Albertelli Law Service Notice, Notice of Appeal

Published on June 2016 | Categories: Types, Business/Law | Downloads: 203 | Comments: 0 | Views: 871
of 19
Download PDF   Embed   Report

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDABANKUNITED, as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB., Plaintiff,vs. CASE NO.: 09-6016-CAJENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al. NOTICE OF APPEAL, DISPOSITION, AND BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE___________________________________________________________________________/COUNSEL, ALBERTELLI LAW, SERVICE NOTICE OFNOTICE OF APPEAL AND DISPOSITION IN FAVOR OF J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTTBANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT., EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrumentDISPOSITION NOTICE IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTTPURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERICAL CODE, AND U.C.C., ART. 3,AND FLORIDA LAWNOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ALTERATIONS OF RECORD1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was never served, hereby appeals from a. The unlawful alteration of the official documents, records, and Case Docket;b. The lack of any record of the purported “disposition” in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor in the Case File;c. The lack of any record of the dismissal in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor;d. The absence of the FINAL DISPOSITION FORM, § 25.075, Florida Statutes, and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.998, from the Case File;e. The lack of any record, reason, and/or explanation of the publicly recorded removal of the August 2010 “complaint” in the Case File;f. The absence of any record, reason, and explanation of the publicly recorded removal of the August 2010 “summons” from the Case File;g. The lack of any transparency, accountability, due process, and equal protection of law;h. The record lack of any mortgage or note in this facially fraudulent and frivolous action;i. The lack of any record of the removal of ALFRED CAMNER, Esq., and the CAMNER LIPSITZ law firm and its Attorneys from the mock proceedings;j. The record lack of the means of final disposition before any hearing.RECORD ABSENCE OF FINAL DISPOSITION FORM, § 25.075, FLA. STAT.2. Jennifer Franklin Prescott could not find the Final Disposition Form, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.998, in the Case File on Tuesday, August 17, 2010. See § 25.075, Florida Statutes.ABSENCE OF DISMISSAL IN JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S FAVOR3. On Tuesday, August 17, 2010, Jennifer Franklin Prescott could not find the Dismissal in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor in the Case File.DEFENDANT JUDGE HUGH D. HAYES SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL ON 08/18/20104. On August 18, 2010, Defendant Judge Hayes substituted Counsel, and BILL McCOLLUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and Shelley B. Cridlin, Fla. Bar No. 0022451, made an appearance as counsel for Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes, in place of any and all prior counsel in Federal Case 2:2009-cv-00791.FALSIFICATIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS APPARENT5. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reported Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s Office on August 12, 13, and 16, and 17, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed a. “disposition”;b. “complaint”; andc. “summons”,none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse.DEMANDS FOR CLARIFICATION AND EVIDENCE6. On Monday, August 16, AM, and Tuesday, August 17, 2010, PM, at the Naples Courthouse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see the Case File evidence of:a. “disposition”;b. “complaint”; and c. “summons” in this fraudulent action.DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE/ERROR7. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott thata. NO “August 2010 complaint”, and b. NO “August 2010 summons”appeared in the Case File.NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE8. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments. Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed, and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to pro

Comments

Content

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BANKUNITED, as [purported] successor in interest to [SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB., Plaintiff, vs. JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al. NOTICE OF APPEAL, DISPOSITION, AND BANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE ___________________________________________________________________________/ CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA

COUNSEL, ALBERTELLI LAW, SERVICE NOTICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DISPOSITION IN FAVOR OF J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTT BANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT., EVIDENCE OF NO entitlement to enforce non-existent instrument DISPOSITION NOTICE IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT PURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERICAL CODE, AND U.C.C., ART. 3, AND FLORIDA LAW

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ALTERATIONS OF RECORD 1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was never served, hereby appeals from a. The unlawful alteration of the official documents, records, and Case Docket; b. The lack of any record of the purported “disposition” in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor in the Case File;

