Star Lawyer Increase July 262008
Content
Change to a legitimate legal system consistent with the Constitution is always possible if we do not mind paying the members of the Law Society what ever they want to go legal As I have stated many times the legal system provided by the unscrupulous members of the Law Society is illegal consistently inconsistent with democracy and the Constitution absolutely not conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. Such a tangled web of deceit that it simply costs far too much for the average person to access leaving them vulnerable to the criminal element who thrive off them and invariably expand into the big time where the criminal lawyers feast to the humongous detriment to society. Chaos is left in their wake until they are finally brought to court where justice is not obtainable administered by members of the Law Society who are first and foremost in it for the money which sucks society dry creating the symptoms they thrive off where the modus operandi of the legal system is specially designed for the luxurious benefit of the members of the Law Society predictable to assure victims necessary for their success while having the nerve to charge the public protection money for something they never intended to provide. Who will protect us from them? They are all set up with their bibs on waiting to address the symptoms of deliberately not putting a system in place capable of protecting the people as guaranteed by the Charter. The people may be fooled but the criminal element is not, quite aware of what they can get away with especially since the people find it cheaper and less aggravating to let the criminals go writing off their losses rather than going after them throwing away more money in the inane court system. It works for the criminals and the criminal lawyers and the taxpayers continue to pay for nothing but a belief that they are being protected. All the woes with the legal system are obviously due the fact the members of the Law Society are not required to give a damn about the people’s rights so they obviously do not. Every individual is guaranteed equal protection and benefit and the only way that can be achieved is through taxation. The only reason the legal system is so costly is due their deliberate incompetence to structure a simple legitimate system in “The Spirit” of the Constitution consistent with the Golden Rule. Now they want a raise for the pathetic excuse they call a legal system. The taxpayer has a material stake in the whole damn system.
Lawyer pay significantly decreased urged. Its absurd they get paid at all for the illegitimate legal system they operate in designed to ransack society.
The number one problem is dealing with the people who need legal aid. The countries wealth is not fairly distributed creating the illegitimate two tier system in the first place with minimum wages far too low to the ultimate benefit of wealthy who do not pay their fair share of taxes having the advantage of write offs and safe havens, which the hard working people cannot access simply because they haven’t the money to invest. The rich are encouraged to invest more getting richer just by doing it in the money they save from not paying their fair share of taxes, which ultimately puts the burden on the middle class over and over again. When people live under the poverty line or even above their housing and whatever needs to be subsidized by the taxpayer who is already taxed too much trying to pay their way and the wealthy too which is simply absurd. It is absolutely ridiculous that the people with the most money already comfortable have the laws designed for their benefit where the government must be impartial uninfluenced by the affluent and influential. Every individual must be influential in matters of law where every individual is guaranteed equality consistent with democracy.
Make the system legitimate and efficient like it should be and make it free through taxes which is the only legitimate way and cut lawyers wages because it will not be as challenging to do it right and the ultimate benefit will be justice.
Can that be true? The problem addressed is the same one I have been addressing for three years and I consider this admittance even though the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name provided him and his refusal to respond was admittance enough. The unscrupulous members of the Law Society as demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document have to be nothing else when the Attorney General (member of the Law Society) who advises all Ontario Government departments and agencies would not sign on to giving the middle class access to the system. Obviously if the low income people are provided free lawyers the middleclass are paying the greatest support for them and yet they cannot afford lawyers themselves. The system as it stands not only makes them less equal to the wealthy who have humongous advantage over them but the lower wage earners who have already burdened them through no fault of their own also have the advantage of a free lawyer where in either case it is futile to venture into court against either of them if they care to go against the odds of getting justice in the first place with the present justice system.
Why is he even discussing improving access to the system when we are guaranteed it by the Charter with no mention of money. We taxpayers pay for an efficient legal system and they design an efficient system for their benefit and say too bad if you cannot afford to pay. There illegitimate attitude cannot stop and will not stop. We must stop them..
