Silence and Wives in Much Ado

Published on January 2017 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 42 | Comments: 0 | Views: 373
of 15
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

"Hush'd on Purpose to Grace Harmony": Wives and Silence in "Much Ado about Nothing"
Author(s): Michael D. Friedman
Source: Theatre Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3, Women and/in Drama (Oct., 1990), pp. 350-363
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3208080 .
Accessed: 28/06/2011 14:49
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Theatre Journal.

http://www.jstor.org

"Hush'd on Purpose to Grace Harmony":
Wives and Silence in
Much Ado About Nothing
Michael D. Friedman
In Act II, scene 3 of Much Ado AboutNothing, Claudio describes to his liege Don
Pedro the twilight's quiet mood as they prepare to hear the singer Balthasar:"How
still the evening is, as hush'd on purpose to grace harmony!" (II. iii. 38-39).1 Claudio
means, of course, that the stillness of the evening is the perfect setting for the
melodious sounds which are to follow, for the ideal listener blesses the musician
with silent attendance. But the harmony represented by music in Much Ado is a
marital, as much as a musical, concord. When Benedick calls for pipers to strike up
a dance at the end of the play, the harmony produced is, as A. R. Humphreys has
noted, the "symbol of happy marriage" (218n), a union which I will contend would
seem all the more agreeable to the men of Messina if their female partners (particularly
Beatrice, "she who blesses") remained "hushed on purpose" to grace the harmony
of the relationship.
One can easily imagine the reticent Hero fulfilling this subdued role in her marriage
to Claudio, but the talkative, aggressive Beatrice seems, at first glance, to be temperamentally unsuited to such submission. Most studies of Much Ado therefore assume that Beatricewill remain indomitable in marriage, finally achieving a truce with
Benedick without relinquishing her self-determination.2 However, feminist critics
recently have begun to point out that in Shakespeare's plays, female power, such
as that wielded by Beatrice, often paradoxically serves "to consolidate the status quo

MichaelD. Friedman,who has also writtenon Boswelland The Beggar's Opera, recentlyreceived
his Ph.D. from Boston University.He is currentlyan Assistant Professorat St. John's University
in Collegeville,Minnesota.

'All quotationsfromMuchAdoreferto the Arden Editionby A. R. Humphreys(London:Methuen,
1981).The particularpassage examined here has been treatedfully by JamesJ. Wey in " 'To Grace
Harmony':MusicalDesign in MuchAdoAboutNothing,"BostonUniversityStudiesin English4 (1960):
181-88, but ultimatelywith a very differentinterpretation.
2R.A. Foakes, the Penguin editor, has written, "In the end they agree together, in terms of an
honourable draw as one individual with another; the terms are their own, not those of society,
which commonly requires the subjection of women to parents and husbands" (MuchAdo About
Nothing[Harmondsworth:Penguin Books, 1968],13). This stancewas echoed by GarethLloydEvans

350

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

/

351

of male hierarchy./3 For example, the power displayed by Shakespeare's comic heroines is almost routinely surrendered to their husbands when they marry, for, as
Lynda E. Boose has observed, female roles are "invariablyqualified by Shakespeare's
overriding conviction that social harmony requires male control."4Indeed, the restoration of patriarchal forces at the end of Much Ado coincides with the culmination
of a gradual process of muting which Beatrice undergoes on her way to becoming
a married woman. I will argue that Beatrice, far from preserving her autonomy,
ultimately sacrifices the verbal mastery which constitutes her power in exchange for
a hushed existence as Benedick's wife.
The contradiction between the eloquence of Beatrice's original subversive position
and the play's representation of the eventual stopping of her mouth creates a tension
which is seldom communicated effectively in performance. In fact, almost all major
stage productions of Much Ado have endeavored to romanticize the reconciliation of
the witty lovers and to suggest that any problematic aspects of the conclusion reside
in the isolation of Don Pedro, not in the taming of Beatrice by Benedick. Pamela
Mason's examination of post-World War II revivals of Much Ado at Stratford-uponAvon revealed that the most common staging of the play's final moments spotlights
Benedick and Beatrice dancing alone, slowly deserted by the rest of the company,
while the unmarried Prince looks on forlornly from a distance.5 The 1982 RSC production directed by Terry Hands followed this pattern and ended the sequence with
a fadeout on the dancing pair miming an animated discussion ending in a kiss.6 Such
a conclusion leaves the viewer with the impression that Beatrice and Benedick will
live out their married lives embroiled in one long, highly-entertaining battle of wits
interrupted only periodically by affectionate truces. As emotionally appealing to
modern audiences as this projected outcome is, however, the theatrical signs which
convey this notion are wholly the product of Hands's directorial elaboration of the
brief stage direction "Dance" at the end of the play.
The relative terseness of stage directions in Shakespearean texts gives a director
considerable leeway to refashion the plays in light of contemporary social and political
concerns. This procedure results in what Kathleen McLuskie calls "constructed meaning," or "the social meaning of a play [which] depends upon the arrangements of
theatrical meaning." Scholarly treatment of this aspect of drama
III:1599-1604[Edinburgh:Oliverand Boyd, 1971]),who claimedthat Beatrice"displays
(Shakespeare
no wilting femininity, no suggestion of subservience either to men's whims and foibles or to any
conventions of society that women should know their place" (19).
3LyndaE. Boose, "The Family in ShakespeareanStudies; or-Studies in the Family of Shakespeareans;or-The Politicsof Politics,"Renaissance
Quarterly40 (1987):721.
4Boosehas paraphrasedthe gist of Peter Erickson'sPatriarchal
Structuresin Shakespeare's
Drama
(Berkeley:University of CaliforniaPress, 1985).
5PamelaMason, 'MuchAdo'at Stratford-upon-Avon,
1949-76,M. A. thesis (Universityof Birmingham,
England, 1976), 47, 87, 96-97. Mason has recorded such an emphasis at the close of productions
directed by Douglas Seale (Stratford-upon-Avon,1958), FrancoZeffirelli(National Theatre, 1965),
and TrevorNunn (Stratford-upon-Avon,1968). Peter Robertsnoted a similarconcluding focus in
TerryHands's 1982 Stratford-upon-Avonrevival ("MuchAdo AboutNothing,"Plays and Players30
[June1983]:34).
7 May 1982, 509.
6EmrysJones, "In Two Dimensions," TimesLiterarySupplement,

