07-11-20 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Court file - "Volume IV-Continued" - evidence of Judicial Fraud on the Court and Racketeering s
The record herein is a copy of the Court file in the caption referenced above, as received from the Office of the Clerk on November 20, 2007. Page numbers and a footer were added to the record for ease of reference.In October 2007, after almost two years of the pretense litigation, during which Defendant and his counsel were denied notice and service of court minutes, orders, and judgments, and also denied access to the paper Court file, Defendant filed and appeared in Ex Parte Application before Supervising Judge GERALD ROSENBERG for access to the paper and electronic court files – to inspect and to copy. Judge ROSENBERG conducted the proceeding in a dark courtroom, behind closed doors. During the proceeding he informed Defendant that the court file included at that time six volumes, and he eventually agreed to permit Defendant access to three of the volumes. Access to the electronic court file in SUSTAIN – the court’s case management system - was denied under the false claim: “Sustain is privileged – for the Court only”. However, at the end of the proceeding, Supervising Judge Rosenberg demanded that Defendant withdraw the Ex Parte Application, which had already been filed with the Clerk of the Court. When Defendant refused, two armed Sheriff Deputies engaged in physical harassment of Defendant, in attempt to plant the paper on his body, in what Defendant at the time perceived as a life-threatening incident. The proceeding and its aftermath were also noted for the following:1) Judge ROSENBERG failed to create any record of the proceeding. 2) Judge ROSENBERG deceived Defendant regarding the number of court file volumes held by the Court at the time. The court file in fact held at the time seven volumes. One of them, “Volume IV Continued” was discovered only later. It was created out of any chronological order, and included various particularly incriminating records, including, but not limited to:a. Large volume of records filed by Countrywide Financial Corporation, which appeared in the case under the fraudulent party designation of “”Non Party”, while the Court interchangeably designated it in its records “Plaintiff”, “Defendant”, “Cross –Defendant”, “Intervenor”, “Real Parties in Interest”, and more, all with no legal foundation at all. b. Records pertaining to a pretense Summary Judgment proceeding conducted by Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR on August 9, 2007.3) Defendant consequently filed a complaint with Presiding Judge J STEPHEN CZULEGER regarding conduct of Supervising Judge ROSENBERG. Presiding Judge CZULEGER referred the complaint to Assistant Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY, who in turn referred it to Supervising Judge Rosenberg for review. Supervising Judge ROSENBERG found no basis for the complaint. Samaan v Zernik as a whole was alleged as pretense litigation, and part of a pattern of racketeering activity at the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Content
In October 2007, after almost two years of the pretense litigation, during which Defendant and his counsel were denied notice and service of court minutes, orders, and judgments, and also denied access to the paper Court file, Defendant filed and appeared in Ex Parte Application before Supervising Judge GERALD ROSENBERG for access to the paper and electronic court files – to inspect and to copy. Judge ROSENBERG conducted the proceeding in a dark courtroom, behind closed doors. During the proceeding he informed Defendant that the court file included at that time six volumes, and he eventually agreed to permit Defendant access to three of the volumes. Access to the electronic court file in SUSTAIN – the court’s case management system - was denied under the false claim:
“Sustain is privileged – for the Court only”.
However, at the end of the proceeding, Supervising Judge Rosenberg demanded that Defendant withdraw the Ex Parte Application, which had already been filed with the Clerk of the Court. When Defendant refused, two armed Sheriff Deputies engaged in physical harassment of Defendant, in attempt to plant the paper on his body, in what Defendant at the time perceived as a life-threatening incident.
The proceeding and its aftermath were also noted for the following:
1) Judge ROSENBERG failed to create any record of the proceeding.
2) Judge ROSENBERG deceived Defendant regarding the number of court file volumes held by the Court at the time. The court file in fact held at the time seven volumes. One of them, “Volume IV Continued” was discovered only later. It was created out of any chronological order, and included various particularly incriminating records, including, but not limited to:
a. Large volume of records filed by Countrywide Financial Corporation, which appeared in the case under the fraudulent party designation of “”Non Party”, while the Court interchangeably designated it in its records “Plaintiff”, “Defendant”, “Cross –Defendant”, “Intervenor”, “Real Parties in Interest”, and more, all with no legal foundation at all.
b. Records pertaining to a pretense Summary Judgment proceeding conducted by Judge JACQUELINE CONNOR on August 9, 2007.
3) Defendant consequently filed a complaint with Presiding Judge J STEPHEN CZULEGER regarding conduct of Supervising Judge ROSENBERG. Presiding Judge CZULEGER referred the complaint to Assistant Presiding Judge CHARLES MCCOY, who in turn referred it to Supervising Judge Rosenberg for review. Supervising Judge ROSENBERG found no basis for the complaint.
Samaan v Zernik as a whole was alleged as pretense litigation, and part of a pattern of racketeering activity at the Los Angeles Superior Court.