This suggests the poor are getting the least cunning lawyers and above all $73 - $92 is absurd for so many reasons published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and obviously the government who has no qualms with the poverty level and the starving would have some nerve to even suggest they are any where near worth $73-$92 to rip the people off when they could be ripped off for much less if there was no law at all. It is absolutely absurd that we pay the government to protect us from people precisely like them. Like any business, more money please, it is a natural phenomenon inherent to every individual. The problem is it is all one sided where the people of the Lower Tiers most assuredly need more money have nobody on their side. The consequences is the governments who are supposed to be on their side are only concerned about their own side and having the advantage they take what they want and the people of the Lower Tier who desperately need the raise end up in getting a decrease as their taxes continue to go up, increasing taxes throughout all of society with consumer products over inflated with taxes causing more and more of the middle class to slide closer to the poverty line and they all ready there in hopelessness and despair end up in the bottom of the criminal element working their way up to the top leaving chaos in their wake and more and more need public housing and aid hitting the middle class more all conducive to self destruction with the minority high and dry, the lawyers plenty of work due the incompetence of the system which they want hich bucks for their services. Step back, get out of town before we run you out. There is a place for insanity but not in the legal system that must be consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights with competent responsible, irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction prerequisite. This not addressed to lawyers who obviously are devoid of common sense and “The Spirit” of the law, which is evident in everything they do for they simply can not help it any more than your average venomous snake spider or scorpion. At least they do not go looking for people to bite or create snake pits for people to fall in and in fact they are conducive to society.
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: July 27, 2008 2:04 AM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: July 26 2008 Toronto Star Joe Hall and Tracey Tyler
Legal aid urged for middle class
Re: Ontario report recommends lowering barriers that restrict access to justice
Please see attachment and web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs As you people know I have been providing you irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy for at least a couple of years now and this topic is just one of the many charges I have made but instead of exposing them to stand up for the people to get the necessary changes made quickly and to put a stop to the corruption you write this to help them sneak it past the public as if it was okay for them to have let this happen and when they get past this they will just carry on organized crime as usual and better off for it as usual. This is their modus operandi glossing over their conspiracy while coming out smelling like roses and of course they could not do it with out your cooperation. I have written about how they blocked a Public Inquiry when the Standing Committee on Public Accounts looking into the RCMP pension fund scandal was linked to the DOJ. Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day announces it would cost the taxpayer too much for a Public Inquiry when they could deal with the matter internally obviously meaning they can cover it up if they do not let it get out to the people and you people just go along with it. When the Task Force Report came out in late December, purposely in the festive season to let it slide that there was no mention of the DOJ in the report you people let it slide. I mean you cannot possibly be that dumb to not know what is going on and it certainly would have been a good story and it would have been a nice Christmas present for the people to get the truth instead of a manipulation. You should know that it is the Attorney General who advises all the government department and agencies including the Ombudsman and of course is involved with assigning their mandate with very limited authority according to the correspondence in the Ombudsman document on my web site but they publish on the Ombudsman web site that they are the group to end all government corruption. They claim they are independent of the government yet the Attorney General obviously advises them accounting for the ridiculous responses I received from them. There was the same consistency from all government departments that responded and they surely cannot all be that dumb, but if they are there is a serious story there. There is a story that goes to the DOJ who refuses to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights even though the federal government made the guarantee.
