The British Counter Jihad

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad
A Series of Five Short Essays Outlining The Reality Of Islam and Islamic Sharia Law and the Very Serious Threat Islam Poses To Great Britain and the British People.
Warning: Contains Graphic Evidence Detailing the Mental and Physical Abuse of Women and Children and the Murders of Jews, Christians, Hindus and Buddhists. Please Do Not View When Minors Are Present. This Is The Brutal Truth About Islam. A Truth That Is Being Deliberately Concealed From The British People. It Is A Truth That MUST Be Told.

By Reconquista

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad
Prelude: The British Intifada: How Britain Will Become Europe's Israel Background If I were to say to you that in just ten short years, Great Britain will be in exactly the same situation IF NOT WORSE, than the state of Israel, how would you react? Would you dismiss me as being paranoid? Perhaps you'd say that although there are several parallels, such a perilous state of existence is unique because of Israel's geographical location and the fact that it is of course, a Jewish and not a Christian state. Or maybe you'd ask the barman for "a glass of what Reconquista has been drinking". In a recent debate, a protagonist asserted that THE problem Great Britain faces isn't Islamic jihad but the Marxists, the socialists, the liberals, the lib/lab/con elites, the cowards, betrayers and traitors who have sold out their own people by imposing the horrors of a multicultural society upon the people of Great Britain. I disagreed and was told "you need to see the bigger picture". So the contention here is that "the big picture" is to state that the problem is within Britain itself and that a BNP government (something I am longing for) will solve the problem by putting an end to the lunatic, suicidal policies of cultural Marxism by ending mass immigration and by imposing a nationalist system of governance. Au contraire. Although a BNP government will be a desperately needed dramatic improvement on the shambles of successive corrupt and incompetent lib/lab/con administrations who have disgraced the Houses of Parliament, this isn't quite "the big picture". In fact, it is dangerously myopic as I will now explain. Small Is Beautiful The first point to make concerns geography. Take a look at a map of the Middle East. Israel, although a modern, efficient nation, is but

a tiny part of it, about one-sixth. It is surrounded by nations who wish to see nothing less than the total destruction of Israel. Now take a look at the map of Europe and look at Great Britain. It's well, it's not very big is it? And although we are an Island people who have been saved on more than one occasion by the seas, the distances between the white cliffs of Dover and France - about 35 miles - well, the sea will not be much of a protection in future conflicts. So let's assume the dream happens and the BNP are given the mandate by the British people. Within 24 hours, the BNP would pull us out of the European Union, an Islam promoting union Bat Y'eor famously described as "Eurabia". Small but beautiful Britain, this green and pleasant land, would then have a collection of hostile EU nations right on its doorstep. The Coming British Intifada We are told that there are about 1.5 million Muslims in Great Britain. This figure is contested as we all know, with some putting the figure at double that. These are Muslims whose allegiance is not to Great Britain and the British way of life but to Islam and the Islamic way of life. To quote the high-profile Muslim mouth-piece and fanatical jihadist Anjem Choudhary: "We are not British Muslims we are British-born Muslims." And then there is the treason of a Muslim peer of the realm, Lord Ahmed, who declared his successful attempt to prevent the visit of Dutch MP Geert Willders to Parliament for a viewing of Wilders' film "Fitna" as "a victory for the Muslim community". To gain victory, Ahmed, Lord of of jihad, threatened "to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims" if his demands were not accepted. Now let us imagine the state Great Britain could well be in just ten years from now. The demographic weapon is one of the most -if not THE most - effective strategies deployed by Muslims to conquer a land in "Dar al Harb", just ask the Kosovo Serbs. It is not unreasonable to estimate that the Muslim community in Britain will number around 8-10 million. If we look at Israel, in 1948 the number of "Palestinian" refugees officially recognised by UNRWA - refugees cunningly created by the Arabs themselves - was around 500,000. They now number over 4 million. And as the years have passed and the number has risen,

there have been scores of suicide bombings and two violent uprisings - intifadas - along with 5 jihads, the 2 most recent being waged by terrorist organisations Hizballah in Lebanon 2006 and by HAMAS in Gaza in 2008-9. Perhaps the strongest Muslim communities in Great Britain at the moment are in Bradford and Birmingham. What if these communities continue to grow - and they will - and, following the pattern of jihadists in "Palestine", Kosovo, India, The Lebanon, Thailand, Iran - and many more - they start to demand autonomy? To demand their own "Islamic State" that exists separately from Great Britain on British soil? I remember watching a television programme presented by one of the parasites of the race industry, Darcus Howe, where Pakistani Muslims in Birmingham told him in no uncertain terms: "In twenty years time this place will be more like Islamabad than Birmingham. It will all be ours." (I couldn't find this programme searching the web but if anyone reading this can help me find it I would be most grateful.) Here's something that may surprise you: Think back 10 years. Can you remember Islam being such a main topic of news as it is today or that mosques and Muslims would be as common a sight as they are right now? Because I for one had absolutely no idea whatsoever about Islam back then, Islam simply wasn't even on my radar. Had I been asked about Sharia Law, I'd have said "Isn't she an American country and western singer?" A decade ago Islam was exactly what I wished it was today: A nonentity for me. So do you honestly think it is a figment of my imagination to imagine violent intifadas on the streets of Birmingham or Bradford that mirror the scenes we have witnessed so often in the West Bank and the Gaza strip? And remember, there has never been a state called "Palestine", there are no such people as "Palestinians", this is all Islamic propaganda aimed at destroying Israel. It is just a single part of the current third global Islamic jihad that is being waged by Muslims to turn the lands of "Dar al Harb" into "Dar al Islam". Should this happen in Britain - and I have to state quite clearly that as someone who has studied the history of Islamic jihad I think it WILL happen - then this will trigger a domino effect which again will mirror events in the Middle East.

Love Thy Neighbour As one of the first actions by a BNP government will be to pull Britain out of the EU dictatorship, this will immediately generate a wave of criticism and anti-British feeling from the governments of the various nations who remain tied to the EU and who pursue the totalitarian single-Europe goal with zeal. Our closest neighbours in the EU are also being enriched by vast numbers of Muslims. Tiny Netherlands, where Dutch MP Geert Wilders is about to be prosecuted for hate crimes because he dared to make a film exposing the uncomfortable truth about Islam, has a growing and restless Moroccan community. The city of Rotterdam now has Holland's first Muslim mayor and the Dutch socialist government appeases the Muslim community at every turn, pressured by both the belligerent Muslim community and greedy global capitalist Dutch corporations who place profits above the preservation of The Netherlands and the Dutch way of life. Little Belgium is similar to Holland. The Molenbeek village in Brussels is now more like a Moroccan village than a Belgian one. And just like their Dutch counterparts, the Belgian government bends over backwards to appease their Muslims, and recently banned a SIOE (Stop the Islamification of Europe) demonstration scheduled for 9/11. Things don't improve when we look at France. If anything, things get even worse. The French are also experiencing the joys and benefits of mass Muslim immigration, none more so than in their capital city Paris. In "Les Banlieues", poor suburbs that have been taken over by Algerian Muslims, outsiders walk through the area at their peril. Police are routinely driven out by gangs of Muslim youths with one Police chief declaring that his officers "are now fighting the French intifada." Each summer, the main cities of France burn as enraged Muslim youths go on the rampage torching cars and engaging in fierce street battles with the French Police. The French President Sarkozy, elected on the promise to tackle these issues has done absolutely nothing other than appease. A staunch Europhile, he has even declared that Arabic should be the future first language of France. Can you see where I'm going with this? Let me ask you:

What do you think the EU and our closest neighbours will do should there be an intifada for a separate Islamic state in Great Britain? Do you think these nations - who could well be facing a similar situation themselves - will be of any support to us or do you think that they may support our enemy in the same way that they support terrorist organisations such as HAMAS and Hizballah? Now think about this: Turkey is busily agitating for full membership of the European Union. If - make that when - this nightmare happens, Europe will be flooded with Turkish Muslims who will all play their part in turning the infidel lands of Europe into "Dar al Harb". Here's another portion of food for thought: This is just a snapshot of our closest neighbours, Belgium, The Netherlands and France. I haven't mentioned the dire situations that exist in Norway and Sweden nor the equally dire situations in Germany and Austria. Even the favourite summer holiday destination of the Brits, sunny Spain, now has serious problems with Muslim immigrants. And for desert: France not only has a strong army and navy. It possesses nuclear weaponry. Should France become part of Dar al Islam... A United Front The scenario we are discussing here concerns a demand by a majority Muslim community in a British city, for example Birmingham, to establish their own Islamic state. This leads to wide-spread rioting, vicious street battles with the Police, suicide bombing attacks, an armed struggle which a future BNP government may seek to quell by deploying the army. A once unthinkable situation becomes reality as The West Bank comes to Birmingham. In a previous essay, Shilling for Jiahd Part Two, I outlined how the UN has now been taken over by Islamic nations and is now playing an active part in advancing the global jihad. Now it maybe that a BNP government will also pull Britain out of the UN. I for one hope so. But maybe they won't because of our veto. But I do know this: In it or out of it, the UN will react to anything a British government does to take action against Islamic jihadists on British territory demanding an Islamic state in exactly the same way it reacts to Israel's actions to defend its citizens and preserve its nation.

