Smart Garage Door System
Content
Smart Garage Door System
May03-03 Client: Sr. Design Faculty Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Dr. Ralph Patterson Team Members: Dave Barto Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson July 18, 2013
Presentation Outline
Introductory Materials
Problem Statement Operating Environment Intended Uses/Users Assumptions and Limitations End Product Description
Resources and Schedules
Resource Requirements Schedules
Closing Materials
Project Evaluation Commercialization Recommendations for Additional Work Lessons Learned Risk and Risk Management Closing Summary
Project Activity Description
Accomplishments Approaches Definition Activities Research Activities Design Activities Implementation Activities Testing and Modification Activities Other Significant Activities
Problem Statement
General Background:
Auto-Closing Garage Door System Convenience for homeowner Home security
Technical Issues:
Remote transmitting State of the Garage Door Signal Processing Operation of Garage Door Opener External Lighting Circuit
Operating Environment
Located Inside Garage Operational at (–) 40 to 120 Degrees Fahrenheit Conditions Used with Chain or Screw Drive Openers Residential Systems Only Two-Door Garages
Intended Users/Uses
Intended Users:
Home Owners Family or Neighbors
Intended Uses:
Automatic Closure of the Garage Door ON/OFF Capabilities NOT intended for Commercial or Industrial Use
Assumptions and Limitations
Assumptions:
Installed on Residential Grade Openers Only Power Source Maintained by the End User Obstruction Sensors Previously Installed
Limitations:
Door Opener must have external contacts Maximum of Two Garage Doors
End Product Description
Features:
Rail-type Residential Grade Garage Door Systems Adjustable timer for Automatic Closure Two Garage Door Operation Override mode for leaving door open without timer Can be retrofitted for state-controlled openers
What Has Been Done?
Accomplishments:
Defined the Problem Determined the Technical Design Located and Received all Parts Finished all Necessary Documentation Implementation of the Design Testing Final Documentation Oral Presentation to Industrial Review Panel
Possible Approaches
Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing Different Types of Sensors for Input
Pressure Pad for Tire Contact Limit Switches Magnetic Switches IR (Obstruction) Sensor Light Sensor
Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry
Solution Approach
Scenarios:
Leaving Garage Returning Home Desire to have the Garage Door Open
Sensing:
Contact Switches Light Sensors
Final Project Definition
Functionality:
Operative in any environment Timers
Signal Processing
Door Timer Lights Timer
Micro-Controller (HC11) Power Relays
Four-button Controller
Transmitter/Receiver Wall Mounting
Safety and Environmental
Light Sensor Contact Limit Switches
Research Activities
Research:
Internet and Advisors
Transmitter/Receiver – located and purchased online Relays – located and purchased online
Micro-controllers – used ISUs HC11 Sensors – Door Store, Previous Lab Projects
Free Door Opener:
Sears 1/3 H.P. Rail type - Chain driven
Manufactured in 1992 Not Compatible with Recent Obstruction Sensors
Technical Approach
Garage Door Scenarios:
Input
Remote Controller Signal
Main Controller Signal
Keypad Signal
Open Indefinitely
Open Indefinitely
Immediate Close
Open and Cycle Close
Hard Wired Logic Circuit vs. MicroController Design vs. Purchasing a Transmitter/Receiver Unit
Technical Design
Technical Design
Technical Design
General Lighting Circuit
Technical Design
Implementation Activities
Problems Encountered:
Downloading Code to Motorola HC11E9 EVBU Board
Switched to Motorola F1HC11 Board that was used in Cpr E 211. Part Built into Genie Systems. Changed to Contact Limit Switch. Eliminate Obstruction Sensor as input to SGDS because of FCC Regulation in 1993.
Important Part of Magnetic Sensors Missing
Obstruction Sensors Not Compatible with Door Opener
Testing and Modifications
Testing:
SGDS Broken into 7 Different Individual Tests Tested as whole afterwards
Test 1 – Transmitter and Receiver:
Apply Power, Measure Output at Relay
Test 2 – Momentary Push Buttons:
Figure out Wiring Scheme
Test 3 – Relays:
Apply 5V to Coil and use Ohmmeter to test the resistance between NO and the Com terminals
…Testing and Modifications
Test 4 – Garage Door Opener:
Power Opener and Determine Terminal Functionality
Test 5 – Light Detection Circuit:
Build Circuit from Schematic and test with a flashlight to see if the Voltage Signal disappears when incandescent light is visible.
Test 6 – Contact Limit Switch:
Wire a series circuit and make sure the NO circuit changes to closed the the contact is closed.
Test 7 – Micro-Controller:
Download the program to the hardware, send in input signals with a source to different pins and check the output for a signal.
