Chris IKORCC Prevailing Wage Presentation

Published on June 2016 | Categories: Types, Brochures | Downloads: 38 | Comments: 0 | Views: 194
of 31
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

Prevailing
 Wage
 
 
And
 Applications
 to
 Indiana’s
 
 
Common
 Construction
 Wage

Prevailing
 Wage
 Laws
 Among
 Oldest
 Labor
 
Market
 Regulations
• 1868
 8-­‐Hour
 Day
 Law
 prevailing
 wage
 provision
 
• 1891
 Kansas
 prevailing
 wage
 law
 on
 public
 works
 
• 1931
 Davis
 Bacon
 Act
 
– Senator
 John
 Davis
 (Republican—PA)
 
– Rep.
 Robert
 Bacon
 (Republican—NY)
 
– President
 Herbert
 Hoover
 (Republican
 IA)
 

• 1935
 Indiana
 prevailing
 wage
 law
 (now
 Common
 
Construction
 Law)
 
– Public
 jobs
 now
 >$350,000
 total
 construction
 cost
2

Workers
 Benefit
 from
 Prevailing
 Wages
Higher
 wages

Personal
 and
 family
 
health
 insurance

Pension
 coverage

Workers
 comp
 
&
 
unemployment
 
insurance
 
coverage

3

As
 Wages
 Rise,
 Contractors
 Substitute
 Capital
 
for
 Labor
Source:
 US
 Census
 of
 Construction,
 2002
$150,000

$140,000

Value added per construction worker

Rented machinery per worker

$4,000

$3,000

$2,000

R Sq Linear = 0.193

$1,000

$130,000

$120,000

$110,000

$100,000

$90,000

R Sq Linear = 0.261

$80,000
$25,000.00

$30,000.00

$35,000.00

$40,000.00

$45,000.00

Average construction worker income

Higher
 wages
 lead
 to
 more
 
machinery
 per
 worker
 in
 construction

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

Rented machinery per worker

More
 machinery
 per
 worker
 leads
 to
 
higher
 value
 added
 per
 worker

4

High-­‐wage,
 capital
 intensive
 construction
 raises
 
labor
 productivity
Shovels
 
vs.
 
Backhoe

Wheel-­‐
barrow
 
vs.
 
Cement
 
truck

5

High
 Wage
 Industries
 Need
 High
 Wage
 
Construction
University
 of
 Iowa
 Research
 Park
 
BioVentures
 Center

World
 Class
 Competitive
 Industries
 
Require
 World
 Class
 Infrastructure




Local
 construction
 capabilities
 enable
 or
 
constrain
 the
 industries
 which
 rely
 on
 
modern
 infrastructure
 
US
 Biotechnology
 Clusters
 
Prevailing
 wage
 law
 states:
 




Seattle,
 USA

San
 Francisco,
 USA

Los
 Angeles,
 USA

San
 Diego,
 USA

Minneapolis/St.
 Paul/Rochester
 USA

Austin,
 USA

Boston,
 USA

New
 York/New
 Jersey,
 USA

Philadelphia,
 USA

Baltimore/Washington,
 DC,
 USA
 

No
 law
 states
 


Research
 Triangle
 NC,
 USA
 


http://www.mbbnet.umn.edu/scmap/
biotechmap.html

Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

6

Taxpayers
 Benefit
 from
 PW
 Benefits
• Construction
 workers
 are
 5-­‐7%
 of
 labor
 force
 
– When
 construction
 workers
 get
 health
 insurance,
 
less
 pressure
 on
 public
 health
 system
 
– When
 construction
 workers
 get
 pensions,
 less
 
pressure
 on
 public
 care
 for
 the
 elderly
 
– When
 contractors
 pay
 into
 workers
 comp
 &
 
unemployment
 system,
 funds
 remain
 viable

7

Las
 Vegas
 Study
 Shows
 Nonunion
 Construction
 
Workers
 Rely
 on
 Public
 Hospitals
• All
 uncompensated
 [health]
 care
 costs
 [in
 Clark
 
county]
 attributable
 to
 [uninsured]
 employed
 
construction
 workers
 over
 the
 period
 
amounted
 to
 $6.3
 million
 and
 the
 total
 cost
 of
 
uncompensated
 care
 to
 the
 employed
 and
 
their
 dependents
 was
 over
 $37
 million
 for
 the
 
years
 1998-­‐2000.
 