Resolution after resolution will be passed against us. Could this mean sanctions? Could this mean that the Islamic bloc will threaten us with the oil weapon? Will the US, who even under a Republican administration saw Condi Rice compare the sham cause of the "Palestinians" with the struggle of the civil rights movement back in the 1960's, be our ally or the ally of our enemies under a Democratic - should that be Dhimmicratic? - administration led by an Islam sympathising President Barrack HUSSEIN Obama? A "black" President who will probably be voted in for a second term by the large black and Hispanic communities. Will we be forced by the UN and the world's super-powers - Russia, China and the US - to accept a "two state" solution and to resist no matter what from responding "disproportionately" under threat of attack as happened to Serbia? Will the power of our veto be enough to defend us against the Islamic bloc and its allies as they condemn us in the same way they condemn Israel? I wouldn't bet on it. One thing is for certain. Just as Israel and Serbia have discovered, we British won't find any friends in the reptile swamp of the United Nations. It is nothing more than a vehicle for Islamic despots and dictators to impose Islam on the world, a task the UN is willingly aiding. Made In Britain Finally, there is one more aspect to this nightmare scenario which Israel doesn't have to contend with but we most certainly will. I began this essay by stating the position held by a protagonist that THE problem Britain faces is within. Namely, from the Marxist/socialist/liberal elites who are all responsible for the dire straits that Great Britain is in today. These are the self-hating, British-hating, multicultural-worshipping, pro-EU and pro-global capitalist internationalists who have brought the peoples of the third-world along with their retarded ideologies and cultures to the towns and cities of Britain. There is no more retarded an ideology than Islam. Wherever Islam takes root, abuse, violence and death follow. It is a supremacist, intolerant and brutal ideology that seeks to dominate and whose believers have as their ultimate goal the will to establish Islam as the single global religion. Indeed, Allah through his so-called Prophet, Mohammed, commanded it. Islam has now taken root in Britain thanks to the Marxist/socialist/liberal fools who have placed their loyalty to their

irrational ideologies above all else and in doing so, have now placed the British people in grave danger. Just as Israel has its suicidal liberals - jewicidal liberals as they are sometimes referred to - Britain also has a similar problem. Although it can be said that liberals are well-meaning but misguided fantasists who are pursuing a naive aim of equality that is out-of step with the reality of human nature, there are others in our midst who are not so well-meaning. Unlike Israel, we have committed Marxists whose goal is to totally destroy our nation and reduce it to a state of anarchy. These are the traitors who will stand with the enemy and fight with the jihadists. So not only will we be faced with naive liberals who will, just as they do with the situation in Israel, call for Britain to make peace and accept a "two state solution", we will be faced with the treachery of our own people who will collaborate with Islamic jihadists and who share the same fanatical desire to destroy Britain. So not only do we face the prospect of a war on our own land to save it from falling into the hands of a fanatical Islamic enemy, we will be faced with fighting our own people. This is the big picture of Islamic jihad, and you can now understand why I believe that Islam is THE problem. We are truly on the cusp of an horrific nightmare, and if the history of Islamic jihad teaches us anything it is that it isn't a question of IF this nightmare will happen but WHEN. What is the famous saying regarding the lessons of history? I think it is something like: "Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it." We are at this moment in time, failing to learn the lessons history teaches us about how Islamic jihad is waged and how it succeeds in conquering the lands of "Dar al Harb" so they become "Dar al Islam". What is happening to Israel today will for sure happen to Britain in the not too distant future. Conclusion It is clear that if Islam continues to flourish in Great Britain then there will be a demand from a majority Muslim community in a city such as Birmingham, for a separate Islamic state. The consequences of this will not be restricted to Great Britain and it will not be an issue that can solely be dealt with by electing a

much needed BNP government. The "Big Picture" to be fully aware of is that we not only face an Islamic enemy within our borders who will be aided and abetted by British collaborators both well-meaning and malicious. We will also be confronted with Islam-appeasing EU nations who will support our enemy and in a worst-case scenario, use military force against us. This would be a serious threat should France fall into Dar al Islam. The oil-rich Arab-Islamic nations of the world will also play a very active part during the British Intifada, and use of the oil weapon by the Arab nations, especially Saudi Arabia who is pouring millions of dollars worth of petro-dollars into spreading Islam around the world, is just one way they will join the battle. The influence and dominance the Islamic bloc wields in the viper's nest that is the UN will lead to scores of resolutions against Britain which may include sanctions or even a demand for a UN peace-keeping force to be deployed. Will the US, our NATO ally come to our aid or will they seek a peaceful "2 state solution" as they do in "Palestine" or will they stay out of it altogether? All of these will be helping to create an Islamic state on British soil and when one Islamic state is established in Britain, there will be demands for another. First it could be Birmingham, next Bradford then Oldham. This is how Islamic jihad is prosecuted, and this is why I assert that THE problem we are facing here and now is Islam. And my God we had better wake up and realise it very, very quickly or we are doomed to a nightmare future of compliant, subservient dhimmitude. The question is "how do we prevent this nightmare from happening?" and it is a question I will try to offer some answers to in coming essays here on the Green Arrow blog.

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad
1. The Deadly WMD That Will Defeat Islamic Jihad Background Britain is now fighting a war unlike any other it has been engaged in during its long and illustrious history. Gone forever are the days where armies and navies faced other as clearly identifiable combatants engaged in battle on battlefields devoid of civilians. These are the days of asymmetric warfare, where the battlefields are the information super-highways and the streets of British cities teeming with combatants who walk as civilians among us and who conceal their seething hatred of us behind a smile before selfdetonating on buses and trains. These are also the days of stealth warfare where deception is used as an anaesthetic to fool people into an illusory peaceful state, a state that blinds them to the ongoing Islamisation of their own land. Asymmetric warfare is the modern-day warfare waged by fanatical, deceitful and corrupt enemies who flood us with an avalanche of propaganda to brainwash an ignorant populace into accepting an ideology whose followers are hell-bent on conquering Britain and subjugating the British people. Islam via Islamic jihad continues to flourish in Britain. Each passing month sees another cowardly concession to accommodate Islamic practices. From the mega-mosque in London that will dominate the capital's skyline to special "halal" dietary needs of Muslim prisoners in British jails, the growing and ever-belligerent Islamic community makes one thing clear: Do as we say or else. Aided and abetted by the multicultural power-hungry parasites who depend on the Muslim-bloc vote and by their lick-spittle lackeys in the politicised mass media who all treacherously promote Islam as "The Religion of Peace", the British people are slowly but surely sleepwalking towards a nightmare future of subservient dhimmitude under Islamic rule. As the Muslim communities continue to grow, demographics, the most effective weapon of Islamic jihad, will see Muslims continue to make more and more demands and eventually, Islam will become the dominant religion in once Christian Great Britain. Unless we start to fightback, Al-Britannia is simply a question of when, not if.

So what can we British Nationalists do to try to counter the Islamic jihad that is now being prosecuted with zeal in our once proud nation? Is resistance futile or is there hope for us to defeat this supremacist, intolerant and brutal ideology that spreads via the sword? Will we have to resort to violence and armed struggle to defend the realm or do other peaceful but highly-effective options exist? These are the issues I am going to focus on in this and forthcoming essays. Sleepwalking To Dhimmitude Although Islamic jihad is nothing new - it has existed since the Islamic Prophet Mohammed's exodus to Medina in 622 - very, very few people in Britain are aware of what jihad really is or indeed of the history of jihad. Most will believe that Islam is a "Religion of Peace", a religion like any other and will believe that jihad is either a term to describe those Muslims who are extremists and who misunderstand the "peaceful message" of Islam, or alternatively, think jihad is a term used to describe violent terrorists who prosecute a "holy war". Then we have naive others whose slavish devotion to the Multicultural ideology enslaves them in ignorance. To avoid being decried as the dreaded "racist" their priority is to exercise tolerance so the truth is sacrificed as they assert: "It's about violent psychopaths who twist and distort the verses of the Qu'ran to justify their hatred. All religions have such cranks." Of course, there are others amongst us who know the truth but who will still adamantly proclaim these myths as truths for their own greed and selfish gain. Sadly, there are also those who won't have the faintest idea or even the slightest interest. Ask a Muslim as to what jihad is and they will tell you with straightfaced piety: "It is a duty for all Muslims to pursue jihad because it is about an inner-struggle to find peace with Allah." Whilst this is partially true, and regarded as the "higher jihad" by some Islamic scholars, jihad is much more than a "personal struggle". The rest of the meaning of jihad will be withheld from you, a practice referred to as "kitman" - concealing the whole truth about Islamic doctrines from the unbelievers.

There are even British Nationalists who do not fully understand the nature of jihad, again believing that jihad is all about violence and warfare. Jihad is much much more than violent warfare and it is certainly not limited to Islamic terrorists or that ever-so common misnomer the press always use, "Islamic extremists". All of these misguided views stem from a simple basic fact: There is a widespread misunderstanding of Islam in Great Britain. (I could also say "the western world" but this is about the British counter-jihad.) This is one very important piece of good news for British Nationalists fighting to halt Islamic jihad. Why? Because the Achilles heel of Islam and the biggest WMD we can deploy against the Islamic jihad that is being waged against us, is the truth about what Islam actually is and always has been since 622. Islam's Dirty Little Secret I've just given you one of the very best facts you can use to counter the claim that Islam is a "Religion of Peace". Did you get it? Look at the year that ends the final paragraph in the proceeding section, 622. It is a very significant year because that is the first year of the Islamic calendar. Many will believe that this is the year when the Islamic Prophet Mohammed was born, others the year he founded Islam, others the year of Mohammed's death. None of these are true. 622 is the year when Islam changed forever. It is the year Mohammed and his followers fled the city of Mecca and headed for the safety of Medina. This flight is called "The Hirja" and it is during this flight that Allah revealed the conditions of jihad, or the "struggle" against unbelievers to establish Islam as the dominant religion in the world. Every action that is taken to advance Islam is an act of jihad. This means teaching Islam in our schools, the sale of halal meat, the building of mosques, Muslim MPs, foot-baths in public places - you get the idea - as well as acts of terrorism, all of these are part of the Islamic jihad. Prior to 622, Islam had been a peaceful religion, a combination of Judaism, Christianity and various Arab religions, the new religion of Mohammed that was rejected in Mecca. Angered and embittered by this humiliation, Allah conveniently rides to Mohammed's rescue and instructs Mohammed to wage war on those who refuse to submit to the "truth" and this is regarded as so significant that 622 is the first year of Islam. Not 610 when the Angel Gabriel first visited

Mohammed in a cave and spawned the first, peaceful version of Islam, but 622. Why would anyone believe then that Islam is peaceful? Because clearly, in selecting 622 as the first year of Islam, a statement about which stage of Islam is regarded as the most important has been made. Indeed, under Islamic jurisprudence, the verses Mohammed received in Medina abrogate many of the more peaceful verses he received during his time in Mecca, abrogation referred to as "naskh" in Islam. Receiving Allah's instructions for jihad in 622 is not the only significant event to emerge from the Hirja that can help us counter Islamic jihadists and their apologists. Our cause can be helped by a very unlikely source indeed. The Islamic Prophet Mohammed himself. Let's Twist Again I have engaged in God knows how many debates about Islam, both in the real-world and in the virtual world. I have been banned from God-knows how many sites and forums, been smeared with the usual - and tiresome - brickbats: "Islamophobe", "Bigot" and of course the quite ridiculous "Racist" whenever I have dared to mention that Islam is not a "Religion of Peace". Racist, this catch-all hate-crime that is used to silence anyone who challenges the cosy "we're all equal" world-view of the Multiculturalists is particularly idiotic in this instance because Islam is not a race and neither are Muslims. Not that facts will deter the self-righteous from their inquisitions as we British Nationalists know all too well. But what really exasperates me more than these asinine and lame ad-hominem attacks is the ignorance most people display about the Islamic religion. In every debate I have been part of, including with British Nationalists, most of those who defend Islam do not have the slightest clue about it. More often than not, they will trot-out the same criticisms and sound-bites they have collected over the years when discussing - make that criticising - the religions of Christianity and Judaism. I will bet you a pound to a penny that you have heard this soundbite that is spewed out with mind-numbing predictability: "All religions have these cranks and bigots who take the verses of their holy books and twist and distort them for their own ends.

