Public Schools - NIIC 2010
Content
2010 National Immigrant Integration Conference - Strategy Sessions Public Schools Sept. 30, 2010 The panel on public schools was focused specifically on English Language Learners (ELLs) and Education in the U.S. Much of the discussion (led by Raul Gonzalez) was about No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and how ELL youth are advantaged and disadvantaged by NCLB. This discussion included a description of NCLB and its strengths and weaknesses, and a discussion (largely informed by Roger Rice’s work with META) of what NCLB looks like in schools and on the ground when it is implemented. It also touched on parental and community involvement in educating the U.S. ELL population, and how philanthropists like Bob Hildreth can play a part. Panelists offered suggestions about what policy-makers, parents, and community members could do to improve educational opportunities and outcomes for ELL youth in U.S. schools. Report is organized into 3 parts and each part has a list of suggestions related to the topic. Sections are: 1. U.S. Education Policy 2. U.S. Education Policy on ground 3. Parental and Community Involvement U.S. Education Policy: Panelists discussed how children of immigrants in U.S. schools has increased dramatically and that many arrived in middle and late years of educational career which makes it difficult for them to acquire English, then Academic English, and to matriculate. With No Child Left Behind (NCLB) issues of testing and how to apply them fairly to these ELL youth, with their many challenges, come to the fore. NCLB has to do with accountability, choice, reform, and competition. The Race to the Top initiative increased competition among states and then forced those who receive it to implement education policies that the Fed. Government is behind. While our government is interested in “cutting edge ideas,” such as standards, accountability, and assessment—they do not work. For example, NCLB lets states set own standards which directly means children’s education will vary depending on which state they are in. Michigan sets high standards but kids in Michigan who do badly on the Michigan Test are viewed as poorly performing students even though they rank okay in terms of national standards. In Arkansas it’s the reverse. NCLB’s accountability system does not work because the way we measure success of systems doesn’t work (as in above). Thus, Obama’s focus on intervening with failing schools is pointless because we don’t have accurate way of measuring whether schools are successful or failing. Newer NCLB features include measuring “accumulative growth” of students from one year to next, which is improvement from old system, which compared 4th grades in 2010 to other 4th grades in a different year, which was arbitrary. Now students are compared to themselves to measure personal growth in educational achievement. -Newer NCLB aspects also include giving government power to shut schools down that don’t meet success standards. A school might be shut down and then reopened with entirely new teachers. No evidence that this will work, so hopefully this policy won’t become law. Future Suggestions: 1) We need to find out how to deal with teacher issue- while teacher-child interaction is most important element in education—still don’t know how to make teachers better.
Supported by the
2) Performance Pay? Get rid of tenure? (Argues money won’t make teachers do better- they already have incentive to do well) 3) New NCLB legislation will have more provisions for ELLs—there will be title for “diverse learners” which will provide more services for their education. We overall need more resources for ELL education. Research has shown that it does work to close schools down and open them up as dual language schools. More programs like this will be beneficial. Some measure of Accountability is ultimately good for ELL youth as it holds schools accountable for their education. Need improved measures of accountability. What NCLB and education for ELLs Looks Like in Schools? In Delaware and S. Carolina are school districts that are getting rid of ESL programs and bilingual instructors. Bilingual instructors are replaced with bilingual tutors. Similarly, in Florida parents were not allowed to enter school without ID card—threats to call ICE if parents entered w/o cards were made. Beyond volatile climate for ELL youth and families is inadequate services in schools. To education ELL youth may take twice as much as non-ELL youth, as a study Rice did for NYAC reported. Even if states reserve sufficient funds for ELL youth, by the time money moves from state to district, to school, or from state to mayor, to superintendent, to principal it may be have been reallocated significantly so funds for ELL Youth are spent on others “needs of the school.” One principal admitting using ELL funds she received from district to pay for different school needs. In Massachusetts’ Race to the Top report, a lot more money was allocated for spending on ELL/SPED students. Meanwhile Massachusetts has also fired many ELL teachers even though ELL student population is growing. This happened in Brockton. Very wide range of knowledge among principals and “ELL” teachers at different schools in U.S. Some teachers