Daimlerchrysler Services North America LLC v. Wanland et al - Document No. 7
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION and ORDER If plaintiff seeks a remand on such a basis it should file a noticed motion for remand within the time period provided for in 28:1447. signed by Judge David F. Levi on 8/25/2005. (Reader, L) 2:2005cv01656 California Eastern District Court
Content
Daimlerchrysler Services North America LLC v. Wanland et al
Doc. 7
Case 2:05-cv-01656-DFL-DAD
Document 7
Filed 08/26/2005
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In an August 25, 2005 verbal communication to the court’s calendar clerk, counsel for plaintiff notified the court that it believes that this case has been wrongly removed to federal court because defendant is a resident of California. If plaintiff DONALD M. WANLAND JR., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, LLC., Plaintiff, CIV-S-05-1656 DFL DAD
seeks a remand on such a basis it should file a noticed motion for remand within the time period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 1447. IT IS SO ORDERED. //// ////
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-01656-DFL-DAD
Document 7
Filed 08/26/2005
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Dated: 8/25/2005
DAVID F. LEVI United States District Judge
2
Doc. 7
Case 2:05-cv-01656-DFL-DAD
Document 7
Filed 08/26/2005
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 In an August 25, 2005 verbal communication to the court’s calendar clerk, counsel for plaintiff notified the court that it believes that this case has been wrongly removed to federal court because defendant is a resident of California. If plaintiff DONALD M. WANLAND JR., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, LLC., Plaintiff, CIV-S-05-1656 DFL DAD
seeks a remand on such a basis it should file a noticed motion for remand within the time period provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 1447. IT IS SO ORDERED. //// ////
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-01656-DFL-DAD
Document 7
Filed 08/26/2005
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Dated: 8/25/2005
DAVID F. LEVI United States District Judge
2