c. The lack of any record of the dismissal in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor; d. The absence of the FINAL DISPOSITION FORM, § 25.075, Florida Statutes, and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.998, from the Case File; e. The lack of any record, reason, and/or explanation of the publicly recorded removal of the August 2010 “complaint” in the Case File; f. The absence of any record, reason, and explanation of the publicly recorded removal of the August 2010 “summons” from the Case File; g. The lack of any transparency, accountability, due process, and equal protection of law; h. The record lack of any mortgage or note in this facially fraudulent and frivolous action; i. The lack of any record of the removal of ALFRED CAMNER, Esq., and the CAMNER LIPSITZ law firm and its Attorneys from the mock proceedings; j. The record lack of the means of final disposition before any hearing. RECORD ABSENCE OF FINAL DISPOSITION FORM, § 25.075, FLA. STAT. 2. Jennifer Franklin Prescott could not find the Final Disposition Form, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.998, in the Case File on Tuesday, August 17, 2010. See § 25.075, Florida Statutes. ABSENCE OF DISMISSAL IN JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S FAVOR 3. On Tuesday, August 17, 2010, Jennifer Franklin Prescott could not find the Dismissal in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor in the Case File. DEFENDANT JUDGE HUGH D. HAYES SUBSTITUTED COUNSEL ON 08/18/2010
4.

On August 18, 2010, Defendant Judge Hayes substituted Counsel, and BILL McCOLLUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and Shelley B. Cridlin, Fla. Bar No. 0022451, made an appearance as counsel for Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes, in place of any and all prior counsel in Federal Case 2:2009-cv-00791.

2

FALSIFICATIONS AND/OR ALTERATIONS APPARENT 5. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reported Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’s Office on August 12, 13, and 16, and 17, 2010. While the electronic Docket showed a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons”, none could be ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse. DEMANDS FOR CLARIFICATION AND EVIDENCE 6. On Monday, August 16, AM, and Tuesday, August 17, 2010, PM, at the Naples Courthouse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demanded to see the Case File evidence of: a. “disposition”; b. “complaint”; and c. “summons” in this fraudulent action. DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE/ERROR 7. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott that a. NO “August 2010 complaint”, and b. NO “August 2010 summons” appeared in the Case File. NO negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE 8. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments. Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “negotiable instrument” existed, and no promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money and interest existed in this fraudulent action. Bankrupt and seized Bankunited was unable to prove any right to

3

enforce the admittedly non-existent purported “instrument”. Here, the Court may not enter judgment in favor of seized and bankrupt Bankunited. See UCC, Article 3. Here, the Court must enter judgment in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was not served and does not submit to any jurisdiction, moves this Court to declare the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court, and enter judgment of dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT HOLDS FREE & CLEAR RECORD TITLE 9. Jennifer Franklin Prescott holds unencumbered record title to the subject protected homestead real property. See Collier County Public Records. PURPORTED “DISPOSITION” 10. The Case Docket stated “disposition”:

The purported “disposition date” was “08/12/2010”. RULE 1.540, FLA. R. CIV. P. 11. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P., authorizes the court to correct mistakes in a judgment. Here, purported “disposition” appeared on the official Docket. Here there were no note, no entitlement to enforce the admittedly lost/destroyed note, no service, no hearing, and no due process. Here, records were altered. BANKUNITED VIOLATED CH. 49, FLA. STAT.

4

12. Seized and bankrupt Bankunited violated Ch. 49, Fla. Stat., for illegal purposes of defrauding Jennifer Franklin Prescott and perpetrating fraud on this Court. In this fraudulent Case, service by publication was not allowed: 49.011 Service of process by publication; cases in which allowed. 49.021 Service of process by publication, upon whom. 49.031 Sworn statement as condition precedent. 49.041 Sworn statement, natural person as defendant. 49.051 Sworn statement, corporation as defendant. 49.061 Sworn statement, parties doing business under a corporate name as defendants. 49.071 Sworn statement, unknown parties as defendants. 49.08 Notice of action, form. 49.09 Notice of action, return day. 49.10 Notice of action, publication, proof. 49.11 Notice of action, posting, proof. 49.12 Mailing of notice of action. RECORD PERJURY 13. The record and Case File showed perjury by, e.g., Nicholas Krancher. See Exhibits on file. PURPORTED “SUMMONS” 14. Purportedly, a summons was issued, “ELSA JARERO”, who is not any known party to this fraudulent action. The summons disappeared from the record without any explanation.

PURPORTED “COMPLAINT” 15. A “complaint” appeared on the Docket.

