India on the Brink - Act Now, Or Perish.

India on the Brink : Act now, or Perish.

NT RAVINDRANATH Director (Research) VPM's Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Thane

March 2014

PREFACE
This year world over there will be many events organized, many research papers will be written and many books will be published to mark the 2014 as the centenary of the first world war. Even Royal Shakespeare Company is staging a new play in United Kingdom. Incidentally 2014 also is the 70th anniversary of Second World War. The Cold war started in the year 1947 when India got it’s independence from Great Britain and Cold war ended in the year 1991 when India liberalized her economy from the shackles of Socialistic economy. Modern wars will be fought with nonconventional weapons or hardware. Earlier wars did use these nonconventional weapons through CIA and KGB. After Cold war KGB did not exist, but CIA operates without any global checks and balances. Earlier India was a battleground for both, but after the Cold war CIA remained unopposed player. Operations and manipulations of CIA and KGB are well documented and we should not waste our ink in repeating those stories. The tragedy is that we have not learnt any lessons from these overt and covert war designs. From Kashmir to Kerala there are separatist organizations operating without any hindrance. We are spending sizable monetary and human resources on internal security. Recent events have exposed our military preparedness. Macro and micro level corruption in every walk of our life is not only frustrating and painful but a guaranteed weapon to economic disaster in the hands of those who want India perpetually economically weak and dependent. All 'right' movements from environment to women are also used as weapons by NGOs to stall almost all developmental activities in India. It is no wonder that such NGOs are showered with foreign funding having close links with Church or CIA. How are we going to change this? We are a democratic country. Responsible political parties should choose educated candidates with impeccable record. If they fail you have right to choose a 'clean' candidate or use 'none of above' option if available. NT Ravindranath is a retired Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer. He is also a serious researcher. His analysis and predictions in his earlier book India Under Siege: A Wake up Call are proving prophetically true. So his analysis of present condition of India in this research paper will have to be taken very seriously. His message is clear and loud. I hope readers would take it seriously.

Dr. V. V. Bedekar March 2014

I

INDEX
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Introduction Conspiracy behind hijacking of Gandhiji’s Gram Swaraj concept Sinister designs Maoist movement Why civil society groups try to promote chaos and anarchy in India A shift in strategy Anti-national activities of the UPA government Efforts to weaken armed forces by blocking or delaying defence Infrastructure projects and promoting internal rivalry and indiscipline. Efforts to weaken Intelligence Bureau’s counter terror operations. War on India’s economy Preparation for a final uprising Manufacturing revolutions, like the colour revolutions in CIS countries Formation of Aam Aadmi Party Arvind Kejriwal: A wolf in sheep’s cloths. Linkages between various militant and secessionist movements, Church activists, civil society groups in India and western agencies. 1 2 4 8 10 13 14 20 23 23 24 24 28 30 32

II

Abbreviations AAP AFSPA BARC CISF CIA CIS CWG CPI CPI (ML) CPL DMK EU FCRA GTF IAS IAF IMDT IPS IRS ISI IPC IMI IPSIP J&K JFMC JNNURM LBSNAA LTTE MoD MoEF MGNREGA NATO NAC NGO NSCN (IM) PESA PFI PIPFPD PDP PLA POTA PoK PUCL RAD STK UAPA ULFA UPA :(Aam Aadmi Party) :(Armed Forces Special Power Act) :(Bhabha Atomic Research Centre) :(Central Industrial Security Force) :(Central Intelligence Agency) :(Commonwealth of Independent States) :(Commonwealth Games) :(Communist Party of India) :(Communist Party of India-(Marxist-Leninist) :(Community Participation Law) :(Dravida Munnetta Kazhakam) :(European Union) :(Foreigners' Contribution Regulation Act) :(Global Tamil Forum) :(Indian Administrative Service) :(Indian Air Force) :(Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act) :(Indian Police Service) :(Indian revenue Service) :(Inter-Services Intelligence) :(Indian Penal Code) :(Israel Military Industries) :(India-Pakistan Soldiers Initiative for Peace) :(Jammu and Kashmir) :(Joint Forest Management Committee) :(Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission) :(Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration) :(Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam) :(Ministry of Defence) :(Ministry of Environment and forest) :(Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act) :(National Atlantic Treaty Organization) :(National Advisory Council) :(Non-Governmental Organization) :(National Socialist Council of Nagaland-(Isak Chishi Swu-Thuingaleng Muivah) :(Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act) :(Popular Front of India) :(Pakistan-India People’s Forum for Peace and Democracy) :(People’s Democratic Party) :(People’s Liberation Army) :(Prevention of Terrorism Act) :(Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir) :(People’s Union for Civil Liberties) :(Rheinmetall Air Defence) :(Tamil National Alliance) :(Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. :(United Liberation Front of Assam) :(United Progressive Alliance) III

Introduction: India is facing the gravest ever crisis today since independence, because of an imminent threat to its very survival as a sovereign nation. This threat has come in the form of a vast network of activist NGOs and human rights organizations, now known as civil society groups, supported, funded and controlled by some western intelligence and church agencies, with the ultimate aim of balkanization of India. Many of these organizations which were first established in India as charity organizations, later changed their colour and started showing their fangs by supporting various militant and secessionist movements in the country. The NGO activism got a big boost in the early 1970s with the patronage it received from Sonia Gandhi who came to India in 1968 as the Italian bahu of Indira Gandhi. Many militant people’s movements like Narmada Bachao Andolan and Kastakari Sanghatana were started in the mid-1970s and the take over of the Maoist movement by the action group NGOs also took place during this period. With Rajiv Gandhi becoming the Prime Minister of India in 1984, there was a substantial increase in the NGO lobby’s political influence in the country with the successful induction of many of its nominees into key positions of power in the administration under different ministries. In 1992, two very important legislations i.e. 73d and 74th amendments to the Constitution were passed by the Parliament, with the avowed objective of strengthening the institutions of Panchayat Raj and urban bodies through decentralization of power, so as to allow the people at the lowest level to take part in the decision making process. Supporting the two amendments, the NGO activists had boasted that the two Acts would help to realize Gandhiji’s dream concept of Gram Swaraj. In 1996, another important legislation called Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, (PESA) 1996, which granted extension of the idea of local self-governance to tribal regions in the country, was also passed by the Parliament. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panchayats_(Extension_to_Scheduled_Areas)_Act_1996) The PESA endowed the Gram Sabhas, the management and control of natural resources and adjudication of justice in accordance with local traditions and customs. This Act was reportedly originally drafted jointly by an NGO activist based in Maharashtra and a human rights activist based in Hyderabad. The NGO activists have been strongly advocating the need for strengthening the Panchayat Raj system and empowering the village panchayats in the country, since last two decades. Their demand had the whole-hearted backing of some senior Congress politicians like Mani Shankar Iyer, Jairam Ramesh and lately Rahul Gandhi. When the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance was voted to power in 2004, one of the first major decisions of the new government was the creation of a separate ministry for Panchayat Raj, and entrusting the charge of the new ministry to Mani Shankar Iyer. The creation of an independent Ministry for Panchayati Raj by the UPA government in May, 2004 was actually the fruition of an idea cherished by the NGO- action group lobby in India led by Sonia Gandhi. In 2006, another NGO-sponsored Bill, called ‘The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forests Rights) Act, 2006’ was passed by the Parliament, which granted the right of ownership of land and control over minor forest produce and natural resources to the inhabitants of the tribal areas. This Act, also called the Forest Rights Act, was originally drafted by Pradip Prabhu, an NGO leader working among the tribals of Thane district in Maharashtra. He had also conducted a nation- wide campaign by holding morchas and demonstrations throughout the country in association with other like-minded activist groups to mobilize support for this Bill. Why are the civil society activists, who have been supporting all anti-national movements like Maoist movement, Kashmiri separatists, Tamil nationalist organizations and agitations against various mega development projects in India have suddenly become the champions of Gram Swaraj and empowerment of Gram Sabhas and forest panchayats? 1

Conspiracy behind hijacking of Gandiji’s Gram Swaraj concept. The Panchayat Raj is a system of governance in which the gram panchayats are the basic units of administration. It functions at three levels at gram (village), tehsil (block) and zilla (district). Mahatma Gandhi was a strong advocate of the Panchayat Raj system, a decentralized form of government where each village will be responsible for its own affairs and had described it as Gram Sawaraj (village self-governance). In January 1957, the Government of India had appointed a special committee headed by Balwant Raj Mehta to examine the working of the Community Development Programme (CDP) and National Extension Service (NES) and to suggest measures to improve the functioning of the CDP and NES. The report submitted by the Mehta Committee and approved by the government in 1958 had set the stage for the establishment of Panchayat Raj institutions in India. The committee had recommended for the launch of a scheme for the democratic decentralization of power which subsequently came to be known as Panjayat Raj. As per the 3-tire Panchayat Raj system recommended by the Mehta committee, there will be a gram panchayat at the village level, a panchayat samiti at the block level and a zilla parishad at the district level. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balwant_Rai_Mehta_Committee) About thirty years after the implementation of the Mehta Committee report on Panchayat Raj, the civil society activists suddenly raked up the issue again in the 1980s, demanding decentralization of power right up to the lowest level of panchayat institutions so as to allow the people at the grassroots level to participate in the decision making process, which alone, they argued, will help to realize Gandhiji’s dream concept of Swaraj. Under the pressure of activists and with the support of a top leader of the Congress party, the Constitution (73d amendment) Act, also known as Panchayat Raj Act, was finally passed by the Parliament in 1992. It came into force on April 24, 1993, giving necessary constitutional sanction to the Panchayat Raj institutions. Article 243(A) of the Constitution says that the Gram Sabha may exercise such powers and perform such functions at village level as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide. It is under this provision, that the State Legislatures have endowed certain powers to the Gram Sabha relating to village development. However, the powers given to the Gram Sabha under this provision were confined only to discuss, debate and scrutinize the reports on socio-economic development programmes implemented by the gram panchayat and the annual statement of accounts and audit reports for the previous year. Thus the Gram Sabha did not have real powers to implement any scheme. However, the provisions of the Pachayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), has not only extended development, planning and audit functions to the Gram Sabhas, but also endowed it with powers for management and control of natural resources and adjudication of justice in accordance with local traditions and customs. While the 73d Amendment to the Constitution passed by the Parliament in 1992 was aimed to strengthen the Panchayat Raj institutions at the lower levels and empower them to take part in the decision making process under the decentralized governance, the 74th Amendment to the Constitution in 1992 was intended to facilitate decentralization of urban governance. The 74th Amendment required the state governments to amend their municipal laws in order to empower the urban local bodies with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self governance. This Amendment in its section 243 S provides for setting up of Ward Committees to ensure citizen participation in decision making. Thus the 73d and 74th Constitution Amendment Acts of 1992 provided constitutional mandate for decentralization of governance and creating units of local self government at both the rural and urban settlement levels. In December, 2005, a city modernization scheme called the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) was launched by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, and under this mission a Community Participation Law (CPL) was made mandatory to be enacted in the states, which involves constitution of Area 2

Sabhas (or Mohalla Sabhas) enabling further decentralization of urban bodies below the Ward Committees. The law has been made mandatory by making it a condition to avail funding under JNNRUM. The Community Participation Law (CPL), also termed as ‘Nagar Raj Bill’ is an elaborate law that prescribes the structure, powers and functions of the Area Sabha and also prescribes the constitution and governance of the ward committees. As per this law, the hierarchy of representation after the municipal body would be the ward committees followed by Area Sabhas. Thus the Area Sabha or the Mohalla Sabha would be the lowest unit in the hierarchy. Panchayats in tribal areas will soon be controlling forest management at the ground level, replacing the control of the Forest Department. At a meeting held during the third week of May, 2010 between Union Minister of state for Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh and Union Minister for Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, C.P.Joshi, it was decided to remove Joint Forest Management Committees (JFMCs) from the control of the District Forest Officer and instead bring them under the control of the Gram Sabhas and forest panchayats. This is now being implemented in the tribal areas that come under the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas ) Act (PESA), 1996. The JFMCs are the basic units of participatory forest management at local level which will take into consideration the views of all stakeholders. However the civil rights activists have sabotaged this system with their political influence, and managed to bring them under the Gram Sabhas. Thus the Gram Sabhas would now control all the funding that is routed through the one lakh JFMCs across the country for various forestry-related schemes. The money will now be routed through the forest panchayats in tribal areas. Forest Department staff will be made accountable to the panchayats on all relevant issues. Panchayat institutions will have to be consulted before making any decision or declaration involving the forest land. Thus the staff of the Forest Department, whose primary duty is to protect the forest from forest dwellers and outsiders, would now work under the Gram Sabha or Forest panchayat, taking orders from them. All the forestry-related funds also would be controlled by the Gram Sabha. (http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tpnational/tp-tamilnadu/forest-management-panels-to-come-under-gram-sabha/article862402.ece). Sinister designs. The NGO lobby’s sudden love and interest in empowering the Gram Sabhas and its proclaimed aim to strengthen the Panchayat Raj system has some sinister designs. Their aim is not simply to strengthen the Panchayat Raj, but to take control of the empowered panchayat institutions throughout the country. When the provisions of the Panchayat Raj are fully implemented, there would not be much powers left with the state and district administration and those who control the panchayat institutions in rural areas and mohalla sabhas in urban areas would become the real rulers of the country. Without the consent of the Gram Sabha, no mining project, whether it is coal, bauxite, iron ore or uranium, can be undertaken by the government, or any development project can come up under the jurisdiction of the Gram Sabha and the Mohalla Sabha. In rural areas, where the major industrial and development projects are concentrated and new ones are scheduled to come up, the Gram Sabhas are almost fully under the control of the NGO activist groups. It is with such sinister designs that the militant NGOs are concentrating on organizing the masses in the remote rural and tribal areas and pressing for full implementation of the Panchayat Raj Act and 73d and 74th amendment of the Constitution. It is easy for the foreign-funded NGOs, who work in the remote tribal and rural areas, to influence the poor and illiterate village elders by bribing them with liquor and money and control the Gram Sabhas. Militant NGOs have already established their control over thousands of Gram Sabhas in states like Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh and Maharashtra. The Gram Sabhas are now used by the NGO-sponsored anti-development lobby to stall hundreds of mega development projects, including 3

