Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1) - Document No. 3
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel . Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/7/07. (vma, ) 2:2007cv00499 Alabama Middle District Court
Content
Noe v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
Doc. 3
Case 2:07-cv-00499-MEF-CSC
Document 3
Filed 06/07/2007
Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) WOODBURCK NOE, #148475,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-499-MEF [WO]
ORDER ON MOTION The plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel on June 6, 2007 (Court Doc. No. 2). The court notes that the facts underlying the plaintiff’s claims for relief are relatively simple and the law applicable to such claims is not complex. Moreover, the pleadings filed in this case establish that the plaintiff is capable of presenting the necessary elements of his claims to this court and fail to demonstrate that there are exceptional circumstances justifying appointment of counsel. See Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312, 1320 (11th Cir. 1999); Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993); Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1216 (11th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 7th day of June, 2007.
/s/ Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
Doc. 3
Case 2:07-cv-00499-MEF-CSC
Document 3
Filed 06/07/2007
Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) WOODBURCK NOE, #148475,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07-CV-499-MEF [WO]
ORDER ON MOTION The plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel on June 6, 2007 (Court Doc. No. 2). The court notes that the facts underlying the plaintiff’s claims for relief are relatively simple and the law applicable to such claims is not complex. Moreover, the pleadings filed in this case establish that the plaintiff is capable of presenting the necessary elements of his claims to this court and fail to demonstrate that there are exceptional circumstances justifying appointment of counsel. See Bass v. Perrin, 170 F.3d 1312, 1320 (11th Cir. 1999); Kilgo v. Ricks, 983 F.2d 189, 193 (11th Cir. 1993); Dean v. Barber, 951 F.2d 1210, 1216 (11th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Done this 7th day of June, 2007.
/s/ Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