– Jeff
 Waddoups
 of
 the
 University
 of
 Nevada
 at
 Las
 Vegas

8

Kansas
 repeals
 prevailing
 wage,
 1987

apprenticeship
 training
 falls
 afterward
• After
 4
 years,
 construction
 apprenticeship
 training
 
falls
 by
 38%.
 
• Minority
 apprenticeship
 falls
 by
 54%.
 
• Open
 shop
 contractors
 accounted
 for
 only
 12%
 of
 
apprentices
 being
 trained.
 
• Open
 shop
 share
 of
 market
 grows
 after
 repeal,
 
apprenticeship
 training
 plummets.
Source:
 Peter
 Philips,
 “Kansas
 and
 Prevailing
 Wage
 
Legislation”,
 University
 of
 Utah,
 February
 1998.
 

Do
 Prevailing
 Wages
 Protect
 Local
 Workers?
 
The
 Katrina
 Suspension:
• On
 September
 7,
 2005,
 less
 
than
 two
 weeks
 after
 
Hurricane
 Katrina,
 President
 
Bush
 suspended
 the
 Davis
 
Bacon
 Act.
 
• Contractors
 were
 now
 free
 
to
 pay
 any
 wage
 above
 the
 
federal
 minimum
 of
 $5.25
 
for
 workers
 to
 rebuild
 from
 
the
 devastation.
 
• What
 happened?
 
 

10

Influx
 of
 Out-­‐of-­‐State
 Workers

Wages
 Drop
• Immigrant
 workers
 rile
 New
 Orleans;
 Rules
 shelved,
 crews
 
labor
 for
 meager
 pay
 
 

– Mary
 Lou
 Pickel,
 The
 Atlanta
 Journal-­‐Constitution,
 October
 19,
 2005
 
Section:
 News,
 p.
 1A.
 
 

• New
 Orleans
 rebuilds
 as
 tensions
 rise;
 Influx
 of
 Latino
 workers
 
has
 local
 businesses
 and
 contractors
 feeling
 left
 out,
 
 
– Kelly
 Brewington,
 The
 Baltimore
 Sun,
 October
 14,
 2005
 Section:
 
Telegraph,
 p.
 1A;
 
 

• Nuevo
 Orleans?
 An
 influx
 of
 Hispanic
 workers
 in
 the
 wake
 of
 
Hurricane
 Katrina
 has
 some
 officials
 wondering
 why
 locals
 
aren’t
 on
 the
 front
 line
 of
 recovery,
 
 
– James
 Varney,
 Times-­‐Picayune,
 October
 18,
 2005
 ,
 New
 Orleans,
 
Section:
 National,
 p.
 1;
 

11

Times
 -­‐Picayune
 Editorialize
 Against
 D-­‐B
 
Suspension
• [W]e
 are
 already
 moving
 quickly
 and
 boldly
 in
 the
 wrong
 
direction….[Y]ou
 can
 hardly
 entice
 [our
 citizens]
 back
 if
 you’re
 
only
 willing
 to
 pay
 poverty
 wages.
 
 But
 in
 the
 wake
 of
 the
 
disaster,
 President
 Bush
 suspended
 the
 Davis-­‐Bacon
 Act….In
 
essence,
 there’s
 no
 ceiling
 preventing
 sky-­‐high
 profits
 for
 these
 
[out-­‐of-­‐state]
 contractors
 and
 not
 much
 of
 a
 floor
 to
 ensure
 
that
 wages
 to
 workers
 are
 not
 abysmally
 low.
 
 There
 is
 an
 
intelligent
 way
 to
 rebuild
 our
 city.
 This,
 however,
 isn’t
 it.”
 
– New
 Orleans
 Times-­‐Picayune
 editorial
 under
 the
 headline—“Rebuilding
 
effort
 should
 be
 localized”:
 
• Lolis
 Eric
 Elie,
 Times
 -­‐Picayune,
 New
 Orleans,
 Section:
 Metro,
 p.
 B1
 