352

/

Michael D. Friedman

foregrounds the theatrical devices by which an audience's perception of the action of the
play is defined. The focus of critical attention, in other words, shifts from judging the
action to analysing the process by which the action presents itself to be judged.7
Such an approach necessarily emphasizes the range of choices available to a director
for staging a particular sequence and the effect any individual selection has on the
constructed meaning of the text.
This shift in the object of scholarly attention is clearly exemplified in Harry Berger's
recent reformulation of the text-versus-performance controversy epitomized by his
critical dialogue with Richard Levin.8 While Levin has maintained that any interpretation of a Shakespeare play that "cannot be conveyed on the stage could not have
been intended by the author and so must be rejected,"9 Berger has countered that
the meaning gleaned from central interpretive operations, such as the comparison
of widely remote speeches, "cannot be adequately conveyed or picked up" in the
theater; thus, performance provides an insufficient representation of the full import
of the text and should not constitute a test of critical validity.10 Although Berger has
professed that the psychological limitations of theater audiences need not regulate
the complexity of textual readings, in his latest work he redefines his approach to
the text as a "literary model of stage-centered reading," which "proceeds by a process
of correction toward performance, or at least toward performability, taking account
of theatrical circumstances but ignoring the constraints imposed by actual playgoing."1l In this movement "toward performability" in textual analysis Berger reconsiders the assumption, which he once shared with Levin, that certain readings are
by their nature unstageable. As Berger now claims,
Stage-centered critics often seem to underestimate the good actor's ability to work up
and/or stage complex interpretations, and they often ignore the influence of particular
styles or traditions of acting on what counts as an actable interpretation.12
In response to Berger's revised position, I offer the notion of a reading's performability
as a topic in itself worthy of critical inquiry. Given a textual interpretation, the critic

7KathleenMcLuskie, "The patriarchalbard: feminist criticismand Shakespeare:King Learand
ed. JonathanDollimore
Newessaysin culturalmaterialism,
MeasureforMeasure,"in PoliticalShakespeare:
and Alan Sinfield (Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress, 1985),95.
on StageandPage(Berkeley:Universityof California
Audition:Shakespeare
8HarryBerger,Imaginary
Press, 1989).One may chartthe progressionof Berger'streatmentof this issue in his earlierworks
by consulting, among others, "TextAgainst Performancein Shakespeare:The Exampleof Macbeth,"
Genre15 (1982):49-79; "Sneak'sNoise: Rumorand Detextualizationin 2 HenryIV," KenyonReview
N.S. 6 (Fall1984):58-78; and "Psychoanalyzingthe ShakespeareText:The FirstThreeScenes of the
and the Questionof Theory,ed. PatriciaParkerand GeoffreyHartman(New
Henriad,"in Shakespeare
York:Methuen, 1985), 210-29. Levin's position is amply illustratedin New Readingsvs. Old Plays:
Drama(Chicago:Universityof ChicagoPress,
RecentTrendsin theReinterpretation
of EnglishRenaissance
1979);"TheNew Refutationof Shakespeare,"ModernPhilology83 (1985):123-41;and "PerformanceCriticsvs. Close Readersin the Study of English RenaissanceDrama,"ModernLanguageReview81
(1986):545-59.
547.
9RichardLevin, "Performance-Critics,"
?HarryBerger,"TextAgainst Performance,"51-52.
"HarryBerger,ImaginaryAudition,140.
2Ibid.,13.