Islam is no different, there are evil Muslims who mis-interpret the teachings of the Qu'ran to excuse their hatred just as Christians and Jews mis-interpret the teachings of the Bible." Good Lord I absolutely CRINGE when I hear this nonsense! Aside from the fact that there doesn't seem to be hordes of holy warriors waging war against unbelievers from the Christian or Jewish faiths, this tired old sound-bite has a very serious flaw: The Qu'ran, even though it is regarded as the absolute word of Allah that cannot be changed, isn't the sole guide to how a Muslim should practice his or her faith. For one, about 20% of it is totally unfathomable. For two, it is written in rhyming prose in classical Arabic and is therefore difficult to understand for most Muslims, even Arabic ones. For a full, clearer understanding of how Allah's will is to be INTERPRETED, Muslims also have to refer to another crucial book: The Sunnah. Why is the Sunnah critical to Islam? Because it details how Mohammed personally acted out the will of Allah and it contains authoritative eye-witness accounts of how Mohammed lived his life. In other words, it explains how the Islamic Prophet Mohammed practised his faith. And believe me, Mohammed was a man who practised what he preached with great relish. The importance of this cannot be stressed enough and it is this importance that will aid us in the British counter-jihad. Leading By Example The esteem Muslims have for their Prophet should not be underestimated. He is regarded as "al insan al kamil uswa hasana" - the ideal man, the perfect example for all time. The shahada is the declaration of faith and is recited daily by Muslims and is one of the 5 pillars of Islam: "La ilaha illa Allah, Mohammed rasulu Allah." - There is one God and Mohammed is his messenger." This demonstrates clearly that if Mohammed is the perfect example and the messenger of God, then the way Mohammed lived his life is the example ALL Muslims must follow. Plain simple reasoning that cannot be refuted. It's the same for Christians who follow the example of their Messiah Jesus Christ, agreed?

So as well as reciting the somewhat confusing rhyming verses of the Qu'ran, Muslims consult the Sunnah for guidance on how to practice their faith by following the real-life example of their Prophet Mohammed. Yet this crucial fact about the Islamic religion is rarely, if ever, mentioned by politicians, the media, and of course, Muslim leaders whenever they are responding to accusations that Islam isn't peaceful. They will always say something along the lines of "The Qu'ran doesn't sanction..." or "The Qu'ran is being quoted out of context..." and other such apologetic nonsense. Perhaps the very best example of this came recently from the Lord of Jihad himself, Lord Ahmed. This is a Muslim peer of the House of Lords who as part of his campaign to prevent Geert Wilders from attending the Lords to debate the film "Fitna" stated: "I think relating A RELIGION to SOME of the criminalities is quite NONSENSE by saying this is freedom of speech. This is a deliberate attempt to PROVOKE A REACTION for people who are just looking for cheap publicity." That is as classic a piece of Al Taqiyya as you will ever hear, and he is following the example of his Prophet! Watch the following video and hear it from the jihadist's mouth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4dxE8hhNuA But we're not relating A RELIGION to SOME of the criminalities. We are relating Islam to various acts committed by Islamic jihadists who are citing the Qu'ran and the example of the Prophet as their guiding forces. Here's just a small selection of how Mohammed practised his faith: Personally beheaded men after defeating the Jewish Banu Qurayzah tribe. Enslaved the women and children of this tribe including marrying one of the women immediately after he had beheaded her husband. Married a six year old girl and consummated the marriage when she was 9. Ordered the stoning of adulterers. Burned atheists.

All documented in the Sunnah and you can find out more about the shining beacon of Islamic morality in this excellent Islam 101 over on JihadWatch: <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam101/">Excellent Islam 101</a> All of this is so important because it is proof that the Islamic Prophet Mohammed received these divine instructions THAT HE PERSONALLY ACTED OUT from 622 onwards. This means that were Mohammed alive today, he would be at the head of Al Qaeda. In other words, when jihadists behead people or slaughter infidels, they are simply following the example of their prophet. This gives those who continually apologise for Islam and claim that it is a "Religion of Peace" a very difficult problem. Should anyone dare to question the claim that is. Questioning what the Multicultural Marxist-liberal Gestapo tell you is true can seriously threaten your liberty as Geert Wilders has discovered. That Wilders continues to question speaks volumes for the man. Chasing Phantoms To support the claim that Islam is "A Religion of Peace" apologists will claim that there exists two versions of Muslims: 1. That Muslims who call for and carry out violence against infidels are "extremists". 2. That not all Muslims wage jihad and that just like other religions, there are "moderate" Muslims. Both of these statements are false. Let's look at the first claim, that Muslims who wage Jihad against infidels are "extremists". It is clear that the Islamic Prophet Mohammed waged violent jihad, including personally committing acts of violence as well as murder, against the infidel. Does this mean Mohammed was an "extremist"? Well he is by the standards of other religions but in the context of Islam, he isn't an extremist but the perfect example for all time. His is the example all Muslims seek to emulate. Therefore those who follow the perfect example of Mohammed PBUH! - and who commit acts of terror and violence against infidels

are certainly not extremists but DEVOUT Muslims who are practising the true faith of Islam. just as their prophet did. The second claim, that there exists a group who are "moderate" Muslims is simply an insult to the intelligence. I can easily prove this by asking you a question: If I said to you: I believe that a man who raped a little girl; beheaded human beings; burned out the eyes and amputated the limbs of thieves; stoned adulterers to death; who referred to Jews and Christians as "the descendants of apes and pigs", who forced his adopted son to divorce his beautiful wife so he could then have sex with her; who forced a slave to marry him immediately after she had witnessed him murder her husband; who stated that it is a believer's duty to fight to establish their religion as the sole religion of the world is a prophet, a messenger sent by God and that I assert this in prayer each and everyday of my life then: Would you refer to me as a "moderate" just because I hadn't committed any acts of violence against unbelievers? Even if I stated that I don't agree with the verses of my holy book that call for war against unbelievers, it would still be a stretch to label me as a "moderate" if I believe in a prophet who spread his faith by the sword wouldn't it? Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan recently responded to those who use the term "moderate Islam": "These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is what it is and that's it." Who shall we believe dear reader? Western politicians like Brown, Smith, Cameron and Milliband who tell us what Islam is or an Islamic leader of an Islamic country who actually practices the Islamic faith himself? Conclusion There are a number of issues arising from this first essay - I will be writing further essays discussing the British counter-jihad - that are of concern to British Nationalists. 1. That there is a widespread ignorance as to what the harsh and painful truth really is regarding the Islamic religion.

2. Ignorance is - just as it always has in lands conquered by Islam - helping jihadists to further their goal to establish Islam,as the dominant religion in Britain. 3. That the Achilles heel of Islam is the truth about Islam and its prophet Mohammed and that Muslims are fully aware of this weakness. 4. That this truth needs to be discovered by as many of our people as possible to help halt the advance of Islam in Britain. A large part of Islamic jihad involves the use of propaganda, the information war. Islamic jihadists are making a huge effort on the internet, both to dis-inform and confuse the kuffars, and to recruit new mujahideen (fighters of jihad) to the global Islamic jihad. We British Nationalists need to be heavily engaged in this information war and it is something all of us can do, indeed, as we have accepted the responsibility to support the BNP and defend the realm then it is our duty to get the truth to our people. Exposing the truth is a peaceful yet highly-effective act of resistance and if enough of us get the truth out then hopefully the need for armed resistance will recede. In the next essay I will elaborate on strategies we can deploy to get the truth out and I'll also go into detail about what responses you can expect and how to counter them. I mentioned above just how important the Sunnah is and to end this first essay here is an entry from the Sunnah of Sahih Bukhari, (the sahih denotes that it regarded as authoritative in Islam) and are the words of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed himself: <a href="http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resour ces/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html">Sahih Bukhari Volume 4 Book 52 Number 220</a> "I have been made victorious through terror." Terror is used by Muslims to intimidate us so we fear them. That's how Mohammed used it and it's time to call time on Islam and its game of terror. We have plenty of ammunition we can use as you will see in the next essay but the truth is our most powerful weapon and we should use it wisely and to devastating effect.

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad

"I'm experiencing an inner spiritual struggle to find Allah." 2. Sound The Clarion Call To Awaken Britannia Background In my previous essay, I explained how Islamic jihad is being prosecuted in Great Britain and how it is advancing the cause of Islam with the end goal being that Great Britain is conquered and transformed into an Islamic state. Recall that this is the duty of every Muslim in the UK; to turn our nation, a nation Muslims regard as part of "Dar al Harb" - the house of war - into "Dar al Islam" the house of Islam. The Islamic prophet Mohammed - "al insan al kamil uswa hasana" - has personally set the example himself. One of the issues that British nationalists need to address - and we need to address it with urgency - concerns how mired in ignorance our own people are as to the uncomfortable and harsh reality about what the Islamic religion actually is. This ignorance is as deadly as any of the weapons Islamic jihadists deploy against us and it is a weapon they cunningly exploit to the maximum. Muslims are very well aware that infidels throughout the west are largely unaware of the serious threat Islam poses to them. In the case of Britain - and of course most western nations but let's confine this to Britain - Muslims also know that one of our noteworthy virtues is also one of our main weaknesses: our tolerance of other people and of other cultures. They are also aware that multiculturalism and political correctness those evil twin spawns of Marxism - have brainwashed our people into hating their own cultures and traditions and to accepting that all people are equal. Jihadists also know that if anyone dares to speak out against Islam, they can be silenced by branding them as "haters", "Islamophobes" and of course "racists".

