We examine the pricing relevance of credit rating downgrades when the underlying rm has Credit Default Swap (CDS) contracts trading on its debt. Using a comprehensive sample of credit rating changes from 1998 to 2007, we find that, after a CDScontract starts trading on a firms debt, the firms stock reacts signifi cantly less to acredit rating downgrade. Firms with traded CDS also have a smaller stock and bondmarket reaction to a credit rating downgrade than firms without a traded CDS. In addition, CDS spreads explain the cross-sectional variation in primary and secondary bondyields better than credit ratings. Overall, we provide empirical evidence supporting CDSmarket as a viable alternative to credit ratings. An important implication of our studyis that regulators should also focus on improving the transparency in CDS market ratherthan solely addressing the conflicts of interest inherent in the business models for ratingagencies.
Comments
Content
We examine the pricing relevance of credit rating downgrades when the underlying rm has Credit Default Swap (CDS) contracts trading on its debt. Using a comprehensive sample of credit rating changes from 1998 to 2007, we find that, after a CDS contract starts trading on a firms debt, the firms stock reacts signifi cantly less to a credit rating downgrade. Firms with traded CDS also have a smaller stock and bond market reaction to a credit rating downgrade than firms without a traded CDS. In addition, CDS spreads explain the cross-sectional variation in primary and secondary bond yields better than credit ratings. Overall, we provide empirical evidence supporting CDS market as a viable alternative to credit ratings. An important implication of our study is that regulators should also focus on improving the transparency in CDS market rather than solely addressing the conflicts of interest inherent in the business models for rating agencies.