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

I

353

profitably may investigate the historical and theatrical conditions, as well as the
performance choices, that might contribute to (or detract from) the expression of
such a reading.'3 As an illustration of this approach, I detail in the rest of this essay
a stageable alternative to the usual staging of the conclusion of Much Ado based on
textual evidence that suggests Beatrice renounces her scathing verbal wit as she
approaches marriage.
In the opening scene Beatrice demonstrates the strength of her sharp tongue by
emerging victorious in her first "skirmish of wit" with Benedick (I. i. 57-58). The
vanquished soldier retreats from this initial encounter only to attack again later from
behind the shield of his disguise at Leonato's masque. In an attempt to shame Beatrice
into curbing her banter, Benedick rumors that a certain gentleman has accused her
of deriving her disdainful wit from the HundredMerry Tales, a collection of vulgar
comic stories. This slander backfires, however, for Beatrice recognizes Benedick and
launches a devastating barrage of wit against him. As he later describes the onslaught
to Don Pedro, "I stood like a man at a mark, with a whole army shooting at me.
She speaks poniards, and every word stabs" (II. i. 230-232). Here, as elsewhere in
the play, wit is metaphorically depicted as a piercing weapon. Most often it is a
dagger or sword, as when Benedick answers Claudio's request that he display his
wit with, "It is in my scabbard, shall I draw it?" (V. i. 125). Through its association
with penetrating blades, wit is specified as a uniquely masculine weapon which
Beatrice has no business brandishing. As Carol Cook has pointed out, Hero's comment on Margaret'sverbal thrusts at Beatrice- "There thou prick'st her with a thistle"
(III.iv. 71)-suggests that wit retains its phallic, masculine character("prick'st")even
when appropriated by women.14 Benedick later echoes this notion when he "claims
swordlike phallic wit as a masculine prerogative that women wield only through
usurpation":
Benedick:And so I praythee call Beatrice;I give thee the bucklers.
Margaret:Give us the swords, we have bucklersof our own.
Benedick:If you use them, Margaret,you must put in the pikes with a vice, and they
are dangerousweapons for maids.

[V. ii. 16-21]15

Nevertheless, for the first half of the play, the "vocal Beatrice refuses the subjection
of femininity . . . by placing herself among the men and wielding phallic wit as
aggressively as they."'6
Leonato warns Beatrice that this constant raillery will deter all prospective suitors:
"By my troth, niece, thou wilt never get thee a husband, if thou be so shrewd of
"In order to place myself in a position to make claims about MuchAdo from this perspective, I
directeda productionof the play at BostonUniversityand collectedresponses fromaudiencemembers
in a questionnairedesigned to gauge their reactionto aspects of my interpretation.All conclusions
concerningthe effects of various stagings are based on the results of this experiment.
"4Carol
Cook, " 'The Sign and Semblanceof Her Honor':ReadingGender Differencein MuchAdo
AboutNothing,"PMLA101 (1986):190.
"SIbid.,190.
16Ibid.

354

/

Michael D. Friedman

thy tongue" (II. i. 16-17). Even her future mate Benedick "cannot endure" her when
she plays "my Lady Tongue" and tears his masculine ego to shreds (II. i. 257-258).
His perfect woman, as he paints out her qualities in the long soliloquy before his
gulling scene, is not only "Rich,""wise," virtuous," and "fair,"as Beatrice clearly is,
but also "mild," which she undoubtedly is not (II. iii. 30-33). Benedick can appreciate
female speech in a pleasant and innocuous form, as his additional requirement that
his paragon be "of good discourse" indicates (II. iii. 33), but he cannot abide the
acute, unrestrained voice of an assertive woman. Margaret Loftus Ranald remarked
with some surprise that Benedick's hypothetical quintessence of womanhood resembles Hero more closely than Beatrice,17but this anomaly is easy enough to explain:
both Benedick and Claudio would prefer a spouse who understands her subservient
position and knows how to modulate her voice in the presence of her husband.
Although Hero by habit speaks kindly to men and only when spoken to, Beatrice
must be slowly trained to moderate her speech before she can become a congenial
wife.
Beatrice's resistance to marriage is based in part on her knowledge of the unequal
balance of power between the genders which prevails within it:
Leonato: Well, niece, I hope to see you one day fitted with a husband.
Beatrice: Not till God make men of some other metal than earth. Would it not grieve a
woman to be overmastered with a piece of valiant dust, to make an account of
her life to a clod of wayward marl?
[II. i. 53-58]

This remark is often taken as evidence of what Carol Thomas Neely has called
Beatrice's "apprehensiveness about the sexual and social submission demanded of
women in marriage,"l8but Beatrice does not question that wedlock, if she chooses
it, requiressuch subservience. She laments that there are no men of superior substance,
by whom she could be "overmastered" without considering it an insult and to whom
she could "make an account of her life" without being debased. The sharp irony of
Beatrice's comments on matrimony reveals that she harbors a genuine longing for
the type of inclusion in society which marriage allows, coupled with resentment that
a wedding ring is a prerequisite for such inclusion.19 For example, when Hero and
Claudio are first betrothed, Beatrice cries, "Good Lord, for alliance! Thus goes everyone to the world but I, and I am sunburnt. I may sit in a corner and cry 'Heigh-ho
for a husband!' " (II. i. 299-301). Speaking this passage, an actress may utilize the
self-deprecating humor of this lament to expose Beatrice's fear that her habitual

andLiterary
andHis SocialContext:Essaysin OsmoticKnowledge
LoftusRanald,Shakespeare
1'Margaret
(New York:AMS Press, 1987), 14.
Interpretation
18CarolThomas Neely, "BrokenNuptials in Shakespeare'sComedies," in Shakespeare's
"Rough
Essaysin Honorof C. L. Barber,ed. Peter Ericksonand Coppelia Kahn (Newark:
Magic":Renaissance
Universityof DelawarePress, 1985),67.
"gFormarriageas "the sine quanon of social acceptance"in Messina, see RichardA. Levin, Love
and Societyin Shakespearean
Comedy:A Studyof DramaticFormand Content(Newark:University of
DelawarePress, 1985), 26.