teach ELL Students with no training for doing so, and their principals have no knowledge of who their ELL Students are. Other principals know their ELL teachers, ELL students, and ELL parents very well and ensure that ELL teachers are very well trained. In one such school in Denver, Colorado, Rice found that principal was also up with the research on bilingual education. This shows that there is NO STANDARD for defining or requiring highly qualified ELL teachers. Kids need structured English learning all day given range of literacy levels of kids in U.S. schools. Even though some ELL students achieve incredible things early on (uses example of Somali kids moving from herding goats to writing short essays in 1st year of being in school), they still will not pass MEPA or MCAS standards and teachers won’t meet AYP requirements. Fears that given hostile anti-immigrant climate in U.S. and in U.S. schools, that Plyler V. Doe will be overturned. Mentions that it was a 4/5 decision but Supreme Court Justice Roberts noted the decision should be reversed and has overturned similar cases since. If it’s reversed, local districts will have power to decide on serious issues around educating ELL youth (and specifically, those without citizenship…) and
Supported by the
what standards are set for them. Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974 is only thing letting parents take schools to courts. Future Suggestions: 1)We need standard measure of quality ELL Teacher. 2) We need to make sure money for ELL populations is properly allocated despite the trickle down funding system (State-DistrictSchool) 3) “Don’t Mourn-Organize!”- Parents and communities need to organize against failing education system for ELLs- All successful organizing in schools started with parents. We need to form local advocacy groups and coalitions urgently Parental and Community Involvement: Obama administration is putting no money into Parental Educational Involvement-it is a blind spot in our administration and in education reform. Parental Involvement is a focus in NCLB but policy-makers still don’t know how to involve communities and parents in accountability testing. Even though parents have “choice” in deciding which schools to send kids to—not very active in this process. Hildreth’s FUEL is an example of how the community can be involved in education of ELL population – he helps parents save money for kids’ future education and then matches the money they save, in addition to supplying knowledge, networks, leadership activities, and access to academic after school activities to ELL kids and parents in East Boston. FUEL also works on helping kids in E. Boston prepare for the community college entrance exams- ACUPLACER- which improves chances of success in community college and saves colleges and families money in long run by limiting expenses of remedial courses. Students in FUEL have received full scholarships to colleges like UMASS, Amherst. Future Suggestions: 1) Media should identify which schools are working and which ones aren’t and then disseminate this information for parents to increase their involvement. 2) In1930’s, Mexican parents organized against school that isolated Mexicans, similar thing occurred in 1940s…-ALL major Ed. Reform in US began with parent organizing—we need more parent organizing! 3) We need more dual language schools in poor communities like Lawrence which would include ELL Latinos and English speaking Latinos in one classroom (this too requires advocacy). 4) Need more programs like FUEL to increase financial, social, and human capital that immigrant families need for college attainment. 5) Have to help parents demand an education for their kids (a “match” program is a way to add to parents’ motivation to help kids receive good education). 6) Need to form more partnerships in community (FUEL operations through partners with after-school programs, banks, and community organizations). Panelists: Moderator: Margie from Migration Policy Institute 1. Raul Gonzales, head of Legislative Affairs and Ed. Policy at the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) 2. Roger Rice, Lawyer and long-time defender of ELL student rights and the head of META in Boston 3. Bob Hildreth, Philanthropist and founder of Families United in Educational Leadership (FUEL)
Supported by the
Supported by the
2) Performance Pay? Get rid of tenure? (Argues money won’t make teachers do better- they already have incentive to do well) 3) New NCLB legislation will have more provisions for ELLs—there will be title for “diverse learners” which will provide more services for their education. We overall need more resources for ELL education. Research has shown that it does work to close schools down and open them up as dual language schools. More programs like this will be beneficial. Some measure of Accountability is ultimately good for ELL youth as it holds schools accountable for their education. Need improved measures of accountability. What NCLB and education for ELLs Looks Like in Schools? In Delaware and S. Carolina are school districts that are getting rid of ESL programs and bilingual instructors. Bilingual instructors are replaced with bilingual tutors. Similarly, in Florida parents were not allowed to enter school without ID card—threats