07-12-07 Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) at the Los Angeles Superior Court: Minutes as filed by the Court of Judge Lisa Hart-Cole

Published on July 2016 | Categories: Types, Business/Law, Court Filings | Downloads: 45 | Comments: 0 | Views: 270
of x
Download PDF   Embed   Report

The Minutes are alleged as fraud on numerous accounts, including, but not limited to the following:a) The case as a whole is alleged as fraud - the Clerk of the Court refused to certify any of its records;b) Attorney David Pasternak appeared as pretense "Receiver" - with no valid and effectual Appointment Order;c) The Minutes were served on one party only;d) The Minutes falsely listed proceeding on matter that was never heard as its title, concealing as secondary the Peremptory Challenge, which was the only matter heard by Judge Hart-Cole, ande) The Minutes, as registered in Sustain – the Court’s case management system showed that Judge Hart-Cole secretly “disposed” of the proceeding.10-08-22 RE: SC087400- Complaint against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) and others - for public corruption and racketeering by judges, financial institutions, and large law-firms in pretense proceedings at the Court. Executive Summary Los Angles, August 21 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI), Clerk of the Court John A Clarke and Attorney Richard Ormond (Buchalter Nemer, LLP) regarding their conduct in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) - for public corruption and racketeering in pretense proceedings at the Court. Others named in the complaint were Judge Jacqueline Connor, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, Judge David Yaffe – Judge in charge of Writs and Receiverships, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Court Counsel Fredrick Bennett, who were all alleged as key figures in racketeering at the Court.In early August 2007, Attorney David Pasternak engaged in conduct that was later opined as “fraud being committed” – in real estate fraud on Beverly Hills property of Complainant on behalf of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, to accomplish his mission, Attorney Pasternak required collusion by Mara Escrow, a subsidiary of ORI. The lawful owner, Dr Joseph Zernik, alerted Mara Escrow Senior Escrow Officer Liz Cohen that she was about to engage in real estate fraud, and therefore, she refused to collude with Attorney Pasternak and the Court.On December 7, 2007, to overcome the problem, Attorney David Pasternak and other engaged in two pretense “ex parte proceedings” at two separate courthouses on the same morning:1) In the first pretense “ex parte proceeding”, Attorney David Pasternak appeared as pretense “Receiver” – albeit , with no valid and effectual Appointment Order – with Attorney Richard Ormond before Judge Lisa Hart-Cole to request Court approval of various documents, including, but not limited to:a. Grant Deeds, which were later opined by fraud expert as “fraud being committed”, andb. “Indemnity Agreement” for Mara Escrow – for future criminality. However, both Judge Hart-Cole and Attorney Richard Ormond refused to disclose the name of the Counsel or the party he was representing in Court. Defendant filed peremptory challenge with Judge Hart-Cole. Consequently, Judge Hart-Cole issued a recusal Minute Order. However, later she secretly “disposed” of the Minutes, effectively eliminating the record of the proceeding.2) In the second “ex parte proceeding”, Judge Patricia Collins pretended to approve the records, later opined as fraud. However, Judge Collins secretly created void registration for the proceeding in Sustain - the Court’s case management system. The complaint alleged that the mere notion of conducting such proceedings at the Court reflected the impunity of the criminal enterprise. Moreover, the complaint alleged that conduct of Samaan v Zernik was unique in documenting conditions in Los Angeles County, California, where the Court was not only permissive and conducive of criminality, but also co

Comments

Content

The Minutes are alleged as fraud on numerous accounts, including, but not limited to the following:
a) The case as a whole is alleged as fraud - the Clerk of the Court refused to certify any of its records;
b) Attorney David Pasternak appeared as pretense "Receiver" - with no valid and effectual Appointment Order;
c) The Minutes were served on one party only;
d) The Minutes falsely listed proceeding on matter that was never heard as its title, concealing as secondary the Peremptory Challenge, which was the only matter heard by Judge Hart-Cole, and
e) The Minutes, as registered in Sustain – the Court’s case management system showed that Judge Hart-Cole secretly “disposed” of the proceeding.


10-08-22 RE: SC087400- Complaint against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) and others - for public corruption and racketeering by judges, financial institutions, and large law-firms in pretense proceedings at the Court.

Executive Summary
Los Angles, August 21 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against Judge (ret) Patricia Collins, Judge Lisa Hart-Cole, Attorney David Pasternak, Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI), Clerk of the Court John A Clarke and Attorney Richard Ormond (Buchalter Nemer, LLP) regarding their conduct in Samaan v Zernik (SC087400) - for public corruption and racketeering in pretense proceedings at the Court. Others named in the complaint were Judge Jacqueline Connor, Presiding Judge Charles McCoy, Judge David Yaffe – Judge in charge of Writs and Receiverships, Clerk of the Court John A Clarke, Court Counsel Fredrick Bennett, who were all alleged as key figures in racketeering at the Court.
In early August 2007, Attorney David Pasternak engaged in conduct that was later opined as “fraud being committed” – in real estate fraud on Beverly Hills property of Complainant on behalf of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. However, to accomplish his mission, Attorney Pasternak required collusion by Mara Escrow, a subsidiary of ORI.
The lawful owner, Dr Joseph Zernik, alerted Mara Escrow Senior Escrow Officer Liz Cohen that she was about to engage in real estate fraud, and therefore, she refused to collude with Attorney Pasternak and the Court.
On December 7, 2007, to overcome the problem, Attorney David Pasternak and other engaged in two pretense “ex parte proceedings” at two separate courthouses on the same morning:
1) In the first pretense “ex parte proceeding”, Attorney David Pasternak appeared as pretense “Receiver” – albeit , with no valid and effectual Appointment Order – with Attorney Richard Ormond before Judge Lisa Hart-Cole to request Court approval of various documents, including, but not limited to:
a. Grant Deeds, which were later opined by fraud expert as “fraud being committed”, and
b. “Indemnity Agreement” for Mara Escrow – for future criminality.
However, both Judge Hart-Cole and Attorney Richard Ormond refused to disclose the name of the Counsel or the party he was representing in Court.
Defendant filed peremptory challenge with Judge Hart-Cole. Consequently, Judge Hart-Cole issued a recusal Minute Order. However, later she secretly “disposed” of the Minutes, effectively eliminating the record of the proceeding.
2) In the second “ex parte proceeding”, Judge Patricia Collins pretended to approve the records, later opined as fraud. However, Judge Collins secretly created void registration for the proceeding in Sustain - the Court’s case management system.
The complaint alleged that the mere notion of conducting such proceedings at the Court reflected the impunity of the criminal enterprise. Moreover, the complaint alleged that conduct of Samaan v Zernik was unique in documenting conditions in Los Angeles County, California, where the Court was not only permissive and conducive of criminality, but also co

Sponsor Documents

Recommended


View All
Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close