Fear of these Orwellian thought-control hate-crimes has placed a gag on our people and blinded them to an enemy that is determined to conquer them and subjugate them. Brainwashed and blinded, they will also confront their own people who have the courage to expose Islam for the violent, oppressive and intolerant faith it truly is by apologising for and defending the Islamic religion and in so doing, they unwittingly advance the Islamic jihad. They are not just brainwashed by PC. Muslims know these liberalminded people will also fall for all of the lies and deceptions that portray Islam as "a religion of peace" and it is crucial that British nationalists are fully informed about all of these deceptions and falsities that will be trotted out to shelter Islam from the spotlight of truth and continue to trap people in a dense fog of ignorance so that the intolerant is tolerated. Deception is a crucial weapon of Islamic jihad and the gullible who are taken in by it are akin to lemmings marching towards the abyss, blissfully unaware of the terrible fate that awaits them. The grave danger is that they will take the rest of us with them. We must not let that happen and that means sounding the clarion call to awaken our people to the reality of Islam and the escalating threat of Islamic jihad. It is crucial to the British counter-jihad that we possess an informed awareness as to what we can expect from our opponents whenever we expose Islam for what it truly is. Where's The Harm? One of the first responses you will be confronted with is: "Everyone has a right to practice their faith and so do Muslims. Most Muslims are peaceful, I know Muslims and they're fine. All religions are the same, they've all got their cranks and nutters and they don't represent the true meaning of religion anyway." It's a great answer isn't it? Seems a perfectly logical and fair statement to make about all religions. All religions that is apart from Islam and here's why: For a start everyone doesn't have the right to practice their faith. If you believe that your faith is superior to others and that those who do not accept your religion can be killed or subjugated then you most certainly do not have the right to practice that faith. Not in a society that regards itself as enlightened and civilised that is.

Most Muslims are peaceful. Is this true? If by peaceful you mean that they don't commit acts of terror then maybe this is correct. But Islamic jihadists have committed more than 12800 terror attacks since 9/11 and if most Muslims are peaceful, then where are the Muslims who are calling for those committing these atrocities to cease? These are the same peaceful Muslims who march in their millions demanding the death of Danish cartoonists, British authors and a Dutch politician but who are conspicuous by their absence when it comes to marching for peace after Islamic jihadists have slaughtered scores of infidels in yet another bombing. But what about those Muslims who demand for Sharia law to be accommodated; mega-mosques to be built; Islam to be taught in all schools; Halal food to be sold in shops and served in schools, prisons and public buildings; who demand ramadan customs be followed by all employees in public offices and that other Islamic traditions such as Eid be openly celebrated whilst calling the celebrations of other religious feasts "offensive". Are these peaceful tolerant Muslims? Is Ahmed Lord of Jihad a shining example of a respected moderate Muslim even though he demanded the suppression of free speech and threatened to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims - who would all be moderate and peaceful no doubt - should his demand be ignored? And just where, exactly, are the cranks and nutters from other faiths who are committing thousands of terrorist attacks in the name of their religion or executing non-believers on videos viewed by believers all over the world on the Internet? Executions complete with readings from the Qu'ran and to the cry of "Allahu akhbar". Are other religious people committing such horrific murders in the name of their faith? The Perfect Extremist What will follow from the above as sure as eggs are eggs is the accusation that the "extremists" who are committing these atrocities whilst reciting verses from the Qu'ran are cherry-picking verses which they are then taking out of context. I'm betting you're now nodding your head as you've heard this, right? This is much easier to counter for two reasons: The Qu'ran is not the sole guide as to how Muslims practice their faith, for that, they have to turn to the Sunnah to refer to the perfect example of all time - the Islamic prophet Mohammed and this gives us the second reason: That of the use of the word "extremist".

It is so important that the example of Mohammed is the main focus of any debate involving Islam. Why? Because he is the fulcrum of Islam. Mohammed IS Islam. When you examine the actions of Muslims and Islamic jihadists, always know that they are not solely following the Qu'ran but the example set by Mohammed as detailed in the Sunnah. This is a huge problem for apologists and I have to say that I have yet to be defeated in debate because of this simple fact. When jihadists behead infidels they are following the example of their prophet who personally beheaded non-believers. When they murder infidels in terrorist attacks they are following the example of their prophet who personally murdered infidels. When they stone adulterers to death they are following the example of their prophet who ordered adulterers to be stoned to death. When adult Muslim males marry little girls - some as young as three but in Sharia Law the age is set at nine - they do so because their prophet married a six year old girl who he raped when she was just nine years old. Does this mean therefore that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was an extremist? Obviously it does to the infidels whose religions do not have such a violent, sex-crazed psychopath as a prophet. But to Muslims, Mohammed is no such thing. He is the perfect example for all time, the final prophet of Allah, a prophet who is the embodiment of the Islamic faith. Remember the quote in my previous essay from Turkish PM Erdogan? Now you know why he said it. Allah's Divine Law I mentioned above that Mohammed married an infant child who he sexually abused when she was just nine years of age. The marriage to little six year old Aisha and the consummation is also witnessed in the Sunnah and if this is ever questioned, you can also add the fact that with Islam comes Sharia law, the Islamic legal system. In Sharia law, grown men are allowed to marry girls of nine years of age. This again reflects in Islamic jurisprudence the example personally set by Mohammed with Aisha. It is one of the most damning indictments of Mohammed, and by God there are many, the fact that he sexually abused a little girl and it also puts Islam directly in conflict with British law because marrying children is illegal as we regard sex with children under sixteen as paedophilia, one of the most repulsive of crimes.

Yet apologists and Muslims will defend this heinous act. They will state that in the seventh century, such marriages between grown men and children were common-place in Arabic tribes and that Mohammed was simply following what was the custom of his time. Esteemed scholar and director of JihadWatch.Org Robert Spencer has also cited this in mitigation of Mohammed. Although this is true I for one am simply not buying it and for a very simple but vitally important reason. If a man is regarded as a messenger of God, entrusted to deliver the will of God to God's own people, then are we to believe that God's will involves grown men enjoying sex with children? Because that is what Mohammed claimed with Aisha, that "Allah delivered her to me in a dream" - do you fully comprehend what this lust-crazed "messenger of God" is saying here? Through medical science, we know that young children are not sufficiently physically and mentally developed to deal with sex and sexual acts. We know that if little girls are exposed to sex then their growing bodies can be damaged irreparably. Are we to seriously accept that Muslims who cite Allah as "the one God" believe that Allah doesn't know this so sex with children has the blessing of the all-knowing, all-seeing creator? But the apology doesn't wash for another reason: That Islamic Sharia TODAY still permits grown men to marry little girls. So stating that it was something that happened back in the seventh century is ia non sequitur because it is STILL happening in Islamic countries - and non-Islamic countries where Muslims reside - all blessed by Sharia and fully in accordance with the example set by the Islamic prophet himself. It is this very example of a prophet who abused a child that inspired the abhorrent fatwa issued by the Ayotallah Khomeini permitting grown men to pleasure themselves on tiny babies. Advising not to penetrate, this despicable act is known as "thighing" and you can read the fatwa for yourself here: <a href="http://www.homa.org/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=104&Itemid=58">Khomeini: Fatwa On Sex With Infants</a> How on earth can ANYONE, I don't care if you are Muslim or not, tolerate these vile acts of child abuse? Millions of little girls have had to suffer at the hands of adult Muslim males because of what Mohammed did to Aisha and we are supposed to tolerate this and

remain silent because "it's their religion, they have a right to practise their faith and we shouldn't offend them." Well I refuse to accept that the God of any religion will send his messenger to commit paedophilia. This shameful issue alone should be enough to condemn Islam as an evil ideology that is totally incompatible with British moral values and British law. The bottomline is this: If society tolerates Islam then that society tolerates the abuse of children. Child abuse is enshrined in Islamic Sharia law so wherever Islam goes child abuse will follow. IT IS PART OF ISLAM. Tolerating child abuse doesn't make a society enlightened it makes it morally bankrupt and if society refuses to speak out through fear of the consequences then that society has hoisted the white flag of cowardice and it is failing to protect its most vulnerable citizens. And dressing up child abuse as the divine will of a deity to justify it is quite frankly an abomination. This highlights the importance of the choice all Britons face: We either stand for our values, our morals, our way of life or we sell them out to accommodate the way of life of a people whose morality is based wholly on the craven behaviour of a seventh century paedophile. Time To Get Personal In my experience, it is at this point that apologists realise that you are well-informed about Islam and that the example of the Islamic prophet Mohammed is a problem they cannot address whilst maintaining that Islam is a religion of peace. So the apologists will now focus on you. The tactic at work behind this is to distract attention from Islam and to stifle your quite reasonable criticisms of Islam by portraying you as either a misunderstander, ignorant, bigoted, Islamophobic and finally - go on, take a guess, I'm sure you'll get it without needing 3 attempts! The "you're a misunderstander of Islam" is a favourite tactic usually deployed by Muslims. They will say you don't understand the message of Islam because the Qu'ran is written in classical Arabic and this cannot be translated accurately into English. And they're right, the Qu'ran is written in classical Arabic. But like any language, it can and has been translated accurately into various languages, not just English. Also, the New Testament was largely

written in Aramaic, the Old Testament in Hebrew. Does this mean that those who are not native speakers of these languages cannot understand Judaism or Christianity? But here's the killer blow for this lame distraction: There are Muslims whose first language isn't Arabic - Turks, Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, Russians, Africans etc. - does this then mean that these people will not be able to understand the Qu'ran so therefore they can't ever be Muslims? The bigot and Islamophobe accusations are easily brushed off. Highlight that the accuser is now resorting to ad hominem attacks rather than responding to the serious issues being raised. It isn't bigoted to criticise and question ANY religion or for that matter any ideology. Muslims themselves criticise Judaism and Christianity and it isn't referred to as "Judophobia" or "Christophobia" and those words also don't apply to anyone who criticises these religions. Sorry, did I say "Muslims..criticise these religions?" My mistake, let's make that "Muslims...slaughter, execute and scourge Jews and Christians." That's a damn sight more accurate don't you think? I also like to mention something which I believe is a fundamental truth: If a religion is true and strong then it will be able to deal with criticism. If it is a sham it will prevent criticism through threats and violence. As my late father advised me: "Anything that has to threaten you to make you believe isn't worth believing in." That Old Chestnut The racist card will be played against you without a doubt. People who resort to this quite ridiculous smear - Islam and Muslims are not a race - are ensconced in the gutter and they simply aren't worth debating with because they are dishonest. Better to say: "You are lowering the debate into a sewer and I refuse to join you there." I've completely and utterly had my fill of resolutely continuing only to be on the receiving end of "Whatever you say mein Fuerher", raised right-arm salutes accompanied with "Sieg Heil" and being asked "where are you going to build the ovens for the Muslims?" Been there, done it worn the tee-shirt and I now simply refuse to debate with pig-ignorant retards who resort to this dishonest tactic. Trust me it isn't worth wasting your valuable time.