Pursuant to Rule 1.190, Fla.R.Civ.P., the Court had never granted any leave. The summons disappeared from the record without any explanation. PURPORTED plaintiff HAD NO right to enforce FICTITIOUS note 16. Seized and bankrupt BankUnited was not entitled to enforce a fictitious note. Here, BankUnited was not any holder of any note or mortgage at the time it filed suit or any time

5

thereafter. It is elementary that to be a holder, one must be in possession of the instrument. See s. 673.3011, F.S. Here, BankUnited was not any proper party to file suit to foreclose a fictitious un-delivered lost and/or destroyed instrument. IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY delivery 17. Under Florida law delivery is necessary to validate a negotiable instrument. A lost and/or destroyed note or mortgage could not have possibly been delivered. IMPOSSIBILITY OF ANY reestablishment 18. Here, the lost and/or destroyed note or mortgage could not have possibly been reestablished pursuant to Ch. 71, Fla. Stat. EMERGENCY AND THREAT OF FURTHER INJURY 19. Known foreclosure fraud is an EMERGENCY. Further injury must be prevented. NO note – NO default 20. The purported plaintiff did not own or hold any note. No obligation existed. No “default” could have possibly occurred. See also Uniform Commercial Code; Negotiable Instruments. UNKNOWN LOSS OR DESTRUCTION 21. The bankrupt and seized “plaintiff” bank asserted that any “promissory note and mortgage have been lost or destroyed and are not in the custody or control of Bankunited, and the time and manner of the loss or destruction is unknown.” In this Case, Bankunited could not have possibly reestablished any lost or destroyed note or mortgage. CAMNER KNEW THAT reestablishment WAS IMPOSSIBLE, CH. 71, FLA. STAT. 22. In particular, Founder and Attorney Alfred Camner and his law firm knew that Bankunited could not have possibly reestablished any lost or destroyed note or mortgage. SEIZURE OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED

6

23. On Thursday, May 21, 2009, BankUnited, FSB, Coral Gables, FL was seized by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named Receiver. Said seizure stripped away the main asset that belonged to the holding company, BankUnited Financial Corp. Counsel Alfred Camner was the largest shareholder. 24. The June 22 Report by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) was critical of the bank’s management and Attorney and Founder Alfred Camner. See Counsel, Camner Lipsitz law firm. FAILURE & SEIZURE OF THE PURPORTED plaintiff 25. BankUnited, FSB’s failure in May 2009 cost the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp’s insurance fund about $5.7 billion – the second most costly failure in FDIC history. NO instrument, and NO lien 26. Here, there was neither any instrument nor any lien. No property was described. NO interest, and NO successor in interest 27. Here, Bankunited, FSB, had no interest. Here, Bankunited was not and could not have possibly been any successor in interest. No sum was due to the plaintiff bankrupt bank. NO rights and NO standing 28. Here, Bankunited, just like Bankunited, FSB, had no rights and no standing. NO conditions precedent – FACIALLY FRIVOLOUS action 29. Here, the conditions precedent to the institution of any foreclosure action did not occur and could not have possibly occurred. Here on its face, the sham action was frivolous. THE COURT KNEW THAT reestablishment WAS IMPOSSIBLE 30. Here as a matter of law, “reestablishment” was impossible. Here, the falsified “promissory note and mortgage have been lost or destroyed and are not in the custody or control of

7

Bankunited, and the time and manner of the loss or destruction is unknown.” See Ch. 71, Fla. Stat. 31. Here, Jennifer Franklin’s record title to her homestead property was free and clear. PROTECTED HOMESTEAD PROPERTY 32. Franklin Prescott’s property is protected homestead property. 33. As a matter of law, any accounting under a prima facie non-existent note and mortgage was impossible. The prima facie non-meritorious demand for an accounting was fraudulent. 34. Jennifer Franklin Prescott is not any “married woman”. 35. Jennifer Franklin Prescott is not any defendant and was not served. 36. Hugh D. Hayes is a named party Defendant in several actions. See, e.g., Summons/service, U.S.A. Ex Rel, et al. v. U.S.A., et al. in U.S. District Court. RECUSAL LAW 37. In light of the publicly recorded alterations of the official records and documents, Jennifer Franklin Prescott has been forced to live in fear of public corruption and the lack of any opportunity of fair, just, and transparent due process and proceedings. 38. Here, Defendant Judge Hayes knew that a. Bankrupt Bankunited did not hold any instrument; b. Seized and bankrupt Bankunited had no right to enforce and prosecute; c. Florida’s real party in interest Rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a), only permitted an action to be prosecuted if there had been an actual interest. RULE 1.432 DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE “(a) Grounds. Any party may move to disqualify the judge assigned to the action on the grounds provided by statute. (b) Contents. A motion to disqualify shall allege the facts relied on to show the grounds for disqualification and shall be verified by the party.

