306 FIFTH AVE.
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10001
(212) 279-8300
Ask for: Bola Ramanathan
10 • CITY LIMITS
A City Limits Forum
Breaking New Ground
How the New Mayor Can Help Solve
. the City's Housing Crisis
I
n the city that David Dinkins is about to take over, the housing crisis in an in-
escapable fact of life for almost every resident. Luxury towers may continue to
rise in a few exclusive neighborhoods, but residents of most communities
struggle to find affordable housing. The wait for a public housing unit hovers near
20 years, housing court serves as an unofficial eviction mill and the number of
homeless people living in shelters, shacks and subways increases daily.
At first glance, the city appears to be taking a step in the right direction with its
10-year, $5.1 billion housing plan. Yet critics are raising serious questions about
how and where the money is being spent. Some say that in neighborhoods like the
Lower East Side and Clinton, subsidies for middle income housing will spur gentri-
fication and displacement. Others are concerned that parts of Harlem and the South
Bronx are receiving so many low income families that the city is recreating ghettos.
What's a new mayor to do? Five members of City Limits' board of directors
gathered the day after the election with a moderator to encourage Mayor-elect
Dinkins to break new ground and make po] LCY choices that truly encourage commu-
nity development. Here's an edited version oftheir comments, as well as advice from
grassroots activists from across the city.
HAROLD DERIENZO, Moderator
Executive Director, Consumer-Farmer Foundation, which
funds innovative low income housing efforts. Founding
member, Banana Kelly Community Improvement Asso-
ciation in the South Bronx.
HARRIET COHEN
Director of Housing, Community Service Society. For-
mer member, Rent Guidelines Board. Former director,
NY Neighborhood Anti-Arson Center.
ANDREW REICHER
Executive Director, Urban Homesteading Assistance
Board, which provides technical assistance to tenants
taking control of city-owned buildings. President, Green
Guerillas community gardening association.
RICHARD RIVERA
Attorney, Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education
Fund. Chairman, East Harlem Revolving Loan Fund.
Board member, East Harlem Land Trust and Southwest
Bronx Community Coordinating Council.
TOM ROBBINS
Journalist, former editor of City Limits.
JAY SMALL
Executive Director, Flatbush East Community Develop-
ment Corporation, which provides tenant protection,
housing preservation, commercial revitalization and
youth employment programs. Vice president, Associa-
tion for Neighborhood and Housing Development.
GOALS
ANDREW REICHER: What we're looking for from the
mayor is leadership in pushing longer range visions
rather than the short-term, sell-it-now, get some politi-
cal mileage approach of selling to devel-
opers. The current mayor has said that
he's concerned that Dinkins, Messinger
and Holtzman ... will stop development.
Maybe that's true, but that's how we paid
our way to our current prosperity-plus-
crisis. We're looking for leadership to (ad-
vocate) the production of affordable hous-
ing over the long term and to hold the
forces at bay that don't support that goal.
It's like energy conservation, it may not be
sexy but it saves money in the long run.
HARRIET COHEN: I think the vision of
City Limits is an inclusionary New York.
What we've seen in the last many years is
a city that's become polarized, a lot of
people have been pushed out or shipped
out of the city, people are not welcome.
We're trying to create communities where
people can live, feel safe, have services and support to
grow, live and flourish.
REICHER: And we want the new administration to see
community-based efforts as an important resource.
December 1989 • 11
HARRY DERIENZO: There's a whole neighborhood-
based infrastructure that was set up. A lot of the worst
of the city's problems-the crack problem, other prob-
lems-have to be solved through locally based organiza-
tions that address those concerns and provide positive
alternatives.
TOM ROBBINS: We're really looking for the end of the
time when neighborhoods are seen as the opponent as
opposed to the partner.
NOT FOR SALE
COHEN: City-owned property .. .is a resource and you
have to capture it to help solve the housing and home-
lessness crisis.
JAY SMALL: Is there any problem saying we're against
reprivatization?
RICHARD RIVERA: That city-owned land should not be
sold to for-profit developers?
REICHER: And city-owned vacant and occupied build-
ings.
A CHORUS OF VOICES: No POMP (the Private Owner-
ship Management Program).
ROBBINS: Would you really say that? Presumably there
are a few decent developers that can make the program
work.
DERIENZO: What is your goal? That really is the issue.
The goal in the beginning was that the city had to design
programs to get these buildings out of public ownership
(to qualify for federal community development funds.)
ROBBINS: My goal would be long-term affordability.
DERIENZO: You can't ensure long-term affordability
when you have a history of tenant incomes going in one
path and rents going on another path. It's going to
12 • CITY UMITS
converge at some point and you're going to have a crisis.
REICHER: I don't think that anyone would deny that
there are private developers who could do rehab for the
city or do management for non-privately owned build-
ings. But to put them (city-owned buildings) back into
a situation pitting low income residents, whose only
protection would be rent stabilization, against private
owners and their rightful goal to make money, could put
us back into a drastic situation for the community.
DERIENZO: You get back to the situation of churning
ownership. I would say no privatization at all unless
there was some kind of permanent affordability, resale
restrictions and full capitalization.
RIVERA: Since in the next four or five years the buy-out
options on a lot of federally subsidized projects will be
coming up, it becomes are even more important to stabi-
lize the only resources that are available in New York.
ROBBINS: It's not clear to me that you want to throw out
the private sector entirely as some kind of vehicle to do
that.
REICHER: To add profit and the motivation to serve the
highest income possible ... (private ownership) just
doesn't make sense to me when you don't have adequate
resources to assure permanent affordability.
RIVERA: So we've now decided the private sector should
not own it. Who should manage it?
REICHER: There's private, nonprofit managers, commu-
nity groups, tenant self-management, the housing au-
thority if they're interested. There's potential for devel-
oping nonprofit co-ops to do management.
