Crowell v. Arizona Attorney Gen, et al - Document No. 67

Published on February 2017 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 10 | Comments: 0 | Views: 94
of 2
Download PDF   Embed   Report

Comments

Content

Crowell v. Arizona Attorney Gen, et al

Doc. 67

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Joel Knowles, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson (doc. # 66) regarding petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 9). The R&R recommends that the Amended Petition be denied. The magistrate judge advised the parties that they had ten days to file written objections. (R&R at 31 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a), 6(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure)). The parties did not file objections, which relieves the court of its obligation to review any of the magistrate judge’s determinations in the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”). The court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well taken. The court will accept the R&R and deny the Amended Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court
Case 2:97-cv-00913-NVW Document 67 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gary Ray Crowell, Petitioner, v.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 97-00913 PHX NVW (LOA) ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

“may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Anderson (doc. # 66) is accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. # 9) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. DATED this 14th day of December 2006.

-2-

Case 2:97-cv-00913-NVW

Document 67

Filed 12/18/2006

Page 2 of 2

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close