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

/

355

disdain of men may someday condemn her to lonely spinsterhood. As Neely has
suggested, "Beatrice'saggressive, witty resistance to men and marriage... poignantly
reveals her desire for both."20
Don Pedro's plot to make Beatriceand Benedick fall in love with each other resolves
the conflict in Beatrice's mind between her desire for marriage and her anxiety over
the subjection it involves. Jean Howard has demonstrated that the Prince's conspiracy
not only brings to the surface the witty combatants' concealed mutual affection but
also completes "their successful interpolation into particular positions within a gendered social order."21Whereas the male conspirators, speaking to be overheard by
Benedick, dwell on Beatrice'slovesick torment in an effort to persuade him to become
her master and protector,
the conversationstaged for Beatriceonly brieflyfocuses on Benedick'ssuffering.He is
presentedas the good manany womanwouldbe a fool to scorn,but mostof his attention
focuses on how unnaturalher pride, her wit, and her independenceare.22
Hero, a bit censorious of her cousin's easy volubility in mixed company, opens the
gulling scene by asking Margaret to draw Beatrice away from her conversation with
the Prince and Claudio to eavesdrop in the orchard. There Beatrice hears herself
faulted for the excessively critical view she takes of her male suitors and the verbal
license with which she mocks them:
Disdainand scornride sparklingin her eyes,
Misprisingwhat they look on, and her wit
Valuesitself so highly that to her
All matterelse seems weak.
[II. i. 514]

Ursula adds that Beatrice's wit must be "without true judgement" (III. i. 88) because
she so often turns it against the rare Signior Benedick, preferring the sport of derision
to the appropriate appreciation of his excellences. Once Hero and Ursula convince
Beatrice that "Signior Benedick, I For shape, for bearing, argument, and valour, /
Goes foremost in report through Italy" (III. i. 95-97), she seems more than willing
to abandon her pride and scorn and acknowledge him as the man of superior substance by whom she will allow herself to be overmastered: "And, Benedick, love on,
I will requite thee, / Taming my wild heart to thy loving hand" (III. i. 111-112).
Here Beatrice characterizes herself as a domesticated bird,23in Hero's phrase, a
"haggard of the rock" (III. i. 36), a female hawk broken to her captor's will after
having reached maturity in the wild. This epithet clarifies the difference between the
two types of subdued spouse favored by Benedick and Claudio, respectively. Just

20Carol
ThomasNeely,"Broken
Nuptials,"67.
and the politicsof genderand rankin MuchAdo
Howard,"Renaissance
21Jean
antitheatricality

AboutNothing,"in Shakespeare
ed. JeanE. Howard and MarionF. O'Connor(New York:
Reproduced,
Methuen, 1987), 178.

and the politicsof gender,"178.
'2JeanHoward,"Renaissance
antitheatricality

23Ibid.

356

/

MichaelD. Friedman

as some falconers prefer the contained fierceness of the haggard, in spite of the
difficulty of training it, to the relative docility of a nestling raised in captivity, some
men would rather marry a woman like Beatrice, whose independence makes her
harder to subdue but who is more spirited within the bonds of wedlock than a
domesticated maid like Hero. Benedick's predilection for the more belligerent of the
two women aligns him with a group of Shakespearean comic heroes, including
Petruchio and Theseus, who battle, conquer, and eventually marryrebellious females.
Such men take pleasure in the combative nature of this courtship; as the Duke of
Athens proudly reminds his bride, "I wooed thee with my sword, / And won thy
love doing thee injuries" (MidsummerNight's DreamI. i. 16-17).24Similarly, Benedick
may at one point celebrate the contentious quality of his lovemaking with Beatrice"Thou and I are too wise to woo peaceably" (V. ii. 67)-and yet later feel a selfsatisfaction akin to Petruchio's at the thought that his now obedient wife has allowed
him to tame her.
Beatrice'sconfession of her readiness to yield to Benedick's "loving hand" provides
the rationale for a shift in the tone of her later comic exchanges with him. After the
gulling scenes, Beatrice appears to forsake the piercing wit she used in their earlier
caustic skirmishes and move toward a playful, less pointed style of delivery:
Benedick:Sweet Beatrice,wouldst thou come when I calledthee?
Beatrice: Yea, signior,and departwhen you bid me.
Benedick:O, stay but till then!
Beatrice: 'Then'is spoken;fareyou well now.

[V. ii. 41-45]

At this point in the play, Beatricehas not said a word since her violent call for revenge
against Claudio and her equally vehement condemnation of Benedick's reluctance
to undertake it. Following Benedick's resolution to make the challenge which secures
their engagement, Beatrice speaks no more "poniards" to stab and wound her lover;
instead, she adopts a teasing, deferential attitude formerly reserved for Leonato and
the Prince. Although Beatrice might appear to converse mildly in this exchange, as
Benedick wishes, her affected courtesy merely masks her subversive but literally
obedient manipulation of her future husband's language. Such subversion is one of
the few forms of verbal power left open to the woman who forgoes wielding pointed
wit.
Upon Beatrice's retirement from the fray, as Ray L. Heffner, Jr. has observed, the
role of Messina's female fencer passes to Margaret, who "steps into [Beatrice's]shoes
as witty commentator" on the follies of lovers.25The transfer of this office occurs on
the morning of the wedding, when Hero's gentlewoman baits Beatrice for her unconvincing attempt to pass off her lovesickness as a head cold:

PelicanShakespeare,
generaled.
24Quotationsfrom plays other than MuchAdorefer to TheComplete
Alfred Harbage(New York:Viking Press, 1969).
ed. WalterEdens et
Shakespeare,
25RayL. Heffner, "Cluesin MuchAdoAboutNothing,"in Teaching
al. (Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress, 1977),210.