COHEN: We have to work out ways to work with the
good private managers that are out there.
REICHER: But I think we're wise enough to see that
whatever we do now isn't necessarily going to solve the
problem and we're still going to need these units 15, 20,
50 years from now and hopefully we won't have a
situation where the City of New York doesn't have the
resource of owning this real estate. Otherwise, we'll be
facing what every other city in the nation faces, which is
first you have to buy a regular unit from the market at
$85,000 or $100,000 and then you have to rehab it. It's
crazy to give away what we've got only to face that
situation when we haven't solved the problem. So to put
expiring use restrictions (as in the Vacant Building Pro-
gram, under which private developers are buying and
renovating city-owned buildings) just doesn't make any
sense. It's so short sighted and it doesn't even make
sense in the short term.
SAVING HOMES AND TENANTS
COHEN: I think we have to do much more
in terms of code enforcement, housing
court and rent regulations. That's an
important part of the whole picture. The
city could take a more aggressive role in
terms of lobbying for more protections.
SMALL: In terms of protection, commu-
nity consultants (nonprofit organizations
providing, among other things, tenant pro-
tection and housing preservation assis-
tance) got a big cut in the city budget.
Basically they' re cutting the only money
appropriated from the expense budget that
allows non profits to exist.
ROBBINS: What about the idea of having
two agencies? We have a stepchild that's
run by the development side and is given
short shrift. (The Department of) Housing
Preservation and Development is basi-
cally a development office at this point.
COHEN: I think it would depend on how
it was structured. Perhaps two equal divi-
sions under the same roof. The housing
produced needs to be inspected or en-
forced by the other side.
REICHER: What about the property management divi-
sion? Right now we have preservation, which is the
stepchild, then we have this other unrecognized entity.
I think you've got to figure out that each is an important
part of any housing program.
COHEN: I think one of the problems is image. Housing
development is seen as new and sexy and housing
preservation is seen as negative; inspecting, enforcing
and regulating are things that are not as high profile.
SUBSIDIES FOR WHOM?
RIVERA: If I had to choose where to put
my money, I'd put it where people have
the emergency: people who are poor, can't
afford their housing and are dispropor-
tionately black or Latino and other Third
World people. The argument that is al-
ways used is that without subsidies you
can't build middle income housing. But
in a bad situation where you have limited
resources you can't continue to build
market rate housing that people can afford
on their own. Certainly you shouldn't
subsidize housing for people who earn
above $53,000, which is what's happen-
ing in Tibbett Gardens and Seward Park.
DERIENZO: One of the things I found
most interesting about "Missing the Mark"
(the report by the Association for Neigh-
borhood and Housing Development on
the city's 10-year, $5.1 billion housing
plan) was the breakdown between rents
and housing availability (using the state's
definition of a vacancy rate below 5 per-
cent as a housing emergency). One of the things that
might grow out of that is that any direct public subsidy
should go to populations that are housing poor. To do
that would cut off everyone that makes more than $32,000
a year. The approach now is don't worry about the
vacancy rate; all we have to do is increase the supply of
housing and let it trickle down and the housing crisis
will be solved that way.
ROBBINS: I believe the City Limits board thinks there
has to be a percentage of homeless housing in all city
projects.
December 1989 • 13
DERIENZO: That addresses not just part of the housing
need but also one of the complaints the Housing Justice
Campaign made about the way the city has developed
homeless housing.
ROBBINS: I looked into this a little last
winter ... trying to find out why they carne
up with different rules for (what per-
centage of homeless families move into)
community group projects like LISC
(Local Initiatives Support Corporation)
and then the Vacant Buildings Program.
(Housing Commissioner) Biderman said
the owners said forget it, we'll never take
10 percent (of apartments reserved for
the homeless). It'll drive away the people
we're trying to attract. It'll make it unaf-
fordable. But then I spoke to the people
involved in financing and building in
the Vacant Buildings Program and they
said it had never been raised. They said,
in fact, it would probably be doable under
certain circumstances. I think that's one
of the things they (the Koch administra-
tion) have thrown out because they don't
want to do it or in their head it won't
work, so we're not even challenging the
private developers to do it.
ALL LINKED UP
RIVERA: To mean anything linkage has to first look at
the community. There are many communities that have
already defined their own linkage principles. In East
Harlem the linkage principle has been that with every
market rate or middle income unit that is produced, you
14 • CITY LIMITS
have to have one low and one moderate (income unit) as
defined by tlile incomes of that community.
DERIENZO: That's the same definition the Lower East
Side gives to the cross-subsidy plan.
COHEN: His (Dinkins') program is related
to the idea that if you build office space
then you have to build a certain number of
square feet of low income housing.
RIVERA: I'm talking about the principle
of linkage as the city is using it with city-
owned property and with developers who
do development under the lO-year plan.
ROBBINS: Like the Real Estate Board' s
project for East Harlem.
RIVERA: That's right.
munity Board 3 in the Bronx basically our job was to
organize and reconcile all the community reports, the
uptown, downtown and borough stuff. It's not very
difficult to do. What that prevents is what the Koch
ARne Pasmanlck
Scllaal far Hallill Orpllzen
Co_IRy Tral.ll ..... Rllalrce ent.
"The following are a few steps we
should see in a new administration.
One-reform the Rent Guidelines
Board. This mayorally-appointed
board has long been a rubber stamp
for rent increases for New York City's
900,000 rent stabilized households.
ROBBINS: You would say that could go
ahead but it has to generate a certain
number of (lower income) units?
Use subpoena power to provide data on landlord income.
profit and expenses and break tradition by appointing public
members who represent the public. not the banking and real
estate industry.
