of 2

Va Tech Taste Study Plumbing Contractor News

Published on December 2018 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 3 | Comments: 0



Plumbing Contractor News Your Source for Plumbing News

New University Study Proves Superiority o CPVC Relativ Relativee to Taste, Odor and Leaching Leachi ng Concerns Copper and Five Dierent Polymer Pipe Materials Tested to Compare Perormance Using Multiple Water Treatment Disinectants

Executive Summary

“Results indicate that copper pipe consumed nearly all the residual

Water quality – both rom a health and saety sta ndpoint, as well as a

disinectants… results or the polymer materia ls indicated that CPVC

taste and smell perspective – should be a primar y concern whether you’re you’re

imparted the ewest organic compounds to the water, consumed the least

installing hot and cold water d istribution piping into a consumer’s home

amount o disinectants, and produced no noticeable odors. All other

or a commercial ood or beverage processing plant. The boom in the

polymer materials imparted distinct odors and organic chemicals to

bottled water industry is proo that consumers are sensitive sensitive to noticeable

water and consumed residual disinect ant.”

tastes and odors in the water t hey drink, a nd they’re they’re willing to go to extra eorts and even pay more or more aesthetically-pleasing aesthetically-pleasing water.

The Virginia Tech study is not the rst to examine the sensory impacts rom polymer pipes interacting with drinking water oxidants. What

The Civil and Environmental Engineering Department o Virginia Tech

makes the study un ique, however, however, was that both chemical and consumer-

recently conducted a sensory impact study on various piping materials in

assessed sensory characteristics o water in contact with the materials

regard to the possible leaching o polymer additives, organic compounds

were compared. A trained human panel used Flavor Prole Analysis

and oxidation o the surace o the pipe during extrusion – all o which

to assess odors. A chemical process commonly reerred to as SPME-

can aect the taste and smell o the water.

GC-MS (or more ormally known as solid phase m icroextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), which utilizes var ious ber

This study leaves no doubt that CPVC is the preerred choice rom a

elements to extract compounds in the water, was used to dete ct and

taste and smell viewpoint, as well the absorption o disinectants used

identiy organic components. And total organic carbon was determined

in the water trea tment process. Whether you’re a contractor working in

using an automated Sievers Sievers® 800 Portable TOC Analyzer.

new construction or remodeling, or the engine er or specier or a major commercial or industria l project, it’s it’s important to understand water

The study urther took into account recent changes in water treatment

quality changes imparted by pipe materials in order to make smart

in the U.S., including the increased use o monochloramines to disinect

decisions relative to the products you use.

water instead o chlorine. Both chlor ine and monochloramine levels were determined using the DPD (diethyl-p-phenylenediamine) (diethyl-p-phenylenediamine) method,

Study Details

which is a popular testing technique used to monitor water quality in

There are many considerations when choosing a piping material – cost,

both pools and spas across the globe. Through this test, a tablet interacts

reliability, saety, saety, long-term maintenance requ irements, to name

with the water to turn it a shade o pink, depending on the intensity o 

 just a ew. ew. In rec ent years, polymer pipes have gained market share

the chlorine concentration in the water.

particularly in residential but also in commercial applications because o  their superior perormance in all o these areas.

The test was designed to accomplish two objectives: (1) to investigate the sensory properties o water with either chlorine or chloramines when

One questionable area regarding t he use o polymer materials, however,

it came into contact with di erent piping materials; (2) to i nvestigate nvestigate

has been the possible introduction o perceptible tastes and odors that

changes in residual disinectant and leaching o organic chemicals rom

either occur duri ng the extrusion process or dur ing the pipe’s pipe’s interaction

pipe when in contact with drinking water.

with various water treatment disinectants. The study conrmed that not all plastics produce the sa me results with regard to the possible leaching

All testing was conducted under “typical” drinking water quality

o polymer additives, organic compounds and oxidation o the surace o 

conditions. The Utility Quick Test, a standard leaching protocol

the pipe during extrusion.

or new materials, was conducted at room temperature using a low alkalinity water o pH 7.8-8 with no disinectant, 2 mg/L chlorine,

Specically, CPVC CPVC perormed consistently higher when compared

or 4 mg/L monochloramine. This test consisted o three consecutive

to copper, high-density polyethylene polyethylene (HDPE), epoxy lining a nd the

72-96 hour leaching/fushing periods and included triplicate testing o 

PEX piping selected or the study. In act according to the report:

all pipe types.

Results comparing the polymer materials indicated

As or copper, the results indicate that it consumed

that CPVC imparted the ewest organic compounds

nearly all the residual disinectant but released ew

to the water, consumed the least amount o 

organic compounds or odors.

disinectants, and produced no noticeable odors. All other polymer materials imparted distinct

The below table summarizes the impacts o the

odors and organic chemicals into the water and

various polymer piping materials on both the sensory

were shown to consume residual disinectant.

(taste and smell) and chemical quality o drinking

O all the materials tested, epoxy lining had the

water. It is interesting to note that while some

most dramatic eect on water quality, imparti ng a

materials perormed well in certain categories, they

moderate “plastic-putty-glue” odor, leaching 0.4-

under-perormed in others. The best-perorming

0.6 mg/L organic car bon including the compounds

PEX pipe, or example, leached the greatest amount

bisphenol A, styrene, toluene, nonylphenol and

o organic carbon, as well as the greatest number o 

benzaldehyde. It also consumed nearly all the

volatile organic compounds, but did not c ontribute

residual chlorine and chloramines.

the most intense odors (although it did contribute a variety o odors). HDPE leached only a minor

In contrast, HDPE consumed a low amount o residual disinectant and

amount o organic carbon (but many specic organics) yet imparted the

released only about 0.1 mg/L organic ca rbon to the water including

greatest odor intensity.

phenol, bisphenol-A, tetradecane, cyclohexadiene, cyclohexanone, and cyclopentanone. The overall odor imparted to the water rom HDPE

Only CPVC perormed consistently well across the categories. Not only

had a moderate intensity and was described as “waxy/plastic/citrus.”

did it leach the least amount o Total Organic Compounds (TOC) and

Panelists described the HDPE odor as “chemical/plastic” in the presence

have the ewest number o compounds identied by SPME-G C-MS, but

o chlorine and “waxy-crayon/plastic” in water with chloramines. The

it also had the least impact on water aesthetics, which meant there was

presence o disinectants did not appear to alter the intensity o the

no oensive taste or smell to water fowing through CPVC piping. Not

odors. Despite their overall similar ities, various PEX piping products

only does this conclusion support the selection o CPVC but it suggests

perormed dierently in the tests, with some pipe producing more

that it is the specic organic chemicals and not the concentration o 

odors than others. Water in contact with the best perorming PEX

organic carbon present in the water that determines odor intensity and

product possessed weak to moderate intensity odors, leached about

aesthetic impact. Additionally, there did not appear to b e any correlation

1 mg/L organic carbon, and consumed up to 0.5 mg/L ree chlorine.

between the type o disinectant and amount o organic carbon leached.

Ethyl-t-buyl ether (EtBE) was ound to contribute signicantly to the

Both chlorine and monochloramine had minimal eect on the intensity

characteristic “burning-solvent/plastic” odor o the better perorming

o the odors associated with the polymer.

PEX pipe.

Impact on Drinking Water Quality

Parameter (short-term testing)

Increased Odors  – sensory annoyance

Organic Carbon Release Chlorine Consumption Chloramine Consumption



Best Performing PEX

Worst Performing PEX



























(1 indicates least impact to water quality; 5 indicates greatest impact)

The Lubrizol Corporation


Sponsor Documents


No recommend documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips


Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips


Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in