The Cure For Islam Hopefully you will be debating with sincere folk who have a genuine desire to question, to criticise, to argue and to debate with an intention to leave the debate with increased knowledge. My goal is not just to present an argument that reveals the reality of Islam but to arouse curiosity so that people will continue to ask questions about Islam so they increase their knowledge after the debate is finished. Genuine debaters frequently make a statement about Islam which they believe will modernise Islam and bring it from where it is now, anchored in seventh century traditions and customs, into the modern world. This "cure" for Islam will be presented something like this: "I agree that there are problems with Islam and what I believe Islam needs is to undergo a reformation, similar to the reformations that Christianity has performed so that Islam becomes a more peaceful, tolerant religion more in-tune with the peaceful messages of the Qu'ran than the violent intolerant messages." Again, this is a perfectly reasonable statement to make. Islam could indeed modernise by becoming more tolerant of other faiths and ditching the violent Medinan verses of the Qu'ran and focusing more on the peaceful Meccan messages. There are a couple of serious problems with this though and I wonder if you've spotted the first one? You know that the Qu'ran is not the sole guide to how Muslims should practice their faith, that the Sunnah is also an essential book of reference because it details how the Islamic prophet Mohammed practised his faith. For Islam to undergo a reform and focus on the more peaceful verses it would need to do two things: 1. Alter the absolute word of Allah. Muslims believe that the verses of the Qu'ran are words spoken directly by Allah. 2. Abandon the last ten years of the life of Prophet Mohammed. Given that Mohammed is "al insan al kamil" - the perfect man - to Muslims, I think the chances of this happening are not particularly promising. What is crucial to understand about Islam is that the Qu'ran and the Sunnah are sacred to Muslims. For humans to start to change these in anyway is forbidden. Innovation in Islamic Sharia - bida -

meaning altering in anyway the texts or the history of these sacred books is not common and indeed, although there are Muslims who are calling for reform, whether or not that reform would entail a rejection of the Medinan verses and the last ten years of Mohammed's life I believe is highly unlikely. With the Christian reformation, reformers wanted Christians to be more in-tune with the teachings and the example of their Messiah Jesus Christ. What needs to be considered with Islam is that if a reformation were to occur that had the same idea, that Muslims should be more in-tune with the teachings and the example of their prophet, well, can you see a small problem here? Christ's greatest commandment was: "Love one another so that all will know you are my disciples." Contrast this with Mohammed. This is a verse taken from the Qu'ran, Sira 8 (Al Anfal "War Booty") verse 39, that Mohammed also recited when he was close to death: Translated Pickthal: "And fight them until persecution[al-fitnah or disbelief and worshipping things other than Allah] is no more, and religion is all for Allah." Unfortunately, there are many more verses like this and they make a peaceful reform of Islam almost impossible. The other problem to consider is that even if a peaceful reformation occurred, would all Muslims accept it or would sects form who remain true to the original teachings of Allah and the Islamic prophet Mohammed? I have a question for you: What kind of religion includes a verse like 8:39 in its holy texts? Watch and Learn I began this essay by questioning the definition of what a "peaceful Muslim" is and I stated that Muslims who demand Sharia law in the UK are actually jihadists. This is because the duty of every Muslim is to transform "Dar al harb" into "Dar al Islam" - also stated in 8:39 of the Qu'ran as you've just seen. Whilst I was writing this essay, I came across the following video of an Islamic march on the streets of the capital of Great Britain which will provide you with a visual and audio reference that gives further

supporting evidence for the claims I have made in this essay, all from the actions and words of Muslims themselves: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=3_vR5moPjJ0">Islamic Jihadists March Through London 28/02/09</a> Please note the following: 1. Look at what the poster of the video "Soldier For Islam" has written regarding establishing Britain as part of an Islamic "Khilafa". 2. The video begins with the shahada, and I mentioned the importance of this in part one. On this march, the shahada is being shouted to intimidate watching infidels and to impose Islam on them. Note that it is followed by cries of "Takbir - Allahu Akhbar", the battle cry of Muslims. 3. There is an abundance of Islamic flags. Not British flags or any other flags, just Islamic ones. Are they trying to tell us something? 4. "Islam for UK, Sharia for UK" - Meet the jihadists. 5. "Those who reject Allah love to live in darkness." You've been warned! 6. The purpose of this march is a call to Islam for the infidels, known as "Da'wa" in Islam and this is very very important and I will discuss why in my next essay. This has more meaning than you may realise, one being that this is how Mohammed waged jihad. 7. "What we are doing is a divine obligation for all Muslims." Is there a bell ringing with you? 8."Inviting the non-Muslims to Islam" - My word this is so important. It also indicates how confident the Muslim community now is in London. 9. "And we bear witness that Mohammed is the final messenger for mankind." So, he isn't really all that important then! 10. "All people of Bethnal Green, Muslims and non-Muslims: This is a public invitation to Islam...1400 years ago, the best man who walked the face of the earth..." As well as telling us exactly how revered their Prophet is, we have Da'wa again and I can't emphasise enough how important this is. This essay is long enough

as it is but I will go into more detail in the next one which will be looking at how Muslims treat non-believers so it will tie-in nicely. Conclusion Islam represents a very serious threat to our nation and future generations. It is vital that we British nationalists expose Islam for what it is via sincere debate and factual criticism. We need to be aware of how our opponents will try to prevent us from speaking the truth about Islam so being informed about what to expect and how to handle opposition will give us a huge advantage. The truth about Islam and its perverted, psychopathic prophet is its Achilles heel and the more we spread this truth the quicker Islam will be finished in our land without the need for violent conflict. Should Islam continue to flourish in our nation, there will come a time when the British people will have to convert to Islam, accept subjugation or fight. That is the reality of Islam wherever it goes and you'll see why this is so in the next part. I believe that should Islam continue to grow in Britain, the responsibility to defeat Islam will be passed on to future generations who will be forced to fight for their nation and their freedom. We don't have the right to bargain away their future for our comfort today and that is why it is critical for us to rid Islam from our land now, while we can without resorting to violence. Every British nationalist can play a part in sounding the clarion call to awaken our people to the truth about Islam. Forums, blogs, websites all give us the chance to comment, debate and challenge the lies and myths about "the religion of peace". The truth is the deadliest weapon we possess to help us defeat the global Islamic jihad. If we use it, we will prevail.

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad

"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty unto Him." - Qu'ran Sura 9, Verse 123 3. Britons In Peril - First Comes Saturday, Then Sunday Background Great Britain, a once proud Christian country, a nation upon whose mighty Empire "the sun never set" now faces a serious threat unlike any it has faced in its long and glorious history. The Marxist-Liberal ideology of Multiculturalism and ensuing mass-immigration has seen Islam grow and flourish within our borders, spawning an Islamic "fifth column" whose religious duty is to wage jihad upon our people until Islam reigns supreme. The recent Muslim march through London, complete with a call to Islam - Da'wa - and the disgraceful abuse of British soldiers returning from active service in Iraq by Muslim jihadists provide clear examples illustrating how confident the Muslim community is growing and that imposing Islam and Sharia law on the UK is their religious goal. I have attempted to explain that advancing Islam is the sacred religious duty for all Muslims, both in the two essays preceding this one and through many offline debates. Communicating this fact is a very difficult task because through political correctness and the liberal multicult ideology, many brainwashed politically correct

Britons believe Islam is a "Religion of Peace" and they are totally unaware of the supremacist reality of Islam and its psychopathic, warmongering prophet Mohammed. Ignorance is a weakness Muslims exploit to the maximum. Should anyone have the temerity to shine the spotlight of truth upon Islam, they will be accused of the hate-crimes of "Islamophobe" and "racist" and they will be supported by well-meaning but dangerously misguided infidel Britons who are setting up a nightmare future of subservience under Islamic hegemony in their homeland. Lying to the infidels to advance Islam, known as "Al Taqiyya" has been one of the most effective strategies deployed by Muslims to turn "Dar al Harb" - the lands of war, the domain of the infidel - into "Dar al Islam" - the lands of Islam, the domain of the believers, throughout the history of Islamic jihad. Studying the example of Mohammed "al insan al kamil" reveals that he would deceive his adversaries at will, and he stated quite clearly: "War is deceit." Keeping infidels trapped in a fog of ignorance is a cunning tactic that has enabled Muslims to conquer many nations and establish Islamic hegemony and if Britons continue to wallow in such comfortable but ultimately destructive ignorance, then Great Britain will become "Al Britannia" just as the kingdoms of once Christian Anatolia became Islamic Turkey. It is so important for British Nationalists - indeed, every Briton - to understand a simple truth about Islam: Its intolerance for nonbelievers and how non-believers are treated when they come in to contact with Muslims around the world. It is this intolerance and persecution of infidels that I will focus on in this essay and I warn you now, I am not going to hold back. What you are about to discover is disturbing, unpleasant, shocking and deeply distressing but it is a harsh, painful truth about Islam that has to be told. We ignore this uncomfortable truth at our great peril. Behold, this is the reality of the Islamic future that awaits you and your children... Who Do You Think You Are? I'm sure every Briton has heard the word "infidel". But I wonder how many of them know what an infidel actually is? For that matter, I wonder how many British Nationalists possess a full awareness of what this pejorative word means? Ask for a definition and more likely than not you will hear "Oh it's someone who isn't a Muslim" or even as I have heard several times "isn't it someone who is white?"