RIVERA: I would like to see some tie be-
tween the production of low and moder-
ate income units and the speed with which
(developers) go ahead with middle in-
come or market rate development.
DERIENZO: Your assumption seems to be
that you first have to attract the private
sector to take the lead and then link any
public benefit for lower income popula-
tions to that production.
"Two-earmark the substantial funds collected in fiscal
year 1989 by Housing Preservation and Development's
housing litigation bureau from housing court settlements
and judgements to supplement the grossly inadequate
supply of inspectors. Provide for increased inspections.
repairs and services for non-regulated tenants in city owned
buildings.
"Three-fight for housing court reform and state legisla-
tion to reform the laws governing Major Capital Improve-
ment rent increases and co-op and condo conversions."
(Photo by Isa Brito)
RIVERA: If they are going to use city-
owned property to develop market rate
housing, the only way it can conscionably
and productively happen is if you tie that to the devel-
opment oflow and moderate income housing that serves
the people in those communities.
COMMUNITY PLANNING
COHEN: One thing we haven' t talked about is the whole
notion of planning. That's one of our main criticisms of
the lO-year plan. It wasn't based on any kind of a needs
assessment.
SMALL: But what's the planning process? We' re saying
the ideal is economically and racially integrated hous-
ing in all the communities, but it 's not going to happen
spontaneously. There has to be some kind of a central
plan, but there also has to be guidelines so the local
communities can have input.
DERIENZO: When we did the 197a plan (a community-
initiated plan as outlined in the City Charter) for Com-
administration called strategic planning, when they just
went ahead and dumped things, then built in a day-care
center and later they found out there was one around the
corner. You don't take stock of local resources unless
the plan is generated locally and you don't take a city-
wide perspective unless its mandated through a central
authority in terms of what communities should do to
share burdens.
SMALL: There's a layer between the citywide and the
local and that' s the borough level, which hasn't really
operated. Under the new charter it would be even more
problematic. Borough planning is going to have to play
a very important role-that's where a lot of the struggle
among the communities in a borough is going to take
place.
RIVERA: No one seems to be talking about homeowner-
ship opportunities for the poor. There's a model in the
South Bronx, where Don Sakano (of the Archdiocese of
New York) is building two-family homes for families
December 1989 • 15
earning between $17-23,000 and turning (the housing)
into co-ops. If we' re talking about ways to stabilize
neighborhoods, homeownership is one way to do that.
RIVERA: If there's a concrete issue (Dinkins) wants to
work on in the first three months, he can sure work hard
on the anti-warehousing legislation. I'd like to see him
take a aggressive public stand on that. 0
SIGNALS
ROBBINS: I remember Ed Koch de-
fining his housing policy within six
months of taking office. He said: If
you can't afford it move out. As for
people in city-owned housing, he
said if they're not paying the rent,
evict them. We're looking for the
new administration to recognize that
most people have no place to move
and most people can't afford the rent.
And if they' re evicted it's going to
cost you more later and that we've
got to come up with solutions for
these things in an equitable way.
We' re talking about economic inte-
gration, planning, (getting rid of)
certain programs which are throw-
ing valuable stock away to the pri-
vate sector. Those things ought to be
the bottom line.
SUPPORT SERVICES FOR NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
Writing 0 Reports 0 Proposals 0 Newsletters 0 Manuals 0 Program
Description and Justification 0 Procedures 0 Training Materials
Research and Evaluation 0 Needs Assessment 0 Project Monitoring and
Documentation 0 Census/Demographics 0 Project and Performance
Evaluation
Planning and Development 0 Projects and Organizations 0 Budgets
o Management 0 Procedures and Systems
Call or write Sue Fox
710 WEST END AVENUE
NEW YORK. N.Y. 10025
(212) 222-9946
Have you heard?
fN THE5£ TfH£$
Whether it"s environmental politics or the
political environment. IN THESE TIMES is the
very best alternative in American journalism.
We've built our reputation on addressing the
issues the mainstream media ignores, and
that"s why our unique point of view has been
trusted by thousands of readers for over a
decade. Why not see for yourself?
NUC L EAR
r -------------------------1
I Send me a free copy of IN THESE TIMES.
iliI.DIII!nl If I like the newspaper I will pay you 518.95 (a 31% savings off the regular price)
III for six months - 2t more issues. If I decide not to subscribe for any reason,
I I' ll just write "cancel" across the invoice and that's it - no further obligation.
I n SI8.95.ilmonth.
I [ ] S34.950neyeor Il 8illmeloter
I [I S24.95 StudontJR.tired one yeor
I Nome - -.------- - ------ ---
I Addr ...
I City, Stote, Zip _ _. __ _
I Abo .. prices ... for U.S. resiMnt. only. C.nodi.n and Melic.n ord .... add S13.00 per ye ... -rAA-rq 2,
I All other foreign orden add S11.00 per ye .. for 5· 10 day delivery.
I IN THESE nMES, 1912 Debs Ave., Mt. Morri., IL 61054. Or call In Illinois 1-800-892'()753 . t,
16 • CITY LIMITS
FEATURE
The city's zoning laws still bend
and stretch to meet the needs of developers.
BY TODD W. BRESSI
L
and development in New York
is still up for grabs. Bigger build-
ings are rising every day-from
towers in Manhattan to walk-ups in
single-family areas in Queens-pil-
ing more people onto streets and
subways and dramatically changing
neighborhoods. Decisions about what
is constructed are often negotiated
behind closed doors at meetings
where city officials sell the public's
open space, light and air to the high-
est bidder.
This is happening despite the city's
zoning laws, which were created at
the beginning of this century to pro-
tect neighborhood dwellers and the
character of communities by regulat-
ing the size, shape and use of new
construction. In a city where land is
the most valuable commodity, cur-
rent zoning regulations have been
abused so routinely that a broad
spectrum of planners and politicians
are questioning their worth.