coal, bauxite and other mining projects, in these states in a bid to stall our economic progress at the behest of their funding agencies in the west. For instance, all the 12 Gram Gabhas controlled by the NGO lobby in Rayagada and Kalahandi districts of Odisha have voted against the Rs.50000 crore aluminium refinery project of Vedanta Resources in the Niyamagiri hills in August, 2013. (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/12th-gram-sabha-too-votes-against-vedantamining/article5039304.ece) In another instance, the new Environment and Forest Minister Veerappa Moily has given the environmental clearance to the Rs.52000 crore POSCO steel project in Odisha, which was held up since 2005 due to pending environmental clearance from the MoEF and NGO-sponsored anti-POSCO agitation by the local villagers. But the NGOs, using the Gram Sabhas can still block this project. Origin of NGO militancy The activist NGOs or civil society groups were earlier known as social action groups, voluntary action groups, non-governmental organizations or non-party political formations. The evolution of activist NGOs with state and national level networking is a phenomenon that originated in 1960s and after having gained momentum in the next two decades, transformed itself into a parallel political force by 1980s. The establishment of this NGO network was a carefully planned part of a well-calculated strategy by the capitalist countries led by the USA for direct intervention in the rest of the world, especially in the third world countries, for giving development assistance to the rural poor with the hidden objective of curbing the growth of communism and also for promoting Christianity. There was extreme poverty and a lot of inequalities in the third world countries in those days and the ground situation in many of those countries was very conducive for the growth of revolutionary movements. The capitalist forces did not want the Soviet block to take advantage of such a situation to spread its sphere of influence to all such countries by engineering revolutionary regime change. It was mainly to prevent such a possibility that the capitalist lobby led by the USA started giving development assistance to the rural poor in those countries through the NGO network. These NGO activists who worked among the people even in remote areas of all such countries were also used as a reliable source of information by the western agencies to correctly assess the mood and temper of the people and also the socio-economic and political situation in those countries which was of immense value to the capitalist block to formulate their policies towards such target countries. Since mid-seventies, there was a significant shift in the style, strategy and mode of functioning of these activist groups with most of them accepting and propagating militancy as a tool to empower the Adivasis and other oppressed rural poor to fight for their rights and demands. As per this new strategy, the leaders of these groups, in the name of empowering the rural poor, started educating the rural masses about their citizenship rights, land rights, etc, and also their right to lead a dignified life. They were also taught and trained to fight for their rights by organizing a militant movement against the concerned authorities to get their demands conceded. Evolution of this new militant movement, known as action group movement, was the result of a sinister international conspiracy worked out by the western intelligence agencies and church agencies like Opus Dei to indulge in political activism in other countries, especially in third world countries, to influence and control the ruling regimes in those countries. The militancy was introduced into this movement to build up a vast network of such militant groups who could be used later as an instrument for facilitating a regime change in those countries where the policies of the existing regimes were considered as either inconvenient or hostile to the interests of the western block countries. Thus, under this new strategy, it was required to build up a vast network of militant civil society groups in every country mainly to protect the interests of the imperialist block. The objectives of this movement however differed from one country to another depending upon the strategic requirements of the capitalist lobby in different countries. The method that the activists adopted for educating the rural poor about 4

their citizenship and land rights and their right to lead a life with dignity and to train them to fight back against oppressive forces like the police, forest staff and the civil authorities was greatly inspired by the liberation theology movement that originated in the Latin American countries in the sixties and gained considerable influence in the region in the seventies. The liberation theologians all over the world have been using the revolutionary teaching methods propagated by the Brazilian educationist Paulo Frire to promote literacy in general and adult education in particular among the poor and illiterate masses. This method of teaching involved a direct dialogue with the subjects and sensitizing them about the social environment and circumstances which kept them under a state of subservience for a long period of time and empowering them to fight back against the oppressive forces for their liberation. Paulo Frire had written a booklet titled ‘Pedagogy of the Oppressed’ which is widely used by the liberation theology activists in Latin America and other countries as a teaching manual for empowering the disempowered. The same book is also used by the NGO activists in India to educate the rural masses in India for their empowerment. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedagogy_of_the_Oppressed) Liberation Theology Movement From late 1950s there was a strong and growing feeling among a section of Catholic bishops and priests in Latin America for the need for a preferential option for the poor to counter the growth of socialist movements and protestant sects which they saw as an emerging threat to the influence of the Catholic Church. They felt the need for a shift of emphasis in Latin American Christianity from charity and alms-giving to an advocacy of social justice through empowerment of disadvantaged classes. It is the intellectual articulation of this line of thought that led to the liberation theology movement, and its most concrete application is the formation of Base Ecclesial Communities. The second Vatican Council (Vatican-II) held from 1962 to 1965 was an important milestone in the history of the Catholic Church as some path-breaking decisions were taken at this conference. One important decision taken at this meeting was the silent approval of a new revolutionary movement based on the concept called Liberation Theology that was being propagated by some sections of the Catholic church in the Latin American countries. There was prolonged debate on the new movement at the conference and finally it was decided to give silent approval to the new movement without giving any open support to it. This denial of open support to the new movement was a tactical decision taken to silence a powerful section within the top brass of the church who feared that since the new movement preached Marxian ways and militancy to empower the poor to fight against oppression and injustice, there was a grave risk of the poor getting lured into the genuine communist movement and thus becoming counterproductive. Thus, accepting the new movement in principle, the Vatican-II called upon the church to become involved with the struggles of the poor and pointed out that if the church stopped aligning with the powerful elite and advocated the need for a more just world, the poor could be reached more effectively. In 1968, the Latin American Episcopal Conference (CELAM) met in Medellin, Colombia, mainly to discuss about applying the Vatican-II decisions on Liberation Theology to Latin America and giving the church authority to become involved in the social change. The concept of creation of Base Ecclesial Communities (base communities) in the interior areas to organize people to fight for their rights, to carry forward a Marxisminspired people’s movement for a social change and to carry out consciousness-raising evangelism, was evolved at the Medellin conference. Base communities are groups of Catholics, mostly from low-income strata, who get together once in a week in a neighbourhood church to reflect on Bible and carry out social and political activities. The liberation theology leaders at the Medellin conference criticized the inequalities between the 5

social classes and called for a commitment to the poor. They asserted that the violence was wrong, but sometimes necessary when fighting against institutionalized violence such as violence by the government. Adopting the liberation theology style of activism, the civil society activists in India are also trying to establish total control over the Gram Sabhas and Mohalla Sabhas and shape them up like the Base Communities of Latin America. As per the new ‘doctrine of activism’ adopted by the Vatican, the Catholic church in India also accepted the new doctrine and deputed some clergy-men to work among the tribals and other rural masses in the remote areas of the country to educate and train them in organizing militant struggles to get their various grievances and demands conceded. As per this strategy, the first batch of 30 catholic priests resigned from the church in 1976 and took to activism. Peter D’Mello @ Pradeep Prabhu, one of the most prominent civil society activists in India, who is now an advisor on tribal affairs to the Planning Commission, was one of the thirty priests who quit the church in 1976 to become a social activist. Peter D’Mello who changed his name to Pradeep Prabhu and Nicolson Cardozo, another Catholic priest who resigned from the church along with Prabhu in 1976 to become a social activist, together founded the Kashtakari Sanghatana, a militant tribal outfit in the Dahanu-Jawhar tribal belt of Thane district in Maharashtra in 1978. Some more Catholic priests have subsequently resigned from the church to become social activists and to lead people’s movements in different parts of the country as part of this church strategy. There are also some other priests who became social activists without resigning from the church. Fr. Thomas Kocheri of Kerala who is in the forefront of organizing the fish workers in India and Fr.Cedric Prakash, who is a prominent human rights activist of Gujarat, are among the Christian activists still directly associated with the church. Maoist movement The naxalite movement in India originated in 1967 from a small village called Naxalbari located near Siligudi in West Bengal. It started in the form of an agrarian uprising led by Charu Majumdar and Kanu Sanyal, two radical CPM activists who were influenced by the revolutionary thoughts and teachings of the Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong. Though the government of West Bengal was able to suppress this violent uprising, this peasant uprising soon caught the fancy of many leftist intellectuals and young radicals throughout the country and a new movement of left extremists was born in India with the formation of some independent left extremist groups in states like West Bengal, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala. Since the agrarian uprising in Naxalbari village had given the inspiration for the emergence of these new radical groups, they all came to be known as Naxal groups and the followers of this movement were called Naxalites. This movement led by veteran leaders like Charu Majumdar in West Bengal, Kondappilli Sitaramaiyyah in Andhra Pradesh had drawn good response from the people in the initial stage. But soon, it started splitting and disintegrating, especially after the death of Charu Mazumdar in police custody in 1972, because of the ego clashes among its leaders. It was at this stage i.e. around mid-seventies that the net-working NGOs started its militant action group movement in the country and some of its leaders started befriending leaders of various Naxalite groups seeking their cooperation in building up militant people's movements all across the country to oppose the anti-poor policies of the government. In due course, the NGO action groups were able to establish a working relationship with some of the leading Naxalite groups in the country. With this mutually beneficial understanding and association between the two movements, the disintegrating Naxal groups got a fresh lease of life with the support it received from the action groups and the action group movement got an appropriate ally to push forward its anti-national operations in India as desired by its controlling agencies in the imperialist block led by the US. This close cooperation between the NGO action groups and leading Naxalite outfits not only got considerably strengthened in the due course but led to a total takeover of the Maoist movement in the country by the NGO action groups with liberal funding from the western agencies and induction of a number of action 6

group volunteers into major Naxalite groups like the CPI (Maoist) and CPI-ML led by Kanu Sanyal and K.N.Ramachandran. Many Christian action group cadres have also been inducted into prominent Naxalite groups under the garb of liberation theology activists. For instance Vernon Gonsalves @ Vikram, a state committee member of Maharashtra unit of CPI (Maoist) who was arrested by the ATS, Maharashtra, in August,2007 and another top Maoist leader Arun Ferreira, r/o Bandra, who was arrested by Nagpur police had both confessed to the police that they were originally activists of liberation theology movement. A number of human rights activists including Dr.Binayak Sen,Vice President of PUCL, have also been arrested in the past for their close links with the Maoist movement in the country confirming the close links between the Maoist movement and NGO and human rights net-work. Since the Christian action groups in the country are all controlled by various church agencies, many church leaders in India are also now directly linked with the Naxalite movement. Today, with the full support and all possible assistance from the networking NGOs and also with the systematic induction of a large number of NGO activists into major Naxalite groups, the Naxal movement in the country, controlled totally by the western agencies, has now grown very powerful and continues to make steady inroads into more and more new areas, especially in the remote and tribal regions. About 200 districts in 20 states in the country are now reportedly considered as naxal-infested. A CPI-Maoist document titled “Strategy and Tactics of the Indian Revolution” issued by the Central Committee of the CPI-Maoist in 2004 says that the path followed by Lenin in Russia that of capturing urban areas, establishing revolutionary authority in the urban areas and thereafter capturing the villages and establishing the revolutionary authority in the whole country, is not suitable to India. It says that the Indian revolution will have to start from the opposite direction. It should start from the far-flung backward villages towards cities. The idea of building bases in the rural areas and then encircling cities is a well-known tactic advocated and adopted by Mao Zedong. The CPI- Maoist leadership also advocates creation of Base Areas in the remote and tribal regions in the country by winning over the rural masses by exploiting their poverty, unemployment and other grievances and preparing them for a protracted struggle against the government. Maoist strategy says that the revolutionary war has to begin in those regions that are relatively more backward and where the social contradictions are sharp. Therefore the primary concentration of the CPI-Maoist is the poor rural masses living in the remote rural and tribal areas. The inadequacy of transport and communication system and isolation of the remote country-side also make them an ideal base for the nascent Maoist guerrilla army. If the disconnected rural areas form the initial target for the Maoist agenda, contradictions found in the urban centres provide the second stage. Supporting the many separatist movements in India based on identity, religion and caste politics is their third area of concentration. The Maoists have thus supported the separatist movement in Kashmir, Khalistani movement in Punjab, LTTE and other Tamil nationalist movements in Tamil Nadu and all other militant and insurgent movements in the rest of India. The 9th Congress of the CPI-(Maoist) had passed a resolution saying that ‘This Unity Congress unequivocally supports the right of self-determination of all the oppressed nationalities including their right to secede from the autocratic Indian state’. The Maoist movement in India is now totally controlled by the NGO and human rights lobby working under the garb of civil society groups, which are funded by the church and western intelligence agencies. The civil society groups and Maoists are working together with the common objective of creating dissent and disaffection among various sections of people in India. Their efforts to take over and control all panchayat institutions like the Gram Sabhas and urban local bodies like the Mohalla Sabhas are aimed to shape them up as liberation theology style Base Communities and Maoist style Base Areas in the country so as to facilitate the realization of their ultimate goal of India’s balkanization through a mass uprising. (http://www.rediff.com/news/column/states-ambiguity-has-restricted-its-anti-maoist-progress/20130528.htm) 7