Understanding exactly how an infidel is regarded by Muslims is the first and most important step to take when studying the attitude of Muslims to, along with their treatment of, non-believers. When a land has been conquered by Islam, it becomes part of "Dar al Islam" meaning that it is a land where Islamic Sharia holds jurisprudence. So step one, what is the definition of an infidel under Sharia law. Under Islamic Sharia, Muslims find guidance regarding actions or objects they are permitted to use - called Halal - and they will also find actions and objects that are forbidden - Haram. Under Sharia, we find <a href="http://www.alislam.org/laws/najisthings.html">Najis</a>, objects and actions that are forbidden because they are "filth." There are ten of these: Dogs, pigs, dead bodies, the sweat or body fluids of these creatures, blood, semen, urine, faeces, alcohol and, yes, score one if you're ahead here, the infidel, the non-believer, also referred to as "kuffar" which is a much more common and far stronger word. This was the insult hurled at the fleeing Police in the recent proPalestinian marches on the streets of London. It is an absolutely disgusting insult, make no mistake about it. When people hear the word "Nigger" they are outraged, yet they remain totally indifferent to "kuffar". Nigger, although pejorative too, is a word that solely describes someone as being black and is derived from the Latin word "niger" - black. Yet look at those ten najis and see what Muslims regard the kuffar as the equivalent of. Just watch this, Muslims singing about kuffars, and I'm proud to see that our illustrious leader Nick Griffin gets a mention: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grPh2LZKN4w">Dirty Kuffar</a> Lovely video, isn't it, especially the end. It begins with the shahada, and a greeting "bismallah al rahim" - in the name of Allah the most merciful. See for yourself just how merciful Allah is. Islam - i.e. Muslims - regards ALL unbelievers, including you and I, as kuffars. Kuffars are the equivalent of pigs, dogs, urine and excreta, and as such, are regarded as the lowest of the low by Muslims. And the proof of just how much hatred Muslims have for kuffars is evidenced by their actions towards them wherever Muslims and kuffars co-exist.

The New "Untermensch" Qu'ran Sura 9 "Al Tawba - Repentance", verse 29: "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that forbidden which has been forbidden by Allah and his Messenger (Mohammed), nor acknowledge the religion of truth even if they are people of the book (Jews and Christians) until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued." Please read that verse once again, it is the most important verse in the Qu'ran for kuffars to be aware of and is referred to as "The Verse Of Tribute". An important note here before I continue. You may recall from the previous essay a video of an Islamic demonstration where Da'wa the call to Islam - was issued several times. I stated that this is very important and here's why. Read 9:29 and you will see "..nor acknowledge the religion of truth...". This means that if kuffars accept Islam and convert, then all is well. However, if they refuse, they are subjugated or killed. This is exactly how Mohammed waged war against the infidels, by first offering the call to Islam. The Islamic jihad being waged upon us today is all about the example set by Mohammed as I have stated repeatedly throughout these essays. I really hope you can now see why that particular Islamic march isn't quite as innocent as it looks. OK, let's continue and you're going to see exactly how 9:29 works. The verse of tribute has been used by Muslims to subjugate kuffars throughout the world and relegate them to the status of Dhimmitude - subservience to Muslims. Although it explicitly states dhimmitude only applies to Jews and Christians, Hindus are also afforded dhimmi status too. The Jizya is the tax dhimmis must pay to their Muslim masters or face death. It's a protection racket if you like and the bad news is should Muslims decide they've had enough they will withdraw dhimmi status and persecution ensues. 9:29, this barbaric verse, is responsible for millions of deaths and God knows how much persecution for non-believers. The choices given to kuffars are quite clear in this verse: Convert to Islam, accept dhimmitude WILLINGLY or fight and die. The whole status of dhimmitude though is just a ruse. The end result is ALWAYS the same: Convert, fight or die.

Of course Muslims will be outraged at what I'm writing, but they're outraged about anything and everything aren't they? Instead of listening to demented pious fanatics who try to bully and intimidate people into accepting their own demise, let's look around the world and see what actually happens to kuffars wherever Islamic Sharia rules. As Britain is still - just about - a Christian nation and because many of the remaining practising Christians like the Arch-Dhimmi of Canterbury believe they will be able to co-exist peacefully with Muslims, let's now see how Christians and Muslims get on around the world. Sunday, Sunday First port of call: The Middle East. Saudi Arabia, the land where Muslims believe the Islamic prophet Mohammed received the revelations of the Qu'ran, offers a good start to gain an insight of Muslim hatred towards the kuffar. Not only are Jews forbidden to enter Saudi Arabia, no kuffar is allowed to enter the holy cities of Mecca and Medina on pain of death. Do other religions have similar attitude towards non-believers visiting their holy cities and their places of worship? Take an educated guess as to the person who made this rule. Hint: He married and then raped a child. "First we deal with the Saturday people then we deal with the Sunday people." <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=ZWpIWDjQLUU&">The West Doesn't Realise What They Are Facing With Islam</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN9YkfLXlOs">They Hate You Because Of Religion</a> Whilst our military personnel are fighting and dying in Iraq "to establish democracy", this is what is happening to Assyrian Christians: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=oHjzRBex0Mo">Convert, Pay Or Die</a> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=h503pUkqfoQ">Genocide of Iraqi Christians</a>

<a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/2007/07/0 17595print.html">Boy Crucified, Baby Roasted</a> Remind me again, what was it Anjem Choudary and his cowardly band of jihadists were accusing the British soldiers of doing in Iraq? How strange that we don't see "moderate Muslims" on the streets of London protesting against what "extremists who don't represent the Muslim community" are doing to Assyrian Christians. Then there's that place where those Nazi Jews are oppressing the poor Arab Muslims: <a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp? ARTICLE_ID=31285">Christians In The Palestine Authority</a> And let's take a good look at what those poor, oppressed "Palestinians" did to once Christian and once beautiful Lebanon, crown jewel of the Middle East: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=21orCM7KkRI&NR">Palestinians Persecute Christians In Lebanon</a> The video above sounds a very clear warning about what is going to happen to Britain, the circumstances that led to the destruction of Lebanon are exactly the circumstances being created in Britain right now. And let me ask you this: If the Muslims in Lebanon could kill 100,000 ARAB Christians, what on earth do you think they will do to British Christians? Funny how the media never mention any of this though isn't it? Too busy spreading pro-Palestinian propaganda for HAMAS and Hizballah no doubt. Well, they have to keep their Saudi paymasters happy. Mustn't offend our Saudi masters whatever we do. But what about Egypt? Surely things are better there? It's a lovely place for a holiday and everyone knows it's now a modern secular society: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=D3tmcpUqWGo">Christian Copts Live In The Garbage 1of 3</a> <a href="http://voiceofthecopts.org/en/breaking_news/muslim_burns_

a_young_copt_alive_and_murders_his_father_because_o.html/">C hristian Burned Alive In Egypt</a> Surely that's all because of the unique problems in the Middle East, it's not as bad in other Muslim countries such as one of the world's biggest Muslim populations, Indonesia: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=2eKOB1ZPGnk">Christians Persecuted In Indonesia</a> Including little Christian girls:

Are Christians faring any better anywhere else? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXjlkaMikY">Christians Persecuted By Muslims Around The World</a> Choosing Extermination What grates with me is the typical "turn the other cheek" suicidal Christian cowardice the narrator makes at the end. Feeling spiritual is much better than standing up to Muslim brutality and persecution is it? Not if you want to survive - along with your faith - it isn't. Christians have to understand: Muslims are not playing a game here. The choice is Islam, subjugation or death and being spiritual isn't going to cut the mustard. Islam must be stopped or Islam will destroy you unless you convert. Period.

But why take Reconquista's words about persecution of Christians being a very real fate for kuffar Britons. The Muslims are telling you themselves:

Get the message, Sunday people, you dirty kuffars? Qu'ran Sura 9 "Al Tawba - Repentance", verse 05: "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." The Saturday people and the Sunday people aren't the only kuffars to be persecuted at the hands of devout Muslims. The verse above, 9:05 from the Qu'ran, is also called "The Verse of the Sword" and it defines how Muslims are to deal with idolaters. Idolaters such as the Hindus in India who have been on the receiving end of Islamic jihad since 638, total deaths estimated at a staggering EIGHTY MILLION and it is a persecution that continues today. Hindus are guilty of the diabolical crime of "Mushrikoun" or "Shirk", that is worshipping more than one deity. This really does outrage Muslims - how dare you worship more than one deity - so Mushrikoun have to be taught a lesson in Islamic tolerance:

Hindu Monk Tied and Beaten By Muslims

Hindu Being Beaten To Death By Muslims Outside A Mosque In Bangladesh. He had the nerve to pass-by a Mosque minding his own business just as moderate Muslims were leaving Friday prayer.

The "Religion of Peace" At Work In Mumbai So far, we have seen how Christians are treated in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, "Palestine", Egypt, Indonesia and had a quick tour around the world. We've also looked at how Hindus are faring in India so there can't be any more kuffars who are being persecuted can there? Nirvana Versus Jihad If there is one conflict that truly shows up Muslims for the intolerant, violent and oppressive fanatics they really are it is the Islamic jihad being waged in Southern Thailand against the Buddhists. Yes, you read that correctly, Buddhists. Those people who believe strictly in non-violence and peace, who believe no living creature should be harmed and who have pretty much caused no harm to any other people are now being treated to the delights of "The Religion of Peace." Over 3,300 Buddhists have been slaughtered to date by fanatical Islamic jihadists who fight in Allah's cause. And yet once again, the media give little coverage to this conflict, focusing attention instead on the sham "Palestinian" cause conveniently ignoring the fact that Muslims are oppressing and slaughtering thousands upon thousands of non-believers around the world all to the cry of "Allahu Akhbar!" as they devoutly follow the perfect example of their faith, the insane paedophile, murderer and enslaver Mohammed.

