Borrowing Against Receivables Gets Cheaper, Easier - WSJ

Published on June 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 33 | Comments: 0 | Views: 137
of 4
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Trade finance receivables finance

Comments

Content

8/1/2014

Borrowing Against Receivables Gets Cheaper, Easier - WSJ

Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues,
clients or customers, use the Order Reprints tool at the bottom of any article or visit www.djreprints.com
See a sample reprint in PDF
format.

Order a reprint of this article now

JR: SMALL BIZ MAY 09
THE MONEY GAME

Getting Your Due
Entrepreneurs are trying to take the stigma out of borrowing against receivables
By SIMON A C OVEL
Updated May 11, 2009 12:01 a.m. ET

Data Drive Thru Inc. was on a roll. The Dallas company had received $1.5 million in start-up money from
an angel investor. Its signature product, a tool to transfer data from one computer to another, won an award
at a trade show and landed on shelves at big-box stores like Staples.
But the company hit a financial wall in the second half of last year. A second round of angel funding,
expected to come in at $7.5 million, fell through as credit markets froze. The company was too young to
have the well-established cash flows needed to get a bank loan, and retail customers were taking longer
and longer to pay—as many as 30 extra days in some cases.
The Journal Report
See the complete Small Business report.

“Everyone is holding onto cash as much as they can,” Chief
Financial Officer Brad Oldham says.

So Mr. Oldham took an unconventional step: He listed the
company’s accounts receivable—invoices due to be paid by the big-box stores that buy Data Drive Thru’s
products—on a new online auction site called the Receivables Exchange. Anonymous lenders bid on those
receivables, agreeing to lend Data Drive Thru money against them and then take a cut when customers
pay the bills.
Borrowing against receivables isn’t new. For hundreds of years, cash-strapped companies have hired
people or companies known as factors to advance them funds based on money owed by customers. But
with interest rates sometimes exceeding 30% or 40% annually and tales of unsavory business practices,
this small corner of finance is considered by many to be a funding source of last resort.
A few companies are trying to change that with products and services designed to make the process of
borrowing against customer invoices cheaper and more transparent. These products are gaining ground in
the recession as companies—particularly small, untested ones—find their credit lines cut and other
sources of funding gone.
Mr. Oldham had worked with factors before and didn’t like the high prices. But he knew Data Drive Thru’s
receivables were valuable; the company regularly collects hundreds of thousands of dollars from big, wellknown office-supply stores. “Retailers may not be real fast paying, but they do pay,” he says.
That’s the ideal scenario for Receivables Exchange LLC, which launched its first online receivables auction
in November. The New Orleans company—executives describe it as eBay for receivables—provides the
platform for companies like Data Drive Thru to post their invoices. Lenders then peruse the site, searching
for receivables against which they are willing to lend. Lenders bid on those invoices, with the majority
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204475004574126842665466408#printMode

1/4

8/1/2014

Borrowing Against Receivables Gets Cheaper, Easier - WSJ

electing a fixed buyout price similar to eBay’s “buy it now” feature.
The next day, the borrower is wired the money, minus the lender’s fee, which might be two, three or four
cents on the dollar. Receivables Exchange, which is in the background verifying that the invoices are real,
takes a varying percentage commission on each trade.
While the credit crunch has buoyed Receivables Exchange’s growth on the borrowing side—the company
has 200 customers and says its sweet spot is a firm with $10 million to $100 million in revenue—it also has
translated into fewer lenders. Exchange co-founder Justin Brownhill says he expected to see 20 times as
much demand as supply on the exchange. Instead, with $7.5 billion in invoices and $15 billion in available
capital, it’s about a two-to-one ratio, largely because banks haven’t stepped up as much as expected amid
their own vast problems.
Hedge funds have made up for some of the lag. As many as 40% of the lenders on the exchange are
hedge funds looking for solid returns as other types of investments sag. Banks, asset-based lenders and
factoring companies each comprise about 20% of the lending base.
Borrowers don’t know who’s providing the loan. Mr. Oldham, for one, says he doesn’t much care. In the
past few months, he has posted hundreds of thousands of dollars in invoices—usually at least one auction
per week—in exchange for a cash advance. Participating in repeated auctions with a solid payment history
has bolstered his company’s reputation on the site, which in turn has lowered his cost of capital to less
than 3% every 30 days, down from 4% in the beginning.
“Every auction I’ve had, it closes one day and the money is wired to my account” the next day, Mr. Oldham
says. “It doesn’t matter to me who it is.”

