The definition of a whistleblower

Published on June 2016 | Categories: Types, Brochures | Downloads: 34 | Comments: 0 | Views: 200
of 11
Download PDF   Embed   Report

The paper provides a brief definition of the phenomenon and its key characteristics.

Comments

Content

Objectives

Action Options

‹

‹

In 1973, Bill Toomer was a quarantine officer at Fremantle,
Western Australia, he inspected a ship and ordered it
fumigated. This was an expensive operation, unwelcome by
some ship owners who had cosy relationships with their
regulators. Toomer came under fierce and sustained attack.
He lost his job, his family broke up and he ended up
destitute in bad health.
Regarding his case, there have been some 11 inquiries into
the affair over two decades, an expensive exercise for the
government and Toomer. Justice continues to be pursued
for Toomer, requesting that the federal government
formally exonerate him of the charges against him and
make a compensation payment, as has been recommended
more than once by government officials in the longlong-running
saga. But the government continues to stall and resist
action.

At the end of this session and with further
reading students should be able to.
Identify what a whistleblower is
‹
Identify possible reasons for and against blowing
‹
the whistle
Discuss the possible impacts on individual
‹
whistleblowers
Synthesise information pertaining to action
‹
Identify appropriate strategies to resolve the
‹
particular issue within an Australian context.
Recognise possible pitfalls that whistleblowers may
‹
face
Identify strategies to avoid common mistakes
‹
made by whistleblowers

Objectives
At the end of this session and with further
reading students should be able to.
Identify what a whistleblower is
‹
‹
Identify possible reasons for and against
blowing the whistle
Discuss the possible impacts on individual
‹
whistleblowers
Identify Australian protections for whistleblower
‹
‹

Synthesise information pertaining to
action

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/04Calland.h
tml

1

Terms
colloquial terms
– Dobbing,
– Tattletale
– Snitch
– informant

Alternative terminology
– Whistle blower
– Public interest disclosure
– Good faith reporting

Not - Good Faith
‹ reckless

disregard for or wilful
ignorance of facts that would
disprove the disclosure.
‹ instances when a false report is
made and the person knows the
report is malicious, false, or frivolous
‹ undertaken as part of a vindictive
agenda.

Whistleblower
‹

‹

A whistleblower is a person who discloses wrongdoing to
another person, whether within or outside the organisation
in which the wrong doing has occurred.
A concerned citizen, totally, or predominantly motivated by
notions of public interest, who initiates of her or his own
free will, an open disclosure about significant wrongdoing
directly perceived in a particular occupational role, to a
person or agency capable of investigating the complaint
and facilitating the correction of wrongdoing

Source: In the Public Interest August 1994 Commonwealth of Australia 1994

public interest reporting / Whistle
blowing
‹ financial,
‹ health
‹ and

safety reasons

2

Options
Ignore what has occurred
Try to redress the situation as an
individual
‹ Report
‹
‹

– Through organisations processes
– Through an independent third party
– Engage in legal processes
– Regulatory body
– Media
– Mandatory reporting

No action
‹ Do

unto others as you would have
them do unto you; treat your
colleagues the way you would want
to be treated."
‹ "I don't really know what happened."
‹ "A lawsuit won't bring back a dead
person, heal an injury or change a
situation"

Action
‹a

duty to be truthful to
clients/patients?
‹ compensation.
‹ duty to protect others

Type of person
‹
‹

Historically known for their honesty and integrity
Model employee









‹
‹

Conscientious
Highly valued employee
Educated
Experienced
Efficient
Hardworking
Honest
Have an overall perception of how organisation functioned

Believe in the institutions of the Westminster system
(parliament and bureaucratic)
Strong belief in the law and its associated procedures
(Public Interest August 1994 Commonwealth of Australia
1994)

3

Additional
‹ Commonly

see situations in terms of
black/white with very little grey
‹ Very private people –loners
‹ Inability to “shove something under
the rug”
‹ Tried other means unsuccessfully
‹ Anger drives their passion
Taylor (1999)

Differences between America &
Australia

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Environmental factors:

‹

“Courage charms us, because it indicates
that a man loves an idea better than all
things in the world, that he is thinking
neither of his bed, not his dinner, nor his
money, but will venture all to put in the
act the invisible thought of his mind”.