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

/

357

Beatrice: I am stuffed, cousin, I cannotsmell.
Margaret:A maid, and stuffed!There'sgoodly catchingof cold.
Beatrice: O, God help me, God help me, how long have you professedapprehension?
Margaret:Eversince you left it. Doth not my wit becomeme rarely?
[III.iv. 59-65]
Now that Beatrice has abandoned her barbed humor, Margaret takes it up and turns
it against her, employing a jest very similar to the one Beatrice breaks upon Benedick
in Act 1, when she refers to him as "no less than a stuffed man" (I. i. 53).26 Margaret

also flaunts the quickness of her newfound wit near the end of Act III, scene iv by
launching a long, breathless burst of wordplay against Beatrice, who asks, "What
pace is this that thy tongue keeps?" "Not a false gallop," answers Margaret (III. iv.
87-88). This riding metaphor recalls Benedick's ironic admiration of the swiftness of
Beatrice's wit during their first hostile encounter: "I would my horse had the speed
of your tongue, and so good a continuer" (I. i. 130-131).
Benedick reenacts his initial duel of wits with Beatrice later in the play against a
new opponent when he and Margaret square off in the opening segment of Act V
scene ii:

Benedick:Thy wit is quickas the greyhound'smouth, it catches.
Margaret:And yours as blunt as the fencer'sfoils, which hit, but hurt not.
Benedick:A most manly wit, Margaret,it will not hurt a woman.
[V. ii. 11-16]
John Wain claimed that "this scene is entirely without function except in so far as
Benedick asks her to go and fetch Beatrice and she agrees to do so,"27but in this
assertion he failed to perceive that when Margaretassumes the role of quick-tongued
adversary she becomes "an explicit surrogate for Beatrice" in the exercise of penetrating wit.28 This substitution serves its ultimate purpose in the final scene, when
Leonato takes Margaret to task for her participation in the plot to defame Hero.
Whether she knew of the conspiracy or not, Margaret is still guilty of exceeding the
boundaries of acceptable female intercourse by speaking with Borachio at night at
Hero's chamber window. Interestingly enough, the woman who is charged with one
kind of speech infraction has also committed another; like Beatrice, she has appropriated masculine wit to puncture the pride of men. Beatrice is never overtly faulted
for this offense, but her surrogate undergoes a public chastisement for violating the
proprieties of feminine discourse. Margaret silently and quickly fades from view,
and the verbally transgressive woman as a type is effectually chastened.
Even though the "shrewishness" has already been purged from Beatrice's discourse, she must undergo a final verbal subjugation before she can become the ideal

26Brian
Prose(London:Methuen, 1968), 191.
Vickers, TheArtistryof Shakespeare's
27JohnWain, "TheShakespeareanlie-detector:Thoughtson 'MuchAdo About Nothing,' " Critical
Quarterly9 (1967):37-38.
28RayL. Heffner, "Clues in MuchAdo,"210.

358

/

MichaelD. Friedman

nuptial partner for the protagonist. Benedick subdues her once and for all when their
love sonnets to each other are produced, thereby "proving" their reciprocal attachment:
Benedick:A miracle!Here'sour own hands againstour hearts.Come, I will have thee,
but by this light I takethee for pity.
Beatrice: I would not deny you, but by this good day I yield upon greatpersuasion,
and partlyto save your life, for I was told you were in a consumption.
Benedick:Peace!I will stop your mouth.
[V. iv. 91-97]
The staging of this climactic moment raises an interpretive issue with implications
for the significance of the sequence in performance. Both editors and directors commonly call for Benedick to kiss Beatrice after speaking the final line of the passage,
but Edward Berry has drawn attention to a textual crux that allows an alternative to
the traditional blocking of the exchange. Pointing out that both the Quarto and Folio
assign the speech, "Peace, I will stop your mouth," to Leonato, not Benedick, Berry
asserted that Leonato should step in and initiate the kiss that brings the two lovers
together, just as another third party, Beatrice, gives directions for Hero and Claudio's
kiss at their betrothal: "Speak, cousin, or, if you cannot, stop his mouth with a kiss
and let not him speak neither" (II. i. 292-293).29Berry also argued that since Beatrice
has already finished speaking, the "mouth" referred to must be Benedick's, but the
fact that Beatrice has completed a sentence does not exclude the possibility that she
is about to begin a new one when her uncle interrupts her and gestures for Benedick
to silence her with a kiss. Leonato's intervention endows Benedick with the patriarchal
power to manage his wife's tongue, and the act of accepting this control makes him
into a husband. Immediately, Don Pedro asks, "How dost thou, 'Benedick, the
married man'?" (IV. ii. 98).30
After Benedick kisses her, Beatrice does not speak another word for the remaining
twenty-nine lines of the play. The way viewers interpret this silence, if they notice
it at all, will depend largely upon the director's staging of the kiss itself and its
aftermath. If the lovers melt into a mutual embrace and later, as in Hands's production,
they mime a dialogue, spectators will be unlikely to see any major significance in
Beatrice's short period of stillness. Such a staging relies, however, on a textual
interpretation that privileges the sharp tongue Beatrice wields throughout the first
four acts of the play over the muted voice with which she speaks in the fifth. Boose
noted the prevalence of such a critical preference when she wrote,
Whenfeministcritiqueslookedat the marriagestructuresevokedat the end of comedy,
for instance,they tended to focus on the subversivelyliberatingactionsthat had led up
to the conclusionratherthan on the hierarchicalsubordinationand the silencingof the