Keeping It Real
While the generally steady cash flow from receivables appeals to bank lenders, many say they just don’t
have the infrastructure or manpower to monitor each borrower’s customers to make sure their invoices are
up to snuff. That’s where FTrans Corp. comes in. The Atlanta technology company offers a sort of virtual
clearinghouse for companies, their bankers and their suppliers. A company posts its receivables on
FTrans’s online system, and FTrans verifies that the invoices are real, giving banks enough information to
lend against them.
“Typically a community bank does not have a department set aside to do that,” says David Dunbar, the
chairman and chief executive at Synovus Bank in St. Petersburg, Fla., a member of Synovus Financial
Corp.’s regional-bank system.
For a bank customer to qualify for a receivables-based credit line, it generally would need to offer full,
audited financial statements, which most small businesses don’t have. Indeed, when FTrans first
presented the system to Synovus bankers about two years ago, a few executives voiced concerns about
whether FTrans would be able to sufficiently monitor invoices to make sure they were real, says Mr.
Dunbar. So far, he says, there have been no major problems.
The bank, in an attempt to branch out from real-estate lending, is now aggressively pitching FTransfacilitated receivables lending to new and existing clients, many of whom wouldn’t qualify for other types of
commercial loans, Mr. Dunbar says.
Today, a year and a half since Synovus first implemented the FTrans system, more than three dozen
clients from the bank’s three commercial offices are using it. The bank has a right to choose how much of
each invoice it is willing to advance—maybe 90% for a well-known retailer but only 70% for a lesser-known
company that seems like a greater risk. Borrowers typically pay between 1% and 3% on each transaction,
Mr. Dunbar says. The bank and FTrans each take a chunk of that.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204475004574126842665466408#printMode

2/4

8/1/2014

Borrowing Against Receivables Gets Cheaper, Easier - WSJ

FTrans also administers a handful of loans on its own. That’s the case for Billy Teagle, president of Atlantabased retail-merchandising company Rocket Retail Merchandising LLC. In October, Mr. Teagle went to his
bank to ask for a $300,000 line of credit to fund a geographic expansion.
“They wouldn’t give me the time of day, despite having four years of profits,” Mr. Teagle recalls.
Mr. Teagle called FTrans, and they set up a line of credit, secured by receivables, with a $300,000 limit. He
estimates that he’s financing as much as $75,000 each week through FTrans, inputting invoices into the
FTrans system when he bills clients and borrowing against them until his customers pay. Mr. Teagle says
he had a problem when a client paid a $25,000 bill 30 days late and he was forced to pay the interest on the
loan for the extra time. If multiple customers did that at the same time, it would be a problem. So far,
though, that has happened only once.

Getting Big-Company Rates
With buyers anxious to extend payment terms in tough times, some are turning to Atlanta’s PrimeRevenue
Inc., a supply-chain finance company. PrimeRevenue works with large companies—from car makers to
retailers—that want a few extra days to pay their hundreds of small suppliers. Through a network of bank
partners, PrimeRevenue will advance the money owed to the small suppliers, at an interest rate that’s
based on the credit standing of the bigger buyer company—generally a single-digit annual rate,
PrimeRevenue says. PrimeRevenue’s fee is wrapped into that rate; the rest of it goes to the banks that
provide the financing. Suppliers can log into the program, look at their future-dated receivables and either
elect to wait for the buyer to pay the bill, or click a button to get an advance.
Small suppliers can’t just ask to be in the program, however. The bigger buyer company has to initiate the
system and pay a fee to participate. Today, PrimeRevenue services 40 big global companies or units of
those companies, up from about 30 early last year.
For small suppliers, the program offers an opportunity to land financing at rates based on the credit quality
of their big customers, instead of the higher rates generally offered to smaller companies. When a big
industrial customer told executives at metal-stamping company Universal Metal Products about
PrimeRevenue, “our initial reaction was skeptical, because whenever you hear of this type of thing you think
of some kind of back-room factoring house,” says John Rapacki, the Wickliffe, Ohio, company’s controller.
But the rate was much lower than a factor, and Mr. Rapacki liked the ability to use the system without a
fixed commitment. (Universal Metal Products’ large customer doesn’t want to be named; some
participating companies would rather not admit they are extending payment terms.)
The ability to pick and choose when to use the system for financing has proved critical in recent months as
rates have marched higher amid uncertainty in capital markets, Mr. Rapacki says. At the beginning of 2008,
the interest rate on his receivables was around 3%, and Universal Metal Products would regularly take
advances on payment. These days, it is closer to 10%, so the company rarely taps into the financing.
--Ms. Covel is a staff reporter of The Wall Street Journal in Chicago. She can be reached at
[email protected].

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204475004574126842665466408#printMode

3/4

8/1/2014

Borrowing Against Receivables Gets Cheaper, Easier - WSJ

Copyright 2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by
copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052970204475004574126842665466408#printMode

4/4

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close