Katherine Kennedy, author of a
recent Women's City Club/Natural
Resources Defense Council report
that broadly criticized the city's
zoning policies, puts it bluntly: "The
city's zoning resolution and other
land use regulations have become
meaningless. "
The Department of City Planning
(DCP), which processes applications
for new development and proposes
zoning changes of its own, contends
that matters are improving. In the
past decade, the agency has elimi-
nated loopholes that allowed devel-
opers to build bigger buildings than
zoning permitted, rezoned much of
the city so new development con-
forms more closely to existing neigh-
borhood characteristics and fought
zoning violators in court.
But critics say this kind of fine-
tuning fails to address deeper faults.
"The zoning resolution exists in a
vacuum, it isn't driven by any sense
of values, it doesn't reach toward a
clear set of goals," says Kennedy.
Many say that this lack of vision
serves the purpose of those in power.
While the Department of City Plan-
ning has a voice on whether con-
struction should go ahead, the City
Planning Commission, which is
appointed by the mayor, and the
Board of Estimate have the final say.
(Under the new charter, more power
will go to a new planning commis-
sion and the mayor.)
Cash Cow
With a pro-development admini-
stration, this system greases the
wheels of construction, allowing
immediate political and economic
imperatives to ride roughshod over
the long-term needs of the city.
"When Koch became mayor, New
York had nothing going for it but its
real estate. He made that into the
city's cash cow," says Elliot Sclar, an
urban planning professor at Colum-
bia University. Sclar and numerous
others say Koch milked the city's
real estate cow at the expense of
broader community needs.
Established in 1916, New York's
zoning law responded to fears that
the oversized Equitable building on
Broadway portended a generation of
sun-blocking skyscrapers and that
garment factories were intruding on
Fifth Avenue retail areas. The city's
zoning is amended continuously, but
has been revised comprehensively
only once, in 1961.
That rezoning standardized the
practice of regulating density by a
formula known as Floor Area Ratio,
which bases the allowable size of a
building on the size of a lot. It also
introduced building height and shape
regulations that sought to replace
the city's characteristic "wedding
cake" buildings with modern-style
towers set in open lawns or plazas.
Room To Build
Despite these controls, overbuild-
ing persists. For one thing, the 1961
rezoning provided room for more
development than anyone expected
would occur, often at higher densi-
ties than existed at the time. "There
was an assumption the market would
never come to the point at which
everyone would build out to the
maximum floor area. But that's be-
ginning now, and the result is we're
dealing with overcrowded condi-
tions," says John Shapiro, planning
consultant and president of the
American Planning Association's
metropolitan New York chapter.
In fact, there are so many ways to
build more densely than zoning al-
lows that the already generous zon-
ing acts as a floor, not a ceiling, for
what developers can do. The 1961
rezoning established density "bo_
nuses," which permit developers in
some areas to build 20 percent more
than allowed if they provide public
open space in return. By the 1970s
exposes of poor plaza design ques-
tioned whether the city was getting
Kath.rin. K.nn.dy:
"Land u •• regulation. have become
meaningl •••. "
its money's worth. Yet the city went
on a bonus binge, offering extra
density for amenities like atriums,
neighborhood projects and subway
improvements. The Housing Qual-
ity program (terminated by DCP in
1987) simply gave developers a
square foot of development rights for
every $5 they paid the city; an audit
last year by state Comptroller Ed-
ward V. Regan placed the value of
that bonus at $300 a square foot.
The city added "inclusionary
zoning" to its bonus menu in 1987. It
was adopted after housing advocates,
following examples in San Francisco,
Boston and elsewhere, proposed that
the city require all developers to build
low income housing or contribute to
a housing fund. A mayoral commis-
sion recommended against it and the
requirement to include affordable
housing was turned into a bonus of
up to four square feet for every square
foot of low income housing built.
Despite the potentially lucrative
terms, this is one bonus developers
have been reluctant to use, with!only
General Atlantic Realty having taken
advantage of it to date.
In recent years , DCP has begun
eliminating bonuses, but problems
persist. Another provision that al-
lows added density is the "zoning lot
merger," which lets developers move
development rights from one lot to
another. DCP sets few limits on how
many development rights can be
piled on a site and often there is no
December 1989 • 17
ultimate limit on the bulk or height
of a building. That's why Peter
Kalikow's proposal for an 81-story
tower amid the renowned low-rise
City and Suburban buildings on the
Upper East Side requires no special
approval. Nor does DCP coordinate
where extra density is shuffled, to
protect sunlight or prevent overload-
ing of the infrastructure-from streets
and subways to sewers and side-
walks. That ' s why Cityspire, the
Metropolitan and Carnegie towers-
each over 700 feet tall, each using
transferred development rights-are
:..: clustered together in midtown.
u
Up
Responding to criticisms of the
zoning policy, DCP executive
if) director Can Howe says that zoning
is undergoing a fundamental review.
Yet density is not the focus. "We
don't think, overall , the city is too
dense. Certain areas are, and we are
looking at them," he says.
Instead, DCP is concerned with
building design. "The issue that tran-
scends all neighborhoods is build-
ing form. In a neighborhood that has
a traditional building type, to intro-
duce a new one has to be thought
through carefully, " Howe says.
Consequently, DCP's most impor-
tant zoning reform has been "contex-
tual zoning," which seeks to rein-
force building types built over the
past 100 years. It also addresses
concerns about density, albeit indi-
rectly, Howe maintains: contextual
height and design controls have
"direct implications" about how
dense buildings can be, and how
development rights can be used under
bonuses and zoning lot mergers.