ComicRites(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress, 1984), 185.
29EdwardBerry,Shakespeare's

marriedcouple,[Benedick]
3'ElliotKriegerhas written,"Nowthatthey areto be a respectably
andtheSocialOrderin 'MuchAdoAbout
Relations
mouthwitha kiss"("Social
... 'stops'Beatrice's

Survey32 [1979]:59).
Nothing,' " Shakespeare

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

/

359

comicheroinethat often accompanythe reimpositionof institutionsat the end of those
same comedies.31
An alternative reading might be that Shakespeare clearly gave Beatrice an expressive
and compelling voice with which to object to the subservience of the female sex but
that in so doing he set up a formidable "straw-woman" whose mouth he stopped
in the final scene. When Beatrice, who once advised Hero to contradict even her
father's wishes in the choice of a husband, yields willingly to male control, this
surrender indicates that masculine domination is "natural," "correct,"and "necessary" after all. As Lisa Jardine stated, "Misrule is set to rights by astute sleight-ofhand. Beatrice charmingly capitulates."32
What Jardine called "sleight-of-hand" is the method through which the potentially
disturbing aspects of Beatrice's surrender coincide with and are therefore masked
by the happiness the audience feels at her reconciliation with Benedick. Conversely,
Kate's long speech at the end of The Tamingof the Shrewplaces the issue of wifely
subservience squarely at the center of attention and forces a director to enter into
the ideological conflict over the duties of wives in marriage. The conclusion of Much
Ado, however, lacks an overt enunciation of this question and only partakes in this
discourse if a modern director recognizes the symbolic possibilities of requisite stage
actions, such as the kissing of Beatrice, and chooses to use them to foreground the
controversy over verbal license in married women. Such a staging would highlight
one of the most immediately relevant aspects of the comedy for contemporary spectators.
The Quarto and Folio provide the basis for one such approach to the question of
wives and silence in the performance of Much Ado through the possibilities they
present for the treatment of Leonato's spouse. According to both texts, two figures
in the play's first entrance are "Leonato Governorof Messina"and "Innogen his wife"
(I. i. s.d.). The phrase "his wife" then recurs in the list of entering characters for Act
II, scene i, but in neither of these scenes, nor anywhere else in the play, does Innogen
speak. The first editor to omit her entirely from the play, Theobald, in 1733, gave
the following rationalization:
I have venturedto expunge[thisname];therebeingno mentionof her throughthe play,
no one speechaddressedto her, nor one syllablespokento her. Neitheris thereany one
passage,fromwhich we have any reasonto determinethat Hero'smotherwas living. It
seems as if the poet had in his firstplan designed such a character;which, on a survey
of it, he found would be superfluous,and thereforehe left it out.33
Succeeding editors generally have followed Theobald's reasoning in deleting Innogen
from the cast of characters, but the claim that there is "no mention of her through
the play" is inaccurate, for there is a reference to her in the play's first scene:
3Lynda E. Boose, "The Familyin ShakespeareStudies," 719-20.
3LisaJardine,StillHarpingon Daughters:WomenandDramain theAgeof Shakespeare
(Totowa:Barnes
& Noble, 1983), 113.
33Quotedin MuchAdo AboutNothing,New VariorumEdition, ed. Horace Howard Furness, 5th
ed. (1899;New York:Dover Publications,1964), 7.

360

/

MichaelD. Friedman

Don Pedro: [Looking at Hero] I think this is your daughter.
Leonato:
Her mother hath many times told me so.
Benedick: Were you in doubt, sir, that you asked her?
Leonato:
Signior Benedick, no, for then you were a child.
Don Pedro: You have it full, Benedick; we may guess by this what you are, being a man.
Truly the lady fathers herself.
[I. i. 95-102]