• On
 October
 26,
 2005,
 after
 pressure
 from
 both
 
Democrats
 and
 Republicans,
 Bush
 rescinded
 his
 
emergency
 order
 and
 restored
 the
 prevailing
 wage
 
requirement.
12

A
 Natural
 Experiment
 





1996
 Kentucky
 applied
 PWs
 to
 schools
 
1997
 Ohio
 eliminated
 PWs
 on
 schools
 
1994
 Michigan
 suspended
 PWs
 on
 schools
 
1997
 Michigan
 re-­‐implemented
 PWs
 on
 schools
Kentucky

No Law

Ohio

Law

Michigan

Law
1991.0

1993.5

Law

No Law

No Law

Law

1996.0

1998.5

2001.0

Natural
 Experiment
 of
 the
 Effects
 of
 Prevailing
 Wages
 on
 Costs

13

No
 Meaningful
 or
 Statistically
 Significant
 
Difference
 in
 Costs
Looking
 at
 all
 391
 schools—MI,
 OH,
 KY
a
1
2
3 No Law
4 Law
5 t-test
Statistically
Significant
6 Difference?

b
Mean
$96
$98
-0.76

New Public Schools
Real (Inflation Adjusted) Square Foot Cost
c
d
e
f
g
Rural Schools
Urban Schools
Standard Deviation Number Mean Standard Deviation Number
$26
161 $114
$36
40
$24
104 $114
$34
86
0.05

No

No

14

Simply Tracking Kentucky & Ohio
Finds No Cost Savings
Median Cost per Square Foot of New Elementary Schools
110
Ohio Eliminates Law
Kentucky Adds Law

Cost per Sq Foot

83

Kentucky
Ohio
55
Period II:
Kentucky Has Law
Period I:
Ohio Has Law

28

0
1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

“Show me the money!”
Kentucky implemented; Ohio repealed

!15

Results Confirmed in Nation-Wide Study
• Looking at over 4000 new schools built in all
states over the same period
– No practical or statistically significant cost savings
associated with prevailing wage law repeals
– Considerable savings found when schools built during
construction downturns
– Breaking ground in winter raised costs
!
!

• Hamid Azari-Rad, Peter Philips, and Mark Prus, “Making Hay
When It Rains: The Effect Prevailing Wage Regulations, Scale
Economies, Seasonal, Cyclical And Local Business Patterns
Have On School Construction Costs,” Journal of Education
Finance, 27 (SPRING 2002). 997-1012 .
!16

Again
 NO
 statistically
 Significant
 Difference
 in
 
Square
 Ft.
 Costs
$90
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
Law

No Law
Elementary

Middle School

IA
High School

Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

17

Prevailing
 Wage
 Laws
 &
 
Construction
 Productivity
More
 skilled
 workers
 are
 safer,
 work
 
more
 efficiently
 and
 deliver
 a
 better
 
producty
Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

18

Old
 Capitol
 in
 Iowa
 City
 

awarded
 to
 out-­‐of-­‐state
 firm
• August,
 2001,
 Enviro
 
Safe
 Air
 from
 South
 
Dakota
 (a
 non-­‐prevailing
 
wage
 law
 state),
 as
 the
 
low
 bidder
 at
 $105,876
 
began
 work
 on
 asbestos
 
removal
 

19

No
 background
 check
 had
 been
 done
 on
 
Enviro
 Safe
 Air
 




A
 background
 check
 would
 have
 
revealed
 that
 Enviro
 Safe
 Air
 had
 
received
 11
 state
 code
 violations
 for
 
the
 way
 it
 removed
 asbestos
 in
 the
 
previous
 ten
 years
 having
 paid
 
$10,000
 in
 fines.
 
 
 
In
 May,
 prior
 to
 receiving
 the
 Old
 
Cap
 contract,
 Enviro
 Safe
 Air
 had
 
settled
 a
 lawsuit
 out-­‐of-­‐court
 over
 
asbestos
 removal
 violations.
 

– Associated
 Press,
 State
 and
 Local
 Wire,
 
“Repairs
 to
 Old
 Capitol
 escalate
 to
 
more
 than
 $5
 million,”
 November
 30,
 
2001.

20

Falling
 Behind,
 Orders
 Workers
 to
 Remove
 
Paint
 &
 Asbestos
 with
 Heat
 Guns
 &
 Torches
• Fritz
 Miller
 of
 Renaissance
 
Restoration
 of
 Illinois
 (a
 
prevailing
 wage
 law
 state)
 wrote
 
an
 email
 to
 Al
 Bawden,
 a
 project
 
manager:
 
• “I
 have
 personally
 witnessed
 
Enviro
 Safe
 personnel
 using
 open
 
flame
 torches
 to
 remove
 paint
 
on
 the
 cupola.
 