International support for Maoist movement As already stated above, the CPI-(Maoist) movement in India is now being used as a convenient tool by the western agencies to promote chaos and anarchy in India with the ultimate aim of balkanization of India. These agencies are also suspected to have played a key role in setting up branches of fake revolutionary communist parties in different countries, mainly in western countries, to mobilize international support for the Maoist movement in India. Bob Avakian, Chairman of the Revolutionary Communist Party of America, is also the top most leader of the World Maoist Movement. The first international conference, jointly organized by International Committee to Support the People’s War in India and the Hamburg-based League Against Imperial Aggression, was held at Hamburg on November 24, 2012 to commemorate the first death anniversary of Maoist leader M.Koteswar Rao @ Kishenji who was killed in a police encounter in West Bengal. Delegates from over two dozen countries, including Austria, Canada, Brazil, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Spain, Britain and the USA, attended this conference. The International Committee was formed in Paris in January, 2010. Pushpa Kamal Dahal @ Prachanda, Maoist leader of Nepal, was once considered as the second most important leader of the world Maoist movement, after Bob Avakian. He has now disbanded his underground army in Nepal and has accepted the parliamentary democracy. A genuine Maoist could never have accepted parliamentary democracy. (http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/maoists-whip-up-support-abroad/1199131/) Why the Civil Society Groups promote anarchy and Chaos in India? The civil society organizations are promoted, funded and controlled by certain western intelligence agencies, Corporate Houses and Foundations and Christian funding agencies to protect the interests of the US and its NATO allies and the Church all over the world. These groups are active now in almost all countries in the world including Russia and China. However their assignments differ from one country to another depending upon the strategic interests and objectives of the western lobby in a particular country and the political affiliation of the ruling regime in that country. In most countries, the role of these groups is to cultivate agents in all political parties and at top levels of the administration, judiciary and security forces to ensure the continued support of the ruling regime to the policies of the US-led western block in world affairs. In authoritarian countries like Cuba and Venezuela and in countries wherever the ruling regimes are perceived by the US as hostile to its interests, the objective of these groups would be to promote a congenial atmosphere for the overthrow of the ruling regime in association with all dissident, militant and secessionist groups in such countries, and to install a friendly regime. 10 The western block, however, always had a different agenda for India and China, two countries with vast area and big population. The US think tanks knew that these two countries with vast territory and big population would be the main challenger to their world domination in the long run, and they wanted nothing but the balkanization of these two countries. China However, in China, because of its totalitarian regime and also because of severe restrictions placed on networking NGOs and human rights organizations, the western intelligence agencies could not carry out any significant level of destabilization activities so far. In the recent years, they have achieved some amount of success in stirring up some protest programmes by separatists in Tibet against Chinese occupation and promoting Islamic terrorism in Muslim dominated Xinjiang region. However, the western agencies are unlikely to succeed in triggering any major anti-government uprising in China in the near future. Meanwhile, confirming the western fears about China and India, China which was a poor country like India in the sixties and seventies, has already emerged as the second biggest economy in the world, besides becoming a major military power, and is poised now to surpass even the US economy in the near future to emerge as the biggest economy in the world. 8

Russia Even in Russia, the civil society movement poses a big headache for the government. The “glasnost” era had paved the way for the emergence of a vibrant civil society in Russia. However Vladimir Putin who became the President of Russia in 2000 later realized how the NGO and human rights organizations were acting against the interests of the country and felt the need to impose some restrictions on the activities of these NGO and human rights groups which were projecting themselves as civil society groups. Russian authorities believed that the US and European countries were using these civil society groups to promote western influence in the erstwhile former Soviet dominions. This threatened Moscow’s prerogatives in its neighbourhood. Ukraine for instance had started expressing a desire for getting a NATO membership. It also underwent an ‘Orange revolution’ that replaced the pro-Russian presidential candidate with a pro-American candidate and the Russian authorities found that the take-over bid by the western elements was facilitated by the civil rights groups. Ukraine was thus poised to break out of the Russian orbit and Moscow feared that Ukraine’s entry into the NATO will bring western forces to Russia’s borders. These NGOs also supported the people’s movements in sensitive areas like Chechnya and condemned the human rights violations occurring in those areas. Irked by such activities of the foreign-funded NGOs, Putin in 2006 enacted a law that gave government agencies in Russia broad authority to regulate the activities of NGOs and started implementing the new law to curtail the activities of NGOs. Another law that was used to silence the NGOs was the anti-extremism law enacted in 2002. Kremlin particularly targeted those NGOs which were working on sensitive human rights issues in regions like North Caucasus, those receiving foreign funding and those trying to stir up public dissent. The 2006 law gave wide powers to the government in the formation and operation of all NGOs. It can reject applications on pettiest grounds. The officials can conduct intrusive inspections to harass the NGOs and tie them down in weeks and months of paper work. In July, 2012, the Russian government introduced and passed a new amendment to the law on nongovernmental organizations which came into effect in November, 2012. The new Law required all foreignfunded non-governmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in any kind of political activity to declare themselves as “foreign agents”, an expression synonymous with the word “spy”. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/rbth/politics/9713857/ngos-anger-new-russia-law.html) India The independent India that emerged after the British-aided partition in 1947, was not supposed to survive as a single united entity for long as per the calculations of the US, British and other western think-tanks. Many of these intellectuals, including former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill thought that India with all its religious, linguistic, and ethnic diversities and rivalries would soon collapse as an independent and united India under the weight of its own internal contradictions. However, to their utter dismay, the new Indian leadership showed extraordinary tact and maturity to overcome all the teething problems and succeeded in forcing all the recalcitrant princely states to merge with the Indian Union to emerge as a well-knit united entity. This was a big set back for the sinister designs of the imperialist lobby. In their scheme of things, there was no scope for the existence of an independent and united India. Because, they knew that India with its vast size and population could one day emerge as a parallel power centre in South Asia, and this had to be stopped at any cost. Thus, the destabilization of India has been a priority for the western strategists ever since India’s emergence on the scene. The two main objectives of the so-called civil society in India is to promote Christianity and to encourage and support all militant and insurgency movements in India with the ultimate objective of a Soviet Union-type break-up of India into ten or twenty independent smaller countries, which will serve the strategic and long-time interests of the USA. It was because of this long-term goal, that despite our seemingly good relations with the US and its allies, the US was always creating hurdles against India’s economic progress and preventing India from becoming a major 9

military power. India had developed the capacity to explode a nuclear device in 1966 itself. However, late Dr.Homi J. Bhabha, founder director of BARC, who disclosed this to the then American ambassador Chester Bowls in 1965, mysteriously died in an air crash near Mont Blanc on January 24, 1966. Subsequently in 1968, the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) was signed jointly by the nuclear and non-nuclear countries, mainly on the initiative of the US, to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons, thus effectively stalling India’s attempt to become a nuclear power. When India exploded a nuclear device in 1974 and a second time in 1998, sanctions were imposed on India by the US and its allies on both the occasions. If India had exploded a nuclear device before 1968, Pakistan would never have become a nuclear power. The US and the UK had also always supported the cause of Pakistan on Indo-Pak dispute over Kashmir, ever since the partition. Out of its 67 years of existence, Pakistan was under the military rule for more than 30 years. Pakistan adopted terrorism as a state policy since 1980s and even gave safe shelter to international terrorists like Osama Bin Laden and Dawood Ibrahim in its territory. Despite all such misdeeds, Pakistan remained a close ally of the US is something which can have no logical explanation other than the inherent animosity of the US towards India. When the Pakistani tribesmen and regular troops invaded and occupied one-third of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947 and India was in the process of evicting them through a counter attack, it was the US and UK, using Lord Mountbatten and his wife Edwina, influenced Indian Prime Minister Nehru to call off the war against the invaders and take the issue to the United Nations, where it remained frozen for all these years allowing Pakistan to enjoy the fruit of its aggression. It is also a known fact that the Christian missionaries, supported by the western agencies, were responsible for promoting all secessionist activities in the north-eastern region. All the other militant and secessionist activities in India like the separatist movement in Kashmir, Sikh militancy in Punjab, pro-LTTE and Tamil nationalist movements in Tamil Nadu and Maoist movement in interior parts of India are also promoted and funded by the western agencies with the sole purpose of balkanization of India. A shift in strategy It was around mid-seventies that the foreign-funded activist NGOs started its militant people’s movements by mobilizing the masses in the interior parts of India to get their various demands and grievances redressed and to stall all development projects in their areas raking up environmental, displacement of people and livelihood issues, even by resorting to violence. Many church leaders, under the guise of liberation theology activists, also joined such movements, some of them even by resigning from the church, as per this new strategy worked out by the western intelligence and church agencies. They also built up a working relationship with major Maoist outfits in India which were on the verge of disintegration and gradually took total control of the Maoist movement through liberal funding and induction of several NGO activists into such outfits. Along with a vast network of militant social action groups and a resurgent Maoist movement, the western agencies also started building up a vast network of its agents in various political parties, ministries and government departments, all prestigious academic and research institutions, among senior lawyers and judges, writers and artistes, historians and academics and armed forces personnel, with special focus on top administrative officers, lawyers and judges and armed forces personnel. This grand strategy of building up powerful militant people’s movements all across the country and a strong network of top bureaucrats in the administration and cultivating a powerful coterie of senior advocates and judges, which was started in the seventies got a big boost in 2004 when the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) was voted to power and Manmohan Singh became the Prime Minister of India. This was a farcical arrangement, as while Manmohan Singh held the Prime Minister’s post, all the powers of the PM were illegally usurped by Sonia Gandhi. Later Sonia Gandhi set up a National Advisory Council (NAC) with herself as its chief to advise the Union Cabinet on crucial issues of governance, but virtually functioning like a super cabinet. This NAC, composed mostly of NGO stalwarts, exposed Sonia Gandhi’s close links with the NGO lobby beyond any doubt. 10

The Union government has enough material evidence to prove that the activist NGOs, funded and supported by the church and western agencies, were directly involved in various anti-national movements in the country like the Maoist movement, separatist movement in Kashmir, ULFA in Assam, Tamil nationalist movement in Tamil Nadu, Sikh militancy, secessionist movements in the north-east and all anti-development agitations in India. By setting up the NAC dominated by such NGO activists, Sonia Gandhi has raised big question mark about her own integrity. Anti-national activities of the UPA government The anti-national credentials of the top Congress leadership also reflected in the policies followed and action taken by the UPA government since 2004. The first major decision of the UPA government after coming to power was the abolition of POTA. When the jihadi terror was becoming more and more ruthless and the Maoist movement was making steady inroads into more and more interior parts of India, was there any logic in abolishing an effective anti-terror law like POTA? The UPA government followed a soft on terror policy and lifted all travel and visa restrictions to Pakistan and also started more cross-border bus and train services between the two countries making it easier for the new terror recruits from India to travel across the border and get training in terror camps in POK. The result was the spread of jihadi terror, which was earlier confined only to Kashmir valley, to all parts of India. In 2005, the UPA government appointed a committee led by Rajinder Sachar, a supporter of Kashmiri separatists, Maoist movement and Naga militant outfit NSCN –IM, to study the problems and status of Muslims in India and suggest remedial measures to improve their lot. His report was on the expected lines and became a tool for Pakistan and western agencies to denounce India for its treatment of Muslims in India. In 2006, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh sent a PDP delegation from Jammu and Kashmir led by PDP leader Mufti Mohammad Sayeed to the UN to make a presentation on his concept of self-rule and autonomy for Kashmir before an international gathering at the UN in November 2006 and canvass support for the same as a possible solution to the Kashmir dispute. By allowing to send such a PDP-delegation to the UN to make a presentation advocating self-rule and autonomy for Jammu and Kashmir, was not the UPA government conveying its support to such a proposal? Despite the large-scale killings, kidnappings, extortions and other brutalities being committed by the Maoists, the UPA government still treated the Maoist movement as a humanitarian problem and refused to take stringent measures to curb it. Even after the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai, Sonia Gandhi refused to enact any tough anti-terror law to combat terror effectively. The UPA government also took a lenient view of the efforts to revive Sikh militancy in Punjab and removed 142 out of 169 dreaded Sikh militants from the black list. It also allowed the Jammu and Kashmir government to stop the practice of hoisting of national flag at Lal Chowk in Srinagar on the Republic Day from 2010, stating that it would be an unnecessary provocation for the separatists in the state. Despite repeated directives from the Supreme Court, the UPA government did not take any action to detain and deport all illegal Bagladeshi immigrants from Assam and other parts of India. The UPA government appointed two known ISI agents, namely journalist Dileep Padgaonkar and academic Radha Kumar, as interlocutors to study and suggest measures to resolve the Kashmir problem. The government in 2009 gave an open invitation to all J&K terrorists who have crossed over to POK since 1980s to come back with their Pakistani wives and settle down in J&K, and even promised them with job and free housing. The sympathy and goodwill shown by Sonia Gandhi and her daughter Priyanka to the accused in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case was responsible for the revival of pro-LTTE sentiments in Tamil Nadu. All the agitations against mega development projects in India, meant to stall India’s economic progress, enjoyed the patronage of Sonia Gandhi. Sonia loyalist and NAC member Aruna Roy and AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan had openly campaigned against the Kudankulam nuclear plant in Tamil Nadu. All welfare schemes like the loan waiver, MGNREGA, food security and aadhar, involving huge expenditure , are actually meant to destroy India’s economy. The new Land Acquisition Act will be a disincentive for setting up any new industrial project in India. 11