Contextual districts were mapped
several years ago on parts ofthe Upper
East and Upper West sides, and
during the last two years were ex-
panded to low- and mid-density
residential neighborhoods in the
outer boroughs. So far they've won
mixed reviews. Westsiders, while
praising the preservation of mid-
blocks, say contextual zoning allows
bigger buildings along Broadway than
were built before. Housing advocates
argue contextual zoning in outer-
borough residential districts makes
it harder for lower income house-
holds to afford housing by limiting
production of affordable units and
driving up construction costs.
18 • CITY LIMITS
At the same time that DCP is trying
further contextual zoning in a lim-
ited number of neighborhoods, pri-
vate developers are pushing ahead
with rezoning proposals of their own
in other areas and often winning
Board of Estimate approval-a prac-
tice known as "spot zoning."
"The developer comes in and says
what he wants to do. They cut a deal
and figure out how they're going to
get it through the community. It's all
negotiated, it's not planning at all,"
argues Genie Rice, president of Civi-
tas, a group monitoring land use
policies on the Upper West Side. A
prominent example of of "spot zon-
ing" is the decision that led to the
construction of the 42-story Citicorp
tower in Hunters Point, Queens, a
neighborhood oflow-rise apartments
and factories. (See City Limits, Janu-
ary 1987)
DCP has little choice but to proc-
ess developer applications, Howe
says, and evaluates them "in the
context of our own planning efforts.
In some areas, we have a published
report that can be very specific, such
as our convention center study,
which talked about the kind of zon-
ing that ought to take place. "
In practice, matters do not always
work out so neatly. Last year, the
Glick Organization proposed rezon-
ing a site bounded by 60th Street and
First and York avenues for a 49-story
tower that would include a hotel,
shops, movie theaters and housing.
DCP' s plan for the area called pri-
marily for housing and shops. Nev-
ertheless, the planning commission
recommended only that the tower be
shorter and that the theaters and some
stores be cut , and the Board of Esti-
mate approved the project. Now
NRDC is representing Civitas and
three other groups suing to block the
project, claiming infrastructure and
environmental impacts were not
studied sufficiently.
While DCP is willing to suggest a
broad planning direction for neigh-
borhoods, it does not always follow
up with its own zoning proposals.
"It' s one thing to fulfill our responsi-
bility as planners and make recom-
mendations, and it ' s another to ap-
ply for a zoning change. It takes an
enormous time and effort," Howe
says , adding the department was
comfortable letting developers im-
plement city planning's proposals
on a site-by-site basis.
Moreover, "We often have com-
munity groups that say they want
comprehensive zoning, but when
faced with an application for more
than one property, they become very,
very concerned about what propos-
als rezoning would lead to, " he adds.
Still DCP seeks rezoning when it
wants, not only with contextual dis-
tricts , but also, for example, around
Times Square, where a temporary
upzoning in the early 1980s created
a development bonanza.
Carte Blanche
And where DCP has done no plan-
ning at all , developers have carte
blanche to ask for what they want
and dare the city to tell them no.
Along the Manhattan waterfront ,
where planning efforts have been
scattered, Donald Trump proposed
transferring development rights from
the Hudson River bed to Trump City.
That DCP is understaffed is hardl y
contested, and that much staff time
is consumed reviewing applications
for land use changes, rather that
working on long-term plans, is not
disputed. But this is hardly an ex-
cuse for so many site-by-site rezon-
ings. "Just because applications come
in doesn't mean they have to be
approved. DCP has to render a judg-
ment, and the judgment has been
that they' re all good," Sclar says.
Community boards, besieged by
zoning amendments proposed by
developers and feeling as if they have
little influence over their neighbor-
hoods, are taking zoning matters into
their own hands. Three boards (in
the West Village, Chelsea and the
Morrisania section of the South
Bronx) are seizing the power gi ven to
them by the city charter and prepar-
ing community plans of their own.
"We were reacting to one proposal
after another. DCP was hitting us
with a barrage of text changes and it
seemed as if the changes were cater-
ing to developers," says Marie Dor-
man, chairperson of the zoning
committee of Manhattan's Commu-
nity Board 2. "The community must
be able to prescribe for its own fu-
ture, not (settle for a future) moti-
vated just by money and campaign
contributions. "
While all three boards acknowl-
edge DCP's cooperation in preparing
plans, they are hampered by DCP' s
lack of a clear policy on evaluating
and approving them. DCP has asked
for an environmental review of the
Chelsea plan, an analysis usually
undertaken by the applicant for a
December 1989 • 19
land use change, but the community
board has no resources to prepare
such a review. Approval ofthe plans
also faces uncertainty as the city's
process of reviewing land use changes
is being restructured as part of the
new charter.
The debate over whether zoning
reform will come from a series of
technical changes, a comprehensive
citywide rezoning or a neighborhood-
by-neighborhood approach seems to
be tipping toward the latter. "The
zoning resolution needs to return to
the idea of planning, either by doing
neighbor ho 0 d -by-neighb or hoo d
planning, or looking at a trend in a
certain building type," says Bill Ryan,
associate director ofissues and plan-
ning for the Municipal Art Society's
planning center.
But whether that will work with-
out a fundamental change in how
the city' s political leadership views
land use policy is doubtful. "There' s
a sense that the developer writes his
own ticket for zoning, " observes
Kennedy. "Since zoning has ceased
to stand for a set of values, there is
nothing to put on the other side of
the scale. What we need to do is pull
down the other side so we have a
clear sense of what zoning is for: pro-
tecting the environment and protect-
ing neighborhood character. " 0
Todd W. Bressi, associate editor of
"Places, a Quarterly Journal of Envi-
ronmental Design, "writes frequently
about city design and community
development.
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS
for the lease of the historic
FULTON FERRY FIREBOAT HOUSE
The City of New York seeks a not-for-profit organization to lease the building for
cultural , educational , and/or civic use. The Fireboat House is located at the foot
of Old Fulton Street in Brooklyn. Built in 1930 as a marine fire station, the
building is part of the Fulton Ferry Historic District. It is a two story wood frame
structure with 1200 sq. ft . per floor.
