07-12-07 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the Los Angeles Superior Court: Judge Patricia Collins false "Order" as served by Attorney David Pasternak and filed by him in Court

Published on May 2016 | Categories: Types, Business/Law, Finance | Downloads: 60 | Comments: 0 | Views: 286
of x
Download PDF   Embed   Report

6. December 7, 2007 pretense Order as served by Attorney David Pasternak.The record is alleged as fraud on numerous accounts, including, but not limited the following:a) The case as a whole is alleged as fraud and racketeering, the Clerk refused to certify any of its records;b) Attorney Pasternak falsely appeared as “Receiver” – with no valid and effectual Appointment Order;c) Judge Collins invalidated the proceeding in her false registration in Sustain;d) The “Order” was served as an insert in a pretense “Notice”, but was never even listed as an exhibit in the “Notice”;e) The “Notice” falsely claimed that the “Order” was served in open court, andf) The Proof of Service fraudulently listed Countrywide, which routinely appeared in the case, under party designation of “Non Party”, and falsely listed Bryan Cave, LLP as its counsel of record in the case.10-08-22 RE: SC087400- Complaint against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) and others - for public corruption and racketeering by judges, financial institutions, and large law-firms in pretense proceedings at the Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, August 21 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI), Clerk of the Court John A Clarke and Attorney Richard Ormond (Buchalter Nemer, LLP) regarding their conduct in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) - for public corruption and racketeering in pretense proceedings at the Court. Others named in the complaint were Judge Jacqueline Connor, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, Judge David Yaffe – Judge in charge of Writs and Receiverships, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Court Counsel Fredrick Bennett, who were all alleged as key figures in racketeering at the Court.In early August 2007, Attorney David Pasternak engaged in conduct that was later opined as “fraud being committed” – in real estate fraud on Beverly Hills property of Complainant on behalf of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, to accomplish his mission, Attorney Pasternak required collusion by Mara Escrow, a subsidiary of ORI. The lawful owner, Dr Joseph Zernik, alerted Mara Escrow Senior Escrow Officer Liz Cohen that she was about to engage in real estate fraud, and therefore, she refused to collude with Attorney Pasternak and the Court.On December 7, 2007, to overcome the problem, Attorney David Pasternak and other engaged in two pretense “ex parte proceedings” at two separate courthouses on the same morning:1) In the first pretense “ex parte proceeding”, Attorney David Pasternak appeared as pretense “Receiver” – albeit , with no valid and effectual Appointment Order – with Attorney Richard Ormond before Judge Lisa Hart-Cole to request Court approval of various documents, including, but not limited to:a. Grant Deeds, which were later opined by fraud expert as “fraud being committed”, andb. “Indemnity Agreement” for Mara Escrow – for future criminality. However, both Judge Hart-Cole and Attorney Richard Ormond refused to disclose the name of the Counsel or the party he was representing in Court. Defendant filed peremptory challenge with Judge Hart-Cole. Consequently, Judge Hart-Cole issued a recusal Minute Order. However, later she secretly “disposed” of the Minutes, effectively eliminating the record of the proceeding.2) In the second “ex parte proceeding”, Judge Patricia Collins pretended to approve the records, later opined as fraud. However, Judge Collins secretly created void registration for the proceeding in Sustain - the Court’s case management system. The complaint alleged that the mere notion of conducting such proceedings at the Court reflected the impunity of the criminal enterprise. Moreover, the complaint alleged that conduct o

Comments

Content

Sponsor Documents

Recommended


View All
Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close