Would You Like a Past Life Psychic Reading?
Content
==== ==== California Psychic Readings 877-345-6998 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9DJMRgz6UY ==== ====
I had the chance to interview Stephan Schwartz, who has been pioneering "psychic archaeology," where physics 'sense' the location of an ancient site by drawing circles on the map. One of his projects was in Egypt where they found Cleopatra's palace and Mark Anthony's Palacethe Timonium and the Light House of Pharaohs, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. He shows me pictures, where they are busy discovering the edge of the ship. They used electronic remote sensing equipment like side-scan sonars or proton precision magnetometers and ground penetrating radars. Schwartz: "I always want to see: could you have found this using electronic sources? Because one of the criticisms is that: Well anybody could've found it. I use multiple remote viewers, I get the information before we go to the site, I get additional information before we are at the site. Some of this info is turned over to a third party before any actual field work is done. Then we dig and then we have independent experts evaluate the accuracy of what the viewers gave us compared to what was actually found." Schwartz enthusiastically showed me pictures on his computer: "Now here's an example - we had a very skeptical archaeological department from the university of Alexandria and they said 'Well we're not going to cooperate with you unless you can find something and we can control it all the way through.' And so they wanted to find a buried building in a buried city that had a tiled floor.And so we went with two psychics into the desert looking for this one spot. So here's George McMullen - a psychic, and I, and we're out in the middle of the desert. Where would you look? And we have to search about 1500 square kilometres. Well after a while we had George make a location and then we had Hella Hamid (another psychic) do the same thing. Then we bring George back in and we literally say to him-'now put a stake in the ground at the corners of the building.' Now think about that, you can't be more than a few inches off. So then we dug down and there you see the walls beginning to emerge." I asked him why aren't more people doing the kind of archaeological research that he has been doing? Schwartz: "I think probably underlying it all is, that the whole premise which says that there is an aspect of consciousness which is independent of time space- is simply too much for some people to take aboard and they go into a kind of reality vertigo. I don't think for a moment that this is new or previously unknown; I think that much of this
particularly from Buddhism and Hinduism has been known for thousands of years." SCIENCE FICTION? Stephan talked about Jules Verne, father of science fiction, who was an inspiring French writer. He envisioned in 1863 space flight and trips to the moon, guided missiles, skyscrapers of glass and steel, global communications networks, and submarines carrying hundreds of men miles below the surface of the sea. He predicted with startling accuracy all of these inventions, and the things that would be accomplished by them, long before they became reality. Some believe that many of these insights were self-fulfilling. This may very well be the case. Schwartz then told me how over the past years he has asked about 4000 people to remote view the year 2050. This is what they found according to Schwartz: People will live in small communities; People will travel in virtual reality. Will it be safer? No there will be small wars, and terrorism will still be there. We now think that because of overpopulation there will be a shortage of resources, but they 'saw' that under-population will be the problem. The pharmaceutical industry will disappear. Chronic illnesses will be identified before birth. We will communicate through devices that are implanted in our bodies. There will be no more money being used. There will be an energy revolution, and huge mass migrations of people. Global warming will be very clear 15 years from now. Water will be a huge issue. And we will all carry a small box with us. (RS: maybe a solar battery?) A REMOTE VIEWER Remote viewing has gone from being an obscure laboratory protocol to a social movement with its newsletters, conferences and variety of techniques. It has become a vocational interest for hundreds of thousands of people in the US. Paul Smith, a teacher and Chief Coordinator for the CIA spy program in the 90's, actually conducts real remote viewing sessions. There are a variety of people all teaching different techniques. There are rules in RV to ensure the information one is obtaining could not be accessible to the psychic through any other means. These rules, taken as a set, are called "the Protocol".The protocol does not affect one being psychic; it doesn't have much to do with the psychic process itself. Rather, it affects the situation one is being psychic within. Paul Smith was taught by Ingo Swann, who compiled a set of methods in the 1980s. I had to pick up him up at his home in a suburb of Austin (Texas) and we drove to a conference room in a hotel where he usually holds his RV sessions. Paul Smith: " I was an army Intelligence officer working at the Middle East desk. Actually I was a
mild sceptic of ESP, but they approached me and said "Hey we think you'd be good at this thing." I said well what is it? And they were secretive and said they could not tell me until they had tested me. So they gave me some tests and then they told me that they were collecting intelligence against the enemy using a psychic skill known as Remote Viewing, and they said: "We want you to be a psychic spy." And I said- 'WHAT? That's just amazing. Are you crazy?' Obviously this looked like it would be pretty fun. A lot more fun than what I was doing at the time, so I said: 'okay I'll try it, what the heck'. So I spent 7 years in their military program. And we were used to spy on the Soviet Union; to spy on the Chinese, the Hezbolah; Narco traffickers in the Caribbeanwhatever or whoever they thought to be a threat at the time." I did a simple test with Smith. A week before we met, I had visited the Balboa Park in San Diego, and filmed around the area, and in particular the Apollo space shuttle in the Aerospace Museum. I left the tape with the footage in an adjacent room in the hotel. I asked Smith if he could 'see' the video footage on the film. Smith prides himself on best preserving the methodology. He meditated first before he began the session. Smith: "First I will describe the basic sensory impressions: its red, its spongy, its shiny, its rounded, hollow, or airy." He told me he teaches remote viewing because there is a demand for it, and as a way of making some income for his family. He added, "But more to the point I think remote viewing tells us a lot about human nature." For proper remote viewing you need a monitor. So Paul has asked one of his pupils to help him focus and prevent him from thinking or analyzing too much. This is because the left brain does all the analysis, but a remote viewer needs to shut the left brain down, so somebody (the monitor) has got to perform the adult functions so to speak. I asked him, "So you're not supposed to think too much?" Smith: "Exactly, in fact the more you think, the more trouble you get into. Remote viewing is easy to learn but it takes a lot of work to get good at it. I would say that I am on target significantly more often than I am off. I usually say roughly 70% of the time I am correct." Smith explained how you have to first write down your name and date on a piece of paper: "Remote viewing crosses space and time boundaries so we have to lock in where you are at so that your subconscious mind knows where you are starting." After three minutes of meditation, Paul started the remote viewing session. Could he 'see' what is on my video tape? Smith said: "Southern California setting, I see educational corners, remind me of having kids at a pool. Motor speedway, fascinating California coast." Indeed now that I think of it: The Balboa Park is next to the highway. There is a pond.