To obtain a copy of the Request for Proposals, contact:
Patricia-Ann Kopp, Director of Contracts and Procurement
Department of Ports and Trade
Battery Maritime Building
New York, NY 10004
Tel. #212-806-6752
All proposals must be received no later than 11 am on February 7, 1990.
A Pre-Proposal Conference is scheduled for January 8, 1990. RSVP to reserve a
space at the conference no later than 2 p.m. on January 3 to Patricia-Ann Kopp
at (212) 806-6752.
20 • CITY LIMITS
PIPELINE
Housing at Risk
commercial development. A spokes-
person for Grenadier Realty, which
owns or manages the three build-
ings, says, "There are no plans at this
time for any of our properties to leave
the Section 8 program."
NEXT YEAR MORE THAN 6,000
units of housing in New York City
may no longer be affordable because
their owners can opt out of federal
subsidy agreements that limited
rents charged to tenants. Housing
advocates are warning that this loss
could have serious ramifications, but
public officials seem to be taking a
wait-and-see attitude.
Francine Kellman, a spokesper-
son for the regional office of the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, says the agency does
not yet see the issue as a major con-
cern. She is unable to provide exact
information on the number of proj-
ects at risk and says that only one
project, Hawthorne Gardens in
Brooklyn, has opted out of a federal
subsidy program.
Housing advocates, recognizing
that 90,000 units may ultimately be
affected, are demandng a more ag-
gressive response. Victor Bach, di-
rector of housing policy and research
at the Community Service Society, is
piecing together information on the
date and location of projects eligible
to end their federal use restrictions.
"I believe tenants are uninformed of
what risks they face ," says Bach.
The housing units that Bach is
concerned about were all constructed
or rehabilitated with subsidies from
the federal government under a vari-
ety of programs. In return for accept-
ing the government money, building
owners provided affordable rental
. housing for a set period of time-
generally 15 to 25 years. However,
an increasing number of owners will
soon have the chance to opt out of
their contract or prepay their mort-
gages and then charge market-rate
rents for the units. Local rent regula-
tions will offer protection for some
units, but it is not clear how the rent
would be set.
Buildings located in gentrifying
neighborhoods are most at risk of
turning into market-rate projects. In
Manhattan's Community Board 4,
which includes the "hot" neighbor-
hoods of Chelsea and Clinton, Bach
has learned of at least four projects
eligible to opt out of a federal sub-
sidy program known as Section 8.
Three of those projects-one that
has already reached its opt-out pe-
riod and two that become eligible in
1990-are located in close proxim-
ity to Worldwide Plaza, the mam-
moth new luxury residential and
Despite the staggering number of
units that could be lost nationwide,
Congress has been slow to provide
long-term solutions. A report issued
last year by the National Housing
Preservation Task Force estimated
that across the country more than
one million apartments could be lost
to the low income housing inventory
by 1995.
In 1987 Congress enacted the
Emergency Low Income Housing
Preservation Act, which put a num-
ber of constraints on owners prepar-
ing to prepay federal mortgages or
opt out of Section 8. Although that
law expires soon, Congress seems
likely to extend it until September
30, 1990. HUD and Congess have
also agreed to renew any expiring
contracts for five years. Larry Yates
of the National Low Income Housing
Coalition argues that owners should
be required to remain in the federal
programs as long as there is a critical
shortage of affordable housing.
Bach is planning a special work-
shop on housing at risk in early 1990.
o Doug Turetsky
Now we '1leet
For 15 years we've insured tenant and community
groups all over New York City. Now, in our new,
larger headquarters we can offer more programs
and quicker service than ever before. Courteously
Efficiently And professionally
•
more .nsurance
needs than ever
for groups
lilee yours.
Richards and Fenniman, Inc. has always provided
extremely competitive insurance programs based
on a careful evaluation of the special needs of our
customers. And because of the volume of business
we handle, we can often couple these programs
with low-cost financing, if required.
We've been a leader from the start. And with our new
expanded services which now include life and bene-
fits insurance, we can do even more for you.
For information call:
Ingrid Kaminski, v.P.
(212) 267-8080.
RIch .... and FennI ........ lnc.
123 William Street, New York. New York 10038-3804
Your community housing insurance professionals
LETTERS
Rude Strategy
To the Editor:
The church-based groups which
sponsored the construction of Ne-
hemiah houses in New York's most
desolate neighborhoods may use a
rude strategy to meet their aims. But
Lisa Glazer just touched the ques-
tion of why they have to use Alinsky's
methods. Why does the city not
provide sufficient help to support
Nehemiah houses and make them a
success?
It's easy for critics to complain
about waste of space and bad archi-
tecture, but the plan works. Why
does the city not take the Nehemiah
plan as a model and create its own
organization to produce and main-
tain houses on a regulated nonprofit
basis? The city could easily make
some improvements concerning
density, design and occupancy. If
community groups were able to pro-
vide: the financial foundation for
constructing almost 2,000 homes,
why could the city not provide the
interest-free revolving construction
loans? If the new organization is to
be successful , its work should be
extended to rehabilitation of aban-
doned buildings, which might be the
next step in a stability emphasizing
redevelopment strategy based on
homeownershi p.
Tony Schroeder
Manhattan
Astute Reporting
To the Editor:
I am very pleased to write you to
re-continue my subscription to City
Limits, after my year's absence from
the United States. I missed your as-
tute reporting (especially Doug
Turetsky's).. valuable information
and insights, and even your 'help
wanted page, which has kept me
NEW YORK CITY:
December 1989 • 21
informed of the possibilities of
moving back to New York City over
these past five years.
