughters/ A Film made by a Liberal that Liberals will try to Destroy-Posted on Big Hollywood-By John Nolte-On September 28, 2010: http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/09/28/waiting-forsuperman-review-a-masterpiece-of-moral-clarity/ Morning Bell: Education Reform’s Kryptonite-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 28, 2010: http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/28/morning-bell-education-reformskryptonite/? utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Mornin g%2BBell Academic Freedom: Obama Edition-Posted on Townhall-By Cal ThomasOn September 23, 2010: http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2010/09/23/academic_freedo m_obama_edition/page/full/ Morning Bell: Constitution Day and the Perilous Future-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 17, 2010: http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/17/morning-bell-constitution-day-andthe-perilous-future/?

utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Mornin g%2BBell The New Congress Will Consider Impeachment-Posted on Floyd ReportsBy Floyd Brown-On September 17, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2163&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=0f0e8fe6e9EO_09_17_20109_17_2010&utm_medium=email ‘It’s time to impeach Obama for high crimes against U.S.’: President blasted as a Christianity-hating tyrant ‘working that anvil right now forging our chains’-Posted on WND.com-By Joe Kovacs-On September 16, 2010: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204149 Arizona’s unheralded anti-quota initiative highlights Obama’s inconsistent stance on profiling and preferential policies-Posted on The Daily Caller-By Kevin Mooney , The Daily Caller-On September 16, 2010: http://dailycaller.com/2010/09/16/arizona’s-unheralded-anti-quotainitiative-highlights-obama’s-inconsistent-stance-on-profiling-andpreferential-policies/print/ Federal Zoning, Anyone? How About the Nationalization of Our Energy Industry Without Congressional Approval?-Posted on The National Center for Public Policy Research-On September 9, 2010: http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-Oceans_090910.html 50 Mind Blowing Facts About America That Our Founding Fathers Never Would Have Believed-Posted on Economic Collapse-On September 8, 2010:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/50-mind-blowing-factsabout-america-that-our-founding-fathers-never-would-have-believed Obama’s Secret Link to Hamas-Posted on Human Events-By Buzz Patterson-On September 8, 2010: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38893 Morning Bell: Neglecting Allies and Appeasing Foes-Posted on The Heritage Foundation-On September 8, 2010: http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/08/morning-bell-neglecting-allies-andappeasing-foes/? utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Mornin g%2BBell Obama’s Next Chief of Staff Tied to Radical Muslim Group-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 8, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2052&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=0ea1782d25EO_09_08_20109_8_2010&utm_medium=email The Mess Bush Left And Other Obama Fables-Posted on Investors.comBY THOMAS SOWELL-On September 7, 2010: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx? id=546236&p=2 Memo to Obama: Why They Talk About You “Like a Dog”-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September 7, 2010:

http://floydreports.com/? p=2033&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=abc3bd0c70EO_09_07_20109_7_2010&utm_medium=email Obama, Labrador Deceiver or Open-Border Collie?-Posted on PJTV-On September 9, 2010: http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=105&load=4123 Video of the Day: Impeach Obama for Broken Promises from Day OnePosted on ExposeObama.com-On September 7, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/09/07/video-of-the-day-impeachobama-for-broken-promises-from-day-one/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=abc3bd0c70EO_09_07_20109_7_2010&utm_medium=email 8 questions with ‘Conduct Unbecoming’ author Buzz Patterson-Posted on The Daily Caller-On September 5, 2010: http://dailycaller.com/2010/09/05/8-questions-with-conduct-unbecomingauthor-buzz-patterson/ Inspector general wants hearing with fair judge: ‘Case suggests retaliation for queries over money deals by Obama’s buddy’-Posted on WND.com-By Brian Fitzpatrick-On September 5, 2010: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=199061 FEC allows SEIU’s illegal political fund-raising scheme-Posted on Washington Examiner-By: Mark Mix, OpEd Contributor-On September 3, 2010:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEdContributor/Mark-Mix-FEC-allows-SEIUs-illegal-political-fund-raisingscheme-102140294.html Big Labor’s legacy of violence-Posted on Michelle Malkin-By Michelle Malkin-On September 3, 2010: http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/03/big-labors-legacy-of-violence/ Obama’s Next Vote Fraud Drive?-Posted on Floyd Reports-On September 3, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2017&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=fa1abcf077EO_09_03_20109_3_2010&utm_medium=email Obama is sneaking “Reparations” by us to buy Black votes with our money-Posted on The Coach is Right-By Kevin “Coach” Collins-On September 2, 2010: http://www.coachisright.com/obama-is-sneaking-“reparations”-by-usto-buy-black-votes-with-our-money/# Former Car Czar Rattner Rats on Obama-Posted on FoxNews.com-By Chris Stirewalt-On September 02, 2010: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/09/02/former-car-czar-rattnerrats-obama How Barack Obama Became Mr. Unpopular-Posted on Time.com- By MICHAEL SCHERER-On September 02, 2010: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2015629-1,00.html