‹a

result of a decline in ethical
standards the
‹ An increase in self interest
‹ greater public awareness of
processes and benefits

(cited in, Ventriss & Barney, 2003, p. 355)

4

Patterns of effects on
whistleblowers
Risk loss of earnings
additional financial loss
‹ People experience;
‹
‹

– Intimidation
– Harassment
– Victimisation
– Personal abuse
– personal & professional reputation damage

‹
‹

protracted legal battles
damage to personal life (loss of spouse,
partner, family friends and health

Organisation’s responses
‹
‹

– trouble maker
– incompetent - having a reduced or serious defects in job
performance
– vindictive,
– having severe psychological problems
– low morals

‹
‹
‹
‹
‹

Strategies employed
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹
‹

Denial of adequate staff to perform duties;
Frequent staff changes;
Frequent and undesirable office changes;
Refusal to assign meaningful work / provide excessive work
Unwarranted and unsubstantiated letters of reprimand or
unsatisfactory performance evaluations;
Demotion;
Reduction in pay;
Denial of promotion;
Suspension;
Dismissal;
Denial of employment;
A supervisor or superior encouraging peer to behave in a hostile
manner toward the whistleblower; or
A change in the physical location of the employee's workplace or a
change in the basic nature of the employee's job,

exerting pressure
attacking the whistleblower for example by describing the
individual as,

marginalising the individual
trivialise the problem
placing the onus of proof on the whistleblower
employment sanctions ensue
threaten to bring a defamation case against the individual

Australian legislation
Whistleblowers Protection Act 1993 in
South Australia
‹ Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 in
Victoria
‹ Whistleblower Protection Act 1994 in
Queensland
‹ Public Interest Disclosure Act 1994 in the
ACT
‹ Protected Disclosures Act 1994 in NSW
‹ Official Corruption Commission Act 1988 in
Western Australia.
‹

5

Mandatory reporting
Appropriate disclosure mechanisms?

Reason non report
a lack of evidence;
lack of confidence in the authorities to
accurately evaluate or protect sexually
abused children;
‹ adverse effects on the family's social
standing in the community;
‹ potential to break up the family;
‹ fear of breaking counsellorcounsellor-client
confidentiality.
(Goldman & Padayachi,
Padayachi, 2002)
‹
‹

‹ Levels

states

& who reports varies between

Managers
“that managers need to create
organisational cultures in which employees
have faith in management as a whole and
will respond to reports of corruption — not
by shooting the messenger — but in a
positive manner. Encouraging an open and
accountable workplace is therefore not
just about complying with legislative
requirements, but about being an effective
manager.”
A report by Lala Camerer

6

Questions to be answered
‹

How do you blow the
whistle?

‹

‹

Are my family and I financially and mentally
ready for a longlong-drawndrawn-out fight to prove
the issue?
Am I mentally ready to have my colleagues
and perhaps my friends turn against me
because of the action that I will take?
Am I ready for personal attacks against my
character and to have my past indiscretions
made public?

Questions continued
Do I have adequate documentation to
prove my allegations if I have access to
the relevant information terminated?
‹ Am I sure that my motivations are to
expose the misconduct and not just sour
grapes, revenge, or public attention.
‹ Am I financially and mentally ready to
change my career to work outside my
current field?
‹

Proceeding?
‹ consider

the issue of mistakes and
successes
‹ tools to replicate successes and
avoid mistakes

7

Common mistakes
‹ trusting

too much
‹ not having enough evidence
‹ using the wrong style
‹ not waiting for the right opportunity
‹ not building support
‹ playing the opponent’s game
‹ not knowing when to stop
Brian Martin (1999)

Evidence
‹ sufficient
‹ evidence

Trusting too much
Based on a belief that the system
functions as it should
‹ an individual has a very strong sense of
right and wrong they expect all others to
be the same.
‹ Need for
‹

– proper investigation,
– preparation of an escape route,
– and weighing ones options
‹

There is more than one perspective on
how to do the right thing in a situation.

using the wrong style
‹ Reasoned

before making a claim

‹ accuracy

‹ Rational
‹ Unemotive

‹ evidence

rules
‹ time frames

8

not building support

not waiting for the right opportunity
‹ Patience

often = positive response

playing the opponent’s game
‹ Formal

channels

‹ Ensure

support prior to action

not knowing when to stop
‹ When

to cut losses

9

Points to remember
‹ Consider

these mistakes and plan
‹ Select issue
‹ The more serious the greater the
retribution

Where to Blow the Whistle cont
‹ External

mechanisms

– the media,
– Legislation based forums
‹ the

courts

‹ administrative

forums

Where to Blow the Whistle
‹ Internal

mechanisms Examples:

– anonymous reporting
– internal complaint mechanisms

Specific legislations
‹ Victorian

Equal Employment
Opportunity Act
‹ Commonwealth Disability
Discrimination Act
‹ Occupational Health and Safety Act
‹ Freedom of Information Act

10

Possible Government agency
outcomes
‹ intervene

in the matter
‹ conducting a regulatory hearing and
issuing fines or sanctions if
appropriate
‹ investigating the issues
‹ conducting corrective rulerule-making
proceedings

Media form considerations
‹ The

range and number of stories in
the newspaper is greater than on
television.
‹ More people watch television than
read the newspapers.
‹ An article will tell more of the story
than coverage on the news.
‹ The use of a picture can be worth a
thousand words.

Where to Blow the Whistle cont.
‹ Anonymous

? sources

– advocacy groups may provide protective
cover for whistleblowers by giving them
anonymity
– external or internal hotlines,
– ombudsmen's offices,
– internet

11

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close