There is a story of how the entire Ontario Government refuses to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and that is obviously because the Attorney General advises them all but it does not explain why the Attorney General does not back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. Of course we know why, because they never intended to back the guarantee and it is all just a scam right from the very first line of the Charter. “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law” The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” defines that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established legal principle but hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole. He is responsible to be the guardian of the rule of law and the guardian of the public interest. The rule of law was obviously incompetent to protect the public interest prior to the 1982 enactment and most certainly is incompetent to protect the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. When one asks why was it incompetent prior to the Charter we can see there is only one logical reason to scam the people because they obviously weren’t interested in amending the rule of law to make it competent and as guardian of the rule of law it appears he is not permitted to change it but fend off anyone who would attempt to do so. When you read the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document and see that they adamantly state or imply their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights it explains why they do not. When you read they do not look at the supporting evidence to my complaint against one of their members and yet take 2 months to find him incompliance with their standards you have to know that all they are there for is to quash complaints and protect their members. It is incomprehensible that their members hold every position in the government but it explains why the Ombudsman and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing never took the evidence into account when they made their ignorant decisions. Obviously to be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you need competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the endeavour but ultimately the Attorney General is responsible for the government departments and agencies as it states so in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” So obviously he is responsible for the inaccessible legal system, the topic at hand. That is what I stated along time ago and the fact is he is responsible for it being so expensive, simply because that is their intention to benefit the members of the Law Society and why the rule of law remains today to be that most elusive concept hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole and when you put it all together it explains why society has no many problems and for that the lawyers want a raise. There is a serious mental health issue here and I do not know if it is embedded in the system or he people for allowing it to happen. Of course the people do not know what is going on although they believe they do with the media making every effort to get the top stories out except of course the true story as we see from the Saturday column.
With all the evidence I provided the Attorney General about the legal system not being accessible to every individual all he has to say is they should try to make it less costly while they raise the lawyers pay. Typical M.O. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The only way you can logically meet the terms in 15. (1) is to provide justice free and pay for the system through taxes. The taxpayers may watch them a little better but they are cunning unscrupulous critters. To bring the costs down they have to restructure consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individuals guaranteed Charter rights and do a complete overhaul on the rule of law to make it efficient and effective closing all the loopholes that cost the taxpayer’s so much money. Meanwhile both the Chief Justice Warren Winkler and, Attorney General Chris Bentley have admitted that the system is too costly and inaccessible just as I charged and even then the Attorney General is not considering financing through taxation, which would eliminate the department presently deciding who gets aid and who does not. The point is not only is this true of what I allege on my web sites but everything is true and irrefutably proven and yet you stand idly by helping them to cover it up. The Federal Accountability Act, 2006 is just another cover up attempting to gloss over the deliberately irresponsible manner the Attorney General has advised the Government departments and agencies where he already had the authority and responsibility to ensure the government personnel were operating consistent with the Constitution so what in hell is the federal Accountabilty Act, 2006 going to do that the Constitution Act, 1982 does not….. the Ombudsman Act and so on. No matter if they enacted 5000 Acts and manned them with a million personnel nothing will change because the Attorney General is involved with them and he is not about to grant any of them authority to take him out and end the conspiracy. Well once again I inform you the evidence is on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites. Perhaps you really did not have a good look at it and perhaps you are in on the conspiracy. We shall see. Frank Gallagher Manager CDF
Lawyer pay significantly decreased urged. Its absurd they get paid at all for the illegitimate legal system they operate in designed to ransack society.
The number one problem is dealing with the people who need legal aid. The countries wealth is not fairly distributed creating the illegitimate two tier system in the first place with minimum wages far too low to the ultimate benefit of wealthy who do not pay their fair share of taxes having the advantage of write offs and safe havens, which the hard working people cannot access simply because they haven’t the money to invest. The rich are encouraged to invest more getting richer just by doing it in the money they save from not paying their fair share of taxes, which ultimately puts the burden on the middle class over and over again. When people live under the poverty line or even above their housing and whatever needs to be subsidized by the taxpayer who is already taxed too much trying to pay their way and the wealthy too which is simply absurd. It is absolutely ridiculous that the people with the most money already comfortable have the laws designed for their benefit where the government must be impartial uninfluenced by the affluent and influential. Every individual must be influential in matters of law where every individual is guaranteed equality consistent with democracy.
Make the system legitimate and efficient like it should be and make it free through taxes which is the only legitimate way and cut lawyers wages because it will not be as challenging to do it right and the ultimate benefit will be justice.
