Valley Central School District Proposed Budget 2013-2014

Valley Central School District Proposed Budget 2013-2014

VOTER REGISTRATION
JUNE 10, 2013 1:00 P.M. - 8:00 P.M.

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

BUDGET HEARING
JUNE 10, 2013 5:30 P.M. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING

VOTE DATE
JUNE 18, 2013 7:00 A.M. - 9:00 P.M. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

INDEX
Page Letter to Residents .................................................................. i-ii Voter Qualifications & Information ........................................... iii Proposed Budget for 2013-2014.............................................. 1A - 6

BOARD OF EDUCATION 2012-2013 Term Expiration President Robert W. Santo 15 Chandler Circle, Montgomery, NY 12549 Elizabeth Blashka 102 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, NY 12549 Joy D. Crist 55 Crist Lane, Walden, NY 12586 Chris Ann Harper-O’Connor 20 Van Dale Court, Walden, NY 12586 Sonia Lewis 815 Homestead Avenue, Maybrook, NY 12543 Steven H. Mosenson 114 Coleman Road, Walden, NY 12586 Kevin Reidy 103 Camp Orange Road, Middletown, NY 10941 2014

Vice President

2014

Member

2015

Member

2013

Member

2015

Member

2013

Member

2013

June 2013

Dear Resident, In the late 90s, the New York State Legislature redefined how school budgets are presented to ensure a better understanding of how tax dollars are spent in local school districts. As a result, Valley Central, along with all other school districts, presents its expenses in three parts with comparative budget figures from the previous year. This format allows voters to view the areas of program, administration and capital against the costs from the prior year. As you review the attached budget, you can see areas that have increased and decreased from the previous year and see the comparative difference among the three areas. A Property Tax Report Card must be prepared and filed with the State and local newspapers. The Six-Day Budget Notice is also required by the State and will be mailed to all District residents following the Budget Hearing. For this re-vote of the 2013-2014 budget the Board is recommending a budget under the tax cap. This has meant additional cuts to programs and personnel of about $3 Million which would have been preserved by piercing the cap in the first vote (May 21). If the budget fails this time, the increase to the levy must be zero causing an additional $2 Million in cuts over what has already been cut from the instructional and extracurricular program. Since the first proposed budget was defeated, the Board of Education had three options: they could resubmit the budget in its original form, submit a revised budget, or adopt a contingency budget. The Board of Education chose to submit a revised budget that is below the tax cap. If voters fail to approve the proposed budget on the second vote, the District must adopt a Contingency Budget since two votes are the maximum permitted under current legislation. In a Contingency Budget, the levy for the Contingency Budget year must be zero and may not exceed the levy in the preceding year. Specifically, for the proposed 2013-2014 budget, the Contingency Budget would be reduced by an additional $2,124,769 due to reduction in the use of fund balance. This would mean additional reductions to staffing and programs. Please note that the new proposed 2013-2014 tax levy is below the state tax cap and therefore requires a 50% majority to pass. This year's budget re-vote will be held on Tuesday, June 18th from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. in each of our five elementary schools.

-i-

VOTER QUALIFICATIONS & INFORMATION A person is entitled to vote at any school meeting (Annual District Election and Budget Vote) for the election of school district officers and upon all other matters which may be brought before such meeting, who is a qualified registered voter in the school district; in order to register, the applicant must meet the following criteria: • • • Be a citizen of the United States Be eighteen (18) years of age or older on June 18, 2013 Be a resident within the district for a period of not less than thirty (30) days prior to the Annual District Election and Budget Vote at which he or she offers to vote

No person shall have the right to register for or vote at any school meeting or election who would not be qualified to register for or vote at an election in accordance with the provisions of Section 5-106 of the Election Law. This includes convicted felons and those adjudged mentally incompetent by a court. Qualified voters may vote on any question brought before any annual or special school meeting. It is not essential that a person be a taxpayer to vote on propositions for raising money by tax on the district. For your convenience, new voter registration is set for Monday, June 10 between 1:00 and 8:00 p.m. at our elementary schools. Any resident who registered and voted at an annual or special district meeting or general election within the last four (4) calendar years will be eligible to vote on Tuesday, June 18, 2013. Questions on voter qualifications can be directed to the Valley Central School District Administration Office at 457-2400, ext. 18122.

-iii-

Valley Central School District Revote
CODE A1010 ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) BOARD OF EDUCATION Board of Education Expenditures incurred by the Board for supplies, travel, meetings, and conferences. District Clerk Expenditures for supplies, postage, servicing of machines and portion of clerical salary in support of the District Clerk’s office. District Meeting New voting machines required add substantial costs. Expenditures for printing, advertising, payments to election officials, absentee ballots, and supplies. Total cost: BOARD OF EDUCATION CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION Superintendent Salaries of the Superintendent, Superintendent’s Assistant and negotiated benefits, equipment, other expenses, and supplies. Assistant Superintendent for Business Salaries of the Assistant Superintendent for Business, clerical and accounting staff, contractual expenses, and supplies. Auditing Services Annual Audit by External Auditor, Internal Auditor, and stipend for Internal Claims Auditor. District Treasurer Stipend of Treasurer. Receiver of Taxes The T/o Montgomery employs the Receiver of Taxes, but the District pays a portion of the salary for tax collections in the Towns of Crawford, Wallkill, Hamptonburgh, and Shawangunk. Total cost: SUPERINTENDENT AND BUSINESS OFFICE STAFF Legal Services School District Attorney and other legal fees. Personnel Administration Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services and Human Resources and clerical staff, expenditures for supplies, recruiting costs, and advertising. Public Information and Services Budget brochures and newsletters. Total cost: STAFF Total cost: CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION CODE 2012-2013 BUDGET 13,900 2013-2014 BUDGET 13,900

A1040

1,000

-

A1060

63,000

41,000

77,900 2012-2013 BUDGET 319,090

54,900 2013-2014 BUDGET 319,357

CODE A1240

A1310

535,130

511,103

A1320

61,500

61,500

A1325 A1330

16,050 7,300

16,530 7,500

939,070 2012-2013 BUDGET 189,000 343,560

915,990 2013-2014 BUDGET 189,000 355,608

CODE A1420 A1430

A1480

16,000 548,560 1,487,630

8,000 552,608 1,468,598 2013-2014 BUDGET

Page 1

Valley Central School District Revote
CODE A1620 ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) CENTRAL SERVICES OPERATION and MAINTENANCE Operations of Plant Salaries of Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds and full-time and part-time custodial staff (38), equipment, supplies, other expenses, utilities, professional and technical services, and district-wide service contracts. Maintenance of Plant Salaries of full-time and part-time maintenance (5) and grounds staff (3). 2012-2013 BUDGET 4,181,950 2013-2014 BUDGET 4,119,673

A1621

688,135

646,583

A1670.45

A1680.49

Printing supplies Costs for printing elementary report cards, forms, and district-wide stationery. Printing student handbooks deleted here. Data Processing - BOCES Computer costs for attendance, student scheduling, test scoring, secondary report cards, and related hardware costs. Total cost: CENTRAL SERVICES SPECIAL ITEMS Insurance Insurance premiums for fire, auto, liability, vandalism, and student accident. School Association Dues Costs of memberships in state, regional, and county associations. Refund of Property Taxes Refund of prior year’s collected taxes due to reductions in assessments caused by tax grievances. Administrative Charges - BOCES District’s portion of BOCES administrative expenses. Dorm Authority/Rent and Capital Construction Charge District’s share of the cost of operating and maintaining BOCES buildings. Total cost: SPECIAL ITEMS INSTRUCTION and STAFF DEVELOPMENT Supervision of Regular Instruction Curriculum Development and Supervision Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, and clerical staff in administrator's offices, equipment , supplies, and substantial portion of district staff development. Supervision of Regular Instruction Salaries of principals (7), assistant principals (8) and clerical staff (secretaries), equipment, supplies and other expenses such as postage, conferences, graduation expenses. Staff Development Partial costs for staff development.
Total cost: SUPERVISION OF INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT

26,875

40,650

357,000

273,520

5,253,960 2012-2013 BUDGET 259,900

5,080,426 2013-2014 BUDGET 281,900

CODE A1910

A1920 A1964 & A1980 A1981 A1989

13,500 50,000

15,000 50,000

574,000 -

591,362 -

897,400 2012-2013 BUDGET 478,450

938,262 2013-2014 BUDGET 479,510

CODE A2010

A2020

3,002,586

2,818,777

A2070

141,500 3,622,536

48,400 3,346,687

Page 2

Valley Central School District Revote
ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) CODE A2110.12 REGULAR CLASSROOM Salaries of Grades K-6 Teachers Budget reflects cost of teachers with contractual increases. Estimated 10.0 teacher reductions here. Salaries of Grades 7-12 Teachers Budget reflects costs of secondary teachers with contractual increases. Estimated 12.5 teacher reductions here. Substitute Teaching and Home Teaching Reflects costs of substitutes. Regular Classroom Paraprofessionals Salaries for Paraprofessionals. Sick-Day Incentives Attendance incentive for instructional staff. Classroom Supplies, Equipment and Other Expenses Supplies, equipment, and contractual costs for instructional purposes. Foster & Tuition Tuition paid to other school districts for Valley Central students in foster care outside of the district.. Textbooks Includes costs of textbooks for all students. BOCES Includes testing, tuition, and some staff development. Special Education Salaries of special education teachers and paraprofessionals, equipment, supplies, special education BOCES services, residential and contracted tuition, and other expenses. BOCES - Occupational Education Educational services for students who attend the vocational programs at BOCES. Total cost: REGULAR CLASSROOM 2012-2013 BUDGET 12,063,747 2013-2014 BUDGET 10,056,625

A2110.13

13,113,456

12,367,344

A2110.14 A2110.16 A2110.18 A2110

636,580 1,649,900 37,000 648,135

368,915 1,271,351 37,000 515,573

A2110.471

150,000

150,000

A2110.48 A2110.49 A2250

300,630 183,000 12,139,322

300,630 198,640 14,035,631

A2280.49

870,000

870,000

41,791,770

40,171,709

Page 3

Valley Central School District Revote
CODE A2330 ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) SPECIAL SCHOOLS Special Schools Costs to operate Evening H.S., CAS. 2012-2013 BUDGET 107,000 107,000 2012-2013 BUDGET 788,079 2013-2014 BUDGET 158,520 158,520 2013-2014 BUDGET 393,501

