Systematic Risk Assessment of Highrisk Structures against Disproportionate Collapse Based on IStructE guidelines
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
Key Concepts and Eurocode Requirements
2. BACK GROUND AND DESIGN OBJECTIVES 7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
2
Risk-based approach for design (against disproportionate collapse)
• Not a substitute for the lack of structural form • Objectives – Identify Hazards – Eliminate the hazards – Develop risk-reduction measures
• Level of detail – Engineer to decide – Qualitative, Semi-quantitative & fully quantitative
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
3
Risk • Hazard: something which has the potential to cause harm – Action on the structure – “Soft” hazard [eg: failure to communicate effectively]
• Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
4
Risk-based design • “Acceptable level of risk” – unique for a structure • Good risk management – Costs of risk reduction ≈ magnitude of risk
• Secondary benefit – Indentifying and communicating risks
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
5
Reduction of risk As low as reasonably practicable
• Approach 1: – Reduce all risk to threshold
• Approach 2: – Reduce all risks so far as reasonably practicable(SFARP)
• Risks above threshold – unacceptable 7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
6
Building risk classification • • • •
Class 1 Class 2A – Lower Risk Group Class 2B – Upper Risk Group Class 3 – High Risk Group – “a systematic risk assessment of the building should be undertaken taking into account both foreseeable and unforeseeable hazards”
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
7
Framework for a systematic risk assessment
3. DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEMATIC RISK ASSESSMENT 7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
8
Framework • Single author – full responsibility – Suitable Qualification and Experience (SQEP) – Risk assessment workshop – HAZard and Operability study (HAZOP)
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 10 remaining risks
Likelihood scale Example Likelihood scale Likelihood Frequent/ common
Frequency
Approximate return period (based on 50 year design life)
10 times in design life
Less than 1 in 10 years
Likely
50% probability of occurrence during design life
1 in 10 years to 1 in 100 years
Unlikely
10% probability of occurrence during design life
1 in 100 years to 1 in 1000 years
Rare
2% probability of occurrence during design life
1 in 1000 years to 1 in 10000 years
Improbably
0.1% probability of occurrence during design life
1 in 10000 years to 1 in 100000 years
Negligible
Less than 0.1% probability of occurrence during design life
Greater than 1 in 100000 years
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
11
Consequence Scale
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
12
Risk Threshold
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
13
Parties involved in risk assessment • • • • • •
Client/building owner Structural engineer (designer) Other designers External stakeholders Building control authority CDM coordinator/ risk management specialist
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
14
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 15 remaining risks
(1) Identify the hazards
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
16
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 17 remaining risks
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 18 remaining risks
(2) Eliminate the hazards • Easier at the early stages of design
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
19
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 20 remaining risks
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 21 remaining risks
(3) Determine the tolerable risk threshold • Extent of collapse for any given likelihood • The threshold should be skewed towards consequence – This effect diminishes beyond a certain point
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
22
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 23 remaining risks
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 24 remaining risks
(4) Evaluate the risk • Risk = likelihood × consequence • Watch points – Sensitivity of solution/risk
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
25
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 26 remaining risks
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 27 remaining risks
(5) Identify risk reduction measures • Irrespective of level of risk • Reduction of a risk may increase another risk • Not limited technical – “Soft” (procedural)
7/18/2014
Harikrishnan Panikkaveettil
28
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil
3
Communicate 29 remaining risks
1
Review
2
7/18/2014
Identify the hazards Determine the tolerable risk level
Eliminate the hazards if possible
Risk = Likelihood × Consequence
4
Identify risk reduction measures
5
Benefit / Cost assessment
6
Implement risk reduction
7
Residual risk
8
Sensitivity of the risk assessment
9
ReviewHarikrishnan the overall level of risk Panikkaveettil