Can that be true? The problem addressed is the same one I have been addressing for three years and I consider this admittance even though the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name provided him and his refusal to respond was admittance enough. The unscrupulous members of the Law Society as demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document have to be nothing else when the Attorney General (member of the Law Society) who advises all Ontario Government departments and agencies would not sign on to giving the middle class access to the system. Obviously if the low income people are provided free lawyers the middleclass are paying the greatest support for them and yet they cannot afford lawyers themselves. The system as it stands not only makes them less equal to the wealthy who have humongous advantage over them but the lower wage earners who have already burdened them through no fault of their own also have the advantage of a free lawyer where in either case it is futile to venture into court against either of them if they care to go against the odds of getting justice in the first place with the present justice system.
Why is he even discussing improving access to the system when we are guaranteed it by the Charter with no mention of money. We taxpayers pay for an efficient legal system and they design an efficient system for their benefit and say too bad if you cannot afford to pay. There illegitimate attitude cannot stop and will not stop. We must stop them..
This suggests the poor are getting the least cunning lawyers and above all $73 - $92 is absurd for so many reasons published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and obviously the government who has no qualms with the poverty level and the starving would have some nerve to even suggest they are any where near worth $73-$92 to rip the people off when they could be ripped off for much less if there was no law at all. It is absolutely absurd that we pay the government to protect us from people precisely like them. Like any business, more money please, it is a natural phenomenon inherent to every individual. The problem is it is all one sided where the people of the Lower Tiers most assuredly need more money have nobody on their side. The consequences is the governments who are supposed to be on their side are only concerned about their own side and having the advantage they take what they want and the people of the Lower Tier who desperately need the raise end up in getting a decrease as their taxes continue to go up, increasing taxes throughout all of society with consumer products over inflated with taxes causing more and more of the middle class to slide closer to the poverty line and they all ready there in hopelessness and despair end up in the bottom of the criminal element working their way up to the top leaving chaos in their wake and more and more need public housing and aid hitting the middle class more all conducive to self destruction with the minority high and dry, the lawyers plenty of work due the incompetence of the system which they want hich bucks for their services. Step back, get out of town before we run you out. There is a place for insanity but not in the legal system that must be consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights with competent responsible, irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction prerequisite. This not addressed to lawyers who obviously are devoid of common sense and “The Spirit” of the law, which is evident in everything they do for they simply can not help it any more than your average venomous snake spider or scorpion. At least they do not go looking for people to bite or create snake pits for people to fall in and in fact they are conducive to society.
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: July 27, 2008 2:04 AM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: July 26 2008 Toronto Star Joe Hall and Tracey Tyler
Legal aid urged for middle class
Re: Ontario report recommends lowering barriers that restrict access to justice
Please see attachment and web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force-boomerangs As you people know I have been providing you irrefutable evidence of Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy for at least a couple of years now and this topic is just one of the many charges I have made but instead of exposing them to stand up for the people to get the necessary changes made quickly and to put a stop to the corruption you write this to help them sneak it past the public as if it was okay for them to have let this happen and when they get past this they will just carry on organized crime as usual and better off for it as usual. This is their modus operandi glossing over their conspiracy while coming out smelling like roses and of course they could not do it with out your cooperation. I have written about how they blocked a Public Inquiry when the Standing Committee on Public Accounts looking into the RCMP pension fund scandal was linked to the DOJ. Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day announces it would cost the taxpayer too much for a Public Inquiry when they could deal with the matter internally obviously meaning they can cover it up if they do not let it get out to the people and you people just go along with it. When the Task Force Report came out in late December, purposely in the festive season to let it slide that there was no mention of the DOJ in the report you people let it slide. I mean you cannot possibly be that dumb to not know what is going on and it certainly would have been a good story and it would have been a nice Christmas present for the people to get the truth instead of a manipulation. You should know that it is the Attorney General who advises all the government department and agencies including the Ombudsman and of course is involved with assigning their mandate with very limited authority according to the correspondence in the Ombudsman document on my web site but they publish on the Ombudsman web site that they are the group to end all government corruption. They claim they are independent of the government yet the Attorney General obviously advises them accounting for the ridiculous responses I received from them. There was the same consistency from all government departments that responded and they surely cannot all be that dumb, but if they are there is a serious story there. There is a story that goes to the DOJ who refuses to support the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights even though the federal government made the guarantee.