to call ICE if parents entered w/o cards were made. Beyond volatile climate for ELL youth and families is inadequate services in schools. To education ELL youth may take twice as much as non-ELL youth, as a study Rice did for NYAC reported. Even if states reserve sufficient funds for ELL youth, by the time money moves from state to district, to school, or from state to mayor, to superintendent, to principal it may be have been reallocated significantly so funds for ELL Youth are spent on others “needs of the school.” One principal admitting using ELL funds she received from district to pay for different school needs. In Massachusetts’ Race to the Top report, a lot more money was allocated for spending on ELL/SPED students. Meanwhile Massachusetts has also fired many ELL teachers even though ELL student population is growing. This happened in Brockton. Very wide range of knowledge among principals and “ELL” teachers at different schools in U.S. Some teachers teach ELL Students with no training for doing so, and their principals have no knowledge of who their ELL Students are. Other principals know their ELL teachers, ELL students, and ELL parents very well and ensure that ELL teachers are very well trained. In one such school in Denver, Colorado, Rice found that principal was also up with the research on bilingual education. This shows that there is NO STANDARD for defining or requiring highly qualified ELL teachers. Kids need structured English learning all day given range of literacy levels of kids in U.S. schools. Even though some ELL students achieve incredible things early on (uses example of Somali kids moving from herding goats to writing short essays in 1st year of being in school), they still will not pass MEPA or MCAS standards and teachers won’t meet AYP requirements. Fears that given hostile anti-immigrant climate in U.S. and in U.S. schools, that Plyler V. Doe will be overturned. Mentions that it was a 4/5 decision but Supreme Court Justice Roberts noted the decision should be reversed and has overturned similar cases since. If it’s reversed, local districts will have power to decide on serious issues around educating ELL youth (and specifically, those without citizenship…) and
Supported by the
what standards are set for them. Equal Education Opportunity Act of 1974 is only thing letting parents take schools to courts. Future Suggestions: 1)We need standard measure of quality ELL Teacher. 2) We need to make sure money for ELL populations is properly allocated despite the trickle down funding system (State-DistrictSchool) 3) “Don’t Mourn-Organize!”- Parents and communities need to organize against failing education system for ELLs- All successful organizing in schools started with parents. We need to form local advocacy groups and coalitions urgently Parental and Community Involvement: Obama administration is putting no money into Parental Educational Involvement-it is a blind spot in our administration and in education reform. Parental Involvement is a focus in NCLB but policy-makers still don’t know how to involve communities and parents in accountability testing. Even though parents have “choice” in deciding which schools to send kids to—not very active in this process. Hildreth’s FUEL is an example of how the community can be involved in education of ELL population – he helps parents save money for kids’ future education and then matches the money they save, in addition to supplying knowledge, networks, leadership activities, and access to academic after school activities to ELL kids and parents in East Boston. FUEL also works on helping kids in E. Boston prepare for the community college entrance exams- ACUPLACER- which improves chances of success in community college and saves colleges and families money in long run by limiting expenses of remedial courses. Students in FUEL have received full scholarships to colleges like UMASS, Amherst. Future Suggestions: 1) Media should identify which schools are working and which ones aren’t and then disseminate this information for parents to increase their involvement. 2) In1930’s, Mexican parents organized against school that isolated Mexicans, similar thing occurred in 1940s…-ALL major Ed. Reform in US began with parent organizing—we need more parent organizing! 3) We need more dual language schools in poor communities like Lawrence which would include ELL Latinos and English speaking Latinos in one classroom (this too requires advocacy). 4) Need more programs like FUEL to increase financial, social, and human capital that immigrant families need for college attainment. 5) Have to help parents demand an education for their kids (a “match” program is a way to add to parents’ motivation to help kids receive good education). 6) Need to form more partnerships in community (FUEL operations through partners with after-school programs, banks, and community organizations). Panelists: Moderator: Margie from Migration Policy Institute 1. Raul Gonzales, head of Legislative Affairs and Ed. Policy at the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) 2. Roger Rice, Lawyer and long-time defender of ELL student rights and the head of META in Boston 3. Bob Hildreth, Philanthropist and founder of Families United in Educational Leadership (FUEL)
Supported by the