Manmohan Singh, even when he was the finance minister of the country during the 1991-95 period had starved India’s nuclear programme of funds, disabling new projects and halting uranium exploration. The uranium crunch that we face today is rooted in the policies pursued by Manmohan Singh even after becoming the prime minister. The UPA government’s 2008-09 budget had slashed the Department of Atomic Energy’s funding by $529 million. As per the nuclear deal signed with the US in 2008, India decided to permanently shut down the Cirus research reactor, one of India’s two bomb-grade plutonium-production reactors, located at BARC Mumbai, by 2010 overruling the opposition from the nuclear establishment. The Cirus reactor which became operational in 1960, was the source of our weapon-grade plutonium for India’s 1974 nuclear test. The Cirus was built with the technical assistance from Canada. The closure of the Cirus reactor in 2010 has deprived India’s nuclear programme one-third of its current supply of military-grade plutonium. The interest and urgency shown by the US in signing a nuclear treaty with India in 2008 was clearly to stifle India’s nuclear programme. Manmohan Singh’s decision to shut down the Cirus reactor, succumbing to pressures from the US and Sonia Gandhi, amounts to most despicable action and a betrayal of the country. Despite such planned and deliberate misdeeds by the UPA government, nobody in the ministry or the party questioned the leadership over such anti-national acts. Even the opposition parties, including the BJP, failed to expose the anti-national activities of the UPA government. The grand strategy of the NGO lobby to build up militant people’s movements all over the country and cultivating/inducting a large network of agents in various ministries and government departments, including the judiciary and armed forces, finally resulted in the creation of a gigantic octopus- like NGO- war machine with its tentacles tightening its grip over the entire country with every passing day. This was made possible because of the help and close cooperation extended to the NGO lobby by Sonia Gandhi from the seventies. Subsequently with the help of this leader, the NGO lobby was able to get some very important but dangerous legislations, as mentioned below, passed in the Parliament. The Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992. Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA). The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. These bills were passed in the Parliament with the proclaimed objective of promoting decentralization of power up to the grassroots level for the realization of Gandhiji’s dream concept of ‘Swaraj’. This so-called dream concept is actually a cunning strategy devised by the western intelligence agencies to grant total autonomy and self-rule to all the states in India by using the sweet terms like empowering the Gram Sabhas and Mohalla Sabhas all across India. With various militant and separatist movements dominating many border states and interior parts of India, what could happen to the idea of India if total autonomy and self-rule is granted to such regions? Clearly the only aim of crooks like Arvind Kejriwl, Rahul Gandhi, Jairam Ramesh and Mani Shankar Aiyar, who are the staunchest supporters of this ‘Swaraj’ movement, is to facilitate the process of India’s balkanization as desired by their masters in the west. There are many IAS, IFS, IRS, and IPS officers and High Court judges among the Indian agents recruited by the western agencies through the NGO lobby to facilitate their shady operations in India. Some of the retired judges and IAS officers could be seen openly associated with the activities of activist NGOs after their retirement. The NGO lobby, with its political influence, was behind the decision of the Union government to start a ten-day attachment course for IAS/IFS probationers with voluntary organizations as part of their winter study tour beginning with 1987 batch, to enable the probationers to familiarize with the condition and problems of the Adivasis and other marginalized sections of people in the remote villages. The hidden aim of this exercise was to give an opportunity to NGO activists to cultivate friends among the young IAS officers and recruit suitable talent for their future operations. As a result of this course, the NGO lobby has been able to build up an army of 12

sympathizers among the IAS officers. One of the voluntary organizations in Thane district (Maharashtra) selected for this training course is the ‘Kashtakari Sanghatana’, a militant tribal outfit, operating in the tribal belt of Thane. The founder-leader of this organization is Pradeep Prabhu, a former Jesuit priest turned NGO activist. There were frequent clashes between the supporters of the Kashtakari Sanghatana and Communist party of India (Marxist) during the period from 1979 to 1985 and there were about 300 cases registered against Kashtakari Sanghatana activists, including Pradeep Prabhu, in connection with these clashes. If the IAS probationers come to an activist like Pradeep Prabhu for such an attachment course, what message it will send to local police and other district officials? Pradeep Prabhu is a very influential person. He used to give guest lectures at LBS National Academy of Administration (LBSNAA), Mussoorie, for IAS probationers since early 1980s. Presently he is a Member of the Advisory Committee of the Planning Commission on the Implementation of Welfare Legislation. He was also an Expert Member of the Expert Committee appointed by the Government of India to examine the extent of tribal land alienation and to recommend legislative measures to curb and control the same. This is a classic case to show how the NGO lobby, with the help and patronage from a top Congress leader, inducts its activists into important positions of power. Kashmir The NGO activists and the separatists in Kashmir valley who are opposed to the extension of any new Indian laws to Jammu and Kashmir as per the provisions of the Article 370, are however have been pressing for the extension of 73d and 74th constitutional amendments relating to empowerment of panchayat institutions, to Jammu and Kashmir. Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi during his visit to Jammu and Kashmir in the first week of November, 2013 had also asserted that the situation in the state would change for the better once the 73d and 74th constitutional amendments were incorporated into the J&K Panchayat Raj Act. The 73d amendment deals with empowering Panchayar Raj institutions while the 74th amendment would make the ward committees and Mohalla Sabhas as self-governing bodies. Underlying treachery behind this move is that, when fully implemented, these amendments would help the Jammu and Kashmir to legally secede from India in the near future. In 2006, Pakistan President General Musharraf had proposed a 4-point formula for a peaceful settlement of the Kashmir dispute. His 4-point formula envisages total withdrawal of Army and other security forces from both parts of Kashmir, allowing people of both parts of Kashmir to travel across the border without Passport and Visa, grant of total autonomy and self-rule to both parts of Kashmir and joint supervision of a unified Kashmir by India and Pakistan. This treacherous proposal, originally proposed by the Kashmiri separatist leaders, was neither accepted nor rejected by the UPA government. However, as per the unofficially accepted 4-point Musharraf formula, the travel and visa restrictions to Pakistan have already been lifted by the government and there is free movement of men and vehicles across the border. The NAC strategy is to do away with requirement of Passport and Visa altogether. The troop withdrawal is accepted by the UPA government in principle and is being implemented in phases. Defence Minister Antony had announced in the Parliament in 2010 itself that 35000 troops and two battalions of para military forces had already been withdrawn from Kashmir following improvement in the ground situation. One important proposal in the Musharraf formula is the grant of autonomy and self-rule. The 73d and 74th amendment of the Constitution is a deceptive term for self-rule and autonomy. That is the reason why the separatists welcome the extension of the 73d and 74th Constitutional amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir. Yes, the UPA government is facilitating the separation of Jammu & Kashmir from India through this deceptive exercise. Greater Tamil Nadu. The LTTE was probably the most brutal and fiercest terrorist organization in the world. It introduced and popularized the culture of human bomb. It had no qualms of conscience or inhibitions in using children to transport bombs or carry out bomb explosions. Its cadres always kept a sodium cyanide capsule tied to a thread worn around their neck so that whenever the situation warranted, they can swallow it and avoid capture. The terror and violence unleashed by the LTTE, is unimaginable. The prominent victims of LTTE terror included 13

former Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa in 1993 and former Indian Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi in 1991.When the LTTE was finally decimated in the final crucial war in May 2009, it was a big relief for the Sri Lankan Army and the people of both Sri Lanka and India. But, the imperialist block was clearly not amused. When the LTTE bases started crumbling in the final phase of the war and its defeat became an imminent reality, there were frantic efforts by the US and its allies like UK and Norway, and even by India under pressure from the US, to stop the war raking up the issue of large number of civilian casualties, but mainly to give an escape route to LTTE leader Prabhakaran. But this time, supported by China, Sri Lanka was in no mood to relent and went ahead with its war and decimated Prabhakaran and whatever was left of his war machine. Since the end of the war, the US and its allies have been making a hue and cry about the large number of Tamil civilians killed in the final phase of the war and demanding an international probe into the war crimes committed by the Sri Lankan Army during the final phase of the war. Sri Lanka however rejected such a demand and instead set up its own committee to verify the truth behind all such allegations. Today, the life is normal and there is total peace and harmony in Sri Lanka. All developmental work disrupted by the long period of militancy and violence has resumed and Sri Lanka is clearly back on its path to peace and prosperity. In the historic polls held in the Northern Province in Sri Lanka in 2013, the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) won a landslide victory and TNA leader C V Wigneswaran was sworn in as the first elected Tamil chief minister of Northern Province after nearly three decades of violence. A batch of 95 Tamil women recruits of Sri Lankan Army, who completed their training at the Bharathipuram Army Training School in Killinochchi had their passing out parade at Security Force Headquarters in Killinochchi in March 2013. These recruits from the former conflict zones had been part of the LTTE’s women’s wing during the conflict. This was reportedly the first time that the Army saw Tamil women, that too former LTTE cadres, joining the Army in such a larger number. (http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-international/95-tamil-women-join-sri-lankaarmy/article4549099.ece) The US and its allies, however, continue to make wild allegations about the war crimes committed by the Sri Lankan Army against the innocent Tamils and are still pressing for an international probe into the genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka. Such propaganda unleashed by the western media, intended to whip up passion and anger among the people of Tamil Nadu, has had the desired effect on the people of Tamil Nadu. More than a dozen new Tamil militant nationalist organizations have cropped up in Tamil Nadu in the recent years condemning the Union government’s inaction in preventing the genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka and demanding a separate Tamil Eelam (Greater Tamil Nadu) comprising of Tamil Nadu and Northern and Southern Tamil provinces of Sri Lanka. In fact, the US and its allies are least bothered about the killings and other atrocities suffered by the Tamils during the civil war in Sri Lanka. They are angry over the killing of their protégé and LTTE leader Prabhakaran whom they were using to promote Tamil nationalism and secessionist sentiments among the Tamils in Tamil Nadu and they now rake up the issue of genocide of Tamils in Sri Lanka only to whip up antiIndia feelings among the Tamils in Tamil Nadu and strengthen their demand for a greater Tamil Nadu as part of their wider strategy aimed at India’s balkanization. When the former LTTE cadres are only happy to join the Sri Lankan Army, why should the British and Americans should shed crocodile tears over the atrocities suffered by the Tamils during the civil war in Sri Lanka? 14

UPA government encourages inflow of Bangladeshi migrants into India The continued influx of Bangladeshi migrants into Assam has changed the demographic profile of Assam. According to the 2001 census report, there were six Muslim-dominated districts in Assam. H.S.Brahma, Election Commissioner of India, in an article written in July, 2012 had stated that according to his information, as per the 2011 census report, 11 out of 27 districts in Assam have now become Muslim-majority districts. If this trend continues, the Hindus in the State will very soon be reduced to a minority community. Many security experts and analysts like Lt Gen (Rtd) S.K. Sinha, former Governor of Assam and Jammu & Kashmir, T.V.Rajeshwar and Ajit Doval, both former chiefs of Intelligence Bureau, had pointed out the grave security implications arising out of the unchecked inflow of Bangladeshi migrants into the country. The Supreme Court of India while invalidating the IMDT Act in 2005 had also expressed similar fears and had directed the Government of India to take immediate steps to identify and deport all Bangladeshi immigrants from Assam and other regions in the country. However, the Government of India under one pretext or other has been avoiding taking any positive action in this regard. In fact the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act (IMDT) passed by the Parliament on December 12, 1983 was introduced by the congress-I government at the Centre only to protect the interests of Bangladeshi migrants in India. This Act is applicable only in the state of Assam. In all other states, the detection of foreigners is done under the Foreigners Act, 1946. Under the Foreigners Act, the onus of proving one’s nationality or otherwise lies on the accused, where as under the IMDT Act, the onus of proving one's nationality lies on the complainant. This makes it impractical and impossible for the concerned authorities to proceed against the illegal migrants in Assam. In July, 2005, the Supreme Court of India quite rightly struck down the IMDT Act describing it as “unconstitutional” and the biggest hurdle in deportation of illegal Bangladeshi migrants from India. The Supreme Court also warned that large-scale infiltration from Bangladesh constituted an “external aggression” against Assam. Shockingly however, instead of initiating action on deporting the infiltrators, the UPA government on February 10, 2006, brought in the Foreigners (Tribunals for Assam) Order to nullify the apex Court’s judgment. But on December 5, 2006, Supreme Court quashed this Order also as unconstitutional, and called for implementation of its earlier judgment dated July 12, 2005 for deporting all illegal immigrants from the country. However despite such a strong verdict from the Supreme Court, the UPA government has not initiated any action so far to detect and deport the illegal Bangladeshi migrants from India or to check the continued inflow of Bangladeshis into India. This omission is deliberate. There is an ISI plot to aggressively push in more Bangladeshi Muslims into Assam and West Bengal to tilt the demographic balance in the border areas of the two states in favour of Muslims. The aim of this operation is obviously to build up a conducive ground in the long run to press for the creation of a third Islamic country in the region. The UPA government’s stubborn resistance to implement the Supreme Court order seeking immediate deportation of all illegal migrants from the country amply illustrates the evil designs of the NAC to create a Kashmir-like situation in Assam. Efforts to weaken armed forces by blocking or delaying defence infrastructure projects and promoting internal rivalry and indiscipline. Appointment of Air Marshal Fali Major as Chief of Indian Air Force The selection of Air Marshal Fali Major as the new Chief of Indian Air force in 2007 was a controversial decision, as he was a chopper pilot. Every other former air chief was a fighter pilot. There is no rule mandating that only a fighter pilot could become the air chief. But that was the convention. There is also the question as to how a man who cannot ,as per rules, command the Western or South Western Command of IAF by virtue of his not being a fighter pilot, can be eligible to hold the post of Chief of Air Staff. According to press reports when it was decided by the government to appoint Air Marshal Fali H. Major as the new Chief of Air Staff, there was a lot of criticism within the ranks against the decision to appoint a non-fighter pilot as the new Air Chief. At least 15