Total cost: SPECIAL SCHOOLS
CODE A2610 INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA School Library and Audio Visual Salaries of librarians and clerical staff, library and A/V equipment and supplies and audio, video and computer repairs. Computer Assisted Instruction Computer hardware/software and State aided computer hardware/software expenditures. Total cost: INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES Attendance Salaries of attendance teacher, clerical staff, supplies, equipment, and other expenses. Guidance Salaries for guidance counselors, clerical staff, equipment, supplies and other expenses. Health Services/School Nurses Salaries of clerical staff and nurses (10), plus additional time for school nurses at the District’s non public schools, equipment, supplies, and other expenses. District also pays for health services of district resident private school students. Psychological Services Salaries of psychologists and clerical staff, equipment, supplies, and other expenses. Educational Related Support Services Salaries of student assistance counselors, occupational and physical therapists, supplies and other expenses. Speech and Social Work Services Salaries of speech teachers, supplies, and other expenses. Pupil Personnel Services - Special Schools Salaries of Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services and Human Resources, Director and Assistant Director of Special Education, office staff, equipment, supplies, and other expenses. Total cost: PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES

A2630

721,340

756,050

1,509,419 2012-2013 BUDGET 83,395

1,149,551 2013-2014 BUDGET 78,663

CODE A2805

A2810

1,035,023

966,334

A2815

880,069

831,714

A2820

867,500

805,982

A2823

249,612

287,614

A2825 A2830

1,211,050 423,950

1,185,414 454,140

4,750,599

4,609,861

Page 4

Valley Central School District Revote
CODE A2850 ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) CO-CURRICULAR and INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS Co-Curricular Activities Salaries of chaperones, class advisors and advisors to Yearbook, Student Newspaper, Student Government, Plays, etc. Interscholastic Sports, Grades 7-12 Salaries of coaches for interscholastic sports, supplies, uniforms, equipment reconditioning, officials, dues, entry fees, and expenses for pool. Total cost: CO-CURRICULAR AND INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS PUPIL TRANSPORTATION District Transportation Fuel costs. Contract Transportation Cost for transportation of pupils to and from the public, non-public and special education schools. Total cost: TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS State Retirement Civil service employees' retirement costs. A portion of expense paid from district reserve. Teachers’ Retirement District’s share of retirement plan for professional staff. Social Security District’s share of Social Security and Medicare for employees. Workers’ Compensation Insurance Premiums paid by the District as required by law. District is a member of a self-funded plan. Unemployment Insurance An expense required by State and Federal Law. Health Insurance District’s share for health and life insurance premiums. District is a member of a self-funded plan as well as two other plans. Dental and Vision Insurance District’s share for dental and vision plan for employees. Accumulated Sick And Vacation Days Buyback of accumulated retiree sick and vacation days. Total cost: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2012-2013 BUDGET 155,000 2013-2014 BUDGET 159,650

A2855

587,500

417,062

742,500

576,712

CODE A5510 A5540.4

2012-2013 BUDGET 630,500 5,424,800

2013-2014 BUDGET 661,915 5,628,505

6,055,300 2012-2013 BUDGET 1,100,000

6,290,420 2013-2014 BUDGET 1,990,022

CODE A9010.8

A9020.8 A9030.8 A9040.8

4,872,140 3,717,274 464,836

5,718,760 3,483,558 507,394

A9050.8 A9060.8

365,000 9,450,348

365,000 9,453,893

A9065.8 A9070

629,526

517,090 170,000

20,599,124

22,205,717

Page 5

Valley Central School District Revote
CODE A9710 ADOPTED BUDGET (6/3/13) DEBT SERVICE, CAPITAL PROJECTS, BORROWING COSTS and INTERFUND TRANSFERS Principal and Interest Long term debt service and short-term borrowing should State Aid payments fail to be made by NYS. Transfer to Special Aid Funds and Cafeteria Fund Transfer to Federal Fund for the Summer Handicapped Program, and continued support for student food service. Transfer to Capital Funds Not currently used. Total cost: DEBT SERVICE, CAPITAL PROJECTS, and INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2012-2013 BUDGET 2,980,000 2013-2014 BUDGET 3,003,000

A9901.95

290,000

310,000

A9950.9

3,270,000

3,313,000

Total cost: GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION

90,165,138

89,364,363

Page 6

Valley Central School District 2013-2014 Fiscal Accountability Report

SDL: 4490

LEA: 441301060000

The New York State School Report Card Fiscal Accountability Supplement for Valley Central School District (Montgomery)
New York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general education and special education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below. 2010-2011 School Year This School District Similar District Group Total of All School Districts in NY State Instructional Expenditures Pupils Expenditures Per Pupil Instructional Expenditures Pupils Expenditures Per Pupil Instructional Expenditures Pupils Expenditures Per Pupil General Education $47,871,878 4,729 $10,123 $7,820,663,210 798,424 $9,795 $29,473,160,406 2,688,528 $10,963 Special Education $18,377,050 775 $23,712 $3,172,283,304 110,978 $28,585 $12,260,104,540 412,226 $29,741

Similar District Group Description: Average Need/Resource Capacity
Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included. The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education program. Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included. The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the 2010-11 school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included. Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the generaleducation classroom may benefit students not classified as having disabilities.

2010-2011 School Year Total Expenditures Per Pupil

This School District $17,810

Similar District Group $18,876

Total of All School Districts in NY State $20,410

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures. The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

SDL: 4490

LEA: 441301060000

The New York State School Report Card Information about Students with Disabilities for Valley Central School District (Montgomery)
New York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below. Student Counts as of October 4, 2011 Student Placement -Percent of Time Inside Regular Classroom 80% or more 40% to 79% Less than 40% Separate Settings Other Settings This School District Count of Percentage of Students with Students with Disabilities Disabilities 314 164 229 31 28 41.0% 21.4% 29.9% 4.0% 3.7% Similar District Group Percentage of Students with Disabilities 58.1% 18.8% 16.7% 4.1% 2.3% Total of All School Districts in NY State Percentage of Students with Disabilities 57.3% 11.7% 22.1% 6.1% 2.8%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and verified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on October 4, 2011. The percentages represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special education services they receive. Rounding of percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

School-age Students with Disabilities Classification Rate
2011-12 School Year Special Ed Classification Rate This School District 15.2% Similar District Group 12.1% Total of All School Districts in NY State 12.8%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE) responsibility to ensure the provision of special education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Group Description: Average Need/Resource Capacity
Similar District Groups are identified according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information about this categorization is on the Internet at: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

Valley Central School District 2011-2012 Report Card

The New York State Report Card
2011–12

District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000 Superintendent RICHARD HOOLEY Telephone (845) 457-2400 Grades PK-12, UE, US Need/Resource Capacity Category Average Need Districts

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents’ effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school’s or district’s strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. State assessments are designed to help ensure that all students reach high learning standards. They show whether students are getting the knowledge and skills they need to succeed at the elementary, middle, and commencement levels and beyond. The State requires that students who are not making appropriate progress toward the standards receive academic supports.

This report includes: 1
Profile
This section shows comprehensive data relevant to this school’s or district’s learning environment, including information about enrollment, attendance and suspensions, and staff.

2 Student Performance
This section shows student performance on standardized assessments at the elementary, middle, and commencement levels.

3 Student Outcomes
This section shows outcomes for graduates and noncompleters, including postgraduation plans of completers.

For more information:
Office of Information and Reporting Services New York State Education Department Room 863 EBA Albany, NY 12234 Email: [email protected]

March 25, 2013

Page 1

1 Profile
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Enrollment
2009–10
Pre-K Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Ungraded Elementary Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Ungraded Secondary Total K–12

Enrollment Information
2010–11
87 333 324 354 340 339 370 374 4 386 387 435 418 355 375 16 4810

2011–12
86 314 322 319 350 323 341 371 25 370 388 421 390 389 334 26 4683

86 327 357 351 340 370 374 372 4 395 378 443 378 387 364 13 4853

Enrollment counts are as of Basic Educational Data System (BEDS) day, which is typically the first Wednesday of October of the school year. Students who attend BOCES programs on a part-time basis are included in a school’s and district's enrollment. Students who attend BOCES on a full-time basis or who are placed full time by the district in an out-of-district placement are not included in a school’s or district's enrollment. The state public enrollment includes public school districts, charter schools, and NYSED-operated programs. Students classified by districts as "pre-first" are included in first grade counts. Kindergarten and Pre-K counts include halfand full-day students.

Average Class Size
2009–10
Common Branch Grade 8 English Mathematics Science Social Studies Grade 10 English Mathematics Science Social Studies

2010–11
22

2011–12
22

Average Class Size Information
Average Class Size is the total registration in specified classes divided by the number of those classes with registration. Common Branch refers to self-contained classes in Grades 1–6.

21

23 23 20 23

23 23 20 24

24 24 24 24

22 22 22 26

24 23 23 25

25 23 23 25

March 25, 2013

Page 2

1 Profile
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Demographic Factors
2009–10 #
Eligible for Free Lunch Reduced Price Lunch Limited English Proficient Racial/Ethnic Origin American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial

Demographic Factors Information
2010–11 #
847 358 46

2011–12 #
821 381 38

%
17% 8% 1%

%
18% 7% 1%

%
18% 8% 1%

826 366 45

Eligible for Free Lunch and Reduced-Price Lunch percentages are determined by dividing the number of approved lunch applicants by the Basic Educational Data System (BEDS) enrollment in full-day Kindergarten through Grade 12.

16 505 720 98 3513 1

0% 10% 15% 2% 72% 0%

16 508 792 90 3396 8

0% 11% 16% 2% 71% 0%

15 488 788 86 3269 37

0% 10% 17% 2% 70% 1%

Attendance and Suspensions
2008–09 #
Annual Attendance Rate Student Suspensions

Attendance and Suspensions Information
2009–10 # %
95% 323 7% 299

2010–11 # %
95% 6%

%
95%

310

6%

Annual Attendance Rate is determined by dividing the school’s (or district's) total actual attendance by the total possible attendance for a school year. A school’s (or district's) actual attendance is the sum of the number of students in attendance on each day the school (or district's schools) was open during the school year. Possible attendance is the sum of the number of enrolled students who should have been in attendance on each day the school (or schools) was open during the school year. The state’s Annual Attendance Rate is a weighted average of all districtlevel attendance rates. Student Suspension rate is determined by dividing the number of students who were suspended from school (not including inschool suspensions) for one full day or longer anytime during the school year by the Basic Educational Data System (BEDS) day enrollments for that school year. A student is counted only once, regardless of whether the student was suspended one or more times during the school year.

March 25, 2013

Page 3

1 Profile
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Teacher Qualifications
2009–10
Total Number of Teachers Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate Percent Teaching Out of Certification Percent with Fewer than Three Years of Experience Percentage with Master’s Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate Total Number of Core Classes Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School* Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District** Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in High-Poverty Schools Statewide Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in Low-Poverty Schools Statewide Total Number of Classes Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
*Not available at the district or statewide level. **Not available for charter schools or at the statewide level.