Other Significant Project Activities
Relay Discussions with Jason Boyd Reporting and Necessary Documentation
Personnel Effort Budget
Final Personnel Efforts Personnel Name Total Hours Dave Barto 137 Kyle Leinen 131 Ben Molayal 133 Brodie Pederson 162 Total 563
Dave Barto 24%
Dave Barto Brodie Pederson 29% Kyle Leinen 23% Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson Ben Molayal 24%
Other Required Resources
Other Required Resources Item Cost Printed Documentation $20.00 Parts $0.00 Receptacle Box $0.00 Receptacle $0.00 120 VAC Two-Way Switch $0.00 Wire $0.00 Lumber for demo stand $0.00 Paint $0.00 Total $0.00 Grand Total $20.00
Financial Budget
Financial Budget Item Poster Parts Wiring (Wire, Relays, Op Amps) Sensors Micro Controller Receivers/Transmitters Total Total Estimated Parts Cost Labor (@$15/hr) Total Estimated Cost Cost $60.00 $14.32 $38.50 $0.00 $48.00 $100.82 $160.82 $8,445.00 $8,605.82
Schedules – Original Estimate
Schedules - Actual
Project Evaluation
Milestones:
Problem Definition (Fully Met) Research (Fully Met) Technology Selection (Fully Met) Finalize Physical Design Plan (Fully Met) Acquire All Parts (Fully Met) Implementation of SGDS (Fully Met) Testing and Revisions (Fully Met) Documentation (Fully Met)
Commercialization
Capable of being fully commercialized
Useable on most garage doors Design at different consumers Offer unique enhancements $100.82 Set at $300
Adaptable
Current Production Cost
Current Street Selling Price
Cost Savers / Overhead Reduction
Custom Design Components Ex. Receiver / Transmitter
Recommendation for Additional Work
Design Transmitter/Receiver Design for Commercial Use Design for more than two garage doors Design for non-rail-type systems Security System Integration
Lessons Learned
No Delays Well Defined Project Specifications Communication Time Management Skills Resource Utilization
Risks and Risk Management
Loss of a group member Parts are not available Accidental damage to parts Too many team donations
Closing Summary
General Problem
Auto-Closing Garage Door System Convenience for homeowner Home security
Approaches Considered
Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing Different Types of Sensors for Input
Pressure Pad for Tire Contact Switch Light Sensor
Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry
Closing Summary – continued
Resultant Solution
Purchased a Transmitter/Receiver Used Signal Processing
Motorola HC11 Power Relays
Contact Limit Switch Light Sensor
Types of Sensors used
Used Opener with Exterior Contacts
Summary
Technologies Role
Societies Dependence Human Error Need of Smart Garage Door System
Revolutionary Utilization of Sensory Input Interprets User’s Needs Offers Homeowners Peace of Mind
Questions?
May03-03 Client: Sr. Design Faculty Advisors: Dr. John Lamont Dr. Ralph Patterson Team Members: Dave Barto Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson July 18, 2013
Presentation Outline
Introductory Materials
Problem Statement Operating Environment Intended Uses/Users Assumptions and Limitations End Product Description
Resources and Schedules
Resource Requirements Schedules
Closing Materials
Project Evaluation Commercialization Recommendations for Additional Work Lessons Learned Risk and Risk Management Closing Summary
Project Activity Description
Accomplishments Approaches Definition Activities Research Activities Design Activities Implementation Activities Testing and Modification Activities Other Significant Activities
Problem Statement
General Background:
Auto-Closing Garage Door System Convenience for homeowner Home security
Technical Issues:
Remote transmitting State of the Garage Door Signal Processing Operation of Garage Door Opener External Lighting Circuit
Operating Environment
Located Inside Garage Operational at (–) 40 to 120 Degrees Fahrenheit Conditions Used with Chain or Screw Drive Openers Residential Systems Only Two-Door Garages
Intended Users/Uses
Intended Users:
Home Owners Family or Neighbors
Intended Uses:
Automatic Closure of the Garage Door ON/OFF Capabilities NOT intended for Commercial or Industrial Use
Assumptions and Limitations
Assumptions:
Installed on Residential Grade Openers Only Power Source Maintained by the End User Obstruction Sensors Previously Installed
Limitations:
Door Opener must have external contacts Maximum of Two Garage Doors
End Product Description
Features:
Rail-type Residential Grade Garage Door Systems Adjustable timer for Automatic Closure Two Garage Door Operation Override mode for leaving door open without timer Can be retrofitted for state-controlled openers
What Has Been Done?