one senior Air Marshal-rank officer was quite vocal on this issue and reportedly had even conveyed his protest to the higher authorities in writing. Eight months after taking over as the new Air Chief, Fali Major probably realised that it was difficult for a non-fighter pilot like him to do full justice to his role as the Air Chief. In November 2007, the Defence Ministry officials were surprised to receive an unusual letter from the Air Headquarters proposing that only fighter pilots should be considered for appointment as Chief of Air Staff in future. An intriguing question arises as to why the UPA government flouted the conventions and appointed a helicopter pilot as the new Chief of Air Staff at the risk of creating internal rivalry and disunity within the ranks. Was it not a malicious attempt to create dissentions within the ranks? A bird stops missile testing range proposal The Navy’s proposal to set up a missile testing range at Tillanchong island in the Andaman and Nicobar islands was shot down by the environment ministry in October, 2012, as the said island was the habitat of an endangered bird Nicobar Megapode. Defence minister A.K.Antony on October 18 confirmed the rejection of the Tillanchong island for the missile range and added that a new site will be identified soon by the Navy chief and a fresh environment clearance will be sought for the new site. The Navy had reportedly sought permission for temporary use of forest land on the island for missile testing. It also wanted to put up a temporary structure as a target for testing the accuracy of missiles fired from the submarines. The test firing was proposed to be carried out once every year for a duration of 7 to 10 days only. Now the Naval authorities will have to hunt for a new site and again seek environmental clearance for the same. Another bird stops a surveillance radar project Raising the bogie of threat to an endangered species of bird ‘Narcondam Hornbill’, the Environment Ministry has refused to clear a critical Ministry of Defence (MoD) project to install a surveillance radar along the coastline in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Narcondam Hornbill is an endemic species of bird found in Narcondam Island, 100 km to the east of the main Andaman Islands. Endorsing the similar fears expressed by the standing committee of National Board of Wildlife, Environment Minister Jayanti Natarajan recommended in September, 2012 that the MoD should look for alternative sites for the proposed radar project. Meanwhile the Coast Guard has reportedly informed the Environment Ministry its inability to shift the location elsewhere as the Narcondam Island was found to be the most suitable location for the proposed radar project. There are nine species of Hornbill found in different states of India, especially in the Western Ghats and in the Northeastern region. Poaching is the biggest threat faced by any rare bird or animal in India. It is the most foolish argument put forward by the environmental lobby that the proposed radar project could wipe out the entire Hornbill population from the area. In fact, the installation of the radar will help to check poaching in the area. The opposition to the radar project has to be seen as part of the ongoing nation-wide sabotage drive by the enemies of the country to weaken and destabilize the country by stalling all our developmental projects, scientific ventures and defence projects. (http://www.indianexpress.com/news/to-save-hornbills-environment-says-no-to-defence-project/998904/) India’s first underground naval base stalled due to Green hurdle India’s first strategic underground naval base that was meant to house its nuclear-armed submarines has run into a tangle over green norms with the regional office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) opposing the diversion of over 600 hectares of reserved forest land citing a strong possibility that it may affect the water table and soil moisture content in the area. The proposed expansion of the base at Rambilli near Visakhapatnam, will consists of underground pens to house nuclear submarines and protected harbours for warships. India should have gone ahead with this secret and vital project at break-neck speed to ensure its early completion in view of the increasing threats to the nation’s security from our hostile neighbors. But the project is now stalled, as the MoEF’s Southern Zone Site Inspection report has observed that the project may have an adverse effect on the water table and soil moisture content in the area. 16

Over the last few years, the Ministry of Defence has black-listed so many foreign arms corporations over the issue of alleged malpractices that it has virtually stalled the military’s modernization programme. The hit list includes some prominent global weapons suppliers with good record of delivering arms and equipments to India. Starting with Bofors in 1980s, the list includes Israel Military Industries (IMI), Denel of South Africa, Singapore Technologies Kinetic (STK) and Rheinmetall Air defence (RAD). The Ministry of Environment meanwhile has refused permission to build some urgently needed crucial roads in Himalayan region bordering China raking up the issue of environmental damage. All these developments are actually part of a sinister plan of the NAC to weaken the capabilities of India’s armed forces, as per its destructive agenda. Growing instances of internal rivalry and indiscipline in the Army The Pakistan-India People`s Forum for Peace and Democracy (PIPFPD) founded in 1994 and India-Pakistan Soldiers Initiative for Peace (IPSIP) founded in 1999 were established by the NGO lobby to organize exservicemen in the country with the avowed objective of building up friendship and peace with Pakistan and pave the way for resolving all outstanding issues with Pakistan, including the Kashmir dispute in an amicable manner. These organizations, jointly founded by social activist late Nirmala Deshpandey and former navy chief-turned activist Admiral L.Ramdas, preach demilitarization, denuclearization and peace and seek a peaceful democratic solution to the Kashmir dispute. The activities of these organizations were however found blatantly antinational in nature. These two outfits are actually promoted by the western agencies to cultivate their agents among the retired armed forces personnel and through them to establish their secret cells among the serving personnel of various units of armed forces, especially in the Army, to promote indiscipline, factionalism and internal rivalry among the service personnel and weaken it from within. The recent incidents of indiscipline at the Army’s Tabri-based Cavalry unit in Punjab in June 2011, a clash between the officers and men of 226 Field regiment at Nyoma in Ladakh in May 2012, the tension generated by the suicide of a jawan of the 16 Cavalry Battalion at Mahesar in J&K in August 2012, the desertion of the unit by ten Army jawans of 56 Armoured Regiment in Patiala in October, 2012, and a clash between the officers and men of 10 Sikh Light Infantry battalion of Delhi while participating in an annual exercise at Dabthua near Meerut in October, 2013 are instances suspected to have been encouraged and engineered by such enemy cells cultivated among the army personnel. Internal rivalries and factionalism are also rampant among senior officers of the Indian Army. This was most prominently seen during the tenure of General V.K.Singh as the Army Chief from 2010 to 2012. Such infighting and factionalism among the Army top brass are promoted by the western agencies to keep them divided and make the Army ineffective in restoring order when the country plunges into a civil war-like situation that may arise in India, as planned by the western agencies. Chief of Indian Navy, Admiral Devendra Kumar Joshi stepped down from his post on February 26, 2014 following a mishap on board Russian-built submarine INS Sindhuratna in which two officers were killed and seven sailors were injured. The navy was rattled by a series of accidents in the recent months and this is the eleventh accident in the last seven months. Earlier, on August 14, 2013, in Indian Navy’s worst tragedy INS Sindhurakshak sank near Mumbai harbor, killing all the 18 men on board, after an explosion. It has now been revealed that two navy chiefs had reportedly advised the defence ministry against giving operational assignments to Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha, under whose command some of the recent mishaps had hit the Navy. Still, the ministry went ahead and picked Sinha to lead the Western Naval Command, the most heavily armed wing of the Navy. Some of Sinha’s annual confidential reports had adverse comments about his professional competence to handle such assignments. But those adverse remarks were expunged from his dossier by the ministry, clearing the way for him to take up such sensitive positions. Earlier, in a rare instance of 17

intervention, the defence ministry had in June 2011overrulrd the navy and appointed Sinha as CISE (chief of integrated defence staff to the chairman, chiefs of staff committee). It did so on the advice of the law ministry. The situation thus looks very serious because of the possibility of sabotage behind these mishaps. (http://www.one.in/hindustantimes/govt-ignored-report-against-navy-no-2-1313869.html) Admiral (Rtd) L.Ramdas, has often been found supporting the cause of Pakistan. (http://www.shohratusa.com/index.php/13/13-page07/543-indian-admiral-admits-beheading-of-pak-soldiers). He is also associated with the anti-development lobby in the country led by Medha Patkar and B.D.Sharma. His wife, Lalita Ramdas is a former director of Green Peace International, which is suspected to have links with CIA. Ramdas’s daughter, Kavita Ramdas, is also a peace activist associated with a global funding agency for woman for last many years. She is presently the Chief Representative of Ford Foundation’s Delhi Office. She is married to Zulfiqar Mohammad, a Pakistani journalist and peace activist. Arvind Kejriwal is a close friend of Admiral Ramdas. In fact, Ramdas had accompanied Kejriwal when he went to file his nomination on November 19, 2013, to contest the Assembly elections from the New Delhi constituency. The fact that one retired Army general, three former Navy chiefs and many other senior defence (retd) officers are associated with these two anti-national outfits (PIPFP and IPSIPD) make it a matter of grave concern. Efforts to weaken IB’s counter terror operations. Intelligence Bureau cannot be considered as a very efficient organization because of its misuse for political purposes, mismanagement by the top brass and wrong priorities given in intelligence collection. But, there appears to be a calculated attempt by the UPA government to make the IB totally ineffective and useless. The charge sheeting of retired senior IB officer Rajendra Kumar and three other serving IB officers by the CBI in connection with the alleged generation of fake IB alerts ahead of the encounter killing of Ishrat Jahan and three other alleged LeT terrorists in June, 2004, is indicative of such a sinister move. Such a thing has never happened in India before. An IB officer can never be questioned by any agency on the basis of the intelligence inputs he provides. Because, the IB officers function like the eyes and ears of the government and they can report on anything under the sun, including some rumours floating around provided it has some value to the government. They are not supposed to reveal their sources. However, these reports are properly graded and only confirmed reports are passed on to the other agencies. In the Ishrat Jahan case, the IB was forced to hand over some secret documents to the CBI and some IB officers not even connected with the said case were also questioned in violation of all norms and procedures. The CBI’s action against Rajendra Kumar and three other IB officers was meant only to demoralize the IB officials and weaken their capacity to undertake counter terror and counter espionage operations. Even the prime minister could not stop this farce indicated that the CBI took such an action on the insistence of the NAC. War on India’s economy. The UPA government’s so-called flagship programmes like MGNREGS, UID-cash transfer scheme, free housing for the poor, the food security scheme and all such welfare schemes, including the loan-waiver scheme, are all destructive schemes deliberately and cunningly introduced and implemented in the country by the NAC with the sole purpose of destroying Indian economy. Thousands of mega development projects in the country are presently stalled or delayed by issues raked up by the anti-development lobby over land acquisition problems, rehabilitation of project-affected people, agitation by local villagers and NGO activists or for want of environmental clearance from the Ministry of Environment and Forests. Some of the mega projects stalled or delayed by the activities of this anti-development lobby 18

include Rs 52000-crore POSCO, Rs 40000-crore Arcelor Mittal and Rs 15400-crore (Tata) steel plants in Odisha, Rs 42000-crore Tata steel plant in Jharkhand, Rs 20000-crore Tata steel plant in Chhattisgarh, 2000 MW Lower Subonsiri hydroelectric project in Assam and almost all new thermal and nuclear power plants in India. As a result of the criminal misdeeds of the UPA government, India’s growth has slowed down to a decade low of 5% while the industrial output has fallen to a 20-year low of 1% in 2012-13.The exports have slumped and the rupee has fallen to Rs. 63 per dollar. It is as though the NAC has declared a war on India’s economy so as to stall India’s economic progress until the western agencies succeed in their ultimate objective of achieving a balkanized India. Preparation for a final uprising The NGO lobby, with the support of the NAC, has been able to considerably strengthen the infrastructure built up over the years for its ultimate ‘break up India’ operation. The Maoist movement has spread to over one-third of interior India. The inflow of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh into the country continues unabated. Defence capabilities are considerably weakened. The delay in acquisition of fighter planes, submarines, artillery guns and accidents involving naval vessels are suspected to have been caused by sabotage.The Army is further weakened by factionalism, internal rivalry and indiscipline. There are signs of revival of militancy in Punjab. All mega-development projects in the country are stalled or delayed over various issues raked up by the NGO lobby or for want of environmental clearance. The economy is crippled. In Tamil Nadu, there was a set- back for the western agencies following the killing of LTTE leader Prabhakaran in the final phase of the civil war in Sri Lanka. However, more than a dozen militant Tamil nationalist organizations have come up in the state in recent years demanding an independent Greater Tamil Nadu. The anti-national lobby comprising of civil society groups and pseudo-secularists now just have to wait for an appropriate time and issue to ignite a final colour revolution-type uprising to achieve their ultimate goal. Manufacturing revolutions, like the Colour Revolutions in CIS countries. Colour revolutions are one of the main features of global political developments today. It is a term used by the media to describe political movements that developed in CIS (former USSR) countries and Balkan states during early 2000s which was described by some political analysts as a revolutionary wave. Participants in colour revolutions mostly used non-violent resistance or civil resistance by organizing rallies and protest programmes against governments seen as corrupt or authoritarian, and advocating democracy, they built up pressure for change. The colour revolutions are notable for the important role of NGOs in organizing the protest programmes. Such revolutions were successful in the form of a Bull dozer Revolution of Serbia in 2000,in Georgia’s Rose Revolution in 2003, in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution in 2004, in Lebanon’s cedar Revolution in 2005 and in Kyrgyzstan’s Tulip Revolution in 2005. In each such uprising, massive street protests followed disputed elections, demanding request for fresh elections leading to resignation of leaders considered as authoritarian by their opponents. These colour revolutions are organized by western countries, mainly by the USA, through their vast network of NGOs, spending millions dollars motivating local population of targeted countries to rise against their own political leadership to overthrow the existing regime and install a puppet regime owing allegiance to the imperialist block led by the US. Colour Revolutions are psycho-social operations of deception engineered by western intelligence agencies using millions of dollars to overthrow a legitimately elected regime which was considered as inimical to the interests of the US and its NATO allies. This is a regime change operation without the use of arms and tanks. This sophisticated operation requires an emotional and burning issue which could be exploited and manipulated to stir up public anger and emotions to incite the masses to rise in revolt to challenge the legitimacy of the ruling regime. Such an artificially created wave against the ruling regime is so pervasive and effective that even the intelligentsia fail to note the sinister designs behind this manipulated wave. 19