Teacher Qualifications Information
2010–11
382 0% 0% 3% 41% 881 N/A 0% 5%

2011–12
371 0% 0% 2% 46% 873 N/A 0% 7%

403 0% 0% 3% 35% 981 N/A 0% 6%

The Percent Teaching Out of Certification for public schools is the percent doing so on more than an incidental basis; that is, the percent teaching for more than five periods per week outside certification. Core Classes are primarily K–6 common branch, English, mathematics, science, social studies, art, music, and foreign languages. To be Highly Qualified, a teacher must have at least a Bachelor’s degree, be certified to teach in the subject area or otherwise in accordance with state standards, and show subject matter competency. In public schools, a teacher who taught one class outside of the certification area(s) is counted as Highly Qualified provided that 1) the teacher had been determined by the school or district through the HOUSSE process or other state-accepted methods to have demonstrated acceptable subject knowledge and teaching skills and 2) the class in question was not the sole assignment reported. Credit for incidental teaching does not extend beyond a single assignment. Independent of Highly Qualified Teacher status, any assignment for which a teacher did not hold a valid certificate still registers as teaching out of certification. In charter schools, a teacher is counted as Highly Qualified if the teacher has at least a Bachelor’s degree, is certified to teach, and shows subject matter competency. Enabling legislation considers charter school teachers to be certified if they hold any valid teaching certificate. Enabling legislation also permits up to 30 percent (with a maximum of five) of charter school teachers to be without certification and to be considered Highly Qualified if they meet all remaining criteria. High-poverty and low-poverty schools are those schools in the upper and lower quartiles, respectively, for percentage of students eligible for a free or reduced-price lunch.

1%

0%

1%

1467 1%

1382 0%

1340 0%

Teacher Turnover Rate
2008–09
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer than Five Years of Experience Turnover Rate of All Teachers

2009–10
36% 14%

2010–11
23% 12%

18% 8%

Staff Counts
Total Other Professional Staff Total Paraprofessionals* Assistant Principals Principals
*Not available at the school level.

2009–10
43 164 8 7

2010–11
43 144 8 7

2011–12
41 166 8 7

Teacher Turnover Rate Information
Teacher Turnover Rate for a specified school year is the number of teachers in that school year who were not teaching in the following school year divided by the number of teachers in the specified school year, expressed as a percentage.

Staff Counts Information
Other Professionals includes administrators, guidance counselors, school nurses, psychologists, and other professionals who devote more than half of their time to nonteaching duties.

March 25, 2013

Page 4

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

This section contains annual assessment data for students at the elementary, middle, and commencement levels as well as the performance of secondary-level cohorts on standardized achievement assessments.

New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Assessments
The New York State Testing Program assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics in grades 3 through 8. The Performance Level Descriptors for these assessments are provided below:

English Language Arts
Level 1: Below Standard
Student performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 2: Meets Basic Standard
Student performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 3: Meets Proficiency Standard
Student performance demonstrates an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency Standard
Student performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Mathematics
Level 1: Below Standard
Student performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 2: Meets Basic Standard
Student performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 3: Meets Proficiency Standard
Student performance demonstrates an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency Standard
Student performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA)
The New York State Alternate Assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics to ungraded students with severe cognitive disabilities whose ages are equivalent to graded students in grades 3 through 8 and secondary level. They are administered in science to students with disabilities age equivalent to graded students in grades 4, 8, and secondary level. And they are administered in social studies at the secondary level only.

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests (NYSESLAT)
The New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests are administered in grades K through 12 to limited English proficient students.

Secondary-Level Cohorts
A secondary-level cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday in a particular year. The 2008 cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The 2007 cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008. For more detailed information on cohort definitions, see Secondary-Level Cohort Definitions at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/sirs/.

March 25, 2013

Page 5

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 3 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 667 2011 Mean Score: 666

*Range:
100%

2-4 644–780
88% 91%

3-4 663–780

4 694–780

2-4

3-4

4

86% 87% 64% 61% 56% 56%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 310 300 226 202

7% 24

5% 15

7%

5%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 352 183 169 1 36 55 5 253 2 8 290 62 350 2 121 231 352
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 330 158 172 2 36 54 4 233 1 7 271 59 326 4 110 220 1 329
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

88% 91% 85% – 83% 85% – 89% – 88% 95% 55% – – 77% 94% 88%

64% 67% 62% – 44% 58% – 68% – 75% 74% 18% – – 45% 74% 64%

7% 8% 5% – 0% 2% – 9% – 0% 8% 0% – – 2% 9% 7%

91% 92% 90% – 78% 89% – 93% – 100% 97% 63% – – 85% 94% – –

61% 70% 53% – 50% 63% – 63% – 43% 69% 24% – – 46% 69% – –

5% 6% 3% – 6% 2% – 5% – 14% 6% 0% – – 2% 6% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 3 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 3

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

11 0

9 N/A

8 N/A

5 N/A

5 0

5 N/A

5 N/A

4 N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 3 March 25, 2013 0 N/A N/A N/A

Total
0 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 6

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 3 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 692 2011 Mean Score: 691

*Range:
100%

2-4 662–770
97% 94%

3-4 684–770

4 707–770

2-4

3-4

4

91% 91% 70% 68% 61% 60% 21% 68

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 341 311 245 225

14% 51

13% 13%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 352 183 169 1 36 55 5 253 2 8 290 62 350 2 121 231 352
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 330 158 172 2 36 53 4 234 1 7 271 59 326 4 110 220 1 329
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

97% 96% 98% – 83% 100% – 98% – 100% 99% 85% – – 92% 100% 97%

70% 66% 73% – 53% 55% – 75% – 63% 76% 42% – – 50% 80% 70%

14% 15% 14% – 0% 16% – 16% – 25% 18% 0% – – 8% 18% 14%

94% 94% 95% – 83% 91% – 97% – 100% 98% 78% – – 86% 98% – –

68% 70% 67% – 56% 58% – 72% – 71% 77% 27% – – 49% 78% – –

21% 18% 23% – 17% 11% – 24% – 14% 24% 7% – – 10% 26% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 3 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

11

11

10

7

5

5

5

3

March 25, 2013

Page 7

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 4 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 682 2011 Mean Score: 673

*Range:
100%

2-4 637–775
96% 94%

3-4 671–775

4 722–775

2-4

3-4

4

91% 92% 72% 58% 59% 57%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 305 317 228 196

6% 18

1% 4

5%

2%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 317 153 164 2 30 55 5 223 2 9 264 53 314 3 111 206 1 316
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 336 157 179 2 25 64 7 238 9 265 71 334 2 118 218 1 335
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

96% 96% 96% – 87% 100% – 97% – 89% 99% 81% – – 91% 99% – –

72% 74% 70% – 70% 67% – 74% – 67% 80% 32% – – 57% 80% – –

6% 8% 4% – 3% 4% – 7% – 0% 7% 0% – – 2% 8% – –

94% 96% 93% – 92% 92% – 95% 100% 100% 75% – – 92% 96% – –

58% 62% 55% – 40% 50% – 61% 89% 69% 20% – – 47% 64% – –

1% 2% 1% – 0% 0% – 2% 0% 2% 0% – – 0% 2% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 4 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 4

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

10 1

10 N/A

10 N/A

6 N/A

4 0

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 4 March 25, 2013 1 N/A N/A N/A

Total
0 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 8

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 4 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 694 2011 Mean Score: 691

*Range:
100%

2-4 636–800
99% 98%

3-4 676–800

4 707–800

2-4

3-4

4

95% 94% 78% 75% 69% 67% 30% 26% 30% 27%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 314 327 248 250

95

87

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 318 154 164 2 30 55 5 224 2 9 265 53 314 4 111 207 1 317
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 335 157 178 2 25 63 7 238 9 264 71 333 2 118 217 1 334
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

99% 98% 99% – 97% 100% – 99% – 100% 99% 96% – – 97% 100% – –

78% 75% 80% – 70% 76% – 79% – 78% 84% 49% – – 68% 83% – –

30% 28% 32% – 20% 18% – 33% – 56% 34% 8% – – 16% 37% – –

98% 97% 98% – 96% 95% – 98% 100% 100% 90% – – 94% 100% – –

75% 72% 77% – 68% 75% – 74% 100% 82% 48% – – 68% 78% – –

26% 29% 23% – 12% 24% – 27% 56% 31% 7% – – 18% 30% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 4 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

10

10

9

5

4

–

–

–

March 25, 2013

Page 9

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 4 Science
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 88 2011 Mean Score: 86

Range:
100%

2-4 45–100
99% 99%

3-4 65–100
96% 94%

4 85–100

2-4

3-4

4

97% 98% 74% 71%

89% 88% 57% 52%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 314 326 306 310 236 234

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 318 154 164 2 29 55 5 225 2 9 264 54 314 4 113 205 1 317
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 330 155 175 2 25 61 7 235 9 261 69 328 2 117 213 1 329
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

99% 99% 98% – 97% 100% – 99% – 100% 100% 94% – – 97% 100% – –

96% 96% 96% – 90% 98% – 96% – 100% 98% 85% – – 93% 98% – –

74% 69% 79% – 69% 67% – 76% – 78% 80% 48% – – 61% 81% – –

99% 99% 98% – 96% 95% – 100% 100% 100% 94% – – 98% 99% – –

94% 94% 94% – 80% 92% – 96% 100% 98% 80% – – 91% 96% – –

71% 67% 74% – 64% 69% – 71% 89% 77% 48% – – 62% 76% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 4 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

10

10

10

9

4

–

–

–

March 25, 2013

Page 10

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 5 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 671 2011 Mean Score: 667

*Range:
100%

2-4 648–795
92% 92%

3-4 668–795

4 700–795

2-4

3-4

4

89% 89% 60% 54% 58% 54%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 318 340 206 201

2% 7

1% 3

5%

4%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 344 159 185 2 23 70 5 242 2 9 268 76 342 2 133 211 1 343
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 369 185 184 2 44 67 1 255 47 306 63 366 3 133 236 1 368
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

92% 94% 91% – 87% 90% – 93% – 100% 100% 67% – – 89% 94% – –

60% 69% 52% – 48% 60% – 61% – 56% 73% 14% – – 47% 68% – –

2% 3% 2% – 0% 1% – 2% – 11% 3% 0% – – 1% 3% – –

92% 96% 89% – – 87% – 94% 89% 98% 62% – – 86% 95% – –

54% 58% 51% – – 49% – 56% 53% 63% 13% – – 38% 64% – –

1% 1% 1% – – 0% – 1% 2% 1% 0% – – 1% 1% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 5 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 5