8

(c) Time. A motion to disqualify shall be made within a reasonable time after discovery of the facts constituting grounds for disqualification. (d) Determination. The judge against whom the motion is directed shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion. The judge shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged. If the motion is legally sufficient, the judge shall enter an order of disqualification and proceed no further in the action. (e) Judge's Initiative. Nothing in this rule limits a judge's authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative.” Said rule was intended to unify the procedure for judicial disqualification. RULE 2.330. DISQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGES 39. Said Rule stated: (a) Application. This rule applies only to county and circuit judges in all matters in all divisions of court. (b) Parties. Any party, including the state, may move to disqualify the trial judge assigned to the case on grounds provided by rule, by statute, or by the Code of Judicial Conduct. (c) Motion. A motion to disqualify shall: (1) be in writing; (2) allege specifically the facts and reasons upon which the movant relies as the grounds for disqualification; (3) be sworn to by the party by signing the motion under oath or by a separate affidavit;” SECTION 38.10, FLA. STAT. 40. Section 38.10 gives parties the right to move to disqualify a judge when the party fears that “he or she will not receive a fair trial . . . on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party.” Fla. Stat. § 38.10. Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330 specifies that a motion to disqualify must show that “the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330. 41. S. 38.10, Fla. Stat., stated:

9

38.10 Disqualification of judge for prejudice; application; affidavits; etc.-Whenever a party to any action or proceeding makes and files an affidavit stating fear that he or she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is pending on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party, the judge shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified. 42. Here, Franklin Prescott has been “stating fear that she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is [purportedly] pending on account of the objective prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant. Here, objectively biased Judge Hayes “shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified.” JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S RIGHT TO APPEAL 43. If the judge denies a motion to disqualify brought under § 38.10 the movant has the right to appeal. Lynch v. State, ___ So. 2d ___, Nos. SC06-2233, SC07-1246, 2008 WL 4809783, at *26 (Fla. Nov. 6, 2008). As the Florida Supreme Court recently held: “A motion to disqualify is governed substantively by section 38.10, Florida Statutes, and procedurally by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330. Here, Franklin Prescott’s motion to disqualify Defendant objectively partial Judge Hayes is citing § 38.10 and Rule 2.330, as well as Canon 3E(1). 44. The Florida Supreme Court has also held, in effect, that § 38.10 and the Canons require the same thing. See Livingston v. State, 441 So. 2d 1083, 1086 (Fla. 1983). In Livingston the court cited the Canon’s requirement that a judge disqualify himself when his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned” and concluded that it was “totally consistent” with Florida case law applying § 38.10. Id. Both require disqualification when a party can show “a well

10

grounded fear that she will not receive a fair trial at the hands of the judge.” Id. (quoting State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 179 So. 695, 697-98 (Fla. 1938)); see also Berry v. Berry, 765 So. 2d 855, 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (quoting Canon 3E(1) when describing the standard for granting a motion under § 38.10). Here of course, this Court was bound to follow Florida appellate court decisions interpreting that state’s law. The final arbiter of state law is the state Supreme Court, which is another way of saying that Florida law is what the Florida Supreme Court says it is. CANON(S) 3E(1), 3E(1)(f), FLORIDA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT 45. The Florida Supreme Court has adopted a Code of Judicial Conduct to govern the actions of state court judges and candidates for judicial office. Canon 3E(1) states, e.g.: (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where … 46. Those provisions address situations in which a judge must disqualify himself because his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned,” including when he has “made a public statement that commits, or appears to commit, the judge with respect to” a particular party, issue, or controversy. Canon 3E(1) [general disqualification provision in Canon 3E(1)], 3E(1)(f) [“commits clause” at Canon 3E(1)(f)]. 47. Canon 3E(1), backed by the threat of a disciplinary proceeding, requires a judge to disqualify himself if his “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Fla. Stat. § 38.10, supplemented by Rule 2.330, allows a party to have a judge disqualified for the same reason. 48. Canon 3E(1)(f), which the Florida Supreme Court adopted in January 2006, covers one area in which a judge’s “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” See In re Amendment to Code of Judicial Conduct, 918 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 2006). In addition to the Florida Supreme Court, the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (Ethics Committee) and the Judicial 11