Paul seemed to describe the whole area, and not just the aerospace museum I had visited. There is an education centre. This was quite incredible. Smith continued: "Brown, black, metallic... I like this place- I would like to go there myself. People here are thrilled- It reminds me of a state fair or something like that....Break... "A space capsule". The session ended after about half an hour. How many words are there in the English dictionary? 171.476. So the chances are 1 to 171.476 that Paul would mention the word: "space capsule." Or was he reading my mind? Although that would be quite a miracle in itself. I left a brochure of the San Diego Air Space Museum in my hotel room, and brought it to him. Smith: "That's exactly what I sketched! Did I sketch that? And the space capsule right here. I had this impression of this tapering space capsule just like the Apollo. That's good! I'm impressed with that." I asked him if he is not actually reading my mind? Smith:" I don't think so, but who knows? There's no way of knowing. Maybe we just all gain information from the same source or we just trade the information back and forth." I soon learned that mind reading or telepathy does not typically happen between strangers.
Renée Scheltema is a Dutch documentary filmmaker and photographer. For 25 years Renée has worked for Dutch television as a director, producer and camera person. Her latest work is called, Something Unknown, a documentary film about psychic phenomena.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Renee_Scheltema
I had the chance to interview Stephan Schwartz, who has been pioneering "psychic archaeology," where physics 'sense' the location of an ancient site by drawing circles on the map. One of his projects was in Egypt where they found Cleopatra's palace and Mark Anthony's Palacethe Timonium and the Light House of Pharaohs, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. He shows me pictures, where they are busy discovering the edge of the ship. They used electronic remote sensing equipment like side-scan sonars or proton precision magnetometers and ground penetrating radars. Schwartz: "I always want to see: could you have found this using electronic sources? Because one of the criticisms is that: Well anybody could've found it. I use multiple remote viewers, I get the information before we go to the site, I get additional information before we are at the site. Some of this info is turned over to a third party before any actual field work is done. Then we dig and then we have independent experts evaluate the accuracy of what the viewers gave us compared to what was actually found." Schwartz enthusiastically showed me pictures on his computer: "Now here's an example - we had a very skeptical archaeological department from the university of Alexandria and they said 'Well we're not going to cooperate with you unless you can find something and we can control it all the way through.' And so they wanted to find a buried building in a buried city that had a tiled floor.And so we went with two psychics into the desert looking for this one spot. So here's George McMullen - a psychic, and I, and we're out in the middle of the desert. Where would you look? And we have to search about 1500 square kilometres. Well after a while we had George make a location and then we had Hella Hamid (another psychic) do the same thing. Then we bring George back in and we literally say to him-'now put a stake in the ground at the corners of the building.' Now think about that, you can't be more than a few inches off. So then we dug down and there you see the walls beginning to emerge." I asked him why aren't more people doing the kind of archaeological research that he has been doing? Schwartz: "I think probably underlying it all is, that the whole premise which says that there is an aspect of consciousness which is independent of time space- is simply too much for some people to take aboard and they go into a kind of reality vertigo. I don't think for a moment that this is new or previously unknown; I think that much of this
particularly from Buddhism and Hinduism has been known for thousands of years." SCIENCE FICTION? Stephan talked about Jules Verne, father of science fiction, who was an inspiring French writer. He envisioned in 1863 space flight and trips to the moon, guided missiles, skyscrapers of glass and steel, global communications networks, and submarines carrying hundreds of men miles below the surface of the sea. He predicted with startling accuracy all of these inventions, and the things that would be accomplished by them, long before they became reality. Some believe that many of these insights were self-fulfilling. This may very well be the case. Schwartz then told me how over the past years he has asked about 4000 people to remote view the year 2050. This is what they found according to Schwartz: People will live in small communities; People will travel in virtual reality. Will it be safer? No there will be small wars, and terrorism will still be there. We now think that because of overpopulation there will be a shortage of resources, but they 'saw' that under-population will be the problem. The pharmaceutical industry will disappear. Chronic illnesses will be identified before birth. We will communicate through devices that are implanted in our bodies. There will be no more money being used. There will be an energy revolution, and huge mass migrations of people. Global warming will be very clear 15 years from now. Water will be a huge issue. And we will all carry a small box