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

8 0

8 N/A

8 N/A

5 N/A

1 0

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 5 March 25, 2013 0 N/A N/A N/A

Total
0 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 11

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 5 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 690 2011 Mean Score: 688

*Range:
100%

2-4 640–780
95% 97%

3-4 676–780

4 707–780

2-4

3-4

4

93% 94% 74% 71% 67% 66% 28% 28% 23%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 325 360 255 263

20% 74

96

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 343 159 184 2 23 70 5 241 2 9 268 75 341 2 132 211 1 342
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 370 186 184 2 44 68 1 255 47 307 63 366 4 134 236 1 369
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

95% 95% 95% – 91% 94% – 95% – 100% 98% 83% – – 92% 97% – –

74% 74% 74% – 70% 69% – 76% – 78% 84% 40% – – 67% 79% – –

28% 33% 24% – 17% 20% – 30% – 56% 34% 5% – – 22% 32% – –

97% 99% 96% – – 96% – 98% 98% 100% 86% – – 96% 98% – –

71% 71% 71% – – 59% – 76% 64% 80% 27% – – 63% 75% – –

20% 24% 16% – – 9% – 22% 26% 23% 5% – – 13% 24% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 5 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

8

8

8

6

1

–

–

–

March 25, 2013

Page 12

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 6 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 664 2011 Mean Score: 666

*Range:
100%

2-4 644–785
93% 94%

3-4 662–785

4 694–785

2-4

3-4

4

89% 88% 59% 66% 56% 56%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 349 348 223 246

2% 7

5% 17

2%

4%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 377 190 187 2 49 72 1 252 1 53 313 64 373 4 148 229 1 376
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 371 181 190 40 66 11 253 1 12 316 55 367 4 120 251 1 370
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

93% 96% 89% – – 83% – 94% – 96% 98% 66% – – 86% 97% – –

59% 64% 54% – – 46% – 63% – 58% 68% 14% – – 41% 71% – –

2% 3% 1% – – 1% – 2% – 2% 2% 0% – – 1% 3% – –

94% 96% 92% 90% 94% – 94% – 92% 97% 73% – – 92% 95% – –

66% 71% 62% 50% 61% – 72% – 42% 72% 31% – – 58% 70% – –

5% 7% 3% 3% 3% – 6% – 0% 5% 0% – – 1% 6% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 6 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 6

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2 2

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

3 0

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 6 March 25, 2013 2 N/A N/A N/A

Total
0 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 13

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 6 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 673 2011 Mean Score: 680

*Range:
100%

2-4 640–780
90% 96%

3-4 674–780

4 700–780

2-4

3-4

4

92% 92% 54% 61% 18% 18% 65% 63% 31% 26%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 342 356 203 226

68

67

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 378 192 186 2 49 74 1 251 1 53 315 63 372 6 149 229 2 376
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 371 182 189 40 65 11 254 1 12 316 55 367 4 121 250 1 370
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

90% 95% 86% – – 86% – 92% – 91% 97% 59% 91% 50% 85% 94% – –

54% 57% 51% – – 39% – 61% – 42% 62% 11% 55% 0% 38% 64% – –

18% 17% 19% – – 8% – 21% – 19% 21% 3% 18% 0% 11% 22% – –

96% 97% 95% 98% 95% – 96% – 92% 98% 84% – – 95% 96% – –

61% 63% 59% 35% 63% – 64% – 67% 68% 22% – – 53% 65% – –

18% 20% 16% 8% 17% – 20% – 25% 21% 2% – – 7% 23% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 6 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2

–

–

–

3

–

–

–

March 25, 2013

Page 14

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 7 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 667 2011 Mean Score: 665

*Range:
100%

2-4 642–790
95% 94%

3-4 665–790

4 698–790

2-4

3-4

4

92% 91% 58% 50% 52% 48% 4% 4%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 346 365 213 193

2% 8

2% 9

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 365 179 186 43 65 10 247
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 387 187 200 4 45 65 10 263 14 327 60 385 2 112 275 1 386
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

95% 96% 94% 93% 94% 90% 96%

58% 68% 49% 44% 58% 50% 61%

2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 0% 3%

94% 98% 91% – 96% 94% – 95% 86% 99% 68% – – 93% 95% – –

50% 58% 43% – 42% 43% – 53% 50% 57% 10% – – 33% 57% – –

2% 4% 1% – 2% 2% – 3% 0% 2% 2% – – 0% 3% – –

308 57 363 2 136 229 1 364

99% 72% – – 92% 97% – –

67% 12% – – 49% 64% – –

3% 0% – – 0% 3% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 7 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 7

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

4 0

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

9 1

9 N/A

9 N/A

6 N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 7 March 25, 2013 0 N/A N/A N/A

Total
1 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 15

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 7 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 679 2011 Mean Score: 678

*Range:
100%

2-4 639–800
96% 94%

3-4 670–800

4 694–800

2-4

3-4

4

91% 92% 64% 64% 65% 65% 23% 26% 31% 30%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 349 365 235 247

83

101

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 365 179 186 42 65 10 248
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 388 188 200 4 46 65 10 263 14 328 60 385 3 113 275 1 387
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

96% 96% 95% 98% 97% 90% 95%

64% 70% 59% 43% 63% 70% 68%

23% 25% 20% 10% 23% 10% 25%

94% 96% 92% – 93% 91% – 95% 93% 99% 65% – – 91% 95% – –

64% 68% 60% – 43% 55% – 69% 64% 71% 23% – – 48% 70% – –

26% 31% 22% – 17% 15% – 30% 29% 30% 7% – – 13% 31% – –

307 58 363 2 135 230 1 364

99% 79% – – 94% 97% – –

72% 24% – – 54% 70% – –

26% 5% – – 12% 29% – –

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 7 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

4

–

–

–

9

8

8

3

March 25, 2013

Page 16

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 8 English Language Arts
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 659 2011 Mean Score: 657

*Range:
100%

2-4 628–790
95% 95%

3-4 658–790

4 699–790

2-4

3-4

4

93% 92% 54% 48% 50% 47%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 369 373 208 190

1% 3

2% 6

2%

2%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 387 188 199 4 50 67 9 257 13 332 55 384 3 126 261 1 386
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 393 198 195 46 66 11 270
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

95% 97% 93% – 96% 93% – 96% 85% 100% 69% – – 91% 97% – –

54% 61% 47% – 46% 43% – 58% 62% 60% 15% – – 35% 63% – –

1% 1% 1% – 0% 1% – 0% 8% 1% 0% – – 0% 1% – –

95% 96% 93% 93% 92% 91% 96%

48% 57% 39% 35% 42% 45% 52%

2% 3% 0% 2% 0% 0% 2%

347 46 389 4 99 294 393

99% 65% – – 91% 96% 95%

53% 13% – – 31% 54% 48%

2% 0% – – 0% 2% 2%

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 8 Equivalent New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)†: Grade 8

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

15 1

15 N/A

15 N/A

12 N/A

3 0

– N/A

– N/A

– N/A

Total
Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP: Grade 8 March 25, 2013 1 N/A N/A N/A

Total
0 N/A N/A N/A

† These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.

Page 17

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 8 Mathematics
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2012 Mean Score: 680 2011 Mean Score: 681

*Range:
100%

2-4 639–775
96% 96%

3-4 674–775

4 704–775

2-4

3-4

4

93% 91% 64% 65% 61% 60% 17% 15% 20% 18%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 370 376 246 254

64

58

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 385 186 199 4 50 68 9 254 13 333 52 381 4 125 260 1 384
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 393 198 195 46 66 11 270
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

96% 97% 95% – 96% 96% – 96% 92% 99% 79% – – 92% 98% – –

64% 64% 64% – 54% 53% – 69% 54% 70% 23% – – 50% 71% – –

17% 21% 13% – 10% 9% – 19% 31% 19% 2% – – 2% 24% – –

96% 97% 94% 93% 98% 100% 95%

65% 71% 58% 57% 68% 64% 65%

15% 17% 13% 7% 8% 45% 17%

347 46 389 4 99 294 393

98% 76% – – 97% 95% 96%

70% 22% – – 55% 68% 65%

16% 9% – – 7% 17% 15%

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students. * These ranges are for 2011–12 data only. Ranges for 2010–11 data are available in the 2010–11 Accountability and Overview Reports.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 8 Equivalent

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

15

14

14

10

3

–

–

–

March 25, 2013

Page 18

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Results in Grade 8 Science
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2-4
100%

3-4

4

2-4

3-4

4

98% 98%

86% 85%

93% 94% 73% 72% 38% 38% 30% 28%

2011–12 2010–11 Number of Tested Students: 377 380 332 330

148 146

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant

2011–12 School Year Total Tested 350 167 183 4 50 62 7 227 11 296 54 346 4 123 227 1 349
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested 354 175 179 45 65 8 236
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

98% 98% 97% – 98% 95% – 98% 100% 100% 85% – – 96% 99% – –

85% 87% 83% – 76% 79% – 89% 64% 92% 48% – – 75% 90% – –

32% 33% 32% – 26% 26% – 35% 36% 36% 9% – – 20% 39% – –

97% 98% 97% 96% 97% 100% 98%

83% 86% 81% 82% 77% 88% 85%

31% 29% 34% 20% 26% 25% 35%

309 45 350 4 96 258 354

99% 84% – – 98% 97% 97%

89% 44% – – 71% 88% 83%

35% 9% – – 18% 36% 31%

NOTES
The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

Other Assessments
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): Grade 8 Equivalent Regents Science

2011–12 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2010–11 School Year Total Tested
Number scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

15 35

15 35

14 35

12 35

3 35

– 35

– 35

– 35

March 25, 2013

Page 19

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Statewide 2010–11 Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
% Below Basic Grade 4 Reading Grade 8 Reading Grade 4 Mathematics Grade 8 Mathematics NOTES *Reporting standards not met. **Rounds to 0. % Basic % Proficient % Advanced

32% 24% 20% 30%

33% 41% 44% 40%

26% 31% 31% 23%

9% 4% 5% 7%

Statewide 2010–11 NAEP Participation Rates for LEP Students and Students with Disabilities
Participation Rate Grade 4 Reading Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Reading Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities Grade 4 Mathematics Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Mathematics Limited English Proficient Students with Disabilities

84% 85%

77% 84%

91% 90%

92% 91%

NOTE The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), developed in 1969, is a nationally representative assessment of the performance of United States’ students in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. history. The NAEP assessment is administered to a sampling of schools across New York State. Teachers, principals, parents, policymakers, and researchers use NAEP results to assess progress and develop ways to improve education in the United States. As part of a federal requirement, NYSED is publishing these statewide results on NAEP. There are no consequences for schools, teachers, or students based on NAEP results.