Don Pedro's comment that Hero "fathers herself" compliments both Leonato and
his wife, for, as Claire McEachern has noted, "Hero's physical resemblance to her
father guarantees her mother's fidelity, and with it, her father's honor."34Innogen
appears as the embodiment of wifely chastity, a quality made all the more apparent
by Benedick's comically failed attempt to raise humor in the questioning of it.
This passage also provides a rejoinder to another argument often put forward by
scholars in favor of omitting Innogen. Furness, the editor of the Variorum Edition,
asked, "But how was the audience to know that she was 'the mother of Hero' or

her aunt, or her grandmother, if she neither spoke one word herself nor a single
remark was made to her by others?"35 This question assumes that the meaning of

the play is transmitted to an audience wholly in verbal terms, but it is quite easy
onstage to indicate a figure's relationship to other characters by visual means alone.
For example, as Leonato speaks the line, "Her mother hath many times told me so,"
he may turn toward Innogen and smile at her. If she then meets his eyes, smiles,
and nods in agreement, the audience will have no trouble identifying her as the
mother of Hero, despite the fact that the line is not directed to her.
The final justification for the deletion of Innogen stems from the assumption that
she was originally conceived as a speaking character, but that, in the words of the
New Cambridge editor, "Shakespeare found no use for her as the play developed
with his writing. A mother might have mitigated the pathos of the rejected Hero in
4.1, and must surely have had something to say in her daughter's defence."36In its
pursuit of Shakespeare's original intent, this line of reasoning fails to consider the
possibility that a modern directormay utilize Innogen as a perpetually mute character,
silent even at a time when any "normal" mother, as seen from a twentieth-century

perspective, would certainly have voiced strong objections.37If Innogen does hold
her tongue and conspiciously supports Leonato when he turns against his daughter

4ClaireMcEachem,"FatheringHerself:A SourceStudy of Shakespeare'sFeminism,"Shakespeare
Quarterly39 (1988):277.
35Fumess,MuchAdo, 7.
3MuchAdoAboutNothing,ed. F. H. Mares,New CambridgeShakespeare(Cambridge:Cambridge
UniversityPress, 1988), 148. This argumentdates back to AlexanderDyce, who wrote (FewNotes,
etc. [London, 1853], 37), "One thing I hold for certain. . . that, if [Innogen]ever did figure among
the dramatispersonae,it was not as a mere dummy; there are scenes in which the mother of Hero
musthave spoken;-she could not have stood on the stage without a word to say about the disgrace
of her daughter. .. . [quotedin Variorum,
7].
37Afterconceivingthe idea of includingInnogen in our productionfor the purpose of representing
the ideal silent wife, I ranacrossElliottKrieger'svery similarsuggestion. In an aside to his discussion
of the characterswho remain quiet about the plot to recuperateHero, he added, "Ursula'ssilence

WIVES AND SILENCE IN MUCH ADO

/

361

in the church scene, she will then have shown herself to possess all the characteristics
of the virtuous Elizabethan wife: chastity, obedience, and silence.38
Brought up by such a mother, it would not be surprising that Hero also should
defer obediently to men in all aspects of conversation. In fact, Hero is unable to
refute convincingly Claudio's impeachment of her virginity in the church scene
precisely because she allows the Count to limit her verbal power to defend herself.
He first calls upon Leonato, by "that fatherly and kindly power" that he has over
his daughter (IV. i. 74), to enjoin Hero to answer truthfully a question that Claudio
will put to her. Hero submits to this paternal command, but she cannot exonerate
herself through the circumscribed speech that Claudio's inquiry reduces her to employing, since any answer will prove her guilt:
Claudio:

Whatman was he talk'dwith you yesternight,
Out at your window betwixttwelve and one?
Now if you are a maid, answerto this.
I talkedwith no man at that hour, my lord.
Hero:
Don Pedro:Why, then are you no maiden.

[IV. i. 83-87]

In order to prove her maidenhood, Hero must name the man with whom she allegedly
spoke, but to do so would in itself constitute an admission of immorality. Moreover,
when she denies having conversed with any man at all, the Prince seizes this "falsehood" as evidence that Hero is "no maiden."
Don Pedro's connection of "untruthfulness" to unchastity suggests an association
between women's verbal license and sexual promiscuity. As Peter Stallybrass has
pointed out, the writers of Renaissance conduct books for women commonly equated
"the closed mouth" with "the enclosed body" and condemned the open mouth as
a sign of wantonness.39 For example, R. Toste wrote in a marginal gloss to his
translation of Benedetto Varchi's The Blazon of Jealousie:

Maidesmust be seene, not heard, or selde or never,
O may I such one wed, If I wed ever.
A Maidethat hath a lewd Tonguein her head,
Worsethan if she were found with a Manin bed.40

is not easilyexplained.Maybesilenceis a virtueencouraged
of womenin thissupposedlyfeminine

world, as it is in Lear?If that is so, maybe productionswould benefit from having a mute character
cast as 'Innogen-Wife to Leonato'as listed in the opening scene directionof the Folio text" (57n).
38LisaJardine,Still Harping,104. These same qualities have been identified by Suzanne W. Hull
as the three most highly regarded female virtues in Renaissanceliteraturefor women. See Chaste,
Silent,andObedient:
EnglishBooksfor Women1475-1640(San Marino:HuntingtonLibrary,1982),142.
39PeterStallybrass,"PatriarchalTerritories:The Body Enclosed,"in Rewritingthe Renaissance,
ed.
MargaretW. Fergusonet. al. (Chicago:University of ChicagoPress, 1986), 127.
40BenedettoVarchi,TheBlazonof Jealousie,trans. R. Toste (London, 1615), 28, cited in Stallybrass
along with the following passage from FrancescoBarbaro'streatise On WifelyDuties(trans. B. G.
Kohl, in The EarthlyRepublic:ItalianHumanistson Government
and Society,ed. B. G. Kohl et al.,
[Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978], 205): "It is proper . . . that not only arms
but indeed also the speech of women never be made public;for the speech of a noble woman can
be no less dangerous than the nakedness of her limbs" (126-27).