Video of the Day: Impeach Obama Rally in San Diego-Posted on ImpeachObamaCampaign.com-On September 2, 2010: http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/impeach-obama-rally-in-sandiego/?utm_source=Floyd+Reports&utm_campaign=5a11e5c71bFR_09_02_20109_2_2010&utm_medium=email Congressman: Is Kenyan Constitution Con a Criminal Offense?-Posted on Floyd Reports-By Ben Johnson-On September, 2, 2010: http://floydreports.com/? p=2000&utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=16ce3a85ccEO_09_02_20109_2_2010&utm_medium=email Morning Bell: The Obama Doctrine-Posted on The Heritage FoundationOn September 1, 2010: http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/01/morning-bell-the-obama-doctrine/? utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Mornin g%2BBell U.S. Helps Radical Muslim Groups Get Taxpayer Dollars-Posted on Judicial Watch-On August 31, 2010: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/aug/u-s-helps-radical-muslimgroups-get-taxpayer-dollars GOP Will Investigate Obama Crimes After Midterms-Posted on ExposeObama.com-By Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports-On August 27, 2010: http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/08/27/gop-will-investigate-obamacrimes-after-midterms/? utm_source=Expose+Obama&utm_campaign=4dbe865773EO_08_27_20108_27_2010&utm_medium=email

Documented: Grounds for impeachment ‘This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless … ‘-Posted on WND.com-By Bob Unruh-On August 23, 2010: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=194785 Texans Reject Socialism: A Report From the Front Lines-Posted on The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property-By John Ritchie-On August 18, 2010: http://www.tfp.org/current-campaigns/2010/texans-reject-socialism-areport-from-the-front-lines.html Scandal: Obama, Gore, Goldman, Joyce Foundation CCX partners to fleece USA-Posted on Examiner-By Gregory Dail-On April 27, 2010: http://www.examiner.com/orange-county-conservative-inorlando/scandal-obama-gore-goldman-joyce-foundation-ccx-partnersto-fleece-usa Ernest Huber for Congress (WA-8)-Posted on YouTube.com-By FF1050On April 13, 2010: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnYLuNlgfFs Note: These recent articles and/or blog posts relate to and/or support my recent blog posts-You Decide: Obama’s paltry paper trail raises serious questions! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/obamas-paltry-paper-trailraises-serious-questions/ Congress report concedes Obama eligibility unvetted!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/congress-report-concedesobama-eligibility-unvetted/ Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/06/who’s-behind-the-financialcrisis/ Who or what caused the economic crisis that propelled President Obama into office? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/who-or-what-caused-theeconomic-crisis-that-propelled-president-obama-into-office/ Was there a conspiracy to put Obama in the White House? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/03/03/was-there-a-conspiracy-toput-obama-in-the-white-house-2/ Active complaint to the FEC over President Obama’s campaign finances! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/active-complaint-to-the-fecover-president-obama’s-campaign-finances/ FEC allows SEIU’s illegal political fund-raising scheme! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/04/fec-allows-seius-illegalpolitical-fund-raising-scheme/ JAGs Protecting President Obama Have Committed Treason! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/25/jags-protecting-presidentobama-have-committed-treason/ The Congressional Assault on Criminal Justice!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/05/the-congressional-assaulton-u-s-criminal-justice/ The Racial Mess! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-racial-mess/ President and DOJ have contributed to the racial mess in our country! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/26/president-and-doj-havecontributed-to-the-racial-mess-in-our-country/ Is Shariah Law A Danger To Our U.S. National Security? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/is-shariah-law-a-danger-tou-s-national-security/ Middle Eastern illegals find easy entrance into U.S. from Mexico! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/middle-eastern-illegals-findeasy-entrance-into-u-s-from-mexico/ Is U.S. Negotiating with the Taliban? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/is-u-s-negotiating-with-thetaliban/ Could the oil spill be an Act of War? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/could-the-oil-spill-be-an-actof-war/ What is the true intent of the UN Small Arms Treaty?