March 25, 2013

Page 20

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2-4
100%

3-4

4

2-4

3-4

4

89% 88%

87% 87%

84% 83%

82% 80% 38% 35%

2008 Cohort 2007 Cohort

35% 33%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant NOTES

2008 Cohort Number of Students 400 187 213 1 49 52 6 292 7 333 67 400 104 296 400
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2007 Cohort Number of Students 430 207 223 1 39 77 5 307 1 7 373 57 427 3 101 329 430
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

89% 93% 85% – 92% 88% – 88% 100% 94% 61% 89% 84% 91% 89%

87% 91% 84% – 92% 87% – 86% 100% 94% 55% 87% 81% 90% 87%

35% 44% 26% – 22% 35% – 37% 43% 41% 3% 35% 18% 41% 35%

88% 89% 87% – 92% 88% – 88% – 71% 92% 61% – – 84% 89% 88%

87% 88% 85% – 90% 84% – 87% – 71% 91% 56% – – 82% 88% 87%

33% 39% 28% – 15% 22% – 38% – 43% 38% 2% – – 26% 36% 33%

The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

March 25, 2013

Page 21

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
This District
Percentage scoring at level(s):

NY State Public
Percentage scoring at level(s):

2-4
100%

3-4

4

2-4

3-4

4

91% 91%

88% 89%

87% 86%

82% 81%

2008 Cohort 2007 Cohort

22% 26%

22% 25%

Results by Student Group
All Students Female Male American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Small Group Totals General-Education Students Students with Disabilities English Proficient Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Not Disadvantaged Migrant Not Migrant NOTES

2008 Cohort Number of Students 400 187 213 1 49 52 6 292 7 333 67 400 104 296 400
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

2007 Cohort Number of Students 430 207 223 1 39 77 5 307 1 7 373 57 427 3 101 329 430
Percentage scoring at level(s): 2–4 3–4 4

91% 94% 88% – 90% 88% – 91% 100% 96% 63% 91% 88% 92% 91%

88% 91% 85% – 88% 87% – 87% 100% 95% 49% 88% 81% 90% 88%

22% 25% 19% – 10% 13% – 25% 43% 26% 1% 22% 7% 27% 22%

91% 93% 88% – 92% 91% – 91% – 71% 95% 63% – – 91% 91% 91%

89% 91% 87% – 90% 90% – 90% – 71% 94% 56% – – 89% 89% 89%

26% 30% 22% – 21% 16% – 30% – 29% 30% 2% – – 15% 30% 26%

The – symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

March 25, 2013

Page 22

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

2008 Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography, U.S. History and Government, and Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
Cohort Enrollment

General-Education Students
Cohort Enrollment

Students with Disabilities
Cohort Enrollment

Percentage of students scoring: 55-64 65-84 85-100

Percentage of students scoring: 55-64 65-84 85-100

Percentage of students scoring: 55-64 65-84 85-100

Global History and Geography U.S. History and Government Science

400 400 400

5% 4% 4%

46% 35% 47%

35% 47% 40%

333 333 333

1% 1% 1%

50% 37% 48%

42% 55% 47%

67 67 67

22% 19% 19%

25% 24% 37%

1% 6% 6%

New York State Alternate Assessments (NYSAA) 2011-12
All Students Total Tested Secondary Level English Language Arts Mathematics Social Studies Science NOTES
The — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

Number of students scoring at Level: 1 2 3 4

11 11 11 11

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 3 1 3

11 8 10 8

March 25, 2013

Page 23

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Regents Exams
All Students Total Percentage of students Tested scoring at or above: 55 Comprehensive English 65 85 General-Education Students Total Percentage of students Tested scoring at or above: 55 65 85 Students with Disabilities Total Percentage of students Tested scoring at or above: 55 65 85

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

429 448 399 374 416 420 221 205

97% 99% 97% 95% 95% 95% 99% 99%

94% 95% 92% 87% 89% 90% 95% 97% 96% 78% 79% 78% 77% 75% 77% 87% 88% 95% 91% 89% 84% 79% 76% 79% 75% 83% 74% 88% 78% 88%

29% 47% 37% 20% 24% 23% 37% 41% 35% 28% 26% 24% 29% 30% 34% 45% 52% 62% 44% 43% 34% 43% 34% 34% 19% 23% 10% 47% 33% 43%

371

99%

96% 98% 96% 95% 95% 96% 95% – 96% – – – 85% 82% 87% 93% 94% 98% 93% 93% 92% 84% 83% 84% – – – – 78% –

33% 51% 41% 22% 27% 27% 37% – 35% – – – 34% 34% 41% 49% 58% 66% 47% 48% 40% 48% 38% 38% – – – – 33% –

58 41 44 62 57

86% 88% 84% 73% 68%

76% 71% 59% 47% 53%

3% 2% 5% 5% 4% 0% 33% – 40% – – – 5% 7% 4% 9% 9% 24% 19% 14% 4% 9% 4% 7% – – – – –

407 100% 355 99% 312 100% 359 363 215 204 99% 99% 99% –

Integrated Algebra

Geometry

57 68% 49% 6 100% 100% 1 – – 5 100% 100% 1 – – 1 1 82 60 75 47 43 42 53 57 76 44 56 45 1 2 2 1 0 2 – – – – 60% 52% 49% 60% 77% 88% 85% 81% 75% 61% 64% 56% – – – – – – 38% 28% 29% 38% 47% 74% 74% 61% 46% 43% 36% 42% – – – –

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

227 100% 169 92% 188 160 468 457 424 409 357 384 431 434 455 373 399 370 212 229 247 121 104 152 91% 90% 88% 87% 87% 92% 95% 98% 95% 96% 94% 90% 90% 89% 94% 96% 95% 98% 89% 94%

222 100% 168 – 187 159 386 397 349 362 314 342 378 377 379 329 343 325 211 227 245 120 104 150 – – 94% 92% 95% 97% 98% 99% 97% 99% 98% 94% 94% 93% – – – – 89% –

Global History and Geography

U.S. History and Government

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

Living Environment

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Physical Setting/Physics

NOTE The — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

March 25, 2013

Page 24

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

Regents Competency Tests
All Students Total Tested Mathematics Percent Passing: General-Education Students Total Tested Percent Passing: Students with Disabilities Total Tested Percent Passing:

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

14 11 13 5 7 12 9 7 11 7 6 12 37 37 47 18 13 15

57% 55% 62% 60% 57% 75% 67% 29% 82% 71% 67% 75% 24% 16% 47% 44% 54% 40%

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 – – – –

14 10 12 5 7 12 9 7 11 7 6 12 37 34 47 18 12 15

57% – – 60% 57% 75% 67% 29% 82% 71% 67% 75% 24% – 47% 44% – 40%

Science

Reading

Writing

Global Studies

U.S. History and Government

NOTE The — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

March 25, 2013

Page 25

2 Student Performance
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT)
All Students Percent of students scoring Total Tested in each performance level:
Interm. Begin. Prof. Adv.

General-Education Students Percent of students scoring Total Tested in each performance level:
Interm. Begin. Prof. Adv.

Students with Disabilities Percent of students scoring Total Tested in each performance level:
Begin. Interm. Prof. Adv.

Listening and Speaking (Grades K–1) Reading and Writing (Grades K–1) Listening and Speaking (Grades 2–4) Reading and Writing (Grades 2–4) Listening and Speaking (Grades 5–6) Reading and Writing (Grades 5–6) Listening and Speaking (Grades 7–8) Reading and Writing (Grades 7–8) Listening and Speaking (Grades 9–12) Reading and Writing (Grades 9–12)

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

16 16 11 16 16 11 12 8 13 12 8 13 8 8 9 8 8 9 6 7 10 6 7 10 5 7 4 5 7 4

0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 0% 0% 25% 0% 11% 17% 0% 10% 17% 14% 20% 0% 0% – 0% 0% –

6% 13% 9% 56% 38% 45% 0% 0% 0% 17% 13% 15% 0% 25% 22% 0% 13% 11% 17% 0% 10% 33% 29% 40% 0% 0% – 20% 29% –

69% 56% 9% 25% 19% 18% 25% 13% 31% 42% 38% 54% 38% 38% 11% 38% 38% 44% 0% 29% 20% 33% 0% 30% 60% 43% – 20% 29% –

25% 31% 82% 19% 31% 36% 75% 88% 69% 42% 50% 31% 38% 38% 67% 38% 50% 33% 67% 71% 60% 17% 57% 10% 40% 57% – 60% 43% –

14 13 10 14 13 10 8 7 9 8 7 9 7 7 7 7 7 7 4 6 7 4 6 7 4 6 4 4 6 4

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

2 3 1 2 3 1 4 1 4 4 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 1 0

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

NOTE The — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

March 25, 2013

Page 26

3 Student Outcomes
District VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) District ID 44-13-01-06-0000

High School Completers
All Students Number of Percentage of Students Graduates Total Graduates General-Education Students Number of Percentage of Students Graduates Students with Disabilities Number of Percentage of Students Graduates

Receiving a Regents Diploma Receiving a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Receiving an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Diploma

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

356 356 372 324 328 331 110 126 127 7 4 5

91% 92% 89% 31% 35% 34% N/A N/A N/A

317 324 335 311 309 320 109 125 127 0 0 0

98% 95% 96% 34% 39% 38%

39 32 37 13 19 11 1 1 0 7 4 5

33% 59% 30% 3% 3% 0% N/A N/A N/A

NOTE Students receiving Regents diplomas and Regents diplomas with advanced designation are considered graduates; recipients of IEP diplomas are not.

High School Non-completers
All Students Number of Students Dropped Out Percentage of Students General-Education Students Number of Students Percentage of Students Students with Disabilities Number of Students Percentage of Students

Entered Approved High School Equivalency Preparation Program Total Non-completers

2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10 2011–12 2010–11 2009–10

32 41 44 0 2 13 32 43 57

2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 3%

28 29 32 0 0 9 28 29 41

2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 2%

4 12 12 0 2 4 4 14 16

2% 4% 4% 0% 1% 1% 2% 5% 5%

Post-secondary Plans of 2011–12 Completers
All Students Number of Students To 4-year College To 2-year College To Other Post-secondary To the Military To Employment To Adult Services To Other Known Plans Plan Unknown Percentage of Students General-Education Students Number of Students Percentage of Students Students with Disabilities Number of Students Percentage of Students

154 144 8 8 45 1 3 0

42% 40% 2% 2% 12% 0% 1% 0%

150 126 4 7 30 0 0 0

47% 40% 1% 2% 9% 0% 0% 0%

4 18 4 1 15 1 3 0

9% 39% 9% 2% 33% 2% 7% 0%

March 25, 2013

Page 27

Valley Central School District 2011-2012 Accountability Report

The New York State Accountability Report 2011-12

DISTRICT: DISTRICT ID: SUPERINTENDENT: PHONE:

VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) 441301060000 RICHARD HOOLEY 845-457-2400

Data in this report are those reported by districts in the Student Information Repository System as of August 24, 2012.