There is a story of how the entire Ontario Government refuses to back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and that is obviously because the Attorney General advises them all but it does not explain why the Attorney General does not back the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. Of course we know why, because they never intended to back the guarantee and it is all just a scam right from the very first line of the Charter. “Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law” The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” defines that most elusive concept-the rule of law- a well established legal principle but hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole. He is responsible to be the guardian of the rule of law and the guardian of the public interest. The rule of law was obviously incompetent to protect the public interest prior to the 1982 enactment and most certainly is incompetent to protect the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. When one asks why was it incompetent prior to the Charter we can see there is only one logical reason to scam the people because they obviously weren’t interested in amending the rule of law to make it competent and as guardian of the rule of law it appears he is not permitted to change it but fend off anyone who would attempt to do so. When you read the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document and see that they adamantly state or imply their members are not required to give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights it explains why they do not. When you read they do not look at the supporting evidence to my complaint against one of their members and yet take 2 months to find him incompliance with their standards you have to know that all they are there for is to quash complaints and protect their members. It is incomprehensible that their members hold every position in the government but it explains why the Ombudsman and the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing never took the evidence into account when they made their ignorant decisions. Obviously to be consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you need competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the endeavour but ultimately the Attorney General is responsible for the government departments and agencies as it states so in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” So obviously he is responsible for the inaccessible legal system, the topic at hand. That is what I stated along time ago and the fact is he is responsible for it being so expensive, simply because that is their intention to benefit the members of the Law Society and why the rule of law remains today to be that most elusive concept hard to easily define that protects the individual and society as a whole and when you put it all together it explains why society has no many problems and for that the lawyers want a raise. There is a serious mental health issue here and I do not know if it is embedded in the system or he people for allowing it to happen. Of course the people do not know what is going on although they believe they do with the media making every effort to get the top stories out except of course the true story as we see from the Saturday column.
With all the evidence I provided the Attorney General about the legal system not being accessible to every individual all he has to say is they should try to make it less costly while they raise the lawyers pay. Typical M.O. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The only way you can logically meet the terms in 15. (1) is to provide justice free and pay for the system through taxes. The taxpayers may watch them a little better but they are cunning unscrupulous critters. To bring the costs down they have to restructure consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individuals guaranteed Charter rights and do a complete overhaul on the rule of law to make it efficient and effective closing all the loopholes that cost the taxpayer’s so much money. Meanwhile both the Chief Justice Warren Winkler and, Attorney General Chris Bentley have admitted that the system is too costly and inaccessible just as I charged and even then the Attorney General is not considering financing through taxation, which would eliminate the department presently deciding who gets aid and who does not. The point is not only is this true of what I allege on my web sites but everything is true and irrefutably proven and yet you stand idly by helping them to cover it up. The Federal Accountability Act, 2006 is just another cover up attempting to gloss over the deliberately irresponsible manner the Attorney General has advised the Government departments and agencies where he already had the authority and responsibility to ensure the government personnel were operating consistent with the Constitution so what in hell is the federal Accountabilty Act, 2006 going to do that the Constitution Act, 1982 does not….. the Ombudsman Act and so on. No matter if they enacted 5000 Acts and manned them with a million personnel nothing will change because the Attorney General is involved with them and he is not about to grant any of them authority to take him out and end the conspiracy. Well once again I inform you the evidence is on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites. Perhaps you really did not have a good look at it and perhaps you are in on the conspiracy. We shall see. Frank Gallagher Manager CDF