Qualifications Commission (JQC) have roles in administering the Code. The Florida Supreme Court established the Ethics Committee “to render written advisory opinions to inquiring judges concerning the propriety of contemplated judicial and non-judicial conduct.” Petition of Comm. on Standards of Conduct for Judges, 327 So. 2d 5, 5 (Fla. 1976). 49. Canon 3E is enforced by the Judicial Qualifications Commission, which has the authority to bring disciplinary charges against a judge. SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS – WELL-GROUNDED FEARS 50. Here, Franklin Prescott has been specifically alleging the following facts and reasons upon which the movant relied as the grounds for Defendant County Judge Hayes’ disqualification. Here, Franklin Prescott had well grounded fears that she will not receive a fair trial at the hands of Defendant objectively partial and bribed County Judge Hugh D. Hayes. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE 51. Jennifer Franklin Prescott adopts by reference the pleadings and EXHIBITS on file and of record in this Notice of Appeal and Notice of Disposition of facially fraudulent action. WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demands 1. An Order clarifying the disposition in favor of J. Franklin Prescott on the official record; 2. An Order declaring the purported action fraudulent and a fraud on the Court; 3. An Order clarifying said purported “disposition”, “summons”, and “complaint”; 4. An Order for judgment and dismissal in favor of Jennifer Franklin Prescott on the record; 5. An Order declaring non-service on any defendant in this fraudulent action, Ch. 49, Fla. Stat.; 6. An Order extinguishing the facially non-meritorious action;

12

7. An Order declaring the admitted lack of any record of any note or mortgage; 8. An Order declaring any reestablishment of any note or mortgage impossible; 9. An Order declaring the lack of any interest by Bankunited; 10. An Order declaring the action without any merit under existing law; 11. An Order enjoining any further fraud and harassment by Bankunited; 12. An Order for sanctions and expenses against said seized and bankrupt bank and its dismissed and/or fired attorneys at Camner Lipsitz; 13. An Order removing the fired judicial officers with the Camner Lipsitz firm from these proceedings, and striking their fraudulent pleadings, because they perpetrated record fraud and fraud on this Court. ________________________ /s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott, record holder of unencumbered title to homestead property Victim of bankrupt Bankunited’s record fraud Victim of seized Bankunited founder Alfred Camner’s record fraud on this Court EXHIBITS ON FILE: DOCKET ALTERATIONS UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE U.C.C. Article 3, Negotiable Instruments PERJURY EVIDENCE, Nicholas Krancher § 673.3011, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 71, Fla. Stat. F.D.I.C. FAILED BANK INFORMATION

13

8/14/2010

Public Inquiry

Find it here... Site Search

Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List Case Information Printer Friendly Version

Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Case Status: DISPO SED Next Court Date: Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 Disposition Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Disposed: 08/12/2010 Reopen Reason: Reopened: Reopen Close: A ppealed: Filed: 07/09/2009

Parties

Dockets of 1 page s. Text

Events

Financials Entrie s pe r page :

1
Date

60

All Entries

07/09/2009 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (FILING) 07/09/2009 C IVIL C O VER SHEET 07/09/2009 C O MPLAINT 07/09/2009 NO TIC E O F LIS PENDENS 07/09/2009 PAID $10.00 PER ISSUANC E O F SUMMO NS $40.00 07/09/2009 R EAL PR O PER TY VALUATIO N SHEET 07/10/2009 SUMMO NS ISSUED JENNIFER FR ANKLIN PR ESC O TT/ W ALTER P R ESC O TT/ JO HN DO E/ MAR Y DO E/ PLAC ED IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS SER VER S BIN 09/03/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS MAR Y DO E 10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F LO ST O R IGINAL SUMMO NS JO HN DO E 10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JO HN DO E 12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS W ALTER PR ESC O TT 12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT 02/22/2010 NO TIC E O F APP EAR ANC E AS C O -CO UNSEL BY ER IN M R O SE Q UINN O N BEHALF O F PLT 04/06/2010 ALIAS SUMMO NS ISSUED JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/W ALTER PR ESC O TT/P LAC ED IN PR O VEST LLC BIN 05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS JENNIFER FR ANKLIN PR ESC O TT 05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F NO N-SER VIC E O F SUMMO NS W ALTER PR ESC O TT 06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO C LERK 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F C O NSTR UC TIVE SER VIC E AS TO ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N PAR TIES C LAIMING 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