On May 29, 2012, the United States Department of Education (USDE) approved New York's Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) waiver. This waiver provides New York with increased flexibility to help close the achievement gap and assist students in becoming college and career ready. New York's waiver introduced a system of identifying districts and/or schools as Reward, Focus, or Priority, based on performance in English language arts (ELA), mathematics, and science at the elementary/middle level and in ELA, mathematics, and graduation rate at the secondary level. More information on the waiver is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/esea-waiver/.

Data in The New York State Accountability Report are those used to determine Performance Indices (PIs) and make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determinations which, in turn, are used to assist in identifying districts and schools as Reward, Focus, and Priority. Explanations of how the data are used to make the determinations are available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/ESEAMaterials.html.

More Information: Office of Accountability New York State Education Department 55 Hanson Place Brooklyn, NY 11217 Email: [email protected]

April 25, 2013

1

Adequate Yearly Progress and Performance Indices
Performance Indices (PIs) and Unweighted Combined PIs are used to determine if a district or school is Priority or Focus. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for accountability groups (all students, racial/ethnic groups, students with disabilities, limited English proficient students, and economically disadvantaged students) and PIs for accountability groups and non-AYP groups (non-racial/ethnic groups, general-education students, English proficient students, not economically disadvantaged students, male and female students, and migrant and non-migrant students) are used to determine if a district or school is Reward or a school requires a Local Assistance Plan. For more information, see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/accountability/documents/NYSESEAFlexibilityWaiver_REVISED.pdf

Adequate Yearly Progress
In accordance with federal and State laws, the New York State Education Department must determine and report on the performance of students in the following areas: 1) Elementary/middle-level (grades 3 - 8) English Language Arts (ELA) 2) Elementary/middle-level (grades 3 - 8) Mathematics 3) Elementary/middle-level (grades 4 and 8) Science 4) Secondary-level (grades 9-12) ELA 5) Secondary-level (grades 9-12) Mathematics 6) Graduation Rate This performance is determined by identifying whether or not a district or school made "Adequate Yearly Progress" (AYP). AYP indicates satisfactory progress by a district or a school toward the goal of proficiency for all students. In ELA, mathematics, and science, AYP is determined by comparing the percentage of students tested and the performance of tested students against defined standards. In graduation rate, AYP is determined by comparing the percentage of students graduating against defined standards.

Standards for English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science
Participation: In ELA and mathematics, 95% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested to meet the participation criterion. In science, 80% must be tested. Performance: In ELA and mathematics, a calculated measure of performance called the "Performance Index" (PI) for each accountability group with 30 or more members must equal or exceed a preset objective called an "Effective Annual Measurable Objective" (EAMO) or a safety net objective called a "Safe Harbor Target." In science, the criterion for performance is the same but the safety net is referred to as a "Progress Target." Districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria for all groups with sufficient numbers to make AYP.

Standards for Graduation Rate
Districts and schools with secondary-level grades are also held to certain standards for the percentage of students who graduated. To make AYP in graduation rate, every accountability group with 30 or more members must make AYP. For a group to make AYP, the graduation rate of the 4-year graduation-rate total cohort or the 5-year graduation-rate total cohort must equal or exceed the Graduation-Rate Standard of 80% or the group's Progress Target. A cohort is a group of students who entered grade 9 anywhere in a particular school year. Graduation rates for these cohorts are then determined 4 and 5 years after the students first enter grade 9. For more information on how AYP and PIs are determined, see "Determining AYP in 2011-12" under Understanding Accountability in New York State at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/.

April 25, 2013

2

Elementary/Middle-Level ELA: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: In elementary/middle-level (grades 3 - 8) English language arts (ELA), districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Participation: To meet the participation criterion, at least 95% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested on an appropriate ELA assessment. Performance: To meet the performance criterion, the Performance Index (PI) of students in each accountability group with 30 or more members must be equal to or greater than the Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO) or the Safe Harbor Target.

All accountability groups met the participation and performance criteria (made AYP): YES
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

3

Elementary/Middle-Level ELA: Participation
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 40 or more members tested at least 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period: YES
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 3 - 8) English Language Arts (ELA) Participation Results
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Tested 95% ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ Students Enrolled During Enrolled Students Percent of Enrolled the Test Administration with Valid Test Students with Valid Period Scores Test Scores 2198 12 236 393 35 1515 7 417 20 804 2196 ― 236 393 ― 1513 ― 417 ― 803 100% ― 100% 100% ― 100% ― 100% ― 100%

✔ At least 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ✘ Less than 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period. Medically Excused: Students who were excused from testing for medical reasons in accordance with federal No Child Left Behind guidance are not included in these calculations.

April 25, 2013

4

Elementary/Middle-Level ELA: Performance
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members had a PI greater than or equal to the EAMO or Safe Harbor Target: YES
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 3 - 8) English Language Arts (ELA) Performance Results
Performance at Levels PI >= Tested EAMO Students Students Students Students Students or Scoring Scoring Students Students Enrolled Scoring Scoring Safe Level 1 Level 2 Scoring Scoring on BEDS Level 1 Level 2 Harbor NOT On NOT On Level 3 Level 4 Day On Track On Track Target Track Track ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ 2139 12 230 370 35 1487 5 430✝ 13 759 0 ― 0 0 0 0 ― 0✝ ― 0 138 ― 19 33 2 81 ― 114✝ ― 87 52 ― 5 9 0 38 ― 17✝ ― 21 644 ― 88 122 7 419 ― 197✝ ― 302 1224 ― 116 196 24 882 ― 88✝ ― 334 81 ― 2 10 2 67 ― 14✝ ― 15 Objectives PI Safe EAMO Harbor Target 148 ― 123 126 149 161 ― 96 ― 130 148 ― 123 126 149 161 ― 96 ― 130

Student Group

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

157 ― 145 149 169 161 ― 101✝ ― 137

✔ Performance Index is equal to or greater than Effective Annual Measurable Objective. ✘ Performance Index is less than Effective Annual Measurable Objective and Safe Harbor Target. ― There were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. BEDS Day (Basic Educational Data System Day): BEDS Day is the first Wednesday in October of the school year. On/Off Track Performance: Students who score at Level 1 or 2 and are on track to proficiency are those who have shown significant growth over their performance the previous year. Those not on track to proficiency have not shown significant growth. Performance Index (PI): A PI is a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating how that group performed on a required State test (or approved alternative). Student scores on the tests are converted to six performance levels: Level 1 On Track, Level 1 Not On Track, Level 2 On Track, Level 2 Not On Track, Level 3, and Level 4. A PI is calculated using the levels and the following equation: ([2(Count at Level 1 On Track) + Count at Level 2 Not On Track + 2(Count at Level 2 On Track) + 2(Count at Level 3) + 2(Count at Level 4)] ÷ [Count of Tested Students]) × 100 Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO): The EAMO is the PI value that each accountability group of a given size within a district or school is expected to achieve to meet the performance criterion. The EAMO table is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/ under the header "Annual Measurable Objectives." Safe Harbor Target: Safe Harbor provides an alternate means to meet the performance criterion for accountability groups whose PIs are less than their EAMOs. The 2011-12 Safe Harbor Target is calculated using the following formula: 2010-11 PI + (200 - the 2010-11 PI) × 0.10.

April 25, 2013

5

Elementary/Middle-Level Math: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: In elementary/middle-level (grades 3 - 8) mathematics, districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Participation: To meet the participation criterion, at least 95% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested on an appropriate math assessment. Performance: To meet the performance criterion, the Performance Index (PI) of students in each accountability group with 30 or more members must be equal to or greater than the Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO) or the Safe Harbor Target.

All accountability groups met the participation and performance criteria (made AYP): NO
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

6

Elementary/Middle-Level Math: Participation
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 40 or more members tested at least 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period: YES
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 3 - 8) Math Participation Results
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Tested 95% ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ Students Enrolled During Enrolled Students Percent of Enrolled the Test Administration with Valid Test Students with Valid Period Scores Test Scores 2198 12 235 393 35 1516 7 418 20 804 2191 ― 235 393 ― 1509 ― 413 ― 798 100% ― 100% 100% ― 100% ― 99% ― 99%

✔ At least 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ✘ Less than 95% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period. Medically Excused: Students who were excused from testing for medical reasons in accordance with federal No Child Left Behind guidance are not included in these calculations.

April 25, 2013

7

Elementary/Middle-Level Math: Performance
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members had a PI greater than or equal to the EAMO or Safe Harbor Target: NO
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 3 - 8) Math Performance Results
Performance at Levels PI >= Tested EAMO Students Students Students Students Students or Scoring Scoring Students Students Enrolled Scoring Scoring Safe Level 1 Level 2 Scoring Scoring on BEDS Level 1 Level 2 Harbor NOT On NOT On Level 3 Level 4 Day On Track On Track Target Track Track ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ― ✔ ― ✔ 2135 12 230 370 35 1483 5 426✝ 13 755 0 ― 0 0 0 0 ― 0✝ ― 0 90 ― 14 13 1 60 ― 71✝ ― 55 29 ― 6 8 1 14 ― 17✝ ― 13 577 ― 87 126 7 350 ― 186✝ ― 267 972 ― 93 163 11 700 ― 118✝ ― 320 467 ― 30 60 15 359 ― 34✝ ― 100 Objectives PI Safe EAMO Harbor Target 162 ― 135 144 169 171 ― 117 ― 147 162 ― 135 144 169 171 ― 117 ― 147

Student Group

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

165 ― 150 159 174 168 ― 123✝ ― 150

✔ Performance Index is equal to or greater than Effective Annual Measurable Objective. ✘ Performance Index is less than Effective Annual Measurable Objective and Safe Harbor Target. ― There were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. BEDS Day (Basic Educational Data System Day): BEDS Day is the first Wednesday in October of the school year. On/Off Track Performance: Students who score at Level 1 or 2 and are on track to proficiency are those who have shown significant growth over their performance the previous year. Those not on track to proficiency have not shown significant growth. Performance Index (PI): A PI is a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating how that group performed on a required State test (or approved alternative). Student scores on the tests are converted to six performance levels: Level 1 On Track, Level 1 Not On Track, Level 2 On Track, Level 2 Not On Track, Level 3, and Level 4. A PI is calculated using the levels and the following equation: ([2(Count at Level 1 On Track) + Count at Level 2 Not On Track + 2(Count at Level 2 On Track) + 2(Count at Level 3) + 2(Count at Level 4)] ÷ [Count of Tested Students]) × 100 Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO): The EAMO is the PI value that each accountability group of a given size within a district or school is expected to achieve to meet the performance criterion. The EAMO table is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/ under the header "Annual Measurable Objectives." Safe Harbor Target: Safe Harbor provides an alternate means to meet the performance criterion for accountability groups whose PIs are less than their EAMOs. The 2011-12 Safe Harbor Target is calculated using the following formula: 2010-11 PI + (200 - the 2010-11 PI) × 0.10.