http://www.globalresearch.ca/colored-revolutions-a-new-form-of-regime-change-made-in-the-usa/27061 Delhi’s Mini-Colour Revolution What happened in Delhi during the assembly elections in 2013 was also nothing short of a mini colour revolution. Prior to the 2013-assembly elections in Delhi, all pre-poll surveys on the 2014 Lok Sabha elections had predicted a 6:1 sweep or a complete sweep for the BJP in Delhi and as far as the Delhi assembly elections were concerned, it was widely expected that helped by the Modi wave, the BJP will emerge as a clear winner. But the arrival of the newly formed Aam Admi Party (AAP) on the scene declaring a war on corruption and proclaiming to use its symbol ‘broom’ to sweep away all corrupt politicians just caught the imagination of the people and resulted in a spectacular surge of support for the Aam Admi Party. Within a matter of days, the new party just took Delhi by storm upsetting the calculations of all conventional political parties. The people who were terribly hurt and angered by the never-ending series of mega-scams in the country found a new messiah in Arvind Kejriwal who has come to cleanse our corruption-ridden political system. The white cap and the symbol ‘broom’ selected to market the revolution were also proved to be very catchy and effective. Though the BJP managed to emerge as the single largest party with 32 seats, 4 short of a majority, it was the AAP which stole the thunder by capturing 28 seats in its first ever electoral debut. It was a mini-colour revolution planned and executed by the western agencies in collusion with Sonia’s NAC and other NGO stalwarts in preparation for the final show-down in 2014 Lok Sabha elections. A colour revolution in India was actually planned much earlier. As a result of the disastrous policies followed by the Sonia-led NAC, the UPA-II government had already become quite unpopular by 2011. Mega scams like the 2G and CWG and the charges leveled against Sonia Gandhi by former Union Minister Dr.Subramanya Swami, implicating her direct involvement in such scams had all sullied the image of Sonia and the UPA government very badly and the UPA had started losing by-elections in different states. Meanwhile, Yoga Guru Ramdev’s campaign against corruption and black money was also gaining momentum and his speeches accusing the UPA government of encouraging corruption had started attracting massive gatherings. The UPA leadership, especially the NAC, was clearly unnerved. They knew that something had to be done urgently to divert the attention of the people from Ramdev’s campaign against corruption and black money and neutralize him. It was to this end a conspiracy was hatched by the NAC and other civil society activists like Medha Patkar, Arvind Kejriwal and Sisodia to use a genuine and respectable anti-corruption crusader like Anna Hazare to launch a ‘fast unto death’ agitation in Delhi demanding a stronger ‘Lokpal’ Bill. Anna Hazare started his indefinite fast in Delhi on April 5, 2011 under the banner of ‘India Against Corruption’ movement, demanding a stronger Jan Lokpal Bill incorporating the recommendations from a draft bill prepared by civil society activists Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Karnataka Lok Yukta Santosh Hegde. The agitation organized by the civil society activists, with the full support and backing of NAC members like Harsh Mander and Aruna Rai, was a bigger success than what was anticipated by the organizers. The civil society leaders using their vast network of activists across the country conducted sympathetic fast and protest demonstrations in around 100 cities in India in support of Anna Hazare’s ‘fast unto death’ agitation in Delhi. Hazare’s indefinite fast in Delhi and the nation-wide protest programmes in his support, coupled with its 24hour running commentary on TV channels had an electrifying effect on the nation because of the unprecedented projection it got from the press and the electronic media. The hysteria created by the media over Anna Hazare’s fast elevated him to the status of a national icon. Hazare’s fast was finally called off with effect from April 9th with the Centre, succumbing to pressure, conceding to the demand to set up a joint committee of senior ministers and civil society activists to draft a new bill to establish the institution of Lokpal. The civil society activists were overjoyed by the success of their experiment of using Anna Hazare to lead the ‘India Against Corruption’ movement in Delhi which had helped to take the sting out of the anti-corruption 20

drive of Baba Ramdev and diverted the attention of the people from corruption and black money to the demand for a stronger Lokpal Bill. Anna Hazare’s ‘fast unto death’ drama also helped the civil society activists to promote Arvind Kejriwal, who was closely associated with Hazare in his ‘India Against Corruption’ programme, as a genuine and honest anti-corruption crusader. Most importantly, the support that Anna Hazare received for his Delhi drama convinced the civil society activists and their masters in the west that in the background of various mega scams in India, the corruption has become such a sensitive and passionate issue and the growing anger of the people against the corrupt political class could be exploited to create a mass uprising in India if projected under a genuine and honest anticorruption crusader, like Anna Hazare. However, Anna Hazare did not know the truth that his ‘India Against Corruption’ movement was funded by the CIA-linked Ford Foundation and it was only a trial movement in preparation for a greater movement to be launched prior to the Lok Sabha elections in 2014 to stop Narendra Modi from becoming the next Prime Minister. (http://beyondheadlines.in/2011/08/it%E2%80%99s-official-%E2%80%93-us-based-ford-foundation-fundinganna%E2%80%99s-movement/) Efforts to rope in Anna Hazare to support anti-national movements. After the ‘fast unto death’ agitation of Anna Hazare in Delhi, the civil society activists wanted to take Hazare to Kashmir and North-East to cash-in on his newly attained image as a national icon and mobilize support for some anti-national movements like the separatist movement in Kashmir, agitations against mega dams in the North-East and the indefinite fast undertaken by Irom Sharmila of Manipur demanding withdrawal of Armed Forces Special Power Act (AFSPA) from North-East, etc, projecting them as genuine people’s movements. In fact, Akhil Gogoi of Assam, a Maoist supporter and a member of the 22-member core-committee of ‘India Against Corruption’ movement, while talking to the media on August 29, 2011, had declared that Anna Hazare’s first destination after his release from a hospital in Delhi will be Assam where he will address an antidam rally and then proceed to Manipur to extend his support to Irom Sharmila Charu, who was on an hunger strike for last 11 years demanding withdrawal AFSPA. Earlier Irom Sharmila had written a letter to Anna Hazare seeking his support to her campaign against AFSPA. Meanwhile Medha Patkar had announced a protest march from Kashmir to Manipur by civil society activists demanding withdrawal of AFSPA from Kashmir and North-East and had sought Hazare’s blessing and support for the same. Kashmiri separatist outfit Hurriyat Conference (moderate faction) had also written a letter to Hazare requesting him to take up the issue of unmarked graves in Kashmir with the authorities. However, Anna Hazare after his release from the hospital in Gurgaon on September 1, 2011 avoided attending any of such controversial meetings or programmes and went straight back to his village Relegan Siddhi in Maharashtra. Talking to the media people about those who are coming with requests for Team Anna’s support for various people’s movements, former IPS officer and a Team Anna activist Kiran Bedi had said on September 9, 2011 that they cannot take an immediate decision on such requests without studying all aspects of a particular problem/movement. On the contrary, on September 10, 2011, responding to a request for support from Pravin Gavakar, one of the leaders spearheading the agitation against the Jatapur nuclear power plant in Maharashtra, Arvind Kejriwal had publicly declared team Anna’s support for the said agitation without even consulting Anna Hazare. It is clear from this episode that Arvind Kejriwal had an altogether different agenda from the beginning. This agenda includes supporting all anti-national movements like Maoist movement, Sikh extremists, Kashmiri separatists, pro-LTTE Tamil nationalists and agitation against all mega development projects in India. It also explains why Anna Hazare and Kiran Bedi were forced to distance themselves from Arvind Kejriwal’s fake anti-corruption movement. 21

Formation of Aam Aadmi Party With the refusal of Anna Hazare and Kiran Bedi to support anti-national movements like separatist movement in Kashmir, Maoist movement in interior parts of India and agitation against mega development projects, there was a growing rift between Anna Hazare and Arvind Kejriwal over the future course of their anti-corruption drive. This rift was further widened with the decision of Arvind Kejriwal to float a political party on the anticorruption plank as advised by his civil society friends. The new political party was founded on November 26, 2012, with an eye on the Delhi assembly elections scheduled by the end of 2013. Conspiracy behind the formation of the new party The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is a creation of American intelligence. The US intelligence agencies knew very well that the scam-tainted UPA government was going to lose the 2014 elections and even more distressing for them was the news about the growing clout and popularity of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and the near certain possibility of Modi becoming the next prime minister of India. They knew about Modi’s reputation as a non-corrupt and efficient administrator and also about his authoritarian style of functioning. If such a person becomes the prime minister of India, it will be catastrophic to the interests of the USA. The US has an extremely hostile agenda for India. The US think-tanks believe that in the long-term interest of the USA, India should not survive as a united sovereign nation because of its potential to emerge as a possible super power at some point of time in future. Hence, the US along with its allies, has been supporting and promoting all separatist and secessionist movements in India with the ultimate objective of ensuring the break up of India into ten or fifteen independent countries. The US has spent billions of dollars in its efforts to stall our economic progress, in weakening India’s armed forces by delaying defence projects and promoting indiscipline, in building up a vast network of agents for destabilization activities and inducting its agents into key positions of power in various ministries and departments. If Modi becomes the prime minister, he will soon consolidate his power and lead India to a golden era of progress and prosperity and it will be impossible to remove him from power for a long time. He will also dismantle all the infrastructure built up by the western agencies in pursuit of their destructive agenda for India. Thus, all the efforts they made and the money they spent would go in vain and their balkanization goal for India would remain as a pipe-dream. Hence, it was a matter of utmost priority for the American intelligence to stop Modi in his track. The Aam Admi Party was formed only to stop Modi’s juggernaut. Despite all their public posturing against the Congress, the AAP is very much a part of the same NGO lobby that is led by Sonia Gandhi and funded and controlled by the US intelligence and church agencies. As admitted by senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh, Kejriwal, accompanied by Swami Agnivesh, had once met him in 2006 seeking his help to get a berth in the NAC. It is also reported that in 2004, he had used a letter obtained from Sonia Gandhi and addressed to the Prime Minister and Finance Minister to stop his transfer from Delhi. In fact, Kejriwal remains as a protégé of the Ford Foundation since 2002. The Ford Foundation is closely linked with the CIA and many CIA operatives are routinely sent on deputation to the Ford Foundation on special assignments. In the 2013 Delhi assembly elections, Arvind Kejriwal’s AAP was able to generate a proAAP wave through a colour revolution type mobilization of voters and emerged as the second biggest party after the BJP, capturing 28 seats. Failing to get a majority, when the BJP decided not to stake any claim to form a new government, it was AAP that came forward to form the next government with the unconditional support offered by the Congress party confirming the secret links between the two parties. The spectacular performance of Aam Admi Party in its electoral debut in Delhi on anti-corruption plank had generated a wave of support for the new party throughout India. The AAP being an NGO party, it was easy for the western agencies to create such a wave using their large network of activist NGOs in India, exploiting the prevailing anger and frustration of the people with the corrupt political class in India. Meanwhile, drawing confidence from the growing support for the APP from all across the country, top AAP leader Prashant Bhushan had announced that the AAP will contest the forthcoming Lok Sabha elections from 4oo seats. A pre-election survey on Lok Sabha elections conducted after the Delhi elections also indicated a change in the voters’ 22

preference in Delhi with the survey now predicting a sweep of six out of seven seats for the AAP in Delhi. Thus, it appeared that the western agencies may finally achieve their aim of sabotaging the chances of Modi becoming the next prime minister of India, through its colour (or broom?) revolution in India. There was so much goodwill and support for Arvind Kejriwal all over the country after the Delhi elections, that if he was a genuine anti-corruption crusader and provided a clean government in Delhi, he could have even become the next prime minister. But, basically he is a foreign agent, a fifth columnist and an anarchist which he proved himself within two weeks after being sworn in as the chief minister of Delhi. Kejriwal and his ministerial colleagues have betrayed all those who had kept their hope and faith in them by their controversial statements like extending support to Maoists and Kashmiri separatists and their other misdeeds when in power. Arvind Kejriwal’s street drama and his proclamation as being an anarchist had only invited all round condemnation. A fresh poll survey report announced on ‘Times Now’ channel on February 13 showed that the BJP is set to win 4 out of seven Lok Sabha seats from Delhi as against 3 for the AAP. Thus Kejriwal’s fall from grace was even quicker than his rise from the bottom. On February 14, 2014, Arvind Kejriwal resigned from his post as Chief Minister, following his failure to introduce the Jan Lokpal Bill in the State Assembly for want of majority support. However, his attempt to introduce the Lokpal Bill in the Assembly without Home Ministry’s nod was an unconstitutional act. Yet, he now tries to project himself as a martyr who had to step down from his position as his anti-corruption bill was not supported by the BJP and the Congress. He now says that he will concentrate on Lok Sabha elections. That is his original mission. The western agencies would now try to repeat a Delhi-style revolution at the national level, projecting Kejriwal as an anti-corruption crusader. Their calculation is that even if the AAP get 50 or 60 seats in the Lok Sabha, they could stop Modi from becoming the prime minister. They would be ready to accept even a BJP ministry, if it is headed by L.K. Advani or Sushama Swaraj, but not Modi. Because, Advani or Sushama-led government would not be much different from a Congress government and they can then go ahead with their sinister agenda. Arvind Kejriwal : A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothes. Date of birth---July16, 1968. Educational Qualification: B.Tech (Hons) in Mech. Engineering from IIT, Kharagpur. He worked as Assistant Manager with TISCO, Jamshedpur, from 1989 to 1992. Later he also worked for a few months with Missionaries of Charity founded by Mother Theresa in Kolkata. Arvind Kejriwal joined the IRS in 1993. Kejriwal set up an NGO called ‘Parivartan’ in December 1999. NGO ‘Parivartan’ received its first installment of foreign funds of $80000 from Ford Foundation in 2002. He took study leave from November 2000 to October 2002 after signing a bond. During this period he received full salary under the condition that he would not leave the service for at least three years, after returning from the study leave. In 2004, he again went on extraordinary leave. Though he was able to get into a prestigious service like the IRS, he never took his work seriously and remained on leave for long period devoting more time for his NGOs. How he was able to get foreign funds from various sources while still working as a government servant is a mystery. He resigned from service on February 20, 2006, to work full-time for the NGOs Parivartan and Kabir. Probably, he found that working for a foreign-funded NGO is much more lucrative than the IRS. However his resignation was accepted only on December 20, 2011 with effect from Feb 2006, after he paid the dues of Rs.9.27 lakh as per the bond he signed before proceeding on study leave. He received Ramon Magsaysay Award in 2006 for emergent leadership. The Magsaysay award for emergent leadership which was started in 2000, is funded by Ford Foundation. This award carries a cash component of $50000. 23