Keep up the good work.
Peter Levine
Chicago
OHensive Politics
To the Editor:
Let my subscription expire (as
should your rag). I find your politics
offensive.
Lawrence Mielnicki
Manhattan
Editor's note: City Limits wel-
comes letters from our readers.
But we ask that you try to keep
your letters to 300 words in
length.
THEN & NOW - FOR .JUST $30
"At last a book as big
as its subject"
Richard C. Wade
Distinguished Professor
of Urban History
"Gives us the missing pieces
left out oflhe regular media's
coverage of important city
issues"
CUNY Graduate Center
one year subscription to CITY LIMITS,
New York's premier community/urban
affairs news magazine and get "Fiorello
H. LaGuardia and the Making of Mod-
ern New York"-the just published
blockbuster biography of America' s
most memorable 20th century mayor-
at 40% off the hardcover price.
Ruth Messinger
Manhattan Borough
President-Elect
New York City
r-------------------
I 0 YES! Start my subscription and send me one copy of
"Fiorello H. LaGuardia" (allow 3 to 4 weeks for delivery) . I
I have enclosed a $30 check or money order. (This offer is
I limited to new subscribers only, please.)
I Name ______________ ___ _
I Address ________________ _
I
I
City State Zip -- I
City Limits / 40 Prince Street / New York NY 10012 ~
L-_________________ --L. ___________________ _
I- Ie 0 I; I: S S I 0 " \ I . It I II .: ( ' 'I' ., II , .
Barry K. Mallin
Attorney At Law
A decade of service representing
community development organizations
and low income cooperatives.
56 Thomas Street
New York, N.Y. 10013
Telephone 212/619-6800
DEBRA BECHTEL - Attorney
Concentrating in Real Estate & Non-Profit Law
Title and loan closings 0 All city housing programs
Mutual housing associations 0 Coopertive conversions
Advice to low income co-op boards of directors
100 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, (718) 624-6850
a,chlt,ctu,al/'IIIin",ln, SSW/CIIS '0' nonp,oflt d'rBlOp,rs
o Building Evaluation and Inspection
o Feasibility Studies 0 Construction Supervision
o Preliminary Design/Scope of Work Studies .
o Complete Construction Drawings & Specifications
. .
Call John Harris RA. for an your project's needs
458 (718) 398-1440
BERNARD CARR ASSOCIATES
J-51 TAX BENEFIT EXPEDITING
Specialists in:
• HDFC'S • Gut ltehabilitation
• Vacant BuildinJ Progra.m pevetopmenls
If ynu hav,- ... cl tH' art- planning H iJuilding p,·uj," '1.
WI' "0" .O\· P YIII'" TIMf;. MO EY. u",( SA ITY.
CALL TODAY FOR A FREE CONSULTATION
1740 Victor Street, Bronx, NY 10462 Tel, (212)824-5044
TURF COMPANIES
Building Management/Consultants
Specializing in management & development
services to low income housing cooperatives,
community organizations and co-op
boards of directors
329 Flatbush Avenue
Brooklyn, N.Y, 11217
Mr. John Touhey
718/857 -0468
SMOLLENS and GURALNICK,
COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Specializing in representing tenants only in
landlord/tenant proceedings, cooperative
conversions, loft proceedings. We represent
sellers/buyers in house, condo and co-op closings,
15 Maiden Lane, Suite 1800
New York, NY 10038
2121406-3320
LAWRENCE H. McGAUGHEY
Attol'ney at Law
Real Estate, Subsidized Housing, Wills,
Tl'ust & Estates,Business and Not-for-P,'ofit
COJ'porations, Ecclesiastical Law
217 Broadway, Sujt!' 610
New York, NY 10007
212/513-0981
GEOGRAPHYA INC.
Consultants To Non-Profits in
Recreational, Cultural, Art & Tour Programs
Culture for community economic development
Culture as a fundraising tool
Mr. H. Margulies
67-35 Yellowstone Blvd
Forest Hills, NY 11375
(718) 261-8476/522-5620
Abeles Phillips Preiss & Shapiro, Inc.
Zoning
Land Use
Planning and Development Consultants
Real Estate Feasibility
Economic Development
Housing
Market Studies
434 Sixth Ave., New York NY 10011
307 N. Main St., Highstown NJ 08520
REACH 25,000
212-475-3030
609-448-4753
NEW YORK DECISION-MAKERS
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS 0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPERS
AND MUCH MORE
To place a low-cost Professional Directory listing
please call our Ad Director at 212/925-9820.
WORKSHOP
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. New York Marxist School seeks a FIT
Executive Director. Exp working in a nonsectarian multiracial
environment & demonstrated leadership ability reqd. Exp in fun-
draising & fiscal mgmt desireable. Immediate opening. Sal low
20s. Resume: N.Y. Marxist School, 79 Leonard St. , NYC 10013.
Minorities, gays & lesbians encouraged to apply.
NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCES DIRECTOR. Creative, expd
manager needed by dynamic, nonprofit citywide prog serving
volunteer nbhd groups. BA + 2-5 yrs traininglTA exp reqd. Exc
bnfts. Salary Reqs & Resume: CCNYC, 3 W. 29th St., NYC
10001, Attn: Gillian Kaye.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION SPECIALIST. Primary responsi-
bility inclds administering local historic preservation commission
& ordinance in Jersey City, NJ. Architectural review exp reqd.
Master's deg prefd. Resume: Richard Bass, Dir. of Planning,
Division of Urban Research & Design, 26 Journal Sq., 5th fl. ,
Jersey City, N.J. 07306. Tel. 201 /547-5010.