April 25, 2013

8

Elementary/Middle-Level Science: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: In elementary/middle-level (grades 4 & 8) science, districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Participation: To meet the participation criterion, at least 80% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested on an appropriate science assessment. Performance: To meet the performance criterion, the Performance Index (PI) of students in each accountability group with 30 or more members must be equal to or greater than the Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO) or the Progress Target.

All accountability groups met the participation and performance criteria (made AYP): YES
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

9

Elementary/Middle-Level Science: Participation
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 40 or more members tested at least 80% of students enrolled during the test administration period: YES
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 4 & 8) Science Participation Results
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Tested 80% ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period 733 7 81 128 14 501 2 134 8 254 Enrolled Percent of Enrolled Students with Students with Valid Test Scores Valid Test Scores 728 ― 81 126 ― 498 ― 133 ― 251 99% ― 100% 98% ― 99% ― 99% ― 99%

✔ At least 80% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ✘ Less than 80% of students enrolled during the test administration period were tested. ― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period. Medically Excused: Students who were excused from testing for medical reasons in accordance with federal No Child Left Behind guidance are not included in these calculations.

April 25, 2013

10

Elementary/Middle-Level Science: Performance
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members had a PI greater than or equal to the EAMO or Progress Target: YES
Elementary/Middle-Level (Grades 4 & 8) Science Performance Results
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day 709 7 79 120 14 487 2 138✝ 6 238 Performance at Levels Students Scoring Level 1 9 ― 1 3 ― 5 ― 9✝ ― 5 Students Scoring Level 2 53 ― 13 11 ― 25 ― 27✝ ― 30 Students Scoring Level 3 246 ― 30 48 ― 163 ― 47✝ ― 98 Students Scoring Level 4 401 ― 35 58 ― 294 ― 55✝ ― 105 PI Objectives EAMO 175 ― 150 156 ― 186 ― 145 ― 161 Progress Target 175 ― 150 156 ― 186 ― 145 ― 161

Student Group

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

190 ― 181 186 ― 193 ― 167✝ ― 183

✔ Performance Index is equal to or greater than Effective Annual Measurable Objective. ✘ Performance Index is less than Effective Annual Measurable Objective and Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. BEDS Day (Basic Educational Data System Day): BEDS Day is the first Wednesday in October of the school year. On/Off Track Performance: Students who score at Level 1 or 2 and are on track to proficiency are those who have shown significant growth over their performance the previous year. Those not on track to proficiency have not shown significant growth. Performance Index (PI): A PI is a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating how that group performed on a required State test (or approved alternative). Student scores on the tests are converted to four performance levels, from Level 1 to Level 4. A PI is calculated using the levels and the following equation: ([(Count at Level 2) + 2(Count at Level 3) + 2(Count at Level 4)] ÷ [Count of Tested Students]) × 100 Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO): The EAMO is the PI value that each accountability group of a given size within a district or school is expected to achieve to meet the performance criterion. The EAMO table is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/ under the header "Annual Measurable Objectives." Progress Target: A Progress Target provides an alternate means to meet the performance criterion for accountability groups whose PIs are less than their EAMOs. The 2011-12 Progress Target is calculated by adding 1 point to the previous year's PI.

April 25, 2013

11

Secondary-Level ELA: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: In secondary-level English language arts (ELA), districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Participation: To meet the participation criterion, at least 95% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested on an appropriate ELA assessment. Performance: To meet the performance criterion, the Performance Index (PI) of students in each accountability group with 30 or more members must be equal to or greater than the Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO) or the Safe Harbor Target.

All accountability groups met the participation and performance criteria (made AYP): NO
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✘ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

12

Secondary-Level ELA: Participation
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 40 or more members tested at least 95% of 12th graders: YES
Secondary-Level English Language Arts (ELA) Participation Results
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Tested 95% 12th Graders ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ― ― ✔ 347 1 43 44 5 254 0 38 0 84 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores 347 ― 43 44 ― 254 ― ― ― 84 Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores 100% ― 100% 100% ― 100% ― ― ― 100%

✔ At least 95% of 12th graders were tested. ✘ Less than 95% of 12th graders were tested. ― There were fewer than 40 12th graders in the group.

April 25, 2013

13

Secondary-Level ELA: Performance
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members had a PI greater than or equal to the EAMO or Safe Harbor Target: NO
Secondary-Level English Language Arts (ELA) Performance Results
Student Group PI >= Performance at Levels EAMO 2008 Students Students Students Students or Accountability Scoring at Scoring at Scoring at Scoring at Safe Cohort Accountability Accountability Accountability Accountability Harbor Members Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Target ✔ ― 358 1 13 ― 95 ― 195 ― 55 ― Objectives PI Safe EAMO Harbor Target 153 ― 153 ―

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

166 ―

✔ ✔ ― ✘ ― ✔ ― ✔

42 44 5 266 0 51✝ 0 84

0 2 ― 11 ― 8✝ ― 5

15 11 ― 68 ― 29✝ ― 30

23 26 ― 142 ― 13✝ ― 45

4 5 ― 45 ― 1✝ ― 4

164 166 ― 166 ― 112✝ ― 152

119 122 ― 167 ― 84 ― 130

119 122 ― 167 ― 84 ― 130

✔ Performance Index is equal to or greater than Effective Annual Measurable Objective. ✘ Performance Index is less than Effective Annual Measurable Objective and Safe Harbor Target. ― There were fewer than 30 tested students in the 2008 accountability cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. 2008 Accountability Cohort: The 2008 Accountability Cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday during the 2008-09 school year. Results for these students are captured as of June 30, 2012. A more detailed definition of this cohort is available in "Secondary-Level Cohort Definitions" at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/sirs/. Performance Index (PI): A PI is a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating how that group performed on a required State test (or approved alternative). Student scores on the tests are converted to four performance levels, from Level 1 to Level 4. A PI is calculated using the levels and the following equation: ([(Count at Level 2) + 2(Count at Level 3) + 2(Count at Level 4)] ÷ [Count of Cohort Members]) × 100 Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO): The EAMO is the PI value that each accountability group of a given size within a district or school is expected to achieve to meet the performance criterion. The EAMO table is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/ under the header "Annual Measurable Objectives." Safe Harbor Target: Safe Harbor provides an alternate means to meet the performance criterion for accountability groups whose PIs are less than their EAMOs. The 2011-12 Safe Harbor Target is calculated using the following formula: 2010-11 PI + (200 - the 2010-11 PI) × 0.10

April 25, 2013

14

Secondary-Level Math: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: In secondary-level mathematics, districts and schools must meet both the participation and performance criteria to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Participation: To meet the participation criterion, at least 95% of students in each accountability group with 40 or more members must be tested on an appropriate math assessment. Performance: To meet the performance criterion, the Performance Index (PI) of students in each accountability group with 30 or more members must be equal to or greater than the Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO) or the Safe Harbor Target.

All accountability groups met the participation and performance criteria (made AYP): YES
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

15

Secondary-Level Math: Participation
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 40 or more members tested at least 95% of 12th graders: YES
Secondary-Level Math Participation Results
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged Tested 95% 12th Graders ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ― ― ✔ 347 1 43 44 5 254 0 38 0 84 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores 347 ― 43 44 ― 254 ― ― ― 84 Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores 100% ― 100% 100% ― 100% ― ― ― 100%

✔ At least 95% of 12th graders were tested. ✘ Less than 95% of 12th graders were tested. ― There were fewer than 40 12th graders in the group.

April 25, 2013

16

Secondary-Level Math: Performance
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members had a PI greater than or equal to the EAMO or Safe Harbor Target: YES
Secondary-Level Math Performance Results
Student Group PI >= Performance at Levels EAMO 2008 Students Students Students Students or Accountability Scoring at Scoring at Scoring at Scoring at Safe Cohort Accountability Accountability Accountability Accountability Harbor Members Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Target ✔ ― 358 1 15 ― 168 ― 126 ― 49 ― Objectives PI Safe EAMO Harbor Target 130 ― 130 ―

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

145 ―

✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔

42 44 5 266 0 51✝ 0 84

2 2 ― 11 ― 12✝ ― 5

29 23 ― 114 ― 33✝ ― 52

10 17 ― 96 ― 3✝ ― 24

1 2 ― 45 ― 3✝ ― 3

121 139 ― 149 ― 88✝ ― 126

88 93 ― 147 ― 69 ― 104

88 93 ― 147 ― 69 ― 104

✔ Performance Index is equal to or greater than Effective Annual Measurable Objective. ✘ Performance Index is less than Effective Annual Measurable Objective and Safe Harbor Target. ― There were fewer than 30 tested students in the 2008 accountability cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. 2008 Accountability Cohort: The 2008 Accountability Cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday during the 2008-09 school year. Results for these students are captured as of June 30, 2012. A more detailed definition of this cohort is available in "Secondary-Level Cohort Definitions" at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/sirs/. Performance Index (PI): A PI is a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating how that group performed on a required State test (or approved alternative). Student scores on the tests are converted to four performance levels, from Level 1 to Level 4. A PI is calculated using the levels and the following equation: ([(Count at Level 2) + 2(Count at Level 3) + 2(Count at Level 4)] ÷ [Count of Cohort Members]) × 100 Effective Annual Measurable Objective (EAMO): The EAMO is the PI value that each accountability group of a given size within a district or school is expected to achieve to meet the performance criterion. The EAMO table is available at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/ under the header "Annual Measurable Objectives." Safe Harbor Target: Safe Harbor provides an alternate means to meet the performance criterion for accountability groups whose PIs are less than their EAMOs. The 2011-12 Safe Harbor Target is calculated using the following formula: 2010-11 PI + (200 - the 2010-11 PI) × 0.10

April 25, 2013

17

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math Performance Indices (PIs)
The unweighted combined ELA and math Performance Index (PI) is the sum of the PIs for all measures for which the school/district has 30 or more students in the group divided by the number of measures for which the school/district has 30 or more students in the group. For example, EM ELA = 150, EM Math = 180, HS ELA = 140, HS Math = 160: (150 + 180 + 140 + 160) ÷ 4 = 157.5 = 158. Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI 157 ― 145 149 169 161 ― 101 ― 137 Elementary/ Middle-Level Math PI 165 ― 150 159 174 168 ― 123 ― 150 Secondary-Level ELA PI 166 ― 164 166 ― 166 ― 112 ― 152 Secondary-Level Math PI 145 ― 121 139 ― 149 ― 88 ― 126 Unweighted Combined PI 158 ― 145 153 172 161 ― 106 ― 141

Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

― There was not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

April 25, 2013

18

Graduation Rate: AYP
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000 Adequate Yearly Progress: To make AYP in graduation rate, every accountability group with 30 or more members must make AYP. For a group to make AYP, the graduation rate of the 4-year graduation-rate total cohort OR the 5-year graduation-rate total cohort must equal or exceed the Graduation-Rate Standard of 80% or the group's Progress Target.