Accomplishments:
Defined the Problem Determined the Technical Design Located and Received all Parts Finished all Necessary Documentation Implementation of the Design Testing Final Documentation Oral Presentation to Industrial Review Panel
Possible Approaches
Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing Different Types of Sensors for Input
Pressure Pad for Tire Contact Limit Switches Magnetic Switches IR (Obstruction) Sensor Light Sensor
Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry
Solution Approach
Scenarios:
Leaving Garage Returning Home Desire to have the Garage Door Open
Sensing:
Contact Switches Light Sensors
Final Project Definition
Functionality:
Operative in any environment Timers
Signal Processing
Door Timer Lights Timer
Micro-Controller (HC11) Power Relays
Four-button Controller
Transmitter/Receiver Wall Mounting
Safety and Environmental
Light Sensor Contact Limit Switches
Research Activities
Research:
Internet and Advisors
Transmitter/Receiver – located and purchased online Relays – located and purchased online
Micro-controllers – used ISUs HC11 Sensors – Door Store, Previous Lab Projects
Free Door Opener:
Sears 1/3 H.P. Rail type - Chain driven
Manufactured in 1992 Not Compatible with Recent Obstruction Sensors
Technical Approach
Garage Door Scenarios:
Input
Remote Controller Signal
Main Controller Signal
Keypad Signal
Open Indefinitely
Open Indefinitely
Immediate Close
Open and Cycle Close
Hard Wired Logic Circuit vs. MicroController Design vs. Purchasing a Transmitter/Receiver Unit
Technical Design
Technical Design
Technical Design
General Lighting Circuit
Technical Design
Implementation Activities
Problems Encountered:
Downloading Code to Motorola HC11E9 EVBU Board
Switched to Motorola F1HC11 Board that was used in Cpr E 211. Part Built into Genie Systems. Changed to Contact Limit Switch. Eliminate Obstruction Sensor as input to SGDS because of FCC Regulation in 1993.
Important Part of Magnetic Sensors Missing
Obstruction Sensors Not Compatible with Door Opener
Testing and Modifications
Testing:
SGDS Broken into 7 Different Individual Tests Tested as whole afterwards
Test 1 – Transmitter and Receiver:
Apply Power, Measure Output at Relay
Test 2 – Momentary Push Buttons:
Figure out Wiring Scheme
Test 3 – Relays:
Apply 5V to Coil and use Ohmmeter to test the resistance between NO and the Com terminals
…Testing and Modifications
Test 4 – Garage Door Opener:
Power Opener and Determine Terminal Functionality
Test 5 – Light Detection Circuit:
Build Circuit from Schematic and test with a flashlight to see if the Voltage Signal disappears when incandescent light is visible.
Test 6 – Contact Limit Switch:
Wire a series circuit and make sure the NO circuit changes to closed the the contact is closed.
Test 7 – Micro-Controller:
Download the program to the hardware, send in input signals with a source to different pins and check the output for a signal.
Other Significant Project Activities
Relay Discussions with Jason Boyd Reporting and Necessary Documentation
Personnel Effort Budget
Final Personnel Efforts Personnel Name Total Hours Dave Barto 137 Kyle Leinen 131 Ben Molayal 133 Brodie Pederson 162 Total 563
Dave Barto 24%
Dave Barto Brodie Pederson 29% Kyle Leinen 23% Kyle Leinen Ben Molayal Brodie Pederson Ben Molayal 24%
Other Required Resources
Other Required Resources Item Cost Printed Documentation $20.00 Parts $0.00 Receptacle Box $0.00 Receptacle $0.00 120 VAC Two-Way Switch $0.00 Wire $0.00 Lumber for demo stand $0.00 Paint $0.00 Total $0.00 Grand Total $20.00
Financial Budget
Financial Budget Item Poster Parts Wiring (Wire, Relays, Op Amps) Sensors Micro Controller Receivers/Transmitters Total Total Estimated Parts Cost Labor (@$15/hr) Total Estimated Cost Cost $60.00 $14.32 $38.50 $0.00 $48.00 $100.82 $160.82 $8,445.00 $8,605.82
Schedules – Original Estimate
Schedules - Actual
Project Evaluation
Milestones:
Problem Definition (Fully Met) Research (Fully Met) Technology Selection (Fully Met) Finalize Physical Design Plan (Fully Met) Acquire All Parts (Fully Met) Implementation of SGDS (Fully Met) Testing and Revisions (Fully Met) Documentation (Fully Met)
Commercialization
Capable of being fully commercialized
Useable on most garage doors Design at different consumers Offer unique enhancements $100.82 Set at $300
Adaptable
Current Production Cost
Current Street Selling Price
Cost Savers / Overhead Reduction
Custom Design Components Ex. Receiver / Transmitter
Recommendation for Additional Work
Design Transmitter/Receiver Design for Commercial Use Design for more than two garage doors Design for non-rail-type systems Security System Integration
Lessons Learned
No Delays Well Defined Project Specifications Communication Time Management Skills Resource Utilization
Risks and Risk Management
Loss of a group member Parts are not available Accidental damage to parts Too many team donations
Closing Summary
General Problem
Auto-Closing Garage Door System Convenience for homeowner Home security
Approaches Considered
Building a Transmitter/Receiver from scratch vs. Buying a Fabricated Unit Building a “Hard-Wired” Logic Circuit vs. Signal Processing Different Types of Sensors for Input
Pressure Pad for Tire Contact Switch Light Sensor
Using Openers with Exterior Contacts vs. Determining the Internal Circuitry
Closing Summary – continued
Resultant Solution
Purchased a Transmitter/Receiver Used Signal Processing
Motorola HC11 Power Relays
Contact Limit Switch Light Sensor
Types of Sensors used
Used Opener with Exterior Contacts
Summary
Technologies Role
Societies Dependence Human Error Need of Smart Garage Door System
Revolutionary Utilization of Sensory Input Interprets User’s Needs Offers Homeowners Peace of Mind
Questions?