<a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/thailand/090311/thailan d-the-war-youve-never-heard">Jihad Against Buddhists</a> The following video discusses the jihad against the Buddhists and makes some very interesting comparisons between how the Thai and western governments respond to Islamic jihad: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nOg7_0UHQ8">Jihad In Thailand</a> Whenever you hear Islamic apologists trotting out the usual lame, pathetic excuses to tolerate the intolerable, you can now ask them why it is that Muslims can't even tolerate Buddhists. And to see what devout Muslims are capable of doing to human beings solely because they are Buddhists - "kuffars" - here's how the "Religion of Peace" spreads its message in Thailand: <a href="http://www.zombietime.com/thai_jihad_photos/">Buddhists Massacred By Muslims</a> Did you get the word used in the "get out of town" note the Thai Muslim jihadists sent to the Buddhist teacher? Time To Reflect I wanted to continue this essay by providing more evidence to demonstrate the depraved cruelty Muslims are capable of doing to human beings as they follow the example of their psychopathic prophet and the laws laid down in Sharia that reflect the divine will of Allah but I think you and I both need a break from the revolting horrors of Islam for now. I think it is also a time to reflect that what you have discovered in this essay is occurring right now to real human beings whose only crime is to be a non-Muslim. The world ignores their cries of pain, the agony of their suffering and their appalling persecution, preferring instead to tolerate, support and protect the very people who are responsible for these vile crimes against humanity Muslims who are funded by petrodollar rich states, especially Saudi Arabia and Iran. We are at war with these Islamic states and we have to recognise this or these states are going to fund the destruction of our nation. THIS IS GOING ON RIGHT NOW.

Please know this and know it well: The human beings you've seen and heard in this essay are no different to you and I and what has happened - and is happening - to them will happen to us unless we rid the cancer of Islam from our land. What kind of world tolerates this vile, barbaric, inhumane hate-filled "religion" and when will we all have the strength of our convictions to stand up and say: "No more Islam, not here, not anywhere. We tolerate the intolerant no more." I will continue to provide more evidence about how evil Islam is in the next essay but before I go, allow me to leave you with this little gem from a true fountain of human kindness: "Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males provided they are not disabled or incapacitated to prepare themselves for the conquest of countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic holy war will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world." - Ayatollah Khomeini I wonder where he found the inspiration for that?

Resistance: The British Counter-Jihad

4. A Man's World - Sharia Rules AA! Background In my previous essay, I presented evidence to demonstrate how Muslims persecute, subjugate and abuse non-believers - kuffars wherever Islam comes into contact with other religions. Jews around the world are persecuted by Muslims, Christians in Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq and throughout Africa are subjugated and oppressed by Muslims, Hindus in India continue to be massacred by fanatical jihadists and amazingly, the Buddhists of Southern Thailand are also feeling the enriching benefits of co-existing alongside the "Religion of Peace". The appalling persecutions of the Middle Eastern Christians and of the Thai Buddhists are rarely given extensive coverage in the western media, a media who deceptively promote Islam as a tolerant, peaceful religion to the British people. Contrast the coverage given to the Islamic jihad against the Buddhists in Southern Thailand that is ongoing and has claimed more than 3300 innocent lives with the coverage of the Islamic jihad against Israel. But of course, Israel is a Nazi state conducting a holocaust against those "oppressed" people living in the western funded jizya-rich state - sorry, poverty stricken ghetto - of Gaza and who lost over 100 HAMAS jihadists - sorry again, innocent peace-loving Muslims in the recent conflict. Holocaust indeed.

Yet in spite of the clear and damning evidence proving Islam is anything but peaceful towards non-believers, many Britons still believe it is possible to live in harmony with Muslims. Apologists continually offer lame excuses to defend Islam: A minority of extremists; misinterpreting the "peaceful message" of Islam; it's because of Western immorality and decadence; it's the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; it's the crusades; it's because of "Palestine"; it's because the Islamic prophet Mohammed was insulted - all of them bankrupt without a single grain of truth between them. But I'm not going to debunk all of the lame excuses trotted out to defend Islam by deceitful Muslims and infidel apologists alike. I'll leave that for a future time. Instead, I want to let Islam speak for itself by taking a good, hard look at Islamic countries, countries where Sharia law is enforced. In other words, we're now going to see how Muslims treat Muslims to see how peacefully they TREAT THEIR OWN PEOPLE. Bear this firmly in mind as you read: What they are capable of doing to each other they will in turn do to you, your children and your children's children if Islam continues to be tolerated and promoted in Great Britain. Islamic hegemony comes with Sharia law and... Sharia rules, Allahu Akhbar! The Elusive Obvious A core principle of British justice is that all are equal before the law. Obviously, there are many exceptions to this fine principle, you and I both know that the great unwashed are treated differently from the ruling elite and they always have been. But by and large, the concept of equality before the law is applied in the main. Does Islamic Sharia law uphold this noble principle? I'm sad to say that it absolutely does not and in this essay you're going to discover the shocking, brutal reality about the legal system that enforces the will of Allah and his "Religion of Peace". Let's make a start by examining the practice of "Blood Money", that is money paid to the family of a victim by the guilty party based on the value of the victim. Under Sharia law, the value of the life of a Muslim woman is half that of a Muslim male. If you're a Dhimmi (that's the Saturday and Sunday people, the Jews and the Christians), your life is worth half that of a Muslim woman. I'm not

going to elaborate further on how Dhimmis fare under Sharia, I discussed it in my previous essay. This time, I am going to focus on what I call "the elusive obvious" about Islam and Sharia law: It is a legal system that enforces apartheid, not just upon kuffars but also upon Muslim women. In Islam, Sharia law is all about the LEGAL enforcement of Muslim male dominance and Islamic supremacy. Blood money illustrates this clearly. If the victim of a crime - let's say murder for example - is a female, then her family will receive half the amount that would've been awarded to them had the victim been male. Under Sharia law, a Muslim woman is afforded very few of the rights and freedoms her fellow females enjoy - and take for granted it has to be said - in western societies. Sharia law, in full accordance with the example set by the Islamic prophet Mohammed, legally permits adult Muslim males to marry little girls when they reach nine years of age as they are deemed to be sexually developed women at this tender stage in their lives. In some Islamic countries, grown men have taken children as young as three years old for their brides in weddings conducted according to the Sharia, Afghanistan especially. As for marital rights, forget it. Should a Muslim male decide to divorce his wife, all he has to say is "I divorce you" three times and the marriage is over. More often than not, he will be given custody of the children - not the ones he may have married that is - and the woman will be given absolutely nothing. Zip, zilch, nada. Thanks for the memories now pack your bags and get lost. Brutal? Harsh? Welcome to Sharia. Allah's Imperfect Creations A Muslim wife is relegated to the level of an owned possession entirely subservient to her husband. She is his property, his slave, and she must comply to his demands - or else. Under the Sharia, a Muslim husband has the right to beat his wife for such heinous crimes as cooking an unsatisfactory meal; refusing to wear the niqab (veil) or the full body-concealing burqa; refusing his sexual demands or disobeying his orders. Sharia law upholds the right of a man to violently beat his wife in obedience to the will of Allah explicitly expressed in the Qu'ran:

"Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great." - Qu'ran, Sura 4, An-Nisa (Women) verse 34 The contempt male Muslims have for their own women is again all down to the example of "al insan al kamil uswa hasana", the perfect example for all time, their revered prophet Mohammed. This is a prophet who had a low opinion of the fairer sex, an opinion he made clear on several occasions and here's just one example: "I was standing at the edge of the fire of hell and most of the people going in were women." - Islamic Prophet Mohammed Isn't that a delightful, peaceful sentiment expressed by a so-called messenger of God? And how remiss of the ever high, great and exalted Allah to create such an imperfect being he needs a male to physically beat her to correct his silly errors before packing them off to eternal damnation and fire everlasting to pay for his rank incompetence. Fulfilling her husband's desire for sexual gratification whenever his lust is peaking is an obligation no Muslim wife dare refuse. If she refuses his advances, for any reason, then she is going against the divine will of Allah who again has expressed exactly how men should regard women in his little handbook for Muslims, the Qu'ran: "Your wives are a tilth for you, so go into your tilth when you like, and do good beforehand for yourselves; and be careful (of your duty) to Allah, and know that you will meet Him, and give good news to the believers." - Qu'ran, Sura 2, Al Baqara (The Cow) Verse 223 In this charming verse, Allah states that Muslim wives are nothing more than fields (tilth) to be entered whenever a man feels like it. And under Islamic Sharia, a man is entitled to marry four wives whereas the same "privilege" is not afforded to any Muslim woman, although with men having the legal right to beat their wives under Sharia, wanting to marry up to four men would not be a popular choice with Muslim women I think you'd agree. I wonder what Muslim women would really think? Who knows, they're not entitled to freely hold their own opinions about these matters, and besides,

their menfolk will tell them exactly what to think and do as they know best. And if their women dare refuse to do as they're told their menfolk will soon knock some sense into them, Allah be praised. Forbidden Fruit In examining the harsh treatment Muslim males dish out towards their women-folk, it is clear that sex is the driving factor. Allowing a woman the freedom to enjoy her sexuality - a freedom that is hers by right of nature - is a big no-no. From being forced to cover her face or even her entire body so as not to set a sexually-frustrated, lust-crazed Muslim male's loins ablaze, to not even being allowed to pray alongside her menfolk when worshipping at the Mosque, it's blatantly obvious that female sexuality is a bit of a taboo in Islam. Bit of a taboo? That's akin to saying the current economic crisis created by the lib/lab/con is a tad inconvenient! Sex and sexuality is something Muslim males can freely enjoy - just as their paedophile prophet Mohammed did - but for women sex is considered forbidden fruit and sex is used to oppress and abuse them, all legally enforced by the Sharia. Denying a female her sexuality starts in childhood. Many Islamic countries: Egypt, Sudan, Yemen, Somalia practice the abhorrent and cruel Female Genital Mutilation, where the clitoris is removed from a little girl often using unsterilised equipment and regularly performed by unqualified persons. In many other Islamic countries and indeed in Muslim communities around the globe, FGM may well be deemed illegal but it still goes on "underground", with both Islamic authorities and government bodies turning a blind eye and I include Great Britain in that group I'm ashamed to say. As if removing a woman's clitoris wasn't enough to contain her sexuality, strict segregation in Muslim societies is also enforced. Sex before marriage is strictly forbidden - for women that is - and for a woman to be alone with any male who is not a relative is strictly forbidden under the Sharia. Guidance for mixing with the opposite sex is outlined in what are referred to as "proximity laws", and the punishments for breaking proximity laws are harsh and brutal - for the woman but far less so for a male more often than not with the exception of Shia Iran - as you will soon see. Before I continue, let's just take a quick checkpoint here. I've stated that Sharia law enforces apartheid. So far we've seen that under this Islamic legal system, Muslim women are:

Regarded as half the worth of a Muslim male; Forbidden to freely associate with people of their choosing; Denied the right to dress as they please; Prevented from worshipping alongside their menfolk at the mosque; Cruelly robbed of their natural sexuality through FGM; Forced to obey their husbands under LEGAL threat of violence; Divorced at the drop of a hat and finally; Denied the same right to divorce their husbands. Are not all of these abuses of women enough to convince you that this is gender apartheid? That all of this abuse amounts to nothing less than the mental, physical and sexual abuse of women, fully legalised under Islamic Sharia. Women who are being relegated to the level of chattels and punch-bags whose sole "sacred religious duty" in life is to serve and obey their Muslim male masters all cunningly camouflaged as the expressed will of "a great and exalted deity". May I remind you, all of this is fully sanctioned by the "Religion of Peace." All of it, I am not making this up I assure you. You'd think all of this cruel and widespread abuse of females would be sufficient to draw the strongest possible condemnation from the entire civilised world wouldn't you? Sanctions, exclusion from sporting events, celebrities refusing to visit Islamic countries along with pious, preaching musicians playing to packed out stadia all demanding an end to "the inhumanity of apartheid" just as they all did with South Africa. Not so. Instead, the deafening sound of silence tolerates these dreadful violations of human rights. You would also think the abuse couldn't possibly get much worse for women under Islamic Sharia. Well, think again. Amazingly, it gets much worse as you are about to discover. Violating The Violated Take a deep breath because what follows is quite frankly shocking and incredible. The full horrors of how human beings are treated in

Islamic countries under Sharia law are by themselves more than enough to clearly prove that Islam is anything but a "Religion of Peace." That these nauseating, diabolical horrors continue to be perpetrated shames the entire civilised world, a world cowered by Islamic jihad and its oil weapon into consenting silence. One of the very worst crimes a woman can fall victim to is rape. It is a cruel, inhumane violation of her person, it is an abuse of her sexuality, a crime against her entire being with deep-seated mental scars to accompany the physical wounds she will have received during the traumatic assault. In an earlier essay I highlighted the plight of Muslim women in Pakistan, where 85% of the women imprisoned there are actually rape victims. Pakistan is perhaps the worst example but it is by no means unique as numerous rape victims suffer the same dreadful fate throughout the Islamic world. How can this be so? How can a woman so cruelly violated once go on to be ruthlessly and mercilessly violated a second time by the Islamic courts who enforce and uphold the Sharia, the legal system of the "Religion of Peace"? As I have stated throughout these essays, we will find the answer by referring to the perfect example set by the Islamic prophet Mohammed, a perfect example every Muslim consults. Under Islamic Sharia, it is nigh-on impossible for a raped woman to prove her case. Because under this legal system, a woman requires four male witnesses - that is, witnesses who actually saw penetration take place - who were present during the rape. If she cannot produce these witnesses, she is guilty of violating proximity laws and is sent to prison as punishment for her sex crime. This is a law personally formulated by Mohammed after he was informed by three witnesses that his favourite wife, Aisha - the little girl he raped when she was just nine years of age - had been having an affair. He refused to believe them and stated that four witnesses would be needed to prove her infidelity. All recorded in the Haddith of <a href="http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resour ces/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/059.sbt.html#005.059.462">Sahi h Bukhari 5:59:462 and in Aisha's own words</a> So much suffering for so many women all from this one incident.

What Sharia Isn't - Or Is It? I had intended to highlight further legalised abuse of women under Islamic Sharia by examining the abhorrent practice of the scandalously mis-named "honour killings" that are rife in Islamic countries and in Muslim communities around the world and now including western nations too. But although this is another barbaric crime against humanity mostly carried out by Muslims, I found that it is not endorsed or permitted under Sharia law so it is beyond the scope of this essay. I will however state that Muslim families who are guilty of killing their wives, sisters or daughters because they want to "regain the family honour" are rarely punished under Sharia law and if they are punished, they are punished very lightly indeed. Robert Spencer nails the issue of honour killings and Islam in this excellent article over on DhimmiWatch: <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/022891.p hp">Islam and Honour Killings</a> I think that's enough on this. For now. Playing Away It's something that has gone on throughout human history. All of us are tempted by the "sins of the flesh" whether we are carefree singletons or bonded into the commitments of marriage. When temptation arises it is very, very difficult to say "no". Many marriages have had to cope with the infidelity of a wayward partner, many marriages have come through it stronger. Obviously, many marriages have collapsed because of it. Adultery is strictly forbidden under Sharia law and the punishments for the guilty parties go way beyond a failed marriage and a traumatic, destructive impact on the couple's broken lives for a while. Rather than write my "kuffar" description of how Sharia punishes adulterers, I think it a much better idea to allow an Imam to explain to us the Islamic rulings along with an example of the punishment being carried out on adulterers so we are in no doubt whatsoever: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=uGaXxtvf2bM">Punishment For Adultery In Islam</a>

The narrator's comment at the end says it all really. In Iran, for once, Islamic Sharia punishes males guilty of adultery in the same way as women are punished and here is another video that provides a shocking, horrific and graphic example of the brutal and barbaric treatment Islam and Sharia law inflict upon their own people, human beings just like you and I. Please note that at the beginning of the video, you will discover why adulterers are punished so harshly in Islam and note also the rules governing the sizes of the stones: <a href="http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm">Adult erers Punished In Iran By Stoning</a> What a gruesome, cruel and inhumane punishment carried out in the name of the "Religion of Peace". I know it is distressing to watch it but this is the barbaric reality of Islam and it is a barbaric reality that is coming to Great Britain - and indeed all of Europe and the USA - unless we stand up to Islam and banish it from our lands. We British ignore the barbaric reality of Islam at our great peril. As British nationalists we have a duty to ensure that future British generations are not left to suffer the horrors of Islam. You have just seen exactly why this duty is so important. A little question for you: Are the stone-throwing, blood-thirsty Muslims screaming "Allahu Akhbar!" in the crowd extremists or are they part of the majority of peaceful, tolerant Muslims we are continually told constitute true Islam? The point here is not to mistake Islamic terrorists as the only ones who commit violent atrocities in the name of Islam. It is not just about Islamic terror, it is all about what Islam truly is in its entirety. Chop Chop! Violations of proximity laws and sex crimes are not the only crimes to be punished so brutally and so cruelly under Islamic Sharia law. As well as highlighting it as a legal system that enforces gender apartheid, religious apartheid and the violent abuse of women, Sharia also carries out harsh, inhumane punishments on other criminals. Most of us have had our property stolen at some point in our lives: A bicycle, a car, money, jewellery, phone, etc. and although it is annoying and upsetting, the punishments handed out to thieves in

western societies are in stark contrast to those dealt out in Sharia law. I'm sure we've all said something like: "If I got my hands on them they'd be sorry!" when we're angry but I wonder how many of us would seriously advocate the following as a suitable punishment for thieves: "And (as for) the man who steals and the woman who steals, cut off their hands as a punishment for what they have earned, an exemplary punishment from Allah; and Allah is Mighty, Wise. " - Qu'ran Sura 5 Al Maeda (The Table) Verse 38 This is what Islam will bring to our nation. Islam comes with Sharia law and it is a law Muslims will impose upon you, by force if necessary. It is a law being practised and enforced around the world wherever Islam goes and the inhumane punishments meted out under the Sharia are going to come to Britain. Cruel, inhumane punishments such as the following: <a href="http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/handcutting.htm"> Thieves Punished Under Sharia Law</a> Note again who decreed that this was a just punishment with the quote from the appropriate haddith, again demonstrating as I have stressed throughout these essays: We must stop listening to apologists and do what Muslims do and that is to refer not just to the verses of the Qu'ran but also to the example of the Islamic prophet Mohammed as described and witnessed in the Sunnah. If we want to know the truth about Islam then that is where we will find it. Conclusion Great Britain is gradually becoming Islamised along with the rest of Europe. At the current rate, Islamic hegemony - i.e. the rule of Sharia law - could well imposed in our land in just 20 years time. You've already seen how intolerant Islam is towards non-believers of various faiths including Christianity as described in part three of this series of essays concerning the British Counter-jihad. In this essay, you have now seen that under Islamic Sharia law, Muslims inflict cruel and inhumane treatment on their own people, including the enforcement of gender apartheid. The horrific abuses women are enduring in Islamic countries around the world and of course, in Muslim communities in Great Britain, are the same

horrific abuses that WILL FOR SURE be inflicted upon your wives, your sisters, your daughters, your mothers - ALL BRITISH WOMEN under the rule of Islamic Sharia law. That is the shocking nightmare future that awaits them if we fail in our duty to rid the inhumane, barbaric "Religion of Peace" from the realm. It should never ever have been allowed into our nation and those of our own who we trusted to govern and protect us committed the worst act of treason in British history by importing Islam. But the traitors can wait for now. The time for them to account for their disgusting betrayal will come. First we must deal with the very serious threat of Islam. In the next essay, I am going to discuss the actions we can take to fight the Islamic jihad and believe me when I say there are many things we can do and although it won't be easy, we will defeat the Islamic jihad being waged against us. Until then, may I humbly request that you re-read these four essays to remind yourself about all of the issues raised so that they're fresh in your mind ready for the battle ahead. Can I further ask you to brainstorm ideas with fellow nationalists about how we can PEACEFULLY and LEGALLY counter Islamic jihad and PM them to me or Green Arrow on the Green Arrow forum at his brilliant BNP supporting blog here: <a href="http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com">The Home Of The Green Arrow</a> Every idea counts and I want to include as many effective ones as possible in the next essay. I already have some very canny tactics and strategies to help us defeat our enemy and I welcome more. Finally, I think it most fitting that I end this essay with one of the most courageous women fighting the global Islamic jihad, a woman from Syria who has experienced first-hand the very real horrors inflicted upon human beings under Islamic Sharia law, the inspirational Wafa Sultan. She warns us of the Islamic nightmare being prepared for Great Britain and the west unless we fightback: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=up3yuQDAWKQ">Defend The Heaven You Live In</a> Wafa Sultan says no one is listening and no one has the courage to speak the truth about Islam. It's time we listened, it's time we spoke the truth and it's time we took peaceful but effective action to fight Islam. It is a matter of the utmost urgency, it really is our

civilised way of life or their retarded, inhumane and barbaric death cult. Islam has declared war on us and now it's us or them, that's your stark but simple choice. Time for you to get involved in the British Counter-Jihad, let's stand together and fight together for an Islam-free Britain. Reconquista.