All accountability groups made AYP: YES
Student Group All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged ✔ Made AYP ✘ Did not make AYP ― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination Made AYP ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔

April 25, 2013

19

Graduation Rate: 4-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members met the graduation-rate criterion for the four-year graduation-rate total cohort: NO
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 FourMet Year GraduationNumber of Graduation State Progress GraduationRate Graduates Rate Standard Target Rate Total Criterion Cohort ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✘ ― ✘ 430 1 39 77 5 307 1 65✝ 3 102 361 ― 32 67 ― 257 ― 39✝ ― 77 84% ― 82% 87% ― 84% ― 60%✝ ― 75% 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% ― 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% ― 67% ― 80%

Student Group

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. ✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. 2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort The 2007 four-year graduation-rate total cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008. Four-year graduation-rate results for these students are captured as of August 31, 2011. Graduation Rate The graduate rate for the 2007 four-year graduation-rate total cohort is the percentage of cohort members who earned a local or Regents diploma by August 31, 2011. Progress Target The Progress Target for the 2007 four-year graduation-rate total cohort is a 10% gap reduction in the graduation rate of the 2006 four-year graduation-rate total cohort as of August 31, 2010. The following equation is used to determine the 2007 four-year graduation-rate total cohort progress target: [(80 - the graduation rate of the 2006 four-year graduation-rate total cohort) x 0.1] + the graduation rate of the 2006 four-year graduation-rate total cohort

April 25, 2013

20

Graduation Rate: 5-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
DISTRICT: VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (MONTGOMERY) DISTRICT ID: 441301060000

All accountability groups with 30 or more members met the graduation-rate criterion for the five-year graduation-rate total cohort: YES
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2006 FiveMet Year GraduationNumber of Graduation State Progress GraduationRate Graduates Rate Standard Target Rate Total Criterion Cohort ✔ ― ✔ ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ ― ✔ 409 0 46 55 6 302 0 52✝ 0 95 357 ― 38 49 ― 264 ― 36✝ ― 80 87% ― 83% 89% ― 87% ― 69%✝ ― 84% 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% ― 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% 80% ― 80% ― 69% ― 80%

Student Group

All Students American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander White Multiracial Students With Disabilities Limited English Proficient Economically Disadvantaged

✔ Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. ✘ Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. 2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort The 2006 five-year graduation-rate total cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007. Five-year graduation-rate results for these students are captured as of August 31, 2011. Graduation Rate The graduate rate for the 2006 five-year graduation-rate total cohort is the percentage of cohort members who earned a local or Regents diploma by August 31, 2011. Progress Target The Progress Target for the 2006 five-year graduation-rate total cohort is a 20% gap reduction in the graduation rate of the 2005 five-year graduation-rate total cohort as of June 30, 2010. The following equation is used to determine the 2006 five-year graduation-rate total cohort progress target: [(80 - the graduation rate of the 2005 five-year graduation-rate total cohort) x 0.2] + the graduation rate of the 2005 five-year graduation-rate total cohort

April 25, 2013

21

Valley Central School District 2012-2013 Property Tax Report Card

Valley Central School District 2013-2014 Administrative Compensation Disclosure

New York State Education Department State Aid Management System (SAMS)

Page

I of5

Salary: Administrative Compensation
441301 - VALLEY CSD

lnformation (MONTGOME

2012-2013 - Page

1

Revision - as of 041261201312:54PM

Submittal Form for Estimated Salaries in the Budget for the 201 3-2014 School Year (Form Due - May 13,2013) Sections 1608 and 1716 ofthe Education Law (Please read the instructions and definitions before completing this form.)

Title

Salary

Employee

Benefits Other
Remuneration

1.

rintendent of Schools

Wl4sr-----l F32o+-------l tt,r58---------l
Business, etc.)

Associate, Assistant and Deputy Superintendents (Example Titles: Associate Superintendent for lnstruction, Deputy Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent for

2.
3.

DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL
DRINCIPAL

178,441 146,880 135,000
1

*-----l
l41,116

796

F4186------l
42,000 48,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 43,000 36,000

4. 5. 6. 7.
8.

ttooo

59,346

------__-.' Fsoo

------l

143.731

9.
'10.

)RINCIPAL

-_l Itr2r5 ------1
Ffigs
FnA;-------1
Fnno-------1
133,221

141 ,480

ilaoo-------l bsoo ---l
1,600
2

900

f IRECTOR
)IRECTOR )IRECTOR ]IRECTOR
\SSISTANT PRINCIPAL \SSISTANT PRINCIPAL

2,800 2,800

11.
12.

36,000 36,000 36,000
30,000 29,000

2,800 2,800 2,800 2.700

13.

ttu6,rt-----l
128,715

14.
15. 16. 17.
18. 19.

20.
21.

22.

23.
24.

25. 26.
27.

28. 29.
30. 31.

32.
33.

34.
35. 36.

httos:l/eservices.nvsed.sov/sams/nrintForm.do?mefhod:nrintForm&fsTd:R76&seomentKerz:l ?66QQ{?R? t.D6/)fi1't'

Valley Central School District 2011-2012 Exempt Property Report

3 o

q6
3tr io LO

r
Oo

c

I I X9 o q,

{ { 5500
o

al
tr

I a =0, E;
o mo
=. o

55S5 @@@! ('r(roN

g$ oJ
€o 6'o Jo
(')

oz o< c,a

:.;

o

q

s
0,

i:
@m!>
(D5

'<! oo +4, !r (,)i
6:

E; ;s
tto m x o oU' =f

'o

=.
q, E

tt c
.o
6CL

oo ?5 :'o id€ OL

= N o

: ds f,o o=
ai.
@,6>=
:l-

>zma 0,-nn o4Ro

zfn ox

3E s 6'

e e 3 J

f o
o o

!0,
o

o
tr 9. (o =

o o +

iH;; E;TF
9nUis X ou) 6 n1
o 64 (.1 < m-l
n

r m
o ltl z
-{

3

c
o =
3

3 o o 5' o c o

n

-

! o
o o
(o
ql

0,

x o
o

o o

g
c
!D

{
o
m

x o

s sr (,(,r{(,
T'

nv v > TI I Q FFFi
o
o

9S

>v,

a
r(t O (Jr

f

iq

E
m .o

c

g

!'3 Xo
S
q, = o CL o 5 o
A'

;
o
d o
q)

o

e.3 :rm-'

rnie9 -' ,^'

0) (o

!

o

fi
o o o 3 o

oooo o -:rE

FE3
mx= OL 33
5A (00(o

o

o f o, cLi.5N !3=o (,'J N t,

F
(,

"
SF
@(tr(t

E;. gT

J
A<t,/ '(t'

{
g;
* o ;
q,

de'
cDr .Olt
5

d I JO

E#
= o
o 5' o o
0,

o

{
x o
o o t o o

N o N a
!t A'
o o
3

ogl * mF x+ 9E EB

6'a

9
F

-{

-E -E {{o.rcl)co= $ot

BE=,q ;= a-AE; O)('(Jlr

!L

o o o o o

SE b=' o
.!
mB xo o=
-lO{ iobiD 50$

8g
o

ir
FE
eo Np (o5(ro=

9'
5A(,56

:+

J'-<
8f

E6= -f b
AJO

o\ o6P

5-lr

o

3 o
q
tr
66O!AO

g
o an t,
r1OJ

{ <o i u, I o o
U)

s 5 s 5
(r (, o 1\) 5 5 o o
o

c f F

a, t *0) i 6 g;

o
(,)

mo

c)m ox ;-= "€ f, o

o,

= :<

tE: g o
cr

g
s

o o' :.

(,1C) z O= e . oo.< = ! oa6 ii

=:

;
€

cLU) + o

t, o

6E !o m x o oo =,f,

orc= |>;-v 4€ HF :l NZ

;i.

o o o o 3. o o

A'

I g
N

.ct

: is =o o=
urmrr> >zma

s o
o cl o
= 9.
GI

de. @,6>= * 5

3ta4"
t-

zm gX dE
N o

ta

=6 Xo

o

r m
o m z { n r

o
=

E'

-

iHfri S;TF
grUio N od E ?i YO mn

o
C

o t, 3 o f o

ii

= o
c
o
q,

o

t o
5 o o
(ct

x o o
f !,

o o

ET

c

!e

>o c5' n T J r s

o
m

x o It
3 t, J o
J

uEq;ro o o o
0,

a T ) r s

n ! J r s

> c) r S. X
(,

--

O=
=.o €e
m lt tr

o (,l

A,

il 6v,

cL8

d E
fi
F

fiq
o =' o

G) (o

!

o

on4* cL F
o o
2.
CL

9x3 a:E
$=
o
A'

Yo, :+:'N

o

N l€ !roT

* o
!0t
-=

55 (oo(0

(,

EF,
@(rJctr (,,|+

=l

.i 3Fi
-b
g;
3 o
f grEl Ot @

3s

or=

'Yt

o

o
5'

o
tr

{ o
o
q,

g
mEl

x o
o o

NN o
o o

ct)

-g
Jo

s*
!t t
3 o

3 ;foo _(t {\t (t {o{ (' -o -5 -o) -oo O(rO)-.lO (r(ro)o O)(,rOrJ=
o

x: Eb !N ao ocL
eO 50r

o>
10 =o

o

!

;8 aDo;PV e 69Ll =q roc: (Do6 iz >!
!r=

mF xo OJ 2=o

:{o{ iobio 505 Pi$9P

8iE8

8.S F
6

,., fisE o--ib
boF-o {A{J

-o-(

9NS o\