1/2

8/14/2010
06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW

Public Inquiry

06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW

06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N PAR TIES C LAIMING 06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10 06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10 07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT 07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD 08/10/2010 C O MPLAINT 08/12/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS PR O SE JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT 08/12/2010 BANKR UPTC Y BANKUNITED 08/12/2010 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (DISPO SITIO N) 08/12/2010 SUMMO NS ISSUED ELSA JAR ER O / PUT IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS BIN

W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur. W e apologize in advance for any inconve nie nce. Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

2/2

8/13/2010

Public Inquiry

Find it here... Site Search

Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List Case Information Printer Friendly Version

Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Case Status: O PEN Next Court Date: Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 Disposition Judge: Disposed: Reopen Reason: Reopened: Reopen Close: A ppealed: Filed: 07/09/2009

Parties

Dockets of 2 page s. Text

Events

Financials Entrie s pe r page :

2
Date

20

All Entries

06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT 06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N PAR TIES C LAIMING 06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10 06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10 07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT 07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD 08/10/2010 C O MPLAINT 08/12/2010 SUMMO NS ISSUED ELSA JAR ER O / PUT IN SO UTH FLO R IDA PR O C ESS BIN

W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur. W e apologize in advance for any inconve nie nce. Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

1/2

8/13/2010

Public Inquiry

addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

2/2

8/17/2010

Public Inquiry

Find it here... Site Search

Home / Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - A LL / C ase - 112009C A0060160001XX Ne w Se a rch R e turn to C ase List Case Information Printer Friendly Version

Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT, JENNIFER Uniform Case Number: 112009C A0060160001XX Clerks Case Number: 0906016C A Court Type: C IR C UIT CIVIL Case Type: MO R TGAGE FO R ECLO SUR ES Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Case Status: DISPO SED Next Court Date: Last Docket Date: 08/12/2010 Disposition Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Disposed: 08/12/2010 Reopen Reason: Reopened: Reopen Close: A ppealed: Filed: 07/09/2009

Parties

Dockets of 2 page s. Text

Events

Financials Entrie s pe r page :

2
Date

20

All Entries

06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT 06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F DILIGENT SEAR C H AS TO JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-P R ESC O TT 06/15/2010 C O RR ESPO NDENCE FR O M C O UNSEL TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 06/17/2010 NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PR ESC O TT & ANY AND ALL UNKNO W N PAR TIES C LAIMING 06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F MAILING MAILED 6/18/10 06/18/2010 C O NFIR MATIO N O F EMAIL R EC EIVED BY GULF C O AST BUSINESS R EVIEW 07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT O F PUBLIC ATIO N NO TIC E O F AC TIO N TO W ALTER PR ESC O TT/JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT/ANSW ER W ITHIN 30 DAYS O F FIRST PUBLIC ATIO N 6/25/10 07/09/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT /PR O SE 07/22/2010 MO TIO N TO ENJO IN / BY JENNIFER FR ANKLIN-PR ESC O TT -P RO SE 07/22/2010 NO TIC E O F SER VIC E O F PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D & MO TIO N TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT 07/23/2010 MO TIO N FO R C LAR IFIC ATIO N O F C O UNSEL 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS 07/23/2010 MO TIO N TO C LAR IFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NO TIC E O F R EC O R D FR AUD 08/12/2010 MO TIO N TO DISMISS PR O SE JENNIFER FR ANKLIN P RESC O TT 08/12/2010 BANKR UPTC Y BANKUNITED 08/12/2010 C A48/R EAL PR O PER TY MO R TGAGE FO R EC LO SUR E (PR E 2010) (DISPO SITIO N)

W e dne sday night is re gular m a inte nance tim e on our se rve rs; as a re sult brie f o utage s m ay o ccur. W e apolo gize in advance for any inconve nie nce .

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

1/2

8/17/2010

p

g

Public Inquiry y

Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FA Qs | Contact Us This we bsite is m aintaine d by The C ollie r C ounty C le rk of the C ircuit C ourt. Unde r Flo rida law, e m ail addre sse s are public re co rds. If you do not want your e m a il addre ss re le ase d in re sponse to a public re cords re que st, do not se nd e m ail to this e ntity. Inste ad, co ntact this office by phone or in writing.

apps.collierclerk.com/…/Case.aspx?UC…

2/2

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close