362

/

Michael D. Friedman

In Much Ado, the actual crime which Don Pedro claims that he, his brother, and
Claudio witnessed Hero commit was that she did "Talkwith a ruffian at her chamberwindow" (IV. i. 91), the same offense for which Margaret is later publicly chastised.
As for Beatrice, her freedom of discourse can be condoned, even enjoyed, while she
is single; as the Prince tells her, "Yoursilence most offends me, and to be merry best
becomes you" (II. i. 312). But Don Pedro may take pleasure in Beatrice's "merry"
wit only because he has never felt its sting. Benedick, who has, takes care to stop
her mouth at the moment of her marriage, and her speech conforms to the guidelines
of wifely modesty for the short duration of the play.
Innogen typifies the woman on the other side of the matrimonial altar from Hero
and Beatrice: the chaste, obedient, verbally deferential wife, which both young
women become once harmony has been fully established. In order to communicate
this idea more forcefully in performance, the focal point of the closing moments of
MuchAdocan be shifted away from the traditional spotlight on Beatriceand Benedick
or slow fade on Don Pedro alone and unmarried to a focus on the situation of the
wives of Messina, including Innogen. Her presence at the marriage of her daughter
in Act V, scene iv can make a significant contribution to an emphasis on the enforced
subservience of wives in the play's final scene.4'
After Benedick silences Beatrice, he calls for a dance, the stage action which represents the wedded state. This dance may be choreographed so that the men and
women are divided into two parallel lines, with the partners facing each other across
a short distance. This arrangement not only pairs off the couples about to be married
but also preserves the bonds among the males and the females, which the play
suggests are as important, if not more important, than the ties across sexual lines
which the characters are preparing to celebrate. The dance concluded, all of the men
and single women may rush to congratulate Benedick and Claudio, leading them
offstage to the chapel with much commotion. On the opposite side of the platform,
Innogen may come forward to embrace both Hero and Beatrice, and the three of
them may keep the stage, watching silently as their husbands make their exit. Through
this staging, a director may exploit the power of tableau to associate Beatrice and
Hero with the play's paragon of wifely virtues and thus to imply their own acceptance
of the subservient role she represents.
Although the majority of spectators may interpret this staging in a similar manner,
there may be less agreement in their emotional reactions to it. While some viewers
may find nothing objectionable in the idea that Beatrice will become Benedick's

41Within the last century, at least three professional productions of MuchAdo have revived the
wife of Leonatoin some form, but I have been unable to find any accountof the effect her inclusion
might have had on the play. A review in the New YorkHerald(9 February1903)recordsa production
at the ElizabethanTheaterin Mrs. Osbor's Playhouse that included a "Mrs.Grant"as "Imogen."
Six years earlier,Augustin Daly also "found some sort of use" for Innogen in his revival (New York
Times27 December 1896);unfortunately, contemporaryaccounts do not preserve exactly what it
was (see also BostonGlobe4 May 1897). Most recently, William Hutt of the Stratford,Ontario
ShakespeareFestivalfound room for a "ContessaLeonato"in the cast of his 1971 effort (New York
Times9 June 1971:52), but none of the reviews I have read comment on her presence.

WIVESAND SILENCEIN MUCHADO

/

363

submissive wife, others may be disturbed by this suggestion and complain about
being deprived of the unproblematic happy ending they may feel is essential to
comedy. This second reaction is precisely the effect a production that seeks to examine
the question of wives and silence might strive to provoke. Granted that Beatrice and
Benedick seem perfectly matched and destined for an affectionate marriage, in order
to achieve it, Beatrice suppresses, at least temporarily, the indomitable spirit and
verbal mastery which modern audiences have found her most attractive and distinctive attributes. This suppression, if clearly expressed, introduces a sense of loss
which can balance in performance the audience's pleasure in witnessing her joyous
union with Benedick. If spectators find an equal emphasis on Beatrice's capitulation
to the male hierarchy troubling, the alienation produced by this unexpected focus
can give them the detachment to perceive that such submission is not necessarily
"correct"and "natural"after all.42
Modern directorswho object to the subordination and silencing of the comic heroine
at the end of a Shakespearean play may deal with this circumstance in either of two
ways. On the one hand, they may cut criticalpassages and use elements of stagecraft
to contradict whatever evidence of the heroine's subjugation occurs in the dialogue.
This strategy effectively avoids the theatrical reproduction of the sexist values underlying her enforced submission, but it also sacrifices an awareness of the social
forces which prescribe her ultimate surrender. The other option, which is to foreground and problematize the notion of wifely subservience, both reveals the ideological conditions which constrain the behavior of female characters and draws upon
the dramatic tension these limitations create. Admittedly, such an approach may not
elicit the emotional satisfaction which traditional conclusions to comedies like Much
Ado have routinely produced, but it does offer the pleasure of a fuller understanding
of the play's internal ideological conflict.

42SeeElin Diamond, "BrechtianTheory/FeministTheory:Towarda GesticFeministCriticism,"The
DramaReview32 (1988):84-85.

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close