,
RECYCLING ORGANIZER. NYC nonprofit org seeks highly
motivated ind to join recycling program. Cmmty organizing exp &
bilingual a +. Good bnfts, salary negot. Resume & Cover Letter:
Environmental Action Coalition, attn: Stephen Gallagher, 625
Broadway, NYC 10012.
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - FIT. For the Manhattan
Valley Development Corporation (MVDC), a nonprofit housing
development org providing affordable housing to the predomi-
nantly low income pop of Manhattan Valley (west 1 00th-11 Oth
streets btwn Central Pk West & Broadway). Responsibilities:
community planning & program dev; interface w/govt agencies,
banks, co-sponsors, architects, contractors, attys; represent
MVDC at Bd of Estimate, City Planning Comm, Cmmty Bd #7;
develop funding sources/proposals; coordinate MVDC programs;
assist Exec Dir in overall admin matters & attend Board meetings
in her absence. Reqs: Min 5 yrs paid FIT exp in housing/planning/
development, fund raising + knowl of govt agencies. B.A. prefd.
Sal: low-mid 30s + exc bnfts. Resume: Search Committee,
MVDC, 931 Columbus Ave., NYC 10025. No telephone calls.
STAFF A TIORNEY. Activist community org in Hell's Kitchen sks
FIT attorney w/ commitment to affordable housing. Landlord/
Tenant exp prefd but not reqd. Represent low income tenants &
tenant assocs, conduct impact & affirmative litigation, cmmty
education & organizing. Start A.S.A.P. Resume: Miriam Nieves,
Housing Conservation Coordinators Inc., 777 Tenth Ave., NYC
10019. Minorities/women encouraged to apply.
STAFF OPENING TO FILL?
ADVERTISE YOUR JOB/INTERNSHIP IN THE "WORKSHOP"
Each month the "WORKSHOP" lists job opportunities
in a variety of fields:
HOUSING • THE ENVIRONMENT • SOCIAL WORK
COMMUNITY JOBS • URBAN PLANNING
NON-PROFIT MANAGEMENT • AND MUCH MORE
RATES: $40.00 for a maximum of 50 words.
Display Help Wanted - $30 per col. inch.
DEADLINE: 15th of the month for the next issue.
Call Harry at 212/925-9820 to place your ad!
Or FAX it to City Limits at 212/966-3407!
December 1989 • 23
TENANT/COMMUNITY ORGANIZER. For Pratt Area Commu-
nity Council. Provide counseling, educational, organizational
assistance to tenants, small homeowners & cmmty assocs;
prepare info on housing/cmmty issues; work w/cmmty, tenant &
block assocs & organize housing workshops. Reqs: Exp in
organizing, cmmty relations, tenant/landlord counseling prefd.
Knowl of hsng issues, laws, complaint procedures helpful. Exc
communication & conflict mediation skis. Will train novice. Sal
com mens w/exp, exc bnfts. Resume: Exec Dir, Pratt Area Com-
munity Council, 201 DeKalb Ave., Brooklyn, N.Y. 11205.
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. Interesting & diversified posi-
tion avail in busy public affairs off at large Brooklyn-based real
estate mgmt firm. Must be detailed oriented, have some college
& exc communications skills. Type 55wpm, WP a must. 2-3 yrs
office exp w/public affairs bkgrnd prefd. Full company paid bnfts
incldg health club membership. Nonsmoking office. Resume:
EM, 1310 Pennsylvania Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11239; or call 718/
642-2550 for appt. E.O.E.
LAW ASSOCIATE. Expd associate to work w/sole practitioner.
Emphasis on cooperatives, private placements, low/mod income
housing, real estate, trust & estates. Must have good skills &
willing to handle diverse matters independently. Resume: Law-
rence McGaughey, 217 Broadway, NYC 10007.
The Pratt Institute
Center For Community & Environmental Development
is seeking applicants for three FIT positions:
ARCHITECTURAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT. Work w/Pratt
Collaboratiye Director managing architectural office serv-
ing low & mod income nonprofit client groups. Assist
architects preparing proposals, reports, specifications, bills,
budgets & correspondence. Some clerical assistance. Reqs:
3-4 yrs exp, or equiv combination of education & expo
Clerical & WP skills. Dbase or Lotus desireable. Interest in
housing & cmmty devel issues, ability to work independ-
ently. Sallow 20s + bnfts .
DESIGNER/DRAFTSPERSDN. Assist production of design,
working drawings, specs & cost estimates for architectural
projects incldg low/mod income housing, special needs
hsg & cmmty service facilities. Participate in bldg evalu-
ations & securing approval from govt agencies. Reqs: Bache-
lor of Architecture or other relevant degree w/one yr exp
in arch off; exc design/ drafting skills & some knowl of NYC
bldg codes, rehab construction, scopes & cost estimates.
Sal hi teens-low 20s.
PLANNER. Provide direct technical assistance/training to
nonprofit development orgs & conduct research in urban
policy issues affecting low inc neighborhoods. Reqs: M.S.
in Planning & at least 2 yrs exp w/low inc neighborhood
planning & related public policy issues or equiv combina-
tion of education & expo Knowl of nbhd-based orgs & their
role in low ~ n c cmmty development & facility w/computer
applications (incldg Lotus, Dbase & WP) to planning &
devel projects. Sal $30-33,000 + bnfts.
These are grant-funded positions. Review of resumes to
begin immediately. Send resumes to: Human Resources
DepartmentlCLP, Pratt Institute, 200 Willoughby Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11205.
NEW BUILDINGS
Creative Solutions for today's
Housing and Healthcare Issues
ALTERATIONS AND REHABILATIONS
CONVERSIONS AND EXPANSIONS
CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
PROJECT PACKAGING AND DEVELOPMENT
COST ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND APPROVALS
Comprehensive Architectural and
Engineering Services from the
conceptual stages through occupancy.
408 Jay Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201
718/237-5887