 This
 is
 an
 unsafe
 
method
 of
 removal,
 and
 we
 have
 
great
 worry
 that
 a
 catastrophic
 
fire
 will
 result
 from
 this
 practice.”
 
 
– Associated
 Press,
 State
 and
 Local
 
Wire,
 “Ill-­‐fated
 Old
 Capitol
 in
 Iowa
 
City
 was
 plagued
 with
 problems
 
from
 the
 beginning,
 a
 review
 of
 
documents
 related
 to
 the
 project
 
shows,”
 January
 20,
 2002.

21

$100k
 Job
 Costs
 $5
 Million


Drew
 Ives
 director
 of
 the
 University
 of
 Iowa
 
Facilities
 Services:
 "The
 workers
 probably
 had
 
a
 lot
 of
 pressure
 from
 the
 home
 office
 to
 pull
 
off
 the
 job
 because
 it
 was
 costing
 them
 to
 
have
 people
 there."
 
 
 




Indeed,
 OSHA
 alleged
 that
 Enviro
 Safe
 Air
 
instructed
 workers
 to
 use
 heat
 to
 remove
 
material
 containing
 asbestos.
 
 This
 is
 not
 only
 
a
 fire
 hazard.
 




Associated
 Press,
 State
 and
 Local
 Wire,
 “Ill-­‐fated
 
Old
 Capitol
 in
 Iowa
 City
 was
 plagued
 with
 
problems
 from
 the
 beginning,
 a
 review
 of
 
documents
 related
 to
 the
 project
 shows,”
 
January
 20,
 2002.
 

Associated
 Press,
 State
 and
 Local
 Wire,
 
 
“Asbestos
 removal
 company
 faces
 more
 
citations,”
 February
 28,
 2002.
 
 

“at
 their
 own
 admission
 (has)
 no
 experience
 
removing
 paint
 coatings
 and
 no
 experience
 
working
 on
 historic
 structures.”
 
 


Terry
 Cole,
 president
 of
 Renaissance
 
Restoration
 


Associated
 Press,
 State
 and
 Local
 Wire,
 “Repairs
 
to
 Old
 Capitol
 escalate
 to
 more
 than
 $5
 million,”
 
November
 30,
 2001.
 

22

Labor
 Brokers
 rent
 low-­‐wage
 workers
• “Raiteros”
 drive
 groups
 of
 
low-­‐wage
 workers
 for
 a
 fee
 
• Mostly
 illegal
 immigrant
 
• Brokers
 subcontracted
 by
 
temp
 agencies
 contracted
 to
 
company.
 
 Employees
 
misclassified
 as
 independent
 
contractors
“Major
 American
 Companies
 Benefit
 From
 
Undocumented
 Workers”
 -­‐
 ProPublica/
Marketplace,
 April
 2013
23

Labor brokers cut costs, corners: 

Fast-growing firms exploit immigrants to feed
construction industry
Nobles, who initially defended his $6 million a year company, said he
is rethinking many of his practices as the result of inquiries by The
Post and conversations with his lawyers. But, he said, in an industry
that depends on undocumented immigrants for much of its labor,
abuses will continue because they are profitable.
“You don’t have to worry about workman’s comp payments with
Mexicans because they are afraid to go to the hospital. They’re not
going to file a big claim and sue you like the Americans are. That’s
what this boils down to,” Nobles said. “We have these people
intimidated.”
Labor brokers cut costs, corners: Fast-growing firms exploit immigrants to feed construction industry, Denver Post, February 16, 2003

Investigators
 report
 growing
 trends

undermining
 a
 quality
 workforce
“Brokers
 often
 can
 evade
 scrutiny
 on
 
big
 construction
 sites,
 where
 a
 builder
 
typically
 has
 numerous
 
subcontractors,
 each
 of
 whom
 may
 —
 
unbeknownst
 to
 the
 contractor
 —
 
farm
 out
 parts
 of
 a
 job
 to
 still
 other
 
subcontractors.
 That
 structure
 
naturally
 pushes
 down
 —
 and
 can
 
intentionally
 be
 used
 to
 obscure
 —
 
responsibility
 for
 wages,
 taxes
 and
 
liability.”
“Home-­‐Building
 Boom
 Relies
 on
 
Illegal
 Workers”
 –
 Seattle
 Times,
 
September
 17,
 2006

“Companies
 that
 provide
 mostly
 illegal
 
immigrant
 laborers
 to
 commercial
 
building
 sites
 nationwide
 are
 thriving
 
even
 as
 they
 flout
 the
 country's
 most
 
basic
 labor
 laws....
 In
 a
 growing
 number
 
of
 states,
 the
 companies
 dominate
 
building
 specialties
 such
 as
 
drywall
 installation,
 one
 of
 the
 dirtiest
 
jobs
 in
 commercial
 
construction.”

