Law and Public Policy
Content
Law and Public Policy By Anthony J. Fejfar, B.A., J.D., M.B.A., Phd. (C)Copyright (2011 C.E.) By Anthony J. Fejfar and Neothomism, P.C., (PA) and The American People and Every Existant, as a Public Domain Copyright. If one starts with logic, or ideas, or even sense experience, one can reason to the fact that every existant has a natural right and or individual right of liberty which is anterior or prior to any contrary claims made by another. Once we see that each person or existant has an apriori individual right of liberty which is inalienable, irrevocable, non-waivable, and non-transferable, it is clear that such a person has a legal right or equitable right not to have that liberty illogically or unreasonably interfered with. Thus, each person or existant has a natural right and or individual right to the protection afforded by Sheriff’s Law, that is, The Law of Logic. The Law of Logic is based upon the reasonable premise that it is a crime or civil cause of action for any person or existant to unreasonably or illogically interfere with the liberty interest of another person or existant in a way which would in any way damage the latter person or existant. Thus, B cannot illogically interfere with the liberty interest of A in a way which damages A. Of course the liberty interest of A also includes A’s liberty or freedom to contract and own property as
long as A is acting in a reasonable manner. Thus, we can see that any governmental law or action, or the law or action of any other person or existant or organization, to be legally valid, must not violate Sheriff’s Law, that is, the Law of Logic. When a lawyer or other person makes an argument in court that such a illogical law violates the Principles of Sheriff’s Law, the common usage to to say that such an illegal action by government or another is Void for Public Policy, rather than referring to a Natural Right or Natural Law. Thus, when an advocate asserts that a law or governmental action is Void for Public Policy, what he or she or hae is really saying is that such a purported law or governmental action violates Sheriff’s Law, that is, the Law of Logic, also known as the National Security Act.
long as A is acting in a reasonable manner. Thus, we can see that any governmental law or action, or the law or action of any other person or existant or organization, to be legally valid, must not violate Sheriff’s Law, that is, the Law of Logic. When a lawyer or other person makes an argument in court that such a illogical law violates the Principles of Sheriff’s Law, the common usage to to say that such an illegal action by government or another is Void for Public Policy, rather than referring to a Natural Right or Natural Law. Thus, when an advocate asserts that a law or governmental action is Void for Public Policy, what he or she or hae is really saying is that such a purported law or governmental action violates Sheriff’s Law, that is, the Law of Logic, also known as the National Security Act.
