Definition SME

Published on May 2016 | Categories: Documents | Downloads: 35 | Comments: 0 | Views: 191
of 2
Download PDF   Embed   Report

thesis resource

Comments

Content

Large scale enterprises:
Viet Nam economy have no a clearly identify about the large scale enterprise, but in the
Decree No. 56/2009/ND-CP, the Government modify factors can organized the small-medium
enterprise, aslo micro enterprise.
Definition of SMEs in Viet Nam

Base on that definition, assume that the large scale enterprise in Viet Nam is that have total
capital more than 100 billion VND and the number of laborers more than 300.
But in the 52nd circular of Vietnam Ministry of Finance in 2012, large scale enterprise is defined
that has capital more than 120 billion VND, determined in audited Financial Statement in the
nearest year or based on the recent issue results. Besides, the large scale enterprise also has more
than 300 shareholders at the time closing the list of shareholders at the Securities Depository
Center (SDC) on December 31st each year base on the list that State Securities Commission (SSC)
announced.
In assessment of Oxychemcorp, the number of employees and sometimes annual turnover also are
referred to identify the scale of a company. Another assesment of Vnr500 set the ranked according
to other independent criteria such as profit, total asset, number of employees, which are further
evidence of enterprises strength in each aspect. Hence, the large scale enterprises employs from
250 to 1,500 people, earn more than 500 million USD of profit each year, total asset is more than
1thousand billion.
Based on these standards, Forbes Viet Nam ranked 50 large scale companies with the best
business performance on the stock exchange. Total market value of these 50 companies reached
741 thousand billion VND, accounting for 65 percent total capitalization of HOSE and HNX
(calculated in June, 2014). But in this paper, we excluded all firm in financial sector, banking and
finance, insurance, leasing, business service, renting, because of some of firm lack of information
for the certain period about the inventory and cost of good sold to evaluate operating cycle.

Introduction:
A number of studies show a direct relation between investment and firm value (Burton, Lonie,
& Power, 1999; Chung, Wright, & Charoenwong, 1998; McConnell & Muscarella,1985).
Additionally, since the seminal work by Modigliani and Miller (1958) showing that

investment and financing decisions are independent, extensive literature based on capitalmarket imperfections has appeared that supports the relation between these two decisions
(Fazzari, Hubbard, & Petersen, 1988; Hubbard, 1998). Despite the importance of the
interrelations between the individual components of working capital when evaluating their
influence on corporate performance (Kim & Chung, 1990; Sartoris & Hill, 1983; Schiff &
Lieber, 1974), few studies of empirical evidence for the valuation effects of investment in
working capital and, more specifically, the possible influence of financing on this relation
exist. Studies on working capital management fall into two competing views of working
capital investment. Under one view, higher working capital levels allow firms to increase their
sales and obtain greater discounts for early payments (Deloof, 2003) and, hence, may increase
firms' value. Alternatively, higher working capital levels require financing and, consequently,
firms face additional financing expenses, which increase their probability of going bankrupt
(Kieschnick, LaPlante, & Moussawi, 2011)

Sponsor Documents

Or use your account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Forgot your password?

Or register your new account on DocShare.tips

Hide

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close