“Labor
 Brokers
 Cut
 Costs,
 Corners”
 -­‐
 
Denver
 Post,
 February
 16,
 2003

25

Prevailing
 Wage
 Laws
 Stop
 Tax
 Avoidance
 
Contractor
 Strategies


Independent Contractors as a Percent
of Employees in Construction
50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%

46%

46%
41%

OMAHA
 (AP)
 -­‐-­‐
 Miguel
 is
 paid
 by
 the
 hour.
 
 He
 
is
 told
 when
 to
 start
 and
 finish
 his
 workday,
 
when
 to
 take
 breaks
 and
 what
 to
 do
 on
 his
 
shift.
 
 He
 didn't
 bid
 for
 the
 job
 of
 hanging
 
drywall,
 and
 he
 doesn't
 risk
 profit
 or
 loss.
 
 He
 
wears
 a
 red
 hard
 hat
 bearing
 the
 "E
 &
 K"
 
insignia
 of
 an
 Omaha
 contractor,
 Eliason
 &
 
Knuth
 Drywall
 Co.
 He
 cashes
 a
 paycheck
 cut
 by
 
a
 second
 company,
 an
 Atlanta-­‐based
 labor
 
broker
 called
 Eagle
 Managed
 Subcontractors.
 
 
By
 all
 appearances,
 Miguel
 is
 somebody's
 
employee.
 
 Yet
 before
 he
 could
 work
 on
 the
 
new
 Omaha
 convention
 center,
 Miguel,
 as
 
we're
 calling
 him,
 had
 to
 sign
 a
 contract
 
declaring
 himself
 an
 independent
 
subcontractor.
 


Iowa

18 Other No-Law States

Prevailing Wage Law
States

5%
 of
 Iowa’s
 construction
 labor
 force
 
would
 have
 payroll
 taxes
 paid
 on
 them
 
with
 prevailing
 wage
 regulations

Steve
 Jordon,
 Cindy
 Gonzalez,
 “When
 a
 worker
 
is
 not
 an
 employee
 When
 illegal
 immigrants
 are
 
classified
 as
 subcontractors,
 taxes
 tend
 to
 
disappear.
 Who's
 the
 boss?”
 Omaha
 World
 
Herald
 (Nebraska),
 
 


April
 27,
 2003
 NEWS;
 p.
 1A.

Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

26

• Contractors
 get
 pushed
 out
 of
 the
 market
 
• no
 government
 oversight
 once
 CW
 is
 
eliminated
 
• Increase
 in
 cash
 pay
 and
 1099
 abuse
 
• Legitimate
 NU
 contractors
 get
 hurt
 too
 

27

Health
 Insurance
Shifts
 costs
 off
 the
 taxpayer

Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

28

The
 distribution
 of
 health
 insurance
 among
 
union
 and
 nonunion
 construction
 workers
Figure5. Union/nonunion & Health Insrance in the Construction Industry
50
45
40

percentage

35
30
nonunion
union

25
20
15
10
5
0
No HI

Private purchase

spouse only

none

part

all

categories

Peter
 Philips,
 Professor
 and
 Chair,
 Economics
 
Dept,
 Univ.
 of
 Utah

29

The
 Next
 Step
 is
 to
 Act
• Advocate
 
 

– Prevent
 opponents
 from
 pushing
 further
 
– Stop
 piecemeal
 repeal
 

!

• Contact
 your
 elected
 officials
 
 

– let
 them
 know
 you
 support
 a
 common
 construction
 wage
 for
 
the
 sake
 of
 the
 industry
 
– Important
 to
 maintain
 a
 quality
 workforce
 

!
• Oppose
 incremental
 weakening,
 like
 raising
 the
 
threshold
 where
 common
 construction
 wage
 kicks
 in
 
– Already
 raised
 twice
 in
 past
 two
 years
 
– $150,000
 -­‐-­‐>
 $250,000
 -­‐-­‐>
 $350,000

Questions?

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close