Shimrit Lee, a New York University researcher who was working with his NGO ‘Kabir’ in 2009-10 had inspired Kejriwal to launch his campaign for decentralization of power and the idea of setting up gram sabha and Mohalla sabha. She had also advised Kejriwal to organize colour revolution- type political mobilization in India. (http://ariseasia.blogspot.in/2012/10/ford-foundation-hivos-and-dutch-embassy.html) Kejriwal is linked with the US-based NGO ‘Awaaz’ which was funding civil disobedience movements in Egypt, Syria, Libya and Tunisia. Kejriwal shut down the website of both Parivartan and Kabir when it came under scrutiny in 2012. 30 Ford Foundation also removed all details of funds given to Kabir from its website in 2012. AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and NAC member Aruna Roy have campaigned against Kudankulam nuclear power plant in Tamil Nadu. (http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/kudankulam-protests-arvind-kejriwal-claims-meeting-activist-udhayakumarin-secret-266092) Kejriwal was cultivated by the American agencies since he received his first installment of funds $80000 in 2002. (http://www.indiaresists.com/is-kejariwal-an-american-agent/) He received funds from Dutch embassy knowing fully well that the government had imposed a ban on receiving any funds from Dutch embassy since 2002, because of misuse of money received from Dutch Embassy for anti-national activities. Kejriwal and his party support Maoists, Islamic terrorists, Kashmiri separatists, Muslim fundamentalists and anti-development agitations. He supports all such anti-national movements sponsored and funded by western agencies, as he is an American agent. (http://beyondheadlines.in/2013/12/cias-trojan-horse-enters-the-heart-of-india/) In the first week of November, 2013, Kejriwal met controversial Muslim cleric Moulana Tauqqeer Raza Khan in Bareilly as part of his efforts to woo Muslim voters before the Delhi elections in 2013. In 2007, Tauqueer Raza Khan had announced a reward of Rs.5 lakh for anyone who brought the severed head of Taslima Nasreen, the Bangladeshi writer, for her alleged defamatory writings on Islam. The Aam Admi Party had described Batla House shoot-out as a fake encounter and had sought a thorough probe into the incident at Jamia Nagar in Delhi in which a senior police officer and two Indian Mjahideen terrorists were killed. Only anti-national elements and foreign-funded NGOs like ANHAD and Sonia’s stooges like Digvijay Singh had dubbed the Batla House encounter as fake and sought a probe into the incident. Yasin Bhatkal, chief of Indian Mujahideen, who was arrested from Indo-Nepal border in 2013 had admitted that he was also present at the Batla House on that day and had left the place just before the said encounter. Shahzad Ahmed who was arrested by the Delhi police in connection with the Batla House encounter case was convicted by a Delhi court on July 25, 2013. Inspector M.C.Sharma who was killed in the encounter was a muchdecorated officer. He was awarded India’s highest peace-time military decoration ‘Ashoka Chakra’ on January 26, 2009. Arvind Kejriwal is mocking at the soul of such a brave patriot by asking for a probe into the Batla House encounter. 24

The Aam Aadmi Party had offered a ticket to Irom Sharmila Chanu of Manipur to contest 2014 Lok Sabha elections from Imphal. She has been on an indefinite fast for last 14 years demanding withdrawal of AFSPA from Manipur on behalf of various militant organizations in Manipur. Arvind Kejriwal, who has projected himself as a great anti-corruption crusader is not only very corrupt, but an anti-national who has been conspiring and collaborating with Ford Foundation and CIA to implement a treacherous scheme worked out by the western think tanks to ensure India’s balkanization. His much talked about ‘Swaraj’ scheme for empowering the Gram Sabhas and Mohalla Sabhas through decentralization of power is meant only to fool the public. Making Gram Sabhas and Mohalla Sabhas as bodies of self- governance is equivalent to giving them autonomy and self-rule. If implemented at the national level, as planned by the NAC, it will only lead to India’s balkanization. Linkages between various militant and secessionist movements, Church activists, and Civil Society Groups in India and Western Intelligence and other Agencies. All the various militant and secessionist movements in India, like the Maoist movement, separatist movement in Kashmir, Sikh militancy, Tamil nationalist movement in Tamil Nadu, ULFA in Assam and North-East insurgency are all supported and funded by the western agencies. Even the western governments are also sometimes found directly promoting such anti-national movements in India in violation all ethical and diplomatic norms. The following instances would confirm this fact PUCL-Islamic terrorist links In the name of fighting against all human rights violations, the People’s Union for Civil Liberty (PUCL) has been functioning like a front organization of all anti-national movements in the country like Maoists, Kashmiri separatists, jihadi terrorists and pro- LTTE outfits in Tamil Nadu. It was reported widely in the media that Kavita Srivastava, secretary, PUCL, and its Rajasthan unit's president, attended the 'National Political Conference' held in February 2009 in Calicut, organized by 'Popular Front of India' (PFI), an apex body of Islamic militant and fundamentalist outfits in South India. It is a known fact that the PFI which was promoting Islamic terror in Kerala, has now extended its influence to Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Goa and Uttar Pradesh. Maoist links with anti-development lobby Aabout 300 armed Maoists backed by a section anti-development activists and local villagers had attacked and crippled the operations of Panchpatmali bauxite mine of NALCO at Damanjodi in Koraput district of Orissa on April 12, 2009. In the daring attack, 14 people including 11 CISF jawans were killed and it also resulted in a 30% drop in bauxite production due to scaling down of duration of mining operations. It took one month for the NALCO to resume normal operations with enhanced security arrangements at the site. Maoist Links with Kashmiri separatists Maoists had never concealed their sympathy for the separatists in Kashmir. In a statement issued in August 2008 by Maoist spokesperson Azad, who was killed in an encounter in last July, had stated that the Central Committee of the CPI-Maoist unequivocally supported the Kashmiri people’s struggle for azadi and declared that one who does not support the people’s aspirations for freedom and independence can never be a democrat. The Central Committee also called upon the Maoists to support all the outfits fighting for azadi in Kashmir. In September 2010, the Maoists had called a bandh in six states in support of the just struggle of people in Kashmir. (http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main47.asp?filename=Ne061110incoldblood.asp) 25

Church-Maoist links The close links between the church leaders and the Maoists is an open secret. Now a Christian Bishop in Jharkhand, a state worst-hit by Maoist menace, has openly justified the cause of Maoist movement. In an interview published in the May 6, 2010 edition of ‘Sathyadeepam’, a Catholic weekly published from Kochi (Kerala), Bishop Charles Soreng of Hazaribagh, Jharkhand has admitted that the Maoists are sympathetic to the church and are supporting the priests in carrying out their missionary activities. He described the Maoists as honest people who are fighting against our corrupt system which marginalizes and renders the tribals as outcasts in the society. He said that the Maoists do not attack the Christian priests as the missionaries , like the Maoists, are also working for the rights and welfare of the poor. (http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=11184) Sabyasachi Panda, a top Maoist leader of Odisha had claimed responsibility for the killing of VHP leader Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati and four others at his Ashram in Kandhamal district in Odisha on August 23, 2008. Laxmanananda Saraswati not only opposed the conversion activities of the Christian missionaries, but also brought back many converted Christians back to Hinduism. Apparently, the Christian missionaries finally used the Maoists to eliminate Laxmanananda. One of the eight accused convicted in the case was a hard core Maoist. (http://www.sikhsangat.com/index.php?/topic/40171-we-killed-vhp-leader-swami-laxmanananda-maoists/) Support in London for anti-nuclear plant agitation in India. Anti-nuclear activists in Britain held a meeting at the House of Commons in London on October 20, 2012, expressing their solidarity with the protesters against the Kudankulam nuclear power plant in India and Hinkley Point in the UK. The meeting was hosted by MP Caroline Lucas and jointly organized by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and South Asia Solidarity Group. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Anti-nuke-activists-in-UK-express-concern-over-Kudankulam-Nplant/articleshow/16884280.cms) Foreigners support anti-nuclear agitation in India A German national, by name Sonnteg Reiner Hermann, was picked up by the Tamil Nadu police from a lodge in Nagercoil on February 26, 2012 for his role in mobilizing funds and support for the anti-nuclear stir in Tamil Nadu. After interrogation, he was deported back to Germany on February 28, 2012. In a similar incident on September 26, 2012, three Japanese nationals, including a woman, who arrived in Chennai en route to Kudankulam to participate in the anti-nuclear plant stir, were deported back on the same day. Fishing in the troubled waters, German physicist and Nobel Peace Laureate Hans Peter Duerr, who is also the Director Emeritus of Max-Planck Institute for Physics, Germany, said in Chennai on March 8, 2012, that nuclear energy could never be safe or sustainable option for the mankind and any claims to the contrary were nonsensical. All these instances clearly indicate a wider international conspiracy behind the protest movements and agitations against nuclear and other developmental projects in India. These instances show how the foreign nationals are directly helping or encouraging the anti-nuclear project agitation in India. Foreigners support Maoist movement In April, 2012, India has ordered the deportation of ten French citizens, including six women, for allegedly supporting Maoists in Bihar. They were found supporting Maoists while working with an NGO called Ekta Parishad of Unity Forum in violation of their tourist visas. The French citizens were detained by the police when they were found attending a meeting in the jungle on April 23d night, held by the Forum in support of Maoist rebels. (http://islamicterrorism.wordpress.com/category/maoistsnaxalites ) 26

Civil society-Maoist links In November 2002, Sandeep Pandey, noted civil society activist and Magsaysay award winner, attended the 7th Congress of the CPI (ML) in Bihar. (http://www.cpiml.org/liberation/year_2003/january/feature.htm) On February 6, 2010, the Special Task Force of Uttar Pradesh Police UP-PUCL's organizing secretary Seema Azad, her husband and another member for their links with Naxalites and Maoists and for allegedly them establish a base in Uttar Pradesh. arrested woman helping

Civil society activist and former correspondent of ‘The Statesman’ in Uttarkhant Prashant Rahi (50) was arrested by the Uttarkhand police on 22nd December, 2007 for his involvement in Maoist activities. According to Uttarkhand police records, he is not merely a Maoist activist, but the Zonal Commander of the CPI-Maoist. He was charged under various sections of IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). He originally hails from Maharashtra. Former bureau chief of “Dainik Bhaskar” Prafull Jha is a noted anthropologist, journalist and a civil society activist. He was arrested by Chhattisgarh police on Jauary 22, 2008 for his links with Maoist movement and involvement in the recovery of a cache of arms and ammunition seized by the police from Raipur. He is also accused of smuggling arms and buying vehicles for the Maoists and arranging transportation for Maoist leaders. Govindan Kutty , a civil society leader of Cochin and editor of pro-Maoist publication “People’s March”, was arrested by the Kerala police on December 19, 2007 for his links with Maoists. He was released on bail on February 24, 2008, but his publication ‘People’s March’ was banned on the ground of seditious writings. Vernon Gonsalves @ Vikram, a state committee member of Maharashtra unit of CPI (Maoist) who was arrested by the ATS, Maharashtra, in August,2007 and another top Maoist leader Arun Ferreira, r/o Bandra, Who was arrested by Nagpur police had both confessed to the police that they were originally activists of liberation theology movement. A number of human rights activists including Dr.Binayak Sen,Vice President of PUCL, have also been arrested in the past for their close links with the Maoist movement in the country confirming the close links between the Maoist movement and NGO and human rights net-work. Civil society-ULFA links A civil society activist and freelance journalist, Lachit Bordolai was also a member of the People’s Consultative Committee set up jointly by the Centre and the ULFA for peace negotiations to find a permanent solution to the Assam problem. However Bordolai was arrested by the Assam police on January 11, 2008 from Moranhat in Dibrugarh district of Assam. He was found linked with ULFA’s plan to hijack an aircraft from Guwahati airport, recovery of arms and ammunition from Rangia town in Assam in 2007 and collection of funds for ULFA. Bordolai is the secretary general of Manab Adhikar Sangram Samiti (MASS), a human rights outfit of Assam. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lachit_Bordoloi) PLA of Manipur, Maoists and Kashmiri militants. The two alleged members of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur, who were arrested by the Delhi police on October 1, 2011 had admitted to the police that their organization had rented some land in Myanmar for joint training of Maoists and Kashmiri militants. The training camp was to be organized in 2012. The two accused, N.Dileep Singh, 51, and Arun Kumar Singh Salam,36, had reportedly provided guerilla training to the 27