with us. (RS: maybe a solar battery?) A REMOTE VIEWER Remote viewing has gone from being an obscure laboratory protocol to a social movement with its newsletters, conferences and variety of techniques. It has become a vocational interest for hundreds of thousands of people in the US. Paul Smith, a teacher and Chief Coordinator for the CIA spy program in the 90's, actually conducts real remote viewing sessions. There are a variety of people all teaching different techniques. There are rules in RV to ensure the information one is obtaining could not be accessible to the psychic through any other means. These rules, taken as a set, are called "the Protocol".The protocol does not affect one being psychic; it doesn't have much to do with the psychic process itself. Rather, it affects the situation one is being psychic within. Paul Smith was taught by Ingo Swann, who compiled a set of methods in the 1980s. I had to pick up him up at his home in a suburb of Austin (Texas) and we drove to a conference room in a hotel where he usually holds his RV sessions. Paul Smith: " I was an army Intelligence officer working at the Middle East desk. Actually I was a
mild sceptic of ESP, but they approached me and said "Hey we think you'd be good at this thing." I said well what is it? And they were secretive and said they could not tell me until they had tested me. So they gave me some tests and then they told me that they were collecting intelligence against the enemy using a psychic skill known as Remote Viewing, and they said: "We want you to be a psychic spy." And I said- 'WHAT? That's just amazing. Are you crazy?' Obviously this looked like it would be pretty fun. A lot more fun than what I was doing at the time, so I said: 'okay I'll try it, what the heck'. So I spent 7 years in their military program. And we were used to spy on the Soviet Union; to spy on the Chinese, the Hezbolah; Narco traffickers in the Caribbeanwhatever or whoever they thought to be a threat at the time." I did a simple test with Smith. A week before we met, I had visited the Balboa Park in San Diego, and filmed around the area, and in particular the Apollo space shuttle in the Aerospace Museum. I left the tape with the footage in an adjacent room in the hotel. I asked Smith if he could 'see' the video footage on the film. Smith prides himself on best preserving the methodology. He meditated first before he began the session. Smith: "First I will describe the basic sensory impressions: its red, its spongy, its shiny, its rounded, hollow, or airy." He told me he teaches remote viewing because there is a demand for it, and as a way of making some income for his family. He added, "But more to the point I think remote viewing tells us a lot about human nature." For proper remote viewing you need a monitor. So Paul has asked one of his pupils to help him focus and prevent him from thinking or analyzing too much. This is because the left brain does all the analysis, but a remote viewer needs to shut the left brain down, so somebody (the monitor) has got to perform the adult functions so to speak. I asked him, "So you're not supposed to think too much?" Smith: "Exactly, in fact the more you think, the more trouble you get into. Remote viewing is easy to learn but it takes a lot of work to get good at it. I would say that I am on target significantly more often than I am off. I usually say roughly 70% of the time I am correct." Smith explained how you have to first write down your name and date on a piece of paper: "Remote viewing crosses space and time boundaries so we have to lock in where you are at so that your subconscious mind knows where you are starting." After three minutes of meditation, Paul started the remote viewing session. Could he 'see' what is on my video tape? Smith said: "Southern California setting, I see educational corners, remind me of having kids at a pool. Motor speedway, fascinating California coast." Indeed now that I think of it: The Balboa Park is next to the highway. There is a pond.
Paul seemed to describe the whole area, and not just the aerospace museum I had visited. There is an education centre. This was quite incredible. Smith continued: "Brown, black, metallic... I like this place- I would like to go there myself. People here are thrilled- It reminds me of a state fair or something like that....Break... "A space capsule". The session ended after about half an hour. How many words are there in the English dictionary? 171.476. So the chances are 1 to 171.476 that Paul would mention the word: "space capsule." Or was he reading my mind? Although that would be quite a miracle in itself. I left a brochure of the San Diego Air Space Museum in my hotel room, and brought it to him. Smith: "That's exactly what I sketched! Did I sketch that? And the space capsule right here. I had this impression of this tapering space capsule just like the Apollo. That's good! I'm impressed with that." I asked him if he is not actually reading my mind? Smith:" I don't think so, but who knows? There's no way of knowing. Maybe we just all gain information from the same source or we just trade the information back and forth." I soon learned that mind reading or telepathy does not typically happen between strangers.
Renée Scheltema is a Dutch documentary filmmaker and photographer. For 25 years Renée has worked for Dutch television as a director, producer and camera person. Her latest work is called, Something Unknown, a documentary film about psychic phenomena.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Renee_Scheltema