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/what-is-the-true-intent-ofthe-un-small-arms-treaty/ FCC reclassifying the Internet as a telephone system! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/fcc-reclassifying-theinternet-as-a-telephone-system/ Have the “power elite” and “pseudo-experts” covertly sold us corruption disguised as freedom? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/have-the-“power-elite”-andpseudo-experts-covertly-sold-us-corruption-disguised-as-freedom/ Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/19/nearly-80-percent-don’ttrust-the-government/ Have Americans Stopped Having Confidence In Their Government? http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/have-americans-stoppedhaving-confidence-in-their-government/ America’s Love Affair With President Obama Is Over! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/americas-love-affair-withpresident-obama-is-over/ Is It Time to Impeach the Stonewalling Obama! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/is-it-time-to-impeach-thestonewalling-obama/ Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!

http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/is-it-time-to-call-forobamas-resignation/ Restoring Honor In America! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/restoring-honor-in-america/ How ABC, CBS and NBC Have Dismissed and Disparaged the Tea Party Movement! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/how-abc-cbs-and-nbc-havedismissed-and-disparaged-the-tea-party-movement/ Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/obamanites-get-violent-insupport-of-the-agenda/ Positive Political Change In The Air For 2010! http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/positive-political-change-inthe-air-for-2010/ A Nation Adrift Theme and Disclaimer: http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/disclaimer/ ‘Food For Thought” “God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe” Semper Fi! ====================================================== ====================================================== ======================================================

Go to this group and join up to support this effort for IMPEACHMENT of Obama:
Impeach Obama Tea Party – FaceBook webpage Organize your own “Impeach Obama Tea Party.” Downloadable images for posters Protests are currently scheduled for the cities below. Click on the city name to go to FaceBook for further details.

Impeach Obama Tea Parties, currently scheduled.
April 15, 2011 (Tax Day) Atlanta, Georgia April 15, 2011 (Tax Day) Dallas, Texas April 15, 2011 (Tax Day) Houston, Texas April 15, 2011 (Tax Day) Phoenix, Arizona April 15, 2011 (Tax Day) San Diego, California http://stopobamanowsd.wordpress.com/impeach/

==================================================================================

E-Mail to my Congresswomen about Impeach Obama Protest
August 22, 2010 Roger 2 comments

This is an email that I sent to Congresswoman Davis with copies to Senators Feinstein and Boxer about the upcoming protest. Dear Senator Feinstein / Senator Boxer / Congresswoman Davis, A protest has been scheduled in your district in San Diego for Saturday, August 28th to call for the impeachment of President Barack Obama. We would like to know, if you will support impeachment and also to invite you to the protest to discuss this issue with hundreds of your constituents, who are calling for his removal. Here is a website with details of the protest. Impeach Obama Tea Party The reason that I am calling for impeachment is that I do not believe that he is a loyal American citizen from his many questionable actions in office and due to the racist sect, of which he was a member in Chicago, that has a religious belief that the black race will destroy America and white society. It is an outrage and a shame that any president should have been in such a racist organization, without the public being informed and without him repudiating it. We believe that he must resign or be removed from office as soon as possible. Sincerely, Roger Ogden Organizer Here is her response, below. Note that she does not rule out impeaching Obama, only says that it would be too expensive and time-consuming! Maybe they are getting sick of him, also!

August 31, 2010 Mr. Roger Ogden San Diego, CA Dear Mr. Ogden, Thank you for writing with your thoughts about impeaching President Obama. I appreciate hearing from you and apologize for the delay in my response. Each week, I receive over 2,000 pieces of mail, and it often takes me longer to respond than I would like. I don’t support your effort to impeach President Obama. An impeachment process is a costly and time consuming process. It would not be good for our nation, which is struggling to improve its economy. In fact, I think it would make matters worse. I would like see our nation attempt to come together and find common ground to solve our nation’s problems. Once again, thank you for contacting me. As your representative, I both need and value your perspective. Please sign up for my E-Newsletter at my website www.house.gov/susandavis, if you would like to receive regular updates about what is happening in Congress. With warm regards, SUSAN A. DAVIS Member of Congress

================================================================================ ==