Maoists at their camp in Jharkhand forest in 2009 and in 2010. They also claimed to have supplied AK-47 rifles, pistols and grenades to the Maoists at their training camp in Jharkhand. They had also met Maoist commander Kishenji. They confessed that the PLA aimed to liberate Manipur through an armed struggle and their intention was to form a ‘strategic united front’ against their common enemy, the Indian government. In 2008, the PLA and Maoists had signed a joint declaration against the Indian government. Dileep Singh is the head of PLA’s external affairs while Salam is his deputy. (http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/article2519651.ece) Global Tamil Forum A new Tamil separatist movement called Global Tamil Forum (GTF) was formally formed at a meeting held at the House of Commons in London on February 24, 2010, with the main objective of seeking a separate sovereign state for Tamils in Sri Lanka. The concept of GTF was launched at a meeting of overseas Tamil activists in Paris in August, 2009. The GTF is formed by the merger of 15 LTTE-controlled overseas outfits such as British Tamil Forum, La Maison du Tamil Eelam of France, US Tamil Political Action Council, Canadian Tamil Congress, Norwegian Council of Eelam Tamil and Australian Tamil Congress drawn from 15 countries to revive the fight for a sovereign Tamil Eelam. Despite strong opposition from Sri Lankan authorities, the then foreign secretary David Miliband inaugurated the Global Tamil Forum meet and delivered the keynote address. Conservative leader William Hague and Liberal Democratic leader Ed Davey also addressed the meeting and extended their support to the GTF which indicated that the GTF enjoyed the goodwill and patronage of all the main political parties in the UK. Rev. Jesse Jackson who also attended the meeting was introduced to the gathering as a close friend of US President Obama. The GTF leaders later had a meeting with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The fact that the inaugural meeting of a militant Tamil separatist outfit like GTF was allowed to be held within the British Parliamentary Complex and that it was addressed by the British foreign secretary clearly showed that the British government not only approved the political agenda of the GTF, but it was unashamedly giving open support to the Tamil separatist movement in Sri Lanka. (http://www.demotix.com/news/259743/inauguration-global-tamil-forum-london#media-259738) Sikh genocide petition tabled in Australian Parliament On November 1st, 2012, Warren Entsch, the Chief Opposition Whip for the Liberal Party in Australia, had tabled a “1984 Sikh Genocide” petition before the House of Representatives. Hundreds of Sikhs had thronged the Capital city Canberra on that day and were present in the Parliament Galleries on the occasion when Entsch read out the petition. He thundered that “the intentional and deliberate nature of attacks on Sikh lives, properties and places of worship during the November 1984 riots makes them a crime of Genocide as per Article 2 of the UN Convention on Genocide.” The Sikh Genocide petition had the support of ‘Sikh for Justice’ and other human rights organizations. (http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/1984-sikh-riots-petition-tabled-in-australian-parliament/1/227369.html) Canada’s soft corner for Sikh militants Canadian Prime Minister Stephan Harper during his visit to India said on November 8, 2012 that Sikhs advocating for the creation of an independent Khalistan is not a crime. He said that the issue of violence and terrorism should not be confused with people’s political right to freedom of expression and their right to promote their political views. Above instances clearly indicate that it is not only Pakistan’s ISI, but certain western agencies have also been making all out efforts to revive militancy in Punjab since last more than a decade. 28

(http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/11/08/stephen_harper_pushes_back_on_indias_warnings_of_sikh_e xtremism.html) Comments Ayatollah Khomeni of Iran had once described the US as the biggest terrorist country in the world. He might have made that comment because of his extreme animosity towards the US. But in a way, he was only speaking the truth. (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/26/america-is-the-biggest-terrorist-state-world/) The US, in pursuit of its own misplaced strategic objectives, has been found promoting militancy and violence in most countries of the world. It is the only country in the world that used nuclear weapons against innocent civilians in Japan, not once but twice, resulting in the death/injuries to millions of people. 36 The violence and bloodshed it caused in Vietnam had shocked the humanity. After causing the break-up of the Soviet Union, its thirst for violence and bloodshed has only increased. The US hand can be clearly seen behind the unrest and violence in most parts of the world, including Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, former Soviet republics and even in India. Every militant and secessionist movement in India is supported and funded by the US and its allies. The US has thus become a threat to the world peace. The US and its NATO allies have their own concept about a new world order, which when established, would allow the US to remain as the only super power in the world, supported by its present allies and some more possible future allies from the CIS and Balkan states. All the other countries in the world have to accept this arrangement and remain subservient to the dominant position of the US under the new world order. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)) After the disintegration of the former Soviet Union, the US has been vigourously trying to realize its dream concept of a new world order. The colour revolutions in the CIS countries (former Soviet republics) and Balkan states, Arab spring in the Arab countries and unrest in Libya, Egypt and Sudan are all engineered by the western agencies led by the US to achieve their goal of a US-controlled Planet Earth. The second-best super power Russia, an emerging super power China and a possible future super power contender India are the three countries that still could create hurdles in the path of this American dream. The Soviet Union has already broken up. But, the US has been trying to further isolate Russia so as to prevent it from reemerging as a block leader of another grand alliance. The US efforts to wean away all former Soviet republics and lure them into the EU block are meant only to keep Russia isolated and weak. China on the other hand, after introducing the economic reforms in the post- Mao era, has been making steady and impressive economic progress and has already overtaken Japan to become the second biggest economy after the US. All efforts by the western agencies to prevent the rise of China has been frustrated by the communist regime in China with its tough stance and zero tolerance towards all such subversive activities of the west. India because of its corrupt leadership, dynastic politics, and policy paralysis remains as a banana republic. Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had made valiant efforts to stop the manipulative and interventionist tactics of the west to stall India’s growth and economic progress by promoting militant and secessionist movements in India. Her son Rajiv’s marriage to Italian citizen Sonia in 1968 was the greatest misfortune that struck India and Indira. Her second son Sanjay was mysteriously killed in a plane crash in Delhi in 1980. Though an inquiry was ordered into the said plane crash, it was never completed. Sanjay’s death forced Indira Gandhi to induct Rajiv into the party to assist her in party affairs. Indira Gandhi was killed by her own security guards in the aftermath of the ‘Operatio Blue Star’ conducted by the Army to evict the Sikh militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar. There was a clear instruction that at least one of the two security guards deployed for giving close- proximity protection to Indira Gandhi should be a non-Sikh, because of the prevailing ruffled sentiments of the Sikhs following the ‘Blue Star’ operation. Yet, at the time of her assassination, both the closeproximity guards were Sikhs. So, there was a major security lapse. Subsequently it was found that somebody 29

had made a last minute change in the duty roaster allowing the two Sikh personal security guards to be together on duty on that fateful day in violation of the instruction. Thus, the mystery deepens. It was never reported as to who made the change in the duty register. It was also reported that one month prior to the killing of Indira Gandhi, an American journalist had visited New Delhi to study about the likely repercussions in India in case if Indira Gandhi was assassinated in a terrorist attack. (Ref: Kao Boys of RAW, by B.Raman). However, inquiries conducted into this report, could not prove anything. But, one thing is clear that there was a conspiracy behind the assassination of Indira Gandhi. Indira’s eldest son Rajiv Gandhi was killed in a human bomb attack in May 1991. Though the attack was carried out by an LTTE suicide bomber, it is strongly suspected that the LTTE carried out the attack on the directive of the CIA which has been giving all possible help to the LTTE in the past. The LTTE did not gain anything from carrying out Rajiv’s assassination. On the contrary, it lost the goodwill and support of the entire Tamil population in Tamil Nadu following the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. DMK leader Karunanidhi, a strong supporter of LTTE, also distanced himself from the LTTE after the incident. Even Anton Balasingham, one of the top most leaders of LTTE had admitted in June, 2006, while giving an interview to the NDTV news channel, that Rajiv’s killing was a big mistake and profusely apologized to the people of India for the heinous crime they committed. However he did not elaborate, as to why they did it. Sonia, whose husband Rajiv Gandhi was killed by an LTTE suicide bomber, showed extraordinary sympathy for Rajiv’s assassins and got the death sentence of Nalini, one of the four death convicts, reduced to lifeimprisonment. By indefinitely delaying the execution of other three death convicts, she helped them also to get their sentence reduced to life term by the Supreme Court. The sympathy and support shown by Sonia Gandhi and her daughter Priyanka for Nalini, one of the convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi murder case, was responsible for generating a sympathy wave in support of Rajiv’s assassins and revival of support for the LTTE in Tamil Nadu. Rajesh Pilot, an influential senior Congress leader, was killed in a road accident on June 11th, 2000. Another influential Congress leader, Madhavrao Sindhya, died in a plane crash on October 1st, 2001. Thus, with major obstacles removed, Sonia Gandhi became the President of the Congress party in 1998. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) led by Sonia Gandhi was voted to power in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections and her nominee Manmohan Singh became the Prime Minister. The activities of Sonia Gandhi’ loyalists in the NAC during the ten-year rule of the UPA government has completely exposed their role in promoting all anti-national movements in India. But the intriguing question is why were the senior Congress leaders, who cannot be unaware of such anti-national activities of Sonia loyalists, silent about it? Why were our intelligence agencies silent about it? They spend a lot of time and money to keep tab on some minor operatives of foreign intelligence agencies. But when it is crystal clear to them that the NAC played a key role in promoting all such anti-national movements in India, why were they reluctant to act and initiate counter-measures to save the country from the sinister designs of the Western Agencies? It is very unfortunate that we cannot trust our intelligence agencies, security experts and our so-called nationalist leaders, any more with any conviction that they will do their best to ensure the safety and security of our country and the people. Hundreds of mega development projects in India, including some defence projects, involving investment of hundreds of thousands of crores of rupees are presently held up for want of environmental clearance from the government or NGO-sponsored agitations over issues like environmental pollution, ecological damage or livelihood issues. The work at Kudankulam Nuclear Power plant in Tamil Nadu which was to be commissioned in 2011, was indefinitely suspended in November, 2011 with the anti-nuclear power plant agitation becoming violent. Finally, in February 2012, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh himself had to lash out at some American and 30

Scandinavian NGOs for deliberately trying to sabotage the commissioning of the Kudankulam plant. Following the prime minister’s attack on the NGOs for trying to stall the Kudankulam plant, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalita took immediate steps to resume normal work at the plant by booking four NGOs for diversion of funds, cancelling the licenses of three NGOs for violation of FCRA rules and arresting some of the leaders spearheading the agitation. The work at the plant resumed from March, 2012. The Prime Minister and all other members of the cabinet knew very well that the various development projects were delayed and stalled by the NGO lobby with the support and approval of the NAC and Union ministers like Jairam Ramesh and Jayanti Natarajan. So, they all just kept quiet. NGO activists and Sonia loyalists like Aruna Roy (NAC member), Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan had extensively campaigned against the Kudankulam nuclear project in Tamil Nadu. The Prime Minister had to intervene to save the Kudankulam project only because of a threat from Russian President Putin who had conveyed his extreme displeasure to the PM over the delay in commissioning of the project due to the hurdles created by the church and certain western NGOs and his threat to withdraw from the project if it was not allowed to be commissioned. Arvind Kejriwal is a loyal soldier of Sonia Gandhi. Sonia Gandhi who helped her friend Bofors- scam accused Ottavio Quattrocchi to go scot-free from India with the booty he made from the scam, is also the kingpin behind all the mega scams in the country like the 2G spectrum, CWG and Coal Gate, as has been proved by Dr. Subramania Swami. The mega-scam kingpin Sonia Gandhi is also the mentor of the so-called anti- corruption crusader Arvind Kejriwal. Arvind Kejriwal had received foreign funds directly from World Bank and Dutch Embassy through his NGOs Parivartan and Kabir. He has also received crores of rupees from CIA-linked western agencies like Ford Foundation, Association for India’s Development, India’s Friends Association and Dutch NGOs Hivos and Panos . Kejriwal is not only a very corrupt person, but the biggest traitor of this country being the chosen man of the Ford Foundation-CIA evil alliance to break up India through his ‘Swaraj’ movement. Even a death penalty will not be sufficient to punish this sinner for his crimes against his own motherland. Such a man is now propped up by the American agencies and Sonia-led NGO lobby in the avatar of an anti-corruption crusader only to scuttle the chances of Narendra Modi becoming the prime minister of India. The CIA has already inducted many American agents into the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). N.Narayana Moorty, founder of Infosys, is on the Board of Directors of the Ford Foundation. His company gets 60% of its business from the US. That explains why V.Balakrishnan, ex-director of Infosys joined the AAP. Trilochan Shastri of IIM Bangalore who joined the AAP runs two NGOs, both funded by the Ford Foundation. Medha Patkar, who has joined the AAP, is another American agent who through her Narmada Bachao Andolan delayed the completion of the Narmada dam project by 25 years. She is also responsible for stalling the work of hundreds of mega development projects in different parts of the country. Meera Sanyal, who joined the AAP, runs an NGO called ‘Pradan’ which is funded by the Ford Foundation. Amartya Sen, Nobel laureate, who supports the AAP is a known American agent. Rajmohan Gandhi, Gandhiji’s grandson, who is the latest entrant to the AAP, was earlier a leader of the Moral Re-armament, an anti-communist movement linked to the CIA. Releasing the names of such American agents as new entrants to the AAP, the CIA is trying to create a wave in favour of the Aam Aadmi Party prior to the Lok Sabha elections. It worked in Delhi. But, at the national level, especially after Kejriwal’s disastrous performance as the chief minister of Delhi, it is unlikely to succeed at the national level. It is now for the people to decide whether India should have a prime minister who is honest and efficient, or allow India to rot and disintegrate as per the sinister designs of the US and its allies. (http://www.ibtl.in/column/1398/is-india-safe-what-is-ford-foundation/)

31