Syllabus - Law 138, Corporation Law (Jacinto)

 

SCHEDULE OF CASES

CoRPORATIoX LAW

CHAPTERS I AND II '

.

Union Glass v. SE C Abejo v. dela Cryz Magalad'v.PremiereFinancingCorporation(209SCRA26I) CIR v. Club FiliPino S 6781 Manuel R. Dulay Ent' v ' CA (225 i,t-Dc;-philippine Veterans Bank (192 SCRA 257) 668) Pioneer Insuiance v' CA (175 SCRA

CHAPTERrrl:

FOR}TATION

RGANIZATION

Philips Export BV' v' CA (206 S 151) ^ 610) Lyceum of th" Phils' v' CA (219 S e t a l ' ( 4 6 2 SCRA 3 6 ) CA' v ' a l ' P.C.Javier & Sons, Inc', et Malabang v. Benito Harril v. Davis Hall v. Piccio ABC v. Standard Products Crareson v' Intl Bus' Machines Sa-h'atierra v' Garlitos, et al' S 389) Chiang Kai Shek School v' CA (I72 452) 'i Lozano v. d'elos Santos (274 S Inc' (3 17 S 2'3) phil. Industries, Geai ir,g fi"t Lim Tong ;;". Intl Expiess Travel v' CA (343 S 674\ v' CA. (276 S 68 1) Loyola Grand Villas Homeo'"vners Fleischer r'. Botica Noiasco r'' Ei Hogar Government of the Philippines

Stockholders of T' Guanzon r'' RD Caram v. CA PalaY, nc' v' Clave ( 4 5 0 SCRA 1 6 9 ) J.G. Summit Hold'ings, nc' v' CA Marvel Bldg' v' David 266) Magsaysayllabrador v ' CA (180 SCRA SCRA 698) Indo Phii iextile Miils v' Calica (205 Jacinto v . CA (198 SCRA 2Il) SCRA 1 4 9 ) Concept Builders, Inc' v' NLRC (257 ClaParols v' CI R Villa ReY ReYTransit Transit v' Ferrer F r a n c i s c o ( 4 3 3 SCRA 2 T 3 l s e c o s a , e t a l . v . H e i r s o f Erwin S u a r e z Yu v. NLRC (245 S 134) Cease v . CA DelPher Trade v' CA Garnett v. Southern RailwaY Inc' (453 SCRA 555) Jardine Davies, Inc' v' JRB Realtl" KoPPel v' Yatco Liddel v' CI R La Campana Coffee Factory v' Kaisahan CHAPTER V . PROMOTER'S CONTRACTS McArthur v' Times Printing CagaYan Fishing v' Sandiko Builders Duntile v' Dunn Rizal Light v' PSC and Morong Electric

 

Quaker Hi1lv. Parr oldDomi',io,'CopperMiningand.SmeltingCo.v.Bigeiow CTIAPTER VI - CORPORATE POWERS RP v. Acoje Mining Natl Powlr CorP' v ' Vera (170 S 721) Government of the Philippines v' El Hogar Pirovano v. Delarama Harden v. Benguet

Ramirez v. Orientalist Co' & Fernandez T'oPezv. Ericta SCRA 147) Expert Travel & Tours, Inc' v' CA (459 Citibank NA v. Chua (220 SCRA 75 ) Prime white cement v ' iAc (220 scRA 103) BoYer-Roxasv. CA (211 SCRA 470) EP-GConstruction v' CA (2i0 SCRA 2i0)

BenguetElectricCooperativev.NLRC(209SCRA55) and construction contpanr'' woodchild Holding", i.r.. v. Roxas Electric Inc. (436 SCRA 235\ Yu Chuk v. Kong Li Po SCRA 329) Lapulapu FounJation, Inc' v' CA (421 Kalaw Boara of Liquidators v' Heirs of M otor Zasrboanga-Transportation v' Bachrach Board of SMB Workers v' Ta n Johnston v. Johnston Ponce, et al. v. Encarnacion Gokongwei v. SE C Detective & Protective Bureau v' Cloribel Roxas v. dela Rosa CamPbell Y. trse1ar,nc' v ' Ma-ao Sugar a1.v Dela Rama, e t a1. In Re: Giant Portland Cement State ex- rel Everett Trust v' Pacific Wa x Alejandrino v. de Leon Abercrombie v- Davis Everett v. Asia Banking Mackin v. Nicoliet Hotel NIDC v. Aquino Ringling v. Ringling Bros' E.K. Buck Retail Store v' Harket Clark v. Dodge Gottschalk v. Avalon RealtY Mutual Sherman & Eilis r'. Indiana Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel

CII{PI.ERVIII-DUTIESoFDIRECTORS^ONTRoLLINGSTOCKHOLDERS Otis & Co. v. PennsYlvania & Co ' Montelibano v. Bacolod Murcia Litwin v. Allen Walker v. Man Steinberg v. Velasco Barnes v. Andrews Bates v. Dresser Palting v. San Jose Petroleum Mead v. McCullough Government v. E1 Hogar Barreto v. La Previsora

 

Kerbs v. Cajifornia Eastern Strong v. RePide TaYlor v. Wright Singer, et a1. v'Carlisle trving Trust v' Deutsch, et aI ' Litwin v. Allen Globe Woolen v' Utica Ga s Corporation Insurance Shares v' Northern Fiscal CHAPTER D( - INSPECTION Pardo v. Hercules Lumber Gonzales v. PNB Veragrth v. Isabela Sugar Co ' Gokongrvei v. SEC CIIAPTER X - DERTVATNTE SUITS Evangetsta, et al' v' Santos RePublic Bank v' Cuaderno SMC v. Kahn

Ellingrvood' v. Wolfs Head Oil Refining HaY v. HaY al'' Augusta Trust v' Augusr-a' et al Garcia v. Lim Chu Sing Co ' Wallace v. Eclipse Pocahontas Coal inc' Bayla, et al., v' Silang Tralfic Co'' Benito v. SE C Stokes v. ContinentaL Trust Thom v. Baltimore Trust Ross Tra:rsPort v' Crothers Meritt ChaPman v' New York Trust Jordan Co. v. Allen Alladin Hotel v' Bloom FOR SHARES CIIT{I}TER:KII . CONSIDEITATION Inc' Triplex Shoe Co' v' Rice & Hatchins' McCartY v. Laregdeau Rode v. Dock-hoP Co ' Velasco v. Poizat LingaYen Gulf v' Balt-azat De Silva v. Aboitiz National Exchange v' IB Dexter Lumanlan v. Cura Fua Cun v. Summers BaJtazar v. LingaYen Gulf Navav. Peers CHAIvI'ER Xm

- DnTTDENDS pURCHASE BY CORPORATIONS OF SHARES

Nielson & Co. v. Lepanto Consolidated Berks Broadcasting v' Craumer Lich v. US Rubber Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co ' Dodge v. Ford Motor Co ' Burk v. Otawa Gas & Electric Co ' Mclaran v. Crescent Planning

 

, t

Marcus v. RH MacY PhiliPPine Trrst Co' v' Rivera CHAPTER XV - TRANFER OF SHARES Uson v. Diosomoto 415) Nautica Canning Corp' v' Yumul (473 SCRA Razon v. IAC (2O7 SCRA 235) 1) Rural Bank oi S,littu's v' CA (2lO SCRA 51 Sta. Maria v. HKSB Delos Santos v. AttY' Ge n Chua Guan v. Samahang Magsasaka' Inc' CHAPTER X\/I - DISSOLUTION Financing CorPoration v' Teodoro RP v. BisaYa Land TransPo' (174 S 377) Gonzales'u. S,tgut Regulatory Adm' v' CA (443 SCRA 580) Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines' Inc' National Abaca v. Pore China Banking v' Michelin & Cte RP v. Marsman Dev' Co ' Tan Tiong Bio v. CIR CHAPTER )KVII - CORPORATE COMBINATIONS ReYesv. Blouse ReYesv. Edward u. Nellv. Pacific Farms

Marshall Wells v. Elser Columbia Pictures v' CA (261 SCRA 144) General Garments v' Dir' Of Patents Le Chemise Lacoste v' Fernandez Mentholatum v. Mangiliman v. Integrated Silicon Agilent iechnotogies singapore (pte) Ltd. 593) Technolog enilippitr". corporation (427 SCRA Merryl Lynch FJiures v' CA (21 1 SCRA 824) Top Weld' Manufacturing, Inc' v' ECED Antam v. CA

UPLAW4 / corPo-sched-cases5